Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views. Vernazza, C., Durham, J., Ellis, J., Teasdale, D., Cotterill, S., Scott, L., Thomason, M., Drummond, P., & Moss, J. European Journal of Dental Education, 15(1):36–41, 2011. 00010![Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Abstract Introduction: An electronic portfolio was introduced for undergraduate students in the School of Dental Sciences at Newcastle University. Its introduction was evaluated in terms of both staff and student response. Methods: A quantitative-qualitative methodology was adopted. Student views were examined quantitatively using a Likert scale based questionnaire both pre- and post-introduction of the eportfolio. Staff views were examined qualitatively by the use of focus groups. Results and discussion: Findings included that the system was easy to use and it provided a large quantity of high quality data. The aim of the system to improve reflection and feedback was not perceived as a benefit by staff or students. The need for training was highlighted and a major disadvantage of the system was its time consuming nature. The evaluation has lead to further development of the system and continued evaluation will be important.
@article{vernazza_introduction_2011,
title = {Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views},
volume = {15},
issn = {1600-0579},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x},
abstract = {Abstract Introduction: An electronic portfolio was introduced for undergraduate students in the School of Dental Sciences at Newcastle University. Its introduction was evaluated in terms of both staff and student response. Methods: A quantitative-qualitative methodology was adopted. Student views were examined quantitatively using a Likert scale based questionnaire both pre- and post-introduction of the eportfolio. Staff views were examined qualitatively by the use of focus groups. Results and discussion: Findings included that the system was easy to use and it provided a large quantity of high quality data. The aim of the system to improve reflection and feedback was not perceived as a benefit by staff or students. The need for training was highlighted and a major disadvantage of the system was its time consuming nature. The evaluation has lead to further development of the system and continued evaluation will be important.},
number = {1},
journal = {European Journal of Dental Education},
author = {Vernazza, C. and Durham, J. and Ellis, J. and Teasdale, D. and Cotterill, S. and Scott, L. and Thomason, M. and Drummond, P. and Moss, J.},
year = {2011},
note = {00010},
keywords = {Assessment, feedback, portfolio, reflection, undergraduate},
pages = {36--41},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"c3ANrCosX5NxGYyu8","bibbaseid":"vernazza-durham-ellis-teasdale-cotterill-scott-thomason-drummond-etal-introductionofaneportfolioinclinicaldentistrystaffandstudentviews-2011","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-12-22T18:54:07.254Z","title":"Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views","author_short":["Vernazza, C.","Durham, J.","Ellis, J.","Teasdale, D.","Cotterill, S.","Scott, L.","Thomason, M.","Drummond, P.","Moss, J."],"year":2011,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/23510/collections/D2XAEG4R/items?key=Yk2kABeKdpCCcq9NJbPGEejt&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views","volume":"15","issn":"1600-0579","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x","abstract":"Abstract Introduction: An electronic portfolio was introduced for undergraduate students in the School of Dental Sciences at Newcastle University. Its introduction was evaluated in terms of both staff and student response. Methods: A quantitative-qualitative methodology was adopted. Student views were examined quantitatively using a Likert scale based questionnaire both pre- and post-introduction of the eportfolio. Staff views were examined qualitatively by the use of focus groups. Results and discussion: Findings included that the system was easy to use and it provided a large quantity of high quality data. The aim of the system to improve reflection and feedback was not perceived as a benefit by staff or students. The need for training was highlighted and a major disadvantage of the system was its time consuming nature. The evaluation has lead to further development of the system and continued evaluation will be important.","number":"1","journal":"European Journal of Dental Education","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vernazza"],"firstnames":["C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Durham"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ellis"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Teasdale"],"firstnames":["D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cotterill"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Scott"],"firstnames":["L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Thomason"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Drummond"],"firstnames":["P."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moss"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2011","note":"00010","keywords":"Assessment, feedback, portfolio, reflection, undergraduate","pages":"36–41","bibtex":"@article{vernazza_introduction_2011,\n\ttitle = {Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: staff and student views},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {1600-0579},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x},\n\tabstract = {Abstract Introduction: An electronic portfolio was introduced for undergraduate students in the School of Dental Sciences at Newcastle University. Its introduction was evaluated in terms of both staff and student response. Methods: A quantitative-qualitative methodology was adopted. Student views were examined quantitatively using a Likert scale based questionnaire both pre- and post-introduction of the eportfolio. Staff views were examined qualitatively by the use of focus groups. Results and discussion: Findings included that the system was easy to use and it provided a large quantity of high quality data. The aim of the system to improve reflection and feedback was not perceived as a benefit by staff or students. The need for training was highlighted and a major disadvantage of the system was its time consuming nature. The evaluation has lead to further development of the system and continued evaluation will be important.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {European Journal of Dental Education},\n\tauthor = {Vernazza, C. and Durham, J. and Ellis, J. and Teasdale, D. and Cotterill, S. and Scott, L. and Thomason, M. and Drummond, P. and Moss, J.},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {00010},\n\tkeywords = {Assessment, feedback, portfolio, reflection, undergraduate},\n\tpages = {36--41},\n}\n","author_short":["Vernazza, C.","Durham, J.","Ellis, J.","Teasdale, D.","Cotterill, S.","Scott, L.","Thomason, M.","Drummond, P.","Moss, J."],"key":"vernazza_introduction_2011","id":"vernazza_introduction_2011","bibbaseid":"vernazza-durham-ellis-teasdale-cotterill-scott-thomason-drummond-etal-introductionofaneportfolioinclinicaldentistrystaffandstudentviews-2011","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x"},"keyword":["Assessment","feedback","portfolio","reflection","undergraduate"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["introduction","portfolio","clinical","dentistry","staff","student","views","vernazza","durham","ellis","teasdale","cotterill","scott","thomason","drummond","moss"],"keywords":["assessment","feedback","portfolio","reflection","undergraduate"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["R7BqAmWghbBYBMikN"]}