\n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Problem of Anonymity in Archives: A Literature Review.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Emily Ross.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Bilgi Dünyası, 14(2): 240–250. October 2013.\n
0 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2023-03-20]\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ross_problem_2013,\n\ttitle = {The {Problem} of {Anonymity} in {Archives}: {A} {Literature} {Review}},\n\tvolume = {14},\n\tissn = {2148-354X},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Problem} of {Anonymity} in {Archives}},\n\turl = {https://bd.org.tr/index.php/bd/article/view/119},\n\tdoi = {10.15612/BD.2013.119},\n\tabstract = {Archivists processing documents rely on factors such as authorship and provenance to contextualize their materials and render them searchable. But in my past experience as an archives user, I repeatedly came across instances of anonymity: letters and diaries by unnamed authors or to unknown recipients, photographs of unknown subjects. In some cases this anonymity is a loss of information that was once there, but in other case it enabled the material to come into existence in the first place: such as in the case of satirical political poetry, for which a writer might face legal censure. In this literature review, the issue of anonymity in the archives is explored, both in a pragmatic sense (recommended strategies for managing it), and a philosophical sense (according anonymous documents the same status as documents with known authors).},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Bilgi Dünyası},\n\tauthor = {Ross, Emily},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {0 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2023-03-20]},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource},\n\tpages = {240--250},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Archivists processing documents rely on factors such as authorship and provenance to contextualize their materials and render them searchable. But in my past experience as an archives user, I repeatedly came across instances of anonymity: letters and diaries by unnamed authors or to unknown recipients, photographs of unknown subjects. In some cases this anonymity is a loss of information that was once there, but in other case it enabled the material to come into existence in the first place: such as in the case of satirical political poetry, for which a writer might face legal censure. In this literature review, the issue of anonymity in the archives is explored, both in a pragmatic sense (recommended strategies for managing it), and a philosophical sense (according anonymous documents the same status as documents with known authors).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather Hill.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Library & Information Science Research, 35(2): 137–142. April 2013.\n
98 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2023-03-20]\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{hill_disability_2013,\n\ttitle = {Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: {A} content analysis},\n\tvolume = {35},\n\tissn = {07408188},\n\tshorttitle = {Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature},\n\turl = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0740818813000030},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002},\n\tabstract = {The library profession is a strong and vocal proponent of increased information access for people with disabilities. With the discipline's longstanding interest in the subject of services to people with disabilities, questions arise about how the profession perceives the phenomenon. How is library and information science (LIS), as a discipline, conceptualizing disability and accessibility? A content analysis of the LIS literature was conducted to examine this question. The literature provides a fertile ground for study as it reflects the profession's approaches to, and perceptions of, a topic. This research identifies the major issues and trends in the research about accessibility and disability in the LIS literature throughout a 10-year period, 2000–2010. The strongest theme in the literature is accessibility as it relates to web, database, and software, while the prevailing disability of focus is visual disabilities. The overall environment emphasizes technology more than attitudinal aspects associated with disabilities. The research could benefit from increased direct participation of people with disabilities.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-08-15},\n\tjournal = {Library \\& Information Science Research},\n\tauthor = {Hill, Heather},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {98 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2023-03-20]},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource},\n\tpages = {137--142},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The library profession is a strong and vocal proponent of increased information access for people with disabilities. With the discipline's longstanding interest in the subject of services to people with disabilities, questions arise about how the profession perceives the phenomenon. How is library and information science (LIS), as a discipline, conceptualizing disability and accessibility? A content analysis of the LIS literature was conducted to examine this question. The literature provides a fertile ground for study as it reflects the profession's approaches to, and perceptions of, a topic. This research identifies the major issues and trends in the research about accessibility and disability in the LIS literature throughout a 10-year period, 2000–2010. The strongest theme in the literature is accessibility as it relates to web, database, and software, while the prevailing disability of focus is visual disabilities. The overall environment emphasizes technology more than attitudinal aspects associated with disabilities. The research could benefit from increased direct participation of people with disabilities.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Breaking Down the Barriers: Creating Empathetic Ontologies for LAMBDA Initiative.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Francis Nichols; and Edwin M. Cortez.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Tennessee Libraries, 63(1). 2013.\n
Number: 1 ECC: No Data (logprob: -173.455) tex.ids: nicholsBreakingBarriersCreating2013a\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{nichols_breaking_2013,\n\ttitle = {Breaking {Down} the {Barriers}: {Creating} {Empathetic} {Ontologies} for {LAMBDA} {Initiative}},\n\tvolume = {63},\n\turl = {https://www.tnla.org/page/529},\n\tabstract = {Public libraries frequently serve the role of an access point to technology for people who are homeless or who do not have access to these technologies at home and need the services provided by libraries. This role has become increasingly important in a predominately digital age. Homeless Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered and Questioning (LGBTQ) individuals are among the growing population of society without access to technology outside of the library. As an institution, the public library is metamorphosing from its traditional boundaries to provide a broader function as the heart of the community for socially marginalized youths. Public libraries have historically played a role in identifying social obligation and helping the disenfranchised become selfsufficient and productive citizens through inclusion and access to resources; a parallel can be found in the libraries' role in aiding disenfranchised LGBTQ youth. The library can create a welcoming, positive, and useful environment by using the social vernacular of LGBTQ society to create empathetic ontologies within the Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC). Ontologies within the framework of libraries are shared vocabularies that connect the definitions of ideas, concepts and objects to their properties and relationships to each other. The Libraries as Models for Building Diversity Achievements (LAMBDA) project addresses the complex issue of educating librarians to the sensitivities of the LGBTQ community. The pilot program for LAMBDA is a joint effort of libraries within the cities of San Francisco, CA and Knoxville, TN. This paper argues that a constructed ontology is needed for this target group of homeless youths (18-25) who are LGBTQ; it describes how to create an empathetic ontology as a navigation tool to engage the LGBTQ community and its usefulness within the LAMBDA initiative.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Tennessee Libraries},\n\tauthor = {Nichols, Francis and Cortez, Edwin M.},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nECC: No Data (logprob: -173.455) \ntex.ids: nicholsBreakingBarriersCreating2013a},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, ⛔ No DOI found},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Public libraries frequently serve the role of an access point to technology for people who are homeless or who do not have access to these technologies at home and need the services provided by libraries. This role has become increasingly important in a predominately digital age. Homeless Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered and Questioning (LGBTQ) individuals are among the growing population of society without access to technology outside of the library. As an institution, the public library is metamorphosing from its traditional boundaries to provide a broader function as the heart of the community for socially marginalized youths. Public libraries have historically played a role in identifying social obligation and helping the disenfranchised become selfsufficient and productive citizens through inclusion and access to resources; a parallel can be found in the libraries' role in aiding disenfranchised LGBTQ youth. The library can create a welcoming, positive, and useful environment by using the social vernacular of LGBTQ society to create empathetic ontologies within the Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC). Ontologies within the framework of libraries are shared vocabularies that connect the definitions of ideas, concepts and objects to their properties and relationships to each other. The Libraries as Models for Building Diversity Achievements (LAMBDA) project addresses the complex issue of educating librarians to the sensitivities of the LGBTQ community. The pilot program for LAMBDA is a joint effort of libraries within the cities of San Francisco, CA and Knoxville, TN. This paper argues that a constructed ontology is needed for this target group of homeless youths (18-25) who are LGBTQ; it describes how to create an empathetic ontology as a navigation tool to engage the LGBTQ community and its usefulness within the LAMBDA initiative.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Classifying the Margins: Using Alternative Classification Schemes to Empower Diverse and Marginalized Users.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Catelynne Sahadath.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Feliciter, 59(3): 15. 2013.\n
Number: 3 ECC: No Data (logprob: -204.811)\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sahadath_classifying_2013,\n\ttitle = {Classifying the {Margins}: {Using} {Alternative} {Classification} {Schemes} to {Empower} {Diverse} and {Marginalized} {Users}},\n\tvolume = {59},\n\turl = {http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/88179536/classifying-margins-using-alternative-classification-schemes-empower-diverse-marginalized-users},\n\tabstract = {The article discusses the use of alternative classification systems to improve library services to diverse and marginalized populations in Canada. The shortcomings of popular classification systems such as the Library of Congress (LC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme are mentioned. The federal institution Library and Archives Canada (LAC) has addressed this issue by making additions to the LC scheme. Another alternative is the Brian Deer Classification System.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Feliciter},\n\tauthor = {Sahadath, Catelynne},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {Number: 3\nECC: No Data (logprob: -204.811)},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, information retrieval, metadata, ⛔ No DOI found},\n\tpages = {15},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The article discusses the use of alternative classification systems to improve library services to diverse and marginalized populations in Canada. The shortcomings of popular classification systems such as the Library of Congress (LC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme are mentioned. The federal institution Library and Archives Canada (LAC) has addressed this issue by making additions to the LC scheme. Another alternative is the Brian Deer Classification System.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Radical Cataloging : From Words to Action Part I . Radical Cataloging : An Overview.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather Lember; Suzanne Lipkin; and Richard Jung Lee.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Urban Library Journal. 2013.\n
ECC: No Data (logprob: -100.842)\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{lember_radical_2013,\n\ttitle = {Radical {Cataloging} : {From} {Words} to {Action} {Part} {I} . {Radical} {Cataloging} : {An} {Overview}},\n\tissn = {19449674},\n\tabstract = {Radical cataloging seeks to give a voice to people and concepts that are difficult to access through library subject searches. This article will explore four areas of radical cataloging: cataloging rules and the inequities and hierarchical problems inherent in classification itself, the use of cataloging to further a cause, the challenges of language in subject headings; and cataloging efforts around unconventional collections, such as zines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},\n\tjournal = {Urban Library Journal},\n\tauthor = {Lember, Heather and Lipkin, Suzanne and Lee, Richard Jung},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {ECC: No Data (logprob: -100.842)},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, radical cataloging, radical reference, ⛔ No DOI found},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Radical cataloging seeks to give a voice to people and concepts that are difficult to access through library subject searches. This article will explore four areas of radical cataloging: cataloging rules and the inequities and hierarchical problems inherent in classification itself, the use of cataloging to further a cause, the challenges of language in subject headings; and cataloging efforts around unconventional collections, such as zines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Library classifications criticisms: universality, poststructuralism and ethics.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Daniel MARTÍNEZ Avila; and José Augusto CHAVES Guimarães.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
. ISSN,6. 2013.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{avilaLibraryClassificationsCriticisms2013,\n\ttitle = {Library classifications criticisms: universality, poststructuralism and ethics},\n\tabstract = {We study library classifications criticisms from a poststructuralist and pragmatist point of view that rejects the idea of universality in knowledge organization systems. From this perspective, we analize the seminal texts on library classifications criticisms and conclude that the seek of neutrality in some of these texts is not only an impossible goal but also a contradiction in the representation of different cultures. Therefore, we suggest the commitment with the goals and the recognition of bias in library classifications as an important device for achieving a transcultural ethics in knowledge organization and representation.},\n\tlanguage = {english},\n\tjournal = {. ISSN},\n\tauthor = {Avila, Daniel MARTÍNEZ and Guimarães, José Augusto CHAVES},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, ⛔ No DOI found},\n\tpages = {6},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n We study library classifications criticisms from a poststructuralist and pragmatist point of view that rejects the idea of universality in knowledge organization systems. From this perspective, we analize the seminal texts on library classifications criticisms and conclude that the seek of neutrality in some of these texts is not only an impossible goal but also a contradiction in the representation of different cultures. Therefore, we suggest the commitment with the goals and the recognition of bias in library classifications as an important device for achieving a transcultural ethics in knowledge organization and representation.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Library classifications criticisms: universality, postestructuralism and ethics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Daniel Martinez Avila; and José Augusto Chaves Guimarães.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Scire: representación y organización del conocimiento,21–26. September 2013.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{avila_library_2013,\n\ttitle = {Library classifications criticisms: universality, postestructuralism and ethics},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {2340-7042},\n\tshorttitle = {Library classifications criticisms},\n\turl = {https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/scire/article/view/4081},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tSe estudian las críticas a las clasificaciones bibliotecarias desde un punto de vista postestructuralista y pragmatista que se opone al ideal de universalidad en los sistemas de organización del conocimiento. Desde esta perspectiva se hace una revisión de los textos seminales de uno de los autores pioneros en estudios críticos sobre clasificaciones bibliotecarias y se concluye que pese a la búsqueda de neutralidad que impregna algunos de los estudios críticos, éste se trata de un imposible a la vez que contradictorio en la representación de diferentes culturas. El compromiso con el propósito del sistema y la reivindicación de los sesgos se convierten por lo tanto en unos de los principales mecanismos para una ética transcultural en organización y representación del conocimiento.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-06-24},\n\tjournal = {Scire: representación y organización del conocimiento},\n\tauthor = {Avila, Daniel Martinez and Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, Bias, Ethics, Knowledge organization and representation, Library classifications, Poststructuralism, Pragmatism, Universality, ⛔ No DOI found},\n\tpages = {21--26},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Resumen Se estudian las críticas a las clasificaciones bibliotecarias desde un punto de vista postestructuralista y pragmatista que se opone al ideal de universalidad en los sistemas de organización del conocimiento. Desde esta perspectiva se hace una revisión de los textos seminales de uno de los autores pioneros en estudios críticos sobre clasificaciones bibliotecarias y se concluye que pese a la búsqueda de neutralidad que impregna algunos de los estudios críticos, éste se trata de un imposible a la vez que contradictorio en la representación de diferentes culturas. El compromiso con el propósito del sistema y la reivindicación de los sesgos se convierten por lo tanto en unos de los principales mecanismos para una ética transcultural en organización y representación del conocimiento.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n