Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites: A Diagnostic Approach. Harmon, T. C., Smyth, R. L., Chandra, S., Conde, D., Dhungel, R., Escobar, J., Hoyos, N., Lozoya, J. P., Nin, M., Perillo, G. M. E., Pincetl, S., Piccolo, M. C., Reid, B., Rusak, J. A., Scordo, F., Velez, M. I., Villamizar, S. R., Wemple, B., & Zilio, M. Water, 10(11):1578, November, 2018.
Paper doi abstract bibtex In this work, we develop and test proxy-based diagnostic tools for comparing freshwater ecosystem services (FWES) risks across an international array of freshwater ecosystems. FWES threats are increasing rapidly under pressure from population, climate change, pollution, land use change, and other factors. We identified spatially explicit FWES threats estimates (referred to as threat benchmarks) and extracted watershed-specific values for an array of aquatic ecosystems in the Western Hemisphere (Ramsar sites). We compared these benchmark values to values extracted for sites associated with an international FWES threat investigation. The resulting benchmark threats appeared to provide a meaningful context for the diagnostic assessment of study site selection by revealing gaps in coverage of the underlying socio-environmental problem. In an effort to simplify the method, we tested regularly updated environmental and socioeconomic metrics as potential proxies for the benchmark threats using regression analysis. Three category proxies, aggregated from (i) external (global to regional, climate-related), (ii) internal (watershed management-related), and (iii) socioeconomic and governance related proxies produced strong relationships with water supply threat benchmarks, but only weak relationships with biodiversity-related and nutrient regulation benchmark threats. Our results demonstrate the utility of advancing global FWES status and threat benchmarks for organizing coordinated research efforts and prioritizing decisions with regard to international socio-environmental problems.
@article{harmon_socioeconomic_2018,
title = {Socioeconomic and {Environmental} {Proxies} for {Comparing} {Freshwater} {Ecosystem} {Service} {Threats} across {International} {Sites}: {A} {Diagnostic} {Approach}},
volume = {10},
copyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},
shorttitle = {Socioeconomic and {Environmental} {Proxies} for {Comparing} {Freshwater} {Ecosystem} {Service} {Threats} across {International} {Sites}},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1578},
doi = {10.3390/w10111578},
abstract = {In this work, we develop and test proxy-based diagnostic tools for comparing freshwater ecosystem services (FWES) risks across an international array of freshwater ecosystems. FWES threats are increasing rapidly under pressure from population, climate change, pollution, land use change, and other factors. We identified spatially explicit FWES threats estimates (referred to as threat benchmarks) and extracted watershed-specific values for an array of aquatic ecosystems in the Western Hemisphere (Ramsar sites). We compared these benchmark values to values extracted for sites associated with an international FWES threat investigation. The resulting benchmark threats appeared to provide a meaningful context for the diagnostic assessment of study site selection by revealing gaps in coverage of the underlying socio-environmental problem. In an effort to simplify the method, we tested regularly updated environmental and socioeconomic metrics as potential proxies for the benchmark threats using regression analysis. Three category proxies, aggregated from (i) external (global to regional, climate-related), (ii) internal (watershed management-related), and (iii) socioeconomic and governance related proxies produced strong relationships with water supply threat benchmarks, but only weak relationships with biodiversity-related and nutrient regulation benchmark threats. Our results demonstrate the utility of advancing global FWES status and threat benchmarks for organizing coordinated research efforts and prioritizing decisions with regard to international socio-environmental problems.},
language = {en},
number = {11},
urldate = {2019-07-31},
journal = {Water},
author = {Harmon, Thomas C. and Smyth, Robyn L. and Chandra, Sudeep and Conde, Daniel and Dhungel, Ramesh and Escobar, Jaime and Hoyos, Natalia and Lozoya, Juan Pablo and Nin, Mariana and Perillo, Gerardo M. E. and Pincetl, Stephanie and Piccolo, M. Cintia and Reid, Brian and Rusak, James A. and Scordo, Facundo and Velez, Maria I. and Villamizar, Sandra R. and Wemple, Beverley and Zilio, Mariana},
month = nov,
year = {2018},
keywords = {anthropogenic pressure, ecosystem services, experimental design, human pressure, risk analysis, socio-environmental systems},
pages = {1578}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Hqco43GX5FPSnmipN","bibbaseid":"harmon-smyth-chandra-conde-dhungel-escobar-hoyos-lozoya-etal-socioeconomicandenvironmentalproxiesforcomparingfreshwaterecosystemservicethreatsacrossinternationalsitesadiagnosticapproach-2018","authorIDs":["5d42034d7b2908da01000056","CBYpCKGpoK3nowf7T"],"author_short":["Harmon, T. C.","Smyth, R. L.","Chandra, S.","Conde, D.","Dhungel, R.","Escobar, J.","Hoyos, N.","Lozoya, J. P.","Nin, M.","Perillo, G. M. E.","Pincetl, S.","Piccolo, M. C.","Reid, B.","Rusak, J. A.","Scordo, F.","Velez, M. I.","Villamizar, S. R.","Wemple, B.","Zilio, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites: A Diagnostic Approach","volume":"10","copyright":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","shorttitle":"Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites","url":"https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1578","doi":"10.3390/w10111578","abstract":"In this work, we develop and test proxy-based diagnostic tools for comparing freshwater ecosystem services (FWES) risks across an international array of freshwater ecosystems. FWES threats are increasing rapidly under pressure from population, climate change, pollution, land use change, and other factors. We identified spatially explicit FWES threats estimates (referred to as threat benchmarks) and extracted watershed-specific values for an array of aquatic ecosystems in the Western Hemisphere (Ramsar sites). We compared these benchmark values to values extracted for sites associated with an international FWES threat investigation. The resulting benchmark threats appeared to provide a meaningful context for the diagnostic assessment of study site selection by revealing gaps in coverage of the underlying socio-environmental problem. In an effort to simplify the method, we tested regularly updated environmental and socioeconomic metrics as potential proxies for the benchmark threats using regression analysis. Three category proxies, aggregated from (i) external (global to regional, climate-related), (ii) internal (watershed management-related), and (iii) socioeconomic and governance related proxies produced strong relationships with water supply threat benchmarks, but only weak relationships with biodiversity-related and nutrient regulation benchmark threats. Our results demonstrate the utility of advancing global FWES status and threat benchmarks for organizing coordinated research efforts and prioritizing decisions with regard to international socio-environmental problems.","language":"en","number":"11","urldate":"2019-07-31","journal":"Water","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Harmon"],"firstnames":["Thomas","C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Smyth"],"firstnames":["Robyn","L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chandra"],"firstnames":["Sudeep"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Conde"],"firstnames":["Daniel"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dhungel"],"firstnames":["Ramesh"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Escobar"],"firstnames":["Jaime"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hoyos"],"firstnames":["Natalia"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lozoya"],"firstnames":["Juan","Pablo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nin"],"firstnames":["Mariana"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Perillo"],"firstnames":["Gerardo","M.","E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pincetl"],"firstnames":["Stephanie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Piccolo"],"firstnames":["M.","Cintia"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Reid"],"firstnames":["Brian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rusak"],"firstnames":["James","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Scordo"],"firstnames":["Facundo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Velez"],"firstnames":["Maria","I."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Villamizar"],"firstnames":["Sandra","R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wemple"],"firstnames":["Beverley"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zilio"],"firstnames":["Mariana"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2018","keywords":"anthropogenic pressure, ecosystem services, experimental design, human pressure, risk analysis, socio-environmental systems","pages":"1578","bibtex":"@article{harmon_socioeconomic_2018,\n\ttitle = {Socioeconomic and {Environmental} {Proxies} for {Comparing} {Freshwater} {Ecosystem} {Service} {Threats} across {International} {Sites}: {A} {Diagnostic} {Approach}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Socioeconomic and {Environmental} {Proxies} for {Comparing} {Freshwater} {Ecosystem} {Service} {Threats} across {International} {Sites}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1578},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/w10111578},\n\tabstract = {In this work, we develop and test proxy-based diagnostic tools for comparing freshwater ecosystem services (FWES) risks across an international array of freshwater ecosystems. FWES threats are increasing rapidly under pressure from population, climate change, pollution, land use change, and other factors. We identified spatially explicit FWES threats estimates (referred to as threat benchmarks) and extracted watershed-specific values for an array of aquatic ecosystems in the Western Hemisphere (Ramsar sites). We compared these benchmark values to values extracted for sites associated with an international FWES threat investigation. The resulting benchmark threats appeared to provide a meaningful context for the diagnostic assessment of study site selection by revealing gaps in coverage of the underlying socio-environmental problem. In an effort to simplify the method, we tested regularly updated environmental and socioeconomic metrics as potential proxies for the benchmark threats using regression analysis. Three category proxies, aggregated from (i) external (global to regional, climate-related), (ii) internal (watershed management-related), and (iii) socioeconomic and governance related proxies produced strong relationships with water supply threat benchmarks, but only weak relationships with biodiversity-related and nutrient regulation benchmark threats. Our results demonstrate the utility of advancing global FWES status and threat benchmarks for organizing coordinated research efforts and prioritizing decisions with regard to international socio-environmental problems.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\turldate = {2019-07-31},\n\tjournal = {Water},\n\tauthor = {Harmon, Thomas C. and Smyth, Robyn L. and Chandra, Sudeep and Conde, Daniel and Dhungel, Ramesh and Escobar, Jaime and Hoyos, Natalia and Lozoya, Juan Pablo and Nin, Mariana and Perillo, Gerardo M. E. and Pincetl, Stephanie and Piccolo, M. Cintia and Reid, Brian and Rusak, James A. and Scordo, Facundo and Velez, Maria I. and Villamizar, Sandra R. and Wemple, Beverley and Zilio, Mariana},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tkeywords = {anthropogenic pressure, ecosystem services, experimental design, human pressure, risk analysis, socio-environmental systems},\n\tpages = {1578}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Harmon, T. C.","Smyth, R. L.","Chandra, S.","Conde, D.","Dhungel, R.","Escobar, J.","Hoyos, N.","Lozoya, J. P.","Nin, M.","Perillo, G. M. E.","Pincetl, S.","Piccolo, M. C.","Reid, B.","Rusak, J. A.","Scordo, F.","Velez, M. I.","Villamizar, S. R.","Wemple, B.","Zilio, M."],"key":"harmon_socioeconomic_2018","id":"harmon_socioeconomic_2018","bibbaseid":"harmon-smyth-chandra-conde-dhungel-escobar-hoyos-lozoya-etal-socioeconomicandenvironmentalproxiesforcomparingfreshwaterecosystemservicethreatsacrossinternationalsitesadiagnosticapproach-2018","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1578"},"keyword":["anthropogenic pressure","ecosystem services","experimental design","human pressure","risk analysis","socio-environmental systems"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/3802726/collections/6X4RDRFU/items?key=SE8Bwl1zM1kELiw38G10SDz2&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2019-07-31T21:08:29.744Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["anthropogenic pressure","ecosystem services","experimental design","human pressure","risk analysis","socio-environmental systems"],"search_terms":["socioeconomic","environmental","proxies","comparing","freshwater","ecosystem","service","threats","international","sites","diagnostic","approach","harmon","smyth","chandra","conde","dhungel","escobar","hoyos","lozoya","nin","perillo","pincetl","piccolo","reid","rusak","scordo","velez","villamizar","wemple","zilio"],"title":"Socioeconomic and Environmental Proxies for Comparing Freshwater Ecosystem Service Threats across International Sites: A Diagnostic Approach","year":2018,"dataSources":["mB2EAoyoSD7BNp2Jy"]}