@article{adler_priority_2017,
	title = {Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon},
	volume = {7},
	issn = {1758-678X, 1758-6798},
	url = {http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3298},
	doi = {10.1038/nclimate3298},
	abstract = {The social cost of carbon (SCC) is a key tool in climate policy. The SCC expresses in monetary terms the social impact of the emission of a ton of CO2 in a given year. The SCC is calculated using a ‘social welfare function’ (SWF): a method for assessing social welfare. The dominant SWFin climate policy is the discounted-utilitarian SWF. Individuals’well-being numbers (utilities) are summed, and the values for later generations are reduced (‘discounted’). This SWF has been criticized for ignoring the distribution of well-being and including an arbitrary time preference. Here, we use a ‘prioritarian’ SWF, with no time discount, to calculate the SCC. This SWF gives extra weight (‘priority’) to worse-off individuals. Prioritarianism is a well-developed concept in ethics and welfare economics, but has been rarely used in climate scholarship. We find substantial differences between the discounted-utilitarian and non-discounted prioritarian SCCs.},
	number = {6},
	urldate = {2017-09-19},
	journal = {Nature Climate Change},
	author = {Adler, Matthew and Anthoff, David and Bosetti, Valentina and Garner, Greg and Keller, Klaus and Treich, Nicolas},
	month = may,
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {KR, Untagged},
	pages = {443--449},
}

{"_id":"jWc5uwBWTbz89QSq8","bibbaseid":"adler-anthoff-bosetti-garner-keller-treich-priorityfortheworseoffandthesocialcostofcarbon-2017","author_short":["Adler, M.","Anthoff, D.","Bosetti, V.","Garner, G.","Keller, K.","Treich, N."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon","volume":"7","issn":"1758-678X, 1758-6798","url":"http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3298","doi":"10.1038/nclimate3298","abstract":"The social cost of carbon (SCC) is a key tool in climate policy. The SCC expresses in monetary terms the social impact of the emission of a ton of CO2 in a given year. The SCC is calculated using a ‘social welfare function’ (SWF): a method for assessing social welfare. The dominant SWFin climate policy is the discounted-utilitarian SWF. Individuals’well-being numbers (utilities) are summed, and the values for later generations are reduced (‘discounted’). This SWF has been criticized for ignoring the distribution of well-being and including an arbitrary time preference. Here, we use a ‘prioritarian’ SWF, with no time discount, to calculate the SCC. This SWF gives extra weight (‘priority’) to worse-off individuals. Prioritarianism is a well-developed concept in ethics and welfare economics, but has been rarely used in climate scholarship. We find substantial differences between the discounted-utilitarian and non-discounted prioritarian SCCs.","number":"6","urldate":"2017-09-19","journal":"Nature Climate Change","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Adler"],"firstnames":["Matthew"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Anthoff"],"firstnames":["David"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bosetti"],"firstnames":["Valentina"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Garner"],"firstnames":["Greg"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Keller"],"firstnames":["Klaus"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Treich"],"firstnames":["Nicolas"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2017","keywords":"KR, Untagged","pages":"443–449","bibtex":"@article{adler_priority_2017,\n\ttitle = {Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon},\n\tvolume = {7},\n\tissn = {1758-678X, 1758-6798},\n\turl = {http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3298},\n\tdoi = {10.1038/nclimate3298},\n\tabstract = {The social cost of carbon (SCC) is a key tool in climate policy. The SCC expresses in monetary terms the social impact of the emission of a ton of CO2 in a given year. The SCC is calculated using a ‘social welfare function’ (SWF): a method for assessing social welfare. The dominant SWFin climate policy is the discounted-utilitarian SWF. Individuals’well-being numbers (utilities) are summed, and the values for later generations are reduced (‘discounted’). This SWF has been criticized for ignoring the distribution of well-being and including an arbitrary time preference. Here, we use a ‘prioritarian’ SWF, with no time discount, to calculate the SCC. This SWF gives extra weight (‘priority’) to worse-off individuals. Prioritarianism is a well-developed concept in ethics and welfare economics, but has been rarely used in climate scholarship. We find substantial differences between the discounted-utilitarian and non-discounted prioritarian SCCs.},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2017-09-19},\n\tjournal = {Nature Climate Change},\n\tauthor = {Adler, Matthew and Anthoff, David and Bosetti, Valentina and Garner, Greg and Keller, Klaus and Treich, Nicolas},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {KR, Untagged},\n\tpages = {443--449},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Adler, M.","Anthoff, D.","Bosetti, V.","Garner, G.","Keller, K.","Treich, N."],"key":"adler_priority_2017","id":"adler_priority_2017","bibbaseid":"adler-anthoff-bosetti-garner-keller-treich-priorityfortheworseoffandthesocialcostofcarbon-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nclimate3298"},"keyword":["KR","Untagged"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/ajello/2099979","dataSources":["EndJaSpcpPJCQnJDH"],"keywords":["kr","untagged"],"search_terms":["priority","worse","social","cost","carbon","adler","anthoff","bosetti","garner","keller","treich"],"title":"Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon","year":2017}