Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities. Schmidt, J. I., Ziel, R. H., Calef, M. P., & Varvak, A. Natural Hazards, January, 2024. ![Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Increased wildfire activity has raised concerns among communities about how to assess and prepare for this threat. There is a need for wildfire hazard assessment approaches that capture local variability to inform decisions, produce results understood by the public, and are updatable in a timely manner. We modified an existing approach to assess decadal wildfire hazards based primarily on ember dispersal and wildfire proximity, referencing landscape changes from 1984 through 2014. Our modifications created a categorical flammability hazard scheme, rather than dichotomous, and integrated wildfire exposure results across spatial scales. We used remote sensed land cover from four historical decadal points to create flammability hazard and wildfire exposure maps for three arctic communities (Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska and Whitehorse, Yukon). Within the Fairbanks study area, we compared 2014 flammability hazard, wildfire exposure, and FlamMap burn probabilities among burned (2014–2023) and unburned areas. Unlike burn probabilities, there were significantly higher in exposure values among burned and unburned locations (Wilcoxon; p \textless 0.001) and exposure rose as flammability hazard classes increased (Kruskal–Wallis; p \textless 0.001). Very high flammability hazard class supported 75% of burned areas and burns tended to occur in areas with 60% exposure or greater. Areas with high exposure values are more prone to burn and thus desirable for mitigation actions. By working with wildfire practitioners and communities, we created a tool that rapidly assesses wildfire hazards and is easily modified to help identify and prioritize mitigation activities.
@article{schmidt_spatial_2024,
title = {Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities},
issn = {1573-0840},
shorttitle = {Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4},
doi = {10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4},
abstract = {Increased wildfire activity has raised concerns among communities about how to assess and prepare for this threat. There is a need for wildfire hazard assessment approaches that capture local variability to inform decisions, produce results understood by the public, and are updatable in a timely manner. We modified an existing approach to assess decadal wildfire hazards based primarily on ember dispersal and wildfire proximity, referencing landscape changes from 1984 through 2014. Our modifications created a categorical flammability hazard scheme, rather than dichotomous, and integrated wildfire exposure results across spatial scales. We used remote sensed land cover from four historical decadal points to create flammability hazard and wildfire exposure maps for three arctic communities (Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska and Whitehorse, Yukon). Within the Fairbanks study area, we compared 2014 flammability hazard, wildfire exposure, and FlamMap burn probabilities among burned (2014–2023) and unburned areas. Unlike burn probabilities, there were significantly higher in exposure values among burned and unburned locations (Wilcoxon; p {\textless} 0.001) and exposure rose as flammability hazard classes increased (Kruskal–Wallis; p {\textless} 0.001). Very high flammability hazard class supported 75\% of burned areas and burns tended to occur in areas with 60\% exposure or greater. Areas with high exposure values are more prone to burn and thus desirable for mitigation actions. By working with wildfire practitioners and communities, we created a tool that rapidly assesses wildfire hazards and is easily modified to help identify and prioritize mitigation activities.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2024-03-13},
journal = {Natural Hazards},
author = {Schmidt, Jennifer I. and Ziel, Robert H. and Calef, Monika P. and Varvak, Anna},
month = jan,
year = {2024},
keywords = {NALCMS},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Ps7wW66Z5jyc42ssA","bibbaseid":"schmidt-ziel-calef-varvak-spatialdistributionofwildfirethreatinthefarnorthexposureassessmentinborealcommunities-2024","author_short":["Schmidt, J. I.","Ziel, R. H.","Calef, M. P.","Varvak, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities","issn":"1573-0840","shorttitle":"Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4","doi":"10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4","abstract":"Increased wildfire activity has raised concerns among communities about how to assess and prepare for this threat. There is a need for wildfire hazard assessment approaches that capture local variability to inform decisions, produce results understood by the public, and are updatable in a timely manner. We modified an existing approach to assess decadal wildfire hazards based primarily on ember dispersal and wildfire proximity, referencing landscape changes from 1984 through 2014. Our modifications created a categorical flammability hazard scheme, rather than dichotomous, and integrated wildfire exposure results across spatial scales. We used remote sensed land cover from four historical decadal points to create flammability hazard and wildfire exposure maps for three arctic communities (Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska and Whitehorse, Yukon). Within the Fairbanks study area, we compared 2014 flammability hazard, wildfire exposure, and FlamMap burn probabilities among burned (2014–2023) and unburned areas. Unlike burn probabilities, there were significantly higher in exposure values among burned and unburned locations (Wilcoxon; p \\textless 0.001) and exposure rose as flammability hazard classes increased (Kruskal–Wallis; p \\textless 0.001). Very high flammability hazard class supported 75% of burned areas and burns tended to occur in areas with 60% exposure or greater. Areas with high exposure values are more prone to burn and thus desirable for mitigation actions. By working with wildfire practitioners and communities, we created a tool that rapidly assesses wildfire hazards and is easily modified to help identify and prioritize mitigation activities.","language":"en","urldate":"2024-03-13","journal":"Natural Hazards","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schmidt"],"firstnames":["Jennifer","I."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ziel"],"firstnames":["Robert","H."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Calef"],"firstnames":["Monika","P."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Varvak"],"firstnames":["Anna"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2024","keywords":"NALCMS","bibtex":"@article{schmidt_spatial_2024,\n\ttitle = {Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities},\n\tissn = {1573-0840},\n\tshorttitle = {Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4},\n\tabstract = {Increased wildfire activity has raised concerns among communities about how to assess and prepare for this threat. There is a need for wildfire hazard assessment approaches that capture local variability to inform decisions, produce results understood by the public, and are updatable in a timely manner. We modified an existing approach to assess decadal wildfire hazards based primarily on ember dispersal and wildfire proximity, referencing landscape changes from 1984 through 2014. Our modifications created a categorical flammability hazard scheme, rather than dichotomous, and integrated wildfire exposure results across spatial scales. We used remote sensed land cover from four historical decadal points to create flammability hazard and wildfire exposure maps for three arctic communities (Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska and Whitehorse, Yukon). Within the Fairbanks study area, we compared 2014 flammability hazard, wildfire exposure, and FlamMap burn probabilities among burned (2014–2023) and unburned areas. Unlike burn probabilities, there were significantly higher in exposure values among burned and unburned locations (Wilcoxon; p {\\textless} 0.001) and exposure rose as flammability hazard classes increased (Kruskal–Wallis; p {\\textless} 0.001). Very high flammability hazard class supported 75\\% of burned areas and burns tended to occur in areas with 60\\% exposure or greater. Areas with high exposure values are more prone to burn and thus desirable for mitigation actions. By working with wildfire practitioners and communities, we created a tool that rapidly assesses wildfire hazards and is easily modified to help identify and prioritize mitigation activities.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2024-03-13},\n\tjournal = {Natural Hazards},\n\tauthor = {Schmidt, Jennifer I. and Ziel, Robert H. and Calef, Monika P. and Varvak, Anna},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tkeywords = {NALCMS},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Schmidt, J. I.","Ziel, R. H.","Calef, M. P.","Varvak, A."],"key":"schmidt_spatial_2024","id":"schmidt_spatial_2024","bibbaseid":"schmidt-ziel-calef-varvak-spatialdistributionofwildfirethreatinthefarnorthexposureassessmentinborealcommunities-2024","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06365-4"},"keyword":["NALCMS"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/NAAtlas2024","dataSources":["qLjf8q88GSLZ5dAmC"],"keywords":["nalcms"],"search_terms":["spatial","distribution","wildfire","threat","far","north","exposure","assessment","boreal","communities","schmidt","ziel","calef","varvak"],"title":"Spatial distribution of wildfire threat in the far north: exposure assessment in boreal communities","year":2024}