\n

\n \n 2024\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Population and conservation status of the endangered Dracaena ombet tree in dry Afromontane forests.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gidey, T.; Birhane, E.; Solomon, N.; Atsbha, T.; Hn, J.; Mad, P.; and Borges, J., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n , 50(May 2023). 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Population and conservation status of the endangered Dracaena ombet tree in dry Afromontane forests},\n type = {article},\n year = {2024},\n keywords = {Desa’a forest,Ethiopia,Nubian dragon tree,Overexploitation,Persistence,agroecological zones},\n volume = {50},\n id = {f0da7611-6cb7-370e-a98c-ae57638c5634},\n created = {2024-01-19T09:23:46.769Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2024-01-19T09:23:46.769Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Dracaena ombet, a flagship tree species in arid ecosystems, holds a significant ecological, economic, and socio-cultural value. However, its persistence is currently under threat from both anthropogenic and natural factors. Consequently, the species has been listed as an endangered tree species on the IUCN Red List, requiring urgent conservation actions for its continued existence. To develop effective conservation actions, it is necessary to have information on the population dynamics of the species. A study was conducted in the lowland and midland agroecological zones (sites) within the Desa’a dry Afromontane forest, northern Ethiopia to analyze the population status of D. ombet and identify its site-specific threats. At each site, abundance, health status, diameter, height and threats of the species were collected using 60 sample plots (20 m × 20 m) distributed over six transects (500 m × 20 m) spaced one km apart. The study showed that the D. ombet population was characterized by low abundance and unstable structure. It was further characterized by a substantial number of unhealthy damaged and dead trees. The low abundance of the species with unstable age structure in the dry Afromontane forests can be attributed to various factors such as stem cutting and debarking, leaf defoliation, overgrazing, soil erosion, and competition from expansive shrubs. Alternative livelihood options for the local inhabitants should be introduced to minimize the overexploitation of D. ombet for subsistence use in the dry Afromontane forests. The impacts of overgrazing and soil erosion on D. ombet and its Desa’a habitats should also be addressed through the introduction of community-based exclosures and in-situ soil and water conservation practices, respectively.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Gidey, Tesfay and Birhane, Emiru and Solomon, Negasi and Atsbha, Tesfay and Hn, Joao and Mad, Petr and Borges, Jose G},\n doi = {10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02809},\n number = {May 2023}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Exploring agroforestry limiting factors and digitalization perspectives : insights from a european multi ‑ actor appraisal.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Tranchina, M.; Burgess, P.; Giuseppe, F.; Laura, C.; Marin, C.; Gosme, M.; Herder, M., D.; Kay, S.; Lawson, G.; Lojka, B.; Palma, J.; Pardon, P.; Reissig, L.; Reubens, B.; Prins, E.; and Vandendriessche, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, (0123456789). 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Exploring$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Exploring agroforestry limiting factors and digitalization perspectives : insights from a european multi ‑ actor appraisal},\n type = {article},\n year = {2024},\n keywords = {Actor-oriented research,Participatory research,Stakeholder perception,Survey,Sustainable agriculture,Tools},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01047-x},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {d42ececc-245a-33d1-92dc-6a36009159d0},\n created = {2024-08-03T18:07:35.382Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2024-08-03T18:07:35.382Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Tranchina, Margherita and Burgess, Paul and Giuseppe, Fabrizio and Laura, Cella and Marin, Cumplido and Gosme, Marie and Herder, Michael Den and Kay, Sonja and Lawson, Gerry and Lojka, Bohdan and Palma, João and Pardon, Paul and Reissig, Linda and Reubens, Bert and Prins, Evert and Vandendriessche, Jari},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-024-01047-x},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {0123456789}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2023\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Grange, I.; Smith, J.; and Smith, L., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Land Use Policy, 125(November 2021): 106502. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Meeting$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Meeting$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies},\n type = {article},\n year = {2023},\n keywords = {Afforestation,Agri-environment schemes,Agroforestry,Climate change,Woodland grants},\n pages = {106502},\n volume = {125},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106502},\n publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},\n id = {cbe989c2-96c2-3e6c-b1ca-75f4b0dcb37c},\n created = {2023-01-04T12:52:47.822Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-01-04T12:52:48.479Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The UK government has pledged to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Ambitious targets have been set to plant nearly a million hectares of new woodland in the UK by 2050 to meet these net-zero commitments. More than 70% of UK's land is used for agricultural production and to meet these targets the Climate Change Committee has estimated that by 2050 approximately 21% of agricultural land will be required for tree planting, agroforestry and the extension of farm hedges. Achieving this creates a potential conflict between land for food production and land for carbon sequestration. However, trees and woodlands, when integrated into farming systems, can be multifunctional and play a significant role in helping farmers adapt and become more resilient in the face of climate change. Over the last 100 years numerous government policies and incentive schemes have endeavoured to encourage more tree planting activities amongst farmers and landowners with varying degrees of success. This paper reviews the role of policy in determining the presence of trees in the UK's agricultural landscape over the past 100 years. We quantify the current extent of woodland and tree cover and aim to put the UK's net-zero tree planting targets in the context of historical agricultural land use patterns. We evaluate drivers behind the current extent of trees, woodland and agroforestry on UK farms and identify key elements of success in current and previous policies and incentive schemes to help inform future policy mechanisms for the UK to meet its tree planting targets. Farmers are increasingly under pressure to deliver a wide range of environmental goals as well as producing food. The effectiveness of financial incentives to influence tree planting is dependent on the pre-existing interest and values of the farmer or landowner and grants alone may not be sufficient to encourage farmers to plant trees. Scheme complexity, bureaucracy and insufficient payment rates are barriers to the success of woodland grants and agri-environment schemes. Simplicity is important to encourage uptake, however oversimplification of schemes can lead to unintended consequences. Advice and guidance are key elements in the successful adoption of any new land management methods. A key to future progress will be scheme flexibility to enable farmers to choose to plant trees where it best suits local conditions, to align policy tools with farmer values and to ensure that farmers and landowners have the knowledge and support to make these decisions.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Grange, Ian and Smith, Jo and Smith, Laurence G.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106502},\n journal = {Land Use Policy},\n number = {November 2021}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n The UK government has pledged to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Ambitious targets have been set to plant nearly a million hectares of new woodland in the UK by 2050 to meet these net-zero commitments. More than 70% of UK's land is used for agricultural production and to meet these targets the Climate Change Committee has estimated that by 2050 approximately 21% of agricultural land will be required for tree planting, agroforestry and the extension of farm hedges. Achieving this creates a potential conflict between land for food production and land for carbon sequestration. However, trees and woodlands, when integrated into farming systems, can be multifunctional and play a significant role in helping farmers adapt and become more resilient in the face of climate change. Over the last 100 years numerous government policies and incentive schemes have endeavoured to encourage more tree planting activities amongst farmers and landowners with varying degrees of success. This paper reviews the role of policy in determining the presence of trees in the UK's agricultural landscape over the past 100 years. We quantify the current extent of woodland and tree cover and aim to put the UK's net-zero tree planting targets in the context of historical agricultural land use patterns. We evaluate drivers behind the current extent of trees, woodland and agroforestry on UK farms and identify key elements of success in current and previous policies and incentive schemes to help inform future policy mechanisms for the UK to meet its tree planting targets. Farmers are increasingly under pressure to deliver a wide range of environmental goals as well as producing food. The effectiveness of financial incentives to influence tree planting is dependent on the pre-existing interest and values of the farmer or landowner and grants alone may not be sufficient to encourage farmers to plant trees. Scheme complexity, bureaucracy and insufficient payment rates are barriers to the success of woodland grants and agri-environment schemes. Simplicity is important to encourage uptake, however oversimplification of schemes can lead to unintended consequences. Advice and guidance are key elements in the successful adoption of any new land management methods. A key to future progress will be scheme flexibility to enable farmers to choose to plant trees where it best suits local conditions, to align policy tools with farmer values and to ensure that farmers and landowners have the knowledge and support to make these decisions.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Grange, I.; Smith, J.; and Smith, L., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Land Use Policy, 125(November 2021): 106502. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Meeting$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Meeting$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies},\n type = {article},\n year = {2023},\n keywords = {Afforestation,Agri-environment schemes,Agroforestry,Climate change,Woodland grants},\n pages = {106502},\n volume = {125},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106502},\n publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},\n id = {8ce12a6c-8de3-3a47-a470-4faa603c4358},\n created = {2023-01-09T14:50:07.115Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-01-09T14:51:16.926Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The UK government has pledged to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Ambitious targets have been set to plant nearly a million hectares of new woodland in the UK by 2050 to meet these net-zero commitments. More than 70% of UK's land is used for agricultural production and to meet these targets the Climate Change Committee has estimated that by 2050 approximately 21% of agricultural land will be required for tree planting, agroforestry and the extension of farm hedges. Achieving this creates a potential conflict between land for food production and land for carbon sequestration. However, trees and woodlands, when integrated into farming systems, can be multifunctional and play a significant role in helping farmers adapt and become more resilient in the face of climate change. Over the last 100 years numerous government policies and incentive schemes have endeavoured to encourage more tree planting activities amongst farmers and landowners with varying degrees of success. This paper reviews the role of policy in determining the presence of trees in the UK's agricultural landscape over the past 100 years. We quantify the current extent of woodland and tree cover and aim to put the UK's net-zero tree planting targets in the context of historical agricultural land use patterns. We evaluate drivers behind the current extent of trees, woodland and agroforestry on UK farms and identify key elements of success in current and previous policies and incentive schemes to help inform future policy mechanisms for the UK to meet its tree planting targets. Farmers are increasingly under pressure to deliver a wide range of environmental goals as well as producing food. The effectiveness of financial incentives to influence tree planting is dependent on the pre-existing interest and values of the farmer or landowner and grants alone may not be sufficient to encourage farmers to plant trees. Scheme complexity, bureaucracy and insufficient payment rates are barriers to the success of woodland grants and agri-environment schemes. Simplicity is important to encourage uptake, however oversimplification of schemes can lead to unintended consequences. Advice and guidance are key elements in the successful adoption of any new land management methods. A key to future progress will be scheme flexibility to enable farmers to choose to plant trees where it best suits local conditions, to align policy tools with farmer values and to ensure that farmers and landowners have the knowledge and support to make these decisions.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Grange, Ian and Smith, Jo and Smith, Laurence G.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106502},\n journal = {Land Use Policy},\n number = {November 2021}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n The UK government has pledged to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Ambitious targets have been set to plant nearly a million hectares of new woodland in the UK by 2050 to meet these net-zero commitments. More than 70% of UK's land is used for agricultural production and to meet these targets the Climate Change Committee has estimated that by 2050 approximately 21% of agricultural land will be required for tree planting, agroforestry and the extension of farm hedges. Achieving this creates a potential conflict between land for food production and land for carbon sequestration. However, trees and woodlands, when integrated into farming systems, can be multifunctional and play a significant role in helping farmers adapt and become more resilient in the face of climate change. Over the last 100 years numerous government policies and incentive schemes have endeavoured to encourage more tree planting activities amongst farmers and landowners with varying degrees of success. This paper reviews the role of policy in determining the presence of trees in the UK's agricultural landscape over the past 100 years. We quantify the current extent of woodland and tree cover and aim to put the UK's net-zero tree planting targets in the context of historical agricultural land use patterns. We evaluate drivers behind the current extent of trees, woodland and agroforestry on UK farms and identify key elements of success in current and previous policies and incentive schemes to help inform future policy mechanisms for the UK to meet its tree planting targets. Farmers are increasingly under pressure to deliver a wide range of environmental goals as well as producing food. The effectiveness of financial incentives to influence tree planting is dependent on the pre-existing interest and values of the farmer or landowner and grants alone may not be sufficient to encourage farmers to plant trees. Scheme complexity, bureaucracy and insufficient payment rates are barriers to the success of woodland grants and agri-environment schemes. Simplicity is important to encourage uptake, however oversimplification of schemes can lead to unintended consequences. Advice and guidance are key elements in the successful adoption of any new land management methods. A key to future progress will be scheme flexibility to enable farmers to choose to plant trees where it best suits local conditions, to align policy tools with farmer values and to ensure that farmers and landowners have the knowledge and support to make these decisions.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Yield-SAFE. Description and Calibration Guide.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Burgess, P.; Graves, A.; Upson, M.; Wiltshire, C.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; Metselaar, K.; Stappers, R.; Keesman, K.; Palma, J.; Pilbeam, D.; and van der Werf, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report Cranfield University. 46 pp, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Yield-SAFE.$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Yield-SAFE. Description and Calibration Guide.},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {46},\n websites = {https://cord.cranfield.ac.uk/articles/code/Yield-SAFE_v2_-_Biophysical_model_for_tree_and_crop_yields_in_agroforestry/24250549},\n city = {Cranfield, Bedfordshire},\n institution = {Cranfield University. 46 pp},\n id = {9f02e97a-59a2-33b0-bb54-a190149a0139},\n created = {2023-12-13T18:49:15.888Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-12-13T18:49:15.888Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Burgess, P.J. and Graves, A.R. and Upson, M. and Wiltshire, C. and Giannitsopoulos, M. and Metselaar, K. and Stappers, R. and Keesman, K. and Palma, J.H.N. and Pilbeam, D.J. and van der Werf, W.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Description of the Biophysical Yield-SAFE model as implemented in Microsoft Excel.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Burgess, P.; Graves, A.; Wiltshire, C.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; Upson, M.; Metselaar, K.; Stappers, R.; Keesman, K.; Palma, J.; and van der Werf, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report Cranfield University, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Description$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Description of the Biophysical Yield-SAFE model as implemented in Microsoft Excel},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {22},\n websites = {https://cord.cranfield.ac.uk/articles/code/Yield-SAFE_v2_-_Biophysical_model_for_tree_and_crop_yields_in_agroforestry/24250549?file=42570616},\n city = {Cranfield, Bedfordshire},\n institution = {Cranfield University},\n id = {68492e30-378d-3f2a-9284-ddd81e49afdd},\n created = {2023-12-13T18:49:15.918Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-12-13T18:49:15.918Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Burgess, P.J. and Graves, A.R. and Wiltshire, C. and Giannitsopoulos, M. and Upson, M. and Metselaar, K. and Stappers, R. and Keesman, K. and Palma, J.H.N. and van der Werf, W.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2022\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Staton, T.; Breeze, T., D.; Walters, R., J.; Smith, J.; and Girling, R., D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Economics, 191(September 2021): 107214. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Productivity,$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Productivity,$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system},\n type = {article},\n year = {2022},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Diversified farming system,E,cost-benefit analysis,diversified farming system,ecological intensification},\n pages = {107214},\n volume = {191},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107214},\n publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},\n id = {03fd8f73-fca3-318a-bba3-93e1b768ebf0},\n created = {2021-10-07T15:27:40.728Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-10-07T15:28:51.495Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Staton, Tom and Breeze, Tom D. and Walters, Richard J. and Smith, Jo and Girling, Robbie D.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107214},\n journal = {Ecological Economics},\n number = {September 2021}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Land use and soil characteristics affect soil organisms differently from above ‑ ground assemblages.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Burton, V., J.; Contu, S.; Palma, A., D.; Hill, S., L., L.; Albrecht, H.; Bone, J., S.; Carpenter, D.; Corstanje, R.; Smedt, P., D.; Farrell, M.; Ford, H., V.; Hudson, L., N.; Inward, K.; Jones, D., T.; Kosewska, A.; Lo, N., F.; and Hung, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n BMC Ecology and Evolution,1-9. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Land$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Land$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Land use and soil characteristics affect soil organisms differently from above ‑ ground assemblages},\n type = {article},\n year = {2022},\n keywords = {Land-use change,Land-use intensity,Mixed-effects models,Organism abundance,Soil biodiversity,Soil biota,land-use,land-use intensity,mixed-effects models,organism abundance,soil biodiversity,soil biota},\n pages = {1-9},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02089-4},\n publisher = {BioMed Central},\n id = {9462838f-dd68-3c1e-8bc4-4f75ae886581},\n created = {2022-11-22T14:15:22.992Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2022-11-22T14:15:45.671Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Burton, Victoria J and Contu, Sara and Palma, Adriana De and Hill, Samantha L L and Albrecht, Harald and Bone, James S and Carpenter, Daniel and Corstanje, Ronald and Smedt, Pallieter De and Farrell, Mark and Ford, Helen V and Hudson, Lawrence N and Inward, Kelly and Jones, David T and Kosewska, Agnieszka and Lo, Nancy F and Hung, Man},\n doi = {10.1186/s12862-022-02089-4},\n journal = {BMC Ecology and Evolution}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Assessment of soil carbon storage in three land use types of a semi-arid ecosystem in South Portugal.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Palma, J., H.; Paulo, J., A.; Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A.; and Mosquera-Losada, M., R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Catena. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Assessment of soil carbon storage in three land use types of a semi-arid ecosystem in South Portugal},\n type = {article},\n year = {2022},\n keywords = {Agricultural,Agroecology,Agroforestry,Climate change,Forest,Soil aggregates},\n id = {ef3bbe16-bc1c-3116-a876-bcc22a36b598},\n created = {2023-01-04T12:48:30.514Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-01-04T12:48:30.514Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The land use sector currently represents ∼25% of the global greenhouse gas emissions, thus this human activity is having a huge impact on climate change. Semi-arid climate areas, which are widely distributed, are particularly influenced by such climate change. In these areas, land use changes have transformed the entire landscape and increased the greenhouse gas emissions. However, in semi-arid climate areas, the information on the effect of climate change is scarce and usually centred on one single type of land use. For the land uses (forest, agricultural and agroforestry) traditionally found in the semi-arid area in South Portugal, this study aimed to evaluate (i) the soil chemical (pH) and physical properties (bulk density and percentage of different soil aggregate fractions: 250–2000; 53–250 and <53 μm) and (ii) the carbon (C) storage in whole soil and each soil aggregate fraction in land with over 100 years of the same use. The results show that after >100 years with the same land use, C storage in the whole soil was similar in the plots with extensive agriculture based on the agroecology principles to that in the agroforestry plots. However, the concentration and storage of C in the microaggregates (53–250 μm) and the silt + clay soil fraction (<53 μm) were generally higher for the forest and agroforestry land uses than for the agricultural land use due to the tree effect. This C associated with the smallest soil fractions is very stable and is retained in the soil in the long term. In this context, agroforestry systems improve the soil C storage in the long term at the same time that agricultural production is allowed compared to the traditional forest systems. Therefore, the establishment and maintenance of agroforestry systems in the semi-arid climate areas is a sustainable land use for climate change mitigation.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Palma, J. H.N. and Paulo, J. A. and Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. and Mosquera-Losada, M. R.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.catena.2022.106196},\n journal = {Catena}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2021\n \n \n (16)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Making hedgerows pay their way: the economics of harvesting field boundary hedges for bioenergy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Westaway, S.; Mullender, S.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; and Graves, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 9. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Making$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Making$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Making hedgerows pay their way: the economics of harvesting field boundary hedges for bioenergy},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n keywords = {Woodfuel,Coppicing,Agroforestry,Greenhouse gas emi,agroforestry á,biodiversity,elm farm,greenhouse gas emissions á,hamstead marshall,j,mullender,organic research centre,smith,westaway á s,woodfuel á coppicing á,á s},\n volume = {9},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00631-9},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {f41aabd1-d8a4-3792-a3b1-f8c78c44dc1a},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:34.760Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:00.106Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Westaway, Sally and Mullender, Samantha and Giannitsopoulos, Michail and Graves, Anil},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-021-00631-9},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Trace element composition of tree fodder and potential nutritional use for livestock N.R. Kendall.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kendall, N., R.; Smith, J.; Whistance, L., K.; Stergiadis, S.; Stoate, C.; Chesshire, H.; and Smith, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Livestock Science,1-34. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Trace$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Trace element composition of tree fodder and potential nutritional use for livestock N.R. Kendall},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {1-34},\n id = {73e7ea24-4d2f-3191-83fe-4cd3714ec557},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:35.167Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:00.564Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kendall, N R and Smith, J. and Whistance, L K and Stergiadis, S and Stoate, C. and Chesshire, H. and Smith, A.R.},\n doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104560},\n journal = {Livestock Science}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Evaluating a trait-based approach to compare natural enemy and pest communities in agroforestry vs. arable systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Staton, T.; Walters, R., J.; Smith, J.; Breeze, T., D.; and Girling, R., D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Applications, (February 2021). 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Evaluating$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Evaluating a trait-based approach to compare natural enemy and pest communities in agroforestry vs. arable systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n keywords = {conservation biological control,functional diversity,functional traits,invertebrates,natural pest control,silvoarable,weeds},\n id = {3a1e1378-7f5b-30cb-afad-edcec61a6e60},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:15:28.274Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:15:33.831Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Diversified farming systems, for example those that incorporate agroforestry elements, have been proposed as a solution that could maintain and improve multiple ecosystem services. However, habitat diversification in and around arable fields has complex and inconsistent effects on invertebrate crop pests and their natural enemies. This hinders the development of policy recommendations to promote the adoption of such management strategies for the provision of natural pest control services. Here, for the first time, we conducted a trait-based approach to investigate the effect of farming system on plant, invertebrate herbivore, and invertebrate natural enemy communities. We then evaluated this approach by comparing the results to those generated using a traditional taxonomic approach. At each of three working farms, we sampled within an agroforestry field (a diverse farming system comprising alleys of arable crops separated by tree rows), and within a paired non-diversified area of the farm (arable control field). Each of 96 sample points was sampled between 8 and 10 times, yielding 393,318 invertebrate specimens from 344 taxonomic groups. Diet specialization or granivory, lack of a pupal stage, and wing traits in invertebrates, along with late flowering, short flowering duration, creeping habit, and perenniality in plants, were traits more strongly associated with agroforestry crop alleys than the arable control fields. We hypothesize that this is a result of reduced habitat disturbance and increased habitat complexity in the agroforestry system. Taxonomic richness and diversity were higher in the agroforestry crop alleys compared to the arable control fields, but these effects were stronger at lower trophic levels. However, functional trait diversity of natural enemies was significantly higher in the agroforestry crop alleys than the arable control fields, suggesting an improved level of biocontrol, which was not detected by traditional diversity metrics. Of eight key pest taxa, three were significantly suppressed in the agroforestry system, while two were more abundant, compared to the arable control fields. Trait-based approaches can provide a better mechanistic understanding of farming system effects on pests and their natural enemies, therefore we recommend their application and testing in future studies of diversified farming systems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Staton, Tom and Walters, Richard J. and Smith, Jo and Breeze, Tom D. and Girling, Robbie D.},\n doi = {10.1002/eap.2294},\n journal = {Ecological Applications},\n number = {February 2021}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Diversified farming systems, for example those that incorporate agroforestry elements, have been proposed as a solution that could maintain and improve multiple ecosystem services. However, habitat diversification in and around arable fields has complex and inconsistent effects on invertebrate crop pests and their natural enemies. This hinders the development of policy recommendations to promote the adoption of such management strategies for the provision of natural pest control services. Here, for the first time, we conducted a trait-based approach to investigate the effect of farming system on plant, invertebrate herbivore, and invertebrate natural enemy communities. We then evaluated this approach by comparing the results to those generated using a traditional taxonomic approach. At each of three working farms, we sampled within an agroforestry field (a diverse farming system comprising alleys of arable crops separated by tree rows), and within a paired non-diversified area of the farm (arable control field). Each of 96 sample points was sampled between 8 and 10 times, yielding 393,318 invertebrate specimens from 344 taxonomic groups. Diet specialization or granivory, lack of a pupal stage, and wing traits in invertebrates, along with late flowering, short flowering duration, creeping habit, and perenniality in plants, were traits more strongly associated with agroforestry crop alleys than the arable control fields. We hypothesize that this is a result of reduced habitat disturbance and increased habitat complexity in the agroforestry system. Taxonomic richness and diversity were higher in the agroforestry crop alleys compared to the arable control fields, but these effects were stronger at lower trophic levels. However, functional trait diversity of natural enemies was significantly higher in the agroforestry crop alleys than the arable control fields, suggesting an improved level of biocontrol, which was not detected by traditional diversity metrics. Of eight key pest taxa, three were significantly suppressed in the agroforestry system, while two were more abundant, compared to the arable control fields. Trait-based approaches can provide a better mechanistic understanding of farming system effects on pests and their natural enemies, therefore we recommend their application and testing in future studies of diversified farming systems.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rapid tannin profiling of tree fodders using untargeted mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ortuño, J.; Stergiadis, S.; Koidis, A.; Smith, J.; Humphrey, C.; Whistance, L.; and Theodoridou, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Plant Methods, 17(1): 1-12. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Rapid$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Rapid$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Rapid tannin profiling of tree fodders using untargeted mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n keywords = {Chemometrics,Condensed tannins,Maple,Oak,Ruminant nutrition,Silvopastoralism,Tree fodders,Willow},\n pages = {1-12},\n volume = {17},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00715-8},\n publisher = {BioMed Central},\n id = {c4f018de-63c9-319d-8d1a-01aba0bdbb4d},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:15:28.276Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:15:36.245Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Background: The presence of condensed tannins (CT) in tree fodders entails a series of productive, health and ecological benefits for ruminant nutrition. Current wet analytical methods employed for full CT characterisation are time and resource-consuming, thus limiting its applicability for silvopastoral systems. The development of quick, safe and robust analytical techniques to monitor CT’s full profile is crucial to suitably understand CT variability and biological activity, which would help to develop efficient evidence-based decision-making to maximise CT-derived benefits. The present study investigates the suitability of Fourier-transformed mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR: 4000–550 cm−1) combined with multivariate analysis to determine CT concentration and structure (mean degree of polymerization—mDP, procyanidins:prodelphidins ratio—PC:PD and cis:trans ratio) in oak, field maple and goat willow foliage, using HCl:Butanol:Acetone:Iron (HBAI) and thiolysis-HPLC as reference methods. Results: The MIR spectra obtained were explored firstly using Principal Component Analysis, whereas multivariate calibration models were developed based on partial least-squares regression. MIR showed an excellent prediction capacity for the determination of PC:PD [coefficient of determination for prediction (R2P) = 0.96; ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD) = 5.26, range error ratio (RER) = 14.1] and cis:trans ratio (R2P = 0.95; RPD = 4.24; RER = 13.3); modest for CT quantification (HBAI: R2P = 0.92; RPD = 3.71; RER = 13.1; Thiolysis: R2P = 0.88; RPD = 2.80; RER = 11.5); and weak for mDP (R2P = 0.66; RPD = 1.86; RER = 7.16). Conclusions: MIR combined with chemometrics allowed to characterize the full CT profile of tree foliage rapidly, which would help to assess better plant ecology variability and to improve the nutritional management of ruminant livestock.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Ortuño, Jordi and Stergiadis, Sokratis and Koidis, Anastasios and Smith, Jo and Humphrey, Chris and Whistance, Lindsay and Theodoridou, Katerina},\n doi = {10.1186/s13007-021-00715-8},\n journal = {Plant Methods},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Conserving threatened beneficial insects: bees, wasps and hoverflies in UK silvoarable systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Staton, T.; Walters, R., J.; Smith, J.; Breeze, T., D.; Davies, S., K.; and Staton, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Conserving$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Conserving threatened beneficial insects: bees, wasps and hoverflies in UK silvoarable systems},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n issue = {May},\n id = {3f81eee3-7317-30cf-bba6-63dfcd709b0c},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:15:28.448Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:15:30.710Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Staton, Tom and Walters, Richard J and Smith, Jo and Breeze, Tom D and Davies, Sian K and Staton, Tom},\n booktitle = {EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Management to Promote Flowering Understoreys Benefits Natural Enemy Diversity, Aphid Suppression and Income in an Agroforestry System.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Staton, T.; Walters, R.; Smith, J.; Breeze, T.; and Girling, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agronomy, 11(4): 651. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Management$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Management to Promote Flowering Understoreys Benefits Natural Enemy Diversity, Aphid Suppression and Income in an Agroforestry System},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {651},\n volume = {11},\n id = {886d0639-7e0f-334e-b4a9-0f75648bed02},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:15:28.455Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:15:32.675Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry systems, where productive trees are integrated into agricultural land, can deliver benefits to biodiversity, natural pest control, and pollination, but the effects are highly variable. Recent advances in our understanding of flower strips in agricultural systems suggest that the management of the tree row understorey could be an important contributor to this variation. Here, we compare two cutting regimes for an understorey, originally seeded with the same flower mix, in the tree rows of an apple-arable agroforestry system: (i) uncut vegetation to promote a flowering understorey, and (ii) regularly mown vegetation. We recorded the effects of management on invertebrate pests, natural enemies, and pollinators, in both the apple and arable components. Apple trees above flowering understoreys supported significantly: (i) more natural enemies early in the season, (ii) fewer aphid colonies, (iii) fewer aphid-damaged fruits, and (iv) higher pollinator visitation, compared with those above mown understoreys. In the arable crop alleys, both the taxonomic richness and Shannon diversity of ground-based natural enemies were significantly higher adjacent to flowering understoreys, compared with those adjacent to mown understoreys, early in the season. Financial modelling based on aphid damage to apples, mowing costs, and income from Countryside Stewardship grants, indicated that flowering understoreys increased farm income by GBP 231.02 per ha of agroforestry compared with mown understoreys. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that management to promote flowering understoreys in agroforestry systems can be a win-win option to improve invertebrate diversity, associated ecosystem services, and farm income.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Staton, Tom and Walters, Richard and Smith, Jo and Breeze, Tom and Girling, Robbie},\n doi = {10.3390/agronomy11040651},\n journal = {Agronomy},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Using 3PG to assess climate change impacts on management plan optimization of Eucalyptus plantations. A case study in Southern Brazil.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n HN Palma, J.; Hakamada, R.; Moreira, G., G.; Nobre, S.; and Rodriguez, L., C., E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Scientific Reports. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Using 3PG to assess climate change impacts on management plan optimization of Eucalyptus plantations. A case study in Southern Brazil},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n id = {5df0bd1b-e091-3c19-a832-6bb4afe0970a},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:33:59.479Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:33:59.479Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Eucalyptus plantations around the world have been largely used by the paper industry. Optimizing the management of resources is a common practice in this highly competitive industry and new forest growth models may help to understand the impact of climate change on the decisions of the optimization processes. Current optimized management plans use empirical equations to predict future forest stands growth, and it is currently impractical to replace these empirical equations with physiological models due to data input requirements. In this paper, we present a different approach, by first carrying out a preliminary assessment with the process-based physiological model 3PG to evaluate the growth of Eucalyptus stands under climate change predictions. The information supplied by 3PG was then injected as a modifier in the projected yield that feeds the management plan optimizer allowing the interpretation of climate change impacts on the management plan. Modelling results show that although a general increase of rain with climate change is predicted, the distribution throughout the year will not favor the tree growth. On the contrary, rain will increase when it is less needed (summer) and decrease when it is most needed (winter), decreasing forest stand productivity between 3 and 5%, depending on the region and soil. Evaluation of the current optimized plan that kept constant the relation between wood price/cellulose ton shows a variation in different strategic management options and an overall increase of costs in owned areas between 2 and 4%, and a decrease of cumulated net present value, initially at 15% with later stabilization at 6–8%. This is a basic comparison to observe climate change effects; nevertheless, it provides insights into how the entire decision-making process may change due to a reduction in biomass production under future climate scenarios. This work demonstrates the use of physiological models to extract information that could be merged with existing and already implemented empirical models. The methodology may also be considered a preliminary alternative to the complete replacement of empirical models by physiological models. Our approach allows some insight into forest responses to different future climate conditions, something which empirical models are not designed for.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {HN Palma, João and Hakamada, Rodrigo and Moreira, Gabriela Gonçalves and Nobre, Silvana and Rodriguez, Luiz Carlos Estraviz},\n doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-81907-z},\n journal = {Scientific Reports}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Eucalyptus plantations around the world have been largely used by the paper industry. Optimizing the management of resources is a common practice in this highly competitive industry and new forest growth models may help to understand the impact of climate change on the decisions of the optimization processes. Current optimized management plans use empirical equations to predict future forest stands growth, and it is currently impractical to replace these empirical equations with physiological models due to data input requirements. In this paper, we present a different approach, by first carrying out a preliminary assessment with the process-based physiological model 3PG to evaluate the growth of Eucalyptus stands under climate change predictions. The information supplied by 3PG was then injected as a modifier in the projected yield that feeds the management plan optimizer allowing the interpretation of climate change impacts on the management plan. Modelling results show that although a general increase of rain with climate change is predicted, the distribution throughout the year will not favor the tree growth. On the contrary, rain will increase when it is less needed (summer) and decrease when it is most needed (winter), decreasing forest stand productivity between 3 and 5%, depending on the region and soil. Evaluation of the current optimized plan that kept constant the relation between wood price/cellulose ton shows a variation in different strategic management options and an overall increase of costs in owned areas between 2 and 4%, and a decrease of cumulated net present value, initially at 15% with later stabilization at 6–8%. This is a basic comparison to observe climate change effects; nevertheless, it provides insights into how the entire decision-making process may change due to a reduction in biomass production under future climate scenarios. This work demonstrates the use of physiological models to extract information that could be merged with existing and already implemented empirical models. The methodology may also be considered a preliminary alternative to the complete replacement of empirical models by physiological models. Our approach allows some insight into forest responses to different future climate conditions, something which empirical models are not designed for.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 5th European Agroforestry Conference: Agroforestry for the Transition Towards Sustainability and Bioeconomy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n EURAF\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Spano, D.; Rosati, A.; Seddaiu, G.; Franca, A.; Bacciu, V.; Pulina, G.; Paris, P.; Mele, M.; Ragaglini, G.; Trabucco, A.; Mantino, A.; Reubens, B.; Pardon, P.; Smith, J.; Lawson, G.; Burgess, P.; Dupraz, C.; Liagre, F.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Rois-Díaz, M.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Pantera, A.; Paulo, J.; Soares David, T.; Caldeira, C.; Abdo, M.; Pecheco Faias, S.; Lamersdorf, N.; Herzog, F.; Kay, S.; Borek, R.; Lojka, B.; Vityi, A.; Szalai, Z.; Yukhnovskyi, V.; Kachova, V.; and den Herder, M., editor(s), Agroforestry for the Transition Towards Sustainability and Bioeconomy, pages 546, 2021. EURAF\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"5th$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"5th$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {5th European Agroforestry Conference: Agroforestry for the Transition Towards Sustainability and Bioeconomy},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {546},\n websites = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qqysI_oF-EeDjJZAaS2ICWKNTlUubicj/view},\n publisher = {EURAF},\n id = {5134643c-6a5a-35bc-802d-cc7f8cdefa82},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:46:41.630Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:47:42.653Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {EURAF, undefined},\n editor = {Spano, D. and Rosati, A and Seddaiu, G. and Franca, A. and Bacciu, V. and Pulina, G. and Paris, P. and Mele, M. and Ragaglini, G. and Trabucco, A. and Mantino, A. and Reubens, B. and Pardon, P. and Smith, J. and Lawson, G. and Burgess, P. and Dupraz, C. and Liagre, F. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Rois-Díaz, M. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Pantera, A. and Paulo, J.A. and Soares David, T. and Caldeira, C. and Abdo, M. and Pecheco Faias, S. and Lamersdorf, N. and Herzog, F. and Kay, S. and Borek, R. and Lojka, B. and Vityi, A. and Szalai, Z. and Yukhnovskyi, V. and Kachova, V. and den Herder, M.},\n booktitle = {Agroforestry for the Transition Towards Sustainability and Bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Silvopasture as a best practice for achieving good animal welfare in a changing and changeable climate: a review.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Whistance, L., K.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 70-71, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Silvopasture as a best practice for achieving good animal welfare in a changing and changeable climate: a review},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {70-71},\n id = {09e1f122-905a-3f2e-9a83-82d4e4509bd8},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.453Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.453Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Whistance, L K and Smith, J.},\n booktitle = {EURAF2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Higher biodiversity and pollination service in temperate agroforestry than in monoculture.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Varah, A.; Jones, H.; Smith, J.; and Potts, S., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 215-216, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Higher$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Higher biodiversity and pollination service in temperate agroforestry than in monoculture},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {215-216},\n id = {2d8dea1c-538e-3ca5-9a32-f5e5652906d3},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.456Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:34.560Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Varah, A. and Jones, H. and Smith, J. and Potts, S. G.},\n booktitle = {EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n On-farm production of woodchip for use as a soil improver: practical implementation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 414-415, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"On-farm$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {On-farm production of woodchip for use as a soil improver: practical implementation},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {414-415},\n id = {2baef984-3fdc-359e-9139-4f137048215c},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.624Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:41.729Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, S. and Smith, J.},\n booktitle = {EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The potential of economically successful innovative food and non-food systems in limiting soil erosion by wind across EU regions.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wawer, R.; Borek, R.; Koza, P.; Gliga, A.; Ghaley, B.; Xu, Y.; Smith, J.; Smith, L.; Sandor, M.; Pisanelli, A.; Augusti, A.; Lauteri, M.; Lehmann, L.; and Jurga, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 188-189, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {The potential of economically successful innovative food and non-food systems in limiting soil erosion by wind across EU regions},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {188-189},\n id = {2b5846cf-a14f-35ab-926d-4c53b22f35eb},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.640Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:39.760Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Wawer, R. and Borek, R. and Koza, P. and Gliga, A. and Ghaley, BB and Xu, Y. and Smith, J. and Smith, L. and Sandor, M. and Pisanelli, A. and Augusti, A. and Lauteri, M. and Lehmann, L.M. and Jurga, B.},\n booktitle = {EURAF2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rapid tannin profiling of tree fodders using untargeted mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ortuño, J.; Stergiadis, S.; Koidis, A.; Smith, J.; Humphrey, C.; Whistance, L.; and Theodoridou, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 422-423, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Rapid$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Rapid tannin profiling of tree fodders using untargeted mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {422-423},\n id = {9569350c-b65a-31fb-b112-5461e48495af},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.773Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:36.546Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Ortuño, Jordi and Stergiadis, S and Koidis, Anastasios and Smith, J. and Humphrey, C. and Whistance, L. and Theodoridou, Katerina},\n booktitle = {EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry innovation networks.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mosquera-Losada, M., R.; Pantera, A.; Rodríguez-Rigueiro, F.; Silva-Losada, P.; Villada, A.; Pisanelli, A.; Consalvo, C.; Van Colen, W.; den Herder, M.; Rois, M.; Muñiz Alonso, A.; Garrido, L.; Paulo, J.; Vityi, A.; Szigeti, N.; Fereiro-Dominguez, N.; Borek, R.; Galczynska, M.; Belaguer, F.; Reubens, B.; Pardon, P.; Westaway, S.; Smith, J.; and Santiago-Freijanes, J., J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy, pages 416-417, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Agroforestry innovation networks},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {416-417},\n id = {f22ae320-f3b2-3431-9699-d25d9f1f5b44},\n created = {2021-05-25T12:32:30.858Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T12:32:37.971Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Mosquera-Losada, M. R. and Pantera, A and Rodríguez-Rigueiro, F.J. and Silva-Losada, P. and Villada, A. and Pisanelli, A. and Consalvo, C. and Van Colen, W and den Herder, M. and Rois, M and Muñiz Alonso, A. and Garrido, L. and Paulo, J.A. and Vityi, A. and Szigeti, N. and Fereiro-Dominguez, N. and Borek, R. and Galczynska, M. and Belaguer, F. and Reubens, B. and Pardon, P. and Westaway, S and Smith, J. and Santiago-Freijanes, J. J.},\n booktitle = {EURAF 2020 Agroforestry for the transition towards sustainability and bioeconomy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Trace element composition of tree fodder and potential nutritional use for livestock.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kendall, N., R.; Smith, J.; Whistance, L., K.; Stergiadis, S.; Stoate, C.; Chesshire, H.; and Smith, A., R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Livestock Science, 250(February): 104560. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Trace$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Trace$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Trace element composition of tree fodder and potential nutritional use for livestock},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Browse,Grazing,Minerals,Silvopasture,Supplementary feeding},\n pages = {104560},\n volume = {250},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104560},\n publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},\n id = {dbd873a7-5f1d-356f-a3dd-0564702daec9},\n created = {2022-11-22T14:15:23.009Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2022-11-22T14:15:50.403Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Silvopastoral agroforestry, the integration of trees into livestock production systems, is an ancient practice with benefits to animal welfare and nutrition. Intensification of farming practices have reduced the presence of trees and hedgerows in the agricultural landscape. Environmental benefits coupled with improvements to ecological resilience and the long-term sustainability of farm productivity have led to a resurgence in interest in silvopastoral farming systems. The objective of this study was to investigate the nutritional composition and potential use of tree leaves as a supplementary fodder for ruminant livestock, with particular reference to sheep. Leaves (including petioles) were collected during spring (June) and autumn (September) from goat willow (Salix caprea), oak (Quercus spp) and alder (Alnus spp) from three sites in the UK. On the third site samples of ash (Fraxinus excelsior), beech (Fagus sylvatica), sweet chestnut (Castenea sativa) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) were also collected. Tree leaves were analysed to determine mineral content, dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), modified acid detergent fibre (MADF) and metabolisable energy (ME) which were then compared to the nutritional requirements of grazing sheep (Ovis aries). Leaves from all tree species used in this study were able to exceed the dietary ME and CP concentration requirements (NRC) for growing lambs (40 kg lamb @ 150 g/d). Alder contained the most ME and CP of the studied species. There was no significant effect of season although CP was higher in spring than autumn for all tree species. Zinc and cobalt concentrations were found to be dependent on tree species with negligible site and season effects. All (NRC) sheep requirements of both elements were exceeded by willow, met by alder and not met by oak, willow exceeded these requirements for zinc and cobalt by approximately 3-6 and 10-15 fold respectively. Leaf selenium concentrations were site specific with site 1 almost able to meet maximal requirement, whilst all other sites (all tree species) were around the minimal requirement. To conclude, ME and CP concentrations of the tree leaves were generally within a requirement range to support adequate growth of lambs if leaves fed alone (not likely in practice). Selenium concentrations were site dependant, iodine was mainly season dependent with tree species effects for zinc and cobalt. The zinc and especially cobalt concentrations of willow leaves were sufficient to suggest that willow could be used as a bio-supplement when fed within a conventional grazing system, especially useful for growing lambs.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kendall, N. R. and Smith, J. and Whistance, L. K. and Stergiadis, S. and Stoate, C. and Chesshire, H. and Smith, A. R.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104560},\n journal = {Livestock Science},\n number = {February}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Silvopastoral agroforestry, the integration of trees into livestock production systems, is an ancient practice with benefits to animal welfare and nutrition. Intensification of farming practices have reduced the presence of trees and hedgerows in the agricultural landscape. Environmental benefits coupled with improvements to ecological resilience and the long-term sustainability of farm productivity have led to a resurgence in interest in silvopastoral farming systems. The objective of this study was to investigate the nutritional composition and potential use of tree leaves as a supplementary fodder for ruminant livestock, with particular reference to sheep. Leaves (including petioles) were collected during spring (June) and autumn (September) from goat willow (Salix caprea), oak (Quercus spp) and alder (Alnus spp) from three sites in the UK. On the third site samples of ash (Fraxinus excelsior), beech (Fagus sylvatica), sweet chestnut (Castenea sativa) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) were also collected. Tree leaves were analysed to determine mineral content, dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), modified acid detergent fibre (MADF) and metabolisable energy (ME) which were then compared to the nutritional requirements of grazing sheep (Ovis aries). Leaves from all tree species used in this study were able to exceed the dietary ME and CP concentration requirements (NRC) for growing lambs (40 kg lamb @ 150 g/d). Alder contained the most ME and CP of the studied species. There was no significant effect of season although CP was higher in spring than autumn for all tree species. Zinc and cobalt concentrations were found to be dependent on tree species with negligible site and season effects. All (NRC) sheep requirements of both elements were exceeded by willow, met by alder and not met by oak, willow exceeded these requirements for zinc and cobalt by approximately 3-6 and 10-15 fold respectively. Leaf selenium concentrations were site specific with site 1 almost able to meet maximal requirement, whilst all other sites (all tree species) were around the minimal requirement. To conclude, ME and CP concentrations of the tree leaves were generally within a requirement range to support adequate growth of lambs if leaves fed alone (not likely in practice). Selenium concentrations were site dependant, iodine was mainly season dependent with tree species effects for zinc and cobalt. The zinc and especially cobalt concentrations of willow leaves were sufficient to suggest that willow could be used as a bio-supplement when fed within a conventional grazing system, especially useful for growing lambs.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rolo, V.; Roces-Diaz, J., V.; Torralba, M.; Kay, S.; Fagerholm, N.; Aviron, S.; Burgess, P.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Dominguez, N.; Graves, A.; Hartel, T.; Mantzanas, K.; Mosquera-Losada, M., R.; Palma, J., H.; Sidiropoulou, A.; Szerencsits, E.; Viaud, V.; Herzog, F.; Plieninger, T.; and Moreno, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecosystem Services, 50(May). 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes},\n type = {article},\n year = {2021},\n keywords = {Agroforestry systems,Ecosystem services bundles,Multifunctionality,Perceived landscape values,Public participatory GIS},\n volume = {50},\n id = {0b5be820-cc6d-3223-affa-1766ee1500c8},\n created = {2023-12-13T11:30:40.664Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-12-13T11:30:40.664Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Rural Europe encompasses a variety of landscapes with differing levels of forest, agriculture, and agroforestry that can deliver multiple ecosystem services (ES). Whilst provisioning and regulating ES associated with individual land covers are comparatively well studied, less is known about the associated cultural ES. Only seldom are provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES investigated together to evaluate how they contribute to multifunctionality. In this study we combined biophysical and sociocultural approaches to assess how different landscapes (dominated by forest, agriculture or agroforestry) and landscape characteristics (i.e. remoteness and landscape diversity) drive spatial associations of ES (i.e. synergies, trade-offs and bundles). We analysed data of: i) seven provisioning and regulating ES (spatially modelled), and; ii) six cultural ES (derived from participatory mapping data) in 12 study sites across four different biogeographical regions of Europe. Our results showed highly differentiated ES profiles for landscapes associated to a specific land cover, with agroforestry generally providing higher cultural ES than forest and agriculture. We found a positive relationship between the proportion of forest in a landscape and provisioning and regulating ES, whilst agriculture showed negative relationships. We found four distinct bundles of ES. Three of them were directly related to a dominant land cover and the fourth to a mixture of forest and agroforestry that was associated with high social value. The latter bundle was related to zones close to urban areas and roads and medium to high landscape diversity. These findings suggest that agroforestry should be prioritised over other land covers in such areas as it delivers a suite of multiple ES, provided it is close to urban areas or roads. Our results also illustrate the importance and application of including people's perception in the assessment of ES associations and highlight the relevance of developing integrated analyses of ES to inform landscape management decisions.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Rolo, Victor and Roces-Diaz, Jose V. and Torralba, Mario and Kay, Sonja and Fagerholm, Nora and Aviron, Stephanie and Burgess, Paul and Crous-Duran, Josep and Ferreiro-Dominguez, Nuria and Graves, Anil and Hartel, Tibor and Mantzanas, Konstantinos and Mosquera-Losada, María Rosa and Palma, Joao H.N. and Sidiropoulou, Anna and Szerencsits, Erich and Viaud, Valérie and Herzog, Felix and Plieninger, Tobias and Moreno, Gerardo},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101318},\n journal = {Ecosystem Services},\n number = {May}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Rural Europe encompasses a variety of landscapes with differing levels of forest, agriculture, and agroforestry that can deliver multiple ecosystem services (ES). Whilst provisioning and regulating ES associated with individual land covers are comparatively well studied, less is known about the associated cultural ES. Only seldom are provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES investigated together to evaluate how they contribute to multifunctionality. In this study we combined biophysical and sociocultural approaches to assess how different landscapes (dominated by forest, agriculture or agroforestry) and landscape characteristics (i.e. remoteness and landscape diversity) drive spatial associations of ES (i.e. synergies, trade-offs and bundles). We analysed data of: i) seven provisioning and regulating ES (spatially modelled), and; ii) six cultural ES (derived from participatory mapping data) in 12 study sites across four different biogeographical regions of Europe. Our results showed highly differentiated ES profiles for landscapes associated to a specific land cover, with agroforestry generally providing higher cultural ES than forest and agriculture. We found a positive relationship between the proportion of forest in a landscape and provisioning and regulating ES, whilst agriculture showed negative relationships. We found four distinct bundles of ES. Three of them were directly related to a dominant land cover and the fourth to a mixture of forest and agroforestry that was associated with high social value. The latter bundle was related to zones close to urban areas and roads and medium to high landscape diversity. These findings suggest that agroforestry should be prioritised over other land covers in such areas as it delivers a suite of multiple ES, provided it is close to urban areas or roads. Our results also illustrate the importance and application of including people's perception in the assessment of ES associations and highlight the relevance of developing integrated analyses of ES to inform landscape management decisions.\n

\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2020\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Preparing the Evidence Base for Post-Brexit agriculture in Scotland – Case studies on alternative payments.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lampkin, N.; Shrestha, S.; Sellars, A.; Baldock, D.; Smith, J.; Mullender, S.; Keenleyside, C.; Pearce, B.; and Watson, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Preparing$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Preparing the Evidence Base for Post-Brexit agriculture in Scotland – Case studies on alternative payments},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2020},\n issue = {12},\n id = {c1685670-9ae4-391d-9f69-c73cbe650d0d},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:38.120Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:03.808Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Lampkin, N and Shrestha, S and Sellars, A and Baldock, D and Smith, J and Mullender, S and Keenleyside, C and Pearce, B and Watson, C}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A delphi-style approach for developing an integrated food/non-food system sustainability assessment tool.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mullender, S., M.; Sandor, M.; Pisanelli, A.; Kozyra, J.; Borek, R.; Ghaley, B., B.; Gliga, A.; von Oppenkowski, M.; Roesler, T.; Salkanovic, E.; Smith, J.; and Smith, L., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84(August 2019): 106415. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"A$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A delphi-style approach for developing an integrated food/non-food system sustainability assessment tool},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Delphi,Participatory approach,Sustainability assessment,Sustainability framework,Sustainability indicator},\n pages = {106415},\n volume = {84},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106415},\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n id = {9e3f0716-97c0-3d3a-af8c-472a93911f58},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:41.709Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:07.010Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Sustainability assessment is a complex field and its uptake amongst agricultural producers limited. Furthermore, the scope of current sustainability assessment tools does not extend to systems in which food production is integrated with production of non-food biomass (e.g. agroforestry). Participatory approaches to tool development offer a means to overcome the subjectivity of researcher-led tool design and thus the potential to increase relevance and engagement. In this work we develop a Delphi-style methodology as a means to produce a sustainability assessment tool suitable to assess and feedback on an integrated food/non-food system. Using a widely accepted agricultural sustainability framework and an existing farm sustainability assessment tool as a base, stakeholders were engaged with across six countries and multiple stakeholder groups to identify key indicators to be added to the tool. The methodology developed is described in detail, framed in the setting of this tool development process but providing a novel framework applicable to any situation where indicators must be developed for a complex issue of interest across multiple perspectives and stakeholder groups. Feedback and learning from the experience is provided. It was found that, contrary to some opinion, the inclusion of a face-to-face discussion round as part of the Delphi procedure provides a valuable means for information exchange and a move towards consensus amongst stakeholders. By using a ‘snowball’ approach to the in person discussions, it appears too that the loss of the voices of more socially retiring individuals can be avoided. Final levels of agreement vary substantially across the different areas of sustainability, with indicators in some areas (e.g. environmental integrity) proving much less controversial than others (e.g. social wellbeing). Despite this, the methodology effectively reaches a level of consensus amongst diverse stakeholders sufficient to guide the selection of sustainability indicators with a good level of confidence.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Mullender, Samantha M. and Sandor, Mignon and Pisanelli, Andrea and Kozyra, Jerzy and Borek, Robert and Ghaley, Bhim B. and Gliga, Adrian and von Oppenkowski, Moritz and Roesler, Tim and Salkanovic, Eldina and Smith, Jo and Smith, Laurence G.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106415},\n journal = {Environmental Impact Assessment Review},\n number = {August 2019}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Sustainability assessment is a complex field and its uptake amongst agricultural producers limited. Furthermore, the scope of current sustainability assessment tools does not extend to systems in which food production is integrated with production of non-food biomass (e.g. agroforestry). Participatory approaches to tool development offer a means to overcome the subjectivity of researcher-led tool design and thus the potential to increase relevance and engagement. In this work we develop a Delphi-style methodology as a means to produce a sustainability assessment tool suitable to assess and feedback on an integrated food/non-food system. Using a widely accepted agricultural sustainability framework and an existing farm sustainability assessment tool as a base, stakeholders were engaged with across six countries and multiple stakeholder groups to identify key indicators to be added to the tool. The methodology developed is described in detail, framed in the setting of this tool development process but providing a novel framework applicable to any situation where indicators must be developed for a complex issue of interest across multiple perspectives and stakeholder groups. Feedback and learning from the experience is provided. It was found that, contrary to some opinion, the inclusion of a face-to-face discussion round as part of the Delphi procedure provides a valuable means for information exchange and a move towards consensus amongst stakeholders. By using a ‘snowball’ approach to the in person discussions, it appears too that the loss of the voices of more socially retiring individuals can be avoided. Final levels of agreement vary substantially across the different areas of sustainability, with indicators in some areas (e.g. environmental integrity) proving much less controversial than others (e.g. social wellbeing). Despite this, the methodology effectively reaches a level of consensus amongst diverse stakeholders sufficient to guide the selection of sustainability indicators with a good level of confidence.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Temperate agroforestry systems provide greater pollination service than monoculture.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Varah, A.; Jones, H.; Smith, J.; and Potts, S., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 301(October 2019): 107031. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Temperate$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Temperate$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Temperate agroforestry systems provide greater pollination service than monoculture},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n keywords = {Abundance,Agroforestry,Bumblebee,Hoverfly,Pollination service,Richness,Solitary bee},\n pages = {107031},\n volume = {301},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107031},\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n id = {2fa4a940-ba83-3b8c-be3d-62eec8d19828},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:53.492Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:17.912Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Insect pollination is a globally important ecosystem service, contributing to crop yields, production stability and the maintenance of wild plant populations. Ironically, agriculture is one of the major global drivers of wild insect pollinator decline. At the same time, increasing human population is driving ever greater demands on crop production. Agroforestry (AF) – a more diverse farming system integrating woody and agricultural crops – can theoretically reconcile high production with provision of ecosystem services such as pollination. However, empirical studies of pollination in temperate AF systems are almost entirely lacking. We sought to fill this knowledge gap by assessing whether AF can provide increased pollination service compared to monoculture (MC) systems. Six UK sites, each containing an AF and a MC system, were studied over three years. Wild pollinator abundance and diversity were used as proxies for the magnitude and stability, respectively, of the pollinating community. We also directly measured pollination service as seed set in a wild plant phytometer. We found that temperate AF systems can provide greater pollination service than MC: AF treatments had twice as many solitary bees and hoverflies, and in arable systems 2.4 times more bumblebees, than MC treatments. AF also had 4.5 times more seed set compared to MC in one of the two years. At 40% of site-by-year sampling units, species richness of solitary bees was on average 10.5 times higher in AF treatments. This provides evidence in favour of the expectation that AF systems can support higher pollinator richness, and therefore greater potential stability, of pollination service. For the other sampling units, and for bumblebees (Bombus spp.), there was no treatment effect on species richness. Further work is needed to investigate the effect of AF on species richness and its mechanistic basis. Our results also highlight the importance of AF system design, ensuring that ecosystem services outcomes are explicitly planned at the design stage. We suggest that AF has a role to play in improving the sustainability of modern farming and in mitigating the ongoing loss of wild pollinating insects, which is strongly driven by prevailing agricultural practices.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Varah, Alexa and Jones, Hannah and Smith, Jo and Potts, Simon G.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2020.107031},\n journal = {Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment},\n number = {October 2019}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Insect pollination is a globally important ecosystem service, contributing to crop yields, production stability and the maintenance of wild plant populations. Ironically, agriculture is one of the major global drivers of wild insect pollinator decline. At the same time, increasing human population is driving ever greater demands on crop production. Agroforestry (AF) – a more diverse farming system integrating woody and agricultural crops – can theoretically reconcile high production with provision of ecosystem services such as pollination. However, empirical studies of pollination in temperate AF systems are almost entirely lacking. We sought to fill this knowledge gap by assessing whether AF can provide increased pollination service compared to monoculture (MC) systems. Six UK sites, each containing an AF and a MC system, were studied over three years. Wild pollinator abundance and diversity were used as proxies for the magnitude and stability, respectively, of the pollinating community. We also directly measured pollination service as seed set in a wild plant phytometer. We found that temperate AF systems can provide greater pollination service than MC: AF treatments had twice as many solitary bees and hoverflies, and in arable systems 2.4 times more bumblebees, than MC treatments. AF also had 4.5 times more seed set compared to MC in one of the two years. At 40% of site-by-year sampling units, species richness of solitary bees was on average 10.5 times higher in AF treatments. This provides evidence in favour of the expectation that AF systems can support higher pollinator richness, and therefore greater potential stability, of pollination service. For the other sampling units, and for bumblebees (Bombus spp.), there was no treatment effect on species richness. Further work is needed to investigate the effect of AF on species richness and its mechanistic basis. Our results also highlight the importance of AF system design, ensuring that ecosystem services outcomes are explicitly planned at the design stage. We suggest that AF has a role to play in improving the sustainability of modern farming and in mitigating the ongoing loss of wild pollinating insects, which is strongly driven by prevailing agricultural practices.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Productivity and economic evaluation of agroforestry systems for sustainable production of food and non-food products.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lehmann, L., M.; Smith, J.; Westaway, S.; Pisanelli, A.; Russo, G.; Borek, R.; Sandor, M.; Gliga, A.; Smith, L.; and Ghaley, B., B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13): 1-9. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Productivity$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Productivity and economic evaluation of agroforestry systems for sustainable production of food and non-food products},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Economic viability,Ecosystem services,Gross margin,Land equivalent ratio},\n pages = {1-9},\n volume = {12},\n id = {3e24e403-ab3b-3736-bc2c-e06db21625f0},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:53.945Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:18.447Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry systems have multifunctional roles in enhancing agronomic productivity, co-production of diversity of food and non-food products and provision of ecosystem services. The knowledge of the performance of agroforestry systems compared with monoculture is scarce and scattered. Hence, the objective of the study was to analyze the agronomic productivity and economic viability of diverse agroforestry systems in Europe. A network of five agroforestry systems integrating arable crops, livestock and biomass trees was investigated to assess the range of agricultural products in each agroforestry system. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was used to measure the agronomic productivity, whereas gross margin was used as an indicator for economic viability assessment. LER values ranged from 1.36-2.00, indicating that agroforestry systems were more productive by 36-100% compared to monocultures. Agroforestry gross margin was lower in Denmark (112 ha-1 year-1) compared to United Kingdom (5083 ha-1 year-1) and the crop component yielded higher returns compared to negative returns from the tree component in agroforestry. Hence, the study provided robust field-based evidence on agronomic productivity and economic viability assessment of agroforestry systems in diverse contexts for informed decision making by land managers, advisory services, farmers and policymakers.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Lehmann, Lisa Mølgaard and Smith, Jo and Westaway, Sally and Pisanelli, Andrea and Russo, Giuseppe and Borek, Robert and Sandor, Mignon and Gliga, Adrian and Smith, Laurence and Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur},\n doi = {10.3390/su12135429},\n journal = {Sustainability (Switzerland)},\n number = {13}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Using the yield-SAFE model to assess the impacts of climate change on yield of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under agroforestry and monoculture systems.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gidey, T.; Oliveira, T.; Crous-Duran, J.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 94(1). 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Using the yield-SAFE model to assess the impacts of climate change on yield of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under agroforestry and monoculture systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n keywords = {Albizia gummifera,CORDEX,Ethiopia,HADCM3 model,Process-based model,System resilience},\n volume = {94},\n id = {1aa36ad1-0c2c-3df3-bcdd-0c12de71d1ed},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.840Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.840Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2019, Springer Nature B.V. Ethiopia economy depends strongly on Coffea arabica production. Coffee, like many other crops, is sensitive to climate change and recent studies have suggested that future changes in climate will have a negative impact on its yield and quality. An urgent development and application of strategies against negative impacts of climate change on coffee production is important. Agroforestry-based system is one of the strategies that may ensure sustainable coffee production amidst likelihood future impacts of climate change.This system involves the combination of trees in buffer extremes thereby modifying microclimate conditions. This paper assessed coffee production under: (1) coffee monoculture and (2) coffee grown using agroforestry system, under: (a) current climate and (b) two different future climate change scenarios. The study focused on two representative coffee growing regions of Ethiopia under different soil, climate and elevation conditions. A process-based growth model (yield-SAFE) was used to simulate coffee production for a time horizon of 40 years.Climate change scenarios considered were: representative concentration pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. The results revealed that in monoculture systems, the current coffee yields are between 1200 and 1250 kg ha−1 year−1, with expected decrease between 4–38 and 20–60% in scenarios RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively. However, in agroforestry systems, the current yields are between 1600 and 2200 kg ha−1 year−1, the decrease was lower, ranging between 4–13 and 16–25% in RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, respectively. From the results, it can be concluded that coffee production under agroforestry systems has a higher level of resilience when facing future climate change and reinforce the idea of using this type of management in the near future for adapting climate change negative impacts on coffee production.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Gidey, T. and Oliveira, T.S. and Crous-Duran, J. and Palma, J.H.N.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-019-00369-5},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry as a sustainable land use option to reduce wildfires risk in European Mediterranean areas.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Damianidis, C.; Santiago-Freijanes, J.; den Herder, M.; Burgess, P.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Graves, A.; Papadopoulos, A.; Pisanelli, A.; Camilli, F.; Rois-Díaz, M.; Kay, S.; Palma, J.; and Pantera, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry as a sustainable land use option to reduce wildfires risk in European Mediterranean areas},\n type = {article},\n year = {2020},\n keywords = {Climate change,Ecosystems,Land uses,Management,Vegetation types},\n id = {1632479d-d5a8-3a23-8efb-0f6c47e29a3b},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:33:59.490Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:33:59.490Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2020, Springer Nature B.V. Wildfires have always been an integral part of the ecology of many terrestrial ecosystems, but their frequency is increasing in many parts of the world. Wildfires were once a natural phenomenon, but after humans learned to control fire, it has been used as a management tool to increase soil fertility, to regenerate natural vegetation for grazing and to control competing vegetation. However, currently uncontrolled wildfires threaten not only natural vegetation, landscape biodiversity, communities and economies, but they also release large amounts of carbon dioxide, thus contributing to global temperature increase. Higher temperatures and drier summers have increased the risk of wildfires in biodiversity rich areas of European Mediterranean countries and have resulted in human casualties. The aim of this article is to investigate whether agroforestry, the practice of integrating woody vegetation and agricultural crops and/or livestock, could be a management tool to reduce wildfires in European Mediterranean countries. Fire events from 2008 to 2017 and data of land cover and land use were spatially correlated. Results indicated that agroforestry areas had fewer wildfire incidents than forests, shrublands or grasslands, providing evidence of the potential of agroforestry to reduce fire risk and protect ecosystems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Damianidis, C. and Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. and den Herder, M. and Burgess, P. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Graves, A. and Papadopoulos, A. and Pisanelli, A. and Camilli, F. and Rois-Díaz, M. and Kay, S. and Palma, J.H.N. and Pantera, A.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-020-00482-w},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2019\n \n \n (17)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Making hedgerows pay their way: the economics of harvesting hedges for bioenergy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Westaway, S.; Mullender, S.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; and Graves, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”., 2019. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Making$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Making hedgerows pay their way: the economics of harvesting hedges for bioenergy},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2019},\n id = {30fe7f60-96cb-3403-aa08-8ad383a85d3b},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:36.489Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:01.996Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Westaway, Sally and Mullender, Samantha and Giannitsopoulos, Michael and Graves, Anil},\n booktitle = {4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry for ruminants in Northern Europe : recent studies to address challenges expressed by stakeholders.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Novak, S.; Smith, J.; and Luske, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”., pages 1, 2019. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Agroforestry for ruminants in Northern Europe : recent studies to address challenges expressed by stakeholders},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2019},\n pages = {1},\n id = {dbee093d-91fa-3566-94c7-0be968d11635},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:36.922Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:02.397Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Novak, Sandra and Smith, Jo and Luske, Boki},\n booktitle = {4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Agroforestry Handbook: Agroforestry for the UK.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Raskin, B.; and Osbone, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{\n title = {The Agroforestry Handbook: Agroforestry for the UK},\n type = {book},\n year = {2019},\n id = {6c1f41ff-96f4-35bf-88a7-25983ef2a0f8},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:45.617Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:10.366Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {book},\n author = {Raskin, Ben and Osbone, Simone}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tree leaves as supplementary feed for ruminant livestock.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kendall, N., R.; Smith, J.; Whistance, L., K.; Stergiadis, S.; and Stoate, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Woodland Trust Research Briefing,1-4. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Tree$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Tree leaves as supplementary feed for ruminant livestock},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n pages = {1-4},\n id = {5caa74a7-f2d3-3908-8351-f3b40bb9192e},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:47.964Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:12.490Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kendall, N R and Smith, J and Whistance, L K and Stergiadis, S and Stoate, C},\n journal = {Woodland Trust Research Briefing}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kay, S.; Rega, C.; Moreno, G.; den Herder, M.; Palma, J., H.; Borek, R.; Crous-Duran, J.; Freese, D.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; Graves, A.; Jäger, M.; Lamersdorf, N.; Memedemin, D.; Mosquera-Losada, R.; Pantera, A.; Paracchini, M., L.; Paris, P.; Roces-Díaz, J., V.; Rolo, V.; Rosati, A.; Sandor, M.; Smith, J.; Szerencsits, E.; Varga, A.; Viaud, V.; Wawer, R.; Burgess, P., J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Land Use Policy, 83(January): 581-593. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Carbon storage,Climate change mitigation,Ecosystem services,Farmland,Resource protection,Spatial deficit analysis},\n pages = {581-593},\n volume = {83},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025},\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n id = {54a0200f-2ba5-3788-9dec-2b98965a10c6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:49.865Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:14.263Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and enhances biodiversity. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we combined scientific and technical knowledge to evaluate nine environmental pressures in terms of ecosystem services in European farmland and assessed the carbon storage potential of suitable agroforestry systems, proposed by regional experts. First, regions with potential environmental pressures were identified with respect to soil health (soil erosion by water and wind, low soil organic carbon), water quality (water pollution by nitrates, salinization by irrigation), areas affected by climate change (rising temperature), and by underprovision in biodiversity (pollination and pest control pressures, loss of soil biodiversity). The maps were overlaid to identify areas where several pressures accumulate. In total, 94.4% of farmlands suffer from at least one environmental pressure, pastures being less affected than arable lands. Regional hotspots were located in north-western France, Denmark, Central Spain, north and south-western Italy, Greece, and eastern Romania. The 10% of the area with the highest number of accumulated pressures were defined as Priority Areas, where the implementation of agroforestry could be particularly effective. In a second step, European agroforestry experts were asked to propose agroforestry practices suitable for the Priority Areas they were familiar with, and identified 64 different systems covering a wide range of practices. These ranged from hedgerows on field boundaries to fast growing coppices or scattered single tree systems. Third, for each proposed system, the carbon storage potential was assessed based on data from the literature and the results were scaled-up to the Priority Areas. As expected, given the wide range of agroforestry practices identified, the carbon sequestration potentials ranged between 0.09 and 7.29 t C ha −1 a −1 . Implementing agroforestry on the Priority Areas could lead to a sequestration of 2.1 to 63.9 million t C a −1 (7.78 and 234.85 million t CO 2eq a −1 ) depending on the type of agroforestry. This corresponds to between 1.4 and 43.4% of European agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, promoting agroforestry in the Priority Areas would contribute to mitigate the environmental pressures identified there. We conclude that the strategic and spatially targeted establishment of agroforestry systems could provide an effective means of meeting EU policy objectives on GHG emissions whilst providing a range of other important benefits.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kay, Sonja and Rega, Carlo and Moreno, Gerardo and den Herder, Michael and Palma, João H.N. and Borek, Robert and Crous-Duran, Josep and Freese, Dirk and Giannitsopoulos, Michail and Graves, Anil and Jäger, Mareike and Lamersdorf, Norbert and Memedemin, Daniyar and Mosquera-Losada, Rosa and Pantera, Anastasia and Paracchini, Maria Luisa and Paris, Pierluigi and Roces-Díaz, José V. and Rolo, Victor and Rosati, Adolfo and Sandor, Mignon and Smith, Jo and Szerencsits, Erich and Varga, Anna and Viaud, Valérie and Wawer, Rafal and Burgess, Paul J. and Herzog, Felix},\n doi = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025},\n journal = {Land Use Policy},\n number = {January}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and enhances biodiversity. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we combined scientific and technical knowledge to evaluate nine environmental pressures in terms of ecosystem services in European farmland and assessed the carbon storage potential of suitable agroforestry systems, proposed by regional experts. First, regions with potential environmental pressures were identified with respect to soil health (soil erosion by water and wind, low soil organic carbon), water quality (water pollution by nitrates, salinization by irrigation), areas affected by climate change (rising temperature), and by underprovision in biodiversity (pollination and pest control pressures, loss of soil biodiversity). The maps were overlaid to identify areas where several pressures accumulate. In total, 94.4% of farmlands suffer from at least one environmental pressure, pastures being less affected than arable lands. Regional hotspots were located in north-western France, Denmark, Central Spain, north and south-western Italy, Greece, and eastern Romania. The 10% of the area with the highest number of accumulated pressures were defined as Priority Areas, where the implementation of agroforestry could be particularly effective. In a second step, European agroforestry experts were asked to propose agroforestry practices suitable for the Priority Areas they were familiar with, and identified 64 different systems covering a wide range of practices. These ranged from hedgerows on field boundaries to fast growing coppices or scattered single tree systems. Third, for each proposed system, the carbon storage potential was assessed based on data from the literature and the results were scaled-up to the Priority Areas. As expected, given the wide range of agroforestry practices identified, the carbon sequestration potentials ranged between 0.09 and 7.29 t C ha −1 a −1 . Implementing agroforestry on the Priority Areas could lead to a sequestration of 2.1 to 63.9 million t C a −1 (7.78 and 234.85 million t CO 2eq a −1 ) depending on the type of agroforestry. This corresponds to between 1.4 and 43.4% of European agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, promoting agroforestry in the Priority Areas would contribute to mitigate the environmental pressures identified there. We conclude that the strategic and spatially targeted establishment of agroforestry systems could provide an effective means of meeting EU policy objectives on GHG emissions whilst providing a range of other important benefits.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Evaluating the effects of integrating trees into temperate arable systems on pest control and pollination.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Staton, T.; Walters, R., J.; Smith, J.; and Girling, R., D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agricultural Systems, 176(August): 102676. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Evaluating$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Evaluating$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Evaluating the effects of integrating trees into temperate arable systems on pest control and pollination},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Alley cropping,Conservation biological control,Natural enemies,Pollinators,Sustainable agriculture},\n pages = {102676},\n volume = {176},\n websites = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102676},\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n id = {d9cbfd79-3991-36c3-bbf4-aefd80dce7f6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:54.373Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:18.934Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry systems, which incorporate trees into agricultural land, could contribute to sustainable agricultural intensification as they have been shown to increase land productivity, biodiversity and some regulating ecosystem services. However, the effect of temperate agroforestry systems on pest control and pollination services has not been comprehensively reviewed, despite the importance of these services for sustainable intensification. We review and analyse the available evidence for silvoarable agroforestry systems, following which we propose a predictive framework for future research to explain the observed variation in results, based on ecological theory and evidence from analogous systems. Of the 12 studies included in our meta-analysis of natural enemies and pests, the observed increases in natural enemy abundance (+24%) and decreases in arthropod herbivore/pest abundance (−25%) in silvoarable systems were both significant, but molluscan pests were more abundant in silvoarable systems in the two available studies. Only three studies reported effects on pollinators, but all found higher abundance in silvoarable compared with arable systems. Measures of pest control or pollination service are scarce, but suggest stronger effect sizes. Our framework seeks to establish hypotheses for future research through an interpretation of our findings in the context of the wider literature, including landscape characteristics, silvoarable system design and management, system maturity, trophic interactions and experimental design. The findings of this study suggest that silvoarable systems can contribute to sustainable intensification by enhancing beneficial invertebrates and suppressing arthropod pests compared with arable, but future research should include measures of pest control and pollination and implications for productivity and economic value.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Staton, Tom and Walters, Richard J. and Smith, Jo and Girling, Robbie D.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102676},\n journal = {Agricultural Systems},\n number = {August}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Elm Farm : Planning and developing agroforestry at a farm scale.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Woodland Trust Research Briefing, (December). 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Elm$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Elm Farm : Planning and developing agroforestry at a farm scale},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n id = {bb0ace25-a071-3f76-909a-25eee3a647a2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:55.397Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:19.867Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Smith, Jo},\n journal = {Woodland Trust Research Briefing},\n number = {December}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Use of uncomposted woodchip as a soil improver in arable and horticultural soils On - farm trials.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Rousseau, A.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”., pages 2000, 2019. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Use$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Use of uncomposted woodchip as a soil improver in arable and horticultural soils On - farm trials},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2019},\n pages = {2000},\n id = {67f0e523-7d38-3d36-b2a7-313b98a25c73},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:55.833Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:20.310Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Rousseau, Anais and Smith, Jo},\n booktitle = {4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Prof . Martin Wolfe , the farmers Darwin The story of Wakelyns Agroforestry and decentralised food and energy production.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”., 2019. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Prof$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Prof . Martin Wolfe , the farmers Darwin The story of Wakelyns Agroforestry and decentralised food and energy production},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2019},\n id = {8bceba52-9249-3bf6-ae74-2bf385c01b1c},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:56.279Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:20.706Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Smith, Jo},\n booktitle = {4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Barriers to the uptake of agroforestry in the UK.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”., pages 727872, 2019. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Barriers$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Barriers$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Barriers to the uptake of agroforestry in the UK},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {agroforestry adoption,silvoarable,silvopastoral},\n pages = {727872},\n issue = {727872},\n websites = {https://zenodo.org/record/3236308},\n id = {0f8e4793-14a4-3282-a41e-34c3b2180ba2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:56.737Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:21.468Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Smith, Jo},\n booktitle = {4th World Congress of Agroforestry, “Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy”.}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling tree density effects on provisioning ecosystem services in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Crous-Duran, J.; Graves, A.; Paulo, J.; Mirck, J.; Oliveira, T.; Kay, S.; García de Jalón, S.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 93(5). 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling tree density effects on provisioning ecosystem services in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Agroforestry systems,Dehesa,Montado,Short rotation coppice,Silvoarable,Silvopasture,Yield-SAFE},\n volume = {93},\n id = {41ee1365-6fe7-3ed2-ba36-c6887f568ca2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.419Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.419Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2018, Springer Nature B.V. Agroforestry systems, in which trees are integrated in arable or pasture land, can be used to enable sustainable food, material, and energy production (i.e. provide provisioning ecosystem services) whilst reducing the negative environmental impacts associated with farming. However, one constraint on the uptake of agroforestry in Europe is a lack of knowledge on how specific agroforestry designs affect productivity. A process-based biophysical model, called Yield-SAFE, was used: (1) to quantify the food, material and biomass energy production of four contrasting case study systems in Europe in a common energy unit (MJ ha−1), and (2) to quantify how tree density determined the supply of provisioning ecosystem services. The Yield-SAFE model was calibrated so that simulated tree and crop growth fitted observed growth data for reference monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems. The modelled results showed that including trees in pasture or arable systems increased the overall accumulated energy of the system in comparison with monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems, but that the accumulated energy per tree was reduced as tree density increased. The greatest accumulated energy occurred in the highest tree density agroforestry system at all the case study sites. This suggests that the capture of environmental resources, such as light and water, for obtaining provisioning services is most effective in high density agroforestry systems. Further modelling should include tree canopy effects on micro-climatic and the impact this has on pasture, crop, and livestock yields, as well as the impact of tree density on the economic value and management of the different systems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Crous-Duran, J. and Graves, A.R. and Paulo, J.A. and Mirck, J. and Oliveira, T.S. and Kay, S. and García de Jalón, S. and Palma, J.H.N.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-018-0297-4},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {5}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling tree density effects on provisioning ecosystem services in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Crous-Duran, J.; Graves, A.; Paulo, J.; Mirck, J.; Oliveira, T.; Kay, S.; García de Jalón, S.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 93(5). 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling tree density effects on provisioning ecosystem services in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Agroforestry systems,Dehesa,Montado,Short rotation coppice,Silvoarable,Silvopasture,Yield-SAFE},\n volume = {93},\n id = {58aafd19-9f85-34a8-86f2-74dd7c2ed877},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.014Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.014Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2018, Springer Nature B.V. Agroforestry systems, in which trees are integrated in arable or pasture land, can be used to enable sustainable food, material, and energy production (i.e. provide provisioning ecosystem services) whilst reducing the negative environmental impacts associated with farming. However, one constraint on the uptake of agroforestry in Europe is a lack of knowledge on how specific agroforestry designs affect productivity. A process-based biophysical model, called Yield-SAFE, was used: (1) to quantify the food, material and biomass energy production of four contrasting case study systems in Europe in a common energy unit (MJ ha−1), and (2) to quantify how tree density determined the supply of provisioning ecosystem services. The Yield-SAFE model was calibrated so that simulated tree and crop growth fitted observed growth data for reference monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems. The modelled results showed that including trees in pasture or arable systems increased the overall accumulated energy of the system in comparison with monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems, but that the accumulated energy per tree was reduced as tree density increased. The greatest accumulated energy occurred in the highest tree density agroforestry system at all the case study sites. This suggests that the capture of environmental resources, such as light and water, for obtaining provisioning services is most effective in high density agroforestry systems. Further modelling should include tree canopy effects on micro-climatic and the impact this has on pasture, crop, and livestock yields, as well as the impact of tree density on the economic value and management of the different systems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Crous-Duran, J. and Graves, A.R. and Paulo, J.A. and Mirck, J. and Oliveira, T.S. and Kay, S. and García de Jalón, S. and Palma, J.H.N.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-018-0297-4},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {5}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dry deposition of air pollutants on trees at regional scale: A case study in the Basque Country.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n García de Jalón, S.; Burgess, P.; Curiel Yuste, J.; Moreno, G.; Graves, A.; Palma, J.; Crous-Duran, J.; Kay, S.; and Chiabai, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 278. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Dry deposition of air pollutants on trees at regional scale: A case study in the Basque Country},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Deposition velocity,Health,Land cover,Pollutant,Vegetation},\n volume = {278},\n id = {e1c29b22-b701-36e5-9c9c-baf641d808d3},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.269Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.269Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2019 Elsevier B.V. There is increased interest in the role of trees to reduce air pollution and thereby improve human health and well-being. This study determined the removal of air pollutants by dry deposition of trees across the Basque Country and estimated its annual economic value. A model that calculates the hourly dry deposition of NO2, O3, SO2, CO and PM10 on trees at a 1 km x 1 km resolution at a regional scale was developed. The calculated mean annual rates of removal of air pollution across various land uses were 12.9 kg O3 ha−1, 12.7 kg PM10 ha−1, 3.0 kg NO2 ha−1, 0.8 kg SO2 ha−1 and 0.2 kg CO ha−1. The results were then categorised according to land use in order to determine how much each land use category contributed to reducing air pollution and to determine to what extent trees provided pollution reduction benefits to society. Despite not being located in the areas of highest pollutions, coniferous forests, which cover 25% of the land, were calculated to absorb 21% of the air pollution. Compared to other land uses, coniferous forests were particularly effective in removing air pollution because of their high tree cover density and the duration of leaf life-span. The total economic value provided by the trees in reducing these pollutants in terms of health benefits was estimated to be €60 million yr−1 which represented around 0.09% of the Gross Domestic Product of the Basque Country in 2016. Whilst most health impacts from air pollution are in urban areas the results indicate that most air pollution is removed in rural areas.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {García de Jalón, S. and Burgess, P.J. and Curiel Yuste, J. and Moreno, G. and Graves, A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Crous-Duran, J. and Kay, S. and Chiabai, A.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107648},\n journal = {Agricultural and Forest Meteorology}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry is paying off – Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kay, S.; Graves, A.; Palma, J.; Moreno, G.; Roces-Díaz, J.; Aviron, S.; Chouvardas, D.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; García de Jalón, S.; Măcicăşan, V.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Pantera, A.; Santiago-Freijanes, J.; Szerencsits, E.; Torralba, M.; Burgess, P.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecosystem Services, 36. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry is paying off – Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Biomass production,Carbon storage,External cost,Nutrient loss,Pollination deficit,Soil loss},\n volume = {36},\n id = {050aacec-72b4-397e-807e-238d7d5d1ded},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.861Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-10-19T14:44:13.846Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2019 Elsevier B.V. The study assessed the economic performance of marketable ecosystem services (ES) (biomass production) and non-marketable ecosystem services and dis-services (groundwater, nutrient loss, soil loss, carbon sequestration, pollination deficit) in 11 contrasting European landscapes dominated by agroforestry land use compared to business as usual agricultural practice. The productivity and profitability of the farming activities and the associated ES were quantified using environmental modelling and economic valuation. After accounting for labour and machinery costs the financial value of the outputs of Mediterranean agroforestry systems tended to be greater than the corresponding agricultural system; but in Atlantic and Continental regions the agricultural system tended to be more profitable. However, when economic values for the associated ES were included, the relative profitability of agroforestry increased. Agroforestry landscapes: (i) were associated to reduced externalities of pollution from nutrient and soil losses, and (ii) generated additional benefits from carbon capture and storage and thus generated an overall higher economic gain. Our findings underline how a market system that includes the values of broader ES would result in land use change favouring multifunctional agroforestry. Imposing penalties for dis-services or payments for services would reflect their real world prices and would make agroforestry a more financially profitable system.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kay, S. and Graves, A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Moreno, G. and Roces-Díaz, J.V. and Aviron, S. and Chouvardas, D. and Crous-Duran, J. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and García de Jalón, S. and Măcicăşan, V. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Pantera, A. and Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. and Szerencsits, E. and Torralba, M. and Burgess, P.J. and Herzog, F.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896},\n journal = {Ecosystem Services}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kay, S.; Rega, C.; Moreno, G.; den Herder, M.; Palma, J.; Borek, R.; Crous-Duran, J.; Freese, D.; Giannitsopoulos, M.; Graves, A.; Jäger, M.; Lamersdorf, N.; Memedemin, D.; Mosquera-Losada, R.; Pantera, A.; Paracchini, M.; Paris, P.; Roces-Díaz, J.; Rolo, V.; Rosati, A.; Sandor, M.; Smith, J.; Szerencsits, E.; Varga, A.; Viaud, V.; Wawer, R.; Burgess, P.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Land Use Policy, 83. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Carbon storage,Climate change mitigation,Ecosystem services,Farmland,Resource protection,Spatial deficit analysis},\n volume = {83},\n id = {77f5619a-698d-33ce-a7f8-8e8ad6adbcfb},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.730Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.730Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2019 The Authors  Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and enhances biodiversity. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we combined scientific and technical knowledge to evaluate nine environmental pressures in terms of ecosystem services in European farmland and assessed the carbon storage potential of suitable agroforestry systems, proposed by regional experts. First, regions with potential environmental pressures were identified with respect to soil health (soil erosion by water and wind, low soil organic carbon), water quality (water pollution by nitrates, salinization by irrigation), areas affected by climate change (rising temperature), and by underprovision in biodiversity (pollination and pest control pressures, loss of soil biodiversity). The maps were overlaid to identify areas where several pressures accumulate. In total, 94.4% of farmlands suffer from at least one environmental pressure, pastures being less affected than arable lands. Regional hotspots were located in north-western France, Denmark, Central Spain, north and south-western Italy, Greece, and eastern Romania. The 10% of the area with the highest number of accumulated pressures were defined as Priority Areas, where the implementation of agroforestry could be particularly effective. In a second step, European agroforestry experts were asked to propose agroforestry practices suitable for the Priority Areas they were familiar with, and identified 64 different systems covering a wide range of practices. These ranged from hedgerows on field boundaries to fast growing coppices or scattered single tree systems. Third, for each proposed system, the carbon storage potential was assessed based on data from the literature and the results were scaled-up to the Priority Areas. As expected, given the wide range of agroforestry practices identified, the carbon sequestration potentials ranged between 0.09 and 7.29 t C ha −1 a −1 . Implementing agroforestry on the Priority Areas could lead to a sequestration of 2.1 to 63.9 million t C a −1 (7.78 and 234.85 million t CO 2eq a −1 ) depending on the type of agroforestry. This corresponds to between 1.4 and 43.4% of European agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, promoting agroforestry in the Priority Areas would contribute to mitigate the environmental pressures identified there. We conclude that the strategic and spatially targeted establishment of agroforestry systems could provide an effective means of meeting EU policy objectives on GHG emissions whilst providing a range of other important benefits.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kay, S. and Rega, C. and Moreno, G. and den Herder, M. and Palma, J.H.N. and Borek, R. and Crous-Duran, J. and Freese, D. and Giannitsopoulos, M. and Graves, A. and Jäger, M. and Lamersdorf, N. and Memedemin, D. and Mosquera-Losada, R. and Pantera, A. and Paracchini, M.L. and Paris, P. and Roces-Díaz, J.V. and Rolo, V. and Rosati, A. and Sandor, M. and Smith, J. and Szerencsits, E. and Varga, A. and Viaud, V. and Wawer, R. and Burgess, P.J. and Herzog, F.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025},\n journal = {Land Use Policy}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n © 2019 The Authors Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and enhances biodiversity. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we combined scientific and technical knowledge to evaluate nine environmental pressures in terms of ecosystem services in European farmland and assessed the carbon storage potential of suitable agroforestry systems, proposed by regional experts. First, regions with potential environmental pressures were identified with respect to soil health (soil erosion by water and wind, low soil organic carbon), water quality (water pollution by nitrates, salinization by irrigation), areas affected by climate change (rising temperature), and by underprovision in biodiversity (pollination and pest control pressures, loss of soil biodiversity). The maps were overlaid to identify areas where several pressures accumulate. In total, 94.4% of farmlands suffer from at least one environmental pressure, pastures being less affected than arable lands. Regional hotspots were located in north-western France, Denmark, Central Spain, north and south-western Italy, Greece, and eastern Romania. The 10% of the area with the highest number of accumulated pressures were defined as Priority Areas, where the implementation of agroforestry could be particularly effective. In a second step, European agroforestry experts were asked to propose agroforestry practices suitable for the Priority Areas they were familiar with, and identified 64 different systems covering a wide range of practices. These ranged from hedgerows on field boundaries to fast growing coppices or scattered single tree systems. Third, for each proposed system, the carbon storage potential was assessed based on data from the literature and the results were scaled-up to the Priority Areas. As expected, given the wide range of agroforestry practices identified, the carbon sequestration potentials ranged between 0.09 and 7.29 t C ha −1 a −1 . Implementing agroforestry on the Priority Areas could lead to a sequestration of 2.1 to 63.9 million t C a −1 (7.78 and 234.85 million t CO 2eq a −1 ) depending on the type of agroforestry. This corresponds to between 1.4 and 43.4% of European agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, promoting agroforestry in the Priority Areas would contribute to mitigate the environmental pressures identified there. We conclude that the strategic and spatially targeted establishment of agroforestry systems could provide an effective means of meeting EU policy objectives on GHG emissions whilst providing a range of other important benefits.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Assessing food sustainable intensification potential of agroforestry using a carbon balance method.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Crous-Duran, J.; Graves, A.; Garcia-De-Jalón, S.; Paulo, J.; Tomé, M.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n IForest, 12(1). 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Assessing food sustainable intensification potential of agroforestry using a carbon balance method},\n type = {article},\n year = {2019},\n keywords = {Carbon sequestration,Climate change mitigation,Clipick,Food security,Land-use occupation,Life cycle analysis,Regulating ecosystem services,Soil fertility,Yield-SAFE},\n volume = {12},\n id = {8c890fc1-8b0e-30e2-9501-02e8e822d9f6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:33.011Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:33.011Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© SISEF.  Food security, climate change mitigation, and land use challenges are interlinked and need to be considered simultaneously. One possible solution is sustainable intensification, which is the practice of increasing food production per area of land whilst also reducing the environmental impacts associated with this. Agroforestry has been stated to be a practice that meets this definition. In this study, a new methodology is presented to assess the potential of different management options as sustainable intensification practices. The methodology is based on comparing the carbon emissions associated with the production of food and the carbon sequestered for that same activity for a particular quantity of food produced over a specific area and over a specific time. The resulting indicator, the “carbon balance” is the difference between the greenhouse gasses emitted (considered as negative values) and carbon sequestered (positive values) estimated in Mg CO 2eq per Mg of food produced on one hectare of land for one year. The carbon balance quantifies the global warming potential associated with sustainable intensification by integrating a process-based model with life cycle analysis and is able to estimate above-and below-ground biomass and soil carbon content. This methodology is tested in Portugal for wheat production under crop monoculture and agroforestry systems. The results show agroforestry to be a suitable practice for sustainable intensification compared to a crop monoculture as it just slightly decreased wheat yields whilst providing a positive carbon balance from year 50 onwards of approximately 1 Mg of CO 2eq sequestered per Mg of wheat produced.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Crous-Duran, J. and Graves, A.R. and Garcia-De-Jalón, S. and Paulo, J.A. and Tomé, M. and Palma, J.H.N.},\n doi = {10.3832/ifor2578-011},\n journal = {IForest},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling agroforestry systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Burgess PJ, Graves AR, García de Jalón S, Palma JHN, Dupraz C, v., N., M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry for sustainable agriculture. Mosquera-Losada M R, P., R., editor(s). Burleigh Dodds, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inbook{\n type = {inbook},\n year = {2019},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.19103/AS.2018.0041.13},\n publisher = {Burleigh Dodds},\n id = {7c50b044-b0ec-34a8-b119-89538a7576c4},\n created = {2023-12-12T18:44:48.562Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2023-12-12T18:44:48.562Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inbook},\n author = {Burgess PJ, Graves AR, García de Jalón S, Palma JHN, Dupraz C, van Noordwijk M},\n editor = {Mosquera-Losada M R, Prabhu R},\n doi = {10.1201/9780429275500},\n chapter = {Modelling agroforestry systems},\n title = {Agroforestry for sustainable agriculture}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2018\n \n \n (7)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; and Mosquera-Losada, R., M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Rosati, A.; Pantera, A.; Pisanelli, A.; Vityi, A.; Reubens, B.; Lojka, B.; Dupraz, C.; Herzog, F.; Lawson, G.; Paulo, J., A.; Palma, J., H.; Smith, J.; González-Hernández, M., P.; Rois-Díaz, M.; Lamersdorf, N.; Paris, P.; Borek, R.; Kachova, V.; Yukhnovskyi, V.; and Nelissen, V., editor(s), Proceedings of the 4th European Agroforestry Conference Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use, 2018. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2018},\n id = {02e0c63a-96ef-31b1-a908-2c91a4ba4983},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:46.136Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:10.777Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Ferreiro-Domínguez, Nuria and Mosquera-Losada, Rosa M.},\n editor = {Rosati, Adolfo and Pantera, Anastasia and Pisanelli, Andrea and Vityi, Andrea and Reubens, Bert and Lojka, Bohdan and Dupraz, Christian and Herzog, Felix and Lawson, Gerry and Paulo, Joana Amaral and Palma, João H.N. and Smith, Jo and González-Hernández, María Pilar and Rois-Díaz, Mercedes and Lamersdorf, Norbert and Paris, Pierluigi and Borek, Robert and Kachova, Vania and Yukhnovskyi, Vasiliy and Nelissen, Victoria},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th European Agroforestry Conference Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry in the European common agricultural policy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mosquera-Losada, M., R.; Santiago-Freijanes, J., J.; Pisanelli, A.; Rois-Díaz, M.; Smith, J.; den Herder, M.; Moreno, G.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Malignier, N.; Lamersdorf, N.; Balaguer, F.; Pantera, A.; Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A.; Aldrey, J., A.; González-Hernández, M., P.; Fernández-Lorenzo, J., L.; Romero-Franco, R.; and Burgess, P., J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 92(4): 1117-1127. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry in the European common agricultural policy},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n keywords = {Cross-compliance,Greening,Pillar I,Pillar II,Rural development programs},\n pages = {1117-1127},\n volume = {92},\n id = {88405920-28a4-36f5-8331-41ffae55bc77},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:48.896Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:13.411Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry is a sustainable land management system that should be more strongly promoted in Europe to ensure adequate ecosystem service provision in the old continent (Decision 529/2013) through the common agricultural policy (CAP). The promotion of the woody component in Europe can be appreciated in different sections of the CAP linked to Pillar I (direct payments and Greening) and Pillar II (rural development programs). However, agroforestry is not recognised as such in the CAP, with the exception of the Measure 8.2 of Pillar II. The lack of recognition of agroforestry practices within the different sections of the CAP reduces the impact of CAP activities by overlooking the optimum combinations that would maximise the productivity of land where agroforestry could be promoted, considering both the spatial and temporal scales.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Mosquera-Losada, M. R. and Santiago-Freijanes, J. J. and Pisanelli, A. and Rois-Díaz, M. and Smith, J. and den Herder, M. and Moreno, G. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Malignier, N. and Lamersdorf, N. and Balaguer, F. and Pantera, A. and Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A. and Aldrey, J. A. and González-Hernández, M. P. and Fernández-Lorenzo, J. L. and Romero-Franco, R. and Burgess, P. J.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-018-0251-5},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Multi-Factorial Sustainability Assessment of Five European Agroforestry Farms.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, L.; Smith, J.; Wolfe, M.; Ghaley, B.; Pisanelli, A.; Russo, G.; Sandor, M.; Gliga, A.; Wawer, R.; and Borek, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Proceedings of the 4 th European Agroforestry Conference. Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use, (2): 15. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A Multi-Factorial Sustainability Assessment of Five European Agroforestry Farms},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n pages = {15},\n id = {cedc5abd-7ddb-33d9-9cf3-8f47fb3a42ed},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:51.599Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:16.176Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, LG and Smith, J and Wolfe, M and Ghaley, BB and Pisanelli, A and Russo, G and Sandor, M and Gliga, A and Wawer, R and Borek, Robert},\n journal = {Proceedings of the 4 th European Agroforestry Conference. Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tree fodder in UK livestock systems: opportunities and barriers.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Westaway, S.; and Whistance, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n EURAF Conference Nijmegen, (May): 324-327. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Tree$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Tree fodder in UK livestock systems: opportunities and barriers.},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n keywords = {minerals,salicylic acid,silvopastoral systems,tannins},\n pages = {324-327},\n id = {aaee6cb5-2620-332c-8df8-b5bb448fff4c},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:52.077Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:16.618Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, J. and Westaway, S. and Whistance, L.},\n journal = {EURAF Conference Nijmegen},\n number = {May}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Interactions Between Trees , Crops and Animals : Experiences in a Novel Bioenergy- Livestock System in the Uk.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Deremetz, V.; Gerrard, C.; and Costanzo, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Proceedings of the 4th European Agroforestry Conference: Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use, 2016(August 2015): 479-484. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Interactions$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Interactions Between Trees , Crops and Animals : Experiences in a Novel Bioenergy- Livestock System in the Uk},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n keywords = {biodiversity,competition,earthworms,silvopastoral systems,tree protection},\n pages = {479-484},\n volume = {2016},\n id = {71d6d7c3-e4be-347c-b3da-dae400a2b7d2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:52.558Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:17.039Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Managing the interactions between trees, crops and animals is an on-going challenge for agroforestry farmers. This paper reports on interactions between trees, crops and both wild animals and livestock in the establishment years of a novel UK agroforestry system combining short rotation coppice for energy production with livestock production. Our trials suggest that in the first six years there is no significant impact of trees on the alley crops (pasture and whole crop oat silage) in this system. Protecting the trees from livestock damage is essential in the early years; with cattle, our results show that it this is possible using a single stranded electric fence. Patterns of biodiversity varied between taxa; earthworm abundances were higher in the tree rows, which represent an undisturbed stable habitat, while the more active ground beetles were in greater abundances in the crop alleys which may reflect higher levels of prey within the crop.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, J and Deremetz, V and Gerrard, C and Costanzo, A},\n journal = {Proceedings of the 4th European Agroforestry Conference: Agroforestry as Sustainable Land Use},\n number = {August 2015}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A comparison of the performance of three sward mixtures sown under trees in a silvopoultry system in the UK.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Kling, C.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 92(4): 1009-1018. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A comparison of the performance of three sward mixtures sown under trees in a silvopoultry system in the UK},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n keywords = {Free range,Organic,Silvopoultry,Sward mixture,Understorey},\n pages = {1009-1018},\n volume = {92},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {f77fba86-89cb-3c9e-be1c-13106ff476cc},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:53.061Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:17.436Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Establishment of trees in the range as part of a silvopoultry system is considered to improve poultry welfare as well as provide wider environmental benefits. However one issue with these systems is a lack of understorey vegetation. This paper outlines the results of a trial on an organic poultry unit in southern England. The trial aimed to identify an understorey sward mixture able to establish and persist in a commercial poultry unit. Three sward mixtures (a standard grass and legume mix, a grass only mix, and a diverse sward mix) were sown in replicated 15 year old mixed broadleaf plots and compared with a natural regeneration control. Chickens were excluded for the first 3 months to allow sward establishment and then introduced for a 6 week period at two densities. Growth and establishment of the sward mixes along with the presence and abundance of unsown plants and unpalatable weeds was assessed. All mixtures established well under trees and didn’t show significant differences in cover after 6 weeks. Sward cover increased after 4 weeks suggesting minimum establishment period and higher weed suppression potential after this. Sowing any of the sward mixtures reduced the abundance of unpalatable weeds compared to the control. The commercially available standard sward mixture performed well compared to the other mixes, showing significantly higher biomass production by week six. Following the introduction of chickens, the sward mixtures survived only in the block with lower chicken pressure, measured by distance from house. Results from this trial demonstrate that establishing a sward under trees is possible but that the challenge is to maintain the sward in the presence of chickens. Excluding chickens initially to aid establishment and then optimising chicken pressure appears to be the key to maintaining a sward.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Kling, Charlotte and Smith, Jo},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0142-1},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Understory effect on tree and cork growth in cork oak woodlands.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Faias, S.; Paulo, J.; Palma, J.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Systems, 27(1). 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Understory effect on tree and cork growth in cork oak woodlands},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n keywords = {Cork ring,Cork thickness,Linear mixed model,Lupine,Quercus suber,Shrubs},\n volume = {27},\n id = {ee5093b2-0fa5-3aa1-a159-bd9cebfdec12},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.519Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.519Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2018 INIA. Aim of study: Cork oak is one of the main forest tree species in Portugal that typically occurs in montado, where operational practices oriented to the tree, crop or animal management may influence several of the ecosystem components. This study aimed at contributing to fulfil the a lack of knowledge on the effect of these practices on the cork and wood growth, by comparing the wood diameter growth and the annual cork increment under two different understory management options. Material and methods: An experimental trial implemented on an uneven-aged cork oak pure stand during a cork rotation period of 9 years, was established with the specific goal of comparing understory management options: a yellow lupine pasture versus spontaneous vegetation. Cork samples were taken at the beginning and end of the period and were used to measure cork thickness and annual cork rings. The differences between treatments were assessed performing a non-parametric test and a more robust approach using linear mixed model. Precipitation and treatment levels were jointly considered on the analysis. Main results: A slight effect was found on the cork thickness regarding the treatment with lupine application. However, no distinct effect was found, regarding wood and the annual cork increment pattern. Additionally, annual cork ring width showed a positive correlation with precipitation and a negative correlation with ring age. Research highlights: The results of this study indicate no distinct pattern regarding the annual cork and wood increment when comparing the understory effect of yellow lupine pasture versus spontaneous vegetation.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Faias, S.P. and Paulo, J.A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Tomé, M.},\n doi = {10.5424/fs/2018271-11967},\n journal = {Forest Systems},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2017\n \n \n (13)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroecology and Organic Farming as Approaches to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Chemicals.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lampkin, N., H.; Smith, J.; and Smith, L., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, 2017-Janua(43): 94-113. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroecology$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroecology and Organic Farming as Approaches to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Chemicals},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n pages = {94-113},\n volume = {2017-Janua},\n id = {214ea684-5861-3e11-8d9c-bdd758bc8804},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:48.450Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:12.931Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroecological approaches to food production, including organic farming, rely on improved understanding of ecological principles and their application to the management of agroecosystems in order to reduce agrochemical use and improve the environmental impact of the production systems. Agroecological approaches place increased reliance on biological processes such as symbiotic nitrogen fixation, biological control of pests and pathogens, species and habitat diversity, and closer integration of crop and livestock production, to achieve productivity, health, environmental and financial objectives. In most cases they are associated with positive environmental impacts in terms of biodiversity, resource use and emissions, but with potential trade-offs against productivity, particularly where certain inputs are avoided completely, as in the case of organic farming. In such cases, there are also potentially negative impacts on profitability, but these can be mitigated through the use of specialist markets for organic products and through agri-environmental support or payments for ecosystem services. In the longer term, there is potential for both the environmental benefits and productivity of such systems to be enhanced through research, education and knowledge exchange, engaging practitioners directly, with an increased emphasis on ecological innovation alongside the more traditional focus on technological innovation.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Lampkin, Nicolas H. and Smith, Jo and Smith, Laurence G.},\n doi = {10.1039/9781782626916-00094},\n journal = {Issues in Environmental Science and Technology},\n number = {43}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n den Herder, M.; Moreno, G.; Mosquera-Losada, R.; Palma, J.; Sidiropoulou, A.; Santiago Freijanes, J.; Crous-Duran, J.; Paulo, J.; Tomé, M.; Pantera, A.; Papanastasis, V.; Mantzanas, K.; Pachana, P.; Papadopoulos, A.; Plieninger, T.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 241. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {High natural and cultural value,High value trees,Land cover,Land use,Land use/cover area frame survey (LUCAS)},\n volume = {241},\n id = {d6aa38a0-8e33-3e06-bf38-71e2f48928e9},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.235Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.235Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Elsevier B.V. An accurate and objective estimate on the extent of agroforestry in Europe is critical for the development of supporting policies. For this reason, a more harmonised and uniform Pan-European estimate is needed. The aim of this study was to quantify and map the distribution of agroforestry in the European Union. We classified agroforestry into three main types of agroforestry systems: arable agroforestry, livestock agroforestry and high value tree agroforestry. These three classes are partly overlapping as high value tree agroforestry can be part of either arable or livestock agroforestry. Agroforestry areas were mapped using LUCAS Land Use and Land Cover data (Eurostat, 2015). By identifying certain combinations of primary and secondary land cover and/or land management it was possible to identify agroforestry points and stratify them in the three different systems. According to our estimate using the LUCAS database the total area under agroforestry in the EU 27 is about 15.4 million ha which is equivalent to about 3.6% of the territorial area and 8.8% of the utilised agricultural area. Of our three studied systems, livestock agroforestry covers about 15.1 million ha which is by far the largest area. High value tree agroforestry and arable agroforestry cover 1.1 and 0.3 million ha respectively. Spain (5.6 million ha), France (1.6 million ha), Greece (1.6 million ha), Italy (1.4 million ha), Portugal (1.2 million ha), Romania (0.9 million ha) and Bulgaria (0.9 million ha) have the largest absolute area of agroforestry. However the extent of agroforestry, expressed as a proportion of the utilised agricultural area (UAA), is greatest in countries like Cyprus (40% of UAA), Portugal (32% of UA A) and Greece (31% of UAA). A cluster analysis revealed that a high abundance of agroforestry areas can be found in the south-west quadrat of the Iberian Peninsula, the south of France, Sardinia, south and central Italy, central and north-east Greece, south and central Bulgaria, and central Romania. Since the data were collected and analysed in a uniform manner it is now possible to make comparisons between countries and identify regions in Europe where agroforestry is already widely practiced and areas where there are opportunities for practicing agroforestry on a larger area and introducing novel practices. In addition, with this method it is possible to make more precise estimates on the extent of agroforestry in Europe and changes over time. Because agroforestry covers a considerable part of the agricultural land in the EU, it is crucial that it gets a more prominent and clearer place in EU statistical reporting in order to provide decision makers with more reliable information on the extent and nature of agroforestry. Reliable information, in turn, should help to guide policy development and implementation, and the evaluation of the impact of agricultural and other policies on agroforestry.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {den Herder, M. and Moreno, G. and Mosquera-Losada, R.M. and Palma, J.H.N. and Sidiropoulou, A. and Santiago Freijanes, J.J. and Crous-Duran, J. and Paulo, J.A. and Tomé, M. and Pantera, A. and Papanastasis, V.P. and Mantzanas, K. and Pachana, P. and Papadopoulos, A. and Plieninger, T. and Burgess, P.J.},\n doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005},\n journal = {Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n © 2017 Elsevier B.V. An accurate and objective estimate on the extent of agroforestry in Europe is critical for the development of supporting policies. For this reason, a more harmonised and uniform Pan-European estimate is needed. The aim of this study was to quantify and map the distribution of agroforestry in the European Union. We classified agroforestry into three main types of agroforestry systems: arable agroforestry, livestock agroforestry and high value tree agroforestry. These three classes are partly overlapping as high value tree agroforestry can be part of either arable or livestock agroforestry. Agroforestry areas were mapped using LUCAS Land Use and Land Cover data (Eurostat, 2015). By identifying certain combinations of primary and secondary land cover and/or land management it was possible to identify agroforestry points and stratify them in the three different systems. According to our estimate using the LUCAS database the total area under agroforestry in the EU 27 is about 15.4 million ha which is equivalent to about 3.6% of the territorial area and 8.8% of the utilised agricultural area. Of our three studied systems, livestock agroforestry covers about 15.1 million ha which is by far the largest area. High value tree agroforestry and arable agroforestry cover 1.1 and 0.3 million ha respectively. Spain (5.6 million ha), France (1.6 million ha), Greece (1.6 million ha), Italy (1.4 million ha), Portugal (1.2 million ha), Romania (0.9 million ha) and Bulgaria (0.9 million ha) have the largest absolute area of agroforestry. However the extent of agroforestry, expressed as a proportion of the utilised agricultural area (UAA), is greatest in countries like Cyprus (40% of UAA), Portugal (32% of UA A) and Greece (31% of UAA). A cluster analysis revealed that a high abundance of agroforestry areas can be found in the south-west quadrat of the Iberian Peninsula, the south of France, Sardinia, south and central Italy, central and north-east Greece, south and central Bulgaria, and central Romania. Since the data were collected and analysed in a uniform manner it is now possible to make comparisons between countries and identify regions in Europe where agroforestry is already widely practiced and areas where there are opportunities for practicing agroforestry on a larger area and introducing novel practices. In addition, with this method it is possible to make more precise estimates on the extent of agroforestry in Europe and changes over time. Because agroforestry covers a considerable part of the agricultural land in the EU, it is crucial that it gets a more prominent and clearer place in EU statistical reporting in order to provide decision makers with more reliable information on the extent and nature of agroforestry. Reliable information, in turn, should help to guide policy development and implementation, and the evaluation of the impact of agricultural and other policies on agroforestry.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Clipick – climate change web picker. A tool bridging daily climate needs in process based modelling in forestry and agriculture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Systems, 26(1). 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Clipick – climate change web picker. A tool bridging daily climate needs in process based modelling in forestry and agriculture},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {AGFORWARD,CORDEX,ENSEMBLES,Forest growth,IPCC,Process based modelling},\n volume = {26},\n id = {e6db894f-3cef-380e-91ce-ffa44c11822b},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.913Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.913Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 INIA. Aim of study: Climate data is a need for different types of modeling assessments, especially those involving process based modeling focusing on climate change impacts. However, there is a scarcity of tools delivering easy access to climate datasets to use in biological related modeling. This study aimed at the development of a tool that could provide an user-friendly interface to facilitate access to climate datasets, that are used to supply climate scenarios for the International Panel on Climate Change. Area of study: The tool provides daily datasets across Europe, and also parts of northern Africa Material and Methods: The tool uses climatic datasets generated from third party sources (IPCC related) while a web based interface was developed in JavaScript to ease the access to the datasets Main Results: The interface delivers daily (or monthly) climate data from a user-defined location in Europe for 7 climate variables: minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation, radiation, minimum and maximum relative humidity and wind speed). The time frame ranges from 1951 to 2100, providing the basis to use the data for climate change impact assessments. The tool is free and publicly available at http://www.isa.ulisboa.pt/proj/clipick/. Research Highlights: A new and easy-to-use tool is suggested that will promote the use of climate change scenarios across Europe, especially when daily time steps are needed. CliPick eases the communication between climatic and modelling communities such as agriculture and forestry.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J.H.N.},\n doi = {10.5424/fs/2017261-10251},\n journal = {Forest Systems},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Farmers’ reasoning behind the uptake of agroforestry practices: evidence from multiple case-studies across Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rois-Díaz, M.; Lovric, N.; Lovric, M.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Den Herder, M.; Graves, A.; Palma, J.; Paulo, J.; Pisanelli, A.; Smith, J.; Moreno, G.; García, S.; Varga, A.; Pantera, A.; Mirck, J.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farmers’ reasoning behind the uptake of agroforestry practices: evidence from multiple case-studies across Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Driving forces,Farming,Interviews,Narrative thematic analysis},\n id = {4ffd7612-c5e7-3cf7-bc3b-7b12df095d3d},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.924Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.924Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Potential benefits and costs of agroforestry practices have been analysed by experts, but few studies have captured farmers’ perspectives on why agroforestry might be adopted on a European scale. This study provides answers to this question, through an analysis of 183 farmer interviews in 14 case study systems in eight European countries. The study systems included high natural and cultural value agroforestry systems, silvoarable systems, high value tree systems, and silvopasture systems, as well as systems where no agroforestry practices were occurring. A mixed method approach combining quantitative and qualitative approaches was taken throughout the interviews. Narrative thematic data analysis was performed. Data collection proceeded until no new themes emerged. Within a given case study, i.e. the different systems in different European regions, this sampling was performed both for farmers who practice agroforestry and farmers who did not. Results point to a great diversity of agroforestry practices, although many of the farmers are not aware of the term or concept of agroforestry, despite implementing the practice in their own farms. While only a few farmers mentioned eligibility for direct payments in the CAP as the main reason to remove trees from their land, to avoid the reduction of the funded area, the tradition in the family or the region, learning from others, and increasing the diversification of products play the most important role in adopting or not agroforestry systems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Rois-Díaz, M. and Lovric, N. and Lovric, M. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Den Herder, M. and Graves, A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Paulo, J.A. and Pisanelli, A. and Smith, J. and Moreno, G. and García, S. and Varga, A. and Pantera, A. and Mirck, J. and Burgess, P.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0139-9},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating belowground carbon dynamics into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse agroforestry model.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Crous-Duran, J.; Graves, A.; de Jalon, S.; Upson, M.; Oliveira, T.; Paulo, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Moreno, G.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Integrating belowground carbon dynamics into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse agroforestry model},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Climate change,Ecosystem approach,Leaves,Resilience,Root,RothC,Soil},\n id = {1f8e8f83-75b4-38a1-bf9d-d192e5170741},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.120Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.120Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry combines perennial woody elements (e.g. trees) with an agricultural understory (e.g. wheat, pasture) which can also potentially be used by a livestock component. In recent decades, modern agroforestry systems have been proposed at European level as land use alternatives for conventional agricultural systems. The potential range of benefits that modern agroforestry systems can provide includes farm product diversification (food and timber), soil and biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and the soil. Whilst typically these include benefits such as food and timber provision, potentially, there are benefits in the form of carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and in the soil. Quantifying the effect of agroforestry systems on soil carbon is important because it is one means by which atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in order to reduce global warming. However, experimental systems that can combine the different alternative features of agroforestry systems are difficult to implement and long-term. For this reason, models are needed to explore these alternatives, in order to determine what benefits different combinations of trees and understory might provide in agroforestry systems. This paper describes the integration of the widely used soil carbon model RothC, a model simulating soil organic carbon turnover, into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse model to estimate aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems. The improvement of the Yield-SAFE model focused on the estimation of input plant material into soil (i.e. leaf fall and root mortality) while maintaining the original aspiration for a simple conceptualization of agroforestry modeling, but allowing to feed inputs to a soil carbon module based on RothC. Validation simulations show that the combined model gives predictions consistent with observed data for both SOC dynamics and tree leaf fall. Two case study systems are examined: a cork oak system in South Portugal and a poplar system in the UK, in current and future climate.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J.H.N. and Crous-Duran, J. and Graves, A.R. and de Jalon, S.G. and Upson, M. and Oliveira, T.S. and Paulo, J.A. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Moreno, G. and Burgess, P.J.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0123-4},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n © 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry combines perennial woody elements (e.g. trees) with an agricultural understory (e.g. wheat, pasture) which can also potentially be used by a livestock component. In recent decades, modern agroforestry systems have been proposed at European level as land use alternatives for conventional agricultural systems. The potential range of benefits that modern agroforestry systems can provide includes farm product diversification (food and timber), soil and biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and the soil. Whilst typically these include benefits such as food and timber provision, potentially, there are benefits in the form of carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and in the soil. Quantifying the effect of agroforestry systems on soil carbon is important because it is one means by which atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in order to reduce global warming. However, experimental systems that can combine the different alternative features of agroforestry systems are difficult to implement and long-term. For this reason, models are needed to explore these alternatives, in order to determine what benefits different combinations of trees and understory might provide in agroforestry systems. This paper describes the integration of the widely used soil carbon model RothC, a model simulating soil organic carbon turnover, into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse model to estimate aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems. The improvement of the Yield-SAFE model focused on the estimation of input plant material into soil (i.e. leaf fall and root mortality) while maintaining the original aspiration for a simple conceptualization of agroforestry modeling, but allowing to feed inputs to a soil carbon module based on RothC. Validation simulations show that the combined model gives predictions consistent with observed data for both SOC dynamics and tree leaf fall. Two case study systems are examined: a cork oak system in South Portugal and a poplar system in the UK, in current and future climate.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry systems of high nature and cultural value in Europe: provision of commercial goods and other ecosystem services.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Moreno, G.; Aviron, S.; Berg, S.; Crous-Duran, J.; Franca, A.; de Jalón, S.; Hartel, T.; Mirck, J.; Pantera, A.; Palma, J.; Paulo, J.; Re, G.; Sanna, F.; Thenail, C.; Varga, A.; Viaud, V.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Agroforestry systems of high nature and cultural value in Europe: provision of commercial goods and other ecosystem services},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Biodiversity,Bocage,Cultural services,Dehesa/montado,Parklands,Provisioning services,Regulating services,Wood pastures},\n id = {10aede62-2eef-3fe1-9cf8-3f7d3ead6a72},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.388Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.388Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Land use systems that integrate woody vegetation with livestock and/or crops and are recognised for their biodiversity and cultural importance can be termed high nature and cultural value (HNCV) agroforestry. In this review, based on the literature and stakeholder knowledge, we describe the structure, components and management practices of ten contrasting HNCV agroforestry systems distributed across five European bioclimatic regions. We also compile and categorize the ecosystem services provided by these agroforestry systems, following the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. HNCV agroforestry in Europe generally enhances biodiversity and regulating ecosystem services relative to conventional agriculture and forestry. These systems can reduce fire risk, compared to conventional forestry, and can increase carbon sequestration, moderate the microclimate, and reduce soil erosion and nutrient leaching compared to conventional agriculture. However, some of the evidence is location specific and a better geographical coverage is needed to generalize patterns at broader scales. Although some traditional practices and products have been abandoned, many of the studied systems continue to provide multiple woody and non-woody plant products and high-quality food from livestock and game. Some of the cultural value of these systems can also be captured through tourism and local events. However there remains a continual challenge for farmers, landowners and society to fully translate the positive social and environmental impacts of HNCV agroforestry into market prices for the products and services.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Moreno, G. and Aviron, S. and Berg, S. and Crous-Duran, J. and Franca, A. and de Jalón, S.G. and Hartel, T. and Mirck, J. and Pantera, A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Paulo, J.A. and Re, G.A. and Sanna, F. and Thenail, C. and Varga, A. and Viaud, V. and Burgess, P.J.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0126-1},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A framework for modeling adaptive forest management and decision making under climate change.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Yousefpour, R.; Temperli, C.; Jacobsen, J.; Thorsen, B.; Meilby, H.; Lexer, M.; Lindner, M.; Bugmann, H.; Borges, J.; Palma, J.; Ray, D.; Zimmermann, N.; Delzon, S.; Kremer, A.; Kramer, K.; Reyer, C.; Lasch-Born, P.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; and Hanewinkel, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecology and Society, 22(4). 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A framework for modeling adaptive forest management and decision making under climate change},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Behavioral adaptation,Europe,Forest management,Knowledge management,Mathematical programming,Process-based models,Spatial planning},\n volume = {22},\n id = {35508564-ce18-38b6-9c30-29f90a8adeef},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.666Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.666Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 by the author(s). Adapting the management of forest resources to climate change involves addressing several crucial aspects to provide a valid basis for decision making. These include the knowledge and belief of decision makers, the mapping of management options for the current as well as anticipated future bioclimatic and socioeconomic conditions, and the ways decisions are evaluated and made. We investigate the adaptive management process and develop a framework including these three aspects, thus providing a structured way to analyze the challenges and opportunities of managing forests in the face of climate change. We apply the framework for a range of case studies that differ in the way climate and its impacts are projected to change, the available management options, and how decision makers develop, update, and use their beliefs about climate change scenarios to select among adaptation options, each being optimal for a certain climate change scenario. We describe four stylized types of decision-making processes that differ in how they (1) take into account uncertainty and new information on the state and development of the climate and (2) evaluate alternative management decisions: the “no-change,” the “reactive,” the “trend-adaptive,” and the “forward-looking adaptive” decision-making types. Accordingly, we evaluate the experiences with alternative management strategies and recent publications on using Bayesian optimization methods that account for different simulated learning schemes based on varying knowledge, belief, and information. Finally, our proposed framework for identifying adaptation strategies provides solutions for enhancing forest structure and diversity, biomass and timber production, and reducing climate change-induced damages. They are spatially heterogeneous, reflecting the diversity in growing conditions and socioeconomic settings within Europe.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Yousefpour, R. and Temperli, C. and Jacobsen, J.B. and Thorsen, B.J. and Meilby, H. and Lexer, M.J. and Lindner, M. and Bugmann, H. and Borges, J.G. and Palma, J.H.N. and Ray, D. and Zimmermann, N.E. and Delzon, S. and Kremer, A. and Kramer, K. and Reyer, C.P.O. and Lasch-Born, P. and Garcia-Gonzalo, J. and Hanewinkel, M.},\n doi = {10.5751/ES-09614-220440},\n journal = {Ecology and Society},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n How is agroforestry perceived in Europe? An assessment of positive and negative aspects by stakeholders.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n García de Jalón, S.; Burgess, P.; Graves, A.; Moreno, G.; McAdam, J.; Pottier, E.; Novak, S.; Bondesan, V.; Mosquera-Losada, R.; Crous-Durán, J.; Palma, J.; Paulo, J.; Oliveira, T.; Cirou, E.; Hannachi, Y.; Pantera, A.; Wartelle, R.; Kay, S.; Malignier, N.; van Lerberghe, P.; Tsonkova, P.; Mirck, J.; Rois, M.; Kongsted, A.; Thenail, C.; Luske, B.; Berg, S.; Gosme, M.; and Vityi, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {How is agroforestry perceived in Europe? An assessment of positive and negative aspects by stakeholders},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Adoption,Agroforestry,Barrier,Europe,Opportunity},\n id = {e11e31b3-e1bd-302b-86a7-908cf4b681a2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.675Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.675Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Whilst the benefits of agroforestry are widely recognised in tropical latitudes few studies have assessed how agroforestry is perceived in temperate latitudes. This study evaluates how stakeholders and key actors including farmers, landowners, agricultural advisors, researchers and environmentalists perceive the implementation and expansion of agroforestry in Europe. Meetings were held with 30 stakeholder groups covering different agroforestry systems in 2014 in eleven EU countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). In total 344 valid responses were received to a questionnaire where stakeholders were asked to rank the positive and negative aspects of implementing agroforestry in their region. Improved biodiversity and wildlife habitats, animal health and welfare, and landscape aesthetics were seen as the main positive aspects of agroforestry. By contrast, increased labour, complexity of work, management costs and administrative burden were seen as the most important negative aspects. Overall, improving the environmental value of agriculture was seen as the main benefit of agroforestry, whilst management and socio-economic issues were seen as the greatest barriers. The great variability in the opportunities and barriers of the systems suggests enhanced adoption of agroforestry across Europe will be most likely to occur with specific initiatives for each type of system.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {García de Jalón, S. and Burgess, P.J. and Graves, A. and Moreno, G. and McAdam, J. and Pottier, E. and Novak, S. and Bondesan, V. and Mosquera-Losada, R. and Crous-Durán, J. and Palma, J.H.N. and Paulo, J.A. and Oliveira, T.S. and Cirou, E. and Hannachi, Y. and Pantera, A. and Wartelle, R. and Kay, S. and Malignier, N. and van Lerberghe, P. and Tsonkova, P. and Mirck, J. and Rois, M. and Kongsted, A.G. and Thenail, C. and Luske, B. and Berg, S. and Gosme, M. and Vityi, A.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0116-3},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kay, S.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; García de Jalón, S.; Graves, A.; Moreno, G.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Palma, J.; Roces-Díaz, J.; Santiago-Freijanes, J.; Szerencsits, E.; Weibel, R.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Biodiversity,Biomass production,Carbon sequestration,Erosion,Groundwater recharge,Nitrate leaching,Pollination},\n id = {9d8f60ef-2d24-38bb-b31b-1649da4f7923},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.339Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.339Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry systems are known to provide ecosystem services which differ in quantity and quality from conventional agricultural practices and could enhance rural landscapes. In this study we compared ecosystem services provision of agroforestry and non-agroforestry landscapes in case study regions from three European biogeographical regions: Mediterranean (montado and dehesa), Continental (orchards and wooded pasture) and Atlantic agroforestry systems (chestnut soutos and hedgerows systems). Seven ecosystem service indicators (two provisioning and five regulating services) were mapped, modelled and assessed. Clear variations in amount and provision of ecosystem services were found between different types of agroforestry systems. Nonetheless regulating ecosystems services were improved in all agroforestry landscapes, with reduced nitrate losses, higher carbon sequestration, reduced soil losses, higher functional biodiversity focussed on pollination and greater habitat diversity reflected in a high proportion of semi-natural habitats. The results for provisioning services were inconsistent. While the annual biomass yield and the groundwater recharge rate tended to be higher in agricultural landscapes without agroforestry systems, the total biomass stock was reduced. These broad relationships were observed within and across the case study regions regardless of the agroforestry type or biogeographical region. Overall our study underlines the positive influence of agroforestry systems on the supply of regulating services and their role to enhance landscape structure.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kay, S. and Crous-Duran, J. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and García de Jalón, S. and Graves, A. and Moreno, G. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Palma, J.H.N. and Roces-Díaz, J.V. and Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. and Szerencsits, E. and Weibel, R. and Herzog, F.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0132-3},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating belowground carbon dynamics into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse agroforestry model.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Crous-Duran, J.; Graves, A.; de Jalon, S.; Upson, M.; Oliveira, T.; Paulo, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Moreno, G.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Integrating belowground carbon dynamics into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse agroforestry model},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Climate change,Ecosystem approach,Leaves,Resilience,Root,RothC,Soil},\n id = {60da0d42-c8e1-3b7a-bca5-c152b0d7fb5b},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.003Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.003Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry combines perennial woody elements (e.g. trees) with an agricultural understory (e.g. wheat, pasture) which can also potentially be used by a livestock component. In recent decades, modern agroforestry systems have been proposed at European level as land use alternatives for conventional agricultural systems. The potential range of benefits that modern agroforestry systems can provide includes farm product diversification (food and timber), soil and biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and the soil. Whilst typically these include benefits such as food and timber provision, potentially, there are benefits in the form of carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and in the soil. Quantifying the effect of agroforestry systems on soil carbon is important because it is one means by which atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in order to reduce global warming. However, experimental systems that can combine the different alternative features of agroforestry systems are difficult to implement and long-term. For this reason, models are needed to explore these alternatives, in order to determine what benefits different combinations of trees and understory might provide in agroforestry systems. This paper describes the integration of the widely used soil carbon model RothC, a model simulating soil organic carbon turnover, into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse model to estimate aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems. The improvement of the Yield-SAFE model focused on the estimation of input plant material into soil (i.e. leaf fall and root mortality) while maintaining the original aspiration for a simple conceptualization of agroforestry modeling, but allowing to feed inputs to a soil carbon module based on RothC. Validation simulations show that the combined model gives predictions consistent with observed data for both SOC dynamics and tree leaf fall. Two case study systems are examined: a cork oak system in South Portugal and a poplar system in the UK, in current and future climate.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J.H.N. and Crous-Duran, J. and Graves, A.R. and de Jalon, S.G. and Upson, M. and Oliveira, T.S. and Paulo, J.A. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and Moreno, G. and Burgess, P.J.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0123-4},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n © 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry combines perennial woody elements (e.g. trees) with an agricultural understory (e.g. wheat, pasture) which can also potentially be used by a livestock component. In recent decades, modern agroforestry systems have been proposed at European level as land use alternatives for conventional agricultural systems. The potential range of benefits that modern agroforestry systems can provide includes farm product diversification (food and timber), soil and biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and the soil. Whilst typically these include benefits such as food and timber provision, potentially, there are benefits in the form of carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and in the soil. Quantifying the effect of agroforestry systems on soil carbon is important because it is one means by which atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in order to reduce global warming. However, experimental systems that can combine the different alternative features of agroforestry systems are difficult to implement and long-term. For this reason, models are needed to explore these alternatives, in order to determine what benefits different combinations of trees and understory might provide in agroforestry systems. This paper describes the integration of the widely used soil carbon model RothC, a model simulating soil organic carbon turnover, into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse model to estimate aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems. The improvement of the Yield-SAFE model focused on the estimation of input plant material into soil (i.e. leaf fall and root mortality) while maintaining the original aspiration for a simple conceptualization of agroforestry modeling, but allowing to feed inputs to a soil carbon module based on RothC. Validation simulations show that the combined model gives predictions consistent with observed data for both SOC dynamics and tree leaf fall. Two case study systems are examined: a cork oak system in South Portugal and a poplar system in the UK, in current and future climate.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kay, S.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; García de Jalón, S.; Graves, A.; Moreno, G.; Mosquera-Losada, M.; Palma, J.; Roces-Díaz, J.; Santiago-Freijanes, J.; Szerencsits, E.; Weibel, R.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Biodiversity,Biomass production,Carbon sequestration,Erosion,Groundwater recharge,Nitrate leaching,Pollination},\n id = {5cc02e9c-49a8-3a3d-a513-1be47b36e1b1},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.203Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.203Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Agroforestry systems are known to provide ecosystem services which differ in quantity and quality from conventional agricultural practices and could enhance rural landscapes. In this study we compared ecosystem services provision of agroforestry and non-agroforestry landscapes in case study regions from three European biogeographical regions: Mediterranean (montado and dehesa), Continental (orchards and wooded pasture) and Atlantic agroforestry systems (chestnut soutos and hedgerows systems). Seven ecosystem service indicators (two provisioning and five regulating services) were mapped, modelled and assessed. Clear variations in amount and provision of ecosystem services were found between different types of agroforestry systems. Nonetheless regulating ecosystems services were improved in all agroforestry landscapes, with reduced nitrate losses, higher carbon sequestration, reduced soil losses, higher functional biodiversity focussed on pollination and greater habitat diversity reflected in a high proportion of semi-natural habitats. The results for provisioning services were inconsistent. While the annual biomass yield and the groundwater recharge rate tended to be higher in agricultural landscapes without agroforestry systems, the total biomass stock was reduced. These broad relationships were observed within and across the case study regions regardless of the agroforestry type or biogeographical region. Overall our study underlines the positive influence of agroforestry systems on the supply of regulating services and their role to enhance landscape structure.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kay, S. and Crous-Duran, J. and Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. and García de Jalón, S. and Graves, A. and Moreno, G. and Mosquera-Losada, M.R. and Palma, J.H.N. and Roces-Díaz, J.V. and Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. and Szerencsits, E. and Weibel, R. and Herzog, F.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0132-3},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Reyer, C.; Bathgate, S.; Blennow, K.; Borges, J.; Bugmann, H.; Delzon, S.; Faias, S.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Gardiner, B.; Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.; Gracia, C.; Hernández, J.; Kellomäki, S.; Kramer, K.; Lexer, M.; Lindner, M.; Van Der Maaten, E.; Maroschek, M.; Muys, B.; Nicoll, B.; Palahi, M.; Palma, J.; Paulo, J.; Peltola, H.; Pukkala, T.; Rammer, W.; Ray, D.; Sabaté, S.; Schelhaas, M.; Seidl, R.; Temperli, C.; Tomé, M.; Yousefpour, R.; Zimmermann, N.; and Hanewinkel, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Environmental Research Letters, 12(3). 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Fire,Forest models,Forest productivity-disturbances-climate change in,Insects,Storms,Trade-offs},\n volume = {12},\n id = {0dd79d09-52ba-3e94-8441-b625f2f9e4b1},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.404Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.404Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd. Recent studies projecting future climate change impacts on forests mainly consider either the effects of climate change on productivity or on disturbances. However, productivity and disturbances are intrinsically linked because 1) disturbances directly affect forest productivity (e.g. via a reduction in leaf area, growing stock or resource-use efficiency), and 2) disturbance susceptibility is often coupled to a certain development phase of the forest with productivity determining the time a forest is in this specific phase of susceptibility. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of forest productivity changes in different forest regions in Europe under climate change, and partition these changes into effects induced by climate change alone and by climate change and disturbances. We present projections of climate change impacts on forest productivity from state-of-The-Art forest models that dynamically simulate forest productivity and the effects of the main European disturbance agents (fire, storm, insects), driven by the same climate scenario in seven forest case studies along a large climatic gradient throughout Europe. Our study shows that, in most cases, including disturbances in the simulations exaggerate ongoing productivity declines or cancel out productivity gains in response to climate change. In fewer cases, disturbances also increase productivity or buffer climate-change induced productivity losses, e.g. because low severity fires can alleviate resource competition and increase fertilization. Even though our results cannot simply be extrapolated to other types of forests and disturbances, we argue that it is necessary to interpret climate change-induced productivity and disturbance changes jointly to capture the full range of climate change impacts on forests and to plan adaptation measures.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Reyer, C.P.O. and Bathgate, S. and Blennow, K. and Borges, J.G. and Bugmann, H. and Delzon, S. and Faias, S.P. and Garcia-Gonzalo, J. and Gardiner, B. and Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.R. and Gracia, C. and Hernández, J.G. and Kellomäki, S. and Kramer, K. and Lexer, M.J. and Lindner, M. and Van Der Maaten, E. and Maroschek, M. and Muys, B. and Nicoll, B. and Palahi, M. and Palma, J.H.N. and Paulo, J.A. and Peltola, H. and Pukkala, T. and Rammer, W. and Ray, D. and Sabaté, S. and Schelhaas, M.-J. and Seidl, R. and Temperli, C. and Tomé, M. and Yousefpour, R. and Zimmermann, N.E. and Hanewinkel, M.},\n doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ef1},\n journal = {Environmental Research Letters},\n number = {3}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n García de Jalón, S.; Graves, A.; Palma, J.; Williams, A.; Upson, M.; and Burgess, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n keywords = {Externality,Farm-SAFE,Profitability,Silvoarable,Valuation,Yield-SAFE},\n id = {e8cd340a-f570-3b81-a9d0-6a63fbabc5c6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.644Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.644Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. The use of land for intensive arable production in Europe is associated with a range of externalities that typically impose costs on third parties. The introduction of trees in arable systems can potentially be used to reduce these costs. This paper assesses the profitability and environmental externalities of a silvoarable agroforestry system, and compares this with the profitability and environmental externalities from an arable system and a forestry system. A silvoarable experimental plot of poplar trees planted in 1992 in Bedfordshire, Eastern England, was used as a case study. The Yield-SAFE model was used to simulate the growth and yields of the silvoarable, arable, and forestry land uses along with the associated environmental externalities, including carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrogen and phosphorus surplus, and soil erosion losses by water. The Farm-SAFE model was then used to quantify the monetary value of these effects. The study assesses both the financial profitability from a farmer perspective and the economic benefit from a societal perspective. The arable option was the most financially profitable system followed by the silvoarable system and forestry. However, when the environmental externalities were included, silvoarable agroforestry provided the greatest benefit. This suggests that the appropriate integration of trees in arable land can provide greater well-being benefits to society overall, than arable farming without trees, or forestry systems on their own.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {García de Jalón, S. and Graves, A. and Palma, J.H.N. and Williams, A. and Upson, M. and Burgess, P.J.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-017-0128-z},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2016\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Managing traditional hedges for biofuel.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Chambers, M.; Crossland, M.; Wolton, R.; and Smith\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 12th European International Farming Systems Association Symposium Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways, 2016. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Managing$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Managing$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Managing traditional hedges for biofuel},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2016},\n keywords = {Hedges,biodiversity,woodfuel},\n websites = {www.twecom.eu},\n id = {5f0b4245-ec41-3b2a-9483-f861cd7f9bfc},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:37.396Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:03.177Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {With around 700,000 km, hedges are the most widespread semi-natural habitat in lowland Britain. As well as being an important landscape feature in their own right, hedges fulfil many functions and are increasingly recognised for their importance in regulating environmental processes. However, the 2007 Countryside Survey found that just 68% of Britain's hedges are managed. Recent research has sought to address this by investigating the economic potential of using biomass from hedgerow management for local energy or heat production. This work has brought farm hedges back into focus and sought to answer questions about whether biomass can be sustainably and economically harvested from hedgerows, and as such, whether hedges can be a viable source of woodfuel? Here we outline the results of trials carried out in Southern England to assess the efficiency, cost and viability of coppicing hedges as a local and sustainable source of woodfuel. Machinery and methods were tested at different scales and the impacts on the local environment assessed. Building on work in South West England and Northern France the trials demonstrated that that hedges can be managed effectively and economically to produce woodfuel of reasonable quality which meets industry standards. However, the introduction of coppice management of hedges for woodfuel is likely to have both positive and negative impacts on the wildlife of individual hedges and on biodiversity at a landscape scale. To address this, alongside the trials a protocol was developed to assess the likely impacts on biodiversity of managing hedgerows for woodfuel. The biodiversity protocol enables landowners to carry out an assessment of their resource prior to carrying out any management, it identifies hedges suitable for harvesting woodfuel and those of potentially high biodiversity value as well as those in need of improvement and offers general management recommendations based on different indicators.},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, S and Chambers, M and Crossland, M and Wolton, R and Smith, undefined},\n booktitle = {12th European International Farming Systems Association Symposium Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Policies to encourage trees on farms in the UK and Ireland: comparison of CAP (2014-2020) Pillar I and Pillar II measures.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lawson, G.; Curran, E.; McAdam, J.; Strachan, M.; Pagella, T.; Thomas, T.; and Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Farm Woodland Forum, Annual Meeting, (June). 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Policies$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Policies$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Policies to encourage trees on farms in the UK and Ireland: comparison of CAP (2014-2020) Pillar I and Pillar II measures},\n type = {article},\n year = {2016},\n websites = {https://www.agroforestry.ac.uk/sites/www.agroforestry.ac.uk/files/Policies to encourage trees on farms in the UK and Ireland.pdf},\n id = {c5a0d54e-870a-338b-ae07-4549ba32b6d6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:49.408Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:13.825Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Lawson, Gerry and Curran, Eugene and McAdam, Jim and Strachan, Mike and Pagella, Tim and Thomas, Terry and Smith, Jo},\n journal = {Farm Woodland Forum, Annual Meeting},\n number = {June}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Silvoarable agroforestry : an alternative approach to organic apple production ?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Crossland, M.; and Wolfe, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 12th European International Farming Systems Association Symposium Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways, 2016. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Silvoarable$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Silvoarable agroforestry : an alternative approach to organic apple production ?},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2016},\n id = {04610d49-f40a-39e3-92bb-b17a47674db1},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:50.720Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:15.248Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Crossland, Mary and Wolfe, Martin},\n booktitle = {12th European International Farming Systems Association Symposium Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2015\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 100% Organic Poultry Feed: Can Algae Replace Soybean Expeller in Organic Broiler Diets?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gerrard, C., L.; Smith, J.; Nelder, R.; Bright, A.; Colley, M.; Clements, R.; and Pearce, B., D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Organic Farming, 1(1): 38-45. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"100%$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {100% Organic Poultry Feed: Can Algae Replace Soybean Expeller in Organic Broiler Diets?},\n type = {article},\n year = {2015},\n keywords = {algae,broiler,feed,organic,poultry,soya},\n pages = {38-45},\n volume = {1},\n id = {28bb4497-0cae-3a17-bd16-291941b8216e},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:36.027Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:01.483Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Current EU regulations allow 5% of feed for organic poultry to come from non-organic production. This is due to concerns about a 100% organic diet meeting the requirements for specific amino acids such as methionine. This exception is due to end on 31st December 2017. While this may match consumer expectations, protein sourced from global organic production may have a negative impact on perceptions of organic poultry in other ways. Soybean is a commonly used ingredient in poultry feed but soybean production has negative environmental and social impacts. Consumers may also prefer organic poultry to have been fed on locally produced feed and, indeed, this would be in line with organic principles. Preliminary feasibility feed trials were carried out during a summer and a winter season using organic broilers in the UK to test three 100% organic feeds: a control diet with globally sourced ingredients including soybean expeller, a diet based on locally sourced (i.e. within Europe) organic ingredients, and a diet based on locally sourced organic ingredients and algae (a good source of methionine). The results of the summer feed trial showed that there were no significant differences in broiler weight gains. In the winter feed trial differences were found. There was a significant difference ( P  = 0.034) in weight gain between the local feed (lower weight gain) and the local feed with algae but no significant difference between the control diet with soybean and the two local diets. These preliminary feed trials indicate that there is no significant impact on broiler performance or animal welfare parameters when replacing soybean with European protein sources, possibly including algae, suggesting that, although the research is still at a very early stage, such feeds may be a viable option for 100% organic poultry feed in the future.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Gerrard, Catherine L. and Smith, Jo and Nelder, Rebecca and Bright, Ashleigh and Colley, Mike and Clements, Ruth and Pearce, Bruce D.},\n doi = {10.12924/of2015.01010038},\n journal = {Organic Farming},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Exploring the Feasibility of Using Silage-Based Feed with Alternative Sources of Protein in Organic Pig Rations.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Clements, R., C.; Higham, L., E.; Smith, J.; Gerrard, C., L.; Colley, M., C.; Zaralis, K.; Nelder, R.; Pearce, B.; Rayner, A.; and Bright, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Organic Farming, 1(1): 50-56. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Exploring$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Exploring the Feasibility of Using Silage-Based Feed with Alternative Sources of Protein in Organic Pig Rations},\n type = {article},\n year = {2015},\n keywords = {beans,forage,monogastrics,organic,peas,pigs,roughage,silage,soya,soybean},\n pages = {50-56},\n volume = {1},\n id = {c040ab7d-ca10-366d-883e-7618f3df549e},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:40.761Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:06.171Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Clements, Ruth C. and Higham, Laura E. and Smith, Jo and Gerrard, Catherine L. and Colley, Mike C. and Zaralis, Konstantinos and Nelder, Rebecca and Pearce, Bruce and Rayner, Annie and Bright, Ashleigh},\n doi = {10.12924/of2015.01010050},\n journal = {Organic Farming},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Adaptive management and debarking schedule optimization of Quercus suber L. stands under climate change: case study in Chamusca, Portugal.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Paulo, J.; Faias, S.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Borges, J.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Regional Environmental Change, 15(8). 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Adaptive management and debarking schedule optimization of Quercus suber L. stands under climate change: case study in Chamusca, Portugal},\n type = {article},\n year = {2015},\n keywords = {Adaptive forest management,Cork oak,Ecosystem services,Landscape,Optimization,Region,Regulation},\n volume = {15},\n id = {8ebc7066-0c38-33b5-bd83-4ca8cf003983},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.481Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.481Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Cork oak stands are one of the major sources of income from Portuguese Mediterranean forests. Future climate is projected to increase temperatures, reduce precipitation and decrease current forests’ productivity and therefore, adapting management, is a key strategy to mitigate impacts of future climate on cork supply. The central objective of this research was to compare conventional and adaptive management regimes under scenarios of climate change. The adaptive management focussed on adopting optimal harvest schedules while considering different management objectives. The study focused on the Chamusca region, one of the most productive areas of cork, and considered four distinct spatial scales for analysis. For each scale, the management objective was defined according to field information and considered the maximization of cork production while targeting different cork harvesting flows: (a) more frequent and regular or (b) less frequent and concentrated. A forest growth model was used to simulate climate change impact on future yield of cork oak stands under different forest management alternatives. A mixed integer programming model was developed to find the most adequate cork debarking cycle calendar for cork oak stands. Our results suggest that (1) business as usual management under climate change scenarios could decrease cork supply and carbon stock in the tree component of the forests by up to 20 and 30 %, respectively, (2) the development of adaptive management strategies, including cork extraction schedule optimization, to address climate change has advantages over traditional practices and (3) may contribute further to increase cork production (up to double productivity in mid-long term) while addressing concerns with the regulation of cork extraction flows through the adaptation of debarking periods. The mixed integer programming allowed the spatial visualization of the debarking cycle delay. Furthermore, results underline the relevance of an approach to develop adaptive management strategies that can consider different management goals, with different constraints to address climate change.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J.H.N. and Paulo, J.A. and Faias, S.P. and Garcia-Gonzalo, J. and Borges, J.G. and Tomé, M.},\n doi = {10.1007/s10113-015-0818-x},\n journal = {Regional Environmental Change},\n number = {8}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Cork oak stands are one of the major sources of income from Portuguese Mediterranean forests. Future climate is projected to increase temperatures, reduce precipitation and decrease current forests’ productivity and therefore, adapting management, is a key strategy to mitigate impacts of future climate on cork supply. The central objective of this research was to compare conventional and adaptive management regimes under scenarios of climate change. The adaptive management focussed on adopting optimal harvest schedules while considering different management objectives. The study focused on the Chamusca region, one of the most productive areas of cork, and considered four distinct spatial scales for analysis. For each scale, the management objective was defined according to field information and considered the maximization of cork production while targeting different cork harvesting flows: (a) more frequent and regular or (b) less frequent and concentrated. A forest growth model was used to simulate climate change impact on future yield of cork oak stands under different forest management alternatives. A mixed integer programming model was developed to find the most adequate cork debarking cycle calendar for cork oak stands. Our results suggest that (1) business as usual management under climate change scenarios could decrease cork supply and carbon stock in the tree component of the forests by up to 20 and 30 %, respectively, (2) the development of adaptive management strategies, including cork extraction schedule optimization, to address climate change has advantages over traditional practices and (3) may contribute further to increase cork production (up to double productivity in mid-long term) while addressing concerns with the regulation of cork extraction flows through the adaptation of debarking periods. The mixed integer programming allowed the spatial visualization of the debarking cycle delay. Furthermore, results underline the relevance of an approach to develop adaptive management strategies that can consider different management goals, with different constraints to address climate change.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Paulo, J.; Palma, J., N.; Gomes, A.; Faias, S.; Tomé, J.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New Forests, 46(2): 293-307. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Predicting$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal},\n type = {article},\n year = {2015},\n keywords = {Cork oak,Partial least squares,Potential distribution,Quercus suber L.,Site index,Site quality},\n pages = {293-307},\n volume = {46},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9462-4},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {6cdeba75-ff68-3137-9a70-87691ddb061b},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.828Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.828Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Paulo, JoanaAmaral and Palma, JoãoH N and Gomes, AlbertoAzevedo and Faias, SóniaPacheco and Tomé, José and Tomé, Margarida},\n doi = {10.1007/s11056-014-9462-4},\n journal = {New Forests},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2014\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Delivering food production, biodiversity and other ecosystem services in UK agriculture: Can agroforestry do it all?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Varah, A.; Smith, J.; Jones, H.; and Potts, S., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Agriculture and the Environment X, Delivering Multiple Benefits from our Land: Sustainable Development in Practice, volume 6, pages 99-105, 2014. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Delivering$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Delivering food production, biodiversity and other ecosystem services in UK agriculture: Can agroforestry do it all?},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2014},\n pages = {99-105},\n volume = {6},\n issue = {4},\n id = {1291f143-b64e-3d0e-a415-2e40e2b0b71c},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:35.577Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:01.077Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Varah, Alexa and Smith, Jo and Jones, Hannah and Potts, Simon G.},\n doi = {10.1017/S1355770X01250281},\n booktitle = {Agriculture and the Environment X, Delivering Multiple Benefits from our Land: Sustainable Development in Practice}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Novel feeds for organic dairy chains.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rinne, M.; Dragomir, C.; Kuoppala, K.; Smith, J.; and Yáñez-Ruiz, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Organic Agriculture, 4(4): 275-284. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Novel$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Novel feeds for organic dairy chains},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,By-product,Digestibility,Feed value,Vegetable,Whole crop cereal},\n pages = {275-284},\n volume = {4},\n id = {fd4a42e8-6404-31c4-bec6-36daf98f2d24},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:39.751Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:05.347Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The objective of the current work was to assess various novel and underutilized feeds and thus increase the awareness of various novel feeding solutions to support organic and low-input dairy production. A set of various feeds representing high protein feeds, by-products from distilling, wineries, fruit and vegetable production, whole crop cereals, agroforestry and wood-derived materials were collected from Spain, Romania, UK and Finland and analysed for chemical composition and digestibility. The results can be used to aid in exploiting the potential of different feed resources and in ration formulation, and to demonstrate potential to widen the basis of feed supply on organic and low-input dairy farms. The use of various by-products as animal feeds allows in many cases to add the economic value of them, and may provide an environmentally sound method for disposal of the by-product materials. As organic food and beverage manufacturing increases in volumes, it creates opportunities for organically labelled by-products. This would result in higher value for the manufacturer and provide useful additional feedstuffs to be used in organic animal production.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Rinne, Marketta and Dragomir, Catalin and Kuoppala, Kaisa and Smith, Jo and Yáñez-Ruiz, David},\n doi = {10.1007/s13165-014-0081-3},\n journal = {Organic Agriculture},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 100 % Organic feed for poultry – results of feed trials in the UK.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Gerrard, C.; Nelder, R.; Clements, R.; Pearce, B.; and Zeralis, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In ‘Building Organic Bridges’, at the Organic World Congress 2014,, pages 13-15, 2014. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"100$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {100 % Organic feed for poultry – results of feed trials in the UK},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {algae,broilers,feed trials,poultry,protein},\n pages = {13-15},\n id = {5e6ad270-a03a-336c-9e9d-4eecd9c9847c},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:40.310Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:05.762Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Gerrard, Catherine and Nelder, Rebecca and Clements, Ruth and Pearce, Bruce and Zeralis, Kostantinos},\n booktitle = {‘Building Organic Bridges’, at the Organic World Congress 2014,}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Nutritional and fermentation quality of ensiled willow from an integrated feed and bioenergy agroforestry system in UK.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Kuoppala, K.; Yáñez-Ruiz, D.; Leach, K.; and Rinne, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Tiedote, (30): 1-9. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Nutritional$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Nutritional and fermentation quality of ensiled willow from an integrated feed and bioenergy agroforestry system in UK},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n pages = {1-9},\n id = {8284f3be-92d2-3bf1-a978-96a4b1914e9d},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:54.926Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:19.466Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Agroforestry, the integration of trees and agriculture, is valued as a multifunctional land use approach that balances the production of commodities (food, feed, fuel, fibre etc.) with non-commodity outputs such as environmental protection and cultural and landscape amenities. In this study, the possibilities for fodder production from a short rotation coppice of willow (Salix viminalis) used for wood chips to produce energy were investigated. The nutritional value and ensilability were assessed from first year regrowth of willow harvested on 29 June 2011 at Wakelyns Agroforestry, Suffolk, UK. The willow branches with a stem diameter less than 8 mm were manually harvested from 4 plots in two replicates. From 2 plots, another sample was prepared including leaves only. Both dried raw material and silage samples ensiled in evacuated polyethylene bags were analyzed. The crude protein concentration was relatively high in leaf + stem silage (182 g/kg dry matter (DM)) and even higher in leaf only silage (219 g/kg DM) and the fibre concentration was relatively low. However, the organic matter digestibility determined by in vitro pepsin-cellulase method was low (0.421 for leaf + stem silage and 0.511 for leaf only silage) and it cannot be considered as a suitable feed for lactating dairy cows. However, it might be suitable for other animal groups with lower energy requirements. The appearance and smell of the silage samples at opening of the vacuum plastic bags was rather pleasant with minor deteriorations (probably yeasts) visible. The extent of fermentation was low and pH high (5.79) for a rather low DM material (DM concentration 276 g/kg). The water soluble carbohydrates of the raw material (35 g/kg DM) and the residual water soluble carbohydrate concentration in silages was relatively low, which at least partly explains the restricted production of fermentation acids. The fermentation profile was heterofermentative (acetic acid dominated instead of lactic acid). The concentrations of total condensed tannins fractions were almost twice as high in the leaf only silage compared to leaf + stem silage. Although the feed values of willow were low, it may have a role in multifunctional systems, where it can provide additional values in grazing situations such as self-medication and microclimate benefits. For easy and efficient use in animal production, controlled browsing might be used; otherwise methods for harvesting and preservation need to be developed. There seems to be some scope for ensiling willow material. This work is part of an EU FP7 funded project “Sustainable organic and low input dairying” (SOLID, KBBE.2010.1.2-02). For more information on the project, see www.solidairy.eu},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Kuoppala, Kaisa and Yáñez-Ruiz, David and Leach, Katharine and Rinne, Marketta},\n doi = {10.33354/smst.75342},\n journal = {Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Tiedote},\n number = {30}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Agroforestry, the integration of trees and agriculture, is valued as a multifunctional land use approach that balances the production of commodities (food, feed, fuel, fibre etc.) with non-commodity outputs such as environmental protection and cultural and landscape amenities. In this study, the possibilities for fodder production from a short rotation coppice of willow (Salix viminalis) used for wood chips to produce energy were investigated. The nutritional value and ensilability were assessed from first year regrowth of willow harvested on 29 June 2011 at Wakelyns Agroforestry, Suffolk, UK. The willow branches with a stem diameter less than 8 mm were manually harvested from 4 plots in two replicates. From 2 plots, another sample was prepared including leaves only. Both dried raw material and silage samples ensiled in evacuated polyethylene bags were analyzed. The crude protein concentration was relatively high in leaf + stem silage (182 g/kg dry matter (DM)) and even higher in leaf only silage (219 g/kg DM) and the fibre concentration was relatively low. However, the organic matter digestibility determined by in vitro pepsin-cellulase method was low (0.421 for leaf + stem silage and 0.511 for leaf only silage) and it cannot be considered as a suitable feed for lactating dairy cows. However, it might be suitable for other animal groups with lower energy requirements. The appearance and smell of the silage samples at opening of the vacuum plastic bags was rather pleasant with minor deteriorations (probably yeasts) visible. The extent of fermentation was low and pH high (5.79) for a rather low DM material (DM concentration 276 g/kg). The water soluble carbohydrates of the raw material (35 g/kg DM) and the residual water soluble carbohydrate concentration in silages was relatively low, which at least partly explains the restricted production of fermentation acids. The fermentation profile was heterofermentative (acetic acid dominated instead of lactic acid). The concentrations of total condensed tannins fractions were almost twice as high in the leaf only silage compared to leaf + stem silage. Although the feed values of willow were low, it may have a role in multifunctional systems, where it can provide additional values in grazing situations such as self-medication and microclimate benefits. For easy and efficient use in animal production, controlled browsing might be used; otherwise methods for harvesting and preservation need to be developed. There seems to be some scope for ensiling willow material. This work is part of an EU FP7 funded project “Sustainable organic and low input dairying” (SOLID, KBBE.2010.1.2-02). For more information on the project, see www.solidairy.eu\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A web-based ToolBox approach to support adaptive forest management under climate change.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rammer, W.; Schauflinger, C.; Vacik, H.; Palma, J., H., N.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Borges, J., G.; and Lexer, M., J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29: 96-107. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A web-based ToolBox approach to support adaptive forest management under climate change},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {decision support systems,decision-support,knowledge transfer,model,multi-criteria analysis,optimization,systems,vulnerability},\n pages = {96-107},\n volume = {29},\n id = {a4018ea9-a887-3590-94b0-fcfa63c5c16f},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.833Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.833Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {Suppl. 1 Sp. Iss. SI<br/>Au1if<br/>Times Cited:0<br/>Cited References Count:31},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The design and implementation of the adaptive forest management (AFM) ToolBox is presented. Design principles derived from previous experiences in decision support system (DSS) development include support for (1) modularity, (2) accessibility via the Internet, (3) inclusion of different types of knowledge and information, (4) the use of different data sources, and (5) specific problem types. As major components of the AFM ToolBox DataBase, Vulnerability Assessment Tools (single user version, group mode) and an optimization tool to generate optimized management plans at the level of management units or landscapes are highlighted. A key feature is the distinction of two archetypical user profiles (manager, analyst). The AFM ToolBox is evaluated against eight criteria for the assessment of DSS. It is concluded that the ToolBox approach setting focus on modularity while avoiding to over-emphasis technical integration provides the right frame to secure the flexibility regarding tools and decision-making processes which is mandatory if a DSS should be taken up by practice.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Rammer, W and Schauflinger, C and Vacik, H and Palma, J H N and Garcia-Gonzalo, J and Borges, J G and Lexer, M J},\n doi = {Doi 10.1080/02827581.2013.851277},\n journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A decision support system for management planning of Eucalyptus plantations facing climate change.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Borges, J., G.; Palma, J., H., N.; and Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Annals of Forest Science, 71(2): 187-199. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A decision support system for management planning of Eucalyptus plantations facing climate change},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {change impacts,climate change,decision support system,eucalypt,forest ecosystem management,forestry,management planning,models,portugal,productivity},\n pages = {187-199},\n volume = {71},\n id = {0bf7046c-02b4-3435-a0f8-c545e579f5a2},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.632Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.632Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {Sp. Iss. SI<br/>Ab3rc<br/>Times Cited:1<br/>Cited References Count:35},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Climate change studies in Portugal point to warming winters and increase in the dry season length, impacting growth of plants. New tools are needed to increase the effectiveness of forest management planning under climate change. To develop research tools that may help forest managers cope with climate change challenges to long-term planning. These tools should help assess the impact of climate change on the timing and location of forest management options as well as on forest products flows. The proposed tools are based on information system architecture approaches that suggested a "Decision Support System" (DSS) with a modular structure to integrate (1) a management information module; (2) a prescription generator module that integrates a process-based model (Glob3PG); (3) a decision module; (4) a solution report module. To demonstrate the usefulness of the DSS, a eucalyptus forest with 1,722 stands (6,138 ha) in Portugal was considered. Two climate scenarios were used. Potential wood supply decreased from 2.35 to 2.19 million m(3), land value depreciated from 81.1 to 74.7 million Euro and total carbon stock decreased from 228 to 212 tons. The DSS demonstrated that the design of optimal management plans should take into account climate change.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Garcia-Gonzalo, J and Borges, J G and Palma, J H N and Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A},\n doi = {DOI 10.1007/s13595-013-0337-1},\n journal = {Annals of Forest Science},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Innovative agroecosystem goods and services: key profitability drivers in Swiss agroforestry.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sereke, F.; Graves, A.; Dux, D.; Palma, J., N.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agronomy for Sustainable Development,1-12. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Innovative$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Innovative agroecosystem goods and services: key profitability drivers in Swiss agroforestry},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Agroenvironmental policy,Ecosystem services,Participatory research},\n pages = {1-12},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0261-2},\n publisher = {Springer Paris},\n id = {77d5bc90-3366-3130-b242-bfe690062622},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.738Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.738Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Sereke, Firesenai and Graves, AnilR and Dux, Dunja and Palma, JoaoH N and Herzog, Felix},\n doi = {10.1007/s13593-014-0261-2},\n journal = {Agronomy for Sustainable Development}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Paulo, J.; Palma, J., N.; Gomes, A.; Faias, S.; Tomé, J.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New Forests,1-15. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Predicting$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Cork oak,Partial least squares,Potential distribution,Quercus suber L.,Site index,Site quality},\n pages = {1-15},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9462-4},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {4c01e0f6-3a72-325d-bfc6-2e7495210fa8},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.268Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.268Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Paulo, JoanaAmaral and Palma, JoãoH N and Gomes, AlbertoAzevedo and Faias, SóniaPacheco and Tomé, José and Tomé, Margarida},\n doi = {10.1007/s11056-014-9462-4},\n journal = {New Forests}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Carbon sequestration of modern Quercus suber L. silvoarable agroforestry systems in Portugal: a YieldSAFE-based estimation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., H., N.; Paulo, J., A.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 88(5): 791-801. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Carbon$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Carbon sequestration of modern Quercus suber L. silvoarable agroforestry systems in Portugal: a YieldSAFE-based estimation},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Agricultural land,Alley cropping,Dehesa,Land use change,Modeling,Montado},\n pages = {791-801},\n volume = {88},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9725-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {80f7ad08-a4ad-3c62-b2cc-998c9d6807f9},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.541Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.541Z},\n read = {true},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J H N and Paulo, J A and Tomé, M},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-014-9725-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {5}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Yao, R., T.; Scarpa, R.; Turner, J., A.; Barnard, T., D.; Rose, J., M.; Palma, J., H., N.; and Harrison, D., R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Economics, 98: 90-101. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Biodiversity,Discrete choice experiment,Ordinary least squares panel regression,Planted forests,Random parameters logit,Willingness,choice experiment approach,contingent valuation method,directional heterogeneity,environmental valuation,falcons falco-novaeseelandiae,landscape improvements,mixed logit,nest-site,nonmarket valuation,plantation forests,rural,selection,to pay},\n pages = {90-101},\n volume = {98},\n id = {0f572027-9027-3418-88e7-aca3fa1548e4},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.043Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.043Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {ISI Document Delivery No.: AC1NS<br/>Times Cited: 0<br/>Cited Reference Count: 113<br/>Yao, Richard T. Scarpa, Riccardo Turner, James A. Barnard, Tim D. Rose, John M. Palma, Joao H. N. Harrison, Duncan R.<br/>Scion and Future Forest Research<br/>We would like to thank the staff members of Scion, forest companies, conservation organisations, focus group participants and forest ecologists who helped in the development and implementation of this research; Ruth Falshaw for editorial assistance; and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also extend our appreciation to the survey respondents for taking the time to participate in the economic valuation survey. This research was made possible by funding provided by Scion and Future Forest Research.<br/>Elsevier science bv<br/>Amsterdam},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Planted forests are increasingly recognised for the provision of habitats for species threatened with extinction. Despite this development, a limited number of empirical studies have been undertaken to estimate the economic value of this ecosystem service. New Zealand's planted forests provide habitat to at least 118 threatened species. These forests can be managed to increase the abundance of many of these species. We present findings from survey data obtained in a discrete choice experiment designed to estimate the non-market values for a proposed biodiversity enhancement programme in New Zealand's planted forests. We used a two-stage modelling process. First we estimated the individual specific willingness to pay values and then we explored their socio-economic and spatial determinants. The first stage modelling process, which used a random parameters logit model with error components, suggested that willingness to pay was higher for increasing the abundance of native bird than for non-bird species. The second stage model used a least squares panel random-effects regression. Results from this method suggested that socioeconomic characteristics, such as attitudes toward the programme and distance from large planted forests, influenced willingness to pay for biodiversity enhancement. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Yao, R T and Scarpa, R and Turner, J A and Barnard, T D and Rose, J M and Palma, J H N and Harrison, D R},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.009},\n journal = {Ecological Economics}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2013\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: Is temperate agroforestry the answer?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Pearce, B., D.; and Wolfe, M., S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28(1): 80-92. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Reconciling$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: Is temperate agroforestry the answer?},\n type = {article},\n year = {2013},\n keywords = {carbon sequestration,ecosystem services,silvoarable,silvopastoral,sustainability,trees},\n pages = {80-92},\n volume = {28},\n id = {363447c2-3dc6-3c8e-96a9-a6d6ef137583},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:39.090Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:04.856Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Meeting the needs for a growing world population calls for multifunctional land use, which can meet the multiple demands of food and fuel production, environmental and biodiversity protection, and has the capacity for adaptation or resilience to climate change. Agroforestry, a land-use system that integrates trees and shrubs with crops and/or livestock production, has been identified by the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) as a 'win-win' approach that balances the production of commodities (food, feed, fuel, fiber, etc.) with non-commodity outputs such as environmental protection and cultural and landscape amenities. Evidence is now coming to light that supports the promotion of agroforestry in temperate developed countries as a sustainable alternative to the highly industrialized agricultural model with its associated negative environmental externalities. This paper reviews this evidence within the 'ecosystem services' framework to evaluate agroforestry as part of a multifunctional working landscape in temperate regions. Establishing trees on agricultural land can help to mitigate many of the negative impacts of agriculture, for example by regulating soil, water and air quality, supporting biodiversity, reducing inputs by natural regulation of pests and more efficient nutrient cycling, and by modifying local and global climates. The challenge now lies in promoting the adoption of agroforestry as a mainstream land use through research, dissemination of information and policy changes. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Pearce, Bruce D. and Wolfe, Martin S.},\n doi = {10.1017/S1742170511000585},\n journal = {Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Can agroforestry deliver production and environmental benefits in the next Rural Development Programme?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Westaway, S.; Pearce, B., D.; Lampkin, N.; and Briggs, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Can$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Can agroforestry deliver production and environmental benefits in the next Rural Development Programme?},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2013},\n id = {021cc6e8-ca9c-3adb-988c-a251b03bd81e},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:47.023Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:11.632Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Smith, J and Westaway, S and Pearce, Bruce D and Lampkin, Nic and Briggs, S}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hedges : an ecological approach to biofuel production.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Westaway, S.; Wolton, R.; Smith, J.; and Wolfe, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Rethinking Agricultural Systems in the UK, pages 89-96, 2013. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Hedges$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Hedges : an ecological approach to biofuel production},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2013},\n keywords = {agroforestry,biomass,coppice,energy production,hedge,woodfuel},\n pages = {89-96},\n issue = {121},\n id = {9e34de66-369e-39f6-b477-76b7b0c8e868},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:47.520Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:12.097Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Westaway, Sally and Wolton, Rob and Smith, Jo and Wolfe, Martin},\n booktitle = {Rethinking Agricultural Systems in the UK}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Enhanced biodiversity and pollination in UK agroforestry systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Varah, A.; Jones, H.; Smith, J.; and Potts, S., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(9): 2073-2075. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Enhanced$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Enhanced biodiversity and pollination in UK agroforestry systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2013},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Biodiversity,Ecosystem services,Pollination},\n pages = {2073-2075},\n volume = {93},\n id = {960cf2e0-9475-398a-8767-3b9b31124993},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:50.301Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:14.632Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Monoculture farming systems have had serious environmental impacts such as loss of biodiversity and pollinator decline. The authors explain how temperate agroforestry systems show potential in being able to deliver multiple environmental benefits. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Varah, Alexa and Jones, Hannah and Smith, Jo and Potts, Simon G.},\n doi = {10.1002/jsfa.6148},\n journal = {Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture},\n number = {9}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A decision support system for a multi stakeholder's decision process in a Portuguese National Forest.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; Palma, J., H., N.; Freire, J., P., A.; Tome, M.; Mateus, R.; Rodriguez, L., C., E.; Bushenkov, V.; and Borges, J., G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Systems, 22(2): 359-373. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A decision support system for a multi stakeholder's decision process in a Portuguese National Forest},\n type = {article},\n year = {2013},\n keywords = {decision support system,linear programming,management,mixed integer goal programming,participatory planning,sustainable forest management,tools},\n pages = {359-373},\n volume = {22},\n id = {91dbac1e-6b23-3452-9e8f-b2128ca9fe3e},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.452Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.452Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {198NQ<br/>Times Cited:1<br/>Cited References Count:31},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Aim of study: In this paper, we present a decision support system (DSS) to support decision making where different stakeholders have to generate landscape and forest level strategic plans. We further present an interactive approach that may take advantage of a posteriori preference modelling (i.e. Pareto frontier technique) to facilitate the specification of the levels of achievement of various objectives. Area of study: The approach was applied to one planning cycle of a real world study case, the Leiria National Forest in Portugal. The Leiria National Forest, a managed area of approximately eleven thousand hectares in which 8,679 hectares are even aged stands of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) aimed at the production of wood. Material and methods: The interactive approach, at first, tries to generate Pareto efficient frontiers for different objectives. Then, multiple decision makers are involved in the process to seek an agreement towards the definition of a consensual strategic plan. Main results: The system developed in this article integrates an information management subsystem, a module to generate alternative management regimes, growth model routines and a decision module that generates and solves mathematical formulations. It also provides a module to display reports and view the resulting solutions (management plans). We also build the Pareto frontier for different criteria. The results show that the proposed DSS can help solve strategic planning problems subject to sustainable management constraints where people organize themselves and participate jointly to manage their natural resources. Research highlights: The interactive approach facilitates the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the decision making process.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Garcia-Gonzalo, J and Palma, J H N and Freire, J P A and Tome, M and Mateus, R and Rodriguez, L C E and Bushenkov, V and Borges, J G},\n doi = {DOI 10.5424/fs/2013222-03793},\n journal = {Forest Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2012\n \n \n (9)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A European perspective for developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Pearce, B., D.; and Wolfe, M., S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 27(4): 323-332. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A European perspective for developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification},\n type = {article},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {agroecology,ecosystem services,food security,orchards,pollarding},\n pages = {323-332},\n volume = {27},\n id = {953469b2-2b97-304c-b606-51dcbe529788},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:38.619Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:04.411Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {One of the key questions of primary importance to global agriculture and food security is how to optimize sustainable intensification to balance competing demands on land for food and energy production, while ensuring the provision of ecosystem services and maintaining or increasing yields. Integrating trees and agriculture through agroforestry has been attracting increasing interest as an agroecological approach to sustainable intensification. Trees have traditionally been important elements of temperate agricultural systems around the world, but there has been increasing separation of agriculture, forestry and nature over the past few decades. This paper discusses what we can learn from traditional agroforestry systems to help develop modern systems that integrate ecological farming and agroecological advances to achieve sustainable intensification. We also discuss the existing barriers to wider adoption of agroforestry, and identify how these barriers can be overcome to promote agroforestry as a mainstream land-use system. © Cambridge University Press 2011.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Pearce, Bruce D. and Wolfe, Martin S.},\n doi = {10.1017/S1742170511000597},\n journal = {Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n 100% local and organic: closing the protein gap for poultry in the ICOPP Project.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nelder, R.; Smith, J.; Clements, R.; and Pearce, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Tackling the Future Challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry, volume 362, pages 398-400, 2012. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"100%$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {100% local and organic: closing the protein gap for poultry in the ICOPP Project},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {algae,broiler,feed,poultry},\n pages = {398-400},\n volume = {362},\n id = {bbc5644e-62c9-370f-8ab5-4240693434f6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:41.242Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:06.569Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {A key challenge in improving the sustainability of organic poultry production is meeting the required levels of nutrients from locally sourced organic feeds. 100% organic diets for monogastrics will become compulsory in the EU from 1st January 2015. The ICOPP project brings together knowledge, from 10 EU countries, of local feeds for monogastrics and their wider impact on growth, health and welfare and the environment to identify feeding strategies which comply with organic principles. This poster will report on feeding trials carried out with broilers in the UK by FAI and ORC to investigate the impact of algae, peas and lupins on broiler performance and welfare.},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Nelder, Rebecca and Smith, Jo and Clements, Ruth and Pearce, Bruce},\n booktitle = {Tackling the Future Challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating willow-based bioenergy and organic dairy production-the role of tree fodder for feed supplementation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Leach, K.; Rinne, M.; Kuoppala, K.; and Padel, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Tackling the Future Challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry, volume 362, pages 394-397, 2012. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Integrating$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Integrating$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Integrating willow-based bioenergy and organic dairy production-the role of tree fodder for feed supplementation},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {agro-forestry,short rotation coppice,silvopastoral},\n pages = {394-397},\n volume = {362},\n issue = {362},\n websites = {http://orgprints.org/21758/1/Smith_2OAHC proceedings_2012.pdf},\n id = {66d1fa7f-1bd0-3092-ae4c-1b7fc2dda4f1},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:42.208Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:07.459Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Silvopastoral systems that combine livestock and trees offer two main advantages for the animals. First, trees modify microclimatic conditions which can have beneficial effects on pasture growth and animal welfare. Second, trees also provide alternative feed resources during periods of low forage availability. This paper reports on research carried out within the Sustainable Organic and Low Input Dairying (SOLID) project to investigate the multifunctional potential of a novel integrated willow-based bio-energy/organic dairy production system in the UK, especially the role of tree fodder for feed supplementation in organic dairy systems. The nutritional value of two ages (1st and 2nd year re-growth) of short rotation coppiced willow was assessed in two seasons (late spring and late summer) in 2011.},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Smith, J. and Leach, K. and Rinne, M. and Kuoppala, K. and Padel, S},\n booktitle = {Tackling the Future Challenges of Organic Animal Husbandry}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Döring, T.; Pearce, B.; and Wolfe, M., S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Agriculture and the Environment IX, Valuing Ecosystems: Policy, Economic and Management Interactions, volume 6, pages 503-531, 2012. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Developing$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2012},\n pages = {503-531},\n volume = {6},\n issue = {4},\n id = {358b6c1d-ee84-3a3f-b357-51172540faba},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:43.763Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:08.716Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Döring, Thomas and Pearce, Bruce and Wolfe, Martin S.},\n doi = {10.1017/S1355770X01250281},\n booktitle = {Agriculture and the Environment IX, Valuing Ecosystems: Policy, Economic and Management Interactions}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Contribution of cork oak plantations installed after 1990 in Portugal to the Kyoto commitments and to the landowners economy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Coelho, M., B.; Paulo, J., A.; Palma, J., H., N.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Policy and Economics, 17(0): 59-68. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Contribution$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Contribution of cork oak plantations installed after 1990 in Portugal to the Kyoto commitments and to the landowners economy},\n type = {article},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {Carbon sequestration,Cork oak,Kyoto protocol,New plantations area,Wood},\n pages = {59-68},\n volume = {17},\n websites = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111001845},\n id = {6bb5cf1b-f57c-39ba-868f-76b5b75c14c5},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.700Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.700Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Cork oak stands are a part of the agroforestry ecosystem in Portugal, characterized by a low crown cover from cork oak trees, managed towards cork production, and sometimes in combination with grazing. In recent years, European Union policies gave impetus to a large area of new cork oak plantations, which have been established mainly for cork production purposes, and consequently with higher stand density than traditional agroforestry systems. These plantations are important not only for cork production but also for the carbon sequestered by these slow growing forests that won't be harvested for wood production. Thinning operations will be needed to avoid excessive inter-tree competition and wood extracted from these thinning may also provide income for the owners. In the present study, carbon sequestered and wood volumes resulting from thinning were estimated for the next 70 years. Three scenarios of different annual afforestation rates and different site indexes were tested. The resulting values for the considered scenarios show that, if the plantation rates are maintained, new cork oak plantations will have an important contribution to the Portuguese commitments to providing CO2 offsets under the Kyoto protocol. Additionally, due to the increasing values of initial density in new cork plantations, cork oak forests will produce a significant volume of wood that may become an important contribution to the landowners' income.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Coelho, Marta Baptista and Paulo, Joana Amaral and Palma, João Henrique Nunes and Tomé, Margarida},\n doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.005},\n journal = {Forest Policy and Economics},\n number = {0}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating a Eucalyptus fastigata carbon yield calculator in WEFES, a web explorer of forest environmental services.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., N., H.; and Meason, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In International Conference on Tackling climate change: the contribution of forest scientific knowledge, 21 - 24 May, pages 326, 2012. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Integrating$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{\n title = {Integrating a Eucalyptus fastigata carbon yield calculator in WEFES, a web explorer of forest environmental services},\n type = {inproceedings},\n year = {2012},\n pages = {326},\n websites = {http://www.gip-ecofor.org/doc/drupal/tours2012/Book-Tours2012_VF.pdf},\n city = {Tours, France},\n id = {0170c9a0-a14e-3fb0-b75d-b173f7434be3},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.824Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.824Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Conference Proceedings},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inproceedings},\n author = {Palma, J N H and Meason, D},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Tackling climate change: the contribution of forest scientific knowledge, 21 - 24 May}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Resource communication. sIMfLOR - platform for portuguese forest simulators.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Faias, S., P.; Palma, J., H., N.; Barreiro, S.; Paulo, J., A.; and Tome, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Systems, 21(3): 543-548. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Resource communication. sIMfLOR - platform for portuguese forest simulators},\n type = {article},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {biomass,forest management alternatives,forest models,globulus,growth,models,simplot,simyt,suber,tool},\n pages = {543-548},\n volume = {21},\n id = {954d101f-19a9-39d7-a12a-6d63748b79d6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.679Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.679Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {056EM<br/>Times Cited:1<br/>Cited References Count:24},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {In the last decades there has been an increasing number of forest models developed for the main species of the Portuguese forest. Forest models support management decisions by predicting long term stand development under alternative scenarios and taking into account all the components of the ecosystem. However, in most cases, there is a gap between the models developed and their application by decision-makers. The platform for Portuguese Forest Simulators (sIMfLOR) tries to overcome this gap integrating a wide variety of forest models into simulators and providing a baseline tool for forest managers in Portugal. As an integrated modular platform, sIMfLOR makes available forest simulators for the Portuguese forest with user-friendly interfaces to facilitate the introduction of the information for the simulators. The platform displays stand and regional simulators, interfaces to generate required inputs and also auxiliary tools. As the platform focus on end-users, it allows visualization of the simulators outputs in default graphics which can easily be edited by users. The sIMfLOR platform can be permanently accessed at http://www.isa.utl.pt/cef/forchange/fctools.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Faias, S P and Palma, J H N and Barreiro, S and Paulo, J A and Tome, M},\n doi = {DOI 10.5424/fs/2012213-02951},\n journal = {Forest Systems},\n number = {3}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Contribution of cork oak plantations installed after 1990 in Portugal to the Kyoto commitments and to the landowners economy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Coelho, M., B.; Paulo, J., A.; Palma, J., H., N.; and Tomé, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Forest Policy and Economics, 17(0): 59-68. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Contribution$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Contribution of cork oak plantations installed after 1990 in Portugal to the Kyoto commitments and to the landowners economy},\n type = {article},\n year = {2012},\n keywords = {Carbon sequestration,Cork oak,Kyoto protocol,New plantations area,Wood},\n pages = {59-68},\n volume = {17},\n websites = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111001845},\n id = {4341c223-dfb0-35fe-91f9-953ea00ce3cc},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.701Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.701Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Cork oak stands are a part of the agroforestry ecosystem in Portugal, characterized by a low crown cover from cork oak trees, managed towards cork production, and sometimes in combination with grazing. In recent years, European Union policies gave impetus to a large area of new cork oak plantations, which have been established mainly for cork production purposes, and consequently with higher stand density than traditional agroforestry systems. These plantations are important not only for cork production but also for the carbon sequestered by these slow growing forests that won't be harvested for wood production. Thinning operations will be needed to avoid excessive inter-tree competition and wood extracted from these thinning may also provide income for the owners. In the present study, carbon sequestered and wood volumes resulting from thinning were estimated for the next 70 years. Three scenarios of different annual afforestation rates and different site indexes were tested. The resulting values for the considered scenarios show that, if the plantation rates are maintained, new cork oak plantations will have an important contribution to the Portuguese commitments to providing CO2 offsets under the Kyoto protocol. Additionally, due to the increasing values of initial density in new cork plantations, cork oak forests will produce a significant volume of wood that may become an important contribution to the landowners' income.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Coelho, Marta Baptista and Paulo, Joana Amaral and Palma, João Henrique Nunes and Tomé, Margarida},\n doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.005},\n journal = {Forest Policy and Economics},\n number = {0}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Development of a Web Based Explorer for Forest Ecosystem Services (WEFES).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., H., N.; Hock, B.; Palmer, D.; and Payn, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Development$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{\n title = {Development of a Web Based Explorer for Forest Ecosystem Services (WEFES)},\n type = {misc},\n year = {2012},\n source = {International Conference on Tackling climate change: the contribution of forest scientific knowledge, 21 - 24 May},\n pages = {278},\n websites = {http://home.isa.utl.pt/~joaopalma/projects/tranzfor/wefes/},\n city = {Tours, France},\n id = {4b2ce589-e1a7-397c-98f0-ab7d4f35bcec},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.342Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.342Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Web Page},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {misc},\n author = {Palma, J H N and Hock, B and Palmer, D and Payn, T}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2011\n \n \n (7)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Organic Farming and Biodiversity: A review of the literature.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Wolfe, M.; Woodward, L.; Pearce, B.; Lampkin, N.; and Marshall, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Organic$ Paper\n \n \n \n $\"Organic$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Organic Farming and Biodiversity: A review of the literature},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2011},\n issue = {February},\n websites = {http://www.organiccentrewales.org.uk/uploads/biodiversity_review_2011.pdf},\n id = {33e33512-d1e9-3631-aed9-fbf042e95868},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:51.151Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:15.740Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Wolfe, Martin and Woodward, Lawrence and Pearce, Bruce and Lampkin, Nic and Marshall, Hamstead}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J., P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 81(2): 93-108. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Farm-SAFE:$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Economic analysis,Economic model,Equivalent annual value,Net present value},\n pages = {93-108},\n volume = {81},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {841dc239-3a57-38fc-8432-cf8f8a00eb72},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.415Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:14:20.415Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Liagre, F and Terreaux, J P and Borrel, T and Dupraz, C and Palma, J and Herzog, F},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A system identification approach for developing and parameterising an agroforestry system model under constrained availability of data.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Keesman, K., J.; Graves, A.; van der Werf, W.; Burgess, P., J.; Palma, J.; Dupraz, C.; and van Keulen, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12): 1540-1553. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A system identification approach for developing and parameterising an agroforestry system model under constrained availability of data},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Agroforestry,Calibration,Constrained parameter optimization,Model adaptation,Real-world agroforestry experiment,Validation},\n pages = {1540-1553},\n volume = {26},\n websites = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815211001812},\n id = {1f513941-6361-321a-93b7-10e859b41581},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.977Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:26.977Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n notes = {doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.020},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Keesman, Karel J and Graves, Anil and van der Werf, Wopke and Burgess, Paul J and Palma, Joao and Dupraz, Christian and van Keulen, Herman},\n journal = {Environmental Modelling & Software},\n number = {12}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J., P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 81(2): 93-108. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Farm-SAFE:$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Economic analysis,Economic model,Equivalent annual value,Net present value},\n pages = {93-108},\n volume = {81},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {c06a97ae-eb69-34a8-9675-97ec4dd593d3},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.085Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.085Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Liagre, F and Terreaux, J P and Borrel, T and Dupraz, C and Palma, J and Herzog, F},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J., P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 81(2): 93-108. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Farm-SAFE:$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Economic analysis,Economic model,Equivalent annual value,Net present value},\n pages = {93-108},\n volume = {81},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {9233f7eb-a306-317c-b1cc-3591a92aee73},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.416Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.416Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Liagre, F and Terreaux, J P and Borrel, T and Dupraz, C and Palma, J and Herzog, F},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J., P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 81(2): 93-108. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Farm-SAFE:$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Economic analysis,Economic model,Equivalent annual value,Net present value},\n pages = {93-108},\n volume = {81},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {d8632234-41b0-3e4d-a6f6-6da94a10a568},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.732Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.732Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Liagre, F and Terreaux, J P and Borrel, T and Dupraz, C and Palma, J and Herzog, F},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J., P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agroforestry Systems, 81(2): 93-108. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Farm-SAFE:$ Website\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics},\n type = {article},\n year = {2011},\n keywords = {Cost-benefit analysis,Economic analysis,Economic model,Equivalent annual value,Net present value},\n pages = {93-108},\n volume = {81},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n publisher = {Springer Netherlands},\n id = {39a8faea-98ef-3c4b-8427-768305ce2027},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.876Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.876Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Liagre, F and Terreaux, J P and Borrel, T and Dupraz, C and Palma, J and Herzog, F},\n doi = {10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2},\n journal = {Agroforestry Systems},\n number = {2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2010\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agroforestry Policy Review.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agroforestry$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{\n title = {Agroforestry Policy Review},\n type = {techreport},\n year = {2010},\n source = {Policy Review},\n pages = {1-28},\n id = {1884f5c3-a479-3a4f-b730-fa4738e880cd},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:46.589Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:11.177Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {A lack of policy support is seen as one of the main barriers to wider adoption of agroforestry, with the integration of trees at a low density into agricultural land challenging the conventional specialisation of forestry and agricultural policy mechanisms (Dupraz et al., 2004). Within the EU, it is necessary to examine how agroforestry fits into the two pillars of agricultural support; Pillar I - direct aids and market support, and Pillar II - rural development, as well as within forestry policy schemes for farm woodlands.},\n bibtype = {techreport},\n author = {Smith, J}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Palma, J.; Keesman, K., J.; van der Werf, W.; Dupraz, C.; van Keulen, H.; Herzog, F.; and Mayus, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Modelling, 221(13-14): 1744-1756. 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2010},\n pages = {1744-1756},\n volume = {221},\n id = {a602f208-6086-3992-a12c-f368d45faec5},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.015Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.015Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n notes = {Times Cited: 0},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Silvoarable agroforestry, the integration of trees and arable crops on the same area, has the potential to offer production, ecological, and societal benefits. However, the uptake of such systems in Europe has been limited by a combination of unsupportive policies and uncertainty concerning their productivity, profitability, and environmental impact. Faced with a lack of experimental data, the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model offers one method for generating plausible yield data and improving understanding of production in mixed tree-crop systems under European conditions. The applicability of the model was examined by: (i) selecting two contrasting sites in France and the UK with measured agricultural, silvoarable and/or forestry data, (ii) implementing the model in a software package, and (iii) inputting data and parameters on the climate, soils, management regime, and tree and crop types. Following calibration, Yield-SAFE provided credible descriptions of measured arable and tree (Populus spp.) yields in the monoculture and silvoarable systems at the two sites. An examination of the response of the model to changes in model parameters and environmental and management data showed that silvoarable crop yields were most sensitive to variations in tree parameters. Increased soil depths increased timber yields, and increasing stand density increased stand volume whilst decreasing individual tree volume. In all the simulations, the model predicted greater efficiency in use of land, i.e. greater land equivalent ratios, when trees and crops were combined rather than grown as sole crops. These results, supported by the sparse experimental data available, indicate that agroforestry provides a method of increasing food, timber and biomass production from limited land resources in Europe. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Palma, J and Keesman, K J and van der Werf, W and Dupraz, C and van Keulen, H and Herzog, F and Mayus, M},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.008},\n journal = {Ecological Modelling},\n number = {13-14}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2009\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The impact of two arable field margin management schemes on litter decomposition.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Potts, S., G.; Woodcock, B., A.; and Eggleton, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Applied Soil Ecology, 41(1): 90-97. 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {The impact of two arable field margin management schemes on litter decomposition},\n type = {article},\n year = {2009},\n keywords = {Agri-environment schemes,Decomposition,Litter-bags,Soil macrofauna,Vegetation management},\n pages = {90-97},\n volume = {41},\n id = {19e42f63-20cb-3f3c-8b62-0c96e178f326},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:44.244Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:09.140Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {A primary objective of agri-environment schemes is the conservation of biodiversity; in addition to increasing the value of farmland for wildlife, these schemes also aim to restore natural ecosystem functioning. The management of scheme options can influence their value for delivering ecosystem services by modifying the composition of floral and faunal communities. This study examines the impact of an agri-environment scheme prescription on ecosystem functioning by testing the hypothesis that vegetation management influences decomposition rates in grassy arable field margins. The effects of two vegetation management practices in arable field margins - cutting and soil disturbance (scarification) - on litter decomposition were compared using a litterbag experimental approach in early April 2006. Bags had either small mesh designed to restrict access to soil macrofauna, or large mesh that would allow macrofauna to enter. Bags were positioned on the soil surface or inserted into the soil in cut and scarified margins, retrieved after 44, 103 and 250 days and the amount of litter mass remaining was calculated. Litter loss from the litterbags with large mesh was greater than from the small mesh bags, providing evidence that soil macrofauna accelerate rates of litter decomposition. In the large mesh bags, the proportion of litter remaining in bags above and belowground in the cut plots was similar, while in the scarified plots, there was significantly more litter left in the aboveground bags than in the belowground bags. This loss of balance between decomposition rates above and belowground in scarified margins may have implications for the development and maintenance of grassy arable field margins by influencing nutrient availability for plant communities. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Potts, Simon G. and Woodcock, Ben A. and Eggleton, Paul},\n doi = {10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.09.003},\n journal = {Applied Soil Ecology},\n number = {1}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A six year study of earthworm (Lumbricidae) populations in pasture woodland in southern England shows their responses to soil temperature and soil moisture.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Eggleton, P.; Inward, K.; Smith, J.; Jones, D., T.; and Sherlock, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(9): 1857-1865. 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"A$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {A six year study of earthworm (Lumbricidae) populations in pasture woodland in southern England shows their responses to soil temperature and soil moisture},\n type = {article},\n year = {2009},\n keywords = {Climate responses,Non-parametric regression,Soil conditions,Soil ecosystem engineers},\n pages = {1857-1865},\n volume = {41},\n id = {316068f0-1f10-3180-98a8-809e267dac64},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:44.718Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:09.562Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {There are very few studies on the effects of temporal changes in soil properties on ecosystem engineers in UK soils. This study addresses this lack by presenting earthworm diversity data from a six-year seasonality study comprising 72 monthly samples from the litter and soil of pasture woodland in the New Forest, southern England. These data were analysed in the context of soil moisture and soil temperature, key factors affecting earthworm abundance, and factors likely to be strongly affected by future climate change. The data for the whole period were analysed using non-parametric regression and an additive model used to separate within-year and between-year effects. Seasonal patterns are present for all the common species, generally with a maximum in March and a minimum in September. A majority of the five commonest species show a strong decline in abundance during the two extremely dry periods (2002-2003 and 2006). In sharp contrast, the same species showed a relative increase during the very wet summer and autumn of 2007. There was, however, no significant overall trend in either the climate data or the earthworm species data. The epigeic species, Dendrobaena octaedra, showed the largest decline in the driest months which caused a crash to the point where there were no adults sampled during the four dry summer months of 2003. A second congeneric species, Dendrobaena attemsi, also epigeic, appears to have invaded the woodland during the six year period and is increasing rapidly in abundance. This may indicate the start of a shift in the distribution of the two species, as D. octaedra generally has a northern European distribution and is frost-tolerant, while D. attemsi has a southern European distribution and is more drought-tolerant. In contrast, the very wet summer of 2007 seems to have damped the usual periodic seasonal oscillations in earthworm numbers. Endogeic worm species do not show the D. octaedra seasonal pattern as obviously, probably because these species are able to move more freely through the soil and because they are able to aestivate. These changes are likely to be due to a combination of human movement of earthworms (e.g. D. attemsi) and variations in local climate. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Eggleton, Paul and Inward, Kelly and Smith, Joanne and Jones, David T. and Sherlock, Emma},\n doi = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.06.007},\n journal = {Soil Biology and Biochemistry},\n number = {9}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n There are very few studies on the effects of temporal changes in soil properties on ecosystem engineers in UK soils. This study addresses this lack by presenting earthworm diversity data from a six-year seasonality study comprising 72 monthly samples from the litter and soil of pasture woodland in the New Forest, southern England. These data were analysed in the context of soil moisture and soil temperature, key factors affecting earthworm abundance, and factors likely to be strongly affected by future climate change. The data for the whole period were analysed using non-parametric regression and an additive model used to separate within-year and between-year effects. Seasonal patterns are present for all the common species, generally with a maximum in March and a minimum in September. A majority of the five commonest species show a strong decline in abundance during the two extremely dry periods (2002-2003 and 2006). In sharp contrast, the same species showed a relative increase during the very wet summer and autumn of 2007. There was, however, no significant overall trend in either the climate data or the earthworm species data. The epigeic species, Dendrobaena octaedra, showed the largest decline in the driest months which caused a crash to the point where there were no adults sampled during the four dry summer months of 2003. A second congeneric species, Dendrobaena attemsi, also epigeic, appears to have invaded the woodland during the six year period and is increasing rapidly in abundance. This may indicate the start of a shift in the distribution of the two species, as D. octaedra generally has a northern European distribution and is frost-tolerant, while D. attemsi has a southern European distribution and is more drought-tolerant. In contrast, the very wet summer of 2007 seems to have damped the usual periodic seasonal oscillations in earthworm numbers. Endogeic worm species do not show the D. octaedra seasonal pattern as obviously, probably because these species are able to move more freely through the soil and because they are able to aestivate. These changes are likely to be due to a combination of human movement of earthworms (e.g. D. attemsi) and variations in local climate. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.\n

\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2008\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Evaluating the efficiency of sampling methods in assessing soil macrofauna communities in arable systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Potts, S.; and Eggleton, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n European Journal of Soil Biology, 44(3): 271-276. 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Evaluating$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Evaluating the efficiency of sampling methods in assessing soil macrofauna communities in arable systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2008},\n keywords = {Berlese-Tullgren funnels,Handsorting,Sampling efficiency,Soil core size,Soil macrofauna,Winkler extraction},\n pages = {271-276},\n volume = {44},\n id = {f4dc8fe1-f94d-3cb0-9eec-72086f54b261},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:43.149Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:08.333Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The soil fauna is often a neglected group in many large-scale studies of farmland biodiversity due to difficulties in extracting organisms efficiently from the soil. This study assesses the relative efficiency of the simple and cheap sampling method of handsorting against Berlese-Tullgren funnel and Winkler apparatus extraction. Soil cores were taken from grassy arable field margins and wheat fields in Cambridgeshire, UK, and the efficiencies of the three methods in assessing the abundances and species densities of soil macroinvertebrates were compared. Handsorting in most cases was as efficient at extracting the majority of the soil macrofauna as the Berlese-Tullgren funnel and Winkler bag methods, although it underestimated the species densities of the woodlice and adult beetles. There were no obvious biases among the three methods for the particular vegetation types sampled and no significant differences in the size distributions of the earthworms and beetles. Proportionally fewer damaged earthworms were recorded in larger (25 × 25 cm) soil cores when compared with smaller ones (15 × 15 cm). Handsorting has many benefits, including targeted extraction, minimum disturbance to the habitat and shorter sampling periods and may be the most appropriate method for studies of farmland biodiversity when a high number of soil cores need to be sampled. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Joanne and Potts, Simon and Eggleton, Paul},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.02.002},\n journal = {European Journal of Soil Biology},\n number = {3}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The value of sown grass margins for enhancing soil macrofaunal biodiversity in arable systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Potts, S.; and Eggleton, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127(1-2): 119-125. 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {The value of sown grass margins for enhancing soil macrofaunal biodiversity in arable systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2008},\n keywords = {Agri-environment schemes,Functional diversity,Grass margins,Soil macrofauna},\n pages = {119-125},\n volume = {127},\n id = {a255ae0d-bef6-38a2-a04b-bb59d07b5957},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:45.190Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:09.968Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The presence of a grass strip was found to be beneficial to soil macrofauna, increasing the species densities and abundances of earthworms, woodlice and staphylinid beetles. The biodiversity of the three main feeding groups - predators, soil ingesters and litter consumers - was also significantly higher in the grass strips than in the field edges without strips, indicating that establishment of grassy margins in arable fields may enhance ecosystem services such as soil fertility and pest control. The grass strip habitat contained a large number of species of soil macrofauna, being second only to hedgerow habitat, with 10% of the total species list for the farm found only within the margins. Of the rare species recorded on the farm, five of the nine were from the grass strips, four of which were found only there. This study shows that establishing grassy strips in the margins of arable fields increases the biodiversity of the soil macrofauna, both within fields (alpha diversity) and across the farm (beta diversity). © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Potts, Simon and Eggleton, Paul},\n doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.008},\n journal = {Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment},\n number = {1-2}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2007\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Methodological approach for the assessment of environmental effects of agroforestry at the landscape scale.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Graves, A.; Burgess, P., J.; Keesman, K.; van Keulen, H.; Mayus, M.; Reisner, Y.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29: 450-462. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Methodological approach for the assessment of environmental effects of agroforestry at the landscape scale},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {450-462},\n volume = {29},\n id = {e19002ee-7476-38a9-b96e-bccbda7c48fe},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.241Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.241Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J and Graves, A and Burgess, P J and Keesman, K and van Keulen, H and Mayus, M and Reisner, Y and Herzog, F},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n keywords = {504 -1st paper of Phd}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modeling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., H., N.; Graves, A., R.; Bunce, R., G., H.; Burgess, P., J.; de Filippi, R.; Keesman, K., J.; van Keulen, H.; Liagre, F.; Mayus, M.; Moreno, G.; Reisner, Y.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 119(3-4): 320-334. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modeling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n keywords = {agri-environmental policy,alley cropping,carbon sequestration,erosion,experience,grasslands,hydraulic-properties,land use,land-use,landscape diversity,nitrogen leaching,nutrient loss,plantations,soils,systems,variability},\n pages = {320-334},\n volume = {119},\n id = {ec36934c-502d-38a8-9971-3d1bbaef2bb5},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.474Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:27.474Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {133LT<br/>Times Cited:22<br/>Cited References Count:89},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Increased adoption of silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) systems in Europe, by integrating trees and arable crops on the same land, could offer a range of environmental benefits compared with conventional agricultural systems. Soil erosion, nitrogen leaching, carbon sequestration and landscape biodiversity were chosen as indicators to assess a stratified random sample of 19 landscape test sites in the Mediterranean and Atlantic regions of Europe. At each site, the effect of introducing agroforestry was examined at plot-scale by simulating the growth of one of five tree species (hybrid walnut Juglans spp., wild cherry Prunus avium L., poplar Populus spp., holm oak Quercus ilex L. subsp. ilex and stone pine Pinus pinea L.) at two tree densities (50 and 113 trees ha(-1)) in combination with up to five crops (wheat Triticum spp., sunflower Helianthus annuus L., oilseed rape Brassica napus L., grain maize and silage maize Zea mays L.). At landscape-scale, the effect of introducing agroforestry on 10 or 50% of the agricultural area, on either the best or worst quality land, was examined. Across the 19 landscape test sites, SAF had a positive impact on the four indicators with the strongest effects when introduced on the best quality land. The computer simulations showed that SAF could significantly reduce erosion by up to 65% when combined with contouring practices at medium (> 0.5 and < 3 t ha(-1) a(-1)) and high (> 3 t ha(-1) a(-1)) erosion sites. Nitrogen leaching could be reduced by up to 28% in areas where leaching is currently estimated high (> 100 kg N h(-1) a(-1)), but this was dependent on tree density. With agroforestry, predicted mean carbon sequestration through immobilization in trees, over a 60-year period, ranged from 0.1 to 3.0 t C h(-1) a(-1) (5-179 t C h(-1)) depending on tree species and location. Landscape biodiversity was increased by introducing SAF by an average factor of 2.6. The implications of this potential for environmental benefits at European-scale are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J H N and Graves, A R and Bunce, R G H and Burgess, P J and de Filippi, R and Keesman, K J and van Keulen, H and Liagre, F and Mayus, M and Moreno, G and Reisner, Y and Herzog, F},\n doi = {DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.021},\n journal = {Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment},\n number = {3-4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n Increased adoption of silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) systems in Europe, by integrating trees and arable crops on the same land, could offer a range of environmental benefits compared with conventional agricultural systems. Soil erosion, nitrogen leaching, carbon sequestration and landscape biodiversity were chosen as indicators to assess a stratified random sample of 19 landscape test sites in the Mediterranean and Atlantic regions of Europe. At each site, the effect of introducing agroforestry was examined at plot-scale by simulating the growth of one of five tree species (hybrid walnut Juglans spp., wild cherry Prunus avium L., poplar Populus spp., holm oak Quercus ilex L. subsp. ilex and stone pine Pinus pinea L.) at two tree densities (50 and 113 trees ha(-1)) in combination with up to five crops (wheat Triticum spp., sunflower Helianthus annuus L., oilseed rape Brassica napus L., grain maize and silage maize Zea mays L.). At landscape-scale, the effect of introducing agroforestry on 10 or 50% of the agricultural area, on either the best or worst quality land, was examined. Across the 19 landscape test sites, SAF had a positive impact on the four indicators with the strongest effects when introduced on the best quality land. The computer simulations showed that SAF could significantly reduce erosion by up to 65% when combined with contouring practices at medium (> 0.5 and < 3 t ha(-1) a(-1)) and high (> 3 t ha(-1) a(-1)) erosion sites. Nitrogen leaching could be reduced by up to 28% in areas where leaching is currently estimated high (> 100 kg N h(-1) a(-1)), but this was dependent on tree density. With agroforestry, predicted mean carbon sequestration through immobilization in trees, over a 60-year period, ranged from 0.1 to 3.0 t C h(-1) a(-1) (5-179 t C h(-1)) depending on tree species and location. Landscape biodiversity was increased by introducing SAF by an average factor of 2.6. The implications of this potential for environmental benefits at European-scale are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; van der Werf, W.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Economics, 63(4): 759-767. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n keywords = {agricultural policy,carbon sequestration,erosion,land use alternatives,landscape biodiversity,multicriteria decision,net present value,nitrogen leaching,nutrient loss,promethee,promethee method,systems},\n pages = {759-767},\n volume = {63},\n id = {a5973eb7-978f-3ac4-8f92-70e5971567e6},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.119Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:28.119Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {202DW<br/>Times Cited:0<br/>Cited References Count:46},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The environmental and economic performance of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe is highly variable. Multi-criteria analysis, using the PROMETHEE outranking approach, was used to evaluate the integrated performance of silvoarable agroforestry on hypothetical farms in nineteen landscape test sites in Spain, France, and The Netherlands. The silvoarable scenarios allocated a proportion of the hypothetical farms (10 or 50%) to silvoarable agroforestry at two different tree densities (50 or 113 trees ha(-1)) on two different qualities of land (best or worst quality land). The status quo (conventional arable farming) was also assessed for comparison. The criteria used in the evaluation (soil erosion, nitrogen leaching, carbon sequestration, landscape biodiversity, and infinite net present value) were assessed at each landscape test site; infinite net present value was assessed under six levels of government support. In France, the analysis showed, assuming equal weighting between environmental and economic performance, that silvoarable agroforestry was preferable to conventional arable farming. The best results were observed when agroforestry was implemented on 50% of the highest quality land on the farm; the effect of tree density (50113 trees ha(-1)) was small. By contrast, in Spain and The Netherlands, the consistently greater profitability of conventional arable agriculture relative to the agroforestry alternatives made overall performance of agroforestry systems dependent on the proportion of the farm planted, and the tree density and land quality used. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J and Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and van der Werf, W and Herzog, F},\n doi = {DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.011},\n journal = {Ecological Economics},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Yield-SAFE: A parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n van der Werf, W.; Keesman, K.; Burgess, P.; Graves, A.; Pilbeam, D.; Incoll, L., D.; Metselaar, K.; Mayus, M.; Stappers, R.; van Keulen, H.; Palma, J.; and Dupraz, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29(4): 419-433. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Yield-SAFE: A parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n keywords = {607 - YieldSAFE Model},\n pages = {419-433},\n volume = {29},\n id = {e1f35a87-65d5-3549-8f79-c9654e0f99ec},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.286Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:29.286Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {153OT<br/>Times Cited:4<br/>Cited References Count:32},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {1.Silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) is the cultivation of trees and arable crops on the same parcel of land. SAF may contribute to modern diversified land use objectives in Europe, such as enhanced biodiversity and productivity, reduced leaching of nitrogen, protection against flooding and erosion, and attractiveness of the landscape. Long-term yield predictions are needed to assess long-term economic profitability of SAF.2.A model for growth, resource sharing and productivity in agroforestry systems was developed to act as a tool in forecasts of yield, economic optimization of farming enterprises and exploration of policy options for land use in Europe. The model is called Yield-SAFE; from "YIeld Estimator for Long term Design of Silvoarable AgroForestry in Europe". The model was developed with as few equations and parameters as possible to allow model parameterization under constrained availability of data from long-term experiments.3.The model consists of seven state equations expressing the temporal dynamics of: (1) tree biomass; (2) tree leaf area; (3) number of shoots per tree; (4) crop biomass; (5) crop leaf area index; (6) heat sum; and (7) soil water content. The main outputs of the model are the growth dynamics and final yields of trees and crops. Daily inputs are temperature, radiation and precipitation. Planting densities, initial biomasses of tree and crop species, and soil parameters must be specified.4.A parameterization of Yield-SAFE is generated, using published yield tables for tree growth and output from the comprehensive crop simulation model STICS. Analysis of tree and crop growth data from two poplar agroforestry stands in the United Kingdom demonstrates the validity of the modelling concept and calibration philosophy of Yield-SAFE. A sensitivity analysis is presented to elucidate which biological parameters most influence short and long-term productivity and land equivalent ratio.5.The conceptual model, elaborated in Yield-SAFE, in combination with the outlined procedure for model calibration, offers a valid tool for exploratory land use studies. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {van der Werf, Wopke and Keesman, Karel and Burgess, Paul and Graves, Anil and Pilbeam, David and Incoll, L. D. and Metselaar, Klaas and Mayus, Martina and Stappers, Roel and van Keulen, Herman and Palma, João and Dupraz, Christian},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.017},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n

\n 1.Silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) is the cultivation of trees and arable crops on the same parcel of land. SAF may contribute to modern diversified land use objectives in Europe, such as enhanced biodiversity and productivity, reduced leaching of nitrogen, protection against flooding and erosion, and attractiveness of the landscape. Long-term yield predictions are needed to assess long-term economic profitability of SAF.2.A model for growth, resource sharing and productivity in agroforestry systems was developed to act as a tool in forecasts of yield, economic optimization of farming enterprises and exploration of policy options for land use in Europe. The model is called Yield-SAFE; from \"YIeld Estimator for Long term Design of Silvoarable AgroForestry in Europe\". The model was developed with as few equations and parameters as possible to allow model parameterization under constrained availability of data from long-term experiments.3.The model consists of seven state equations expressing the temporal dynamics of: (1) tree biomass; (2) tree leaf area; (3) number of shoots per tree; (4) crop biomass; (5) crop leaf area index; (6) heat sum; and (7) soil water content. The main outputs of the model are the growth dynamics and final yields of trees and crops. Daily inputs are temperature, radiation and precipitation. Planting densities, initial biomasses of tree and crop species, and soil parameters must be specified.4.A parameterization of Yield-SAFE is generated, using published yield tables for tree growth and output from the comprehensive crop simulation model STICS. Analysis of tree and crop growth data from two poplar agroforestry stands in the United Kingdom demonstrates the validity of the modelling concept and calibration philosophy of Yield-SAFE. A sensitivity analysis is presented to elucidate which biological parameters most influence short and long-term productivity and land equivalent ratio.5.The conceptual model, elaborated in Yield-SAFE, in combination with the outlined procedure for model calibration, offers a valid tool for exploratory land use studies. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling for Water Management: First Calibration of Yield-SAFE for irrigated maize in Mediterranean regions.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mayus, M.; Palma, J.; Topçu, S.; Kirda, C.; Herzog, F.; Van Keulen, H.; Keesman, K.; and Van der Werf, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Lecture Notes in Informatics, P-101: 3. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Modelling$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling for Water Management: First Calibration of Yield-SAFE for irrigated maize in Mediterranean regions},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {3},\n volume = {P-101},\n websites = {http://cs.zblmath.fiz-karlsruhe.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings101/gi-proc-101-033.pdf},\n chapter = {143},\n id = {2c19b14a-b669-3d2e-8175-279b8ea83960},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.206Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.206Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {In the Mediterranean region, careful management of water and nitrogen utilization is required to achieve high crop yields in a sustainable and economic way. Prediction models are useful tools for deriving site/region–specific optimum management strategies for irrigation and nitrogen use. Yield-SAFE, a simple and robust model for growth and resource use in agroforestry systems, simulates crop yields under rainfed and irrigated conditions. This paper represents a refined calibration with respect to the fluxes of water, based on, data from an irrigation/fertilisation experiment with maize in the South-East of Turkey. The model performs satisfactorily and further development will includede nitrogen leaching calibration and validation.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Mayus, M and Palma, J and Topçu, S and Kirda, C and Herzog, F and Van Keulen, H and Keesman, K and Van der Werf, W},\n journal = {Lecture Notes in Informatics},\n keywords = {online}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Target regions for silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Reisner, Y.; De Filippi, R.; Herzog, F.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29: 401-418. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Target regions for silvoarable agroforestry in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {401-418},\n volume = {29},\n id = {67051a10-1eb2-3fb1-b0fb-ae77a1d470b4},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.690Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.690Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Reisner, Y and De Filippi, R and Herzog, F and Palma, J},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n keywords = {505}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Palma, J., H., N.; Herzog, F.; Moreno, G.; Bertomeu, M.; Dupraz, C.; Liagre, F.; Keesman, K.; van der Werf, W.; de Nooy, A., K.; and van den Briel, J., P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29(4): 434-449. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n keywords = {agroforestry,arable,biophysical,economics,farm-safe,forestry,land,modelling,poplar,silvoarable,soils,temperate,walnut,yield-safe},\n pages = {434-449},\n volume = {29},\n id = {00d77cf8-5f65-392f-a2db-86902472b81a},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.767Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.767Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {153OT<br/>Times Cited:20<br/>Cited References Count:43},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Silvoarable agroforestry could promote use of trees on farms in Europe, but its likely effect on production, farm profitability, and environmental services is poorly understood. Hence, from 2001 to 2005, the Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe project developed a systematic process to evaluate the biophysical and economic performance of arable, forestry, and silvoarable systems in Spain, France, and The Netherlands. A biophysical model called "Yield-SAFE" was developed to predict long-term yields for the different systems and local statistics and expert opinion were used to derive their revenue, costs, and pre- and post-2005 grant regimes. These data were then used in an economic model called "Farm-SAFE" to predict plot- and farm-scale profitability Land equivalent ratios were greater than one, showing Yield-SAFE predicted that growing trees and crops in silvoarable systems was more productive than growing them separately. Pre-2005 grants in Spain and The Netherlands penalised silvoarable systems, but post-2005 grants were more equitable. In France, walnut and poplar silvoarable systems were consistently the most profitable system under both grant regimes. In Spain, holm oak and stone pine silvoarable systems were the least profitable system under pre-2005 grants, but only marginally less profitable than arable systems under post-2005 grants. In The Netherlands, low timber values and the opportunity cost of losing arable land for slurry manure application made 'Silvoarable and forestry systems uncompetitive with arable systems under both grant regimes. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Palma, J H N and Herzog, F and Moreno, G and Bertomeu, M and Dupraz, C and Liagre, F and Keesman, K and van der Werf, W and de Nooy, A K and van den Briel, J P},\n doi = {DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.018},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A., R.; Burgess, P., J.; Palma, J., H., N.; Herzog, F.; Moreno, G.; Bertomeu, M.; Dupraz, C.; Liagre, F.; Keesman, K.; van der Werf, W.; de Nooy, A., K.; and van den Briel, J., P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29(4): 434-449. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n keywords = {agroforestry,arable,biophysical,economics,farm-safe,forestry,land,modelling,poplar,silvoarable,soils,temperate,walnut,yield-safe},\n pages = {434-449},\n volume = {29},\n id = {be6dbf6c-f18c-3fff-84a2-55a9e0d62f76},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.003Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.003Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {153OT<br/>Times Cited:20<br/>Cited References Count:43},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Silvoarable agroforestry could promote use of trees on farms in Europe, but its likely effect on production, farm profitability, and environmental services is poorly understood. Hence, from 2001 to 2005, the Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe project developed a systematic process to evaluate the biophysical and economic performance of arable, forestry, and silvoarable systems in Spain, France, and The Netherlands. A biophysical model called "Yield-SAFE" was developed to predict long-term yields for the different systems and local statistics and expert opinion were used to derive their revenue, costs, and pre- and post-2005 grant regimes. These data were then used in an economic model called "Farm-SAFE" to predict plot- and farm-scale profitability Land equivalent ratios were greater than one, showing Yield-SAFE predicted that growing trees and crops in silvoarable systems was more productive than growing them separately. Pre-2005 grants in Spain and The Netherlands penalised silvoarable systems, but post-2005 grants were more equitable. In France, walnut and poplar silvoarable systems were consistently the most profitable system under both grant regimes. In Spain, holm oak and stone pine silvoarable systems were the least profitable system under pre-2005 grants, but only marginally less profitable than arable systems under post-2005 grants. In The Netherlands, low timber values and the opportunity cost of losing arable land for slurry manure application made 'Silvoarable and forestry systems uncompetitive with arable systems under both grant regimes. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A R and Burgess, P J and Palma, J H N and Herzog, F and Moreno, G and Bertomeu, M and Dupraz, C and Liagre, F and Keesman, K and van der Werf, W and de Nooy, A K and van den Briel, J P},\n doi = {DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.018},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J.; Graves, A.; Bunce, R.; Burgess, P.; De Filippi, R.; Keesman, K.; van Keulen, H.; Mayus, M.; Reisner, Y.; Liagre, F.; Moreno, G.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 119(3-4): 320-334. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {320-334},\n volume = {119},\n id = {d608550d-4b1c-3c38-9736-67c15b3c66f8},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.204Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.204Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J and Graves, A and Bunce, R and Burgess, P and De Filippi, R and Keesman, K and van Keulen, H and Mayus, M and Reisner, Y and Liagre, F and Moreno, G and Herzog, F},\n journal = {Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment},\n number = {3-4},\n keywords = {606 - 2nd paper of Phd}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable and forestry systems in three European countries.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Graves, A.; Burgess, P.; Palma, J., H., N.; Herzog, F.; Moreno, G.; Bertomeu, M.; Dupraz, C.; Liagre, F.; Keesman, K.; van der Werf, W.; Koeffeman de Nooy, A.; and van den Briel, J., P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecological Engineering, 29: 434-449. 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable and forestry systems in three European countries},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {434-449},\n volume = {29},\n id = {524003bd-3715-3000-a369-8b2bdb00f3f7},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.752Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:32.752Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Graves, A and Burgess, P and Palma, J H N and Herzog, F and Moreno, G and Bertomeu, M and Dupraz, C and Liagre, F and Keesman, K and van der Werf, W and Koeffeman de Nooy, A and van den Briel, J P},\n journal = {Ecological Engineering},\n keywords = {416 - anil's paper for ecological engineering}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2006\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Baseline biodiversity surveys of the soil macrofauna of London's green spaces.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Smith, J.; Chapman, A.; and Eggleton, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Urban Ecosystems, 9(4): 337-349. 2006.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Baseline$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Baseline biodiversity surveys of the soil macrofauna of London's green spaces},\n type = {article},\n year = {2006},\n keywords = {Domestic gardens,Soil macrofauna,Urban biodiversity},\n pages = {337-349},\n volume = {9},\n id = {937f0b07-984a-3c43-86ef-0ef97347b168},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:03:42.704Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {0f87fe5f-bd00-3be7-a28d-24fa41159f22},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:04:07.890Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {A serious barrier to our understanding of urban ecosystems is a lack of information on the ecology of soils organisms of green spaces within large cities. This study addresses this gap by providing baseline survey data on the biodiversity of soil macrofauna in urban parks and domestic gardens of London, UK. In April and June 2004, the soil macrofauna were handsorted from soil cores in eleven parks and gardens of various sizes in central London. Five taxa were identified to species (Lumbricidae, Isopoda, Diplopoda, Chilopoda and Formicidae). The biodiversity value of the two main habitats (horticultural borders and mown grass lawns) was assessed and the influence of a range of environmental factors on species density (number of species per unit area) examined. The species densities of the studied soil invertebrates in the urban gardens were comparable with those found in natural ecosystems, although plant borders contained significantly more species than lawns. Borders had higher levels of plant nutrients, higher floristic diversity and lower levels of micronutrients and heavy metals than lawns. Significant predictor variables of species densities in the plant borders were the percentage of leaf litter cover, sampling month and soil pH. Species densities in the lawns were significantly correlated with the distance of the samples from the edge of the lawn. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Smith, Jo and Chapman, Anna and Eggleton, Paul},\n doi = {10.1007/s11252-006-0001-8},\n journal = {Urban Ecosystems},\n number = {4}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Integrated Assessment of Silvoarable Agroforestry at Landscape Scale .\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., H., N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, 2006.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Integrated$ Website\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@phdthesis{\n title = {Integrated Assessment of Silvoarable Agroforestry at Landscape Scale },\n type = {phdthesis},\n year = {2006},\n source = {Forest Ecology and Forest Management - Laboratory of Geo-information Science and Remote Sensing},\n pages = {136},\n websites = {http://edepot.wur.nl/121834},\n publisher = {Wageningen University - C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (Sustainable production and conservation systems)},\n city = {Wageningen},\n id = {39930937-2d76-3058-a444-9bb427c70235},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.520Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.520Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Thesis},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {phdthesis},\n author = {Palma, J H N},\n keywords = {Thesis-Book}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Modelling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Palma, J., H., N.; Graves, A., R.; Bunce, R., G., H.; Burgess, P., J.; de Filippi, R.; Keesman, K., J.; van Keulen, H.; Liagre, F.; Mayus, M.; Moreno, G.; Reisner, Y.; and Herzog, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Changing European Farming Systems for a Better Future: New Visions for Rural Areas,138-143. 2006.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Modelling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe},\n type = {article},\n year = {2006},\n keywords = {agri-environmental policy,alley cropping,carbon sequestration,erosion,landscape diversity,nitrogen leaching},\n pages = {138-143},\n id = {5ccae39b-8a77-3d0c-80e5-6ef2aa2a39b3},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.869Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:30.869Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n language = {English},\n notes = {Bex41<br/>Times Cited:0<br/>Cited References Count:11},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Increased adoption of silvoarable agroforestry (SAF) systems in Europe, by integrating trees and arable crops on the same land, could offer environmental benefits compared with conventional agricultural systems. Soil erosion, nitrogen Leaching, carbon sequestration and Landscape biodiversity were assessed for a stratified random sample of 19 Landscape test sites in Mediterranean and Atlantic regions of Europe using computer models developed in the Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe (SAFE) project. At each site, the effect of introducing agroforestry was examined by simulating the growth of one of five tree species (hybrid walnut Juglans spp., wild cherry Prunus avium L., poplar Populus spp., holm oak Quercus ilex L. subsp. ilex and stone pine Pinus pinea L.) at two tree densities (50 and 113 trees ha-1) in combination with up to five crops (wheat, sunflower, oilseed, grain maize and silage maize). Across the 19 landscape test sites, SAF had a positive impact on the four indicators with the strongest effects when introduced on the best quality land. The computer simulations showed that SAF could significantly reduce erosion by up to 65% when combined with contouring practices. Nitrogen Leaching could be reduced by 21%. With agroforestry, predicted mean carbon sequestration, over a 60-year period, ranged from 5 to 179 t C ha(-1) depending on tree species and location. Landscape biodiversity was increased by introducing SAF by an average factor of 2.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Palma, J H N and Graves, A R and Bunce, R G H and Burgess, P J and de Filippi, R and Keesman, K J and van Keulen, H and Liagre, F and Mayus, M and Moreno, G and Reisner, Y and Herzog, F},\n journal = {Changing European Farming Systems for a Better Future: New Visions for Rural Areas}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2004\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Upscaling Wind and Water Erosion Models. Far from Reality?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Visser, S.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Volume 50 . Wind and Rain Interaction in Erosion - Tropical Resource Management Papers, pages 59-67. Visser, S.; and Cornelis, W., editor(s). Wageningen University and Research Center, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inbook{\n type = {inbook},\n year = {2004},\n pages = {59-67},\n volume = {50},\n publisher = {Wageningen University and Research Center},\n city = {Wageningen},\n id = {ef7a9bf5-04f0-3390-9ff5-4dc40bec202f},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.022Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.022Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Book Section},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inbook},\n author = {Visser, S and Palma, J},\n editor = {Visser, S and Cornelis, W},\n chapter = {Upscaling Wind and Water Erosion Models. Far from Reality?},\n title = {Wind and Rain Interaction in Erosion - Tropical Resource Management Papers},\n keywords = {Book in Shelf}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Upscaling Wind and Water Erosion Models. Far from Reality?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Visser, S.; and Palma, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Volume 50 . Wind and Rain Interaction in Erosion - Tropical Resource Management Papers, pages 59-67. Visser, S.; and Cornelis, W., editor(s). Wageningen University and Research Center, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inbook{\n type = {inbook},\n year = {2004},\n pages = {59-67},\n volume = {50},\n publisher = {Wageningen University and Research Center},\n city = {Wageningen},\n id = {aa5008bc-aa8d-3cd6-b3a0-a22a3c605eeb},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.374Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.374Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Book Section},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {inbook},\n author = {Visser, S and Palma, J},\n editor = {Visser, S and Cornelis, W},\n chapter = {Upscaling Wind and Water Erosion Models. Far from Reality?},\n title = {Wind and Rain Interaction in Erosion - Tropical Resource Management Papers},\n keywords = {Book in Shelf}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2002\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Evaluation of the essential oils of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) from different zones of \"Alentejo\" (Portugal).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Serrano, E.; Palma, J.; Tinoco, T.; Venancio, F.; and Martins, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL RESEARCH , 14(2): 87-92. 2002.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{\n title = {Evaluation of the essential oils of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) from different zones of "Alentejo" (Portugal)},\n type = {article},\n year = {2002},\n pages = {87-92},\n volume = {14},\n id = {ac3b0c4a-8fc1-3131-a622-c33a7320ba04},\n created = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.043Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {b7274c91-4c26-3e19-b289-f05c1ceeac44},\n group_id = {bca40a69-62bb-3174-9d88-063deeac0c62},\n last_modified = {2021-05-25T11:27:31.043Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Serrano, E and Palma, J and Tinoco, T and Venancio, F and Martins, A},\n journal = {JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL RESEARCH },\n number = {2},\n keywords = {464}\n}

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n