Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science. Meissner, P.; Cottler, L. B.; Eder, M. “.; and Michener, J. L. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 4(3):216–218, June, 2020. Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Engagement science: The core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Stakeholder engagement is acknowledged as central to dissemination and implementation (D&I) of research that generates and answers new clinical and health service research questions. There is both benefit and risk in conducting stakeholder engagement. Done wrong, it can damage trust and adversely impact study results, outcomes, and reputations. Done correctly with sensitivity, inclusion, and respect, it can significantly facilitate improvements in research prioritization, communication, design, recruitment strategies, and ultimately provide results useful to improve population and individual health. There is a recognized science of stakeholder engagement, but a general lack of knowledge that matches its strategies and approaches to particular populations of interest based on history and characteristics. This article reviews stakeholder engagement, provides several examples of its application across the range of translational research, and recommends that Clinical Translational Science Awards, with their unique geographical, systems, and historical characteristics, actively participate in deepening our understanding of stakeholder engagement science and methods within implementation and dissemination research. These recommendations include (a) development of an inventory of successful stakeholder engagement strategies; (b) coordination and intentionally testing a variety of stakeholder engagement strategies; (c) tool kit development; and (d) identification of fundamental motivators and logic models for stakeholder engagement to help align stakeholders and researchers.
@article{meissner_engagement_2020,
	title = {Engagement science: {The} core of dissemination, implementation, and translational research science},
	volume = {4},
	issn = {2059-8661},
	shorttitle = {Engagement science},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-clinical-and-translational-science/article/engagement-science-the-core-of-dissemination-implementation-and-translational-research-science/1680BA8096F232A497A35E15E25EADBF},
	doi = {10.1017/cts.2020.8},
	abstract = {Stakeholder engagement is acknowledged as central to dissemination and implementation (D\&I) of research that generates and answers new clinical and health service research questions. There is both benefit and risk in conducting stakeholder engagement. Done wrong, it can damage trust and adversely impact study results, outcomes, and reputations. Done correctly with sensitivity, inclusion, and respect, it can significantly facilitate improvements in research prioritization, communication, design, recruitment strategies, and ultimately provide results useful to improve population and individual health. There is a recognized science of stakeholder engagement, but a general lack of knowledge that matches its strategies and approaches to particular populations of interest based on history and characteristics. This article reviews stakeholder engagement, provides several examples of its application across the range of translational research, and recommends that Clinical Translational Science Awards, with their unique geographical, systems, and historical characteristics, actively participate in deepening our understanding of stakeholder engagement science and methods within implementation and dissemination research. These recommendations include (a) development of an inventory of successful stakeholder engagement strategies; (b) coordination and intentionally testing a variety of stakeholder engagement strategies; (c) tool kit development; and (d) identification of fundamental motivators and logic models for stakeholder engagement to help align stakeholders and researchers.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2020-07-27},
	journal = {Journal of Clinical and Translational Science},
	author = {Meissner, Paul and Cottler, Linda B. and Eder, Milton “Mickey” and Michener, J. Lloyd},
	month = jun,
	year = {2020},
	note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},
	keywords = {Généralités, Libre accès},
	pages = {216--218},
}
Downloads: 0