@INPROCEEDINGS{Moha07-WOOR-DesignDefects,
   AUTHOR       = {Naouel Moha and Yann-Ga�l Gu�h�neuc and Laurence Duchien and 
      Le Meur, Anne-Fran�oise},
   BOOKTITLE    = {Proceedings of the 8<sup>th</sup> ECOOP workshop on Object-Oriented Reengineering (WOOR)},
   TITLE        = {Discussion on the Results of the Detection of Design 
      Defects},
   YEAR         = {2007},
   OPTADDRESS   = {},
   OPTCROSSREF  = {},
   EDITOR       = {Serge Demeyer and Yann-Ga�l Gu�h�neuc and 
      Christian Lange and Kim Mens and Roel Wuyts and St�phane Ducasse},
   MONTH        = {July--August},
   NOTE         = {6 pages.},
   OPTNUMBER    = {},
   OPTORGANIZATION = {},
   PAGES        = {N/A},
   PUBLISHER    = {N/A},
   OPTSERIES    = {},
   OPTVOLUME    = {},
   KEYWORDS     = {Topic: <b>Code and design smells</b>, 
      Venue: <i>WOOR</i>},
   URL          = {http://www.ptidej.net/publications/documents/ECOOP07WOOR.doc.pdf},
   ABSTRACT     = {Software engineers often need to identify in their 
      systems ``poor" design choices---design defects---that hinder the 
      development and maintenance, as opportunities of improvements and as 
      a measure of the quality of their systems. However, the detection of 
      design defects is difficult because of the lack of specifications and 
      tools. We propose DECOR, a method to specify design defects 
      systematically and to generate automatically detection algorithms. 
      With this method, software engineers analyse and specify design 
      defects at a high-level of abstraction using a unified vocabulary and 
      a dedicated language for generating detection algorithms. To 
      illustrate our method, in this paper, we specify 4 well-known design 
      defects, the antipatterns Blob, Functional Decomposition, Spaghetti 
      Code, and Swiss Army Knife and their 15 underlying code smells and we 
      generate automatically their detection algorithms. We apply and 
      validate the detection algorithms in terms of precision and recall 
      and discuss the precision of these algorithms on 11 open-source 
      object-oriented systems.}
}

{"_id":"QMQCmxQu42nzhPsuo","bibbaseid":"moha-guhneuc-duchien-lemeur-discussionontheresultsofthedetectionofdesigndefects-2007","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-01-17T20:29:42.545Z","title":"Discussion on the Results of the Detection of Design Defects","author_short":["Moha, N.","Gu�h�neuc, Y.","Duchien, L.","Le Meur, A."],"year":2007,"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"http://www.yann-gael.gueheneuc.net/Work/Publications/Biblio/complete-bibliography.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","author":[{"firstnames":["Naouel"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moha"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Yann-Ga�l"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gu�h�neuc"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Laurence"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Duchien"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Le","Meur"],"firstnames":["Anne-Fran�oise"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Proceedings of the 8^th ECOOP workshop on Object-Oriented Reengineering (WOOR)","title":"Discussion on the Results of the Detection of Design Defects","year":"2007","optaddress":"","optcrossref":"","editor":[{"firstnames":["Serge"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Demeyer"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Yann-Ga�l"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gu�h�neuc"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Christian"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lange"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Kim"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mens"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Roel"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wuyts"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["St�phane"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ducasse"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July–August","note":"6 pages.","optnumber":"","optorganization":"","pages":"N/A","publisher":"N/A","optseries":"","optvolume":"","keywords":"Topic: <b>Code and design smells</b>, Venue: <i>WOOR</i>","url":"http://www.ptidej.net/publications/documents/ECOOP07WOOR.doc.pdf","abstract":"Software engineers often need to identify in their systems ``poor\" design choices—design defects—that hinder the development and maintenance, as opportunities of improvements and as a measure of the quality of their systems. However, the detection of design defects is difficult because of the lack of specifications and tools. We propose DECOR, a method to specify design defects systematically and to generate automatically detection algorithms. With this method, software engineers analyse and specify design defects at a high-level of abstraction using a unified vocabulary and a dedicated language for generating detection algorithms. To illustrate our method, in this paper, we specify 4 well-known design defects, the antipatterns Blob, Functional Decomposition, Spaghetti Code, and Swiss Army Knife and their 15 underlying code smells and we generate automatically their detection algorithms. We apply and validate the detection algorithms in terms of precision and recall and discuss the precision of these algorithms on 11 open-source object-oriented systems.","bibtex":"@INPROCEEDINGS{Moha07-WOOR-DesignDefects,\r\n AUTHOR = {Naouel Moha and Yann-Ga�l Gu�h�neuc and Laurence Duchien and \r\n Le Meur, Anne-Fran�oise},\r\n BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 8<sup>th</sup> ECOOP workshop on Object-Oriented Reengineering (WOOR)},\r\n TITLE = {Discussion on the Results of the Detection of Design \r\n Defects},\r\n YEAR = {2007},\r\n OPTADDRESS = {},\r\n OPTCROSSREF = {},\r\n EDITOR = {Serge Demeyer and Yann-Ga�l Gu�h�neuc and \r\n Christian Lange and Kim Mens and Roel Wuyts and St�phane Ducasse},\r\n MONTH = {July--August},\r\n NOTE = {6 pages.},\r\n OPTNUMBER = {},\r\n OPTORGANIZATION = {},\r\n PAGES = {N/A},\r\n PUBLISHER = {N/A},\r\n OPTSERIES = {},\r\n OPTVOLUME = {},\r\n KEYWORDS = {Topic: <b>Code and design smells</b>, \r\n Venue: <i>WOOR</i>},\r\n URL = {http://www.ptidej.net/publications/documents/ECOOP07WOOR.doc.pdf},\r\n ABSTRACT = {Software engineers often need to identify in their \r\n systems ``poor\" design choices---design defects---that hinder the \r\n development and maintenance, as opportunities of improvements and as \r\n a measure of the quality of their systems. However, the detection of \r\n design defects is difficult because of the lack of specifications and \r\n tools. We propose DECOR, a method to specify design defects \r\n systematically and to generate automatically detection algorithms. \r\n With this method, software engineers analyse and specify design \r\n defects at a high-level of abstraction using a unified vocabulary and \r\n a dedicated language for generating detection algorithms. To \r\n illustrate our method, in this paper, we specify 4 well-known design \r\n defects, the antipatterns Blob, Functional Decomposition, Spaghetti \r\n Code, and Swiss Army Knife and their 15 underlying code smells and we \r\n generate automatically their detection algorithms. We apply and \r\n validate the detection algorithms in terms of precision and recall \r\n and discuss the precision of these algorithms on 11 open-source \r\n object-oriented systems.}\r\n}\r\n\r\n","author_short":["Moha, N.","Gu�h�neuc, Y.","Duchien, L.","Le Meur, A."],"editor_short":["Demeyer, S.","Gu�h�neuc, Y.","Lange, C.","Mens, K.","Wuyts, R.","Ducasse, S."],"key":"Moha07-WOOR-DesignDefects","id":"Moha07-WOOR-DesignDefects","bibbaseid":"moha-guhneuc-duchien-lemeur-discussionontheresultsofthedetectionofdesigndefects-2007","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.ptidej.net/publications/documents/ECOOP07WOOR.doc.pdf"},"keyword":["Topic: <b>Code and design smells</b>","Venue: <i>WOOR</i>"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"gu�h�neuc, y":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yann-gael.gueheneuc.net%2FWork%2FPublications%2FBiblio%2Fcomplete-bibliography.bib&msg=embed","guéhéneuc, y":"http://www.yann-gael.gueheneuc.net/"}}},"search_terms":["discussion","results","detection","design","defects","moha","gu�h�neuc","duchien","le meur"],"keywords":["topic: <b>code and design smells</b>","venue: <i>woor</i>"],"authorIDs":["AfJhKcg96muyPdu7S","xkviMnkrGBneANvMr"],"dataSources":["Sed98LbBeGaXxenrM","8vn5MSGYWB4fAx9Z4"]}