Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases: An intersectional multilevel analysis. Kiadaliri, A. & Englund, M. Arthritis Care & Research, 73(2):296–304, 2021. Number: 2Paper doi abstract bibtex Objective To examine how intersections of multiple sociodemographic variables explain the individual heterogeneity in risk of being diagnosed with any of following chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs): osteoarthritis (OA), gout, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods We identified people aged 40-65 years residing in Skåne, Sweden, by 31st December 2013 and having done so from 1st January 2000 (N=342,542). We used Skåne healthcare register to identify those with a diagnosis of the CRD of interest between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2015 with no previous such diagnosis during 2000-2013. We created 144 intersectional social strata (ISS) using categories of age, gender, education, income, civil status, and immigration. With individuals nested within ISS, we applied multilevel logistic regression models to estimate: 1) variance partition coefficient (VPC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy of the ISS and 2) predicted absolute risks and 95% credible intervals for each stratum. Results In overall, 3.5%, 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of the study population were diagnosed with OA, gout, RA, and SpA, respectively. The VPC ranged from 16.2% for gout to 0.5% for SpA. Gender explained the largest proportion of between-strata variation in risk of RA, gout, and SpA while age was the most important factor for OA. The most between-strata differences in risk of these CRDs were due to the additive main effects. Conclusion Despite meaningful between-strata inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with CRDs (except SpA), there were substantial within-strata heterogeneities that remains unexplained. There were limited evidence of intersectional interaction effects.
@article{kiadaliri_intersectional_2021,
title = {Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases: {An} intersectional multilevel analysis},
volume = {73},
copyright = {© 2019, American College of Rheumatology},
issn = {2151-4658},
shorttitle = {Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acr.24109},
doi = {10.1002/acr.24109},
abstract = {Objective To examine how intersections of multiple sociodemographic variables explain the individual heterogeneity in risk of being diagnosed with any of following chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs): osteoarthritis (OA), gout, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods We identified people aged 40-65 years residing in Skåne, Sweden, by 31st December 2013 and having done so from 1st January 2000 (N=342,542). We used Skåne healthcare register to identify those with a diagnosis of the CRD of interest between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2015 with no previous such diagnosis during 2000-2013. We created 144 intersectional social strata (ISS) using categories of age, gender, education, income, civil status, and immigration. With individuals nested within ISS, we applied multilevel logistic regression models to estimate: 1) variance partition coefficient (VPC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy of the ISS and 2) predicted absolute risks and 95\% credible intervals for each stratum. Results In overall, 3.5\%, 0.5\%, 0.2\%, and 0.2\% of the study population were diagnosed with OA, gout, RA, and SpA, respectively. The VPC ranged from 16.2\% for gout to 0.5\% for SpA. Gender explained the largest proportion of between-strata variation in risk of RA, gout, and SpA while age was the most important factor for OA. The most between-strata differences in risk of these CRDs were due to the additive main effects. Conclusion Despite meaningful between-strata inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with CRDs (except SpA), there were substantial within-strata heterogeneities that remains unexplained. There were limited evidence of intersectional interaction effects.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2019-11-18},
journal = {Arthritis Care \& Research},
author = {Kiadaliri, Ali and Englund, Martin},
year = {2021},
note = {Number: 2},
keywords = {Replace full text},
pages = {296--304},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"j8FzXijLAn895owR3","bibbaseid":"kiadaliri-englund-intersectionalinequalitiesandindividualheterogeneityinchronicrheumaticdiseasesanintersectionalmultilevelanalysis-2021","author_short":["Kiadaliri, A.","Englund, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases: An intersectional multilevel analysis","volume":"73","copyright":"© 2019, American College of Rheumatology","issn":"2151-4658","shorttitle":"Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases","url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acr.24109","doi":"10.1002/acr.24109","abstract":"Objective To examine how intersections of multiple sociodemographic variables explain the individual heterogeneity in risk of being diagnosed with any of following chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs): osteoarthritis (OA), gout, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods We identified people aged 40-65 years residing in Skåne, Sweden, by 31st December 2013 and having done so from 1st January 2000 (N=342,542). We used Skåne healthcare register to identify those with a diagnosis of the CRD of interest between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2015 with no previous such diagnosis during 2000-2013. We created 144 intersectional social strata (ISS) using categories of age, gender, education, income, civil status, and immigration. With individuals nested within ISS, we applied multilevel logistic regression models to estimate: 1) variance partition coefficient (VPC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy of the ISS and 2) predicted absolute risks and 95% credible intervals for each stratum. Results In overall, 3.5%, 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of the study population were diagnosed with OA, gout, RA, and SpA, respectively. The VPC ranged from 16.2% for gout to 0.5% for SpA. Gender explained the largest proportion of between-strata variation in risk of RA, gout, and SpA while age was the most important factor for OA. The most between-strata differences in risk of these CRDs were due to the additive main effects. Conclusion Despite meaningful between-strata inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with CRDs (except SpA), there were substantial within-strata heterogeneities that remains unexplained. There were limited evidence of intersectional interaction effects.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2019-11-18","journal":"Arthritis Care & Research","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kiadaliri"],"firstnames":["Ali"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Englund"],"firstnames":["Martin"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2021","note":"Number: 2","keywords":"Replace full text","pages":"296–304","bibtex":"@article{kiadaliri_intersectional_2021,\n\ttitle = {Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases: {An} intersectional multilevel analysis},\n\tvolume = {73},\n\tcopyright = {© 2019, American College of Rheumatology},\n\tissn = {2151-4658},\n\tshorttitle = {Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acr.24109},\n\tdoi = {10.1002/acr.24109},\n\tabstract = {Objective To examine how intersections of multiple sociodemographic variables explain the individual heterogeneity in risk of being diagnosed with any of following chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs): osteoarthritis (OA), gout, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods We identified people aged 40-65 years residing in Skåne, Sweden, by 31st December 2013 and having done so from 1st January 2000 (N=342,542). We used Skåne healthcare register to identify those with a diagnosis of the CRD of interest between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2015 with no previous such diagnosis during 2000-2013. We created 144 intersectional social strata (ISS) using categories of age, gender, education, income, civil status, and immigration. With individuals nested within ISS, we applied multilevel logistic regression models to estimate: 1) variance partition coefficient (VPC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy of the ISS and 2) predicted absolute risks and 95\\% credible intervals for each stratum. Results In overall, 3.5\\%, 0.5\\%, 0.2\\%, and 0.2\\% of the study population were diagnosed with OA, gout, RA, and SpA, respectively. The VPC ranged from 16.2\\% for gout to 0.5\\% for SpA. Gender explained the largest proportion of between-strata variation in risk of RA, gout, and SpA while age was the most important factor for OA. The most between-strata differences in risk of these CRDs were due to the additive main effects. Conclusion Despite meaningful between-strata inequalities in the risk of being diagnosed with CRDs (except SpA), there were substantial within-strata heterogeneities that remains unexplained. There were limited evidence of intersectional interaction effects.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2019-11-18},\n\tjournal = {Arthritis Care \\& Research},\n\tauthor = {Kiadaliri, Ali and Englund, Martin},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tkeywords = {Replace full text},\n\tpages = {296--304},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kiadaliri, A.","Englund, M."],"key":"kiadaliri_intersectional_2021","id":"kiadaliri_intersectional_2021","bibbaseid":"kiadaliri-englund-intersectionalinequalitiesandindividualheterogeneityinchronicrheumaticdiseasesanintersectionalmultilevelanalysis-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acr.24109"},"keyword":["Replace full text"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/5155143/items?key=IVTAjWy1U5EkGJqE2Z2qQCfh&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["7PYyrRz6AvkoBBchz","5jEuhQhgRx3py8LmG","LPTeGao77ndnG4Tks"],"keywords":["replace full text"],"search_terms":["intersectional","inequalities","individual","heterogeneity","chronic","rheumatic","diseases","intersectional","multilevel","analysis","kiadaliri","englund"],"title":"Intersectional inequalities and individual heterogeneity in chronic rheumatic diseases: An intersectional multilevel analysis","year":2021}