Naming the pain in requirements engineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Fernandez, D., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetrò, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayabi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Pfahl, D., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., Spinola, R., Tuzcu, A., de la Vara, J., & Wieringa, R. Empirical Software Engineering, Springer New York LLC, 2016. cited By
Naming the pain in requirements engineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Requirements Engineering (RE) has received much attention in research and practice due to its importance to software project success. Its interdisciplinary nature, the dependency to the customer, and its inherent uncertainty still render the discipline difficult to investigate. This results in a lack of empirical data. These are necessary, however, to demonstrate which practically relevant RE problems exist and to what extent they matter. Motivated by this situation, we initiated the Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering (NaPiRE) initiative which constitutes a globally distributed, bi-yearly replicated family of surveys on the status quo and problems in practical RE. In this article, we report on the qualitative analysis of data obtained from 228 companies working in 10 countries in various domains and we reveal which contemporary problems practitioners encounter. To this end, we analyse 21 problems derived from the literature with respect to their relevance and criticality in dependency to their context, and we complement this picture with a cause-effect analysis showing the causes and effects surrounding the most critical problems. Our results give us a better understanding of which problems exist and how they manifest themselves in practical environments. Thus, we provide a first step to ground contributions to RE on empirical observations which, until now, were dominated by conventional wisdom only. © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
@ARTICLE{Fernandez20161,
author={Fernandez, D.M. and Wagner, S. and Kalinowski, M. and Felderer, M. and Mafra, P. and Vetrò, A. and Conte, T. and Christiansson, M.-T. and Greer, D. and Lassenius, C. and Männistö, T. and Nayabi, M. and Oivo, M. and Penzenstadler, B. and Pfahl, D. and Prikladnicki, R. and Ruhe, G. and Schekelmann, A. and Sen, S. and Spinola, R. and Tuzcu, A. and de la Vara, J.L. and Wieringa, R.},
title={Naming the pain in requirements engineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice},
journal={Empirical Software Engineering},
year={2016},
pages={1-41},
doi={10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7},
note={cited By },
url={https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84992179970&doi=10.1007%2fs10664-016-9451-7&partnerID=40&md5=6369ad69ac467d95fab5df16b268c17f},
abstract={Requirements Engineering (RE) has received much attention in research and practice due to its importance to software project success. Its interdisciplinary nature, the dependency to the customer, and its inherent uncertainty still render the discipline difficult to investigate. This results in a lack of empirical data. These are necessary, however, to demonstrate which practically relevant RE problems exist and to what extent they matter. Motivated by this situation, we initiated the Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering (NaPiRE) initiative which constitutes a globally distributed, bi-yearly replicated family of surveys on the status quo and problems in practical RE. In this article, we report on the qualitative analysis of data obtained from 228 companies working in 10 countries in various domains and we reveal which contemporary problems practitioners encounter. To this end, we analyse 21 problems derived from the literature with respect to their relevance and criticality in dependency to their context, and we complement this picture with a cause-effect analysis showing the causes and effects surrounding the most critical problems. Our results give us a better understanding of which problems exist and how they manifest themselves in practical environments. Thus, we provide a first step to ground contributions to RE on empirical observations which, until now, were dominated by conventional wisdom only. © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York},
author_keywords={Requirements engineering;  Survey research},
keywords={Surveys, Cause-effect analysis;  Critical problems;  Empirical data;  Qualitative analysis;  Software project;  Status quo;  Survey research, Requirements engineering},
publisher={Springer New York LLC},
issn={13823256},
coden={ESENF},
document_type={Article in Press},
source={Scopus},
}
Downloads: 0