@misc{betti_semantic_2018,
	address = {Cape Town},
	type = {Keynote {Lecture}},
	title = {Semantic {Web} techniques for the study of large-scale philosophical corpora [postponed to 2020]},
	url = {http://fois2018.cs.uct.ac.za/?page_id=10},
	abstract = {In this talk I present a novel, experimental and ongoing application of ontologies developed within *eIdeas*, a project aiming at creating a computational methodology for the history of ideas. 

The overall goal of *eIdeas* is to scale up research in humanities fields concerned with tracing concept drift in large textual corpora without sacrificing interpretive depth. The core idea is to combine top down and bottom up computational techniques, namely conceptual modelling for (expert) knowledge representation via description logics on the one hand, and NLP techniques (mostly word embeddings) on the other hand.

In the application I will introduce, we use semantic web techniques (ontologies and reasoners) to help experts decide in favor or against alternative philosophical interpretations of a well-defined textual corpus. The corpus consists of a substantial part of the complete *oeuvre* of an important 19th century thinker, the Bohemian polymath Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848). I will cover general methodological considerations, validation, and results, and wrap up with challenges and future work.},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {Hungerbühler, Silvan and van Wierst, Pauline and Carretta Zamborlini, Veruska},
	month = sep,
	year = {2018},
	note = {FOIS 2018},
}

In this talk I present a novel, experimental and ongoing application of ontologies developed within *eIdeas*, a project aiming at creating a computational methodology for the history of ideas. The overall goal of *eIdeas* is to scale up research in humanities fields concerned with tracing concept drift in large textual corpora without sacrificing interpretive depth. The core idea is to combine top down and bottom up computational techniques, namely conceptual modelling for (expert) knowledge representation via description logics on the one hand, and NLP techniques (mostly word embeddings) on the other hand. In the application I will introduce, we use semantic web techniques (ontologies and reasoners) to help experts decide in favor or against alternative philosophical interpretations of a well-defined textual corpus. The corpus consists of a substantial part of the complete *oeuvre* of an important 19th century thinker, the Bohemian polymath Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848). I will cover general methodological considerations, validation, and results, and wrap up with challenges and future work.

@misc{betti_conceptual_2018,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	type = {Keynote {Lecture}},
	title = {Conceptual {Schemes}: a small history in {Ones} and {Zeroes}},
	abstract = {The notion of *conceptual scheme* is of key philosophical significance. Its origin, development, and spread are nevertheless unclear. Several purely qualitative and competing historical hypotheses have been offered, which rely on disconnected disciplinary traditions, and have never been tested all at once in a single comprehensive investigation fitting the scope of its subject matter. As a step toward such an investigation, I present an ongoing study in which we trace the use of the bigram “conceptual scheme” in a large corpus of tens of thousands of US journal articles from 1888-1969 in philosophy, psychology, anthropology, sociology and linguistics. We use a novel method combining a quantitative procedure aided by basic computational techniques with qualitative elements informed by Betti and van den Berg (2014)’s ‘model approach to the history of ideas’.},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {van den Berg, Hein and Bloem, Jelke and Oortwijn, Yvette and Treijtel, Caspar},
	month = nov,
	year = {2018},
	note = {Mathematics and its Philosophy between the 18th and the 19th Century, Amsterdam, 13-14 Juy 2018},
}

The notion of *conceptual scheme* is of key philosophical significance. Its origin, development, and spread are nevertheless unclear. Several purely qualitative and competing historical hypotheses have been offered, which rely on disconnected disciplinary traditions, and have never been tested all at once in a single comprehensive investigation fitting the scope of its subject matter. As a step toward such an investigation, I present an ongoing study in which we trace the use of the bigram “conceptual scheme” in a large corpus of tens of thousands of US journal articles from 1888-1969 in philosophy, psychology, anthropology, sociology and linguistics. We use a novel method combining a quantitative procedure aided by basic computational techniques with qualitative elements informed by Betti and van den Berg (2014)’s ‘model approach to the history of ideas’.

@misc{betti_computational_2018,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	type = {Invited {Lecture}},
	title = {Computational {Tools} in the {History} of {Ideas} [canceled]},
	url = {https://philmathsbolzano.wordpress.com/},
	abstract = {In this talk I introduce a number of computational techniques and tools that can be fruitfully applied to the history of philosophy, and challenges that arise from using them. The talk is based on recent hands-on experience with these techniques and tools within the \_Concepts in Motion\_ group (conceptsinmotion.org). I will touch upon tools and techniques for (i) OCR and corpus building, (ii) corpus preprocessing, (iii) text-mining using (largely bottom-up) both information retrieval, word embeddings and deep NLP,  (iv) (top down) conceptual modelling and (v) visualisation. Challenges include evaluation and reliability of the computational approach.},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jul,
	year = {2018},
	note = {Mathematics and its Philosophy between the 18th and the 19th Century, Amsterdam, 13-14 Juy 2018},
}

In this talk I introduce a number of computational techniques and tools that can be fruitfully applied to the history of philosophy, and challenges that arise from using them. The talk is based on recent hands-on experience with these techniques and tools within the _Concepts in Motion_ group (conceptsinmotion.org). I will touch upon tools and techniques for (i) OCR and corpus building, (ii) corpus preprocessing, (iii) text-mining using (largely bottom-up) both information retrieval, word embeddings and deep NLP, (iv) (top down) conceptual modelling and (v) visualisation. Challenges include evaluation and reliability of the computational approach.

@misc{betti_creating_2017,
	address = {Torino},
	type = {Invited {Lecture}},
	title = {Creating a computational history of ideas},
	url = {http://www.filosofia.unito.it/dr2/},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {van den Berg, Hein},
	month = jan,
	year = {2017},
	note = {Distant Reading and Data-Driven Research in the History of Philosophy, DR2 Conference, University of Turin, 16-18 January 2017},
}

@misc{betti_creating_2017-1,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {Creating a computational history of ideas},
	url = {https://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/gastvortrag-prof-dr-arianna-betti},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {van den Berg, Hein},
	month = jan,
	year = {2017},
	note = {Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Philosophie},
}

@misc{betti_taking_2016,
	address = {Luxembourg},
	title = {Taking the computational turn in the {History} of {Ideas}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2016},
}

@misc{betti_glammapping_2016,
	address = {Melbourne},
	title = {{GlamMapping} {Trove}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Verbeek, Kevin},
	month = feb,
	year = {2016},
}

@misc{betti_glammapping_2016-1,
	address = {Canberra},
	title = {{GlamMapping} {Trove}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Castermans, Thom},
	month = feb,
	year = {2016},
	note = {Canberra, University of, Faculty of Arts \& Design (Heritage, Museums and Conservation/Center for Creative, and Cultural Research)   (AUS)},
}

@misc{betti_against_2016,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Against {Facts}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2016},
}

@misc{betti_taking_2016-1,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Taking the computational turn in the {History} of {Ideas}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2016},
}

@misc{betti_concepts_2015,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	type = {Invited {Talk}},
	title = {Concepts in {Motion} - {Constructing} the {Future} of the {History} of {Logic}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = oct,
	year = {2015},
}

@misc{betti_e-quine_2015,
	address = {Glasgow},
	title = {e-{Quine}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = dec,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_against_2015,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Against {Facts}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_concepts_2015-1,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Concepts in motion (inaugural lecture)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_enabling_2015,
	address = {Beeld\&Geluid, Hilversum},
	title = {Enabling the {Revolution} - {Or} prospects for and challenges of a sound computational turn illustrated by an example from the history of ideas},
	url = {http://www.clariah.nl/activiteiten/clariah-kick-off},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = mar,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_fact-making_2015,
	address = {Ascona},
	title = {Fact-making [canceled]},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_lovejoys_2015,
	address = {Portoroz},
	title = {Lovejoy's {Dream}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_modelling_2015,
	address = {Utrecht},
	title = {Modelling the {History} of {Ideas}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_philostei_2015,
	address = {Leiden},
	title = {{PhilosTEI}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2015},
}

@book{betti_concepts_2014,
	address = {Linköping},
	title = {Concepts in {Motion}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2014},
}

@book{betti_north-south_2014,
	address = {Santiago de Chile},
	title = {North-{South} {Strongly} {Interdisciplinary} {Project} {Grants}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2014},
}

@book{betti_plans_2014,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Plans and {Claims} {II}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2014},
}

@book{betti_naming_2014,
	address = {Göteborg},
	title = {The {Naming} of {Facts}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2014},
}

@book{betti_phenomenological_2014,
	address = {Dubrovnik},
	title = {The {Phenomenological} {Roots} of {Truthmaking}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2014},
}

@book{betti_plans_2013,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Plans and {Claims} {I}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2013},
}

@book{betti_phenomenological_2013,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {The {Phenomenological} {Roots} of {Truthmaking}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2013},
}

@book{van_den_berg_computer_2013,
	address = {Utrecht},
	title = {Computer {Tools} for the {History} of {Philosophy}},
	author = {van den Berg, Hein},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna and van Wierst, Pauline},
	month = nov,
	year = {2013},
}

@book{betti_introduction:_2013,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Introduction: {Digital} {Humanities} and {Philosophy}},
	url = {http://axiom.vu.nl/activities.html},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	month = jun,
	year = {2013},
}

@book{betti_modeling_2013,
	address = {Ghent},
	title = {Modeling the {History} of {Ideas}},
	url = {http://www.inth.ugent.be/?page_id=2927},
	abstract = {The history of ideas has long been a discipline in disrepute. It has
been criticized as involving an improper historical method that does
not provide understanding of historical texts. The aim of this paper
is to propose a worked out method for the history of ideas that has
none of the shortcomings traditionally ascribed to this approach. We
call this method the model approach to history of ideas. We argue that
a satisfactorily worked out and implementable method to trace
(dis)continuities in the history of human thought (or concept drift)
requires historians to use explicit interpretive conceptual
frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We show in what sense the
use of models solves two major shortcomings of existing defenses of
history of ideas. First, at present we have only a vocabulary, and not
yet a proper implementable method for history of ideas. Second,
holistic objections remain unanswered and so does Skinner’s criticism
that history of ideas is a biased account resulting in arbitrary
narratives. We counter holism by assuming a metaphysically neutral
stance on ideas or concepts. We counter Skinner in two ways: (i) We
reinterpret Kuukkanen's recent conventionalistic core/margin approach
in a realistic fashion; (ii) We maintain that the ideas we can do
history of properly are (highly complex) ideas we can capture in
models, i.e. explicit and schematic representations of the manifold
relations among the elements of the complex idea or concept
constituting the object of investigation. Such schematic
representations increase the comprehension of historical texts, allow
us to reconstruct the intentions of authors, and provide historians of
ideas with a method that is not susceptible to common holist
criticisms. To illustrate our proposal, we discuss the so-called
Classical Model of Science and discuss work in computer science and
cognitive psychology.},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	month = jul,
	year = {2013},
}

The history of ideas has long been a discipline in disrepute. It has been criticized as involving an improper historical method that does not provide understanding of historical texts. The aim of this paper is to propose a worked out method for the history of ideas that has none of the shortcomings traditionally ascribed to this approach. We call this method the model approach to history of ideas. We argue that a satisfactorily worked out and implementable method to trace (dis)continuities in the history of human thought (or concept drift) requires historians to use explicit interpretive conceptual frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We show in what sense the use of models solves two major shortcomings of existing defenses of history of ideas. First, at present we have only a vocabulary, and not yet a proper implementable method for history of ideas. Second, holistic objections remain unanswered and so does Skinner’s criticism that history of ideas is a biased account resulting in arbitrary narratives. We counter holism by assuming a metaphysically neutral stance on ideas or concepts. We counter Skinner in two ways: (i) We reinterpret Kuukkanen's recent conventionalistic core/margin approach in a realistic fashion; (ii) We maintain that the ideas we can do history of properly are (highly complex) ideas we can capture in models, i.e. explicit and schematic representations of the manifold relations among the elements of the complex idea or concept constituting the object of investigation. Such schematic representations increase the comprehension of historical texts, allow us to reconstruct the intentions of authors, and provide historians of ideas with a method that is not susceptible to common holist criticisms. To illustrate our proposal, we discuss the so-called Classical Model of Science and discuss work in computer science and cognitive psychology.

@book{betti_bolzano_2013,
	address = {Paris},
	title = {Bolzano and {Impeccable} {Explanations}: {The} {State} of the {Art}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2013},
}

@book{betti_computational_2013,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Computational {Tools} for the {History} of {Philosophy}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {van Wierst, Pauline and van den Berg, Hein},
	month = aug,
	year = {2013},
}

@book{betti_mapping_2012,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Mapping {Philosophy}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein and Speckmann, Bettina and Verbeek, Kevin},
	month = apr,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_existence_2012,
	address = {Göteborg},
	title = {Existence, {Explanatory} {Power} and {Ad} {Hocness} in {Metaphysics} - {The} case of the {Unity} {Problem} and {Its} {Solutions}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_classical_2012,
	address = {Nijmegen},
	title = {The {Classical} {Model} of {Science} as an interpretive tool for {Ideengeschichte}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_bolzanos_2012,
	address = {Oslo},
	title = {Bolzano's {Grounding} as a {Formal} {Relation}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Roski, Stefan},
	month = sep,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_question_2012,
	address = {Rotterdam},
	title = {A {Question} of {Method} - {The} {Classical} {Model} of {Science} as an 'ideengeschichtlich' interpretive tool for the history of the deductive sciences},
	url = {axiom.vu.nl/~arianna},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = mar,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_open_2012,
	address = {Pretoria},
	title = {Open {Science} and {Sustainability} - {Is} there a role for young researchers in reinventing academia?},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{loeb_tarski_2012,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Tarski, what is the sum of two solids? {Mereology}, topology, {Boolean} algebra},
	author = {Loeb, Iris},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2012},
}

@book{betti_jongs_2011,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {De {Jongs} {Klassieke} {Wetenschapsmodel} als cognitief schema},
	language = {Dutch},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_explanation_2011,
	address = {Groningen},
	title = {Explanation and {Logical} {Consequence} from {Bolzano} to {Tarski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_explanation_2011-1,
	address = {Brussels},
	title = {Explanation and {Logical} {Consequence} from {Bolzano} to {Tarski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_parti_2011,
	address = {Pisa},
	title = {Parti di complessi, constituenti di fatti},
	language = {Italian},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = mar,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_philosophy_2011,
	address = {Hamburg},
	title = {Philosophy in the {Google} {Era} - {New} {Methodologies}, research policy trends and training needs in the humanities},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_classical_2011,
	address = {Nijmegen},
	title = {The {Classical} {Model} of {Science} as an interpretive tool for {Ideengeschichte}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_philosophy_2011-1,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {Philosophy in the {Google} {Era} - {New} {Methodologies}, research policy trends and training needs in the humanities},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = mar,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_fact_2011,
	address = {Durham},
	title = {The fact that p},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{betti_fact_2011-1,
	address = {Melbourne},
	title = {The fact that p},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jan,
	year = {2011},
}

@book{loeb_tarskis_2010,
	address = {Utrecht},
	title = {On {Tarski}'s {Foundations} of the {Geometry} of {Solids}},
	author = {Loeb, Iris},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{betti_tarskis_2010,
	address = {Krakow},
	title = {On {Tarski}'s {Foundations} of the {Geometry} of {Solids}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Loeb, Iris},
	month = oct,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{betti_bolzano_2010,
	address = {Bergamo},
	title = {Bolzano, il regresso di {Bradley} e la  prospettiva mereologica},
	language = {Italian},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{betti_whats_2010,
	address = {Prague},
	title = {What's wrong with {Bolzano}'s definition of grounding in {WL}§200?},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{betti_wissenschaftslehre_2010,
	address = {Prague},
	title = {Wissenschaftslehre {Wiki}: {A} {Collaborative} {Project} in {ICT} \& {Humanities}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{loeb_bernard_2010,
	address = {Rotterdam},
	title = {Bernard {Bolzano} {Portal}},
	author = {Loeb, Iris},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna and Sikkel, Constantijn and Roski, Stefan},
	month = jun,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{loeb_tarskis_2010-1,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {On {Tarski}'s {Foundations} of the {Geometry} of {Solids}},
	author = {Loeb, Iris},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{loeb_layers_2010,
	address = {Nijmegen},
	title = {The {Layers} of {Tarski}'s "{Foundations} of the {Geometry} of {Solids}"},
	author = {Loeb, Iris},
	collaborator = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2010},
}

@book{betti_bolzano_2009,
	address = {Utrecht},
	title = {Bolzano, {Tarski} and the '{Common}' {Notion} of {Consequence}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2009},
}

@book{betti_unity_2009,
	address = {Dublin},
	title = {The {Unity} {Problem}, {Armstrong}'s {States} of {Affairs} and {Mereological} {Responsibility}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = feb,
	year = {2009},
}

@book{betti_because_2009,
	address = {Ghent},
	title = {Because and {Ontological} {Grounding}: {A} {Bolzanian} {Perspective}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2009},
}

@book{betti_bolzano_2009-1,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Bolzano, {Tarski} and the '{Common}' {Notion} of {Consequence}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = feb,
	year = {2009},
}

@book{betti_explanation_2009,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Explanation in {Metaphysics} and {Bolzano}'s {Theory} of {Ground} and {Consequence}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2009},
}

@book{betti_bolzano_2008,
	address = {Riga},
	title = {Bolzano, {Tarski} and the '{Common}' {Concept} of {Consequence}: {The} {Ajdukiewicz} {Connection}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = aug,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_gluing_2008,
	address = {Helsinki},
	title = {Gluing {Facts}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = oct,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_words_2008,
	address = {Lund},
	title = {Of {Words} and {Facts} - {On} the {Use} and the {Role} of {Linguistic} {Arguments} for {Facts} in {Metaphysics}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_words_2008-1,
	address = {Krakow},
	title = {Of {Words} and {Facts} - {On} the {Use} and the {Role} of {Linguistic} {Arguments} for {Facts} in {Metaphysics}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = aug,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_words_2008-2,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Of {Words} and {Facts} - {On} the {Use} and the {Role} of {Linguistic} {Arguments} for {Facts} in {Metaphysics}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_twardowski_2008,
	address = {Chicago},
	title = {Twardowski and the {Discovery} of {States} of {Affairs}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_bradley_2008,
	address = {Geneva},
	title = {Bradley {Regress} and {Mereological} {Responsibility}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = dec,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_gluing_2008-1,
	address = {Turku},
	title = {Gluing {Facts}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = oct,
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_over_2008,
	address = {Groningen},
	title = {"{Over} {Bernard} {Bolzano} - ""{The} {Greatest} {Philosopher} of the 19th {Century}, {Bar} {None}"""},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2008},
}

@book{betti_metametaphysical_2006,
	address = {Lund},
	title = {({Meta})metaphysical {Arguments}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = oct,
	year = {2006},
}

@book{betti_symptoms_2006,
	address = {Kronovall},
	title = {Symptoms of {State}-of-{Affairness} - {A} {Check}-list and some {Test}-{Cases}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2006},
}

@book{betti_contro_2005,
	address = {Pisa},
	title = {Contro i fatti},
	language = {Italian},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jul,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_introduction:_2005,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Introduction: {The} {Aristotelian} {Model} of {Science}: a {Millennia}-{Old} {Model} of {Scientific} {Rationality} (closed workshop)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_no_2005,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {On “{No} {Difference} without a {Difference} {Maker}”. {Reply} to {Achille} {C}. {Varzi}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_ontologia_2005,
	address = {Padua},
	title = {Ontologia della verità in {Bolzano}? {Davvero}?},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_twardowski_2005,
	address = {Padua},
	title = {"{Twardowski} e la scoperta del {Sachverhalt} - su ""{Logik} 1894/5' "},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_logics_2005,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Logic's {Ariadne}'s {Thread} - {Lesniewski}'s {Characteristica} {Universalis} and the {Aristotelian} {Model} of {Science} (closed workshop)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jun,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_twardowski_2005-1,
	address = {Paris},
	title = {Twardowski and the {Discovery} of the {Sachverhalt} - {On} {Logik} 1894/5},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_willem_2005,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Willem {R}. de {Jong}, {Argumentatie} en formele structuur - {Basisboek} logica, {Amsterdam}, {Boom}, 2005},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2005},
}

@book{betti_logic_2004,
	address = {Turku},
	title = {Logic as {Universal} {Medium}? {Lesniewski}'s {Systems} and the {Aristotelian} {Model} of {Science}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = jul,
	year = {2004},
}

@book{betti_twardowski_2004,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Twardowski and {Presentism}, {Now}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2004},
}

@book{betti_plea_2004,
	address = {Utrecht},
	title = {A {Plea} for {Presentism}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2004},
}

@book{betti_logic_2004-1,
	address = {Montreal},
	title = {Logic as {Universal} {Medium}? {Lesniewski}'s {Systems} and the {Aristotelian} {Model} of {Science}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = sep,
	year = {2004},
}

@book{betti_varieta_2004,
	address = {Urbino},
	title = {Varietà nella (supposta) giungla. {Risposta} a {Alberto} {Voltolini}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {2004},
}

@book{betti_world_2003,
	address = {Nijmegen},
	title = {A {World} without {States} of {Affairs}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2003},
}

@book{betti_een_2003,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Een wereld zonder standen van zaken},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = apr,
	year = {2003},
}

@book{betti_propositions_2003,
	address = {Paris},
	title = {Propositions et \_tats de choses chez {Twardowski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2003},
}

@book{betti_dal_2002,
	address = {Urbino},
	title = {Dal complesso al {Sachverhalt}. {Sul} corrispettivo ontologico di proposizioni e giudizi in {Bolzano} e {Twardowski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2002},
}

@book{betti_early_2001,
	address = {Warsaw},
	title = {An {Early} {Lesniewskian} {Solution} to the {Liar} and {Tarski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2001},
}

@book{betti_twardowskis_2001,
	address = {Geneva},
	title = {Twardowskis {Misunderstandings} of {Bolzano} and its {Polish} {Consequences}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = oct,
	year = {2001},
}

@book{betti_donne_2000,
	address = {Camogli},
	title = {Le donne nella filosofia mitteleuropea},
	language = {Italian},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = may,
	year = {2000},
}

@book{betti_tomorrow_2000,
	address = {Konstanz},
	title = {Tomorrow {You} {Get} a {Beer} for {Free} - {Truth} and {Time} in the {Austro}-{Polish} {Tradition}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2000},
}

@book{betti_bolzano_1998,
	address = {Salzburg},
	title = {Bolzano and {Lesniewski}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1998},
}

@book{betti_contradictory_1997,
	address = {Łódź},
	title = {Contradictory {Objects}. {Twardowski}'s {Reversal} and the {Lukasiewicz}-{Lesniewski} {Controversy}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1997},
}

@book{betti_o_1997,
	address = {Warsaw},
	title = {O prawdzie odwiecznej. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Lesniewski} ({On} {Sempiternal} {Truth}. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Le}\&\#{xFFFD};\_niewski)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1997},
}

@book{betti_o_1997-1,
	address = {Warsaw},
	title = {O prawdzie odwiecznej. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Lesniewski} ({On} {Sempiternal} {Truth}. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Le}\&\#{xFFFD};\_niewski)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1997},
}

@book{betti_contradictory_1997-1,
	address = {Prague},
	title = {Contradictory {Objects}. {Twardowski}'s {Reversal} and the {Lukasiewicz}-{Lesniewski} {Controversy}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1997},
}

@book{betti_remarks_1996,
	address = {Zielona Góra},
	title = {Some remarks on {Bolzano}'s influence upon the {Lvov}-{Warsaw} {School}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1996},
}

@book{betti_veritate:_1995,
	address = {Lvov},
	title = {De {Veritate}: another {Chapter}. {The} {Bolzano}-{Lesniewski} {Connection}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	month = nov,
	year = {1995},
}

@misc{betti_how_nodate,
	title = {How to {Trace} the {Origins} and {Spread} of {Anything} (but of concepts, especially)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	collaborator = {van den Berg, Hein and Oortwijn, Yvette and Treijtel, Caspar},
}