Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals. Liu, A., Cheng, X., & Chen, Z. Remote Sensing of Environment, 264:112571, October, 2021. Publisher: Elsevier Inc.![Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex With the advent of the next generation of space-based laser altimeters, ICESat-2 and GEDI, we are entering an exciting era of active remote sensing of forests that offers unprecedented opportunities for the observation of forest structure. Consistent comparisons of the accuracy of terrain and canopy height retrievals for these two missions are essential for continued improvement and further application. Because the time interval between the spaceborne products and validation data may introduce additional errors, we validate the newly released GEDI L2A product (version 2) and the ICESat-2 ATL08 product (version 4) using high-resolution, locally calibrated airborne lidar products acquired in the same year (2019) as the reference datasets. In addition, our study area contains 40 sites located in the U.S. mainland, Alaska, and Hawaii that encompass a variety of eco-climatic zones and vegetation cover types; thus, it avoids the uncertainties associated with small sample sizes and restricted spatial coverage. The results show that ICESat-2 and GEDI yield reasonable estimates of terrain height, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.24 and 4.03 m for mid and low latitudes, respectively, and 0.98 m for high latitudes (ICESat-2 only). ICESat-2 outperforms GEDI across the board for terrain height retrieval, although they both have better accuracy than existing SRTM and GMTED DEM products. Analyses of the error factors suggest that steep slopes (\textgreater30°) present the greatest challenge for both GEDI and ICESat-2; in addition, tall (\textgreater20 m) and dense canopies (\textgreater90%) forest ecosystems also reduce the accuracy of the terrain height estimates. When ICESat-2 and GEDI data are used for canopy height retrieval, the use of only strong/power beam data acquired at night is recommended, as the overall RMSEs decrease from 7.21 and 5.02 m to 3.93 and 3.56 m, respectively, compared to using all data regardless of daytime and beam strength. GEDI outperforms ICESat-2 across the board for canopy height retrieval, as ICESat-2 has a larger potential bias for almost all forest types and cover conditions. ICESat-2 tends to overestimate the canopy height of dwarf shrublands and underestimate the canopy height of forest, and there is a gradual downward shift in the distribution of residuals with increasing canopy height. Overall, ICESat-2 with photon counting technology and GEDI with full waveform technology each represent the state of the art in spaceborne laser altimeters for terrain and canopy height retrieval. Combined, these two missions can take advantage of the unique strengths of each instrument.
@article{liu_performance_2021,
title = {Performance evaluation of {GEDI} and {ICESat}-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals},
volume = {264},
issn = {00344257},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425721002911},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571},
abstract = {With the advent of the next generation of space-based laser altimeters, ICESat-2 and GEDI, we are entering an exciting era of active remote sensing of forests that offers unprecedented opportunities for the observation of forest structure. Consistent comparisons of the accuracy of terrain and canopy height retrievals for these two missions are essential for continued improvement and further application. Because the time interval between the spaceborne products and validation data may introduce additional errors, we validate the newly released GEDI L2A product (version 2) and the ICESat-2 ATL08 product (version 4) using high-resolution, locally calibrated airborne lidar products acquired in the same year (2019) as the reference datasets. In addition, our study area contains 40 sites located in the U.S. mainland, Alaska, and Hawaii that encompass a variety of eco-climatic zones and vegetation cover types; thus, it avoids the uncertainties associated with small sample sizes and restricted spatial coverage. The results show that ICESat-2 and GEDI yield reasonable estimates of terrain height, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.24 and 4.03 m for mid and low latitudes, respectively, and 0.98 m for high latitudes (ICESat-2 only). ICESat-2 outperforms GEDI across the board for terrain height retrieval, although they both have better accuracy than existing SRTM and GMTED DEM products. Analyses of the error factors suggest that steep slopes ({\textgreater}30°) present the greatest challenge for both GEDI and ICESat-2; in addition, tall ({\textgreater}20 m) and dense canopies ({\textgreater}90\%) forest ecosystems also reduce the accuracy of the terrain height estimates. When ICESat-2 and GEDI data are used for canopy height retrieval, the use of only strong/power beam data acquired at night is recommended, as the overall RMSEs decrease from 7.21 and 5.02 m to 3.93 and 3.56 m, respectively, compared to using all data regardless of daytime and beam strength. GEDI outperforms ICESat-2 across the board for canopy height retrieval, as ICESat-2 has a larger potential bias for almost all forest types and cover conditions. ICESat-2 tends to overestimate the canopy height of dwarf shrublands and underestimate the canopy height of forest, and there is a gradual downward shift in the distribution of residuals with increasing canopy height. Overall, ICESat-2 with photon counting technology and GEDI with full waveform technology each represent the state of the art in spaceborne laser altimeters for terrain and canopy height retrieval. Combined, these two missions can take advantage of the unique strengths of each instrument.},
journal = {Remote Sensing of Environment},
author = {Liu, Aobo and Cheng, Xiao and Chen, Zhuoqi},
month = oct,
year = {2021},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {NALCMS},
pages = {112571},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"cA4z9XqZqYBdHrGpB","bibbaseid":"liu-cheng-chen-performanceevaluationofgediandicesat2laseraltimeterdataforterrainandcanopyheightretrievals-2021","author_short":["Liu, A.","Cheng, X.","Chen, Z."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals","volume":"264","issn":"00344257","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425721002911","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571","abstract":"With the advent of the next generation of space-based laser altimeters, ICESat-2 and GEDI, we are entering an exciting era of active remote sensing of forests that offers unprecedented opportunities for the observation of forest structure. Consistent comparisons of the accuracy of terrain and canopy height retrievals for these two missions are essential for continued improvement and further application. Because the time interval between the spaceborne products and validation data may introduce additional errors, we validate the newly released GEDI L2A product (version 2) and the ICESat-2 ATL08 product (version 4) using high-resolution, locally calibrated airborne lidar products acquired in the same year (2019) as the reference datasets. In addition, our study area contains 40 sites located in the U.S. mainland, Alaska, and Hawaii that encompass a variety of eco-climatic zones and vegetation cover types; thus, it avoids the uncertainties associated with small sample sizes and restricted spatial coverage. The results show that ICESat-2 and GEDI yield reasonable estimates of terrain height, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.24 and 4.03 m for mid and low latitudes, respectively, and 0.98 m for high latitudes (ICESat-2 only). ICESat-2 outperforms GEDI across the board for terrain height retrieval, although they both have better accuracy than existing SRTM and GMTED DEM products. Analyses of the error factors suggest that steep slopes (\\textgreater30°) present the greatest challenge for both GEDI and ICESat-2; in addition, tall (\\textgreater20 m) and dense canopies (\\textgreater90%) forest ecosystems also reduce the accuracy of the terrain height estimates. When ICESat-2 and GEDI data are used for canopy height retrieval, the use of only strong/power beam data acquired at night is recommended, as the overall RMSEs decrease from 7.21 and 5.02 m to 3.93 and 3.56 m, respectively, compared to using all data regardless of daytime and beam strength. GEDI outperforms ICESat-2 across the board for canopy height retrieval, as ICESat-2 has a larger potential bias for almost all forest types and cover conditions. ICESat-2 tends to overestimate the canopy height of dwarf shrublands and underestimate the canopy height of forest, and there is a gradual downward shift in the distribution of residuals with increasing canopy height. Overall, ICESat-2 with photon counting technology and GEDI with full waveform technology each represent the state of the art in spaceborne laser altimeters for terrain and canopy height retrieval. Combined, these two missions can take advantage of the unique strengths of each instrument.","journal":"Remote Sensing of Environment","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Liu"],"firstnames":["Aobo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cheng"],"firstnames":["Xiao"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chen"],"firstnames":["Zhuoqi"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2021","note":"Publisher: Elsevier Inc.","keywords":"NALCMS","pages":"112571","bibtex":"@article{liu_performance_2021,\n\ttitle = {Performance evaluation of {GEDI} and {ICESat}-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals},\n\tvolume = {264},\n\tissn = {00344257},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425721002911},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571},\n\tabstract = {With the advent of the next generation of space-based laser altimeters, ICESat-2 and GEDI, we are entering an exciting era of active remote sensing of forests that offers unprecedented opportunities for the observation of forest structure. Consistent comparisons of the accuracy of terrain and canopy height retrievals for these two missions are essential for continued improvement and further application. Because the time interval between the spaceborne products and validation data may introduce additional errors, we validate the newly released GEDI L2A product (version 2) and the ICESat-2 ATL08 product (version 4) using high-resolution, locally calibrated airborne lidar products acquired in the same year (2019) as the reference datasets. In addition, our study area contains 40 sites located in the U.S. mainland, Alaska, and Hawaii that encompass a variety of eco-climatic zones and vegetation cover types; thus, it avoids the uncertainties associated with small sample sizes and restricted spatial coverage. The results show that ICESat-2 and GEDI yield reasonable estimates of terrain height, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 2.24 and 4.03 m for mid and low latitudes, respectively, and 0.98 m for high latitudes (ICESat-2 only). ICESat-2 outperforms GEDI across the board for terrain height retrieval, although they both have better accuracy than existing SRTM and GMTED DEM products. Analyses of the error factors suggest that steep slopes ({\\textgreater}30°) present the greatest challenge for both GEDI and ICESat-2; in addition, tall ({\\textgreater}20 m) and dense canopies ({\\textgreater}90\\%) forest ecosystems also reduce the accuracy of the terrain height estimates. When ICESat-2 and GEDI data are used for canopy height retrieval, the use of only strong/power beam data acquired at night is recommended, as the overall RMSEs decrease from 7.21 and 5.02 m to 3.93 and 3.56 m, respectively, compared to using all data regardless of daytime and beam strength. GEDI outperforms ICESat-2 across the board for canopy height retrieval, as ICESat-2 has a larger potential bias for almost all forest types and cover conditions. ICESat-2 tends to overestimate the canopy height of dwarf shrublands and underestimate the canopy height of forest, and there is a gradual downward shift in the distribution of residuals with increasing canopy height. Overall, ICESat-2 with photon counting technology and GEDI with full waveform technology each represent the state of the art in spaceborne laser altimeters for terrain and canopy height retrieval. Combined, these two missions can take advantage of the unique strengths of each instrument.},\n\tjournal = {Remote Sensing of Environment},\n\tauthor = {Liu, Aobo and Cheng, Xiao and Chen, Zhuoqi},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Elsevier Inc.},\n\tkeywords = {NALCMS},\n\tpages = {112571},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Liu, A.","Cheng, X.","Chen, Z."],"key":"liu_performance_2021","id":"liu_performance_2021","bibbaseid":"liu-cheng-chen-performanceevaluationofgediandicesat2laseraltimeterdataforterrainandcanopyheightretrievals-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425721002911"},"keyword":["NALCMS"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/NAAtlas2024","dataSources":["yRJdyJoax6GFubwNS","wszmZbW485BrvbZff","3fS6y29xitMxSyCmw","SmeabbQSEFozkXJuC","3cx6m8LrzQx6SsjF2","qLjf8q88GSLZ5dAmC"],"keywords":["nalcms"],"search_terms":["performance","evaluation","gedi","icesat","laser","altimeter","data","terrain","canopy","height","retrievals","liu","cheng","chen"],"title":"Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals","year":2021}