@article{knowles_clerkish_2009,
	title = {Clerkish {Control} of {Recent} {Supreme} {Court} {Opinions}: {A} {Case} {Study} of {Justice} {Kennedy}'s {Opinion} in {Gonzales} v. {Carhart}},
	volume = {10},
	number = {1},
	journal = {The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law},
	author = {Knowles, Helen J.},
	year = {2009},
	keywords = {DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, book revision 2025—early citations, book revision 2025—early race and due process citations, collocation, gonzales v. carhart, introduction, judicial argument, judicial authority, judicial composition, judicial style, nominalism, nominalism and flesh, right to be sexual, substantive due process, washington v. glucksberg},
	pages = {63--86},
}

{"_id":"y8Bt84ZDye7WD7Gsr","bibbaseid":"knowles-clerkishcontrolofrecentsupremecourtopinionsacasestudyofjusticekennedysopinioningonzalesvcarhart-2009","author_short":["Knowles, H. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Clerkish Control of Recent Supreme Court Opinions: A Case Study of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart","volume":"10","number":"1","journal":"The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Knowles"],"firstnames":["Helen","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2009","keywords":"DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, book revision 2025—early citations, book revision 2025—early race and due process citations, collocation, gonzales v. carhart, introduction, judicial argument, judicial authority, judicial composition, judicial style, nominalism, nominalism and flesh, right to be sexual, substantive due process, washington v. glucksberg","pages":"63–86","bibtex":"@article{knowles_clerkish_2009,\n\ttitle = {Clerkish {Control} of {Recent} {Supreme} {Court} {Opinions}: {A} {Case} {Study} of {Justice} {Kennedy}'s {Opinion} in {Gonzales} v. {Carhart}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law},\n\tauthor = {Knowles, Helen J.},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tkeywords = {DRI early research 2007-2021, DRI zotero, book revision 2025—early citations, book revision 2025—early race and due process citations, collocation, gonzales v. carhart, introduction, judicial argument, judicial authority, judicial composition, judicial style, nominalism, nominalism and flesh, right to be sexual, substantive due process, washington v. glucksberg},\n\tpages = {63--86},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Knowles, H. J."],"key":"knowles_clerkish_2009","id":"knowles_clerkish_2009","bibbaseid":"knowles-clerkishcontrolofrecentsupremecourtopinionsacasestudyofjusticekennedysopinioningonzalesvcarhart-2009","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["DRI early research 2007-2021","DRI zotero","book revision 2025—early citations","book revision 2025—early race and due process citations","collocation","gonzales v. carhart","introduction","judicial argument","judicial authority","judicial composition","judicial style","nominalism","nominalism and flesh","right to be sexual","substantive due process","washington v. glucksberg"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/odellcampbell","dataSources":["mQ5vNnJEGZpAggWxg"],"keywords":["dri early research 2007-2021","dri zotero","book revision 2025—early citations","book revision 2025—early race and due process citations","collocation","gonzales v. carhart","introduction","judicial argument","judicial authority","judicial composition","judicial style","nominalism","nominalism and flesh","right to be sexual","substantive due process","washington v. glucksberg"],"search_terms":["clerkish","control","recent","supreme","court","opinions","case","study","justice","kennedy","opinion","gonzales","carhart","knowles"],"title":"Clerkish Control of Recent Supreme Court Opinions: A Case Study of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart","year":2009}