\n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Conversation: Tensions and Possibilities between Learning and Participatory Design.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frauenberger, C.; Rogers, Y.; and Quintana, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In DiSalvo, B.; Yip, J.; Bonsignore, E.; and DiSalvo, C., editor(s),
Participatory Design for Learning - Perspectives from Practice and Research, pages 225–235. Routledge, 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{frauenberger_conversation_2017,\n\ttitle = {Conversation: {Tensions} and {Possibilities} between {Learning} and {Participatory} {Design}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-138-64098-6},\n\tbooktitle = {Participatory {Design} for {Learning} - {Perspectives} from {Practice} and {Research}},\n\tpublisher = {Routledge},\n\tauthor = {Frauenberger, Christopher and Rogers, Yvonne and Quintana, Chris},\n\teditor = {DiSalvo, Betsy and Yip, Jason and Bonsignore, Elisabeth and DiSalvo, Carl},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {225--235},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Values in Computing.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ferrario, M. A.; Simm, W.; Whittle, J.; Frauenberger, C.; Fitzpatrick, G.; and Purgathofer, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, of
CHI EA '17, pages 660–667, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{ferrario_values_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{CHI} {EA} '17},\n\ttitle = {Values in {Computing}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4656-6},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41814},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3027063.3027067},\n\tabstract = {Whether it is in the form of software, system architecture or interface design, anything digital is inevitably affected by values: the organizational values of the project sponsor, the values of the research partners, and the values of each developer and designer. Some values (e.g. commercial success, academic prestige) are easier to quantify than others (e.g. social justice, care for the environment) with the latter often dismissed in decision making processes as lacking of measurable 'evidence'. However, less easy to measure values are not less real: they are simply less visible. The aim of this one-day workshop is precisely to investigate mechanisms which give more exposure to those values in computing that are less frequently considered. We do so by bringing together practitioners from different computing backgrounds (e.g. software engineering, interaction design, information systems) who have first-hand experience of trying to represent on an equal footing all human values in computing.},\n\turldate = {2017-05-15},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {CHI} {Conference} {Extended} {Abstracts} on {Human} {Factors} in {Computing} {Systems}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Ferrario, Maria Angela and Simm, Will and Whittle, Jon and Frauenberger, Christopher and Fitzpatrick, Geraldine and Purgathofer, Peter},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {decision making processes, ethics in engineering, human values, participatory design, requirements capture, societal computing, values-theory},\n\tpages = {660--667},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Whether it is in the form of software, system architecture or interface design, anything digital is inevitably affected by values: the organizational values of the project sponsor, the values of the research partners, and the values of each developer and designer. Some values (e.g. commercial success, academic prestige) are easier to quantify than others (e.g. social justice, care for the environment) with the latter often dismissed in decision making processes as lacking of measurable 'evidence'. However, less easy to measure values are not less real: they are simply less visible. The aim of this one-day workshop is precisely to investigate mechanisms which give more exposure to those values in computing that are less frequently considered. We do so by bringing together practitioners from different computing backgrounds (e.g. software engineering, interaction design, information systems) who have first-hand experience of trying to represent on an equal footing all human values in computing.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spiel, K.; Malinverni, L.; Good, J.; and Frauenberger, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, of
CHI '17, pages 5755–5766, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
Honorable Mention (best 4% of submissions)\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{spiel_participatory_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{CHI} '17},\n\ttitle = {Participatory {Evaluation} with {Autistic} {Children}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4655-9},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41827},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3025453.3025851},\n\tabstract = {Participatory Design (PD) has become a standard methodology in HCI, however, the evaluation of the outcomes of participatory processes is often exclusively driven by researcher defined measures of success. Through our work with autistic children, who have radically different life worlds from our own, it became evident that their criteria for the success of a project are most likely also very different. In order to address the limitations of researcher defined and led evaluations in this context, we developed an approach for participatory evaluation called PEACE (Participatory Evaluation with Autistic ChildrEn). Using this approach, we were able to include autistic children in dedicated evaluation phases through the co-definition of goals and methods, joint processes of data gathering and the co-interpretation of results. We discuss three case studies in which we successfully applied our approach and conclude with a reflection on the novel insights created through participatory evaluation and researchers' roles in such a process.},\n\turldate = {2017-05-15},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {CHI} {Conference} on {Human} {Factors} in {Computing} {Systems}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Spiel, Katharina and Malinverni, Laura and Good, Judith and Frauenberger, Christopher},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Honorable Mention (best 4\\% of submissions)},\n\tkeywords = {Autism, children, participatory evaluation},\n\tpages = {5755--5766},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Participatory Design (PD) has become a standard methodology in HCI, however, the evaluation of the outcomes of participatory processes is often exclusively driven by researcher defined measures of success. Through our work with autistic children, who have radically different life worlds from our own, it became evident that their criteria for the success of a project are most likely also very different. In order to address the limitations of researcher defined and led evaluations in this context, we developed an approach for participatory evaluation called PEACE (Participatory Evaluation with Autistic ChildrEn). Using this approach, we were able to include autistic children in dedicated evaluation phases through the co-definition of goals and methods, joint processes of data gathering and the co-interpretation of results. We discuss three case studies in which we successfully applied our approach and conclude with a reflection on the novel insights created through participatory evaluation and researchers' roles in such a process.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n When Empathy Is Not Enough: Assessing the Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spiel, K.; Frauenberger, C.; Hornecker, E.; and Fitzpatrick, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, of
CHI '17, pages 2853–2864, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
Honorable Mention (best 4% of submissions)\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{spiel_when_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{CHI} '17},\n\ttitle = {When {Empathy} {Is} {Not} {Enough}: {Assessing} the {Experiences} of {Autistic} {Children} with {Technologies}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4655-9},\n\tshorttitle = {When {Empathy} {Is} {Not} {Enough}},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41826},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3025453.3025785},\n\tabstract = {Capturing and describing the multi-faceted experiences autistic children have with technologies provides a unique research challenge. Approaches based on pragmatist notions of experience, which mostly rely on empathy, are particularly limited if used alone. To address this we have developed an approach that combines Actor-Network Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis. Drawing on this approach, we discuss the experiences autistic children had with technologies resulting from the collaborative design process in the OutsideTheBox project. We construct a holistic picture of the experience by drawing on diverse data sources ranging from interviews to log-data, and most importantly, the first-hand perspective of autistic children. In four case studies, we demonstrate how this approach allowed us to develop unique individual and structural insights into the experiences of autistic children with technology.},\n\turldate = {2017-05-15},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {CHI} {Conference} on {Human} {Factors} in {Computing} {Systems}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Spiel, Katharina and Frauenberger, Christopher and Hornecker, Eva and Fitzpatrick, Geraldine},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Honorable Mention (best 4\\% of submissions)},\n\tkeywords = {Autism, Experience, children, co-design evaluation},\n\tpages = {2853--2864},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Capturing and describing the multi-faceted experiences autistic children have with technologies provides a unique research challenge. Approaches based on pragmatist notions of experience, which mostly rely on empathy, are particularly limited if used alone. To address this we have developed an approach that combines Actor-Network Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis. Drawing on this approach, we discuss the experiences autistic children had with technologies resulting from the collaborative design process in the OutsideTheBox project. We construct a holistic picture of the experience by drawing on diverse data sources ranging from interviews to log-data, and most importantly, the first-hand perspective of autistic children. In four case studies, we demonstrate how this approach allowed us to develop unique individual and structural insights into the experiences of autistic children with technology.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frauenberger, C.; Bruckman, A. S.; Munteanu, C.; Densmore, M.; and Waycott, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, of
CHI EA '17, pages 1295–1299, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{frauenberger_research_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{CHI} {EA} '17},\n\ttitle = {Research {Ethics} in {HCI}: {A} {Town} {Hall} {Meeting}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4656-6},\n\tshorttitle = {Research {Ethics} in {HCI}},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41825},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3027063.3051135},\n\tabstract = {As interactive technologies evolve and reach into every aspect of modern life, research practices in human-computer interaction (HCI) have changed. The methodological and epistemological foundations of the field are shifting to reflect the diversity of contexts in which rapidly changing digital technology is being used. Alongside these changes, new ethical challenges emerge for the HCI community, both in terms of research ethics and responsible research and innovation. Open dilemmas include issues such as the shifting meaning of informed consent, anonymisation or privacy in an always-online world. The SIGCHI Ethics Committee has been established to look into the processes, practices and structures at SIGCHI venues to deal with such ethical dilemmas and how they can be addressed in a transparent, consistent and open way. This town hall style panel will be an opportunity to prompt community discussion and collect input into how we can further address these challenges.},\n\turldate = {2017-05-15},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {CHI} {Conference} {Extended} {Abstracts} on {Human} {Factors} in {Computing} {Systems}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Frauenberger, Christopher and Bruckman, Amy S. and Munteanu, Cosmin and Densmore, Melissa and Waycott, Jenny},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {HCI, ethics},\n\tpages = {1295--1299},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n As interactive technologies evolve and reach into every aspect of modern life, research practices in human-computer interaction (HCI) have changed. The methodological and epistemological foundations of the field are shifting to reflect the diversity of contexts in which rapidly changing digital technology is being used. Alongside these changes, new ethical challenges emerge for the HCI community, both in terms of research ethics and responsible research and innovation. Open dilemmas include issues such as the shifting meaning of informed consent, anonymisation or privacy in an always-online world. The SIGCHI Ethics Committee has been established to look into the processes, practices and structures at SIGCHI venues to deal with such ethical dilemmas and how they can be addressed in a transparent, consistent and open way. This town hall style panel will be an opportunity to prompt community discussion and collect input into how we can further address these challenges.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Assistive Solutions in Practice: Experiences from AAL Pilot Regions in Austria.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ates, N.; Aumayr, G.; Drobics, M.; Förster, M.; Frauenberger, C.; Markus, G.; Manfred, K.; Daniela, K.; Johannes, K.; Kurt, M.; Johannes, O.; Felix, P.; Angelika, R.; Julia, S.; Cornelia, S.; Andreas, S.; Nadine, S.; Uli, W.; and Viktoria, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 236: Health Informatics Meets eHealth: 184–195. 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ates_assistive_2017,\n\ttitle = {Assistive {Solutions} in {Practice}: {Experiences} from {AAL} {Pilot} {Regions} in {Austria}},\n\tvolume = {236: Health Informatics Meets eHealth},\n\tcopyright = {©2017 \\© The authors and IOS Press.},\n\tissn = {0926-9630},\n\tshorttitle = {Assistive {Solutions} in {Practice}},\n\turl = {http://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospressISBN&isbn=978-1-61499-758-0&spage=184&doi=10.3233/978-1-61499-759-7-184},\n\tdoi = {10.3233/978-1-61499-759-7-184},\n\tabstract = {Since 2012 six AAL pilot regions were launched in Austria. The main goal of these pilot regions is to evaluate the impact of AAL technologies in daily use considering the entire value chain. Additionally, go-to market strategies for assistive technologies based on an involvement of all relevant stakeholders are developed. Within this paper an overview of the specific objectives, approaches and the status of all Austrian AAL pilot regions is given. Taking into account the different experiences of the different pilot regions, specific challenges in establishing, implementing and sustaining pilot region projects are discussed and lessons-learned are presented. Results show that a careful planning of all project phases taking into account available resources is crucial for the successful implementation of an AAL pilot region. In particular, this applies to all activities related to the active involvement of end-users.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2018-09-24},\n\tjournal = {Studies in Health Technology and Informatics},\n\tauthor = {Ates, Nesrin and Aumayr, Georg and Drobics, Mario and Förster, Maria and Frauenberger, Christopher and Markus, Garschall and Manfred, Kofler and Daniela, Krainer and Johannes, Kropf and Kurt, Majcen and Johannes, Oberzaucher and Felix, Piazolo and Angelika, Rzepka and Julia, Sauskojus and Cornelia, Schneider and Andreas, Stainer-Hochgatterer and Nadine, Sturm and Uli, Waibel and Viktoria, Willner},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {184--195},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Since 2012 six AAL pilot regions were launched in Austria. The main goal of these pilot regions is to evaluate the impact of AAL technologies in daily use considering the entire value chain. Additionally, go-to market strategies for assistive technologies based on an involvement of all relevant stakeholders are developed. Within this paper an overview of the specific objectives, approaches and the status of all Austrian AAL pilot regions is given. Taking into account the different experiences of the different pilot regions, specific challenges in establishing, implementing and sustaining pilot region projects are discussed and lessons-learned are presented. Results show that a careful planning of all project phases taking into account available resources is crucial for the successful implementation of an AAL pilot region. In particular, this applies to all activities related to the active involvement of end-users.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Interaction Design and Autistic Children.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frauenberger, C.; Makhaeva, J.; and Spiel, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, of
IDC '17, pages 743–748, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
event-place: Stanford, California, USA\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{frauenberger_interaction_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{IDC} '17},\n\ttitle = {Interaction {Design} and {Autistic} {Children}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4921-5},\n\turl = {https://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41813},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3078072.3081309},\n\tabstract = {With this workshop we aim to bring together researchers who explore interactive technologies in the context of autistic children. At a point at which considerable effort has been invested in this area and results are promising, but hardly conclusively convincing, we argue that it is time to critically reflect on our work. We do this by posing three provocative questions: 1) Are we trying to do the right thing? 2) Is it working? and 3) Does it matter? With all three questions we aim to kick-start a debate about the goals and intentions with which research is done in this area, how we define that technology is successful and how we can ensure that our research has real-world impact beyond the people involved directly.},\n\turldate = {2019-02-14},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {Conference} on {Interaction} {Design} and {Children}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Frauenberger, Christopher and Makhaeva, Julia and Spiel, Katharina},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {event-place: Stanford, California, USA},\n\tkeywords = {autism, children},\n\tpages = {743--748},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n With this workshop we aim to bring together researchers who explore interactive technologies in the context of autistic children. At a point at which considerable effort has been invested in this area and results are promising, but hardly conclusively convincing, we argue that it is time to critically reflect on our work. We do this by posing three provocative questions: 1) Are we trying to do the right thing? 2) Is it working? and 3) Does it matter? With all three questions we aim to kick-start a debate about the goals and intentions with which research is done in this area, how we define that technology is successful and how we can ensure that our research has real-world impact beyond the people involved directly.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frauenberger, C.; Makhaeva, J.; and Spiel, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, of
IDC '17, pages 39–49, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{frauenberger_blending_2017,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{IDC} '17},\n\ttitle = {Blending {Methods}: {Developing} {Participatory} {Design} {Sessions} for {Autistic} {Children}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4503-4921-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Blending {Methods}},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N41812},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3078072.3079727},\n\tabstract = {Over the past two years, we have engaged autistic children in a participatory design (PD) process to create their own, individual smart object. In this paper, we reflect on our methodological choices and how these came about. Describing the design process with one of our participants as a case, we show how we developed participatory activities by combining, blending, re-interpreting and adapting techniques and tools from a pool of methods on the basis of the characteristics of the child, our own skills as designers and the history and context of our collaboration. Reflecting on this practice retrospectively, we seek to make two contributions: firstly, we distill a repertoire of methodological building blocks which draw on our experience of co-designing with autistic children. Secondly, we present a visual tool that captures the process by which we combined, blended and interpreted these building blocks into coherent design activities with a view to provide systematic guidance for future work. While the work presented here is set within the context of designing with autistic children, we argue that the underlying approach can be applicable and useful in a wider co-design context.},\n\turldate = {2017-06-29},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2017 {Conference} on {Interaction} {Design} and {Children}},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Frauenberger, Christopher and Makhaeva, Julia and Spiel, Katharina},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {autism, children, participatory design},\n\tpages = {39--49},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Over the past two years, we have engaged autistic children in a participatory design (PD) process to create their own, individual smart object. In this paper, we reflect on our methodological choices and how these came about. Describing the design process with one of our participants as a case, we show how we developed participatory activities by combining, blending, re-interpreting and adapting techniques and tools from a pool of methods on the basis of the characteristics of the child, our own skills as designers and the history and context of our collaboration. Reflecting on this practice retrospectively, we seek to make two contributions: firstly, we distill a repertoire of methodological building blocks which draw on our experience of co-designing with autistic children. Secondly, we present a visual tool that captures the process by which we combined, blended and interpreted these building blocks into coherent design activities with a view to provide systematic guidance for future work. While the work presented here is set within the context of designing with autistic children, we argue that the underlying approach can be applicable and useful in a wider co-design context.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Demo Hour.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bengler, B.; Martin, F.; Bryan-Kinns, N.; Frauenberger, C.; Makhaeva, J.; Spiel, K.; Vishkaie, R.; and Jones, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
interactions, 25(1): 8–11. December 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bengler_demo_2017,\n\ttitle = {Demo {Hour}},\n\tvolume = {25},\n\tissn = {1072-5520},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N42783},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3162013},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2018-01-10},\n\tjournal = {interactions},\n\tauthor = {Bengler, Ben and Martin, Fiore and Bryan-Kinns, Nick and Frauenberger, Christopher and Makhaeva, Julia and Spiel, Katharina and Vishkaie, Rojin and Jones, Lee},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {8--11},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Special Topic: Taking Action in a Changing World.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Light, A.; Frauenberger, C.; Preece, J.; Strohmeier, P.; and Ferrario, M. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
interactions, 25(1): 34–45. December 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{light_special_2017,\n\ttitle = {Special {Topic}: {Taking} {Action} in a {Changing} {World}},\n\tvolume = {25},\n\tissn = {1072-5520},\n\tshorttitle = {Special {Topic}},\n\turl = {http://dl.acm.org/authorize?N42782},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3169128},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2018-01-10},\n\tjournal = {interactions},\n\tauthor = {Light, Ann and Frauenberger, Chris and Preece, Jennifer and Strohmeier, Paul and Ferrario, Maria Angela},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {34--45},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Experiences of autistic children with technologies.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spiel, K.; Frauenberger, C.; and Fitzpatrick, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11: 50–61. January 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{spiel_experiences_2017,\n\tseries = {Designing with and for {Children} with {Special} {Needs}},\n\ttitle = {Experiences of autistic children with technologies},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tissn = {2212-8689},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868916300174},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.007},\n\tabstract = {Experiences of autistic children with technology are often assessed by neurotypical researchers, although their perceptual and sense-making processes differ fundamentally. Empathy, as the underlying mechanism to infer another person’s experience, is of limited use in cases where life-worlds radically diverge. The same holds true for indirect assessments, e.g., through contextual information, observations, or parent or carer interviews. It is poorly defined what constitutes a positive experience for autistic children and how an allistic society can meet them halfway in establishing one. Using Actor-Network-Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis we present our methodological concept of experience, which emphasises relational as well as interactional aspects in constructing experience, while staying open for multiple interpretations and remaining critical towards its assessments. We apply our framework in a case study within OutsideTheBox, sampling multiple data sources from multiple viewpoints, and demonstrate how it can yield insightful results about the experiences that autistic children have with technologies, going beyond what can be inferred via proxy or empathy.},\n\turldate = {2017-03-03},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction},\n\tauthor = {Spiel, Katharina and Frauenberger, Christopher and Fitzpatrick, Geraldine},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Autism, Experience, Neurodiversity, Technology evaluation},\n\tpages = {50--61},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Experiences of autistic children with technology are often assessed by neurotypical researchers, although their perceptual and sense-making processes differ fundamentally. Empathy, as the underlying mechanism to infer another person’s experience, is of limited use in cases where life-worlds radically diverge. The same holds true for indirect assessments, e.g., through contextual information, observations, or parent or carer interviews. It is poorly defined what constitutes a positive experience for autistic children and how an allistic society can meet them halfway in establishing one. Using Actor-Network-Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis we present our methodological concept of experience, which emphasises relational as well as interactional aspects in constructing experience, while staying open for multiple interpretations and remaining critical towards its assessments. We apply our framework in a case study within OutsideTheBox, sampling multiple data sources from multiple viewpoints, and demonstrate how it can yield insightful results about the experiences that autistic children have with technologies, going beyond what can be inferred via proxy or empathy.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n In-Action Ethics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frauenberger, C.; Rauhala, M.; and Fitzpatrick, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Interacting with Computers, 29(2): 220–236. March 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{frauenberger_-action_2017,\n\ttitle = {In-{Action} {Ethics}},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tissn = {0953-5438},\n\turl = {https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-abstract/29/2/220/2607838/In-Action-Ethics},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/iwc/iww024},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2017-02-28},\n\tjournal = {Interacting with Computers},\n\tauthor = {Frauenberger, Christopher and Rauhala, Marjo and Fitzpatrick, Geraldine},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {220--236},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n