@techreport{abualhaija2023replication,
      title={Replication and Verifiability in Requirements Engineering: the NLP for RE Case}, 
      author={Sallam Abualhaija and Fatma Başak Aydemir and Fabiano Dalpiaz and Davide Dell'Anna and Alessio Ferrari and Xavier Franch and Davide Fucci},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2304.10265},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.SE},
      url_Link       = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10265},
      url_Paper = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10265.pdf},
      keywords  = {Automated classification, Machine Learning, Software Engineering, Replication Study, Requirements Engineering, Software Testing, NLP4RE},
  abstract = {[Context] Study replication is essential for theory building and empirical validation. [Problem] Despite its empirical vocation, requirements engineering (RE) research has given limited attention to study replication, threatening thereby the ability to verify existing results and use previous research as a baseline. [Solution] In this perspective paper, we -- a group of experts in natural language processing (NLP) for RE -- reflect on the challenges for study replication in NLP for RE. Concretely: (i) we report on hands-on experiences of replication, (ii) we review the state-of-the-art and extract replication-relevant information, and (iii) we identify, through focus groups, challenges across two typical dimensions of replication: data annotation and tool reconstruction. NLP for RE is a research area that is suitable for study replication since it builds on automated tools which can be shared, and quantitative evaluation that enable direct comparisons between results. [Results] Replication is hampered by several factors, including the context specificity of the studies, the heterogeneity of the tasks involving NLP, the tasks' inherent hairiness, and, in turn, the heterogeneous reporting structure. To address these issues, we propose an ID card whose goal is to provide a structured summary of research papers, with an emphasis on replication-relevant information. [Contribution] We contribute in this study with: (i) a set of reflections on replication in NLP for RE, (ii) a set of recommendations for researchers in the field to increase their awareness on the topic, and (iii) an ID card that is intended to primarily foster replication, and can also be used in other contexts, e.g., for educational purposes. Practitioners will also benefit from the results since replications increase confidence on research findings.}
}

{"_id":"6j7pMft346bnWKBCA","bibbaseid":"abualhaija-aydemir-dalpiaz-dellanna-ferrari-franch-fucci-replicationandverifiabilityinrequirementsengineeringthenlpforrecase-2023","author_short":["Abualhaija, S.","Aydemir, F. B.","Dalpiaz, F.","Dell'Anna, D.","Ferrari, A.","Franch, X.","Fucci, D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"techreport","type":"techreport","title":"Replication and Verifiability in Requirements Engineering: the NLP for RE Case","author":[{"firstnames":["Sallam"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Abualhaija"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Fatma","Başak"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Aydemir"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Fabiano"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dalpiaz"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Davide"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dell'Anna"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Alessio"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ferrari"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Xavier"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Franch"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Davide"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fucci"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2023","eprint":"2304.10265","archiveprefix":"arXiv","primaryclass":"cs.SE","url_link":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10265","url_paper":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10265.pdf","keywords":"Automated classification, Machine Learning, Software Engineering, Replication Study, Requirements Engineering, Software Testing, NLP4RE","abstract":"[Context] Study replication is essential for theory building and empirical validation. [Problem] Despite its empirical vocation, requirements engineering (RE) research has given limited attention to study replication, threatening thereby the ability to verify existing results and use previous research as a baseline. [Solution] In this perspective paper, we – a group of experts in natural language processing (NLP) for RE – reflect on the challenges for study replication in NLP for RE. Concretely: (i) we report on hands-on experiences of replication, (ii) we review the state-of-the-art and extract replication-relevant information, and (iii) we identify, through focus groups, challenges across two typical dimensions of replication: data annotation and tool reconstruction. NLP for RE is a research area that is suitable for study replication since it builds on automated tools which can be shared, and quantitative evaluation that enable direct comparisons between results. [Results] Replication is hampered by several factors, including the context specificity of the studies, the heterogeneity of the tasks involving NLP, the tasks' inherent hairiness, and, in turn, the heterogeneous reporting structure. To address these issues, we propose an ID card whose goal is to provide a structured summary of research papers, with an emphasis on replication-relevant information. [Contribution] We contribute in this study with: (i) a set of reflections on replication in NLP for RE, (ii) a set of recommendations for researchers in the field to increase their awareness on the topic, and (iii) an ID card that is intended to primarily foster replication, and can also be used in other contexts, e.g., for educational purposes. Practitioners will also benefit from the results since replications increase confidence on research findings.","bibtex":"@techreport{abualhaija2023replication,\n title={Replication and Verifiability in Requirements Engineering: the NLP for RE Case}, \n author={Sallam Abualhaija and Fatma Başak Aydemir and Fabiano Dalpiaz and Davide Dell'Anna and Alessio Ferrari and Xavier Franch and Davide Fucci},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2304.10265},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.SE},\n url_Link = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10265},\n url_Paper = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10265.pdf},\n keywords = {Automated classification, Machine Learning, Software Engineering, Replication Study, Requirements Engineering, Software Testing, NLP4RE},\n abstract = {[Context] Study replication is essential for theory building and empirical validation. [Problem] Despite its empirical vocation, requirements engineering (RE) research has given limited attention to study replication, threatening thereby the ability to verify existing results and use previous research as a baseline. [Solution] In this perspective paper, we -- a group of experts in natural language processing (NLP) for RE -- reflect on the challenges for study replication in NLP for RE. Concretely: (i) we report on hands-on experiences of replication, (ii) we review the state-of-the-art and extract replication-relevant information, and (iii) we identify, through focus groups, challenges across two typical dimensions of replication: data annotation and tool reconstruction. NLP for RE is a research area that is suitable for study replication since it builds on automated tools which can be shared, and quantitative evaluation that enable direct comparisons between results. [Results] Replication is hampered by several factors, including the context specificity of the studies, the heterogeneity of the tasks involving NLP, the tasks' inherent hairiness, and, in turn, the heterogeneous reporting structure. To address these issues, we propose an ID card whose goal is to provide a structured summary of research papers, with an emphasis on replication-relevant information. [Contribution] We contribute in this study with: (i) a set of reflections on replication in NLP for RE, (ii) a set of recommendations for researchers in the field to increase their awareness on the topic, and (iii) an ID card that is intended to primarily foster replication, and can also be used in other contexts, e.g., for educational purposes. Practitioners will also benefit from the results since replications increase confidence on research findings.}\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Abualhaija, S.","Aydemir, F. B.","Dalpiaz, F.","Dell'Anna, D.","Ferrari, A.","Franch, X.","Fucci, D."],"key":"abualhaija2023replication","id":"abualhaija2023replication","bibbaseid":"abualhaija-aydemir-dalpiaz-dellanna-ferrari-franch-fucci-replicationandverifiabilityinrequirementsengineeringthenlpforrecase-2023","role":"author","urls":{" link":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10265"," paper":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10265.pdf"},"keyword":["Automated classification","Machine Learning","Software Engineering","Replication Study","Requirements Engineering","Software Testing","NLP4RE"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":2,"html":""},"bibtype":"techreport","biburl":"http://davidedellanna.com/publications/dellanna.bib","dataSources":["Rymgh7KJx3EhNfvG8","6mqXRucaPuwqWyQEd","2pnuieZznE6L96taK","jWumkkD2sHa7JC9Lc"],"keywords":["automated classification","machine learning","software engineering","replication study","requirements engineering","software testing","nlp4re"],"search_terms":["replication","verifiability","requirements","engineering","nlp","case","abualhaija","aydemir","dalpiaz","dell'anna","ferrari","franch","fucci"],"title":"Replication and Verifiability in Requirements Engineering: the NLP for RE Case","year":2023,"downloads":2}