Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room. Allison, R., Howard, I. P., & Zacher, J. E. Perception, 28(3):299-306, 1999. ![Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
-1 doi abstract bibtex The effect of field size, velocity, and visual fixation upon the perception of self-body rotation and tilt was examined in a rotating furnished room. Subjects sat in a stationary chair in the furnished room which could be rotated about the body roll axis. For full-field conditions, complete 360 degrees body rotation (tumbling) was the most common sensation (felt by 80% of subjects). Constant tilt or partial tumbling (less than 360 degrees rotation) occurred more frequently with a small field of view (20 deg). The number of subjects who experienced complete tumbling increased with increases in field of view and room velocity (for velocities between 15 and 30 degrees s\textsuperscript-1). The speed of perceived self-rotation relative to room rotation also increased with increasing field of view.
@article{allison1999299-306,
abstract = {The effect of field size, velocity, and visual fixation upon the perception of self-body rotation and tilt was examined in a rotating furnished room. Subjects sat in a stationary chair in the furnished room which could be rotated about the body roll axis. For full-field conditions, complete 360 degrees body rotation (tumbling) was the most common sensation (felt by 80\% of subjects). Constant tilt or partial tumbling (less than 360 degrees rotation) occurred more frequently with a small field of view (20 deg). The number of subjects who experienced complete tumbling increased with increases in field of view and room velocity (for velocities between 15 and 30 degrees s\textsuperscript{-1}). The speed of perceived self-rotation relative to room rotation also increased with increasing field of view.},
author = {Allison, R.S. and Howard, I. P. and Zacher, J. E.},
date-modified = {2012-07-02 19:22:01 -0400},
doi = {10.1068/p2891},
journal = {Perception},
keywords = {Optic flow & Self Motion (also Locomotion & Aviation)},
number = {3},
pages = {299-306},
title = {Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room},
url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2891},
volume = {28},
year = {1999},
url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1068/p2891}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":{"_str":"51fbd289c5b22c387600105f"},"__v":5,"authorIDs":["5458111c2abc8e9f37000a4d","5e596c1656d60ade0100014f","vnY8GQ5AKXHNi7dqd"],"author_short":["Allison, R.","Howard, I. P.","Zacher, J. E."],"bibbaseid":"allison-howard-zacher-effectoffieldsizeheadmotionandrotationalvelocityonrollvectionandillusoryselftiltinatumblingroom-1999","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"The effect of field size, velocity, and visual fixation upon the perception of self-body rotation and tilt was examined in a rotating furnished room. Subjects sat in a stationary chair in the furnished room which could be rotated about the body roll axis. For full-field conditions, complete 360 degrees body rotation (tumbling) was the most common sensation (felt by 80% of subjects). Constant tilt or partial tumbling (less than 360 degrees rotation) occurred more frequently with a small field of view (20 deg). The number of subjects who experienced complete tumbling increased with increases in field of view and room velocity (for velocities between 15 and 30 degrees s\\textsuperscript-1). The speed of perceived self-rotation relative to room rotation also increased with increasing field of view.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Allison"],"firstnames":["R.S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Howard"],"firstnames":["I.","P."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zacher"],"firstnames":["J.","E."],"suffixes":[]}],"date-modified":"2012-07-02 19:22:01 -0400","doi":"10.1068/p2891","journal":"Perception","keywords":"Optic flow & Self Motion (also Locomotion & Aviation)","number":"3","pages":"299-306","title":"Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room","url-1":"https://doi.org/10.1068/p2891","volume":"28","year":"1999","bibtex":"@article{allison1999299-306,\n\tabstract = {The effect of field size, velocity, and visual fixation upon the perception of self-body rotation and tilt was examined in a rotating furnished room. Subjects sat in a stationary chair in the furnished room which could be rotated about the body roll axis. For full-field conditions, complete 360 degrees body rotation (tumbling) was the most common sensation (felt by 80\\% of subjects). Constant tilt or partial tumbling (less than 360 degrees rotation) occurred more frequently with a small field of view (20 deg). The number of subjects who experienced complete tumbling increased with increases in field of view and room velocity (for velocities between 15 and 30 degrees s\\textsuperscript{-1}). The speed of perceived self-rotation relative to room rotation also increased with increasing field of view.},\n\tauthor = {Allison, R.S. and Howard, I. P. and Zacher, J. E.},\n\tdate-modified = {2012-07-02 19:22:01 -0400},\n\tdoi = {10.1068/p2891},\n\tjournal = {Perception},\n\tkeywords = {Optic flow & Self Motion (also Locomotion & Aviation)},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tpages = {299-306},\n\ttitle = {Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room},\n\turl-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p2891},\n\tvolume = {28},\n\tyear = {1999},\n\turl-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1068/p2891}}\n\n","author_short":["Allison, R.","Howard, I. P.","Zacher, J. E."],"key":"allison1999299-306","id":"allison1999299-306","bibbaseid":"allison-howard-zacher-effectoffieldsizeheadmotionandrotationalvelocityonrollvectionandillusoryselftiltinatumblingroom-1999","role":"author","urls":{"-1":"https://doi.org/10.1068/p2891"},"keyword":["Optic flow & Self Motion (also Locomotion & Aviation)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"allison, r":"https://percept.eecs.yorku.ca/bibase%20pubs.shtml"}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"www.cse.yorku.ca/percept/papers/self.bib","downloads":0,"keywords":["optic flow & self motion (also locomotion & aviation)"],"search_terms":["effect","field","size","head","motion","rotational","velocity","roll","vection","illusory","self","tilt","tumbling","room","allison","howard","zacher"],"title":"Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room","title_words":["effect","field","size","head","motion","rotational","velocity","roll","vection","illusory","self","tilt","tumbling","room"],"year":1999,"dataSources":["kmmXSosvtyJQxBtzs","BPKPSXjrbMGteC59J"]}