Influence of Grazing on Canola Grain, Canola Forage Yield, and Beef Cattle Performance. Lauriault, L. M., Angadi, S. V., Duff, G. C., Scholljegerdes, E. J., Darapuneni, M. K., & Martinez, G. K. Animals, 14(3):371, January, 2024. Number: 3 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute![Influence of Grazing on Canola Grain, Canola Forage Yield, and Beef Cattle Performance [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Interest is increasing in grazing winter canola (Brassica napus) as an alternative crop in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations in the Southern High Plains (SHP) of the USA and similar environments. In this stidy, winter cereal rye (Secale cereale) and winter canola pastures (forage) were compared for two winter growing seasons at New Mexico State University’s Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, NM, USA, to determine the relative effect of pasture type on late-gestation beef cows and growing yearling cattle, along with the effect of grazing on canola grain production. Canola grain yields were reduced by 25% when canola was grazed until removal approximately one month after grazing was initiated, but before the onset of rapid regrowth after winter (641 vs. 486 kg grain ha−1 for never grazed or grazed canola, respectively, p \textless 0.0256). No differences existed for forage mass, nutritive value, or animal performance, although forage mineral composition of canola could be a concern. Grazing winter canola as a dual-purpose crop in the SHP and similar environments is feasible when proper grazing management is applied; producers should anticipate a 20–25% reduction in grain yield, but expect animal gains to offset that loss.
@article{lauriault_influence_2024,
title = {Influence of {Grazing} on {Canola} {Grain}, {Canola} {Forage} {Yield}, and {Beef} {Cattle} {Performance}},
volume = {14},
copyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},
issn = {2076-2615},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/3/371},
doi = {10.3390/ani14030371},
abstract = {Interest is increasing in grazing winter canola (Brassica napus) as an alternative crop in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations in the Southern High Plains (SHP) of the USA and similar environments. In this stidy, winter cereal rye (Secale cereale) and winter canola pastures (forage) were compared for two winter growing seasons at New Mexico State University’s Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, NM, USA, to determine the relative effect of pasture type on late-gestation beef cows and growing yearling cattle, along with the effect of grazing on canola grain production. Canola grain yields were reduced by 25\% when canola was grazed until removal approximately one month after grazing was initiated, but before the onset of rapid regrowth after winter (641 vs. 486 kg grain ha−1 for never grazed or grazed canola, respectively, p {\textless} 0.0256). No differences existed for forage mass, nutritive value, or animal performance, although forage mineral composition of canola could be a concern. Grazing winter canola as a dual-purpose crop in the SHP and similar environments is feasible when proper grazing management is applied; producers should anticipate a 20–25\% reduction in grain yield, but expect animal gains to offset that loss.},
language = {en},
number = {3},
urldate = {2024-01-31},
journal = {Animals},
author = {Lauriault, Leonard M. and Angadi, Sangu V. and Duff, Glenn C. and Scholljegerdes, Eric J. and Darapuneni, Murali K. and Martinez, Gasper K.},
month = jan,
year = {2024},
note = {Number: 3
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},
keywords = {Climate Zones},
pages = {371},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"M3Zv3r6rAwYWWRmfC","bibbaseid":"lauriault-angadi-duff-scholljegerdes-darapuneni-martinez-influenceofgrazingoncanolagraincanolaforageyieldandbeefcattleperformance-2024","author_short":["Lauriault, L. M.","Angadi, S. V.","Duff, G. C.","Scholljegerdes, E. J.","Darapuneni, M. K.","Martinez, G. K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Influence of Grazing on Canola Grain, Canola Forage Yield, and Beef Cattle Performance","volume":"14","copyright":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","issn":"2076-2615","url":"https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/3/371","doi":"10.3390/ani14030371","abstract":"Interest is increasing in grazing winter canola (Brassica napus) as an alternative crop in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations in the Southern High Plains (SHP) of the USA and similar environments. In this stidy, winter cereal rye (Secale cereale) and winter canola pastures (forage) were compared for two winter growing seasons at New Mexico State University’s Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, NM, USA, to determine the relative effect of pasture type on late-gestation beef cows and growing yearling cattle, along with the effect of grazing on canola grain production. Canola grain yields were reduced by 25% when canola was grazed until removal approximately one month after grazing was initiated, but before the onset of rapid regrowth after winter (641 vs. 486 kg grain ha−1 for never grazed or grazed canola, respectively, p \\textless 0.0256). No differences existed for forage mass, nutritive value, or animal performance, although forage mineral composition of canola could be a concern. Grazing winter canola as a dual-purpose crop in the SHP and similar environments is feasible when proper grazing management is applied; producers should anticipate a 20–25% reduction in grain yield, but expect animal gains to offset that loss.","language":"en","number":"3","urldate":"2024-01-31","journal":"Animals","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lauriault"],"firstnames":["Leonard","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Angadi"],"firstnames":["Sangu","V."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Duff"],"firstnames":["Glenn","C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Scholljegerdes"],"firstnames":["Eric","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Darapuneni"],"firstnames":["Murali","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Martinez"],"firstnames":["Gasper","K."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2024","note":"Number: 3 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute","keywords":"Climate Zones","pages":"371","bibtex":"@article{lauriault_influence_2024,\n\ttitle = {Influence of {Grazing} on {Canola} {Grain}, {Canola} {Forage} {Yield}, and {Beef} {Cattle} {Performance}},\n\tvolume = {14},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tissn = {2076-2615},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/3/371},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/ani14030371},\n\tabstract = {Interest is increasing in grazing winter canola (Brassica napus) as an alternative crop in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations in the Southern High Plains (SHP) of the USA and similar environments. In this stidy, winter cereal rye (Secale cereale) and winter canola pastures (forage) were compared for two winter growing seasons at New Mexico State University’s Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, NM, USA, to determine the relative effect of pasture type on late-gestation beef cows and growing yearling cattle, along with the effect of grazing on canola grain production. Canola grain yields were reduced by 25\\% when canola was grazed until removal approximately one month after grazing was initiated, but before the onset of rapid regrowth after winter (641 vs. 486 kg grain ha−1 for never grazed or grazed canola, respectively, p {\\textless} 0.0256). No differences existed for forage mass, nutritive value, or animal performance, although forage mineral composition of canola could be a concern. Grazing winter canola as a dual-purpose crop in the SHP and similar environments is feasible when proper grazing management is applied; producers should anticipate a 20–25\\% reduction in grain yield, but expect animal gains to offset that loss.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2024-01-31},\n\tjournal = {Animals},\n\tauthor = {Lauriault, Leonard M. and Angadi, Sangu V. and Duff, Glenn C. and Scholljegerdes, Eric J. and Darapuneni, Murali K. and Martinez, Gasper K.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Number: 3\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {Climate Zones},\n\tpages = {371},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Lauriault, L. M.","Angadi, S. V.","Duff, G. C.","Scholljegerdes, E. J.","Darapuneni, M. K.","Martinez, G. K."],"key":"lauriault_influence_2024","id":"lauriault_influence_2024","bibbaseid":"lauriault-angadi-duff-scholljegerdes-darapuneni-martinez-influenceofgrazingoncanolagraincanolaforageyieldandbeefcattleperformance-2024","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/3/371"},"keyword":["Climate Zones"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/NAAtlas2024","dataSources":["qLjf8q88GSLZ5dAmC"],"keywords":["climate zones"],"search_terms":["influence","grazing","canola","grain","canola","forage","yield","beef","cattle","performance","lauriault","angadi","duff","scholljegerdes","darapuneni","martinez"],"title":"Influence of Grazing on Canola Grain, Canola Forage Yield, and Beef Cattle Performance","year":2024}