Carbon–nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation – Part 1: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling. Flechard, C., R., Ibrom, A., Skiba, U., M., de Vries, W., van Oijen, M., Cameron, D., R., Dise, N., B., Korhonen, J., F., J., Buchmann, N., Legout, A., Simpson, D., Sanz, M., J., Aubinet, M., Loustau, D., Montagnani, L., Neirynck, J., Janssens, I., A., Pihlatie, M., Kiese, R., Siemens, J., Francez, A., Augustin, J., Varlagin, A., Olejnik, J., Juszczak, R., Aurela, M., Berveiller, D., Chojnicki, B., H., Dämmgen, U., Delpierre, N., Djuricic, V., Drewer, J., Dufrêne, E., Eugster, W., Fauvel, Y., Fowler, D., Frumau, A., Granier, A., Gross, P., Hamon, Y., Helfter, C., Hensen, A., Horváth, L., Kitzler, B., Kruijt, B., Kutsch, W., L., Lobo-do-Vale, R., Lohila, A., Longdoz, B., Marek, M., V., Matteucci, G., Mitosinkova, M., Moreaux, V., Neftel, A., Ourcival, J., Pilegaard, K., Pita, G., Sanz, F., Schjoerring, J., K., Sebastià, M., Tang, Y., S., Uggerud, H., Urbaniak, M., van Dijk, N., Vesala, T., Vidic, S., Vincke, C., Weidinger, T., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Nemitz, E., & Sutton, M., A. Biogeosciences, 17(6):1583-1620, 3, 2020.
Carbon–nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation – Part 1: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling [link]Website  doi  abstract   bibtex   
3 g N m−2 yr−1. Such large levels of Nr loss likely indicate that different stages of N saturation occurred at a number of sites. The joint analysis of the C and N budgets provided further hints that N saturation could be detected in altered patterns of forest growth. Net ecosystem productivity increased with Nr deposition up to 2–2.5 g N m−2 yr−1, with large scatter associated with a wide range in carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE, defined as the NEP ∕ GPP ratio). At elevated Ndep levels (> 2.5 g N m−2 yr−1), where inorganic Nr losses were also increasingly large, NEP levelled off and then decreased. The apparent increase in NEP at low to intermediate Ndep levels was partly the result of geographical cross-correlations between Ndep and climate, indicating that the actual mean dC∕dN response at individual sites was significantly lower than would be suggested by a simple, straightforward regression of NEP vs. Ndep.]]>
@article{
 title = {Carbon–nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation – Part 1: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling},
 type = {article},
 year = {2020},
 pages = {1583-1620},
 volume = {17},
 websites = {https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1583/2020/},
 month = {3},
 day = {26},
 id = {1251d217-29f6-3be9-b4cd-c5aad63e1631},
 created = {2021-02-11T10:41:49.005Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {5c1040db-25e3-36ea-a919-0994a44709e7},
 group_id = {c4af41cc-7e3c-3fd3-9982-bdb923596eee},
 last_modified = {2021-03-02T15:39:02.414Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Flechard2020},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {3 g N m−2 yr−1. Such large levels of Nr loss likely indicate that different stages of N saturation occurred at a number of sites. The joint analysis of the C and N budgets provided further hints that N saturation could be detected in altered patterns of forest growth. Net ecosystem productivity increased with Nr deposition up to 2–2.5 g N m−2 yr−1, with large scatter associated with a wide range in carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE, defined as the NEP ∕ GPP ratio). At elevated Ndep levels (> 2.5 g N m−2 yr−1), where inorganic Nr losses were also increasingly large, NEP levelled off and then decreased. The apparent increase in NEP at low to intermediate Ndep levels was partly the result of geographical cross-correlations between Ndep and climate, indicating that the actual mean dC∕dN response at individual sites was significantly lower than would be suggested by a simple, straightforward regression of NEP vs. Ndep.]]>},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Flechard, Chris R. and Ibrom, Andreas and Skiba, Ute M. and de Vries, Wim and van Oijen, Marcel and Cameron, David R. and Dise, Nancy B. and Korhonen, Janne F. J. and Buchmann, Nina and Legout, Arnaud and Simpson, David and Sanz, Maria J. and Aubinet, Marc and Loustau, Denis and Montagnani, Leonardo and Neirynck, Johan and Janssens, Ivan A. and Pihlatie, Mari and Kiese, Ralf and Siemens, Jan and Francez, André-Jean and Augustin, Jürgen and Varlagin, Andrej and Olejnik, Janusz and Juszczak, Radosław and Aurela, Mika and Berveiller, Daniel and Chojnicki, Bogdan H. and Dämmgen, Ulrich and Delpierre, Nicolas and Djuricic, Vesna and Drewer, Julia and Dufrêne, Eric and Eugster, Werner and Fauvel, Yannick and Fowler, David and Frumau, Arnoud and Granier, André and Gross, Patrick and Hamon, Yannick and Helfter, Carole and Hensen, Arjan and Horváth, László and Kitzler, Barbara and Kruijt, Bart and Kutsch, Werner L. and Lobo-do-Vale, Raquel and Lohila, Annalea and Longdoz, Bernard and Marek, Michal V. and Matteucci, Giorgio and Mitosinkova, Marta and Moreaux, Virginie and Neftel, Albrecht and Ourcival, Jean-Marc and Pilegaard, Kim and Pita, Gabriel and Sanz, Francisco and Schjoerring, Jan K. and Sebastià, Maria-Teresa and Tang, Y. Sim and Uggerud, Hilde and Urbaniak, Marek and van Dijk, Netty and Vesala, Timo and Vidic, Sonja and Vincke, Caroline and Weidinger, Tamás and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Sophie and Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus and Nemitz, Eiko and Sutton, Mark A.},
 doi = {10.5194/bg-17-1583-2020},
 journal = {Biogeosciences},
 number = {6}
}

Downloads: 0