Earwitness identification: common ground, disputed territory and uncharted areas. Broeders, A P A Forensic Linguistics, 3(1):3-13. abstract bibtex Challenges to effective speaker identification by victims & witnesses are explored. A call by the International Assoc for Forensic Phonetics to develop guidelines has prompted increased research in the area of voice lineup procedure. Use of relevant visual lineup principles & cooperation between psychologists & phoneticians is recommended. A need to examine assumptions about auditory memory is emphasized. Several practices are critically evaluated: repeated trials, blank trials, familiar vs unfamiliar voices, the use of actors, verbatim text or transcripts, & the notions of propitious heterogeneity & ecphoric similiarty. Extensive study & attention to research design are called for; the dearth of estimator-variable investigations is noted. Caution in use of earwitness evidence is stressed.
@article{broeders_earwitness_1996,
Author = {Broeders, A P A},
Date = {1996},
Date-Modified = {2016-09-24 18:56:00 +0000},
Journal = {Forensic Linguistics},
Keywords = {earwitness, forensic, forensic phonetics},
Number = {1},
Pages = {3-13},
Title = {Earwitness identification: common ground, disputed territory and uncharted areas},
Volume = {3},
Abstract = {Challenges to effective speaker identification by victims \& witnesses are explored. A call by the International Assoc for Forensic Phonetics to develop guidelines has prompted increased research in the area of voice lineup procedure. Use of relevant visual lineup principles \& cooperation between psychologists \& phoneticians is recommended. A need to examine assumptions about auditory memory is emphasized. Several practices are critically evaluated: repeated trials, blank trials, familiar vs unfamiliar voices, the use of actors, verbatim text or transcripts, \& the notions of propitious heterogeneity \& ecphoric similiarty. Extensive study \& attention to research design are called for; the dearth of estimator-variable investigations is noted. Caution in use of earwitness evidence is stressed.}}