\n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n \n Li, M.; Walk, R.; Roka-Moiia, Y.; Sheriff, J.; Bluestein, D.; Barth, E.; and Slepian, M.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Circulatory Loop Design and Components Introduce Artifacts Impacting In-Vitro Evaluation of Ventricular Assist Device Thrombogenicity: A Call for Caution.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Artif Organs, 44: E226-E237. 2019.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 7 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a109,\r\n author = {Li, M. and Walk, R. and Roka-Moiia, Y. and Sheriff, J. and Bluestein, D. and Barth, E.J. and Slepian, M.J.},\r\n year = {2019},\r\n title = {Circulatory Loop Design and Components Introduce Artifacts Impacting In-Vitro Evaluation of Ventricular Assist Device Thrombogenicity: A Call for Caution},\r\n journal = {Artif Organs},\r\n volume = {44},\r\n issue = {6},\r\n pages = {E226-E237},\r\n url_Link ={https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13626},\r\n project = {activation; lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Apostoli, A.; Bianchi, V.; Bono, N.; Dimasi, A.; Ammann, K.; Roka-Moiia, Y.; Montisci, A.; Sheriff, J.; Bluestein, D.; Fiore, G.; Pappalardo, F.; Candiani, G.; Redaelli, A.; Slepian, M.; and Consolo, F.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Prothrombotic Activity of Cytokine-Activated Endothelial Cells and Shear-Activated Platelets in the Setting of Ventricular Assist Device Support.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
J Heart Lung Transplant., 38: 658-667. 2019.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a78,\r\n author = {Apostoli, A. and Bianchi, V. and Bono, N. and Dimasi, A. and Ammann, K.R. and Roka-Moiia, Y. and Montisci, A. and Sheriff, J. and Bluestein, D. and Fiore, G.B. and Pappalardo, F. and Candiani, G. and Redaelli, A. and Slepian, M.J. and Consolo, F.},\r\n year = {2019},\r\n title = {Prothrombotic Activity of Cytokine-Activated Endothelial Cells and Shear-Activated Platelets in the Setting of Ventricular Assist Device Support},\r\n journal = {J Heart Lung Transplant.},\r\n volume = {38},\r\n pages = {658-667},\r\n url_Link ={https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02012-y},\r\n project = {activation; lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Chiu, W.; Tran, P.; Khalpey, Z.; Lee, E.; Woo, Y.; Slepian, M.; and Bluestein, D.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: An In Silico Predictor of In Vitro and In Vivo Ventricular Assist Device.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Scientific Reports, 9: 2946. 2019.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a73,\r\n author = {Chiu, W-C and Tran, P.L. and Khalpey, Z. and Lee, E. and Woo, Y-R and Slepian, M.J. and Bluestein, D.},\r\n year = {2019},\r\n title = {Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: An In Silico Predictor of In Vitro and In Vivo Ventricular Assist Device},\r\n journal = {Scientific Reports},\r\n volume = {9: 2946},\r\n url_Link ={https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39897-6},\r\n project = {lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Selmi, M.; Chiu, W.; Keshav, V.; Melisurgo, G. B.; Mahr, C.; Aliseda, A.; Votta, E.; Redaelli, A.; Slepian, M.; Bluestein, D.; Pappalardo, F.; and Consolo, F.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Blood damage in Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pump thrombosis or system thrombosis?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 42: 113-124. 2018.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a54,\r\n author = {Selmi, M. and Chiu, W.C. and Keshav, V. and Melisurgo, G. Beckman, J.A. and Mahr, C. and Aliseda, A. and Votta, E. and Redaelli, A. and Slepian, M.J. and Bluestein, D. and Pappalardo, F. and Consolo, F.},\r\n year = {2018},\r\n title = {Blood damage in Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pump thrombosis or system thrombosis?},\r\n journal = {The International Journal of Artificial Organs},\r\n volume = {42},\r\n pages = {113-124},\r\n url_Link ={https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0391398818806162?journalCode=jaoa},\r\n project = {lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Chiu, W. C.; Alemu, Y.; McLarty, A.; Einav, S.; Slepian, M. J.; and Bluestein, D.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Configurations Impact Overall Mechanical Circulatory Support System Thrombogenic Potential.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
ASAIO J., 63: 285-292. 2017.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Article{a13,\r\n author = {Chiu, W-. C. and Alemu, Y. and McLarty, A. and Einav, S. and Slepian, M. J. and Bluestein, D.},\r\n title = {Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Configurations Impact Overall Mechanical Circulatory Support System Thrombogenic Potential},\r\n journal = {ASAIO J.},\r\n year = {2017},\r\n volume = {63},\r\n pages = {285-292},\r\n abstract = {Ventricular assist devices (VADs) became in recent years the standard of care therapy for advanced heart failure with hemodynamic compromise. With the steadily growing population of device recipients, various postimplant complications have been reported, mostly associated with the hypershear generated by VADs that enhance their thrombogenicity by activating platelets. Although VAD design optimization can significantly improve its thromboresistance, the implanted VAD need to be evaluated as part of a system. Several clinical studies indicated that variability in implantation configurations may contribute to the overall system thrombogenicity. Numerical simulations were conducted in the HeartAssist 5 (HA5) and HeartMate II (HMII) VADs in the following implantation configurations: 1) inflow cannula angles: 115° and 140° (HA5); 2) three VAD circumferential orientations: 0°, 30°, and 60° (HA5 and HMII); and 3) 60° and 90° outflow graft anastomotic angles with respect to the ascending aorta (HA5). The stress accumulation of the platelets was calculated along flow trajectories and collapsed into a probability density function, representing the “thrombogenic footprint” of each configuration—a proxy to its thrombogenic potential (TP). The 140° HA5 cannula generated lower TP independent of the circumferential orientation of the VAD. Sixty-degree orientation generated the lowest TP for the HA5 versus 0° for the HMII. An anastomotic angle of 60° resulted in lower TP for HA5. These results demonstrate that optimizing the implantation configuration reduces the overall system TP. Thromboresistance can be enhanced by combining VAD design optimization with the surgical implantation configurations for achieving better clinical outcomes of implanted VADs.},\r\n url_Link = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000488},\r\n project = {lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Ventricular assist devices (VADs) became in recent years the standard of care therapy for advanced heart failure with hemodynamic compromise. With the steadily growing population of device recipients, various postimplant complications have been reported, mostly associated with the hypershear generated by VADs that enhance their thrombogenicity by activating platelets. Although VAD design optimization can significantly improve its thromboresistance, the implanted VAD need to be evaluated as part of a system. Several clinical studies indicated that variability in implantation configurations may contribute to the overall system thrombogenicity. Numerical simulations were conducted in the HeartAssist 5 (HA5) and HeartMate II (HMII) VADs in the following implantation configurations: 1) inflow cannula angles: 115° and 140° (HA5); 2) three VAD circumferential orientations: 0°, 30°, and 60° (HA5 and HMII); and 3) 60° and 90° outflow graft anastomotic angles with respect to the ascending aorta (HA5). The stress accumulation of the platelets was calculated along flow trajectories and collapsed into a probability density function, representing the “thrombogenic footprint” of each configuration—a proxy to its thrombogenic potential (TP). The 140° HA5 cannula generated lower TP independent of the circumferential orientation of the VAD. Sixty-degree orientation generated the lowest TP for the HA5 versus 0° for the HMII. An anastomotic angle of 60° resulted in lower TP for HA5. These results demonstrate that optimizing the implantation configuration reduces the overall system TP. Thromboresistance can be enhanced by combining VAD design optimization with the surgical implantation configurations for achieving better clinical outcomes of implanted VADs.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Chiu, W. C.; Girdhar, G.; Xenos, M.; Alemu, Y.; Soares, J. S.; Einav, S.; Slepian, M. J.; and Bluestein, D.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Thromboresistance Comparison of the HeartMate II Ventricular Assist Device with Device Thrombogenicity Emulation - optimized HeartAssist 5 VAD.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
J. Biomech. Eng, 136: 021014. 2014.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{z23,\r\n author = {Chiu, W-. C. and Girdhar, G. and Xenos, M. and Alemu, Y. and Soares, J. S. and Einav, S. and Slepian, M. J. and Bluestein, D.},\r\n year = {2014},\r\n title = {Thromboresistance Comparison of the HeartMate II Ventricular Assist Device with Device Thrombogenicity Emulation - optimized HeartAssist 5 VAD},\r\n journal = {J. Biomech. Eng},\r\n volume = {136},\r\n issue = {2},\r\n pages = {021014},\r\n url_Link = {https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026254},\r\n abstract = {Approximately 7.5 x 106 patients in the US currently suffer from end-stage heart failure. The FDA has recently approved the designations of the Thoratec HeartMate II ventricular assist device (VAD) for both bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy (DT) due to its mechanical durability and improved hemodynamics. However, incidence of pump thrombosis and thromboembolic events remains high, and the life-long complex pharmacological regimens are mandatory in its VAD recipients. We have previously successfully applied our device thrombogenicity emulation (DTE) methodology for optimizing device thromboresistance to the Micromed Debakey VAD, and demonstrated that optimizing device features implicated in exposing blood to elevated shear stresses and exposure times significantly reduces shear-induced platelet activation and significantly improves the device thromboresistance. In the present study, we compared the thrombogenicity of the FDA-approved HeartMate II VAD with the DTE-optimized Debakey VAD (now labeled HeartAssist 5). With quantitative probability density functions of the stress accumulation along large number of platelet trajectories within each device which were extracted from numerical flow simulations in each device, and through measurements of platelet activation rates in recirculation flow loops, we specifically show that: (a) Platelets flowing through the HeartAssist 5 are exposed to significantly lower stress accumulation that lead to platelet activation than the HeartMate II, especially at the impeller-shroud gap regions (b) Thrombus formation patterns observed in the HeartMate II are absent in the HeartAssist 5 (c) Platelet activation rates (PAR) measured in vitro with the VADs mounted in recirculation flow-loops show a 2.5-fold significantly higher PAR value for the HeartMate II. This head to head thrombogenic performance comparative study of the two VADs, one optimized with the DTE methodology and one FDA-approved, demonstrates the efficacy of the DTE methodology for drastically reducing the device thrombogenic potential, validating the need for a robust in silico/in vitro optimization methodology for improving cardiovascular devices thromboresistance.},\r\n project = {lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers}\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Approximately 7.5 x 106 patients in the US currently suffer from end-stage heart failure. The FDA has recently approved the designations of the Thoratec HeartMate II ventricular assist device (VAD) for both bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy (DT) due to its mechanical durability and improved hemodynamics. However, incidence of pump thrombosis and thromboembolic events remains high, and the life-long complex pharmacological regimens are mandatory in its VAD recipients. We have previously successfully applied our device thrombogenicity emulation (DTE) methodology for optimizing device thromboresistance to the Micromed Debakey VAD, and demonstrated that optimizing device features implicated in exposing blood to elevated shear stresses and exposure times significantly reduces shear-induced platelet activation and significantly improves the device thromboresistance. In the present study, we compared the thrombogenicity of the FDA-approved HeartMate II VAD with the DTE-optimized Debakey VAD (now labeled HeartAssist 5). With quantitative probability density functions of the stress accumulation along large number of platelet trajectories within each device which were extracted from numerical flow simulations in each device, and through measurements of platelet activation rates in recirculation flow loops, we specifically show that: (a) Platelets flowing through the HeartAssist 5 are exposed to significantly lower stress accumulation that lead to platelet activation than the HeartMate II, especially at the impeller-shroud gap regions (b) Thrombus formation patterns observed in the HeartMate II are absent in the HeartAssist 5 (c) Platelet activation rates (PAR) measured in vitro with the VADs mounted in recirculation flow-loops show a 2.5-fold significantly higher PAR value for the HeartMate II. This head to head thrombogenic performance comparative study of the two VADs, one optimized with the DTE methodology and one FDA-approved, demonstrates the efficacy of the DTE methodology for drastically reducing the device thrombogenic potential, validating the need for a robust in silico/in vitro optimization methodology for improving cardiovascular devices thromboresistance.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Bluestein, D.; Girdhar, G.; Einav, S.; and Slepian, M. J.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Device thrombogenicity emulation: A novel methodology for optimizing the thromboresistance of cardiovascular devices.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n
J. Biomech, 46: 338-344. Erratum in: 46(7):1413. 2013.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n paper\n \n \n \n link\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{z34,\r\n author = {Bluestein, D. and Girdhar, G. and Einav, S. and Slepian, M. J.},\r\n year = {2013},\r\n title = {Device thrombogenicity emulation: A novel methodology for optimizing the thromboresistance of cardiovascular devices},\r\n journal = {J. Biomech},\r\n volume = {46},\r\n issue = {2},\r\n pages = {338-344. Erratum in: 46(7):1413},\r\n url_Paper={/labs/dbluestein/PDF/Bluestein_2013_DTE_thromboresistance.pdf},\r\n url_Link = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.033},\r\n abstract = {Thrombotic complications with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices remain a critical limitation to their long-term use. Device-induced shear forces may enhance the thrombotic potential of MCS devices through chronic activation of platelets, with a known dose-time response of the platelets to the accumulated stress experienced while flowing through the device-mandating complex, lifelong anticoagulation therapy. To enhance the thromboresistance of these devices for facilitating their long-term use, a universal predictive methodology entitled device thrombogenicity emulation (DTE) was developed. DTE is aimed at optimizing the thromboresistance of any MCS device. It is designed to test device-mediated thrombogenicity, coupled with virtual design modifications, in an iterative approach. This disruptive technology combines in silico numerical simulations with in vitro measurements, by correlating device hemodynamics with platelet activity coagulation markers-before and after iterative design modifications aimed at achieving optimized thrombogenic performance. The design changes are first tested in the numerical domain, and the resultant device conditions are then emulated in a hemodynamic shearing device (HSD) in which platelet activity is measured under device emulated conditions. As such, DTE can be easily incorporated during the device research and development phase-achieving minimization of the device thrombogenicity before prototypes are built and tested thereby reducing the ultimate cost of preclinical and clinical trials. The robust capability of this predictive technology is demonstrated here in various MCS devices. The presented examples indicate the potential of DTE for reducing device thrombogenicity to a level that may obviate or significantly reduce the extent of anticoagulation currently mandated for patients implanted with MCS devices for safe long-term clinical use.},\r\n project = {lvad},\r\n type = {1. Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers}\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Thrombotic complications with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices remain a critical limitation to their long-term use. Device-induced shear forces may enhance the thrombotic potential of MCS devices through chronic activation of platelets, with a known dose-time response of the platelets to the accumulated stress experienced while flowing through the device-mandating complex, lifelong anticoagulation therapy. To enhance the thromboresistance of these devices for facilitating their long-term use, a universal predictive methodology entitled device thrombogenicity emulation (DTE) was developed. DTE is aimed at optimizing the thromboresistance of any MCS device. It is designed to test device-mediated thrombogenicity, coupled with virtual design modifications, in an iterative approach. This disruptive technology combines in silico numerical simulations with in vitro measurements, by correlating device hemodynamics with platelet activity coagulation markers-before and after iterative design modifications aimed at achieving optimized thrombogenic performance. The design changes are first tested in the numerical domain, and the resultant device conditions are then emulated in a hemodynamic shearing device (HSD) in which platelet activity is measured under device emulated conditions. As such, DTE can be easily incorporated during the device research and development phase-achieving minimization of the device thrombogenicity before prototypes are built and tested thereby reducing the ultimate cost of preclinical and clinical trials. The robust capability of this predictive technology is demonstrated here in various MCS devices. The presented examples indicate the potential of DTE for reducing device thrombogenicity to a level that may obviate or significantly reduce the extent of anticoagulation currently mandated for patients implanted with MCS devices for safe long-term clinical use.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n