Diet selection in the Coyote Canis latrans. Hayward, M. W, Mitchell, C. D, Kamler, J. F, Rippon, P., Heit, D. R, Nams, V., & Montgomery, R. A Journal of Mammalogy, 104(6):1338–1352, December, 2023. ![Diet selection in the Coyote Canis latrans [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.
@article{hayward_diet_2023,
title = {Diet selection in the {Coyote} {Canis} latrans},
volume = {104},
issn = {0022-2372},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyad094},
doi = {10.1093/jmammal/gyad094},
abstract = {The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.},
number = {6},
urldate = {2024-01-10},
journal = {Journal of Mammalogy},
author = {Hayward, Matt W and Mitchell, Carl D and Kamler, Jan F and Rippon, Paul and Heit, David R and Nams, Vilis and Montgomery, Robert A},
month = dec,
year = {2023},
keywords = {Terrestrial Ecoregions (Wiken 2011)},
pages = {1338--1352},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"RsSzxmTdHHCkKX2DE","bibbaseid":"hayward-mitchell-kamler-rippon-heit-nams-montgomery-dietselectioninthecoyotecanislatrans-2023","author_short":["Hayward, M. W","Mitchell, C. D","Kamler, J. F","Rippon, P.","Heit, D. R","Nams, V.","Montgomery, R. A"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Diet selection in the Coyote Canis latrans","volume":"104","issn":"0022-2372","url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyad094","doi":"10.1093/jmammal/gyad094","abstract":"The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.","number":"6","urldate":"2024-01-10","journal":"Journal of Mammalogy","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hayward"],"firstnames":["Matt","W"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mitchell"],"firstnames":["Carl","D"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kamler"],"firstnames":["Jan","F"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rippon"],"firstnames":["Paul"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Heit"],"firstnames":["David","R"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nams"],"firstnames":["Vilis"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Montgomery"],"firstnames":["Robert","A"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2023","keywords":"Terrestrial Ecoregions (Wiken 2011)","pages":"1338–1352","bibtex":"@article{hayward_diet_2023,\n\ttitle = {Diet selection in the {Coyote} {Canis} latrans},\n\tvolume = {104},\n\tissn = {0022-2372},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyad094},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/jmammal/gyad094},\n\tabstract = {The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2024-01-10},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Mammalogy},\n\tauthor = {Hayward, Matt W and Mitchell, Carl D and Kamler, Jan F and Rippon, Paul and Heit, David R and Nams, Vilis and Montgomery, Robert A},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Terrestrial Ecoregions (Wiken 2011)},\n\tpages = {1338--1352},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Hayward, M. W","Mitchell, C. D","Kamler, J. F","Rippon, P.","Heit, D. R","Nams, V.","Montgomery, R. A"],"key":"hayward_diet_2023","id":"hayward_diet_2023","bibbaseid":"hayward-mitchell-kamler-rippon-heit-nams-montgomery-dietselectioninthecoyotecanislatrans-2023","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyad094"},"keyword":["Terrestrial Ecoregions (Wiken 2011)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/NAAtlas2024","dataSources":["qLjf8q88GSLZ5dAmC"],"keywords":["terrestrial ecoregions (wiken 2011)"],"search_terms":["diet","selection","coyote","canis","latrans","hayward","mitchell","kamler","rippon","heit","nams","montgomery"],"title":"Diet selection in the Coyote Canis latrans","year":2023}