Diel ecosystem conductance response to vapor pressure deficit is suboptimal and independent of soil moisture. Lin, C., Gentine, P., Huang, Y., Guan, K., Kimm, H., & Zhou, S. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 250-251(June 2017):24-34, Elsevier, 2018.
Diel ecosystem conductance response to vapor pressure deficit is suboptimal and independent of soil moisture [link]Website  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Ecosystem conductance, which describes ecosystem regulation of water and carbon exchange and links plant functions with the environment, is a critical component in ecosystem and earth system models. However, the behaviors of ecosystem conductance at the ecosystem level and its responses to environmental conditions are still largely unclear. In this study, half-hourly data of 77 eddy-covariance sites from the FLUXNET2015 dataset were used to compare four ecosystem conductance models at the ecosystem level and determine the most consistent vapor pressure deficit (VPD) dependence across plant functional types for varying soil moisture stress levels at the subdaily time scale. We used leaf-level VPD (VPD l ), a better indicator of atmospheric dryness at the leaf level, for canopy-level analysis instead of measured atmospheric VPD. Detection of the best-fitted exponent of VPD l indicates that ecosystem conductance responds to VPD between optimality-theory (i.e., VPD −0.5 dependence) and Leuning's (i.e., VPD −1 dependence) models. Accounting for different soil moisture stress levels only affected minimum ecosystem conductance and did not affect the exponent and factor of VPD l , indicating limited diurnal soil moisture-VPD l interactions. These results indicate limited interaction between xylem and stomata at subdaily time scales and that soil moisture effects can be simplified as a regulation of minimum (soil plus canopy) conductance.
@article{
 title = {Diel ecosystem conductance response to vapor pressure deficit is suboptimal and independent of soil moisture},
 type = {article},
 year = {2018},
 keywords = {FR_GRI,FR_LBR},
 pages = {24-34},
 volume = {250-251},
 websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.078},
 publisher = {Elsevier},
 id = {98314412-ee36-3739-a38b-f6eb8e4b99a9},
 created = {2019-05-20T12:20:22.898Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {5c1040db-25e3-36ea-a919-0994a44709e7},
 group_id = {c4af41cc-7e3c-3fd3-9982-bdb923596eee},
 last_modified = {2020-09-08T15:25:48.015Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Lin2018},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {Ecosystem conductance, which describes ecosystem regulation of water and carbon exchange and links plant functions with the environment, is a critical component in ecosystem and earth system models. However, the behaviors of ecosystem conductance at the ecosystem level and its responses to environmental conditions are still largely unclear. In this study, half-hourly data of 77 eddy-covariance sites from the FLUXNET2015 dataset were used to compare four ecosystem conductance models at the ecosystem level and determine the most consistent vapor pressure deficit (VPD) dependence across plant functional types for varying soil moisture stress levels at the subdaily time scale. We used leaf-level VPD (VPD l ), a better indicator of atmospheric dryness at the leaf level, for canopy-level analysis instead of measured atmospheric VPD. Detection of the best-fitted exponent of VPD l indicates that ecosystem conductance responds to VPD between optimality-theory (i.e., VPD −0.5 dependence) and Leuning's (i.e., VPD −1 dependence) models. Accounting for different soil moisture stress levels only affected minimum ecosystem conductance and did not affect the exponent and factor of VPD l , indicating limited diurnal soil moisture-VPD l interactions. These results indicate limited interaction between xylem and stomata at subdaily time scales and that soil moisture effects can be simplified as a regulation of minimum (soil plus canopy) conductance.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Lin, Changjie and Gentine, Pierre and Huang, Yuefei and Guan, Kaiyu and Kimm, Hyungsuk and Zhou, Sha},
 doi = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.078},
 journal = {Agricultural and Forest Meteorology},
 number = {June 2017}
}

Downloads: 0