var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F176620%2Fitems%3Fkey%3Dz2N13MD1kDZlUp4cgxt8V6EF%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1&[authorFirst]=[1]&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F176620%2Fitems%3Fkey%3Dz2N13MD1kDZlUp4cgxt8V6EF%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1&[authorFirst]=[1]\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F176620%2Fitems%3Fkey%3Dz2N13MD1kDZlUp4cgxt8V6EF%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1&[authorFirst]=[1]\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
  2. \n
  3. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
  4. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2024\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Den Menschen dem Menschen erklären. Deskriptivität und Normativität in den christlichen Anthropologien von Laktanz, Gregor von Nyssa und Nemesios von Emesa.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n De Brasi, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Monothéismes et PhilosophieBrepols, Turnhout, 2024.\n OCLC: 1317682824\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{de_brasi_den_2024,\n\taddress = {Turnhout},\n\tseries = {Monothéismes et {Philosophie}},\n\ttitle = {Den {Menschen} dem {Menschen} erklären. {Deskriptivität} und {Normativität} in den christlichen {Anthropologien} von {Laktanz}, {Gregor} von {Nyssa} und {Nemesios} von {Emesa}},\n\tisbn = {978-2-503-59910-6},\n\tabstract = {Den Menschen dem Menschen erklären' stellt die erste, umfassende Vergleichsanalyse von drei anthropologischen Traktaten aus dem vierten Jahrhundert n. Chr. dar: Laktanzens 'De opificio Dei', Gregor von Nyssas 'De hominis opificio' und Nemesios von Emesas 'De natura hominis'. Diese Texte wurden oft als das jeweils erste Beispiel christlicher Anthropologie bezeichnet, doch ebenso oft waren die Kriterien, die zu diesem Urteil führten, unklar. Das Buch hinterfragt diese Einschätzungen und widmet sich der Analyse der literarischen Form und des philosophisch-theologischen Inhalts dieser Schriften. Es zeichnet die Intentionen, welche die drei Autoren beim Verfassen der Traktate verfolgten, nach. Es analysiert die philosophischen Grundgedanken, die diesen Beispielen christlicher Anthropologie zugrunde liegen. Es stellt dar, wie in den drei Texten eine deskriptive und eine normative Anthropologie miteinander verwoben werden, um ein protreptisch-paränetisches Ziel zu erreichen. Diese protreptische-paränetische Absicht, die auch - und insbesondere - eine überwiegend positive Einstellung zur menschlichen Körperlichkeit mit sich bringt, wird als gemeinsames Charakteristikum der drei Traktate identifiziert und als ein mögliches Hauptattribut christlicher Anthropologie erkannt. So will 'Den Menschen dem Menschen erklären' eine Diskussion anstoßen, ob das anthropologische Traktat eine spezifisch christliche literarische Gattung darstellen könnte},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tnumber = {32},\n\tpublisher = {Brepols},\n\tauthor = {De Brasi, Diego},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {OCLC: 1317682824},\n\tkeywords = {Anthropologie, Anthropology, Lactance, Lactantius, Nemesius of Emesa, Némésius d'Émèse, Op. hom.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Den Menschen dem Menschen erklären' stellt die erste, umfassende Vergleichsanalyse von drei anthropologischen Traktaten aus dem vierten Jahrhundert n. Chr. dar: Laktanzens 'De opificio Dei', Gregor von Nyssas 'De hominis opificio' und Nemesios von Emesas 'De natura hominis'. Diese Texte wurden oft als das jeweils erste Beispiel christlicher Anthropologie bezeichnet, doch ebenso oft waren die Kriterien, die zu diesem Urteil führten, unklar. Das Buch hinterfragt diese Einschätzungen und widmet sich der Analyse der literarischen Form und des philosophisch-theologischen Inhalts dieser Schriften. Es zeichnet die Intentionen, welche die drei Autoren beim Verfassen der Traktate verfolgten, nach. Es analysiert die philosophischen Grundgedanken, die diesen Beispielen christlicher Anthropologie zugrunde liegen. Es stellt dar, wie in den drei Texten eine deskriptive und eine normative Anthropologie miteinander verwoben werden, um ein protreptisch-paränetisches Ziel zu erreichen. Diese protreptische-paränetische Absicht, die auch - und insbesondere - eine überwiegend positive Einstellung zur menschlichen Körperlichkeit mit sich bringt, wird als gemeinsames Charakteristikum der drei Traktate identifiziert und als ein mögliches Hauptattribut christlicher Anthropologie erkannt. So will 'Den Menschen dem Menschen erklären' eine Diskussion anstoßen, ob das anthropologische Traktat eine spezifisch christliche literarische Gattung darstellen könnte\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La réception nysséenne du \"Connais-toi toi-même\".\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mbengue, M. B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique, 497: 69–99. 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{mbengue_reception_2024,\n\ttitle = {La réception nysséenne du "{Connais}-toi toi-même"},\n\tvolume = {497},\n\tjournal = {Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique},\n\tauthor = {Mbengue, Marcel Birame},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tkeywords = {Ancient Philosophy, Connaissance de soi, Philosophie antique, Self-knowledge},\n\tpages = {69--99},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n L'intellect et ses opérations dans le traité De la création de l'homme de Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mueller-Jourdan, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique, 497: 37–68. 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{mueller-jourdan_intellect_2024,\n\ttitle = {L'intellect et ses opérations dans le traité {De} la création de l'homme de {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tvolume = {497},\n\tjournal = {Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique},\n\tauthor = {Mueller-Jourdan, Pascal},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tkeywords = {Ancient Philosophy, Intellect, Op. hom., Philosophie antique},\n\tpages = {37--68},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa, Augustine of Hippo and the Filioque. By Chungman Lee. (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, 169.) Pp. xiv + 366. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2021. €127. 978 90 04 46515 2; 0920 623X.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Edwards, M. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 75(2): 365–366. April 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GregoryPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{edwards_gregory_2024,\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, {Augustine} of {Hippo} and the {Filioque}. {By} {Chungman} {Lee}. ({Supplements} to {Vigiliae} {Christianae}, 169.) {Pp}. xiv + 366. {Leiden}–{Boston}: {Brill}, 2021. €127. 978 90 04 46515 2; 0920 {623X}},\n\tvolume = {75},\n\tissn = {0022-0469, 1469-7637},\n\tshorttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, {Augustine} of {Hippo} and the {Filioque}. {By} {Chungman} {Lee}. ({Supplements} to {Vigiliae} {Christianae}, 169.) {Pp}. xiv + 366. {Leiden}–{Boston}},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/abs/gregory-of-nyssa-augustine-of-hippo-and-the-filioque-by-chungman-lee-supplements-to-vigiliae-christianae-169-pp-xiv-366-leidenboston-brill-2021-127-978-90-04-46515-2-0920-623x/2752454CA8CD0A83ED8E88CA648829FE?utm_source=SFMC&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Article&utm_campaign=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Issues&WT.mc_id=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Issues},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0022046924000162},\n\tabstract = {//static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn\\%3Acambridge.org\\%3Aid\\%3Aarticle\\%3AS0022046924000162/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S0022046924000162a.jpg},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-04-05},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Ecclesiastical History},\n\tauthor = {Edwards, M. J.},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tpages = {365--366},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n //static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022046924000162/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S0022046924000162a.jpg\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Critique de texte et interprétations d’ouvrages de Basile de Césarée ; Remarques sur les textes d’Eunome et de ses adversaires Basile et Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Alexanderson, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhället i Göteborg. HumanioraKungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhället i Göteborg, Göteborg, 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{alexanderson_critique_2024,\n\taddress = {Göteborg},\n\tseries = {Kungliga {Vetenskaps}- och {Vitterhets}-{Samhället} i {Göteborg}. {Humaniora}},\n\ttitle = {Critique de texte et interprétations d’ouvrages de {Basile} de {Césarée} ; {Remarques} sur les textes d’{Eunome} et de ses adversaires {Basile} et {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tisbn = {978-91-98924-0-0},\n\tnumber = {54},\n\tpublisher = {Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhället i Göteborg},\n\tauthor = {Alexanderson, Bengt},\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Isidorus C. Katsos, The Metaphysics of Light in the Hexaemeral Literature: From Philo of Alexandria to Gregory of Nyssa (Oxford, 2023).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Riesgo, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval, 30(2): 130–133. March 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IsidorusPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{riesgo_isidorus_2024,\n\ttitle = {Isidorus {C}. {Katsos}, {The} {Metaphysics} of {Light} in the {Hexaemeral} {Literature}: {From} {Philo} of {Alexandria} to {Gregory} of {Nyssa} ({Oxford}, 2023)},\n\tvolume = {30},\n\tissn = {2530-7878, 1133-0902},\n\tshorttitle = {Isidorus {C}. {Katsos}, {The} {Metaphysics} of {Light} in the {Hexaemeral} {Literature}},\n\turl = {https://journals.uco.es/refime/article/view/16309},\n\tdoi = {10.21071/refime.v30i2.16309},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-03-09},\n\tjournal = {Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval},\n\tauthor = {Riesgo, Gustavo},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tpages = {130--133},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Imitations of Infinity: Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis by Michael A. Motia (review).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maspero, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Catholic Historical Review, 110(1): 122–124. 2024.\n Publisher: The Catholic University of America Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ImitationsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{maspero_imitations_2024,\n\ttitle = {Imitations of {Infinity}: {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and the {Transformation} of {Mimesis} by {Michael} {A}. {Motia} (review)},\n\tvolume = {110},\n\tissn = {1534-0708},\n\tshorttitle = {Imitations of {Infinity}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/16/article/921702},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2024-03-09},\n\tjournal = {The Catholic Historical Review},\n\tauthor = {Maspero, Giulio},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Publisher: The Catholic University of America Press},\n\tpages = {122--124},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Cantique des cantiques. Tome II, Homélies VI-X.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Canévet, M.; and Vinel, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Sources chrétiennesÉditions du Cerf, Paris, 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{canevet_gregoire_2024,\n\taddress = {Paris},\n\tseries = {Sources chrétiennes},\n\ttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse}, {Homélies} sur le {Cantique} des cantiques. {Tome} {II}, {Homélies} {VI}-{X}},\n\tisbn = {978-2-204-15753-7},\n\tnumber = {644},\n\tpublisher = {Éditions du Cerf},\n\tauthor = {Canévet, Mariette and Vinel, Françoise},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tkeywords = {Cant.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa: On the Human Image of God. Edited and translated by John Behr.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Renberg, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Journal of Theological Studies,flae010. February 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GregoryPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{renberg_gregory_2024,\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}: {On} the {Human} {Image} of {God}. {Edited} and translated by {John} {Behr}},\n\tissn = {0022-5185},\n\tshorttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flae010},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/jts/flae010},\n\tabstract = {John Behr has consistently pushed scholars of the early church to reconsider their treatment of ancient theologians, such as Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and Origen of Alexandria, through new critical editions and careful translations. His translation of On the Human Image of God, similarly, seeks to rehabilitate the theological anthropology of Gregory of Nyssa, especially by challenging common misreadings of his treatment of gendered bodies. Behr’s insightful introduction and excellent translation are a triumph, a gift to those interested in the theology of Gregory of Nyssa and of the body.},\n\turldate = {2024-02-29},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Theological Studies},\n\tauthor = {Renberg, Adam},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tpages = {flae010},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n John Behr has consistently pushed scholars of the early church to reconsider their treatment of ancient theologians, such as Diodore of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and Origen of Alexandria, through new critical editions and careful translations. His translation of On the Human Image of God, similarly, seeks to rehabilitate the theological anthropology of Gregory of Nyssa, especially by challenging common misreadings of his treatment of gendered bodies. Behr’s insightful introduction and excellent translation are a triumph, a gift to those interested in the theology of Gregory of Nyssa and of the body.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Christological Problem of Epectasy.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Walker-Lenow, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n International Journal of Systematic Theology, 26(1): 3–24. 2024.\n _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijst.12641\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{walker-lenow_christological_2024,\n\ttitle = {A {Christological} {Problem} of {Epectasy}},\n\tvolume = {26},\n\tcopyright = {© 2023 John Wiley \\& Sons Ltd.},\n\tissn = {1468-2400},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijst.12641},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/ijst.12641},\n\tabstract = {This paper argues that the theological and anthropological assumptions underlying Gregory of Nyssa's doctrine of epectasy, an understanding of our eschatological state as one of perpetual growth in the love of God, mandate a christological conclusion that many will find undesirable: there will come a time in the course of eternal life at which each of the redeemed come to love the Father more than Christ did on the cross as he offered his life for the life of the world, and more than Christ did on Easter Sunday as he conquered death.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2024-01-17},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of Systematic Theology},\n\tauthor = {Walker-Lenow, Joseph},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {\\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijst.12641},\n\tkeywords = {Christologie, Christology, Epectase, Epektasis, Eschatologie, Eschatology},\n\tpages = {3--24},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper argues that the theological and anthropological assumptions underlying Gregory of Nyssa's doctrine of epectasy, an understanding of our eschatological state as one of perpetual growth in the love of God, mandate a christological conclusion that many will find undesirable: there will come a time in the course of eternal life at which each of the redeemed come to love the Father more than Christ did on the cross as he offered his life for the life of the world, and more than Christ did on Easter Sunday as he conquered death.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2023\n \n \n (20)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa, Augustine of Hippo, and the Filioque. By Chungman Lee. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 169. Leiden: Brill, 2021. xiii + 366. $162.00 cloth.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heintz, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Church History, 92(4): 942–943. December 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GregoryPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{heintz_gregory_2023,\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, {Augustine} of {Hippo}, and the {Filioque}. {By} {Chungman} {Lee}. {Supplements} to {Vigiliae} {Christianae} 169. {Leiden}: {Brill}, 2021. xiii + 366. \\$162.00 cloth.},\n\tvolume = {92},\n\tissn = {0009-6407, 1755-2613},\n\tshorttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, {Augustine} of {Hippo}, and the {Filioque}. {By} {Chungman} {Lee}. {Supplements} to {Vigiliae} {Christianae} 169. {Leiden}},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/abs/gregory-of-nyssa-augustine-of-hippo-and-the-filioque-by-chungman-lee-supplements-to-vigiliae-christianae-169-leiden-brill-2021-xiii-366-16200-cloth/3709BC56FBD93886970BAFB0080FA213},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0009640723002998},\n\tabstract = {//static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn\\%3Acambridge.org\\%3Aid\\%3Aarticle\\%3AS0009640723002998/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S0009640723002998a.jpg},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2024-03-20},\n\tjournal = {Church History},\n\tauthor = {Heintz, Michael},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {942--943},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n //static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009640723002998/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S0009640723002998a.jpg\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Devil’s Ransom and Christology in Origen and the Cappadocians.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heinze, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Journal of Theological Studies, 74(2): 636–672. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{heinze_devils_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Devil}’s {Ransom} and {Christology} in {Origen} and the {Cappadocians}},\n\tvolume = {74},\n\tissn = {0022-5185},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flad048},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/jts/flad048},\n\tabstract = {This article identifies a relationship between third- and fourth-century Christology and the idea that Christ’s blood ransomed sinners from the devil. The thesis is that the ‘devil’s ransom’ was a natural conclusion for patristic exegetes but that those who accepted it had to navigate around the outrageous possibility that Christ’s divinity had been offered to the devil. Origen, depending on what some would call a dualistic Christology, solved the problem by saying that the ransom price (Christ’s blood or soul) had not included his divinity; but Gregory of Nazianzus, for whom Christ’s blood was in some real sense ‘the blood of God’, could not say this, which is one of the reasons that he rejected the whole idea of a ransom to the devil. In contrast, Gregory of Nyssa’s emphasis on the concealment of Christ’s divinity within the ransom prevented it from having been part of the agreed-upon price and so saved the devil’s ransom from scandal. This theological manoeuvring shows that the ransom stories should be read within a broader theological context. The recent scholarly recognition that the ransom is one among many colourful and sometimes incompatible soteriological metaphors should not lead us to ignore the degree to which patristic authors treated it with theological seriousness.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Theological Studies},\n\tauthor = {Heinze, Ky},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Devil, Diable, Origène},\n\tpages = {636--672},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article identifies a relationship between third- and fourth-century Christology and the idea that Christ’s blood ransomed sinners from the devil. The thesis is that the ‘devil’s ransom’ was a natural conclusion for patristic exegetes but that those who accepted it had to navigate around the outrageous possibility that Christ’s divinity had been offered to the devil. Origen, depending on what some would call a dualistic Christology, solved the problem by saying that the ransom price (Christ’s blood or soul) had not included his divinity; but Gregory of Nazianzus, for whom Christ’s blood was in some real sense ‘the blood of God’, could not say this, which is one of the reasons that he rejected the whole idea of a ransom to the devil. In contrast, Gregory of Nyssa’s emphasis on the concealment of Christ’s divinity within the ransom prevented it from having been part of the agreed-upon price and so saved the devil’s ransom from scandal. This theological manoeuvring shows that the ransom stories should be read within a broader theological context. The recent scholarly recognition that the ransom is one among many colourful and sometimes incompatible soteriological metaphors should not lead us to ignore the degree to which patristic authors treated it with theological seriousness.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Bulletin de théologie patristique (V).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Batllo, X.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue thomiste, 123: 713–738. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{batllo_bulletin_2023,\n\ttitle = {Bulletin de théologie patristique ({V})},\n\tvolume = {123},\n\tjournal = {Revue thomiste},\n\tauthor = {Batllo, Xavier},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {713--738},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Unity, Power and Energy of the Holy Trinity in the Theology of Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zhukovskyy, V.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Ceranea, 13. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{zhukovskyy_unity_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Unity}, {Power} and {Energy} of the {Holy} {Trinity} in the {Theology} of {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tdoi = {10.18778/2084-140X.13.32},\n\tjournal = {Studia Ceranea},\n\tauthor = {Zhukovskyy, Viktor},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Activity, Activité, Activités divines (énergies divines), Théologie trinitaire, Trinitarian Theology, Unity, Unité},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La réception de la Lettre 38 de Grégoire de Nysse dans la controverse trinitaire islamo-chrétienne au IX$^{\\textrm{e}}$ siècle: L'exemple d'Abū Rā'iṭah al-Takrītī.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maalouf, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue Théologique de Louvain, 54(3): 305–337. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{maalouf_reception_2023,\n\ttitle = {La réception de la \\textit{{Lettre} 38} de {Grégoire} de {Nysse} dans la controverse trinitaire islamo-chrétienne au {IX}$^{\\textrm{e}}$ siècle:  {L}'exemple d'{Abū} {Rā}'iṭah al-{Takrītī}},\n\tvolume = {54},\n\tshorttitle = {La réception de la \\textit{{Lettre} 38} de {Grégoire} de {Nysse} dans la controverse trinitaire islamo-chrétienne au {IXe} siècle},\n\tdoi = {10.2143/RTL.54.3.3292392},\n\tabstract = {Au début des controverses trinitaires islamo-chrétiennes, Abū Rā’iṭah al-Takrītī, théologien et philosophe jacobite au IXe siècle, répond, dans son},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Revue Théologique de Louvain},\n\tauthor = {Maalouf, Charbel},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Arabe, Arabic, Ep. 38, Eun., Reception, Réception, Théologie trinitaire, Trinitarian Theology},\n\tpages = {305--337},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Au début des controverses trinitaires islamo-chrétiennes, Abū Rā’iṭah al-Takrītī, théologien et philosophe jacobite au IXe siècle, répond, dans son\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity by Nathan D. Howard (review).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Flower, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Early Christian Studies, 31(4): 594–596. 2023.\n Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ChristianityPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{flower_christianity_2023,\n\ttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}: {The} {Cappadocian} {Fathers} and the {Rhetoric} of {Masculinity} by {Nathan} {D}. {Howard} (review)},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {1086-3184},\n\tshorttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/915045},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2023-12-20},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Early Christian Studies},\n\tauthor = {Flower, Richard},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press},\n\tpages = {594--596},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mirrors of the Divine: Late Ancient Christianity and the Vision of God by Emily R. Cain (review).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n King, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Early Christian Studies, 31(4): 590–592. 2023.\n Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"MirrorsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{king_mirrors_2023,\n\ttitle = {Mirrors of the {Divine}: {Late} {Ancient} {Christianity} and the {Vision} of {God} by {Emily} {R}. {Cain} (review)},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {1086-3184},\n\tshorttitle = {Mirrors of the {Divine}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/915043},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2023-12-20},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Early Christian Studies},\n\tauthor = {King, Derek},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press},\n\tpages = {590--592},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mirrors of the Divine: Late Ancient Christianity and the Vision of God.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cain, E. R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{cain_mirrors_2023,\n\taddress = {Oxford, New York},\n\ttitle = {Mirrors of the {Divine}: {Late} {Ancient} {Christianity} and the {Vision} of {God}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-19-766337-0},\n\tshorttitle = {Mirrors of the {Divine}},\n\tabstract = {Mirrors of the Divine brings into focus how four influential authors of the late ancient world—Tertullian of Carthage, Clement of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, and Augustine of Hippo—employ language of vision and of mirrors in their discursive struggles to construct Christian agency, identity, and epistemology. Early Christian authors described the vision of God through the Pauline verse 1 Corinthians 13:12: "For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face." Yet each author interpreted this verse differently, based on a diverse set of assumptions about how they understood seeing and mirrors to function: does vision occur by something leaving or entering the eye? Is one impacted by seeing or by being seen? Do mirrors offer trustworthy knowledge?Spanning the second through fourth centuries CE in both Eastern and Western Christianity, Mirrors of the Divine analyzes these four authors' theological writings on vision and knowledge of God to explore how contradictory theories of sight shaped their cosmologies, theologies, subjectivities, genders, and discursive worlds. As Emily R. Cain demonstrates, how the authors portray eyes reveals how they envisioned one's relationship to the world, while how they portray mirrors reveals how they imagined the unknown. Both have dramatic impacts on how one interprets what it means to see God through a mirror dimly. She shows that arguments about the phenomenon of visual perception are deeply intertwined with broader debates about identity, agency, and epistemology, and uncovers some of the most self-conscious ways that late ancient Christians thought of themselves, their worlds, and their God.},\n\tpublisher = {Oxford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Cain, Emily R.},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Mirrors of the Divine brings into focus how four influential authors of the late ancient world—Tertullian of Carthage, Clement of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, and Augustine of Hippo—employ language of vision and of mirrors in their discursive struggles to construct Christian agency, identity, and epistemology. Early Christian authors described the vision of God through the Pauline verse 1 Corinthians 13:12: \"For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face.\" Yet each author interpreted this verse differently, based on a diverse set of assumptions about how they understood seeing and mirrors to function: does vision occur by something leaving or entering the eye? Is one impacted by seeing or by being seen? Do mirrors offer trustworthy knowledge?Spanning the second through fourth centuries CE in both Eastern and Western Christianity, Mirrors of the Divine analyzes these four authors' theological writings on vision and knowledge of God to explore how contradictory theories of sight shaped their cosmologies, theologies, subjectivities, genders, and discursive worlds. As Emily R. Cain demonstrates, how the authors portray eyes reveals how they envisioned one's relationship to the world, while how they portray mirrors reveals how they imagined the unknown. Both have dramatic impacts on how one interprets what it means to see God through a mirror dimly. She shows that arguments about the phenomenon of visual perception are deeply intertwined with broader debates about identity, agency, and epistemology, and uncovers some of the most self-conscious ways that late ancient Christians thought of themselves, their worlds, and their God.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Maxim of Greek Philosophy Found in Scripture: \"Know Yourself\" in Origen and Reflections in Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ramelli, I. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Filtvedt, O. J.; and Schröter, J., editor(s), Know Yourself: Echoes and Interpretations of the Delphic Maxim in Ancient Judaism, Christianity, and Philosophy, of Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, pages 423–471. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{ramelli_maxim_2023,\n\taddress = {Berlin, Boston},\n\tseries = {Beihefte zur {Zeitschrift} für die neutestamentliche {Wissenschaft}},\n\ttitle = {A {Maxim} of {Greek} {Philosophy} {Found} in {Scripture}: "{Know} {Yourself}" in {Origen} and {Reflections} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tisbn = {978-3-11-108385-8},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783111083858/html},\n\tabstract = {The book explores ancient interpretations and usages of the famous Delphic maxim “know yourself”. The primary emphasis is on Jewish, Christian and Greco-Roman sources from the first four centuries CE. The individual contributions examine both direct quotations of the maxim as well as more distant echoes. Most of the sources included in the book have never previously been studied in any detail with a view to their use and interpretation of the Delphic maxim. Thus, the book contributes significantly to the origin and different interpretations of the maxim in antiquity as well as to its reception history in ancient philosophical and theological discourses. The chapters of the book are linked to each other by numerous cross-references which makes it possible to compare the different views of the maxim with each other. It also helps readers to notice relationships and trajectories within the material. The explorations of the relevant sources are also set in the context of ongoing debates about the shape and nature of ancient conceptions of self and self-knowledge. The book thus demonstrates the wide variety of philosophical and theological approaches in that the injunction to know oneself could be viewed and how these interpretations provide windows into ancient discourses about self and self-knowledge.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {260},\n\turldate = {2023-12-14},\n\tbooktitle = {Know {Yourself}: {Echoes} and {Interpretations} of the {Delphic} {Maxim} in {Ancient} {Judaism}, {Christianity}, and {Philosophy}},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\tauthor = {Ramelli, Ilaria L.E.},\n\teditor = {Filtvedt, Ole Jakob and Schröter, Jens},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Connaissance de soi, Self-knowledge},\n\tpages = {423--471},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The book explores ancient interpretations and usages of the famous Delphic maxim “know yourself”. The primary emphasis is on Jewish, Christian and Greco-Roman sources from the first four centuries CE. The individual contributions examine both direct quotations of the maxim as well as more distant echoes. Most of the sources included in the book have never previously been studied in any detail with a view to their use and interpretation of the Delphic maxim. Thus, the book contributes significantly to the origin and different interpretations of the maxim in antiquity as well as to its reception history in ancient philosophical and theological discourses. The chapters of the book are linked to each other by numerous cross-references which makes it possible to compare the different views of the maxim with each other. It also helps readers to notice relationships and trajectories within the material. The explorations of the relevant sources are also set in the context of ongoing debates about the shape and nature of ancient conceptions of self and self-knowledge. The book thus demonstrates the wide variety of philosophical and theological approaches in that the injunction to know oneself could be viewed and how these interpretations provide windows into ancient discourses about self and self-knowledge.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity. By Nathan D. Howard. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022. vii + 338 pp. $120.00 cloth.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Arnold, J. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Church History, 92(3): 677–679. September 2023.\n Publisher: Cambridge University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ChristianityPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{arnold_christianity_2023,\n\ttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}: {The} {Cappadocian} {Fathers} and the {Rhetoric} of {Masculinity}. {By} {Nathan} {D}. {Howard}. {Cambridge}, {UK}: {Cambridge} {University} {Press}, 2022. vii + 338 pp. \\$120.00 cloth.},\n\tvolume = {92},\n\tissn = {0009-6407, 1755-2613},\n\tshorttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/abs/christianity-and-the-contest-for-manhood-in-late-antiquity-the-cappadocian-fathers-and-the-rhetoric-of-masculinity-by-nathan-d-howard-cambridge-uk-cambridge-university-press-2022-vii-338-pp-12000-cloth/A0369C0B2A49BD83934BD936CFC1E5FA?utm_source=SFMC&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Article&utm_campaign=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Issues&WT.mc_id=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Issues},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0009640723002184},\n\tabstract = {//static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn\\%3Acambridge.org\\%3Aid\\%3Aarticle\\%3AS0009640723002184/resource/name/firstPage-S0009640723002184a.jpg},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2023-12-12},\n\tjournal = {Church History},\n\tauthor = {Arnold, Jonathan J.},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},\n\tpages = {677--679},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n //static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009640723002184/resource/name/firstPage-S0009640723002184a.jpg\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Christ, the Spirit, and Human Transformation in Gregory of Nyssa's In Canticum Canticorum.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Abecina, A. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Oxford Studies in Historical TheologyOxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{abecina_christ_2023,\n\taddress = {Oxford, New York},\n\tseries = {Oxford {Studies} in {Historical} {Theology}},\n\ttitle = {Christ, the {Spirit}, and {Human} {Transformation} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}'s {In} {Canticum} {Canticorum}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-19-774594-6},\n\tabstract = {This book provides a comprehensive literary and theological analysis of Gregory of Nyssa's theology of union with God, culminating in a fresh reading of his final written work, In Canticum Canticorum (c.391), a collection of fifteen allegorical homilies on the Song of Songs. Part I gives the essential background for the study of In Canticum Canticorum by analysing several of Gregory's earlier works (c.370—385), tracing the main contours of his account of the human transformation and union with God. Author Alexander Abecina explores topics such as Gregory's theology of virginity and spiritual marriage, his theology of baptism, his trinitarian theology, and his Spirit-based Christology. In Part II Abecina builds on his key findings in Part I to structure a detailed analysis of In Canticum Canticorum. Engaging with the latest contemporary scholarship on Gregory of Nyssa, the author shows how Gregory's allegorical interpretation of the Song of Songs represents a corresponding account of human transformation and union with God from the perspective of subjective experience of this reality. Rather than marking a new development in Gregory's mature thought, Abecina demonstrates that the subjective experience gained from Gregory's reading of the Song of Songs recapitulates the key elements of his objective account and therefore renders coherent his earlier soteriological doctrine.},\n\tpublisher = {Oxford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Abecina, Alexander L.},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Anthropologie, Anthropology, Cant., Union with God, Union à Dieu},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This book provides a comprehensive literary and theological analysis of Gregory of Nyssa's theology of union with God, culminating in a fresh reading of his final written work, In Canticum Canticorum (c.391), a collection of fifteen allegorical homilies on the Song of Songs. Part I gives the essential background for the study of In Canticum Canticorum by analysing several of Gregory's earlier works (c.370—385), tracing the main contours of his account of the human transformation and union with God. Author Alexander Abecina explores topics such as Gregory's theology of virginity and spiritual marriage, his theology of baptism, his trinitarian theology, and his Spirit-based Christology. In Part II Abecina builds on his key findings in Part I to structure a detailed analysis of In Canticum Canticorum. Engaging with the latest contemporary scholarship on Gregory of Nyssa, the author shows how Gregory's allegorical interpretation of the Song of Songs represents a corresponding account of human transformation and union with God from the perspective of subjective experience of this reality. Rather than marking a new development in Gregory's mature thought, Abecina demonstrates that the subjective experience gained from Gregory's reading of the Song of Songs recapitulates the key elements of his objective account and therefore renders coherent his earlier soteriological doctrine.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Apollinarist Doctrine and Its Rejection by St. Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cristescu, V.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Teologia, 94(1): 77–89. 2023.\n Publisher: Editura Universității Aurel Vlaicu\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{cristescu_apollinarist_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Apollinarist} {Doctrine} and {Its} {Rejection} by {St}. {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tvolume = {94},\n\tissn = {2247-4382, 1453-4789, 1453-4789},\n\turl = {https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1195760},\n\tabstract = {From the misunderstanding of the unity of the person of Christ, Apollinaris of Laodicea came to the denial of the affirmation of the harmony between the two wills of Christ and at the same time to the denial of the rational soul of Christ. Apollinaris emphasizes the disunity in the person of Christ that is necessarily born in him because of the rational soul and, through it, in the human will as well. St. Gregory of Nyssa strongly criticized the Apollinaris’ doctrine. He based his argument pointing out the truth that Christ can only be called man if he consists of a rational body and soul. In his treatise Adversum Apollinarem, St. Gregory exegetically addresses the Christological aspects misunderstood by Apollinaris and combats them step by step. Apollinaris’ support of the pre-existence of the body of Christ ruins the teaching of the Incarnation and the Trinitarian teaching. St Gregory understands the two Pauline formulas “image of God” and “image of the servant” in Philippians 2, 6-12 as two distinct natures.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-11-28},\n\tjournal = {Teologia},\n\tauthor = {Cristescu, Vasile},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Editura Universității Aurel Vlaicu},\n\tkeywords = {Apolinaire, Apolinarius, Christologie, Christology},\n\tpages = {77--89},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n From the misunderstanding of the unity of the person of Christ, Apollinaris of Laodicea came to the denial of the affirmation of the harmony between the two wills of Christ and at the same time to the denial of the rational soul of Christ. Apollinaris emphasizes the disunity in the person of Christ that is necessarily born in him because of the rational soul and, through it, in the human will as well. St. Gregory of Nyssa strongly criticized the Apollinaris’ doctrine. He based his argument pointing out the truth that Christ can only be called man if he consists of a rational body and soul. In his treatise Adversum Apollinarem, St. Gregory exegetically addresses the Christological aspects misunderstood by Apollinaris and combats them step by step. Apollinaris’ support of the pre-existence of the body of Christ ruins the teaching of the Incarnation and the Trinitarian teaching. St Gregory understands the two Pauline formulas “image of God” and “image of the servant” in Philippians 2, 6-12 as two distinct natures.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n How to Make Use of Pagan Knowledge without Separating Oneself from the Church’s Milk: The Function of Otherness in Gregory of Nyssa’s Theory of Self-Perfection.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Stenger, J. R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Ayres, L.; Crawford, M. R.; and Champion, M. W., editor(s), The Intellectual World of Late Antique Christianity: Reshaping Classical Traditions, pages 328–346. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"HowPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{stenger_how_2023,\n\taddress = {Cambridge},\n\ttitle = {How to {Make} {Use} of {Pagan} {Knowledge} without {Separating} {Oneself} from the {Church}’s {Milk}: {The} {Function} of {Otherness} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}’s {Theory} of {Self}-{Perfection}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-108-83529-9},\n\tshorttitle = {How to {Make} {Use} of {Pagan} {Knowledge} without {Separating} {Oneself} from the {Church}’s {Milk}},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/intellectual-world-of-late-antique-christianity/how-to-make-use-of-pagan-knowledge-without-separating-oneself-from-the-churchs-milk-the-function-of-otherness-in-gregory-of-nyssas-theory-of-selfperfection/FAE1C0BF8C516ABB23BEAF30ADBE220C},\n\tabstract = {One of the central issues to which the Cappadocian fathers frequently returned was the possibility of Christian paideia. It has been pointed out that the idea of morphosis, a never-ending process of giving shape to one’s life in imitation of Christ, is at the heart of Gregory of Nyssa’s educational thinking. What has been overlooked is the way Gregory’s awareness of paideia as an engagement of the subject with an object raises the methodological problem of how this relationship can be established. This chapter illuminates Gregory’s concept of self-formation by investigating the ways in which he theorises the acquisition and ordering of knowledge suited to the life of faith. A reading of his Life of Moses demonstrates that, drawing on the rhetoric of an opposition between Christianity and classical culture, Gregory re-evaluates this tension from a pedagogical perspective. His novel idea is that the negotiation of foreignness and kinship can be a catalyst for Christian self-perfection.},\n\turldate = {2023-11-24},\n\tbooktitle = {The {Intellectual} {World} of {Late} {Antique} {Christianity}: {Reshaping} {Classical} {Traditions}},\n\tpublisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n\tauthor = {Stenger, Jan R.},\n\teditor = {Ayres, Lewis and Crawford, Matthew R. and Champion, Michael W.},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/9781108883559.020},\n\tpages = {328--346},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n One of the central issues to which the Cappadocian fathers frequently returned was the possibility of Christian paideia. It has been pointed out that the idea of morphosis, a never-ending process of giving shape to one’s life in imitation of Christ, is at the heart of Gregory of Nyssa’s educational thinking. What has been overlooked is the way Gregory’s awareness of paideia as an engagement of the subject with an object raises the methodological problem of how this relationship can be established. This chapter illuminates Gregory’s concept of self-formation by investigating the ways in which he theorises the acquisition and ordering of knowledge suited to the life of faith. A reading of his Life of Moses demonstrates that, drawing on the rhetoric of an opposition between Christianity and classical culture, Gregory re-evaluates this tension from a pedagogical perspective. His novel idea is that the negotiation of foreignness and kinship can be a catalyst for Christian self-perfection.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Apophaticism, Mysticism, and Epoptics in Ancient and Patristic Philosophy: Some Important Examples.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ramelli, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Verbum Vitae, 41(3): 547–586. 2023.\n Number: 3\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Apophaticism,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ramelli_apophaticism_2023,\n\ttitle = {Apophaticism, {Mysticism}, and {Epoptics} in {Ancient} and {Patristic} {Philosophy}: {Some} {Important} {Examples}},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2023 Verbum Vitae},\n\tissn = {2451-280X},\n\tshorttitle = {Apophaticism, {Mysticism}, and {Epoptics} in {Ancient} and {Patristic} {Philosophy}},\n\turl = {https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/vv/article/view/16420},\n\tdoi = {10.31743/vv.16420},\n\tabstract = {This article investigates mystic apophaticism in a set of Greek Patristic theologians, profoundly informed by philosophy, especially imperial Platonism: Clement, Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, and Pseudo-Dionysius. Both the terminology and the argumentative structure will be examined in each author and important connections among themselves and with ‘pagan’ Neoplatonists (including Plotinus, Porphyry, and Proclus) will be drawn. The reciprocal interrelations among epoptics, ἔρως and ἀγάπη, epektasis, and ἐπιστροφή and ἀποκατάστασις will be pointed out. The article will argue for the intended double-reference strategy to both ‘pagan’ and Christian Platonism, as well as Dionysius’ veiled response to Porphyry qua accuser of Origen, and the meaning of the charge, levelled against Dionysius himself, of “making unholy use of Greek things”—which is what ‘pagans’ had already charged Origen with. Dionysius retorted, “it is the Greeks who make unholy use of godly things to attack God!”, and this is again what Origen had responded.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2023-11-23},\n\tjournal = {Verbum Vitae},\n\tauthor = {Ramelli, Ilaria},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Number: 3},\n\tpages = {547--586},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article investigates mystic apophaticism in a set of Greek Patristic theologians, profoundly informed by philosophy, especially imperial Platonism: Clement, Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, and Pseudo-Dionysius. Both the terminology and the argumentative structure will be examined in each author and important connections among themselves and with ‘pagan’ Neoplatonists (including Plotinus, Porphyry, and Proclus) will be drawn. The reciprocal interrelations among epoptics, ἔρως and ἀγάπη, epektasis, and ἐπιστροφή and ἀποκατάστασις will be pointed out. The article will argue for the intended double-reference strategy to both ‘pagan’ and Christian Platonism, as well as Dionysius’ veiled response to Porphyry qua accuser of Origen, and the meaning of the charge, levelled against Dionysius himself, of “making unholy use of Greek things”—which is what ‘pagans’ had already charged Origen with. Dionysius retorted, “it is the Greeks who make unholy use of godly things to attack God!”, and this is again what Origen had responded.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Le sophisme de la beauté chez Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fílová, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n AUC THEOLOGICA, 13(1): 135–158. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{filova_sophisme_2023,\n\ttitle = {Le sophisme de la beauté chez {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\turl = {https://karolinum.cz/casopis/auc-theologica/rocnik-13/cislo-1/clanek-11949},\n\tabstract = {In my article, I will discuss Gregory’s view of beauty from a theological-anthropological perspective, focusing on why beauty is deceptive and where the limits and boundaries lie between beauty as a theological category and beauty that becomes an idol and does not lead to God. The key question will be how beauty, whose source is God – the essential beauty – can be deceptive. I want to emphasise that although Gregory sometimes speaks about the deceptiveness of beauty, the ambiguity lies not in the beauty itself but in the ability or inability of the human being to discern the beautiful. Here I draw on the foundation of Gregory’s anthropology, namely the creation of human beings in the image and likeness of God. I will further analyse Gregory’s concept of the knowledge of beauty and its relationship to desire and passion in Gregory. I will conclude by reflecting on the moment when beauty becomes an idol that leads people away from the path of knowledge of the truly beautiful.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-11-22},\n\tjournal = {AUC THEOLOGICA},\n\tauthor = {Fílová, Lenka},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Anthropologie, Anthropology, Beauty, Beauté},\n\tpages = {135--158},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In my article, I will discuss Gregory’s view of beauty from a theological-anthropological perspective, focusing on why beauty is deceptive and where the limits and boundaries lie between beauty as a theological category and beauty that becomes an idol and does not lead to God. The key question will be how beauty, whose source is God – the essential beauty – can be deceptive. I want to emphasise that although Gregory sometimes speaks about the deceptiveness of beauty, the ambiguity lies not in the beauty itself but in the ability or inability of the human being to discern the beautiful. Here I draw on the foundation of Gregory’s anthropology, namely the creation of human beings in the image and likeness of God. I will further analyse Gregory’s concept of the knowledge of beauty and its relationship to desire and passion in Gregory. I will conclude by reflecting on the moment when beauty becomes an idol that leads people away from the path of knowledge of the truly beautiful.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Chungman Lee. Gregory of Nyssa, Augustine of Hippo, and the Filioque.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Boudignon, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique, 118(1-2): 300–303. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{boudignon_chungman_2023,\n\ttitle = {Chungman {Lee}. {Gregory} of {Nyssa}, {Augustine} of {Hippo}, and the {Filioque}},\n\tvolume = {118},\n\tdoi = {10.1484/J.RHE.5.134431},\n\tnumber = {1-2},\n\tjournal = {Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique},\n\tauthor = {Boudignon, Christian},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Recension, Review},\n\tpages = {300--303},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La libertad como imago Dei viva: Gregorio de Nisa y Ramón Sibiuda.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bastitta Harriet, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In O'Reilly, F.; and Perpere Viñuales, Á., editor(s), Imago Dei, Capax Dei. Ensayos en honor a Héctor Delbosco, pages 17–34. Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino, Tucumán, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{bastitta_harriet_libertad_2023,\n\taddress = {Tucumán},\n\ttitle = {La libertad como imago {Dei} viva: {Gregorio} de {Nisa} y {Ramón} {Sibiuda}},\n\tbooktitle = {Imago {Dei}, {Capax} {Dei}. {Ensayos} en honor a {Héctor} {Delbosco}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino},\n\tauthor = {Bastitta Harriet, Francisco},\n\teditor = {O'Reilly, Francisco and Perpere Viñuales, Álvaro},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tkeywords = {Freedom, Image de Dieu, Image of God, Liberté, Reception, Réception},\n\tpages = {17--34},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Imago Dei as an Eschatological Concept in Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kaplan, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Huian, G.; Wyss, B.; and Hirsch-Luipold, R., editor(s), Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes. Von der Theologie zur Anthropologie und zurück, pages 115–130. De Gruyter, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{kaplan_imago_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Imago} {Dei} as an {Eschatological} {Concept} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tisbn = {978-3-11-102240-6},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111022406-008/html},\n\tabstract = {The Imago Dei as an Eschatological Concept in Gregory of Nyssa was published in Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes on page 115.},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\turldate = {2023-09-16},\n\tbooktitle = {Der {Mensch} als {Bild} des unergründlichen {Gottes}. {Von} der {Theologie} zur {Anthropologie} und zurück},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\tauthor = {Kaplan, Ilya},\n\teditor = {Huian, Georgiana and Wyss, Beatrice and Hirsch-Luipold, Rainer},\n\tcollaborator = {Kaplan, Ilya},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/9783111022406-008},\n\tkeywords = {Image de Dieu, Image of God, Op. hom.},\n\tpages = {115--130},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The Imago Dei as an Eschatological Concept in Gregory of Nyssa was published in Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes on page 115.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Church as Christ’s Availability in Gregory of Nyssa’s Cant. 13.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kaplan, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Huian, G.; Wyss, B.; and Hirsch-Luipold, R., editor(s), Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes. Von der Theologie zur Anthropologie und zurück, pages 43–52. De Gruyter, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{kaplan_church_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Church} as {Christ}’s {Availability} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}’s \\textit{{Cant}.} 13},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tisbn = {978-3-11-102240-6},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Church} as {Christ}’s {Availability}},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111022406-003/html},\n\tabstract = {The Church as Christ’s Availability in Gregory of Nyssa’s Cant. 13 was published in Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes on page 43.},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\turldate = {2023-09-16},\n\tbooktitle = {Der {Mensch} als {Bild} des unergründlichen {Gottes}. {Von} der {Theologie} zur {Anthropologie} und zurück},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\tauthor = {Kaplan, Ilya},\n\teditor = {Huian, Georgiana and Wyss, Beatrice and Hirsch-Luipold, Rainer},\n\tcollaborator = {Kaplan, Ilya},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/9783111022406-003},\n\tkeywords = {Cant., Church, Ecclesiology, Ecclésiologie, Église},\n\tpages = {43--52},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The Church as Christ’s Availability in Gregory of Nyssa’s Cant. 13 was published in Der Mensch als Bild des unergründlichen Gottes on page 43.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n MIMESIS IN GREGORY OF NYSSA - (M.) Motia Imitations of Infinity. Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Mimesis. Pp. viii + 275. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022. Cased, £56, US$69.95. {ISBN}: 978-0-8122-5313-9.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Monroe, T. P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Classical Review, 73(2): 486–488. 2023.\n Publisher: Cambridge University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"MIMESISPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{monroe_mimesis_2023,\n\ttitle = {{MIMESIS} {IN} {GREGORY} {OF} {NYSSA} - ({M}.) {Motia} {Imitations} of {Infinity}. {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and the {Transformation} of {Mimesis}. {Pp}. viii + 275. {Philadelphia}: {University} of {Pennsylvania} {Press}, 2022. {Cased}, £56, {US}\\$69.95. {ISBN}: 978-0-8122-5313-9.},\n\tvolume = {73},\n\tissn = {0009-840X, 1464-3561},\n\tshorttitle = {{MIMESIS} {IN} {GREGORY} {OF} {NYSSA} - ({M}.) {Motia} {Imitations} of {Infinity}. {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and the {Transformation} of {Mimesis}. {Pp}. viii + 275. {Philadelphia}},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-review/article/abs/mimesis-in-gregory-of-nyssa-m-motia-imitations-of-infinity-gregory-of-nyssa-and-the-transformation-of-mimesis-pp-viii-275-philadelphia-university-of-pennsylvania-press-2022-cased-56-us6995-isbn-9780812253139/FDFDE853763427FB7D671DCEEDB53A33?utm_source=SFMC&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Article&utm_campaign=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Articles&WT.mc_id=New%20Cambridge%20Alert%20-%20Articles},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0009840X23001348},\n\tabstract = {//static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn\\%3Acambridge.org\\%3Aid\\%3Aarticle\\%3AS0009840X23001348/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X23001348a.jpg},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2023-07-02},\n\tjournal = {The Classical Review},\n\tauthor = {Monroe, Ty Paul},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},\n\tpages = {486--488},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n //static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X23001348/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X23001348a.jpg\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2022\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Quehacer teológico en Gregorio de Nisa y renovación del quehacer teológico hoy. Marco conceptual desde De Vita Moysis e In Canticum Canticorum.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jaramillo Vargas, G. A.; and Solano Pinzón, O.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Theologica Xaveriana, 72. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"QuehacerPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{jaramillo_vargas_quehacer_2022,\n\ttitle = {Quehacer teológico en {Gregorio} de {Nisa} y renovación del quehacer teológico hoy. {Marco} conceptual desde {De} {Vita} {Moysis} e {In} {Canticum} {Canticorum}},\n\tvolume = {72},\n\tissn = {2011-219X, 0120-3649},\n\turl = {https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/teoxaveriana/article/view/35975},\n\tdoi = {10.11144/javeriana.tx72.twgnrt},\n\tabstract = {La teología como ejercicio en continua elaboración y en diálogo con los signos de los tiempos necesita renovarse permanentemente en orden a responder mejor a los desafíos de una cultura posmoderna, marcada por el desencanto y heridas de diversa índole. Este artículo mostrará algunos resulados de la investigación doctoral realizada por el autor en la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia), titulada “Quehacer teológico en Gregorio de Nisa y renovación del quehacer teológico hoy. Aportes desde De Vita Moysis e In Canticum Canticorum”, la cual se centra de manera especial en la manera como Gregorio hace teología. Uno de los problemas sobre el cual algunos teólogos contemporáneos buscan indagar consiste en la separación entre teología y santidad, la cual dividió algo que era una sola realidad en el quehacer teológico de los padres, como la sangre y la carne deben permanecer juntas para poder vivir. Este problema está acentuado en el contexto latinoamericano, por la lenta recepción y desarrollo de los estudios patrísticos. En la presente investigación parece que Gregorio de Nisa tiene una contribución particular frente a dicho problema en sus dos obras místicas más importantes, en las cuales despliega su manera particular de hacer teología.\nDesde la hermenéutica de la apropiación de Paul Ricoeur, en la cual el intérprete se deja guiar por el mundo que los textos le abren, lo comprende y apropia en una experiencia que le permite desubrir nuevas dimensiones de su ser en el mundo, este artículo desea presentar una síntesis del quehacer teológico de Gregorio en La vida de Moisés y Homilías sobre el Cantar de los cantares. En este sentido, el quehacer teológico de Gregorio se podría comprender en el marco conceptual de las siguientes categorías: μυστήριον, μυσταγωγία, μυστικά, γνóφος, ἀκολουθία y ἐπέκτασις. Estas seis importantes categorías podrían contribuir a los esfuerzos de renovación propuestos por el Concilio Vaticano II, y presentes en las teologías contextuales latinoamericanas, que siguen el doble dinamismo de renovación ad fontes y a giorno.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Theologica Xaveriana},\n\tauthor = {Jaramillo Vargas, Gabriel Alberto and Solano Pinzón, Orlando},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Cant., Modern Theology, Moys., Théologie moderne},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n La teología como ejercicio en continua elaboración y en diálogo con los signos de los tiempos necesita renovarse permanentemente en orden a responder mejor a los desafíos de una cultura posmoderna, marcada por el desencanto y heridas de diversa índole. Este artículo mostrará algunos resulados de la investigación doctoral realizada por el autor en la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia), titulada “Quehacer teológico en Gregorio de Nisa y renovación del quehacer teológico hoy. Aportes desde De Vita Moysis e In Canticum Canticorum”, la cual se centra de manera especial en la manera como Gregorio hace teología. Uno de los problemas sobre el cual algunos teólogos contemporáneos buscan indagar consiste en la separación entre teología y santidad, la cual dividió algo que era una sola realidad en el quehacer teológico de los padres, como la sangre y la carne deben permanecer juntas para poder vivir. Este problema está acentuado en el contexto latinoamericano, por la lenta recepción y desarrollo de los estudios patrísticos. En la presente investigación parece que Gregorio de Nisa tiene una contribución particular frente a dicho problema en sus dos obras místicas más importantes, en las cuales despliega su manera particular de hacer teología. Desde la hermenéutica de la apropiación de Paul Ricoeur, en la cual el intérprete se deja guiar por el mundo que los textos le abren, lo comprende y apropia en una experiencia que le permite desubrir nuevas dimensiones de su ser en el mundo, este artículo desea presentar una síntesis del quehacer teológico de Gregorio en La vida de Moisés y Homilías sobre el Cantar de los cantares. En este sentido, el quehacer teológico de Gregorio se podría comprender en el marco conceptual de las siguientes categorías: μυστήριον, μυσταγωγία, μυστικά, γνóφος, ἀκολουθία y ἐπέκτασις. Estas seis importantes categorías podrían contribuir a los esfuerzos de renovación propuestos por el Concilio Vaticano II, y presentes en las teologías contextuales latinoamericanas, que siguen el doble dinamismo de renovación ad fontes y a giorno.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Les « gouttes de la nuit » dans la XIe homélie sur le Cantique des Cantiques de Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n De Andia, Y.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Teresianum, 73(1): 281–303. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LesPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{de_andia__2022,\n\ttitle = {Les « gouttes de la nuit » dans la {XIe} homélie sur le \\textit{{Cantique} des {Cantiques}} de {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tvolume = {73},\n\tissn = {0392-4556, 2611-7649},\n\turl = {https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/10.1484/J.TER.5.130340},\n\tdoi = {10.1484/J.TER.5.130340},\n\tlanguage = {it},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Teresianum},\n\tauthor = {De Andia, Ysabel},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Cant., Mysticism, Mystique},\n\tpages = {281--303},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Bluets of Late Antiquity: Polychromy and Christian Mysticism.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Motia, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studies in Late Antiquity, 6(2): 335–369. May 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"BluetsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{motia_bluets_2022,\n\ttitle = {Bluets of {Late} {Antiquity}: {Polychromy} and {Christian} {Mysticism}},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tissn = {2470-6469},\n\tshorttitle = {Bluets of {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2022.6.2.335},\n\tdoi = {10.1525/sla.2022.6.2.335},\n\tabstract = {Contemporary studies of mysticism pay careful attention to the way words signify—and for good reason. Early Christians debated theories of language and invented new ones to try to speak the impossible. But what if we shift the focus from linguistic signification to chromatic differentiation? What do we notice when we’re looking not for moments when words fail but moments when colors pop? Polychromy and the jeweled style of late ancient aesthetics are now well-known features of late ancient art, and yet these studies are often vague about actual colors. This paper attempts to slow the swirl of late ancient colors to show how early Christians found God in the color blue.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Studies in Late Antiquity},\n\tauthor = {Motia, Michael},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Color, Couleur, Mysticism, Mystique, Pseudo-Denys, Pseudo-Dionysius},\n\tpages = {335--369},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Contemporary studies of mysticism pay careful attention to the way words signify—and for good reason. Early Christians debated theories of language and invented new ones to try to speak the impossible. But what if we shift the focus from linguistic signification to chromatic differentiation? What do we notice when we’re looking not for moments when words fail but moments when colors pop? Polychromy and the jeweled style of late ancient aesthetics are now well-known features of late ancient art, and yet these studies are often vague about actual colors. This paper attempts to slow the swirl of late ancient colors to show how early Christians found God in the color blue.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Status of Vulnerability in a Theology of the Christian Life: Gregory of Nyssa on the “Wound of Love” in Conversation with Sarah Coakley.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Thomas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Modern Theology, 83: 537–553. 2022.\n _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/moth.12801\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{thomas_status_2022,\n\ttitle = {The {Status} of {Vulnerability} in a {Theology} of the {Christian} {Life}: {Gregory} of {Nyssa} on the “{Wound} of {Love}” in {Conversation} with {Sarah} {Coakley}},\n\tvolume = {83},\n\tissn = {1468-0025},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Status} of {Vulnerability} in a {Theology} of the {Christian} {Life}},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/moth.12801},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/moth.12801},\n\tabstract = {Discussions among theologians concerning the status of vulnerability—along with its cousins suffering, pain, and kenosis—have come to the fore in recent decades. It is not surprising that the tradition in which God becomes human would speak of vulnerability, but the question whether Christianity should wholeheartedly affirm vulnerability is not easily resolved. The aim of this essay is to explore this issue by juxtaposing the thought of Gregory of Nyssa and Sarah Coakley with respect to the status of vulnerability in a theology of the Christian life. These two theologians, I will argue, adopt divergent approaches to human vulnerability to God. When we read them in conversation with one another, broader implications emerge regarding the status of vulnerability in a theology of the Christian life.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2022-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Modern Theology},\n\tauthor = {Thomas, Gabrielle},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {\\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/moth.12801},\n\tkeywords = {Modern Theology, Reception, Réception, Théologie moderne, Vulnerability, Vulnérabilité},\n\tpages = {537--553},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Discussions among theologians concerning the status of vulnerability—along with its cousins suffering, pain, and kenosis—have come to the fore in recent decades. It is not surprising that the tradition in which God becomes human would speak of vulnerability, but the question whether Christianity should wholeheartedly affirm vulnerability is not easily resolved. The aim of this essay is to explore this issue by juxtaposing the thought of Gregory of Nyssa and Sarah Coakley with respect to the status of vulnerability in a theology of the Christian life. These two theologians, I will argue, adopt divergent approaches to human vulnerability to God. When we read them in conversation with one another, broader implications emerge regarding the status of vulnerability in a theology of the Christian life.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Howard, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{howard_christianity_2022,\n\taddress = {Cambridge ; New York},\n\ttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}: {The} {Cappadocian} {Fathers} and the {Rhetoric} of {Masculinity}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-00-909082-7},\n\tshorttitle = {Christianity and the {Contest} for {Manhood} in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\tpublisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n\tauthor = {Howard, Nathan D.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Notre Père, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sferlea, O.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Orizonturi Teologice, (2): 124–126. 2022.\n Publisher: EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN ORADEA\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GrégoirePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sferlea_gregoire_2022,\n\ttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse}, {Homélies} sur le {Notre} {Père}, texte, {Introduction} et notes de {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}, {Traduction}  de {Josette} {Seguin}, {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}},\n\tissn = {1582-1757},\n\turl = {https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1076301},\n\tabstract = {Review of: Gr\\&\\#233;goire de Nysse, Hom\\&\\#233;lies sur le Notre P\\&\\#232;re, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Sources Chr\\&\\#233;tiennes 596, Les \\&\\#201;ditions du Cerf, ISBN 978-2-204-12971-8, Paris, 2018, 570 p. (Lect. Univ.dr. Gheorghe Ovidiu Sferlea, University of Oradea).},\n\tlanguage = {French},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-11-29},\n\tjournal = {Orizonturi Teologice},\n\tauthor = {Sferlea, Ovidiu},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Publisher: EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN ORADEA},\n\tpages = {124--126},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Review of: Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Notre Père, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Sources Chrétiennes 596, Les Éditions du Cerf, ISBN 978-2-204-12971-8, Paris, 2018, 570 p. (Lect. Univ.dr. Gheorghe Ovidiu Sferlea, University of Oradea).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2021\n \n \n (9)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n God's Revelation to Moses according to Gregory of Nyssa's Life of Moses.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Panczová, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Teologie Ortodoxa, 26: 23–34. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"God'sPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{panczova_gods_2021,\n\ttitle = {God's {Revelation} to {Moses} according to {Gregory} of {Nyssa}'s {Life} of {Moses}},\n\tvolume = {26},\n\turl = {https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1006896},\n\tabstract = {« In the Book II of the Life of Moses Gregory presents his idea of the way towards human perfection through the life of virtue. There is one strong feature that characterizes Gregory's view: human strife is connected with God's Incarnation. This connection between anthropology and Christology comes to the fore in the three places of the work Life of Moses where God reveals himself to Moses: the theopany in the burning bush, the theophany in darkness at Sinai, and the revelation of God's glory. All three theophanies present similar themes: divine call to humans to renew the image of God; that it is important to know God because it forms the life of virtue; how it is possible to know God; the Incarnation as the way to know God; the Incarnation as the basis that makes the renewal of the image of God in humans possible.»},\n\tjournal = {Teologie Ortodoxa},\n\tauthor = {Panczová, Helena},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Moys.},\n\tpages = {23--34},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n « In the Book II of the Life of Moses Gregory presents his idea of the way towards human perfection through the life of virtue. There is one strong feature that characterizes Gregory's view: human strife is connected with God's Incarnation. This connection between anthropology and Christology comes to the fore in the three places of the work Life of Moses where God reveals himself to Moses: the theopany in the burning bush, the theophany in darkness at Sinai, and the revelation of God's glory. All three theophanies present similar themes: divine call to humans to renew the image of God; that it is important to know God because it forms the life of virtue; how it is possible to know God; the Incarnation as the way to know God; the Incarnation as the basis that makes the renewal of the image of God in humans possible.»\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Follow the guide according to the « De vita Moysis » of Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zhang, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia patristica, 115: 133–144. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FollowPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{zhang_follow_2021,\n\ttitle = {Follow the guide according to the « {De} vita {Moysis} » of {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tvolume = {115},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27vt5jc.15},\n\tabstract = {Grégoire de Nysse caractérise Moïse comme un guide à suivre, une notion importante dans le cheminement spirituel vers la perfection.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Studia patristica},\n\tauthor = {Zhang, Liang},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv27vt5jc.15},\n\tpages = {133--144},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Grégoire de Nysse caractérise Moïse comme un guide à suivre, une notion importante dans le cheminement spirituel vers la perfection.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Reconsidering the « filioque » from Gregory of Nyssa and Augustine of Hippo.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lee, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia patristica, 123: 399–410. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ReconsideringPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{lee_reconsidering_2021,\n\ttitle = {Reconsidering the « filioque » from {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and {Augustine} of {Hippo}},\n\tvolume = {123},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27vt545.31},\n\tabstract = {Examine la théologie trinitaire de Grégoire de Nysse et d’Augustin d’Hippone sur deux points : la définition précise du monopatrisme et celle du rôle du Fils dans la procession de l’Esprit. Les deux Pères affichent des positions similaires sur ces questions.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Studia patristica},\n\tauthor = {Lee, Chungman},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv27vt545.31},\n\tkeywords = {Augustin, Esprit saint, Filioque, Holy Spirit},\n\tpages = {399--410},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Examine la théologie trinitaire de Grégoire de Nysse et d’Augustin d’Hippone sur deux points : la définition précise du monopatrisme et celle du rôle du Fils dans la procession de l’Esprit. Les deux Pères affichent des positions similaires sur ces questions.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Engendering difference : resonance and dissonance in approaches to gender within the writings of the two Gregorys and Luce Irigaray.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Guise, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Patristica, 130: 549–562. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"EngenderingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{guise_engendering_2021,\n\ttitle = {Engendering difference : resonance and dissonance in approaches to gender within the writings of the two {Gregorys} and {Luce} {Irigaray}},\n\tvolume = {130},\n\tshorttitle = {Engendering difference},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27vt634.43},\n\tabstract = {L’approche du genre chez Grégoire de Nysse (« Vita Macrinae », « Dialogus de anima et resurrectione ») et Grégoire de Nazianze (« In laudem Caesarii fratris », « In laudem sororis Gorgoniae ») est lue dans le cadre des théories féministes de L. Irigaray.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Studia Patristica},\n\tauthor = {Guise, Margaret},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv27vt634.43},\n\tkeywords = {Gender, Genre, Gregory of Nazianzus, Grégoire de Nazianze},\n\tpages = {549--562},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n L’approche du genre chez Grégoire de Nysse (« Vita Macrinae », « Dialogus de anima et resurrectione ») et Grégoire de Nazianze (« In laudem Caesarii fratris », « In laudem sororis Gorgoniae ») est lue dans le cadre des théories féministes de L. Irigaray.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n « Con toda certeza llegasteis a conocer a esta joven paloma, criada en el nido imperial » (Pulcher., 462, 10-2) : Pulqueria y su representación en el βασιλικὸς λόγος de Gregorio de Nisa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Chiriatti, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Patristica, 130: 215–230. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"«Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{chiriatti__2021,\n\ttitle = {« {Con} toda certeza llegasteis a conocer a esta joven paloma, criada en el nido imperial » ({Pulcher}., 462, 10-2) : {Pulqueria} y su representación en el βασιλικὸς λόγος de {Gregorio} de {Nisa}},\n\tvolume = {130},\n\tshorttitle = {« {Con} toda certeza llegasteis a conocer a esta joven paloma, criada en el nido imperial » ({Pulcher}., 462, 10-2)},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27vt634.21},\n\tabstract = {Concerne la fille de Théodose.},\n\turldate = {2024-03-06},\n\tjournal = {Studia Patristica},\n\tauthor = {Chiriatti, Mattia},\n\teditor = {Chiriatti, Mattia C. and Olkinuora, Damaskinos and Vinzent, Markus},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv27vt634.21},\n\tkeywords = {Pulcher.},\n\tpages = {215--230},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Concerne la fille de Théodose.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n El proceder teológico de Gregorio de Nisa en De Vita Moysis e In Canticum Canticorum.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jaramillo, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Patristica, 115: 161–176. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{jaramillo_proceder_2021,\n\ttitle = {El proceder teológico de {Gregorio} de {Nisa} en {De} {Vita} {Moysis} e {In} {Canticum} {Canticorum}},\n\tvolume = {115},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv27vt5jc.18},\n\tabstract = {Luego de haber planteado la vida y el contexto de Gregorio de Nisa, en el cual se identificó a un teológo que devela su corazón por medio de sus obras escritas y que al mismo tiempo, tuvo la habilidad literaria para mostrar la profundidad de su experiencia de fe, se pasó a analizar los textos desde la hermenéutica de Paul Ricoeur, teniendo como base la edición griega de la colección Gregorii Nysseni Opera. El análisis de los textos en cuestión, permitió identificar las categorías más importantes de la manera de hacer teología por parte de Gregorio, así como la elaboración...},\n\tjournal = {Studia Patristica},\n\tauthor = {Jaramillo, Gabriel},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Cant., Moys.},\n\tpages = {161--176},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Luego de haber planteado la vida y el contexto de Gregorio de Nisa, en el cual se identificó a un teológo que devela su corazón por medio de sus obras escritas y que al mismo tiempo, tuvo la habilidad literaria para mostrar la profundidad de su experiencia de fe, se pasó a analizar los textos desde la hermenéutica de Paul Ricoeur, teniendo como base la edición griega de la colección Gregorii Nysseni Opera. El análisis de los textos en cuestión, permitió identificar las categorías más importantes de la manera de hacer teología por parte de Gregorio, así como la elaboración...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Cappadocian Paradise? Exploring the Sermo De Paradiso (CPG 3127).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Segers, J.; Leemans, J.; and Roskam, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Adamantius, 27: 350–368. 2021.\n Publisher: Editrice Morcelliana S.p.A.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{segers_cappadocian_2021,\n\ttitle = {A {Cappadocian} {Paradise}? {Exploring} the {Sermo} \\textit{{De} {Paradiso}} (\\textit{{CPG}} 3127)},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tissn = {11266244},\n\tshorttitle = {A {Cappadocian} {Paradise}?},\n\turl = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=162613056&site=ehost-live},\n\tabstract = {This article offers a first explorative analysis of the sermon De Paradiso (CPG 3127), transmitted under the names of both Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa. The text has been critically edited by Hörner but has for the rest largely escaped scholarly attention. After shortly dealing with the complex problem of authorship through manuscripts and attribution, this paper focusses on several other aspects of the sermon, shedding light on the text, content and structure of the sermon itself. It approaches the sermon from different points of view, exploring the genre of the text (including its structure and content), the way in which exegesis is done (rewriting Genesis), the style and rhetoric (sermons and style and the relation between preacher and audience), and the way in which traces of other texts are found in the sermon (intertextuality and the function of Bible references). The focus of this approach lies on providing an overall picture of the text, although the results of this research lead to better insights regarding the question of authorship as well, without coming to definitive conclusions.},\n\turldate = {2023-05-30},\n\tjournal = {Adamantius},\n\tauthor = {Segers, Josien and Leemans, Johan and Roskam, Geert},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Editrice Morcelliana S.p.A.},\n\tkeywords = {CPG 3127, Parad., Paradis, Paradise, Pseudo},\n\tpages = {350--368},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article offers a first explorative analysis of the sermon De Paradiso (CPG 3127), transmitted under the names of both Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa. The text has been critically edited by Hörner but has for the rest largely escaped scholarly attention. After shortly dealing with the complex problem of authorship through manuscripts and attribution, this paper focusses on several other aspects of the sermon, shedding light on the text, content and structure of the sermon itself. It approaches the sermon from different points of view, exploring the genre of the text (including its structure and content), the way in which exegesis is done (rewriting Genesis), the style and rhetoric (sermons and style and the relation between preacher and audience), and the way in which traces of other texts are found in the sermon (intertextuality and the function of Bible references). The focus of this approach lies on providing an overall picture of the text, although the results of this research lead to better insights regarding the question of authorship as well, without coming to definitive conclusions.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Philip-Philagathos’ allegorical interpretation of Heliodorus’ Aithiopika: Eros, mimesis and scriptural anagogical exegesis.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Duluș, M. G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 114(3): 1037–1078. September 2021.\n Publisher: De Gruyter\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Philip-Philagathos’Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{dulus_philip-philagathos_2021,\n\ttitle = {Philip-{Philagathos}’ allegorical interpretation of {Heliodorus}’ {Aithiopika}: {Eros}, mimesis and scriptural anagogical exegesis},\n\tvolume = {114},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tissn = {1868-9027},\n\tshorttitle = {Philip-{Philagathos}’ allegorical interpretation of {Heliodorus}’ {Aithiopika}},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bz-2021-0055/html},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/bz-2021-0055},\n\tabstract = {The debate over the authorship of the allegorical interpretation of Heliodorus’ novel extant in codex Marc. Gr. 410 (coll. 522) bequeathed to subsequent scholarship the assumption that the text belongs to the Neoplatonic allegorical tradition of reading Homer. This essay aims to revisit this philosophical attribution and argue that the terms and philosophical categories alluded in this allegory are characteristic of a long tradition of Patristic analysis, and more specifically of Gregory of Nyssa and Maximus Confessor’s exegesis. Setting forth new textual evidence, it argues that the exegetical practice displayed in the allegory reflects Maximus Confessor’s anagogical exegesis (i. e., the etymological and numerical speculations) and Gregory of Nyssa’s pedagogy of desire and doctrine of spiritual progress as set forth in the Homilies on the Song of Songs and The Life of Moses.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2023-09-18},\n\tjournal = {Byzantinische Zeitschrift},\n\tauthor = {Duluș, Mircea G.},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Publisher: De Gruyter},\n\tkeywords = {Byzance, Byzantium, Exegesis, Exégèse, Reception, Réception},\n\tpages = {1037--1078},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The debate over the authorship of the allegorical interpretation of Heliodorus’ novel extant in codex Marc. Gr. 410 (coll. 522) bequeathed to subsequent scholarship the assumption that the text belongs to the Neoplatonic allegorical tradition of reading Homer. This essay aims to revisit this philosophical attribution and argue that the terms and philosophical categories alluded in this allegory are characteristic of a long tradition of Patristic analysis, and more specifically of Gregory of Nyssa and Maximus Confessor’s exegesis. Setting forth new textual evidence, it argues that the exegetical practice displayed in the allegory reflects Maximus Confessor’s anagogical exegesis (i. e., the etymological and numerical speculations) and Gregory of Nyssa’s pedagogy of desire and doctrine of spiritual progress as set forth in the Homilies on the Song of Songs and The Life of Moses.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Platonism and Gregory of Nyssa.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Edwards, M. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Lauritzen, F.; and Wear, S. K., editor(s), The Byzantine Platonists, 284-1453, of Theandrites. Studies on Byzantine Philosophy and Christian Platonism, pages 32–47. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{edwards_platonism_2021,\n\taddress = {Washington, D.C},\n\tseries = {Theandrites. {Studies} on {Byzantine} {Philosophy} and {Christian} {Platonism}},\n\ttitle = {Platonism and {Gregory} of {Nyssa}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-73665-610-5},\n\tabstract = {"This volume brings together articles by sixteen leading scholars on a cross-section of Platonists authors-Christian and non-Christian-from early through late Byzantium philosophy, including the Capaddocians, Cyril, Proclus, Damascius, Dionysius, George of Pisidia, Nicetas Stethatos, Nikephoros Choumenos, Psellos, and George Palamas. The reception of Byzantine thought in the Latin tradition is also considered. The articles collectively show development in the Greek East on ontological issues such as the doctrine of the soul, as well as theological concepts of the One/God and Trinity within a hierarchical universe. The volume considers exegetical questions relating to the use of Plato and the Platonists by Byzantine Christian authors"--},\n\tlanguage = {anglais},\n\tbooktitle = {The {Byzantine} {Platonists}, 284-1453},\n\tpublisher = {The Catholic University of America Press},\n\tauthor = {Edwards, Mark Julian},\n\teditor = {Lauritzen, Frederick and Wear, Sarah Klitenic},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Ancient Philosophy, Philosophie antique, Platonism, Platonisme},\n\tpages = {32--47},\n}\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"This volume brings together articles by sixteen leading scholars on a cross-section of Platonists authors-Christian and non-Christian-from early through late Byzantium philosophy, including the Capaddocians, Cyril, Proclus, Damascius, Dionysius, George of Pisidia, Nicetas Stethatos, Nikephoros Choumenos, Psellos, and George Palamas. The reception of Byzantine thought in the Latin tradition is also considered. The articles collectively show development in the Greek East on ontological issues such as the doctrine of the soul, as well as theological concepts of the One/God and Trinity within a hierarchical universe. The volume considers exegetical questions relating to the use of Plato and the Platonists by Byzantine Christian authors\"–\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2020\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa’s (Relational) Doctrine of Grace as an Ontology of History in Ecumenical Perspective.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maspero, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Theological Research. The Journal of Systematic Theology, 8: 23–44. 2020.\n Number: 0\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GregoryPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{maspero_gregory_2020,\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}’s ({Relational}) {Doctrine} of {Grace} as an {Ontology} of {History} in {Ecumenical} {Perspective}},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2021 Giulio Maspero},\n\tissn = {2353-7078},\n\turl = {http://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/theologicalresearch/article/view/4126},\n\tdoi = {10.15633/thr.4126},\n\tabstract = {The paper shows the relevance of Gregory of Nyssa’s Trinitarian ontology for Ecumenism. In fact, the Cappadocian’s rereading of the relationship between ontology and history makes it possible to combine dynamics and being in his reading of divinization as epektasis. This seems to be relevant from the perspective of Luther studies, as it shows that Tuomo Mannermaa’s interpretation of the Reformer’s thought could be interpreted as relational and not merely dialectical. In the end, it seems that the research on a true theological ontology and the deepening of the theology of history can be useful for a better understanding of Luther’s intention and inspiration in his doctrine on grace.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2022-01-03},\n\tjournal = {Theological Research. The Journal of Systematic Theology},\n\tauthor = {Maspero, Giulio},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tnote = {Number: 0},\n\tkeywords = {Ecumenism, Grace, Grâce, Oecuménisme, Théologie trinitaire, Trinitarian Theology},\n\tpages = {23--44},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The paper shows the relevance of Gregory of Nyssa’s Trinitarian ontology for Ecumenism. In fact, the Cappadocian’s rereading of the relationship between ontology and history makes it possible to combine dynamics and being in his reading of divinization as epektasis. This seems to be relevant from the perspective of Luther studies, as it shows that Tuomo Mannermaa’s interpretation of the Reformer’s thought could be interpreted as relational and not merely dialectical. In the end, it seems that the research on a true theological ontology and the deepening of the theology of history can be useful for a better understanding of Luther’s intention and inspiration in his doctrine on grace.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Deux lettres de Grégoire de Nysse sur son Contre Eunome.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kanaan, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Gavoille, É., editor(s), La lettre et l'oeuvre, of Epistulae antiquae, pages 177–190. Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, Tours, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{kanaan_deux_2020,\n\taddress = {Tours},\n\tseries = {Epistulae antiquae},\n\ttitle = {Deux lettres de {Grégoire} de {Nysse} sur son {Contre} {Eunome}},\n\tnumber = {10},\n\tbooktitle = {La lettre et l'oeuvre},\n\tpublisher = {Presses universitaires François-Rabelais},\n\tauthor = {Kanaan, Marlène},\n\teditor = {Gavoille, Élisabeth},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tkeywords = {Ep. 29-30},\n\tpages = {177--190},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2019\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa and Platonism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Peroli, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Barry, D., editor(s), Passionate Mind. Essays in Honor of John M. Rist, pages 211–232. Academia Verlag, Baden-Baden, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{peroli_gregory_2019,\n\taddress = {Baden-Baden},\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa} and {Platonism}},\n\tbooktitle = {Passionate {Mind}. {Essays} in {Honor} of {John} {M}. {Rist}},\n\tpublisher = {Academia Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Peroli, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Barry, David},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tkeywords = {Ancient Philosophy, Philosophie antique, Plato, Platon},\n\tpages = {211--232},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Notre Père, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kontouma, V.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue des études byzantines, 77: 321–324. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kontouma_gregoire_2019,\n\ttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse}, {Homélies} sur le {Notre} {Père}, texte, {Introduction} et notes de {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}, {Traduction}  de {Josette} {Seguin}, {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}},\n\tvolume = {77},\n\tjournal = {Revue des études byzantines},\n\tauthor = {Kontouma, Vassa},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {321--324},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2017\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Aesthetic Themes in Pagan Christian Neoplatonism: from Plotinus to Gregory of Nyssa , written by Daniele Iozzia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Corrias, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 11(1): 111–112. April 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AestheticPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{corrias_aesthetic_2017,\n\ttitle = {Aesthetic {Themes} in {Pagan} {Christian} {Neoplatonism}: from {Plotinus} to {Gregory} of {Nyssa} \\textit{, written by} {Daniele} {Iozzia}},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tissn = {1872-5473},\n\tshorttitle = {{\\textless}b{\\textgreater}{Aesthetic} {Themes} in {Pagan} {Christian} {Neoplatonism}},\n\turl = {http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341373},\n\tdoi = {10.1163/18725473-12341373},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2017-05-01},\n\tjournal = {The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition},\n\tauthor = {Corrias, Anna},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {111--112},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2016\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Infinitatea lui Dumnezeu la Sfântul Grigorie de Nyssa. Folosirea teologică a unui concept.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sferlea, O.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Antiqua et MediaevaliaEditura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iasi, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{sferlea_infinitatea_2016,\n\taddress = {Iasi},\n\tseries = {Antiqua et {Mediaevalia}},\n\ttitle = {Infinitatea lui {Dumnezeu} la {Sfântul} {Grigorie} de {Nyssa}. {Folosirea} teologică a unui concept},\n\tisbn = {978-606-714-214-3},\n\tshorttitle = {Infinitatea lui {Dumnezeu}},\n\tpublisher = {Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”},\n\tauthor = {Sferlea, Ovidiu},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Divine Infinity, Infinité divine},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa. Contra Eunomium III. An English Translation with Commentary and Supporting Studies.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pottier, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue d'Histoire Ecclésiastique, 111(1-2): 376–377. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GregoryPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pottier_gregory_2016,\n\ttitle = {Gregory  of  {Nyssa}. {Contra}  {Eunomium}  {III}.  {An}  {English}  {Translation}  with {Commentary}  and  {Supporting}  {Studies}},\n\tvolume = {111},\n\tissn = {0035-2381},\n\turl = {http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.RHE.5.110730},\n\tdoi = {10.1484/J.RHE.5.110730},\n\tnumber = {1-2},\n\turldate = {2016-10-10},\n\tjournal = {Revue d'Histoire Ecclésiastique},\n\tauthor = {Pottier, Bernard},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Recension, Review},\n\tpages = {376--377},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2014\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Gregory of Nyssa, Contra Eunomium III: an English Translation with Commentary and Supporting Studies. Proceedings of the 12th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa (Leuven, 14-17 September 2010).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leemans, J.; and Cassin, M.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Supplements to Vigiliae ChristianaeBrill, Leiden, Boston, 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{leemans_gregory_2014,\n\taddress = {Leiden, Boston},\n\tseries = {Supplements to {Vigiliae} {Christianae}},\n\ttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, \\textit{{Contra} {Eunomium}} {III}: an {English} {Translation} with {Commentary} and {Supporting} {Studies}. {Proceedings} of the 12th {International} {Colloquium} on {Gregory} of {Nyssa} ({Leuven}, 14-17 {September} 2010)},\n\tisbn = {978-90-04-27061-9 90-04-27061-2},\n\tshorttitle = {Gregory of {Nyssa}, {\\textless}i{\\textgreater}contra {Eunomium}{\\textless}/{I}{\\textgreater} {Iii}},\n\tlanguage = {Contributions in English, French, and German.},\n\tnumber = {124},\n\tpublisher = {Brill},\n\teditor = {Leemans, Johan and Cassin, Matthieu},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tkeywords = {Eun.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2013\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Philosophical Life: Biography and the Crafting of Intellectual Identity in Late Antiquity.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Urbano, A. P\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Patristic Monograph SeriesCatholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{urbano_philosophical_2013,\n\taddress = {Washington, D.C},\n\tseries = {Patristic {Monograph} {Series}},\n\ttitle = {The {Philosophical} {Life}: {Biography} and the {Crafting} of {Intellectual} {Identity} in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8132-2163-2 0-8132-2163-3},\n\turl = {http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780813221632/},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {21},\n\turldate = {2015-01-29},\n\tpublisher = {Catholic University of America Press},\n\tauthor = {Urbano, Arthur P},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {An. et res., Bas., Biographie, Biography, Culture, Hellénisme, Lifes, Macr., Moys., Vies},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2011\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Gregorio di Nissa, Omelie sulle Beatitudini.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Somenzi, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Letture cristiane del primo millenioPaoline, Milano, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{somenzi_gregorio_2011,\n\taddress = {Milano},\n\tseries = {Letture cristiane del primo millenio},\n\ttitle = {Gregorio di {Nissa}, {Omelie} sulle {Beatitudini}},\n\tisbn = {9788831540728 :},\n\tshorttitle = {Gregorio di {Nissa}, {Omelie} sulle {Beatitudini}},\n\tnumber = {47},\n\tpublisher = {Paoline},\n\tauthor = {Somenzi, Chiara},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tkeywords = {Beat., Traduction italienne},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2008\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grégoire de Nysse : la Bible dans la construction de son discours. Actes du colloque de Paris, 9-10 février 2007.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cassin, M.; and Grelier, H.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Études augustiniennes, série antiquitéÉtudes augustiniennes, Paris, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{cassin_gregoire_2008,\n\taddress = {Paris},\n\tseries = {Études augustiniennes, série antiquité},\n\ttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse} : la {Bible} dans la construction de son discours. {Actes} du colloque de {Paris}, 9-10 février 2007},\n\tisbn = {978-2-85121-229-0},\n\tshorttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse} : la {Bible}},\n\tnumber = {184},\n\tpublisher = {Études augustiniennes},\n\teditor = {Cassin, Matthieu and Grelier, Hélène},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {Exégèse},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Nyssa in Kappadokien.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pochoshajew, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n . 2008.\n Publisher: Universität Rostock\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NyssaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pochoshajew_nyssa_2008,\n\ttitle = {Nyssa in {Kappadokien}},\n\turl = {http://rosdok.uni-rostock.de/resolve/id/rosdok_document_0000000075},\n\tdoi = {10.18453/ROSDOK_ID00002139},\n\tabstract = {Gregor ist neben Origenes der Kirchenvater, über den aktuell weltweit die meisten Forschungsaktivitäten erfolgen. Trotz der Forschungsarbeit ist unser Kenntnisstand über die Bischofsstadt Gregors unzureichend. Im Artikel werden die Ergebnisse der im Sommer 2007 vorgenommenen Besichtigung des vermuteten Standortes Nyssas im Kontext der Forschungserkenntnisse dargestellt.},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\turldate = {2023-10-11},\n\tauthor = {Pochoshajew, Igor},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universität Rostock},\n\tkeywords = {Nyssa, Nysse},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Gregor ist neben Origenes der Kirchenvater, über den aktuell weltweit die meisten Forschungsaktivitäten erfolgen. Trotz der Forschungsarbeit ist unser Kenntnisstand über die Bischofsstadt Gregors unzureichend. Im Artikel werden die Ergebnisse der im Sommer 2007 vorgenommenen Besichtigung des vermuteten Standortes Nyssas im Kontext der Forschungserkenntnisse dargestellt.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2005\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Der Mensch als Selbstaufgabe : Psychologie Gregors von Nyssa in \"De perfectione\" auf dem Hintergrund der Seelenlehre Platos.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pochoshajew, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 98(2): 473–483. 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pochoshajew_mensch_2005,\n\ttitle = {Der {Mensch} als {Selbstaufgabe} : {Psychologie} {Gregors} von {Nyssa} in "{De} perfectione" auf dem {Hintergrund} der {Seelenlehre} {Platos}},\n\tvolume = {98},\n\tissn = {0007-7704},\n\tshorttitle = {Der {Mensch} als {Selbstaufgabe}},\n\tlanguage = {German},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Byzantinische Zeitschrift},\n\tauthor = {Pochoshajew, Igor},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Perf., Plato, Platon, Psychologie, Psychology},\n\tpages = {473--483},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1982\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La tecnica esegetica di Gregorio di Nissa nella Vita di Mosè.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Simonetti, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studi storico-religiosi, 6: 401–418. 1982.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{simonetti_tecnica_1982,\n\ttitle = {La tecnica esegetica di {Gregorio} di {Nissa} nella {Vita} di {Mosè}},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tjournal = {Studi storico-religiosi},\n\tauthor = {Simonetti, Manlio},\n\tyear = {1982},\n\tkeywords = {Exegesis, Exégèse, Moys.},\n\tpages = {401--418},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1975\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Perfection in the virtuous life: a study in the relationship between edification and polemical theology in Gregory of Nyssa's \"de vita Moysis.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heine, R. E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Patristic Monograph SeriesPhiladelphia Patristic Foundation, Philadelphia, 1975.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"PerfectionPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{heine_perfection_1975,\n\taddress = {Philadelphia},\n\tseries = {Patristic {Monograph} {Series}},\n\ttitle = {Perfection in the virtuous life: a study in the relationship between edification and polemical theology in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}'s "de vita {Moysis}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-915646-01-2},\n\tshorttitle = {Perfection in the virtuous life},\n\turl = {https://archive.org/details/perfectioninvirt0000hein_c0a3},\n\tlanguage = {anglais},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tpublisher = {Philadelphia Patristic Foundation},\n\tauthor = {Heine, Ronald Eugene},\n\tyear = {1975},\n\tkeywords = {Moys.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Simplicité de la nature divine et distinctions en Dieu selon saint Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Krivochéine, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Messager de l’exarchat du patriarche russe en Europe occidentale, 91-92: 133–158. 1975.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"SimplicitéPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{krivocheine_simplicite_1975,\n\ttitle = {Simplicité de la nature divine et distinctions en {Dieu} selon saint {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tvolume = {91-92},\n\turl = {https://basilekrivocheine.org/fr-oeuvres/simplicit-delanature-divine-etdistinctions-endieu-selon-saint-grgoire-denysse/},\n\tjournal = {Messager de l’exarchat du patriarche russe en Europe occidentale},\n\tauthor = {Krivochéine, Basile},\n\tyear = {1975},\n\tkeywords = {Simplicity, Simplicité, Théologie trinitaire, Trinitarian Theology},\n\tpages = {133--158},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n undefined\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Review of: Christianity and the contest for manhood in late antiquity: the Cappadocian Fathers and the rhetoric of masculinity.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Conner, E. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Bryn Mawr Classical Review. .\n BMCR ID: 2023.11.27\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ReviewPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{conner_review_nodate,\n\ttitle = {Review of: {Christianity} and the contest for manhood in late antiquity: the {Cappadocian} {Fathers} and the rhetoric of masculinity},\n\tissn = {1055-7660},\n\turl = {https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2023/2023.11.27/},\n\turldate = {2023-11-21},\n\tjournal = {Bryn Mawr Classical Review},\n\tauthor = {Conner, Elizabeth Mattingly},\n\tcollaborator = {Howard, Nathan D.},\n\tnote = {BMCR ID: 2023.11.27},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);