Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Accessible versions of figures for 2021-053

A Wealth of Information: Augmenting the Survey of Consumer Finances to Characterize the Full U.S. Wealth Distribution

Accessible version of figures


Figure 1: Figure 1: U.S. Wealth Concentration in the Survey of Consumer Finances Varying Concept and Coverage
The figure graphs estimated wealth concentration among the wealthiest one percent of U.S. families from the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) between 1989 and 2019, incrementally adjusting the SCF as described in the text. The short-dashed black line displays estimates from the base SCF. The long-dashed black line adds wealth from defined benefit (DB) pension assets to the base SCF. The dotted black line adds Forbes 400 families and DB pension assets to the base SCF. The solid black line is estimated concentration from the "fully augmented" SCF, which adds wealth from adult financial independents in the same household, Forbes 400 families, and DB pension assets to the base SCF. The grey dotted and dashed lines replicate adjustments to the SCF proposed by Saez and Zucman (2020)--labeled SZ20--and Smith, Zidar, and Zwick (2020)--labeled SZZ20--respectively. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances.

Year SCF Family level SCF Family level SCF Family level SCF Family level SZ20 def SZZ def
SCF Bull ...add DB ...add FB ...addNPEU ...exCD_35DB ...exdurSZZ
1989 0.2986 0.2505 0.2580 0.2538 0.2743 0.2578
1992 0.3012 0.2454 0.2526 0.2480 0.2695 0.2539
1995 0.3454 0.2752 0.2851 0.2826 0.3108 0.2885
1998 0.3383 0.2795 0.2923 0.2909 0.3151 0.2964
2001 0.3259 0.2777 0.2877 0.2868 0.3078 0.2925
2004 0.3343 0.2824 0.2933 0.2919 0.3131 0.2963
2007 0.3379 0.2914 0.3036 0.3022 0.3219 0.3071
2010 0.3452 0.2923 0.3020 0.3008 0.3232 0.3070
2013 0.3631 0.2979 0.3096 0.3088 0.3332 0.3138
2016 0.3879 0.3277 0.3412 0.3408 0.3651 0.3451
2019 0.3739 0.3173 0.3324 0.3307 0.3530 0.3349

Return to text


Figure 2: U.S. Wealth Concentration in the Survey of Consumer Finances Varying Unit of Analysis
The figure graphs estimated wealth concentration among the top one percent of the distribution from the fully augmented Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), as defined in Figure 1, between 1989 and 2019, recasting the SCF data into alternate units of analysis. The dotted grey line depicts concentration among the top percent of families, the unit of observation in the SCF (but including financially independent members of the household), and the dashed grey line among the top percent of tax units. The black lines depict concentration among the top percent of individuals, whereby the solid black line--BGMV--splits wealth within couples leveraging the detailed asset ownership information in the SCF and the dashed black line follows current standard practice and splits wealth equally within couples. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances.

Year andNPEU(TU) Fully augmented Indiv addNPEU Fully augmented indiv (as 50/50 split)
1989 0.27759869 0.26156303 0.25381525 0.2552078
1990 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1991 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1992 0.26701674 0.25792757 0.24802081 0.24790433
1993 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1995 0.30296414 0.29068788 0.28263797 0.2834884
1996 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1997 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1998 0.3142938 0.30011339 0.29093062 0.28913552
1999 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2000 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2001 0.30965483 0.29165681 0.28684921 0.28026697
2002 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2003 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2004 0.3166399 0.2957471 0.29186516 0.28599432
2005 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2006 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2007 0.32510937 0.30704528 0.30217375 0.29515462
2008 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2009 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2010 0.32547197 0.30338646 0.30083864 0.29519487
2011 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2012 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2013 0.33616861 0.31684827 0.30876838 0.30621385
2014 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2016 0.3713719 0.35092199 0.34081666 0.34148022
2017 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2018 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2019 0.35814498 0.33676387 0.3306617 0.32576073

Return to text


Figure 3: Reconciling Estimates of U.S. Wealth Concentration
The figure graphs estimated wealth concentration among the wealthiest one percent of individuals from the fully augmented Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), as defined in Figure 1--labeled BGMV--and the capitalization models proposed by Saez and Zucman (2020)--labeled SZ20--and Smith, Zidar, and Zwick (2020)--labeled SZZ20--between 1989 and 2019. The top panel depicts the main estimates from each, the middle panel incrementally conceptually aligns our estimates with SZ20 (splitting wealth equally within couples and removing unfunded DB and consumer durable assets, respectively), and the bottom panel incrementally conceptually aligns our estimates with SZZ20 (splitting wealth equally within couples and removing consumer durable assets, respectively). Our estimates are plotted in black, SZ20's in green, and SZZ20's in blue. The shaded region around the solid black line in the top panel represents the 95 percent confidence interval for the BGMV estimates. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances; Saez and Zucman (2020a).

Year BGMV Equal-split adults Fully augmented Indiv Fully augmented Indiv_LB Fully augmented Indiv_UB SZ20 Equal-split adults as in SZ20 Fully augmented indiv (as 50/50 split) as in SZZ
1989 0.2853 0.2616 0.2343 0.2888 0.2341 0.2735 0.2552078 0.2593
1990 0.2853 #N/A! 0.2347 0.2860 0.2375 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1991 0.2797 #N/A! 0.2350 0.2833 0.2321 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1992 0.2908 0.2579 0.2353 0.2805 0.2402 0.2688 0.24790433 0.2533
1993 0.2899 #N/A! 0.2477 0.2900 0.2370 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 0.2889 #N/A! 0.2601 0.2994 0.2320 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1995 0.2885 0.2907 0.2725 0.3089 0.2370 0.3108 0.2834884 0.2895
1996 0.2955 #N/A! 0.2762 0.3115 0.2445 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1997 0.3046 #N/A! 0.2799 0.3140 0.2510 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1998 0.3147 0.3001 0.2836 0.3166 0.2691 0.3139 0.28913552 0.2967
1999 0.3177 #N/A! 0.2818 0.3128 0.2732 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2000 0.3235 #N/A! 0.2800 0.3089 0.2789 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2001 0.3190 0.2917 0.2783 0.3051 0.2820 0.3004 0.28026697 0.2850
2002 0.3139 #N/A! 0.2791 0.3069 0.2664 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2003 0.3138 #N/A! 0.2800 0.3088 0.2832 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2004 0.3184 0.2957 0.2808 0.3107 0.2840 0.3072 0.28599432 0.2909
2005 0.3263 #N/A! 0.2849 0.3142 0.2869 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2006 0.3306 #N/A! 0.2889 0.3176 0.2978 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2007 0.3357 0.3070 0.2930 0.3211 0.3033 0.3149 0.29515462 0.3001
2008 0.3384 #N/A! 0.2910 0.3207 0.2944 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2009 0.3298 #N/A! 0.2889 0.3203 0.2890 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2010 0.3421 0.3034 0.2869 0.3199 0.2994 0.3167 0.29519487 0.3010
2011 0.3527 #N/A! 0.2918 0.3240 0.2968 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2012 0.3656 #N/A! 0.2966 0.3281 0.3169 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2013 0.3609 0.3168 0.3015 0.3322 0.2973 0.3292 0.30621385 0.3120
2014 0.3655 #N/A! 0.3127 0.3437 0.2997 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 0.3663 #N/A! 0.3239 0.3552 0.3015 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2016 0.3627 0.3509 0.3351 0.3667 0.2963 0.3630 0.34148022 0.3460
2017 0.3556 #N/A! 0.3299 0.3625 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2018 0.3536 #N/A! 0.3248 0.3582 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2019 0.3531 0.3368 0.3196 0.3539 #N/A! 0.3464 0.32576073 0.3320

Return to text


Figure 4: Reconciling Estimates of U.S. Wealth Concentration
The figure graphs estimated wealth concentration among the wealthiest 0.1 percent of individuals from the fully augmented Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), as defined in Figure 1--labeled BGMV--and the capitalization models proposed by Saez and Zucman (2020)--labeled SZ20--and Smith, Zidar, and Zwick (2020)--labeled SZZ20-- between 1989 and 2019. The top panel depicts the main estimates from each, the middle panel incrementally conceptually aligns our estimates with SZ20 (splitting wealth equally within couples and removing unfunded DB and consumer durable assets, respectively), and the bottom panel incrementally conceptually aligns our estimates with SZZ20 (splitting wealth equally within couples and removing consumer durable assets, respectively). Our estimates are plotted in black, SZ20's in green, and SZZ20's in blue. The shaded region around the solid black line in the top panel represents the 95 percent confidence interval for the BGMV estimates. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances; Saez and Zucman (2020a).

Year BMGV Equal-split adults SZZ20Equal-split adults SCF(Ind)B+~P SCF(Ind)B+~P_LB SCF(Ind)B+~P_UB ex35pDB F+5050+~U exDur
1989 0.1207 0.0926 0.1020 0.0814 0.1227 0.1116 0.0970 0.0985
1990 0.1205 0.0948 #N/A! 0.0810 0.1222 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1991 0.1171 0.0913 #N/A! 0.0807 0.1216 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1992 0.1248 0.0981 0.1007 0.0803 0.1211 0.1058 0.0965 0.0984
1993 0.1242 0.0957 #N/A! 0.0878 0.1250 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 0.1242 0.0935 #N/A! 0.0954 0.1289 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1995 0.1264 0.0981 0.1179 0.1029 0.1329 0.1231 0.1113 0.1134
1996 0.1322 0.1038 #N/A! 0.1033 0.1341 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1997 0.1402 0.1086 #N/A! 0.1037 0.1354 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1998 0.1476 0.1212 0.1204 0.1041 0.1367 0.1277 0.1160 0.1196
1999 0.1516 0.1246 #N/A! 0.1015 0.1308 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2000 0.1593 0.1297 #N/A! 0.0988 0.1248 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2001 0.1550 0.1348 0.1076 0.0962 0.1189 0.1125 0.1033 0.1061
2002 0.1493 0.1201 #N/A! 0.0978 0.1218 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2003 0.1496 0.1352 #N/A! 0.0993 0.1248 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2004 0.1528 0.1343 0.1142 0.1008 0.1277 0.1175 0.1094 0.1113
2005 0.1571 0.1363 #N/A! 0.1045 0.1309 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2006 0.1611 0.1446 #N/A! 0.1081 0.1340 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2007 0.1688 0.1506 0.1245 0.1118 0.1372 0.1292 0.1193 0.1202
2008 0.1723 0.1429 #N/A! 0.1089 0.1371 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2009 0.1611 0.1391 #N/A! 0.1061 0.1370 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2010 0.1701 0.1493 0.1201 0.1032 0.1369 0.1246 0.1136 0.1164
2011 0.1791 0.1429 #N/A! 0.1072 0.1404 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2012 0.1882 0.1596 #N/A! 0.1111 0.1440 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2013 0.1832 0.1447 0.1313 0.1151 0.1475 0.1382 0.1271 0.1289
2014 0.1848 0.1473 #N/A! 0.1211 0.1532 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 0.1868 0.1481 #N/A! 0.1272 0.1590 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2016 0.1842 0.1434 0.1490 0.1332 0.1647 0.1512 0.1408 0.1427
2017 0.1835 #N/A! #N/A! 0.1301 0.1636 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2018 0.1816 #N/A! #N/A! 0.1270 0.1625 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2019 0.1802 #N/A! 0.1426 0.1240 0.1613 0.1465 0.1367 0.1383

Return to text


Figure A.1: Spearman rank correlations between observed and modeled wealth of SCF respondents
Note: this figure describes the Spearman rank correlation between wealth observed in the SCF and the wealth predicted under sampling models for SCF families selected in the wealthy oversample. The two models used in the oversample are a "correlation model" and a "capitalization model," and the figure shows that the "correlation model" is generally more highly correlated with SCF wealth rankings, especially for the wealthiest families Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances, and U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Division, INSOLE File.

Year Spearman Spearman Top 0.1 Spearman Top 0.1 Spearman
Capitalization Model Correlation Model Capitalization Model Correlation Model
2001 0.781 0.871 #N/A! #N/A!
2004 0.815 0.908 #N/A! #N/A!
2007 0.83 0.9049 0.614 0.734
2010 0.82 0.909 0.6168 0.7883
2013 0.829 0.878 0.549 0.719
2016 0.83 0.908 0.602 0.753
2019 0.82 0.911 0.625 0.752

Return to text


Figure A.2: Modeled wealth from income tax data: 2016 SCF respondents, nonrespondents
Note: this figure shows the distribution of expected wealth--described with a kernel density--of sampled SCF respondents and nonrespondents, grouped by sampling strata. Visually, the distribution of respondents (red lines) and nonrespondents wealth (blue lines) appears similar, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests fail to reject the null of equality of distribution, indicating that the set of SCF respondents can represent the nonrespondents in this dimension. This figure also shows that the set of SCF respondents comes from across the wealth distribution, as each strata has increasing expected wealth. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances, and U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Division, INSOLE File.

This figure shows the distribution of expected wealth—described with a kernel density—of sampled SCF respondents and nonrespondents. Panel A plots the distribution of expected wealth from the wealth correlation model. In panel A, there are six panels representing sampling strata in the SCF: the bottom two strata, and then strata 3, 4, 5, 6, and seven. Families with the lowest expected wealth are sampled in strata one and two (in the upper left panel). In this panel there is a red hump shaped line--representing SCF respondents--with a peak between 10 and 12 on the x-axis and a blue line--representing SCF nonrespondents--with a peak between 12 and 13 on the x-axis. In the upper middle panel—representing strata 3—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 14 on the x-axis. In the upper right panel—representing strata 4—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 15 on the x-axis. In the bottom left panel—representing strata 5—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 16 on the x-axis. In the bottom middle panel—representing strata 6—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 17 on the x-axis. In the bottom right panel—representing strata 7—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 20 on the x-axis. Panel B plots the distribution of expected wealth from the wealth capitalization model. In panel B, there are six panels representing sampling strata in the SCF: the bottom two strata, and then strata 3, 4, 5, 6, and seven. Families with the lowest expected wealth are sampled in strata one and two (in the upper left panel). In this panel there are two lines: a red line that has is maximal point near 11 on the x axis, rapidly declining until the x-axis hits 12, then finally decline gradually until x-axis is 15. The Blue line in this panel is nearly identical. In the upper middle panel—representing strata 3—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 15 on the x-axis. In the upper right panel—representing strata 4—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 16 on the x-axis. In the bottom left panel—representing strata 5—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 17 on the x-axis. In the bottom middle panel—representing strata 6—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 19 on the x-axis. In the bottom right panel—representing strata 7—the red and blue lines overlap and both have hump shaped distribution peaking at about 21 on the x-axis.

Return to text


Figure A.3: Aggregate income in SCF and income tax data
Note: panel A of this figure shows aggregate total and capital income in the SCF and administrative tax data, where total and capital income are defined in the text. Panel B shows aggregate total income and capital income of the top 0.1 percent as ranked by (a) total income and (b) by capital income. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances, and U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Division, Individual Public Use Tax File.

Panel A, Year LHS, SCFinc LHS, SOISCFinc RHS, SOIcapinc RHS, SCFcapinc
1988 3.62E+12 #N/A! #N/A! 8.37E+11
1989 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1990 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1991 4.06E+12 #N/A! #N/A! 8.98E+11
1992 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1993 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 4.59E+12 4.11E+12 7.25E+11 8.97E+11
1995 #N/A! 4.39E+12 8.08E+11 #N/A!
1996 #N/A! 4.74E+12 9.39E+11 #N/A!
1997 5.57E+12 5.18E+12 1.10E+12 1.22E+12
1998 #N/A! 5.62E+12 1.22E+12 #N/A!
1999 #N/A! 6.05E+12 1.35E+12 #N/A!
2000 7.08E+12 6.55E+12 1.49E+12 1.53E+12
2001 #N/A! 6.40E+12 1.19E+12 #N/A!
2002 #N/A! 6.30E+12 1.06E+12 #N/A!
2003 7.61E+12 6.48E+12 1.12E+12 1.35E+12
2004 #N/A! 7.07E+12 1.40E+12 #N/A!
2005 #N/A! 7.67E+12 1.73E+12 #N/A!
2006 9.28E+12 8.31E+12 1.95E+12 2.25E+12
2007 #N/A! 9.11E+12 2.12E+12 #N/A!
2008 #N/A! 8.72E+12 1.68E+12 #N/A!
2009 8.77E+12 8.20E+12 1.34E+12 1.50E+12
2010 #N/A! 8.66E+12 1.50E+12 #N/A!
2011 #N/A! 8.98E+12 1.57E+12 #N/A!
2012 1.02E+13 9.69E+12 2.00E+12 2.22E+12
2013 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2014 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 1.23E+13 #N/A! #N/A! 2.83E+12
2016 #N/A! 1.06E+13 2.04E+12 #N/A!


Panel B, year LHS, SOIinc LHS, SCFinc RHS, SOIcapinc RHS, SCFcapinc
1988 #N/A! 2.48E+11 #N/A! 2.36E+11
1989 1.80E+11 #N/A! 1.44E+11 #N/A!
1990 1.87E+11 #N/A! 1.45E+11 #N/A!
1991 #N/A! 2.74E+11 #N/A! 2.32E+11
1992 2.06E+11 #N/A! 1.46E+11 #N/A!
1993 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 2.17E+11 3.32E+11 1.69E+11 2.47E+11
1995 2.49E+11 #N/A! 1.92E+11 #N/A!
1996 3.10E+11 #N/A! 2.44E+11 #N/A!
1997 3.79E+11 3.48E+11 2.97E+11 2.65E+11
1998 4.62E+11 #N/A! 3.60E+11 #N/A!
1999 5.32E+11 #N/A! 4.04E+11 #N/A!
2000 6.41E+11 5.25E+11 4.85E+11 4.04E+11
2001 4.86E+11 #N/A! 3.56E+11 #N/A!
2002 4.14E+11 #N/A! 3.09E+11 #N/A!
2003 4.53E+11 4.99E+11 3.46E+11 3.54E+11
2004 6.00E+11 #N/A! 4.73E+11 #N/A!
2005 7.31E+11 #N/A! 5.92E+11 #N/A!
2006 7.90E+11 7.51E+11 6.54E+11 6.17E+11
2007 8.62E+11 #N/A! 7.04E+11 #N/A!
2008 7.64E+11 #N/A! 6.05E+11 #N/A!
2009 5.87E+11 5.26E+11 4.57E+11 4.05E+11
2010 7.11E+11 #N/A! 5.66E+11 #N/A!
2011 7.22E+11 #N/A! 5.68E+11 #N/A!
2012 9.92E+11 8.95E+11 8.15E+11 7.21E+11
2013 7.80E+11 #N/A! 6.24E+11 #N/A!
2014 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 #N/A! 1.09E+12 #N/A! 7.93E+11
2016 9.40E+11 #N/A! 7.62E+11 #N/A!

Return to text


Figure B.1: Share of wealth held across the wealth distribution by individuals
Note: this figure shows the share of wealth held by individuals in the BGMV estimates during the 1989-2019 period. The dashed lines indicate a 95% confidence interval surrounding the estimate of the share of wealth held by the wealthiest 1 percent. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances.

year bot50 nxt40 top1 top1_UB top1_LB nxt9
1989 0.029 0.329 0.262 0.2888 0.2343 0.381
1992 0.032 0.337 0.258 0.2805 0.2353 0.373
1995 0.031 0.325 0.291 0.3089 0.2725 0.352
1998 0.028 0.312 0.300 0.3166 0.2836 0.360
2001 0.027 0.310 0.292 0.3051 0.2783 0.372
2004 0.025 0.307 0.296 0.3107 0.2808 0.373
2007 0.022 0.285 0.307 0.3211 0.2930 0.386
2010 0.011 0.279 0.303 0.3199 0.2869 0.407
2013 0.010 0.277 0.317 0.3322 0.3015 0.397
2016 0.009 0.249 0.351 0.3667 0.3351 0.391
2019 0.013 0.255 0.337 0.3539 0.3196 0.396

Return to text


Figure B.2: Share of wealth held across the distribution by individuals in BGMV and SZ20
Note: this figure shows the share of wealth held by the top 10 percent and bottom 90 percent of individuals in the BGMV and SZ20 estimates. Trends and levels are broadly consistent with each other, helping to show that most of the discrepancies between the BGMV and SZ20 estimates occur at the top of the wealth distribution. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances; appendix figure 1 from Saez and Zucman (2020b).

Year BGMV indiv BGMV indiv SZ20 indiv SZ20 indiv
top10 bot90 top10 bot90
1989 0.643 0.357 0.65 0.35
1990 #N/A! #N/A! 0.65 0.35
1991 #N/A! #N/A! 0.65 0.35
1992 0.630 0.370 0.66 0.34
1993 #N/A! #N/A! 0.66 0.34
1994 #N/A! #N/A! 0.67 0.33
1995 0.643 0.357 0.67 0.33
1996 #N/A! #N/A! 0.67 0.33
1997 #N/A! #N/A! 0.68 0.32
1998 0.660 0.340 0.69 0.31
1999 #N/A! #N/A! 0.69 0.31
2000 #N/A! #N/A! 0.69 0.31
2001 0.663 0.337 0.68 0.32
2002 #N/A! #N/A! 0.68 0.32
2003 #N/A! #N/A! 0.68 0.32
2004 0.668 0.332 0.69 0.31
2005 #N/A! #N/A! 0.69 0.31
2006 #N/A! #N/A! 0.69 0.31
2007 0.693 0.307 0.70 0.30
2008 #N/A! #N/A! 0.71 0.29
2009 #N/A! #N/A! 0.71 0.29
2010 0.710 0.290 0.73 0.27
2011 #N/A! #N/A! 0.74 0.26
2012 #N/A! #N/A! 0.74 0.26
2013 0.714 0.286 0.74 0.26
2014 #N/A! #N/A! 0.74 0.26
2015 #N/A! #N/A! 0.74 0.26
2016 0.742 0.258 0.73 0.27
2017 #N/A! #N/A! 0.73 0.27
2018 #N/A! #N/A! 0.73 0.27
2019 0.733 0.267 0.73 0.27

Return to text


Figure C.1: Income distribution for wealthiest 1 percent, 1989-2019 SCF
Note: this figure describes the income distribution of the wealthiest 1 percent of SCF tax units in the 1989-2019 surveys. The yellow line, for example, shows that the share of the wealthiest 1 percent that are also in the top 1 percent of the income distribution ranges from about 38 percent (in the 1992 SCF) to about 55 percent (in the 2004 SCF). The share of the wealthiest 1 percent that are in the 90-99th percent of the income distribution (the "Next 9" percent) ranges between 34 percent (2004 SCF) and 50 percent (1998 SCF), and has been closer to 40 percent in recent years. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances.

Year Bottom 50 Next 40 Next 9 Top 1
1989 0.01 0.08 0.44 0.47
1992 0.04 0.10 0.48 0.38
1995 0.03 0.09 0.40 0.48
1998 0.02 0.07 0.50 0.41
2001 0.00 0.06 0.46 0.47
2004 0.03 0.08 0.34 0.55
2007 0.02 0.05 0.39 0.54
2010 0.05 0.08 0.42 0.46
2013 0.03 0.07 0.42 0.41
2016 0.04 0.03 0.40 0.51
2019 0.04 0.05 0.39 0.52

Return to text


Figure C.2: Wealthy portfolios
Note: this figure shows the portfolio of the wealthiest 0.1 percent of individuals estimated by SZ20 (top panel) and BGMV (bottom panel). Equity assets include both public and private C and S Corporations (directly-held), and business wealth includes all other forms of private business equity. Pension wealth includes all assets in DB and DC pension plans and in IRAs. Interest-bearing assets include checking and savings accounts and directly-held bonds. In the BGMV estimates, we assume that the Forbes families have the portfolio of the top 0.1% in the SZ20 portfolio. Source: Authors' calculations using Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Survey of Consumer Finances; figure 24 from Saez and Zucman (2020b).

Wealth components for the top 0.1% wealth share, % of total wealth [equal-split adults]

Year Wealth Interest-bearing assets Equity assets Housing Business wealth Pension wealth
1962 9.9% 1.8% 6.0% 1.4% 0.5% 0.3%
1963 9.8% 1.7% 6.1% 1.2% 0.5% 0.3%
1964 9.7% 1.6% 6.2% 1.1% 0.5% 0.3%
1965 9.9% 1.7% 6.2% 1.1% 0.6% 0.2%
1966 10.1% 1.7% 6.3% 1.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1967 10.1% 1.7% 6.3% 1.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1968 10.4% 1.7% 6.6% 1.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1969 9.9% 1.8% 6.0% 1.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1970 9.5% 1.9% 5.3% 1.4% 0.8% 0.1%
1971 9.4% 1.9% 5.1% 1.4% 0.9% 0.1%
1972 9.0% 1.8% 4.9% 1.4% 0.9% 0.1%
1973 8.4% 1.9% 3.9% 1.6% 1.0% 0.1%
1974 7.8% 1.9% 2.8% 1.9% 1.1% 0.1%
1975 7.5% 1.8% 2.3% 2.1% 1.1% 0.2%
1976 7.1% 1.7% 2.2% 2.0% 1.0% 0.1%
1977 7.0% 1.7% 2.0% 2.2% 1.1% 0.1%
1978 7.1% 1.7% 1.8% 2.3% 1.2% 0.1%
1979 7.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.4% 1.4% 0.1%
1980 7.8% 1.7% 2.0% 2.6% 1.4% 0.1%
1981 8.4% 1.8% 1.9% 3.1% 1.4% 0.1%
1982 9.1% 1.9% 2.3% 3.1% 1.5% 0.3%
1983 9.1% 2.0% 2.4% 3.1% 1.4% 0.3%
1984 9.2% 2.3% 2.3% 3.0% 1.3% 0.3%
1985 9.8% 2.8% 2.3% 3.2% 1.2% 0.4%
1986 9.7% 2.8% 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.3%
1987 10.8% 3.6% 2.6% 3.0% 1.1% 0.5%
1988 12.1% 4.0% 3.0% 3.1% 1.2% 0.8%
1989 12.1% 3.9% 3.4% 3.0% 1.1% 0.7%
1990 12.1% 4.0% 3.2% 2.9% 1.1% 0.8%
1991 11.7% 4.2% 3.2% 2.8% 1.1% 0.6%
1992 12.5% 4.2% 4.0% 2.7% 1.0% 0.7%
1993 12.4% 4.1% 4.2% 2.5% 1.0% 0.7%
1994 12.4% 4.2% 4.4% 2.3% 1.0% 0.6%
1995 12.6% 4.0% 4.7% 2.2% 1.1% 0.6%
1996 13.2% 3.9% 5.5% 2.1% 1.1% 0.7%
1997 14.0% 3.8% 6.2% 1.9% 1.1% 1.0%
1998 14.8% 3.8% 7.1% 1.9% 1.1% 0.8%
1999 15.2% 3.6% 7.7% 1.7% 1.1% 1.0%
2000 15.9% 3.7% 8.2% 1.8% 1.2% 1.0%
2001 15.5% 4.2% 7.0% 2.1% 1.4% 0.8%
2002 14.9% 4.8% 5.6% 2.4% 1.5% 0.6%
2003 15.0% 4.6% 5.6% 2.6% 1.6% 0.6%
2004 15.3% 4.7% 5.8% 2.7% 1.5% 0.6%
2005 15.7% 4.8% 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 0.7%
2006 16.1% 4.5% 6.2% 2.7% 2.1% 0.6%
2007 16.9% 4.8% 6.9% 2.1% 2.4% 0.7%
2008 17.2% 5.3% 6.2% 2.2% 2.8% 0.7%
2009 16.1% 6.1% 5.0% 1.9% 2.5% 0.7%
2010 17.0% 6.6% 6.0% 1.6% 1.9% 0.9%
2011 17.9% 6.8% 6.6% 2.0% 1.7% 0.9%
2012 18.8% 7.3% 6.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.1%
2013 18.3% 6.3% 7.3% 2.2% 1.8% 0.7%
2014 18.5% 5.5% 7.9% 2.4% 1.9% 0.7%
2015 18.7% 5.4% 8.2% 2.5% 2.0% 0.6%
2016 18.4% 5.2% 8.1% 2.5% 2.0% 0.6%
2017 18.3% 5.3% 8.1% 1.8% 2.2% 0.8%
2018 18.2% 5.3% 8.1% 1.8% 2.2% 0.8%
2019 18.0% 5.3% 8.0% 1.8% 2.2% 0.8%
2020 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!


repeat SCF -- distribute Forbes share as in SZ20 top 0.1 portfolio

Year Wealth Interest-bearing assets Equity assets Housing Business wealth Pension wealth
1989 10.3% 1.8% 3.6% 0.7% 3.8% 0.4%
1990 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1991 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1992 10.2% 1.6% 3.6% 0.7% 3.9% 0.4%
1993 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1994 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1995 11.9% 2.7% 4.7% 0.9% 3.3% 0.4%
1996 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1997 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
1998 12.2% 1.7% 6.2% 0.8% 3.0% 0.6%
1999 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2000 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2001 10.9% 1.9% 4.9% 0.8% 2.9% 0.4%
2002 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2003 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2004 11.6% 2.3% 4.6% 1.1% 3.3% 0.3%
2005 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2006 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2007 12.6% 2.0% 4.8% 1.0% 4.3% 0.6%
2008 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2009 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2010 12.2% 2.5% 4.2% 1.0% 4.2% 0.4%
2011 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2012 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2013 13.4% 2.9% 4.9% 1.1% 4.0% 0.5%
2014 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2015 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2016 15.2% 2.7% 5.8% 1.1% 5.2% 0.5%
2017 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2018 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!
2019 14.6% 2.2% 5.3% 1.0% 5.7% 0.4%
2020 #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A! #N/A!

Return to text