\n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Édition d’un fragment copte du In S. Stephanum I de Grégoire de Nysse (BHG 1654; CPG 3186).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Labadie, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Analecta Bollandiana, 140(2): 281–293. 2022.\n
Publisher: Société des Bollandistes\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{labadie_edition_2022,\n\ttitle = {Édition d’un fragment copte du \\textit{{In} {S}. {Stephanum} {I}} de {Grégoire} de {Nysse} (\\textit{{BHG}} 1654; \\textit{{CPG}} 3186)},\n\tvolume = {140},\n\tissn = {0003-2468},\n\turl = {https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.ABOL.5.134156},\n\tdoi = {10.1484/J.ABOL.5.134156},\n\tabstract = {This paper offers an edition, translation, and commentary of a fragmentary Sahidic Coptic version of Gregory of Nyssa’s first homily on the protomartyr Stephen (BHG 1654; CPG 3186). This Coptic text, which bears the marks of many Bohairic linguistic features, is a relevant example of the learned and literary translations from Greek produced in Medieval Egypt.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2023-03-18},\n\tjournal = {Analecta Bollandiana},\n\tauthor = {Labadie, Damien},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Société des Bollandistes},\n\tkeywords = {Copte, Coptic, Steph. I},\n\tpages = {281--293},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper offers an edition, translation, and commentary of a fragmentary Sahidic Coptic version of Gregory of Nyssa’s first homily on the protomartyr Stephen (BHG 1654; CPG 3186). This Coptic text, which bears the marks of many Bohairic linguistic features, is a relevant example of the learned and literary translations from Greek produced in Medieval Egypt.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n Seeing and Not Seeing in the Darkness: Philo of Alexandria and Gregory of Nyssa’s Exegeses of Exod 20:21.\n \n \n\n\n \n Dudziková, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
The studia Philonica annual, 34: 113. 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{dudzikova_seeing_2022,\n\ttitle = {Seeing and {Not} {Seeing} in the {Darkness}: {Philo} of {Alexandria} and {Gregory} of {Nyssa}’s {Exegeses} of {Exod} 20:21},\n\tvolume = {34},\n\tissn = {1052-4533},\n\tshorttitle = {Seeing and {Not} {Seeing} in the {Darkness}},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tjournal = {The studia Philonica annual},\n\tauthor = {Dudziková, Markéta},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Darkness, Ex 20, Exegesis, Exégèse, Philo of Alexandria, Philon d'Alexandrie, Ténèbres},\n\tpages = {113},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n Education in Late Antiquity: Challenges, Dynamism, and Reinterpretation, 300-550 CE.\n \n \n\n\n \n Stenger, J. R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, February 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{stenger_education_2022,\n\taddress = {Oxford, New York},\n\ttitle = {Education in {Late} {Antiquity}: {Challenges}, {Dynamism}, and {Reinterpretation}, 300-550 {CE}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-19-886978-8},\n\tshorttitle = {Education in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\tabstract = {Education in Late Antiquity offers the first comprehensive account of the Graeco-Roman debate on education between c. 300 and 550 CE. Jan Stenger traces changing attitudes towards the aims and methods of teaching, learning, and formation through the explicit and implicit theories developed by Christian and pagan writers during this period. Whereas the postclassical education system has been seen as an immovable and uniform field, Stenger argues that writers of the period offered substantive critiques of established formal education and tried to reorient ancient approaches to learning. Bringing together a wide range of discourses and genres, Education in Late Antiquity shows how educational thought was implicated in the ideas and practices of wider society, addressing central preoccupations of the time, including morality, religion, the relationship with others and the world, and concepts of gender and the self. The key idea was that education was a transformative process that gave shape to the entire being of a person, instead of merely imparting formal knowledge or skills. Thus, the debate revolved around attaining happiness, the good life, and fulfilment, and so orienting education toward the development of the notion of humanity within the person. By exploring the discourse on education, this book recovers the changing horizons of Graeco-Roman thought on learning and formation.},\n\tpublisher = {Oxford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Stenger, Jan R.},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Education, Macr., Moys., Thaum., Éducation},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n Education in Late Antiquity offers the first comprehensive account of the Graeco-Roman debate on education between c. 300 and 550 CE. Jan Stenger traces changing attitudes towards the aims and methods of teaching, learning, and formation through the explicit and implicit theories developed by Christian and pagan writers during this period. Whereas the postclassical education system has been seen as an immovable and uniform field, Stenger argues that writers of the period offered substantive critiques of established formal education and tried to reorient ancient approaches to learning. Bringing together a wide range of discourses and genres, Education in Late Antiquity shows how educational thought was implicated in the ideas and practices of wider society, addressing central preoccupations of the time, including morality, religion, the relationship with others and the world, and concepts of gender and the self. The key idea was that education was a transformative process that gave shape to the entire being of a person, instead of merely imparting formal knowledge or skills. Thus, the debate revolved around attaining happiness, the good life, and fulfilment, and so orienting education toward the development of the notion of humanity within the person. By exploring the discourse on education, this book recovers the changing horizons of Graeco-Roman thought on learning and formation.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n The Bishop’s Moral Authority in Gregory of Nyssa’s Adversus eos qui castigatione aegre ferunt.\n \n \n\n\n \n Farrugia, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Attard, S. M.; and Berry, J. A., editor(s),
Fidelis et verax. Essays in honour of His Grace Mgr Charles J. Scicluna on the tenth anniversary of his episcopal ordination, pages 397–408. Kite Group, Malta, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{farrugia_bishops_2022,\n\taddress = {Malta},\n\ttitle = {The {Bishop}’s {Moral} {Authority} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa}’s \\textit{{Adversus} eos qui castigatione aegre ferunt}},\n\tbooktitle = {Fidelis et verax. {Essays} in honour of {His} {Grace} {Mgr} {Charles} {J}. {Scicluna} on the tenth anniversary of his episcopal ordination},\n\tpublisher = {Kite Group},\n\tauthor = {Farrugia, Jonathan},\n\teditor = {Attard, Stefan M. and Berry, John A.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Authority, Autorité, Bishops, Castig., Évêques},\n\tpages = {397--408},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Virgin Territory: Configuring Female Virginity in Early Christianity.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lillis, J. K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Christianity in Late AntiquityUniversity of California Press, Oakland (CA), 2022.\n
Publication Title: Virgin Territory\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{lillis_virgin_2022,\n\taddress = {Oakland (CA)},\n\tseries = {Christianity in {Late} {Antiquity}},\n\ttitle = {Virgin {Territory}: {Configuring} {Female} {Virginity} in {Early} {Christianity}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-520-38902-1},\n\tshorttitle = {Virgin {Territory}},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520389021/html},\n\tabstract = {Women's virginity held tremendous significance in early Christianity and the Mediterranean world. Julia Kelto Lillis demonstrates that early Christian thinkers developed diverse definitions of virginity and understood its bodily aspects in surprising, often nonanatomical ways. Eventually Christians took part in a cross-cultural shift toward viewing virginity as something that could be perceived in women's sex organs. Treating virginity as anatomical brought both benefits and costs. By charting this shift and situating it in the larger landscape of ancient thought, Virgin Territory illuminates unrecognized differences among early Christian sources and historicizes problematic ideas about women's bodies that still persist today.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {13},\n\turldate = {2023-01-10},\n\tpublisher = {University of California Press},\n\tauthor = {Lillis, Julia Kelto},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1525/9780520389021},\n\tnote = {Publication Title: Virgin Territory},\n\tkeywords = {Virginity, Virginité},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n Women's virginity held tremendous significance in early Christianity and the Mediterranean world. Julia Kelto Lillis demonstrates that early Christian thinkers developed diverse definitions of virginity and understood its bodily aspects in surprising, often nonanatomical ways. Eventually Christians took part in a cross-cultural shift toward viewing virginity as something that could be perceived in women's sex organs. Treating virginity as anatomical brought both benefits and costs. By charting this shift and situating it in the larger landscape of ancient thought, Virgin Territory illuminates unrecognized differences among early Christian sources and historicizes problematic ideas about women's bodies that still persist today.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n Wearing the Cross: Macrina, the Cross, and Co-Crucifixion.\n \n \n\n\n \n Harley-McGowan, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Jeferson, L. M., editor(s),
Death and Rebirth in Late Antiquity: essays in honor of Robin M. Jensen, pages 67–106. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{harley-mcgowan_wearing_2022,\n\taddress = {Lanham},\n\ttitle = {Wearing the {Cross}: {Macrina}, the {Cross}, and {Co}-{Crucifixion}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-978701-59-5},\n\tbooktitle = {Death and {Rebirth} in {Late} {Antiquity}: essays in honor of {Robin} {M}. {Jensen}},\n\tpublisher = {Rowman and Littlefield},\n\tauthor = {Harley-McGowan, Felicity},\n\teditor = {Jeferson, Lee M.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Croix, Cross, Macr., Macrina, Macrine},\n\tpages = {67--106},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n Ælia Flaccilla ou l’idéal de la souveraine chrétienne pour Grégoire de Nysse.\n \n \n\n\n \n Destephen, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Lamy, M.; and Shimahara, S., editor(s),
Le pouvoir au féminin. Modèles et anti-modèles bibliques, du IV$^{\\textrm{e}}$ au XVII$^{\\textrm{e}}$ siècle, of Théologie historique, pages 37–54. Beauchesne, Paris, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{destephen_aelia_2022,\n\taddress = {Paris},\n\tseries = {Théologie historique},\n\ttitle = {Ælia {Flaccilla} ou l’idéal de la souveraine chrétienne pour {Grégoire} de {Nysse}},\n\tnumber = {131},\n\tbooktitle = {Le pouvoir au féminin. {Modèles} et anti-modèles bibliques, du {IV}$^{\\textrm{e}}$ au {XVII}$^{\\textrm{e}}$ siècle},\n\tpublisher = {Beauchesne},\n\tauthor = {Destephen, Sylvain},\n\teditor = {Lamy, Marielle and Shimahara, Sumi},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Flacill., Flacilla, Imperial power, Placilla, Pouvoir impérial},\n\tpages = {37--54},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n God as a Role Model: Practical Homoiosis Theoi in the Works of Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyss.\n \n \n\n\n \n Valgaeren, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Verheyden, J.; Roskam, G.; Heirmann, A.; and Leemans, J., editor(s),
Reaching for perfection: studies on the means and goals of ascetical practices in an interreligious perspective, of Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium. Peeters, Leuven Paris Bristol, CT, 2022.\n
Meeting Name: International Conference on the Relation between Asceticism and Aspirations to Reach out for Perfection\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{valgaeren_god_2022,\n\taddress = {Leuven Paris Bristol, CT},\n\tseries = {Bibliotheca {Ephemeridum} theologicarum {Lovaniensium}},\n\ttitle = {God as a {Role} {Model}: {Practical} {Homoiosis} {Theoi} in the {Works} of {Basil} of {Caesarea} and {Gregory} of {Nyss}},\n\tisbn = {978-90-429-4997-3},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {329},\n\tbooktitle = {Reaching for perfection: studies on the means and goals of ascetical practices in an interreligious perspective},\n\tpublisher = {Peeters},\n\tauthor = {Valgaeren, Thomas},\n\teditor = {Verheyden, Joseph and Roskam, Geert and Heirmann, Ann and Leemans, Johan},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Meeting Name: International Conference on the Relation between Asceticism and Aspirations to Reach out for Perfection},\n\tkeywords = {Basil of Caesarea, Basile de Césarée, God's imitation, Imitation de Dieu, Perfection},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n The Great Chasm of Luke 16:26 and Its Interpretations in Byzantine Patristics.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kurdybaylo, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Scrinium, 18(1): 143–164. 2022.\n
Publisher: Brill\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kurdybaylo_great_2022,\n\ttitle = {The {Great} {Chasm} of {Luke} 16:26 and {Its} {Interpretations} in {Byzantine} {Patristics}},\n\tvolume = {18},\n\tissn = {1817-7530, 1817-7565},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Great} {Chasm} of {Luke} 16},\n\turl = {https://brill.com/view/journals/scri/18/1/article-p143_8.xml},\n\tdoi = {10.1163/18177565-bja10068},\n\tabstract = {Abstract The ‘great chasm’ mentioned in Luke 16:26 is a hapax legomenon in the New Testament. However, the same wording appears in the Theogony of Hesiod and in several later classical Greek writings, which connect the great chasm with the mythology of the underworld or some metaphysical conceptions. Byzantine exegetes of Luke could hardly avoid correlating Luke’s great chasm with its long history in the pagan culture. Thus, several exegetical paths were developed. Origen, with several followers, omit the great chasm at all. Comparing this fact with later anti-Origenian polemic writings, it is plausible that Luke 16:26 was used to argue the rejection of the doctrine of apokatastasis. Other writers, prone to apokatastatic position, such as Didymus the Blind and Gregory of Nyssa, introduced interpretations of the great chasm that unite ethical and metaphysical perspectives. Gregory of Nazianzus and Maximus the Confessor brought allegorical interpretations of the great chasm to the highest level of generalisation. The evolution of understanding the great chasm reveals the shift in the conceptions of a human soul’s destiny and afterlife, its fate and deliverance from it.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2022-12-15},\n\tjournal = {Scrinium},\n\tauthor = {Kurdybaylo, Dmitry},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Brill},\n\tkeywords = {Exegesis, Exégèse, Lc 16, 26},\n\tpages = {143--164},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n Abstract The ‘great chasm’ mentioned in Luke 16:26 is a hapax legomenon in the New Testament. However, the same wording appears in the Theogony of Hesiod and in several later classical Greek writings, which connect the great chasm with the mythology of the underworld or some metaphysical conceptions. Byzantine exegetes of Luke could hardly avoid correlating Luke’s great chasm with its long history in the pagan culture. Thus, several exegetical paths were developed. Origen, with several followers, omit the great chasm at all. Comparing this fact with later anti-Origenian polemic writings, it is plausible that Luke 16:26 was used to argue the rejection of the doctrine of apokatastasis. Other writers, prone to apokatastatic position, such as Didymus the Blind and Gregory of Nyssa, introduced interpretations of the great chasm that unite ethical and metaphysical perspectives. Gregory of Nazianzus and Maximus the Confessor brought allegorical interpretations of the great chasm to the highest level of generalisation. The evolution of understanding the great chasm reveals the shift in the conceptions of a human soul’s destiny and afterlife, its fate and deliverance from it.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Notre Père, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sferlea, G. O.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Orizonturi Teologice, (2): 124–126. 2022.\n
Publisher: EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN ORADEA\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sferlea_gregoire_2022,\n\ttitle = {Grégoire de {Nysse}, {Homélies} sur le {Notre} {Père}, texte, {Introduction} et notes de {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}, {Traduction} de {Josette} {Seguin}, {Christian} {Boudignon} et {Matthieu} {Cassin}},\n\tissn = {1582-1757},\n\turl = {https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1076301},\n\tabstract = {Review of: Gr\\&\\#233;goire de Nysse, Hom\\&\\#233;lies sur le Notre P\\&\\#232;re, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Sources Chr\\&\\#233;tiennes 596, Les \\&\\#201;ditions du Cerf, ISBN 978-2-204-12971-8, Paris, 2018, 570 p. (Lect. Univ.dr. Gheorghe Ovidiu Sferlea, University of Oradea).},\n\tlanguage = {French},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-11-29},\n\tjournal = {Orizonturi Teologice},\n\tauthor = {Sferlea, Gheorghe Ovidiu},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Publisher: EDITURA UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN ORADEA},\n\tpages = {124--126},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n Review of: Grégoire de Nysse, Homélies sur le Notre Père, texte, Introduction et notes de Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Traduction de Josette Seguin, Christian Boudignon et Matthieu Cassin, Sources Chrétiennes 596, Les Éditions du Cerf, ISBN 978-2-204-12971-8, Paris, 2018, 570 p. (Lect. Univ.dr. Gheorghe Ovidiu Sferlea, University of Oradea).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Healing the Tripartite Soul: Gregory of Nyssa’s Canonical Letter to Letoius and Its Sources.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Radde-Gallwitz, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Briggman, A.; and Scully, E., editor(s),
New Narratives for Old: The Historical Method of Reading Early Christian Theology: Essays in Honor of Michel Rene Barnes, of CUA Studies In Early Christianity, pages 163–181. Catholic University of America Press, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{radde-gallwitz_healing_2022,\n\tseries = {{CUA} {Studies} {In} {Early} {Christianity}},\n\ttitle = {Healing the {Tripartite} {Soul}: {Gregory} of {Nyssa}’s {Canonical} {Letter} to {Letoius} and {Its} {Sources}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8132-3535-6 978-0-8132-3534-9},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv2pvf6rz.13},\n\tabstract = {As Michel René Barnes has shown across a series of studies, Gregory of Nyssa was a fundamentally etiological thinker, whose impulse to peer into the root causes of things was guided by texts of the medical and the Platonic traditions. Barnes’s insight has massive implications for how we read his corpus. One text in particular, the largely neglected Canonical Letter to Letoius, displays the revolutionary capacity of Gregory’s etiological thinking. Here Gregory draws on the psychological theory of Plato and the medical method of Galen to bring order and reform to the emerging ecclesiastical tradition of canonical penance. Rather than...},\n\turldate = {2022-11-28},\n\tbooktitle = {New {Narratives} for {Old}: {The} {Historical} {Method} of {Reading} {Early} {Christian} {Theology}: {Essays} in {Honor} of {Michel} {Rene} {Barnes}},\n\tpublisher = {Catholic University of America Press},\n\tauthor = {Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew},\n\teditor = {Briggman, Anthony and Scully, Ellen},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv2pvf6rz},\n\tkeywords = {Letoi.},\n\tpages = {163--181},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n As Michel René Barnes has shown across a series of studies, Gregory of Nyssa was a fundamentally etiological thinker, whose impulse to peer into the root causes of things was guided by texts of the medical and the Platonic traditions. Barnes’s insight has massive implications for how we read his corpus. One text in particular, the largely neglected Canonical Letter to Letoius, displays the revolutionary capacity of Gregory’s etiological thinking. Here Gregory draws on the psychological theory of Plato and the medical method of Galen to bring order and reform to the emerging ecclesiastical tradition of canonical penance. Rather than...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Philo of Alexandria, Eunomius of Cyzicus, and Gregory of Nyssa on Divine Names and Power(s).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cover, M. B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Briggman, A.; and Scully, E., editor(s),
New Narratives for Old: The Historical Method of Reading Early Christian Theology: Essays in Honor of Michel Rene Barnes, of CUA Studies In Early Christianity, pages 103–122. Catholic University of America Press, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{cover_philo_2022,\n\tseries = {{CUA} {Studies} {In} {Early} {Christianity}},\n\ttitle = {Philo of {Alexandria}, {Eunomius} of {Cyzicus}, and {Gregory} of {Nyssa} on {Divine} {Names} and {Power}(s)},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8132-3535-6 978-0-8132-3534-9},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv2pvf6rz},\n\turldate = {2022-11-28},\n\tbooktitle = {New {Narratives} for {Old}: {The} {Historical} {Method} of {Reading} {Early} {Christian} {Theology}: {Essays} in {Honor} of {Michel} {Rene} {Barnes}},\n\tpublisher = {Catholic University of America Press},\n\tauthor = {Cover, Michael B.},\n\teditor = {Briggman, Anthony and Scully, Ellen},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/j.ctv2pvf6rz},\n\tkeywords = {Divine names, Eunome, Eunomius, Noms divins, Philo of Alexandria, Philon d'Alexandrie, Power, Puissance},\n\tpages = {103--122},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Littérature et histoire du christianisme ancien.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Crégheur, E.; Aubin, J.; Fanguet, A.; McDowell, G.; Painchaud, L.; Poirier, P.; St-Arnault-Chiasson, S.; Therrien, P.; Tissot, B.; and Vadnais, Y.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Laval théologique et philosophique, 78(1): 117–184. 2022.\n
p. 177-178 : Canévet-Vinel ; p. 183-184 : Maraval\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{cregheur_litterature_2022,\n\ttitle = {Littérature et histoire du christianisme ancien},\n\tvolume = {78},\n\tissn = {0023-9054, 1703-8804},\n\turl = {https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/ltp/2022-v78-n1-ltp07428/1093378ar/},\n\tdoi = {10.7202/1093378ar},\n\tabstract = {Un article de la revue Laval théologique et philosophique, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.},\n\tlanguage = {fr},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2022-11-22},\n\tjournal = {Laval théologique et philosophique},\n\tauthor = {Crégheur, Eric and Aubin, Jeffery and Fanguet, Alice and McDowell, Gavin and Painchaud, Louis and Poirier, Paul-Hubert and St-Arnault-Chiasson, Simon and Therrien, Philippe and Tissot, Benoît and Vadnais, Yann},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {p. 177-178 : Canévet-Vinel ; p. 183-184 : Maraval},\n\tpages = {117--184},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n Un article de la revue Laval théologique et philosophique, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n An Ontological Freedom: The Origins of the Notion in Gregory of Nyssa and its Influence unto the Italian Renaissance.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bastitta Harriet, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Patristic Studies in Global PerspectiveBrill, Schöningh, Leiden, Boston, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{bastitta_harriet_ontological_2022,\n\taddress = {Leiden, Boston},\n\tseries = {Patristic {Studies} in {Global} {Perspective}},\n\ttitle = {An {Ontological} {Freedom}: {The} {Origins} of the {Notion} in {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and its {Influence} unto the {Italian} {Renaissance}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-657-79506-2},\n\tshorttitle = {An {Ontological} {Freedom}},\n\turl = {https://brill.com/view/title/61084},\n\tabstract = {"An Ontological Freedom" published on 05 Dec 2022 by Brill {\\textbar} Schöningh.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2022-11-03},\n\tpublisher = {Brill, Schöningh},\n\tauthor = {Bastitta Harriet, Francisco},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Freedom, Liberté, Reception, Renaissance, Réception},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \"An Ontological Freedom\" published on 05 Dec 2022 by Brill \\textbar Schöningh.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n St. Macrina the Younger: The Mystagogy of Ascending Descent in Christ.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Silvas, A. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Springer, D. W.; and Clarke, K. M., editor(s),
Patristic Spirituality. Classical Perspectives on Ascent in the Journey to God, of Studies in Theology and Religion, pages 231–241. Brill, Leiden, Boston, 2022.\n
Pages: 231-241 Section: Patristic Spirituality\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{silvas_st_2022,\n\taddress = {Leiden, Boston},\n\tseries = {Studies in {Theology} and {Religion}},\n\ttitle = {St. {Macrina} the {Younger}: {The} {Mystagogy} of {Ascending} {Descent} in {Christ}},\n\tisbn = {978-90-04-52698-3},\n\turl = {https://brill.com/view/book/9789004526983/BP000021.xml},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {30},\n\turldate = {2022-10-24},\n\tbooktitle = {Patristic {Spirituality}. {Classical} {Perspectives} on {Ascent} in the {Journey} to {God}},\n\tpublisher = {Brill},\n\tauthor = {Silvas, Anna M.},\n\teditor = {Springer, Don W. and Clarke, Kevin M.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1163/9789004526983_014},\n\tnote = {Pages: 231-241\nSection: Patristic Spirituality},\n\tkeywords = {Ascension vers Dieu, Ascent towards God, Macrina, Macrine},\n\tpages = {231--241},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Nomad Thought: Using Gregory of Nyssa and Deleuze and Guattari to Deterritorialize Mysticism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Conty, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Religions, 13(10): 882. 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{conty_nomad_2022,\n\ttitle = {Nomad {Thought}: {Using} {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and {Deleuze} and {Guattari} to {Deterritorialize} {Mysticism}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tissn = {2077-1444},\n\tshorttitle = {Nomad {Thought}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/882},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/rel13100882},\n\tabstract = {This article compares the mysticism of 4th-century Church Father Gregory of Nyssa to the nomadology of 20th century philosophers Deleuze and Guattari. In their book A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari returned to the figure of the nomad in order to free multiplicities from the “despotic unity” of modern Enlightenment thought. Though Deleuze and Guattari compare this nomadology to spiritual journeys, they claim that their nomad, unlike the mystic, resists a center, a homecoming, a destination. Yet Gregory of Nyssa, writing before the Church itself became a hegemonic power that would confine truth to a single reified code, described the Christian as a wandering nomad, for whom the path itself is the goal. Contrary to the static vision that would be developed in the onto-theological tradition that would lead Western metaphysics to interpret mysticism as the private experience of union with the divine, Gregory of Nyssa proposes a communal movement “from beginning to beginning” with no end, and no union in sight. By placing the postmodern secular nomad alongside the premodern Christian nomad, this article will draw on similarities between the two in order to accentuate the contemporary relevance of Gregory of Nyssa’s vision of mysticism.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {10},\n\turldate = {2022-09-27},\n\tjournal = {Religions},\n\tauthor = {Conty, Arianne},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Deleuze, Gilles, Modern Theology, Mysticism, Mystique, Reception, Réception, Théologie moderne},\n\tpages = {882},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n This article compares the mysticism of 4th-century Church Father Gregory of Nyssa to the nomadology of 20th century philosophers Deleuze and Guattari. In their book A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari returned to the figure of the nomad in order to free multiplicities from the “despotic unity” of modern Enlightenment thought. Though Deleuze and Guattari compare this nomadology to spiritual journeys, they claim that their nomad, unlike the mystic, resists a center, a homecoming, a destination. Yet Gregory of Nyssa, writing before the Church itself became a hegemonic power that would confine truth to a single reified code, described the Christian as a wandering nomad, for whom the path itself is the goal. Contrary to the static vision that would be developed in the onto-theological tradition that would lead Western metaphysics to interpret mysticism as the private experience of union with the divine, Gregory of Nyssa proposes a communal movement “from beginning to beginning” with no end, and no union in sight. By placing the postmodern secular nomad alongside the premodern Christian nomad, this article will draw on similarities between the two in order to accentuate the contemporary relevance of Gregory of Nyssa’s vision of mysticism.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Anagogical Exegesis: Gregory of Nyssa and Moses’ Ascent of Mount Sinai.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Conway-Jones, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Springer, D. W.; and Clarke, K. M., editor(s),
Patristic Spirituality Classical Perspectives on Ascent in the Journey to God, of Studies in Theology and Religion, pages 242–258. Brill, Leiden, Boston, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{conway-jones_anagogical_2022,\n\taddress = {Leiden, Boston},\n\tseries = {Studies in {Theology} and {Religion}},\n\ttitle = {Anagogical {Exegesis}: {Gregory} of {Nyssa} and {Moses}’ {Ascent} of {Mount} {Sinai}},\n\tisbn = {978-90-04-52698-3},\n\turl = {https://brill.com/view/book/9789004526983/BP000022.xml},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {30},\n\turldate = {2022-09-24},\n\tbooktitle = {Patristic {Spirituality} {Classical} {Perspectives} on {Ascent} in the {Journey} to {God}},\n\tpublisher = {Brill},\n\tauthor = {Conway-Jones, Ann},\n\teditor = {Springer, Don W. and Clarke, Kevin M.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1163/9789004526983_015},\n\tkeywords = {Ascension vers Dieu, Ascent towards God, Exegesis, Exégèse, Moys.},\n\tpages = {242--258},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n Macrina the Younger as a Substitute for Eustathius the Philosopher /Eustathius of Sebastea. Establishing Peter at the See of Sebastea.\n \n \n\n\n \n Przyszychowska, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Center for Development of Research and Education, Warsaw, 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{przyszychowska_macrina_2022,\n\taddress = {Warsaw},\n\ttitle = {Macrina the {Younger} as a {Substitute} for {Eustathius} the {Philosopher} /{Eustathius} of {Sebastea}. {Establishing} {Peter} at the {See} of {Sebastea}},\n\tisbn = {978-83-963786-4-4},\n\tpublisher = {Center for Development of Research and Education},\n\tauthor = {Przyszychowska, Marta},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {An. et res., Eustathe de Sébastée, Eustathius of Sebasteia, Macr., Macrina, Macrine, Peter of Sebasteia, Pierre de Sébastée},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n Why Was St Gregory of Nyssa Never Condemned for His Doctrine of Apokatastasis?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ramelli, I. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia, 67(2): 135–157. August 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n link\n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ramelli_why_2022,\n\ttitle = {Why {Was} {St} {Gregory} of {Nyssa} {Never} {Condemned} for {His} {Doctrine} of {Apokatastasis}?},\n\tvolume = {67},\n\tissn = {20659407},\n\turl = {http://www.studia.ubbcluj.ro/arhiva/abstract_en.php?editie=PHILOSOPHIA&nr=2&an=2022&id_art=19514},\n\tdoi = {10.24193/subbphil.2022.2.08},\n\tabstract = {"This article will first point out that St Gregory of Nyssa supported the doctrine of apokatastasis or universal restoration as grounded in Christ and in defence of Christian “orthodoxy” against Arian tendencies—as Origen, his great inspirer, had done against “Gnosticism”. In light of this, the reason why Gregory’s doctrine of apokatastasis was never condemned by the Church (differently from the case of Origen) will be asked, and several potential answers, which reinforce one another, will be offered. Finally, the essay will highlight the role of Gregory as a touchstone of orthodoxy. Keywords: St Gregory of Nyssa, Origen, St Maximus the Confessor, Patriarch Germanus I of Constantinople, Apokatastasis, Christocentrism, Orthodoxy, Purgatory, St Basil, St Naucratius, St Theosebia"},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-08-29},\n\tjournal = {Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philosophia},\n\tauthor = {Ramelli, Ilaria L.E.},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Apocatastase, Apokatastasis, Reception, Réception},\n\tpages = {135--157},\n}\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \"This article will first point out that St Gregory of Nyssa supported the doctrine of apokatastasis or universal restoration as grounded in Christ and in defence of Christian “orthodoxy” against Arian tendencies—as Origen, his great inspirer, had done against “Gnosticism”. In light of this, the reason why Gregory’s doctrine of apokatastasis was never condemned by the Church (differently from the case of Origen) will be asked, and several potential answers, which reinforce one another, will be offered. Finally, the essay will highlight the role of Gregory as a touchstone of orthodoxy. Keywords: St Gregory of Nyssa, Origen, St Maximus the Confessor, Patriarch Germanus I of Constantinople, Apokatastasis, Christocentrism, Orthodoxy, Purgatory, St Basil, St Naucratius, St Theosebia\"\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n