var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F2665025%2Fcollections%2FJLDU8IQ2%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DsDvVf0fWw9SUkdbUv38lz9gb%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&theme=mila&groupby=author_short&fullnames=1&jsonp=1&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F2665025%2Fcollections%2FJLDU8IQ2%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DsDvVf0fWw9SUkdbUv38lz9gb%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&theme=mila&groupby=author_short&fullnames=1&jsonp=1\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F2665025%2Fcollections%2FJLDU8IQ2%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DsDvVf0fWw9SUkdbUv38lz9gb%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&theme=mila&groupby=author_short&fullnames=1&jsonp=1\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
  2. \n
  3. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
  4. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n Amrine, F.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Music of the Organism: Uexküll, Merleau-Ponty, Zuckerkandl, and Deleuze as Goethean Ecologists in Search of a New Paradigm.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Frederick Amrine.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 45–72. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 4 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{amrine_music_2015,\n\ttitle = {The {Music} of the {Organism}: {Uexküll}, {Merleau}-{Ponty}, {Zuckerkandl}, and {Deleuze} as {Goethean} {Ecologists} in {Search} of a {New} {Paradigm}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Music} of the {Organism}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.amrine.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0006},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Amrine, Frederick},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {45--72},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Bergthaller, H.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n On Human Involution: Posthumanist Anthropology and the Question of Ecology in the Work of Hans Blumenberg and Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hannes Bergthaller.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 83–104. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OnPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bergthaller_human_2016,\n\ttitle = {On {Human} {Involution}: {Posthumanist} {Anthropology} and the {Question} of {Ecology} in the {Work} of {Hans} {Blumenberg} and {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {On {Human} {Involution}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511883},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511883},\n\tabstract = {Scholars in the environmental humanities frequently argue that a clear understanding of humanity's ecological embeddedness is sufficient to dismantle the anthropocentric biases of traditional humanism. Following Hans Blumenberg's interpretation of the Copernican turn, this article argues that the proponents of this view fail to recognize that the desire to overcome anthropocentrism was central to Enlightenment thought. Like the latter, ecological posthumanism accords itself cognitive privileges that presuppose a successful distantiation of the world. According to Blumenberg's anthropology, the need to turn away from the world in order to engage with it is a distinctly human trait. However, second-order cybernetics and Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory offer ways to conceptualize this “involution” as a general feature of living things, whose relative autonomy is predicated on the possibility of operational closure.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Bergthaller, Hannes},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {83--104},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Scholars in the environmental humanities frequently argue that a clear understanding of humanity's ecological embeddedness is sufficient to dismantle the anthropocentric biases of traditional humanism. Following Hans Blumenberg's interpretation of the Copernican turn, this article argues that the proponents of this view fail to recognize that the desire to overcome anthropocentrism was central to Enlightenment thought. Like the latter, ecological posthumanism accords itself cognitive privileges that presuppose a successful distantiation of the world. According to Blumenberg's anthropology, the need to turn away from the world in order to engage with it is a distinctly human trait. However, second-order cybernetics and Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory offer ways to conceptualize this “involution” as a general feature of living things, whose relative autonomy is predicated on the possibility of operational closure.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Biro, A.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Critical Ecologies: The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Andrew Biro.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{biro_critical_2011,\n\taddress = {Toronto},\n\ttitle = {Critical {Ecologies}: {The} {Frankfurt} {School} and {Contemporary} {Environmental} {Crises}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8020-9565-7},\n\tshorttitle = {Critical {Ecologies}},\n\tabstract = {Critical Ecologies aims to redeem the theories of major Frankfurt thinkers-Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse, among others-by applying them to contemporary environmental crises.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {University of Toronto Press},\n\tauthor = {Biro, Andrew},\n\tcollaborator = {Biro, Andrew},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tdoi = {10.3138/9781442661660},\n\tkeywords = {Critical theory, Ecology, Human ecology, Philosophy, Political Science, Social ecology},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Critical Ecologies aims to redeem the theories of major Frankfurt thinkers-Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse, among others-by applying them to contemporary environmental crises.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Bradley, H.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rumors of Nature: An Ecotranslation of Ulrike Almut Sandig’s “so habe ich sagen gehört”.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hannah Bradley.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 14. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"RumorsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bradley_rumors_2021,\n\ttitle = {Rumors of {Nature}: {An} {Ecotranslation} of {Ulrike} {Almut} {Sandig}’s “so habe ich sagen gehört”},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Rumors of {Nature}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/14},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010014},\n\tabstract = {Only recently have scholars begun to discuss the implications of the Anthropocene for the translation of literature, introducing the new practice and study of ecotranslation. The Anthropocene\\&mdash;a term popularized by Paul Crutzen\\&mdash;describes the current epoch as one where human activity gains a large negative impact on geology and ecosystems. In light of this, an ecological approach to translation is not only useful but necessary for addressing the complex relationship between humans and the natural world. Ecotranslation can be understood as translation that recognizes and retains ecological themes from the source text. This study looks at the application of ecotranslation theory to an English translation of the German poem \\&ldquo;so habe ich sagen geh\\&ouml;rt\\&rdquo; by Ulrike Almut Sandig. The poem critiques preconceived notions about how humans relate to and conceptualize nature, making it an ideal source for applying ecotranslation. Through a close reading and interpretation of the poem, its ecological features are noted, then close attention is given to their translation. Comparison of the ecotranslation with an existing translation displays that an ecological approach can lead to a particular recognition and emphasis of ecological aspects. The resulting translation differs significantly from those translations lacking an ecological emphasis.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Bradley, Hannah},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {Anthropocene, Ulrike Almut Sandig, ecocriticism, ecopoetry, ecotranslation, translation},\n\tpages = {14},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Only recently have scholars begun to discuss the implications of the Anthropocene for the translation of literature, introducing the new practice and study of ecotranslation. The Anthropocene—a term popularized by Paul Crutzen—describes the current epoch as one where human activity gains a large negative impact on geology and ecosystems. In light of this, an ecological approach to translation is not only useful but necessary for addressing the complex relationship between humans and the natural world. Ecotranslation can be understood as translation that recognizes and retains ecological themes from the source text. This study looks at the application of ecotranslation theory to an English translation of the German poem “so habe ich sagen gehört” by Ulrike Almut Sandig. The poem critiques preconceived notions about how humans relate to and conceptualize nature, making it an ideal source for applying ecotranslation. Through a close reading and interpretation of the poem, its ecological features are noted, then close attention is given to their translation. Comparison of the ecotranslation with an existing translation displays that an ecological approach can lead to a particular recognition and emphasis of ecological aspects. The resulting translation differs significantly from those translations lacking an ecological emphasis.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Braunbeck, H.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Past Erased, the Future Stolen: Lignite Extractivism as Germany’s Trope for the Anthropocene.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Helga G. Braunbeck.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 10. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{braunbeck_past_2021,\n\ttitle = {The {Past} {Erased}, the {Future} {Stolen}: {Lignite} {Extractivism} as {Germany}’s {Trope} for the {Anthropocene}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Past} {Erased}, the {Future} {Stolen}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/10},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010010},\n\tabstract = {Coal, and even more so, brown coal or lignite, is currently under-researched in the energy humanities. Lignite still provides approximately 25\\% of \\&ldquo;green\\&rdquo; Germany\\&rsquo;s energy; its extraction obliterates human settlements and vibrant ecosystems, and its incineration produces more CO2 than any other fossil fuel, contributing massively to climate change. After discussing German mining history, the genres of the energy narrative, the bioregional novel, and ecopoetry, and earlier literary treatments of lignite mining, I analyze recent lignite novels by Anja Wedershoven, Andreas Apelt, Bernhard Sinkel, and Ingrid Bach\\&eacute;r, and ecopoems by Max Czollek and Marion Poschmann. I discuss socioenvironmental issues such as \\&ldquo;slow violence\\&rdquo; and \\&ldquo;environmental injustice\\&rdquo; enacted upon rural communities that are being resettled in \\&ldquo;sacrifice zones\\&rdquo; for national energy needs; political\\&ndash;economic entanglements, and activism against this complete devastation of the naturalcultural landscape; differences in representation in narrative and lyrical texts; and how the authors frame local perceptions of the mining operations and the resulting \\&ldquo;moonscape\\&rdquo; within the larger temporal and spatial scales of the Anthropocene. I argue that these literary texts prefigure where the Earth may be headed in the Anthropocene, and that Germany\\&rsquo;s lignite extractivism can be considered a trope for the Anthropocene.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Braunbeck, Helga G.},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {Anthropocene, bioregional novel, ecopoetry, energy narrative, environmental justice, extractivism, lignite mining, sacrifice zone, slow violence, temporality},\n\tpages = {10},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Coal, and even more so, brown coal or lignite, is currently under-researched in the energy humanities. Lignite still provides approximately 25% of “green” Germany’s energy; its extraction obliterates human settlements and vibrant ecosystems, and its incineration produces more CO2 than any other fossil fuel, contributing massively to climate change. After discussing German mining history, the genres of the energy narrative, the bioregional novel, and ecopoetry, and earlier literary treatments of lignite mining, I analyze recent lignite novels by Anja Wedershoven, Andreas Apelt, Bernhard Sinkel, and Ingrid Bachér, and ecopoems by Max Czollek and Marion Poschmann. I discuss socioenvironmental issues such as “slow violence” and “environmental injustice” enacted upon rural communities that are being resettled in “sacrifice zones” for national energy needs; political–economic entanglements, and activism against this complete devastation of the naturalcultural landscape; differences in representation in narrative and lyrical texts; and how the authors frame local perceptions of the mining operations and the resulting “moonscape” within the larger temporal and spatial scales of the Anthropocene. I argue that these literary texts prefigure where the Earth may be headed in the Anthropocene, and that Germany’s lignite extractivism can be considered a trope for the Anthropocene.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Recent German Ecocriticism in Interdisciplinary Context.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Helga G. Braunbeck.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Monatshefte (Madison, Wis. : 1946), 111(1): 117–135. 2019.\n Publisher: University of Wisconsin Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{braunbeck_recent_2019,\n\ttitle = {Recent {German} {Ecocriticism} in {Interdisciplinary} {Context}},\n\tvolume = {111},\n\tissn = {0026-9271},\n\tdoi = {10.3368/m.111.1.117},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Monatshefte (Madison, Wis. : 1946)},\n\tauthor = {Braunbeck, Helga G.},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {Publisher: University of Wisconsin Press},\n\tkeywords = {Dürbeck, Schaumann, Wilke, Heidenreich, Schmitt, Dürbeck, Gabriele,, editor, editor., Caroline, ---- editor., Sabine, ---- editor., Sybille, --, Claudia, editor., Claudia},\n\tpages = {117--135},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Burnett, K.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Ableist Human: Rethinking Agency with Ability through Max Frisch's Man in the Holocene.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kassi S. Burnett.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studies in the Humanities, 46(1-2): 62–82. March 2020.\n Publisher: Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Department of English\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{burnett_ableist_2020,\n\ttitle = {The {Ableist} {Human}: {Rethinking} {Agency} with {Ability} through {Max} {Frisch}'s {Man} in the {Holocene}},\n\tvolume = {46},\n\tissn = {00393800},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Ableist} {Human}},\n\turl = {https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=LitRC&sw=w&issn=00393800&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA673944093&sid=googleScholar&linkaccess=abs},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {1-2},\n\turldate = {2021-11-12},\n\tjournal = {Studies in the Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Burnett, Kassi S.},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Department of English},\n\tpages = {62--82},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Fridays for Future zwischen Ökologie und Gerechtigkeit. Eine Instagram-Fallstudie.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kassi Burnett; and May Mergenthaler.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ökologie. Special issue of Non Fiktion: Arsenal der anderen Gattungen, 16(1): 231–362. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FridaysPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{burnett_fridays_2021,\n\ttitle = {Fridays for {Future} zwischen Ökologie und {Gerechtigkeit}. {Eine} {Instagram}-{Fallstudie}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\turl = {https://www.wehrhahn-verlag.de/public/index.php?ID_Section=1&ID_Category=17&ID_Product=1432},\n\tabstract = {In their paper, Mergenthaler first analyzes the innovative and unique character of Fridays for Future as an environmental youth movement, in comparison with precursors like the anti-nuclear movement. On this basis, the authors explore how FFF presents its two main issues—the fight against climate change and for climate justice—on its Instagram account, focusing on the especially active account of Fridays for Future Germany. They find that the social medium of Instagram presents many opportunities to combine these issues, e.g., by presenting stories by activists from all around the world, including regions already strongly impacted by global warming. However, Mergenthaler and Burnett also note that the tension between environmentalism and social justice remains unresolved. FFF’s main cause is the protection of nature and the survival of humanity based on the insights of climate science, but the movement leaves open for debate the more clearly political question of how to make that survival fair.},\n\tlanguage = {German},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Ökologie. Special issue of Non Fiktion: Arsenal der anderen Gattungen},\n\tauthor = {Burnett, Kassi and Mergenthaler, May},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {231--362},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In their paper, Mergenthaler first analyzes the innovative and unique character of Fridays for Future as an environmental youth movement, in comparison with precursors like the anti-nuclear movement. On this basis, the authors explore how FFF presents its two main issues—the fight against climate change and for climate justice—on its Instagram account, focusing on the especially active account of Fridays for Future Germany. They find that the social medium of Instagram presents many opportunities to combine these issues, e.g., by presenting stories by activists from all around the world, including regions already strongly impacted by global warming. However, Mergenthaler and Burnett also note that the tension between environmentalism and social justice remains unresolved. FFF’s main cause is the protection of nature and the survival of humanity based on the insights of climate science, but the movement leaves open for debate the more clearly political question of how to make that survival fair.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Böhme, G.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Goethe und die moderne Zivilisation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gernot Böhme.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 133–141. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GoethePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bohme_goethe_2015,\n\ttitle = {Goethe und die moderne {Zivilisation}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.bohme.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0030},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Böhme, Gernot},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {133--141},\n}\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Böhme, H.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Natur und Subjekt.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hartmut Böhme.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Edition SuhrkampSuhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1. Aufl. edition, 1988.\n HOLLIS number: 990020515110203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{bohme_natur_1988,\n\taddress = {Frankfurt am Main},\n\tedition = {1. Aufl.},\n\tseries = {Edition {Suhrkamp}},\n\ttitle = {Natur und {Subjekt}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-518-11470-4},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tnumber = {1470},\n\tpublisher = {Suhrkamp},\n\tauthor = {Böhme, Hartmut},\n\tyear = {1988},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990020515110203941},\n\tkeywords = {Comparative literature, Literature, Nature (Aesthetics), Nature in literature., Philosophy, Themes, motives.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Bühler, B.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecocriticism: eine Einführung.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Benjamin Bühler.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n JBMetzler Verlag, Stuttgart, 2016.\n HOLLIS number: 990147473830203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{buhler_ecocriticism_2016,\n\taddress = {Stuttgart},\n\ttitle = {Ecocriticism: eine {Einführung}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-476-02567-8},\n\tshorttitle = {Ecocriticism},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {JBMetzler Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Bühler, Benjamin},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990147473830203941},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Ecofiction, German literature, History and criticism, Literature and science, Literature, Modern, Science fiction, Themes, motives, Theory, etc},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Dürbeck, G.\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecocriticism: eine Einführung.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; and Urte Stobbe.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Böhlau-Studien-Bücher. Grundlagen des StudiumsBöhlau Verlag, Köln, 2015.\n HOLLIS number: 990145421240203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecocriticism_2015,\n\taddress = {Köln},\n\tseries = {Böhlau-{Studien}-{Bücher}. {Grundlagen} des {Studiums}},\n\ttitle = {Ecocriticism: eine {Einführung}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-412-50165-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Ecocriticism},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Böhlau Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990145421240203941},\n\tkeywords = {Critical theory, Ecocriticism, History and criticism, In art, In motion pictures, Literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecological thought in German literature and culture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; Urte Stobbe; Hubert Zapf; and Evi Zemanek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ecocritical theory and practiceLexington Books, Lanham, Maryland, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecological_2017,\n\taddress = {Lanham, Maryland},\n\tseries = {Ecocritical theory and practice},\n\ttitle = {Ecological thought in {German} literature and culture},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4985-1492-7},\n\tabstract = {"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms." -- Book jacket.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Lexington Books},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte and Zapf, Hubert and Zemanek, Evi},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Arts, Ecology in literature, German literature, Germany, History, History and criticism, Intellectual life},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms.\" – Book jacket.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Anthropocene in Contemporary German Ecothrillers.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Caroline Schaumann; and Heather I. Sullivan., editor(s), German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene, pages 315–331. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{schaumann_anthropocene_2017,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\ttitle = {The {Anthropocene} in {Contemporary} {German} {Ecothrillers}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-137-55985-2 978-1-137-54222-9},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_17},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tbooktitle = {German {Ecocriticism} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave Macmillan US},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele},\n\teditor = {Schaumann, Caroline and Sullivan, Heather I.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_17},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism},\n\tpages = {315--331},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Ermisch, M.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: Graduiertenkolleg Interdisziplinäre Umweltgeschichte, Seminar für Deutsche Philologie.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maren Ermisch; Ulrike Kruse; and Urte Stobbe.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{ermisch_okologische_2010,\n\taddress = {Göttingen},\n\ttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: {Graduiertenkolleg} {Interdisziplinäre} {Umweltgeschichte}, {Seminar} für {Deutsche} {Philologie}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-941875-86-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen},\n\tabstract = {Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to "nature" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Universitätsverlag Göttingen},\n\tauthor = {Ermisch, Maren and Kruse, Ulrike and Stobbe, Urte},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Ecology in literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to \"nature\" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Ette, O.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Life of a Nomad and a World Citizen: Alexander von Humboldt, Nomadic Knowledge, and the Global Landscapes of Theory.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ottmar Ette.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 33–53. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ette_life_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {Life} of a {Nomad} and a {World} {Citizen}: {Alexander} von {Humboldt}, {Nomadic} {Knowledge}, and the {Global} {Landscapes} of {Theory}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Life} of a {Nomad} and a {World} {Citizen}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511859},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511859},\n\tabstract = {The nomadic thinking in Alexander von Humboldt's American travel journals makes them relevant in the context of global theories. As a theoretician of globalization between words, scientific fields, and worlds, Humboldt explores the dimensions and movements of knowledge through a translingual écriture that connects epistemological modes between ethics and aesthetics. His multirelational research agenda is inspired by movement that aims at creating “polytopia,” a scholarly field reflected from various stand-points. Humboldt's writing habits on the move as well as at home have created a materiality of writing inscribed in his travel journals. By interpreting nineteenth-century portraits of him, I show the link between the researcher and his journals, which also underlines his craft of turning handwriting into an iconic theme. Humboldt's works and journals imply a landscape of theory based on ongoing movement, discovery, and exploration.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Ette, Ottmar},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {33--53},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The nomadic thinking in Alexander von Humboldt's American travel journals makes them relevant in the context of global theories. As a theoretician of globalization between words, scientific fields, and worlds, Humboldt explores the dimensions and movements of knowledge through a translingual écriture that connects epistemological modes between ethics and aesthetics. His multirelational research agenda is inspired by movement that aims at creating “polytopia,” a scholarly field reflected from various stand-points. Humboldt's writing habits on the move as well as at home have created a materiality of writing inscribed in his travel journals. By interpreting nineteenth-century portraits of him, I show the link between the researcher and his journals, which also underlines his craft of turning handwriting into an iconic theme. Humboldt's works and journals imply a landscape of theory based on ongoing movement, discovery, and exploration.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Feigenbaum, R.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Toward a Nonanthropocentric Vision of Nature: Goethe’s Discovery of the Intermaxillary Bone.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ryan Feigenbaum.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 73–93. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TowardPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{feigenbaum_toward_2015,\n\ttitle = {Toward a {Nonanthropocentric} {Vision} of {Nature}: {Goethe}’s {Discovery} of the {Intermaxillary} {Bone}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {Toward a {Nonanthropocentric} {Vision} of {Nature}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.feigenbaum.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0012},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Feigenbaum, Ryan},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {73--93},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Fischer, L.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Goethe and Environmentalism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luke Fischer; and Dalia Nassar.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe yearbook, 22(1): 3–22. 2015.\n Place: Rochester Publisher: North American Goethe Society\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{fischer_introduction_2015,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Goethe} and {Environmentalism}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {0734-3329},\n\tshorttitle = {Introduction},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0032},\n\tabstract = {[...]ecocriticism also seeks to examine the very concepts that we have inherited-our conceptual apparatus, after all, is not neutral, and the environmental crisis cannot be dissociated from the very ways in which we think and conceptualize the more-than-human world. [...]Goethe explores ways in which living organisms are not only meaningful signs for human beings but also themselves engaged in processes of communication. Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London: Routledge, 2002). [...]in her introduction to the first ecocriticism reader (1996), Cheryll Glotfelty criticizes mainstream literary studies, which, in contrast to philosophy history, and anthropology, have not yet taken account of the environmental crisis. Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: [...]Greg Garrard writes that "environmental problems require analysis in cultural as well as scientific terms, because they are the outcome of an interaction between ecological knowledge of nature and its cultural inflection."},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Goethe yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Fischer, Luke and Nassar, Dalia},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Place: Rochester\nPublisher: North American Goethe Society},\n\tkeywords = {1749-1832, Criticism, Criticism and interpretation, Culture, Ecocriticism, Environmental ethics, Environmental impact, Environmentalism in literature, Epistemology, German literature, Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749-1832), Humanities, Inflection (Morphology), Interpersonal communication, Knowledge, Nature, Ontology, Philosophers, Philosophy, Poets, Postmodernism, Science, Scientific technical language},\n\tpages = {3--22},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n [...]ecocriticism also seeks to examine the very concepts that we have inherited-our conceptual apparatus, after all, is not neutral, and the environmental crisis cannot be dissociated from the very ways in which we think and conceptualize the more-than-human world. [...]Goethe explores ways in which living organisms are not only meaningful signs for human beings but also themselves engaged in processes of communication. Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London: Routledge, 2002). [...]in her introduction to the first ecocriticism reader (1996), Cheryll Glotfelty criticizes mainstream literary studies, which, in contrast to philosophy history, and anthropology, have not yet taken account of the environmental crisis. Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: [...]Greg Garrard writes that \"environmental problems require analysis in cultural as well as scientific terms, because they are the outcome of an interaction between ecological knowledge of nature and its cultural inflection.\"\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Goethe and Environmentalism.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luke Fischer; and Dalia Nassar.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 3–22. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Introduction:Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{fischer_introduction_2015-1,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Goethe} and {Environmentalism}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {Introduction},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.fischer.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0032},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Fischer, Luke and Nassar, Dalia},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {3--22},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Garrard, G.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Heidegger Nazism Ecocriticism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Greg Garrard.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Interdisciplinary studies in literature and environment, 17(2): 251–271. 2010.\n Publisher: Oxford University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{garrard_heidegger_2010,\n\ttitle = {Heidegger {Nazism} {Ecocriticism}},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tissn = {1076-0962},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/isle/isq029},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Interdisciplinary studies in literature and environment},\n\tauthor = {Garrard, Greg},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Oxford University Press},\n\tkeywords = {1900-1999, Concept of being, Deep ecology, Ecocriticism, Ecophilosophy, Environmental conservation, Forestry, German literature, Heidegger, Martin, Literary criticism, Metaphysics, Nazism, Poetry, Scholarly Articles, nature, ontology, prose},\n\tpages = {251--271},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Gersdorf, C.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Natur, Kultur, Text: Beiträge zu Ökologie und Literaturwissenschaft.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Catrin Gersdorf; and Sylvia Mayer.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Beiträge zur neueren LiteraturgeschichteWinter, Heidelberg, 2005.\n HOLLIS number: 990097721280203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{gersdorf_natur_2005,\n\taddress = {Heidelberg},\n\tseries = {Beiträge zur neueren {Literaturgeschichte}},\n\ttitle = {Natur, {Kultur}, {Text}: {Beiträge} zu Ökologie und {Literaturwissenschaft}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-8253-5011-6},\n\tshorttitle = {Natur, {Kultur}, {Text}},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tpublisher = {Winter},\n\tauthor = {Gersdorf, Catrin and Mayer, Sylvia},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990097721280203941},\n\tkeywords = {20th century, Congresses, Ecology, German literature, History and criticism},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Goodbody, A.\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Heimat and the Place of Humans in the World: Jenny Erpenbeck's Heimsuchung in Ecocritical Perspective.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Axel Goodbody.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 127–151. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"HeimatPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{goodbody_heimat_2016,\n\ttitle = {Heimat and the {Place} of {Humans} in the {World}: {Jenny} {Erpenbeck}'s {Heimsuchung} in {Ecocritical} {Perspective}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {Heimat and the {Place} of {Humans} in the {World}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511907},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511907},\n\tabstract = {This article considers the human-nature relationship in modern Heimat (homeland) discourse and its depiction in literary representations of Heimat. The first part examines the environmental turn in thinking on Heimat in the 1970s and shows how it was part of a wider shift in the understanding of Heimat, which has paralleled developments in both spatial and ecocritical theory. It proposes that literary representations of the homeland can facilitate an alternative form of dwelling involving a new kind of attachment to place and a nondualist relationship with nature. The second part analyzes Jenny Erpenbeck's novel Heimsuchung (Visitation, 2008) through Gernot Böhme's ecological nature aesthetics and the material ecocriticism of Jane Bennett and of Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann. Their respective “new humanist” and “posthumanist” theoretical frameworks offer insights into Erpenbeck's account of efforts to make the place described a home and of its function as homeland.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Goodbody, Axel},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {127--151},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article considers the human-nature relationship in modern Heimat (homeland) discourse and its depiction in literary representations of Heimat. The first part examines the environmental turn in thinking on Heimat in the 1970s and shows how it was part of a wider shift in the understanding of Heimat, which has paralleled developments in both spatial and ecocritical theory. It proposes that literary representations of the homeland can facilitate an alternative form of dwelling involving a new kind of attachment to place and a nondualist relationship with nature. The second part analyzes Jenny Erpenbeck's novel Heimsuchung (Visitation, 2008) through Gernot Böhme's ecological nature aesthetics and the material ecocriticism of Jane Bennett and of Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann. Their respective “new humanist” and “posthumanist” theoretical frameworks offer insights into Erpenbeck's account of efforts to make the place described a home and of its function as homeland.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Melting Ice and the Paradoxes of Zeno: Didactic Impulses and Aesthetic Distanciation in German Climate Change Fiction // Impulsos didácticos y distancia estética en la ficción alemana sobre el cambio climático.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Axel Howarth Goodbody.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ecozon@, 4(1): 92–102. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{goodbody_melting_2013,\n\ttitle = {Melting {Ice} and the {Paradoxes} of {Zeno}: {Didactic} {Impulses} and {Aesthetic} {Distanciation} in {German} {Climate} {Change} {Fiction} // {Impulsos} didácticos y distancia estética en la ficción alemana sobre el cambio climático},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tissn = {2171-9594},\n\tdoi = {10.37536/ECOZONA.2013.4.1.502},\n\tabstract = {Although global warming has been a topic of American and British popular fiction since the 1980s, its literary representation has only recently become an object of academic enquiry. Perhaps a score of German novels on the subject have also appeared, and critical analysis of these is now called for. Following a general outline of the socio-political, philosophical, and ethical issues which climate change raises, and of the particular aesthetic challenges which writing about global warming poses, Ilija Trojanow’s EisTau (Melting Ice, 2011) serves as a basis for discussion of the tensions between confessional and didactic impulses on the one hand, and recognition of the need for an aesthetic facilitating detachment on the other.  Resumen               Aunque el calentamiento global ha aparecido en la literatura popular americana y británica desde los años 80, su representación literaria no se ha converitdo en objeto de investigación académica hasta recientemente. Quizá una veintena de novelas alemanas sobre el tema también han aparecido, requiriendo así un análisis critico. Siguiendo un resumen general de los asuntos socio-políticos, filosóficos y éticos que el cambio climático ha planteado, y de los desafíos estéticos particulares que surgen al escribir sobre el calentamiento global, la novela EisTau (Melting Ice, 2011) de Ilija Trojanow sirve como base para debatir las tensiones entre los impulsos confesionales y didácticos, por un lado, y sobre el reconocimiento de la necesidad de una estética que facilite el desapego, por otro.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Ecozon@},\n\tauthor = {Goodbody, Axel Howarth},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {92--102},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Although global warming has been a topic of American and British popular fiction since the 1980s, its literary representation has only recently become an object of academic enquiry. Perhaps a score of German novels on the subject have also appeared, and critical analysis of these is now called for. Following a general outline of the socio-political, philosophical, and ethical issues which climate change raises, and of the particular aesthetic challenges which writing about global warming poses, Ilija Trojanow’s EisTau (Melting Ice, 2011) serves as a basis for discussion of the tensions between confessional and didactic impulses on the one hand, and recognition of the need for an aesthetic facilitating detachment on the other.  Resumen               Aunque el calentamiento global ha aparecido en la literatura popular americana y británica desde los años 80, su representación literaria no se ha converitdo en objeto de investigación académica hasta recientemente. Quizá una veintena de novelas alemanas sobre el tema también han aparecido, requiriendo así un análisis critico. Siguiendo un resumen general de los asuntos socio-políticos, filosóficos y éticos que el cambio climático ha planteado, y de los desafíos estéticos particulares que surgen al escribir sobre el calentamiento global, la novela EisTau (Melting Ice, 2011) de Ilija Trojanow sirve como base para debatir las tensiones entre los impulsos confesionales y didácticos, por un lado, y sobre el reconocimiento de la necesidad de una estética que facilite el desapego, por otro.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Telling the Story of Climate Change: The German Novel in the Anthropocene.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Axel Goodbody.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Caroline Schaumann; and Heather I. Sullivan., editor(s), German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene, pages 293–314. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TellingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{schaumann_telling_2017,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\ttitle = {Telling the {Story} of {Climate} {Change}: {The} {German} {Novel} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-137-55985-2 978-1-137-54222-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Telling the {Story} of {Climate} {Change}},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_16},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tbooktitle = {German {Ecocriticism} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave Macmillan US},\n\tauthor = {Goodbody, Axel},\n\teditor = {Schaumann, Caroline and Sullivan, Heather I.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_16},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism},\n\tpages = {293--314},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Groves, J.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Goethe’s Petrofiction: Reading the Wanderjahre in the Anthropocene.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jason Groves.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 95–113. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Goethe’sPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{groves_goethes_2015,\n\ttitle = {Goethe’s {Petrofiction}: {Reading} the {Wanderjahre} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {Goethe’s {Petrofiction}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.groves.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0018},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Groves, Jason},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {95--113},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Heise, U.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Environmental Humanities and the Futures of the Human.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ursula K. Heise.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 21–31. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{heise_environmental_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {Environmental} {Humanities} and the {Futures} of the {Human}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511847},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511847},\n\tabstract = {The environmental humanities have emerged over the last decade as a new interdisciplinary matrix that connects environmentally oriented research in the humanities and qualitative social sciences. This new area of research defines ecological issues as social and cultural rather than scientific and technological. In the process, controversies have emerged around the concept of the Anthropocene, whose emphasis on the planetary agency of the human species conflicts with Marxist analyses of socioeconomic inequality and with posthumanist approaches that question the exceptionality of the human subject. The project of the environmental humanities emerges from the critique of dominant natural science concepts combined with the creative effort to shape new stories beyond environmental decline narratives, including speculative and utopian stories, that can engage a wider public in shaping the future.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Heise, Ursula K.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {21--31},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The environmental humanities have emerged over the last decade as a new interdisciplinary matrix that connects environmentally oriented research in the humanities and qualitative social sciences. This new area of research defines ecological issues as social and cultural rather than scientific and technological. In the process, controversies have emerged around the concept of the Anthropocene, whose emphasis on the planetary agency of the human species conflicts with Marxist analyses of socioeconomic inequality and with posthumanist approaches that question the exceptionality of the human subject. The project of the environmental humanities emerges from the critique of dominant natural science concepts combined with the creative effort to shape new stories beyond environmental decline narratives, including speculative and utopian stories, that can engage a wider public in shaping the future.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Sense of Place and Sense of Planet.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ursula Heise.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Oxford University Press, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{heise_sense_2008,\n\ttitle = {Sense of {Place} and {Sense} of {Planet}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-19-533564-4},\n\tpublisher = {Oxford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Heise, Ursula},\n\tyear = {2008},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Hermand, J.\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Brennpunkt Ökologie. Kulturelle und gesellschaftspolitische Interventionen.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jost Hermand.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{hermand_brennpunkt_2020,\n\ttitle = {Brennpunkt Ökologie. {Kulturelle} und gesellschaftspolitische {Interventionen}.},\n\tauthor = {Hermand, Jost},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grüne Klassik. Goethes Naturverständnis in Kunst und Wissenschaft.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jost Hermand.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{hermand_grune_2016,\n\ttitle = {Grüne {Klassik}. {Goethes} {Naturverständnis} in {Kunst} und {Wissenschaft}},\n\tauthor = {Hermand, Jost},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grüne Utopien in Deutschland: zur Geschichte des ökologischen Bewusstseins.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jost Hermand.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Geschichte FischerFischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Originalaus. edition, 1991.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{hermand_grune_1991,\n\taddress = {Frankfurt am Main},\n\tedition = {Originalaus.},\n\tseries = {Geschichte {Fischer}},\n\ttitle = {Grüne {Utopien} in {Deutschland}: zur {Geschichte} des ökologischen {Bewusstseins}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-596-10395-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Grüne {Utopien} in {Deutschland}},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Hermand, Jost},\n\tyear = {1991},\n\tkeywords = {Citizen participation, Environmental policy, Germany, History},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Hofer, S.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Die Ökologie der Literatur.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Stefan Hofer.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Lettretranscript Verlag, Bielefeld, 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DiePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{hofer_okologie_2007,\n\taddress = {Bielefeld},\n\tseries = {Lettre},\n\ttitle = {Die Ökologie der {Literatur}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-89942-753-0},\n\turl = {https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22642},\n\tabstract = {Dieses Buch unternimmt den innovativen Versuch, das Paradigma einer ökologisch orientierten Literaturwissenschaft mit Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie auf eine tragfähige theoretische Grundlage zu stellen. Zugleich wird unter den Auspizien der beiden Diskurse der Vorschlag gemacht, den Code des Kunstsystems neu zu fassen. Die Studie leistet damit mehreres: eine umfassende Einführung in das im deutschsprachigen Raum (noch) wenig bekannte Paradigma der ökologischen Literaturwissenschaft bzw. des »Ecocriticism«, eine perspektivenreiche Kombination von Systemtheorie und Literaturwissenschaft sowie eine Erprobung des theoretisch Erarbeiteten an ausgewählten Texten Peter Handkes.},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {transcript Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Hofer, Stefan},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tdoi = {10.14361/9783839407530},\n\tkeywords = {Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft, Ecocriticism, General Literature Studies, German Literature, Germanistik, Literary Studies, Literatur, Literature, Literaturtheorie, Literaturwissenschaft, Natur, Nature, Peter Handke, Systems Theory, Systemtheorie, Theory of Literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Dieses Buch unternimmt den innovativen Versuch, das Paradigma einer ökologisch orientierten Literaturwissenschaft mit Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie auf eine tragfähige theoretische Grundlage zu stellen. Zugleich wird unter den Auspizien der beiden Diskurse der Vorschlag gemacht, den Code des Kunstsystems neu zu fassen. Die Studie leistet damit mehreres: eine umfassende Einführung in das im deutschsprachigen Raum (noch) wenig bekannte Paradigma der ökologischen Literaturwissenschaft bzw. des »Ecocriticism«, eine perspektivenreiche Kombination von Systemtheorie und Literaturwissenschaft sowie eine Erprobung des theoretisch Erarbeiteten an ausgewählten Texten Peter Handkes.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Ireton, S.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Dialektik der Erschließung: The German–Austrian Alps between Exploration and Exploitation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sean Ireton.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 17. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DialektikPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ireton_dialektik_2021,\n\ttitle = {Dialektik der {Erschließung}: {The} {German}–{Austrian} {Alps} between {Exploration} and {Exploitation}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Dialektik der {Erschließung}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/17},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010017},\n\tabstract = {Focusing on the so-called N\\&ouml;rdliche Kalkalpen or Northern Limestone Alps of Germany and Austria, I will discuss how human interaction with these mountains during the age of the Anthropocene shifts from scientific and athletic exploration to commercial and industrial exploitation. More specifically, I will examine travel narratives by the nineteenth-century mountaineers Friedrich Simony and Hermann von Barth, juxtaposing their respective experiences in diverse Alpine subranges with the environmental history of those regions. This juxtaposition harbors a deeper paradox, one that can be formulated as follows: Whereas Simony and Barth both rank as historically important Erschlie\\&szlig;er of the German and Austrian Alps, having explored their crags and glaciers in search of somatic adventure and geoscientific knowledge, these very sites of rock and ice were about to become so erschlossen by modernized tourism that one wonders where the precise boundaries between individual-based discovery and technology-driven development lie. In other words, during the nineteenth century a kind of Dialektik der Erschlie\\&szlig;ung (a variation on Horkheimer and Adorno\\&rsquo;s Dialektik der Aufkl\\&auml;rung) manifests itself in the increasing anthropogenic alteration of the Alps.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Ireton, Sean},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {Alps, Anthropocene, Friedrich Simony, Hermann von Barth},\n\tpages = {17},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Focusing on the so-called Nördliche Kalkalpen or Northern Limestone Alps of Germany and Austria, I will discuss how human interaction with these mountains during the age of the Anthropocene shifts from scientific and athletic exploration to commercial and industrial exploitation. More specifically, I will examine travel narratives by the nineteenth-century mountaineers Friedrich Simony and Hermann von Barth, juxtaposing their respective experiences in diverse Alpine subranges with the environmental history of those regions. This juxtaposition harbors a deeper paradox, one that can be formulated as follows: Whereas Simony and Barth both rank as historically important Erschließer of the German and Austrian Alps, having explored their crags and glaciers in search of somatic adventure and geoscientific knowledge, these very sites of rock and ice were about to become so erschlossen by modernized tourism that one wonders where the precise boundaries between individual-based discovery and technology-driven development lie. In other words, during the nineteenth century a kind of Dialektik der Erschließung (a variation on Horkheimer and Adorno’s Dialektik der Aufklärung) manifests itself in the increasing anthropogenic alteration of the Alps.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Kost, K.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Narrating a Valley in Max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän: Material Agency, Rain, and the Geologic Past.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kiley M. Kost.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 43. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NarratingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kost_narrating_2021,\n\ttitle = {Narrating a {Valley} in {Max} {Frisch}’s {Der} {Mensch} erscheint im {Holozän}: {Material} {Agency}, {Rain}, and the {Geologic} {Past}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Narrating a {Valley} in {Max} {Frisch}’s {Der} {Mensch} erscheint im {Holozän}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/43},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010043},\n\tabstract = {The complex narrative composition of image and text in Max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän discloses entanglements between humans and nonhuman entities that impact the narrative and that demand careful consideration. The story depicts the aging protagonist’s struggle with memory loss and his careful examination of the valley’s mountain formations in fear of a landslide. In this analysis, I show that both of these threats can be read as entangled with nonhuman agents. By focusing on the material dimension of the text, two central and related shifts occur: the background element of rain becomes foregrounded in the narrative, and the natural formations of the valley that are assumed to be static are revealed to be dynamic. These shifts lead to an interpretation of Frisch’s text focused on the impacts of rain and the temporal scale of the text’s geologic dimension. Approaching the text through the lens of material ecocriticism unveils the multiple agencies at play, decenters the human, and illustrates the embodied experience of climate change.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Kost, Kiley M.},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {\\textit{Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän}, Max Frisch, geology, material ecocriticism, rain, scale},\n\tpages = {43},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The complex narrative composition of image and text in Max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän discloses entanglements between humans and nonhuman entities that impact the narrative and that demand careful consideration. The story depicts the aging protagonist’s struggle with memory loss and his careful examination of the valley’s mountain formations in fear of a landslide. In this analysis, I show that both of these threats can be read as entangled with nonhuman agents. By focusing on the material dimension of the text, two central and related shifts occur: the background element of rain becomes foregrounded in the narrative, and the natural formations of the valley that are assumed to be static are revealed to be dynamic. These shifts lead to an interpretation of Frisch’s text focused on the impacts of rain and the temporal scale of the text’s geologic dimension. Approaching the text through the lens of material ecocriticism unveils the multiple agencies at play, decenters the human, and illustrates the embodied experience of climate change.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Kruse, U.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: Graduiertenkolleg Interdisziplinäre Umweltgeschichte, Seminar für Deutsche Philologie.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maren Ermisch; Ulrike Kruse; and Urte Stobbe.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{ermisch_okologische_2010,\n\taddress = {Göttingen},\n\ttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: {Graduiertenkolleg} {Interdisziplinäre} {Umweltgeschichte}, {Seminar} für {Deutsche} {Philologie}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-941875-86-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen},\n\tabstract = {Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to "nature" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Universitätsverlag Göttingen},\n\tauthor = {Ermisch, Maren and Kruse, Ulrike and Stobbe, Urte},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Ecology in literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to \"nature\" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Lekan, T.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Natural History of Modernity: Bernhard Grzimek and the Globalization of Environmental Kulturkritik.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Thomas Lekan.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 55–82. August 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{lekan_natural_2016,\n\ttitle = {A {Natural} {History} of {Modernity}: {Bernhard} {Grzimek} and the {Globalization} of {Environmental} {Kulturkritik}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {A {Natural} {History} of {Modernity}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511871},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511871},\n\tabstract = {This article explores the doomsday vision of humans and other animals found in the nonfiction books, documentary films, and autobiography of former Frankfurt Zoological Garden director and television star Bernhard Grzimek. Focusing on his career transition in the 1940s and 1950s from veterinarian to zoological director to global conservation activist, the article shows that the Malthusian fears that underpinned Grzimek's plea for national parks in sub-Saharan Africa that segregated people and wildlife had their origins in an environmental Kulturkritik born of post-Nazi and Cold War ruminations about human aggression and environmental destruction. Grzimek portrayed both the zoo and the national park as compensation for a “great extinction” that linked the industrialized slaughterhouse in Europe to trophy hunting in Africa. This natural history of modernity envisioned a global nature commons beyond the ideologies of Christian humanism and social democracy, yet it enfolded Africans into a European narrative of development that left no room for cultural landscapes created by customary tenure and vernacular ecologies.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Lekan, Thomas},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {55--82},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article explores the doomsday vision of humans and other animals found in the nonfiction books, documentary films, and autobiography of former Frankfurt Zoological Garden director and television star Bernhard Grzimek. Focusing on his career transition in the 1940s and 1950s from veterinarian to zoological director to global conservation activist, the article shows that the Malthusian fears that underpinned Grzimek's plea for national parks in sub-Saharan Africa that segregated people and wildlife had their origins in an environmental Kulturkritik born of post-Nazi and Cold War ruminations about human aggression and environmental destruction. Grzimek portrayed both the zoo and the national park as compensation for a “great extinction” that linked the industrialized slaughterhouse in Europe to trophy hunting in Africa. This natural history of modernity envisioned a global nature commons beyond the ideologies of Christian humanism and social democracy, yet it enfolded Africans into a European narrative of development that left no room for cultural landscapes created by customary tenure and vernacular ecologies.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Malkmus, B.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Challenge of Ecology to the Humanities: An Introduction.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather I. Sullivan; and Bernhard F. Malkmus.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German critique, 43(2): 1–20. 2016.\n Publisher: Duke University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sullivan_challenge_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {Challenge} of {Ecology} to the {Humanities}: {An} {Introduction}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Challenge} of {Ecology} to the {Humanities}},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511835},\n\tabstract = {The introduction to\nsketches out the ambiguous response of the humanities to the long-term anthropological thinking about the human as an ecological being from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and the more recent constructivist worldviews typically discrediting biological thinking about humans as intrinsically “essentialist” and “nature” as cultural fabrication. The global ecological crisis, however, and an increasing awareness of the impact of human activity on the planet's ecosystems have forced the humanities to reassess such anthropological and biological assumptions. Recent strategies of the environmental humanities include either reformulating classic humanism with ecological frames or seeking alternative, “posthumanist” perspectives that avoid its inherent anthropocentrism. The special issue puts voices from historical, philosophical, and literary disciplines in dialogue with each other, with the goal of mapping out various possibilities for both the humanities and the environmental humanities.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {New German critique},\n\tauthor = {Sullivan, Heather I. and Malkmus, Bernhard F.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Duke University Press},\n\tkeywords = {Environmental Studies, European Studies, Theory and Philosophy},\n\tpages = {1--20},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The introduction to sketches out the ambiguous response of the humanities to the long-term anthropological thinking about the human as an ecological being from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and the more recent constructivist worldviews typically discrediting biological thinking about humans as intrinsically “essentialist” and “nature” as cultural fabrication. The global ecological crisis, however, and an increasing awareness of the impact of human activity on the planet's ecosystems have forced the humanities to reassess such anthropological and biological assumptions. Recent strategies of the environmental humanities include either reformulating classic humanism with ecological frames or seeking alternative, “posthumanist” perspectives that avoid its inherent anthropocentrism. The special issue puts voices from historical, philosophical, and literary disciplines in dialogue with each other, with the goal of mapping out various possibilities for both the humanities and the environmental humanities.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Mayer, S.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Natur, Kultur, Text: Beiträge zu Ökologie und Literaturwissenschaft.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Catrin Gersdorf; and Sylvia Mayer.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Beiträge zur neueren LiteraturgeschichteWinter, Heidelberg, 2005.\n HOLLIS number: 990097721280203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{gersdorf_natur_2005,\n\taddress = {Heidelberg},\n\tseries = {Beiträge zur neueren {Literaturgeschichte}},\n\ttitle = {Natur, {Kultur}, {Text}: {Beiträge} zu Ökologie und {Literaturwissenschaft}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-8253-5011-6},\n\tshorttitle = {Natur, {Kultur}, {Text}},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tpublisher = {Winter},\n\tauthor = {Gersdorf, Catrin and Mayer, Sylvia},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990097721280203941},\n\tkeywords = {20th century, Congresses, Ecology, German literature, History and criticism},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Mergenthaler, M.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Fridays for Future zwischen Ökologie und Gerechtigkeit. Eine Instagram-Fallstudie.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kassi Burnett; and May Mergenthaler.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ökologie. Special issue of Non Fiktion: Arsenal der anderen Gattungen, 16(1): 231–362. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FridaysPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{burnett_fridays_2021,\n\ttitle = {Fridays for {Future} zwischen Ökologie und {Gerechtigkeit}. {Eine} {Instagram}-{Fallstudie}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\turl = {https://www.wehrhahn-verlag.de/public/index.php?ID_Section=1&ID_Category=17&ID_Product=1432},\n\tabstract = {In their paper, Mergenthaler first analyzes the innovative and unique character of Fridays for Future as an environmental youth movement, in comparison with precursors like the anti-nuclear movement. On this basis, the authors explore how FFF presents its two main issues—the fight against climate change and for climate justice—on its Instagram account, focusing on the especially active account of Fridays for Future Germany. They find that the social medium of Instagram presents many opportunities to combine these issues, e.g., by presenting stories by activists from all around the world, including regions already strongly impacted by global warming. However, Mergenthaler and Burnett also note that the tension between environmentalism and social justice remains unresolved. FFF’s main cause is the protection of nature and the survival of humanity based on the insights of climate science, but the movement leaves open for debate the more clearly political question of how to make that survival fair.},\n\tlanguage = {German},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Ökologie. Special issue of Non Fiktion: Arsenal der anderen Gattungen},\n\tauthor = {Burnett, Kassi and Mergenthaler, May},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {231--362},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In their paper, Mergenthaler first analyzes the innovative and unique character of Fridays for Future as an environmental youth movement, in comparison with precursors like the anti-nuclear movement. On this basis, the authors explore how FFF presents its two main issues—the fight against climate change and for climate justice—on its Instagram account, focusing on the especially active account of Fridays for Future Germany. They find that the social medium of Instagram presents many opportunities to combine these issues, e.g., by presenting stories by activists from all around the world, including regions already strongly impacted by global warming. However, Mergenthaler and Burnett also note that the tension between environmentalism and social justice remains unresolved. FFF’s main cause is the protection of nature and the survival of humanity based on the insights of climate science, but the movement leaves open for debate the more clearly political question of how to make that survival fair.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Nassar, D.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Goethe and Environmentalism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luke Fischer; and Dalia Nassar.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe yearbook, 22(1): 3–22. 2015.\n Place: Rochester Publisher: North American Goethe Society\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{fischer_introduction_2015,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Goethe} and {Environmentalism}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {0734-3329},\n\tshorttitle = {Introduction},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0032},\n\tabstract = {[...]ecocriticism also seeks to examine the very concepts that we have inherited-our conceptual apparatus, after all, is not neutral, and the environmental crisis cannot be dissociated from the very ways in which we think and conceptualize the more-than-human world. [...]Goethe explores ways in which living organisms are not only meaningful signs for human beings but also themselves engaged in processes of communication. Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London: Routledge, 2002). [...]in her introduction to the first ecocriticism reader (1996), Cheryll Glotfelty criticizes mainstream literary studies, which, in contrast to philosophy history, and anthropology, have not yet taken account of the environmental crisis. Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: [...]Greg Garrard writes that "environmental problems require analysis in cultural as well as scientific terms, because they are the outcome of an interaction between ecological knowledge of nature and its cultural inflection."},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Goethe yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Fischer, Luke and Nassar, Dalia},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Place: Rochester\nPublisher: North American Goethe Society},\n\tkeywords = {1749-1832, Criticism, Criticism and interpretation, Culture, Ecocriticism, Environmental ethics, Environmental impact, Environmentalism in literature, Epistemology, German literature, Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749-1832), Humanities, Inflection (Morphology), Interpersonal communication, Knowledge, Nature, Ontology, Philosophers, Philosophy, Poets, Postmodernism, Science, Scientific technical language},\n\tpages = {3--22},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n [...]ecocriticism also seeks to examine the very concepts that we have inherited-our conceptual apparatus, after all, is not neutral, and the environmental crisis cannot be dissociated from the very ways in which we think and conceptualize the more-than-human world. [...]Goethe explores ways in which living organisms are not only meaningful signs for human beings but also themselves engaged in processes of communication. Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London: Routledge, 2002). [...]in her introduction to the first ecocriticism reader (1996), Cheryll Glotfelty criticizes mainstream literary studies, which, in contrast to philosophy history, and anthropology, have not yet taken account of the environmental crisis. Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: [...]Greg Garrard writes that \"environmental problems require analysis in cultural as well as scientific terms, because they are the outcome of an interaction between ecological knowledge of nature and its cultural inflection.\"\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Goethe and Environmentalism.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luke Fischer; and Dalia Nassar.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 3–22. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Introduction:Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{fischer_introduction_2015-1,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Goethe} and {Environmentalism}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {Introduction},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.fischer.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0032},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Fischer, Luke and Nassar, Dalia},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {3--22},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Ott, K.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n On the Meaning of Eudemonic Arguments for a Deep Anthropocentric Environmental Ethics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Konrad Ott.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 105–126. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OnPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ott_meaning_2016,\n\ttitle = {On the {Meaning} of {Eudemonic} {Arguments} for a {Deep} {Anthropocentric} {Environmental} {Ethics}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511895},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511895},\n\tabstract = {There are three broad categories of values in environmental ethics: instrumental, inherent moral, and eudemonistic. While instrumental values refer to ways humans are reliant on nature, inherent moral values give natural beings direct moral standing. Eudemonic values can pave the way to a “deep” anthropo-related approach. The article substantiates this claim in six steps. First, it criticizes the dichotomy between instrumental and inherent values. Second, eudemonic values are grounded in the phenomenological concept of experience. It is argued that experiences must be articulated through language. Third, eudemonic values are traced back to Goethean and Romantic traditions. Fourth, the scope of eudemonic values is opened. Fifth, the paradigm example of experiencing natural beauty is presented. Sixth, the gap between phenomenology, eudemonic values, and morals is addressed. In respect to morals, eudemonic values refer to Immanuel Kant's notion of “humanity within personhood.”},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Ott, Konrad},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {105--126},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n There are three broad categories of values in environmental ethics: instrumental, inherent moral, and eudemonistic. While instrumental values refer to ways humans are reliant on nature, inherent moral values give natural beings direct moral standing. Eudemonic values can pave the way to a “deep” anthropo-related approach. The article substantiates this claim in six steps. First, it criticizes the dichotomy between instrumental and inherent values. Second, eudemonic values are grounded in the phenomenological concept of experience. It is argued that experiences must be articulated through language. Third, eudemonic values are traced back to Goethean and Romantic traditions. Fourth, the scope of eudemonic values is opened. Fifth, the paradigm example of experiencing natural beauty is presented. Sixth, the gap between phenomenology, eudemonic values, and morals is addressed. In respect to morals, eudemonic values refer to Immanuel Kant's notion of “humanity within personhood.”\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Peabody, S.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Image, Environment, Infrastructure: The Social Ecologies of the Bergfilm.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Seth Peabody.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 38. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Image,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{peabody_image_2021,\n\ttitle = {Image, {Environment}, {Infrastructure}: {The} {Social} {Ecologies} of the {Bergfilm}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Image, {Environment}, {Infrastructure}},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/38},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010038},\n\tabstract = {The German mountain film (Bergfilm) has received extensive critical attention for its political, social, and aesthetic implications, but has received remarkably little attention for its role in the environmental history of the Alps. This article considers the Bergfilm within the long history of depictions of the Alps and the growth of Alpine tourism in order to ask how the role of media in environmental change shifts with the advent of film. The argument builds on Verena Winiwarter and Martin Knoll’s model of social-ecological interaction, Adrian Ivakhiv’s theoretical framework for the environmental implications of film, and Laura Frahm’s theories of filmic space. Through an analysis of Arnold Fanck’s films Der heilige Berg [The Holy Mountain, Fanck 1926] and Der große Sprung [The Great Leap, Fanck 1927], which are compared with Gustav Renker’s novel Heilige Berge [Holy Mountains, Renker 1921] and set into the context of the environmental history of the Alpine regions where the films were shot, the author argues that film aesthetics serve as a creative catalyst for environmental change and infrastructure development. While some ecocinema scholars have argued that environmental films teach viewers new ideas or change modes of behavior, this analysis suggests that film aesthetics are most effective at accelerating processes of environmental change that are already underway.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Peabody, Seth},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {\\textit{Bergfilm}, Alpine history, German film, Weimar film, ecocinema, ecocriticism, environmental history, film history, film theory, skiing},\n\tpages = {38},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The German mountain film (Bergfilm) has received extensive critical attention for its political, social, and aesthetic implications, but has received remarkably little attention for its role in the environmental history of the Alps. This article considers the Bergfilm within the long history of depictions of the Alps and the growth of Alpine tourism in order to ask how the role of media in environmental change shifts with the advent of film. The argument builds on Verena Winiwarter and Martin Knoll’s model of social-ecological interaction, Adrian Ivakhiv’s theoretical framework for the environmental implications of film, and Laura Frahm’s theories of filmic space. Through an analysis of Arnold Fanck’s films Der heilige Berg [The Holy Mountain, Fanck 1926] and Der große Sprung [The Great Leap, Fanck 1927], which are compared with Gustav Renker’s novel Heilige Berge [Holy Mountains, Renker 1921] and set into the context of the environmental history of the Alpine regions where the films were shot, the author argues that film aesthetics serve as a creative catalyst for environmental change and infrastructure development. While some ecocinema scholars have argued that environmental films teach viewers new ideas or change modes of behavior, this analysis suggests that film aesthetics are most effective at accelerating processes of environmental change that are already underway.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Goethe and (Um)Weltliteratur: Environment and Power in Goethe’s Literary Worlds.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Seth Peabody.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies, 54(2): 215–230. 2018.\n Publisher: University of Toronto Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GoethePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{peabody_goethe_2018,\n\ttitle = {Goethe and ({Um}){Weltliteratur}: {Environment} and {Power} in {Goethe}’s {Literary} {Worlds}},\n\tvolume = {54},\n\tissn = {1911-026X},\n\tshorttitle = {Goethe and ({Um}){Weltliteratur}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/article/696446},\n\tabstract = {Goethe occupies a prominent but conflicted position within recent discussions of global inequalities embedded into the notion of “world literature.” Scholars have also debated Goethe’s environmental thought. Some critics describe him as a progressive environmental thinker, while others paint him as a staunch conservative resistant to changing views of nature. The present study claims that merging these two fields yields a better understanding of both political power and environmental change in Goethe’s writings. Drawing on theories of world literature, postcolonial studies, and environmental humanities, the present essay argues that Goethe’s texts display ambivalence with regards to both political power and environmental change. The argument is developed, in dialogue with past environmental interpretations of Goethe’s work, through an analysis of Die Wahlverwandtschaften. The essay proposes that Die Wahlverwandtschaften can serve as a key text for understanding the tensions in Goethe’s relations to environment, world literature, and political power.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies},\n\tauthor = {Peabody, Seth},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {Publisher: University of Toronto Press},\n\tkeywords = {Goethe, Wahlverwandtschaften/Elective Affinities, ecocriticism, environmental humanities, postcolonial studies, world literature},\n\tpages = {215--230},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Goethe occupies a prominent but conflicted position within recent discussions of global inequalities embedded into the notion of “world literature.” Scholars have also debated Goethe’s environmental thought. Some critics describe him as a progressive environmental thinker, while others paint him as a staunch conservative resistant to changing views of nature. The present study claims that merging these two fields yields a better understanding of both political power and environmental change in Goethe’s writings. Drawing on theories of world literature, postcolonial studies, and environmental humanities, the present essay argues that Goethe’s texts display ambivalence with regards to both political power and environmental change. The argument is developed, in dialogue with past environmental interpretations of Goethe’s work, through an analysis of Die Wahlverwandtschaften. The essay proposes that Die Wahlverwandtschaften can serve as a key text for understanding the tensions in Goethe’s relations to environment, world literature, and political power.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Rigby, C.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dancing with disaster: environmental histories, narratives, and ethics for perilous times.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Catherine E. Rigby.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Under the sign of nature: explorations in ecocriticismUniversity of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{rigby_dancing_2015,\n\taddress = {Charlottesville},\n\tseries = {Under the sign of nature: explorations in ecocriticism},\n\ttitle = {Dancing with disaster: environmental histories, narratives, and ethics for perilous times},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8139-3688-8},\n\tshorttitle = {Dancing with disaster},\n\tabstract = {"The calamitous impacts of climate change that are beginning to be felt around the world today expose the inextricability of human and natural histories. Arguing for a more complex account of such calamities, Kate Rigby examines a variety of past disasters, from the Black Death of the Middle Ages to the mega-hurricanes of the twenty-first century, revealing the dynamic interaction of diverse human and nonhuman factors in their causation, unfolding, and aftermath. Focusing on the link between the ways disasters are framed by the stories told about them and how people tend to respond to them in practice, Rigby also shows how works of narrative fiction invite ethical reflection on human relations with one another, with our often unruly earthly environs, and with other species in the face of eco-catastrophe. In its investigation of an array of authors from the Romantic period to the present--including Heinrich von Kleist, Mary Shelley, Theodor Storm, Colin Thiele, and Alexis Wright--Dancing with Disaster demonstrates the importance of the environmental humanities in the development of more creative, compassionate, ecologically oriented, and socially just responses to the perils and possibilities of the Anthropocene."--Publisher's description.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {University of Virginia Press},\n\tauthor = {Rigby, Catherine E.},\n\tcollaborator = {{JSTOR}},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Ecology in literature, Environmental literature, Natural disasters, Nature in literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"The calamitous impacts of climate change that are beginning to be felt around the world today expose the inextricability of human and natural histories. Arguing for a more complex account of such calamities, Kate Rigby examines a variety of past disasters, from the Black Death of the Middle Ages to the mega-hurricanes of the twenty-first century, revealing the dynamic interaction of diverse human and nonhuman factors in their causation, unfolding, and aftermath. Focusing on the link between the ways disasters are framed by the stories told about them and how people tend to respond to them in practice, Rigby also shows how works of narrative fiction invite ethical reflection on human relations with one another, with our often unruly earthly environs, and with other species in the face of eco-catastrophe. In its investigation of an array of authors from the Romantic period to the present–including Heinrich von Kleist, Mary Shelley, Theodor Storm, Colin Thiele, and Alexis Wright–Dancing with Disaster demonstrates the importance of the environmental humanities in the development of more creative, compassionate, ecologically oriented, and socially just responses to the perils and possibilities of the Anthropocene.\"–Publisher's description.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topographies of the sacred: the poetics of place in European Romanticism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Catherine E. Rigby.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Under the sign of natureUniversity of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{rigby_topographies_2004,\n\taddress = {Charlottesville},\n\tseries = {Under the sign of nature},\n\ttitle = {Topographies of the sacred: the poetics of place in {European} {Romanticism}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8139-2274-4},\n\tshorttitle = {Topographies of the sacred},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {University of Virginia Press},\n\tauthor = {Rigby, Catherine E.},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tkeywords = {18th century, 19th century, German literature, Germany, History and criticism, Nature in literature, Philosophy of nature in literature, Romanticism},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Rigby, K.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Of Mice and Men and Aquatic Flows: Distributed Agency in Theodor Storm's Der Schimmelreiter.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kate Rigby.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 153–176. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OfPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rigby_mice_2016,\n\ttitle = {Of {Mice} and {Men} and {Aquatic} {Flows}: {Distributed} {Agency} in {Theodor} {Storm}'s {Der} {Schimmelreiter}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {Of {Mice} and {Men} and {Aquatic} {Flows}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511919},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511919},\n\tabstract = {Theodor Storm's novella Der Schimmelreiter is set in northwestern Germany, a region with a long history of dyke building and coastal flooding. Drawing on insights into material agency, complexity, and the entwinement of materiality and discourse that have emerged from science studies, I read this text as an exploration of distributed agency that challenges humanist assumptions about both “man” and “nature” by disclosing the limits of rational human mastery in the face of unruly natural phenomena, both “inner” and “outer.” At the same time, the multiple narrative frames of this tragic tale foreground the ineluctable force of viewpoint in any narrative performance of ecocatastrophe. As such, it exemplifies how narrative fiction can provide an imaginative space of reflection to investigate both the complex causality of hybrid natural-cultural disasters and different modalities of human responses to them.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Rigby, Kate},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {153--176},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Theodor Storm's novella Der Schimmelreiter is set in northwestern Germany, a region with a long history of dyke building and coastal flooding. Drawing on insights into material agency, complexity, and the entwinement of materiality and discourse that have emerged from science studies, I read this text as an exploration of distributed agency that challenges humanist assumptions about both “man” and “nature” by disclosing the limits of rational human mastery in the face of unruly natural phenomena, both “inner” and “outer.” At the same time, the multiple narrative frames of this tragic tale foreground the ineluctable force of viewpoint in any narrative performance of ecocatastrophe. As such, it exemplifies how narrative fiction can provide an imaginative space of reflection to investigate both the complex causality of hybrid natural-cultural disasters and different modalities of human responses to them.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Art, Nature, and the Poesy of Plants in the Goethezeit: A Biosemiotic Perspective.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kate Rigby.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 23–44. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Art,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rigby_art_2015,\n\ttitle = {Art, {Nature}, and the {Poesy} of {Plants} in the {Goethezeit}: {A} {Biosemiotic} {Perspective}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\tshorttitle = {Art, {Nature}, and the {Poesy} of {Plants} in the {Goethezeit}},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.rigby.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0000},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Rigby, Kate},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {23--44},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Riordan, C.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Green thought in German culture: historical and contemporary perspectives.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Colin Riordan.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n University of Wales Press, Cardiff, 1997.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{riordan_green_1997,\n\taddress = {Cardiff},\n\ttitle = {Green thought in {German} culture: historical and contemporary perspectives},\n\tisbn = {978-0-7083-1421-0},\n\tshorttitle = {Green thought in {German} culture},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {University of Wales Press},\n\tauthor = {Riordan, Colin},\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tkeywords = {Civilization, Environmentalism, Germany, Green movement, Intellectual life},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Schaumann, C.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Speaking Stones: Material Agency and Interaction in Christian Enzensberger’s Geschichte der Natur.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Caroline Schaumann.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Caroline Schaumann; and Heather I. Sullivan., editor(s), German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene, pages 165–182. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"SpeakingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{schaumann_speaking_2017,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\ttitle = {Speaking {Stones}: {Material} {Agency} and {Interaction} in {Christian} {Enzensberger}’s {Geschichte} der {Natur}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-137-55985-2 978-1-137-54222-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Speaking {Stones}},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_10},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tbooktitle = {German {Ecocriticism} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave Macmillan US},\n\tauthor = {Schaumann, Caroline},\n\teditor = {Schaumann, Caroline and Sullivan, Heather I.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9_10},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism},\n\tpages = {165--182},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Stobbe, U.\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: Graduiertenkolleg Interdisziplinäre Umweltgeschichte, Seminar für Deutsche Philologie.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maren Ermisch; Ulrike Kruse; and Urte Stobbe.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{ermisch_okologische_2010,\n\taddress = {Göttingen},\n\ttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen: {Graduiertenkolleg} {Interdisziplinäre} {Umweltgeschichte}, {Seminar} für {Deutsche} {Philologie}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-941875-86-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Ökologische transformationen und literarische repräsentationen},\n\tabstract = {Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to "nature" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Universitätsverlag Göttingen},\n\tauthor = {Ermisch, Maren and Kruse, Ulrike and Stobbe, Urte},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Ecology in literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Since the 1990s, questions about the relationship between changes in the natural environment and their literary representations have been subsumed and discussed in the field of literary studies under the term Ecocriticism. In this volume, environmental historical perspectives are also included in the discussion. On the one hand, one must ask how the change in the human relationship to \"nature\" (and the changing nuances of meaning of this term) is negotiated in literary texts at different times and which new literary forms of expression it may provoke. On the other hand, one must also ask how literary and cultural patterns can affect the design of the natural environment. To what extent do literary models of change correspond diachronically and synchronously with change processes in nature? This double question also includes the possibility of a reciprocal critique of environmental historical and literary perspectives.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecocriticism: eine Einführung.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; and Urte Stobbe.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Böhlau-Studien-Bücher. Grundlagen des StudiumsBöhlau Verlag, Köln, 2015.\n HOLLIS number: 990145421240203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecocriticism_2015,\n\taddress = {Köln},\n\tseries = {Böhlau-{Studien}-{Bücher}. {Grundlagen} des {Studiums}},\n\ttitle = {Ecocriticism: eine {Einführung}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-412-50165-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Ecocriticism},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Böhlau Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990145421240203941},\n\tkeywords = {Critical theory, Ecocriticism, History and criticism, In art, In motion pictures, Literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecological thought in German literature and culture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; Urte Stobbe; Hubert Zapf; and Evi Zemanek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ecocritical theory and practiceLexington Books, Lanham, Maryland, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecological_2017,\n\taddress = {Lanham, Maryland},\n\tseries = {Ecocritical theory and practice},\n\ttitle = {Ecological thought in {German} literature and culture},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4985-1492-7},\n\tabstract = {"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms." -- Book jacket.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Lexington Books},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte and Zapf, Hubert and Zemanek, Evi},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Arts, Ecology in literature, German literature, Germany, History, History and criticism, Intellectual life},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms.\" – Book jacket.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Sullivan, H.\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Ecologies of Color: Goethe’s Materialist Optics and Ecological Posthumanism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather I Sullivan.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Serenella Iovino; and Serpil Oppermann., editor(s), Material Ecocriticism, pages 80–94. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{sullivan_ecologies_2014,\n\taddress = {Bloomington, IN},\n\ttitle = {The {Ecologies} of {Color}: {Goethe}’s {Materialist} {Optics} and {Ecological} {Posthumanism}},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tbooktitle = {Material {Ecocriticism}},\n\tpublisher = {Indiana University Press},\n\tauthor = {Sullivan, Heather I},\n\teditor = {Iovino, Serenella and Oppermann, Serpil},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism},\n\tpages = {80--94},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Challenge of Ecology to the Humanities: An Introduction.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather I. Sullivan; and Bernhard F. Malkmus.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German critique, 43(2): 1–20. 2016.\n Publisher: Duke University Press\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sullivan_challenge_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {Challenge} of {Ecology} to the {Humanities}: {An} {Introduction}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Challenge} of {Ecology} to the {Humanities}},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511835},\n\tabstract = {The introduction to\nsketches out the ambiguous response of the humanities to the long-term anthropological thinking about the human as an ecological being from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and the more recent constructivist worldviews typically discrediting biological thinking about humans as intrinsically “essentialist” and “nature” as cultural fabrication. The global ecological crisis, however, and an increasing awareness of the impact of human activity on the planet's ecosystems have forced the humanities to reassess such anthropological and biological assumptions. Recent strategies of the environmental humanities include either reformulating classic humanism with ecological frames or seeking alternative, “posthumanist” perspectives that avoid its inherent anthropocentrism. The special issue puts voices from historical, philosophical, and literary disciplines in dialogue with each other, with the goal of mapping out various possibilities for both the humanities and the environmental humanities.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {New German critique},\n\tauthor = {Sullivan, Heather I. and Malkmus, Bernhard F.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Duke University Press},\n\tkeywords = {Environmental Studies, European Studies, Theory and Philosophy},\n\tpages = {1--20},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The introduction to sketches out the ambiguous response of the humanities to the long-term anthropological thinking about the human as an ecological being from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and the more recent constructivist worldviews typically discrediting biological thinking about humans as intrinsically “essentialist” and “nature” as cultural fabrication. The global ecological crisis, however, and an increasing awareness of the impact of human activity on the planet's ecosystems have forced the humanities to reassess such anthropological and biological assumptions. Recent strategies of the environmental humanities include either reformulating classic humanism with ecological frames or seeking alternative, “posthumanist” perspectives that avoid its inherent anthropocentrism. The special issue puts voices from historical, philosophical, and literary disciplines in dialogue with each other, with the goal of mapping out various possibilities for both the humanities and the environmental humanities.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Nature and the “Dark Pastoral” in Goethe’s Werther.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Heather I. Sullivan.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Goethe Yearbook, 22(1): 115–132. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NaturePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sullivan_nature_2015,\n\ttitle = {Nature and the “{Dark} {Pastoral}” in {Goethe}’s {Werther}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1940-9087},\n\turl = {https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/goethe_yearbook/v022/22.sullivan.html},\n\tdoi = {10.1353/gyr.2015.0024},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Goethe Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Sullivan, Heather I.},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Ecocriticism, Goethe Yearbook 2015},\n\tpages = {115--132},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Swope, C.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Is Green the New Red? Marxism, Ecology, and Contemporary Architectural Theory.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Curtis Swope.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Humanities, 10(1): 45. 2021.\n Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{swope_is_2021,\n\ttitle = {Is {Green} the {New} {Red}? {Marxism}, {Ecology}, and {Contemporary} {Architectural} {Theory}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/},\n\tshorttitle = {Is {Green} the {New} {Red}?},\n\turl = {https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/10/1/45},\n\tdoi = {10.3390/h10010045},\n\tabstract = {This essay examines the role of Marxist concepts in recent architectural theories of ecology using two architecture firms, Estudio Teddy Cruz and Sauerbruch Hutton (SH), as case studies. In their writings, Cruz and SH mobilize the critique of capital, a dialectical materialist understanding of history, and the Frankfurt School’s critique of functionalist culture for the theorization of sustainable design. Their work has two vital ramifications for current sustainability discourses in two different fields which this essay seeks to bridge. For Marxist theorists concerned about ecology but averse to Western Marxism because of its supposed idealism, Cruz and SH show anew the importance of aesthetic concerns to conceptions of the environment. For design scholars accustomed to thinking of Marxism as having been absorbed into broader debates about cultural studies, the architects’ theories have the potential to recentralize the left-wing inheritance through its adaptation to concerns of ecology. In addition, in the essay’s conclusion, I reflect briefly, as a suggestion for further research, on how Cruz’s and SH’s architectural practice and theories might productively be analyzed in light of the terms of the Adorno-Benjamin debate of the 1930s over the political status of the cultural products of capital. Can eighty-year old discussions of the potentially revolutionary and retrograde qualities of mass cultural objects be relevant to radical thought in the age of climate change.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {Humanities},\n\tauthor = {Swope, Curtis},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 1\nPublisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},\n\tkeywords = {Berlin, Bertlolt Brecht, Ernst Bloch, Frankfurt School, Marxism, Sauerbruch Hutton, Teddy Cruz, Theodor Adorno, Tijuana, Walter Benjamin, contemporary architecture, ecology, green architecture, materia},\n\tpages = {45},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This essay examines the role of Marxist concepts in recent architectural theories of ecology using two architecture firms, Estudio Teddy Cruz and Sauerbruch Hutton (SH), as case studies. In their writings, Cruz and SH mobilize the critique of capital, a dialectical materialist understanding of history, and the Frankfurt School’s critique of functionalist culture for the theorization of sustainable design. Their work has two vital ramifications for current sustainability discourses in two different fields which this essay seeks to bridge. For Marxist theorists concerned about ecology but averse to Western Marxism because of its supposed idealism, Cruz and SH show anew the importance of aesthetic concerns to conceptions of the environment. For design scholars accustomed to thinking of Marxism as having been absorbed into broader debates about cultural studies, the architects’ theories have the potential to recentralize the left-wing inheritance through its adaptation to concerns of ecology. In addition, in the essay’s conclusion, I reflect briefly, as a suggestion for further research, on how Cruz’s and SH’s architectural practice and theories might productively be analyzed in light of the terms of the Adorno-Benjamin debate of the 1930s over the political status of the cultural products of capital. Can eighty-year old discussions of the potentially revolutionary and retrograde qualities of mass cultural objects be relevant to radical thought in the age of climate change.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Wilczek, M.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Water and Words: Narrating Sustainability.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Markus Wilczek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n New German Critique, 43(2 (128)): 177–197. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WaterPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{wilczek_water_2016,\n\ttitle = {Water and {Words}: {Narrating} {Sustainability}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tissn = {0094-033X},\n\tshorttitle = {Water and {Words}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511931},\n\tdoi = {10.1215/0094033X-3511931},\n\tabstract = {This article considers the significance of temporality for the discourses of ecology and posthumanism. Focusing on Goethe's approach to water both in his administrative and in his literary writings, it argues that literary texts provide an opportunity to experiment with forms of stability in continuity, and in this way to rehearse an outlook on the future that meets the demands of sustainability. Based on close readings of Goethe's writings, the article suggests that the need to come to terms with the uncertainty of a very distant future pits formalization and abstraction against concrete narrative imagination, resulting in a tensed relationship between the spatial and temporal dimension of ecology.},\n\tnumber = {2 (128)},\n\turldate = {2021-11-04},\n\tjournal = {New German Critique},\n\tauthor = {Wilczek, Markus},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {177--197},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article considers the significance of temporality for the discourses of ecology and posthumanism. Focusing on Goethe's approach to water both in his administrative and in his literary writings, it argues that literary texts provide an opportunity to experiment with forms of stability in continuity, and in this way to rehearse an outlook on the future that meets the demands of sustainability. Based on close readings of Goethe's writings, the article suggests that the need to come to terms with the uncertainty of a very distant future pits formalization and abstraction against concrete narrative imagination, resulting in a tensed relationship between the spatial and temporal dimension of ecology.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Wilke, S.\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n German culture and the modern environmental imagination: narrating and depicting nature.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sabine Wilke.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Nature, culture and literatureBrill Rodopi, Leiden ; Boston, 2015.\n HOLLIS number: 990143658320203941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{wilke_german_2015,\n\taddress = {Leiden ; Boston},\n\tseries = {Nature, culture and literature},\n\ttitle = {German culture and the modern environmental imagination: narrating and depicting nature},\n\tisbn = {978-90-04-29785-2},\n\tshorttitle = {German culture and the modern environmental imagination},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\tpublisher = {Brill Rodopi},\n\tauthor = {Wilke, Sabine},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 990143658320203941},\n\tkeywords = {Bierstadt, Albert, 1830-1902, Geographical perception, Germany, Herzog, Werner, 1942-, History, Humboldt, Alexander von, 1769-1859, Nature in art, Nature in literature, Nature in motion pictures, Philosophy of nature, Riefenstahl, Leni},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Zapf, H.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Literature as Cultural Ecology. Sustainable Texts.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hubert Zapf.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{zapf_literature_2016,\n\ttitle = {Literature as {Cultural} {Ecology}. {Sustainable} {Texts}.},\n\tauthor = {Zapf, Hubert},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecological thought in German literature and culture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; Urte Stobbe; Hubert Zapf; and Evi Zemanek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ecocritical theory and practiceLexington Books, Lanham, Maryland, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecological_2017,\n\taddress = {Lanham, Maryland},\n\tseries = {Ecocritical theory and practice},\n\ttitle = {Ecological thought in {German} literature and culture},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4985-1492-7},\n\tabstract = {"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms." -- Book jacket.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Lexington Books},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte and Zapf, Hubert and Zemanek, Evi},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Arts, Ecology in literature, German literature, Germany, History, History and criticism, Intellectual life},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms.\" – Book jacket.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n Zemanek, E.\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ökologische Genres: Naturästhetik, Umweltethik, Wissenspoetik.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Evi Zemanek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Umwelt und Gesellschaft ; Bd. 16Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2018.\n HOLLIS number: 99153680558603941\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{zemanek_okologische_2018,\n\taddress = {Göttingen},\n\tseries = {Umwelt und {Gesellschaft} ; {Bd}. 16},\n\ttitle = {Ökologische {Genres}: {Naturästhetik}, {Umweltethik}, {Wissenspoetik}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-525-31721-1},\n\tshorttitle = {Ökologische {Genres}},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tpublisher = {Vandenhoeck \\& Ruprecht},\n\tauthor = {Zemanek, Evi},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {HOLLIS number: 99153680558603941},\n\tkeywords = {Congresses, Ecocriticism, Ecology in literature, Environment (Aesthetics), Environmental ethics, Environmentalism in literature},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ecological thought in German literature and culture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gabriele Dürbeck; Urte Stobbe; Hubert Zapf; and Evi Zemanek.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ecocritical theory and practiceLexington Books, Lanham, Maryland, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{durbeck_ecological_2017,\n\taddress = {Lanham, Maryland},\n\tseries = {Ecocritical theory and practice},\n\ttitle = {Ecological thought in {German} literature and culture},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4985-1492-7},\n\tabstract = {"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms." -- Book jacket.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Lexington Books},\n\tauthor = {Dürbeck, Gabriele and Stobbe, Urte and Zapf, Hubert and Zemanek, Evi},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Arts, Ecology in literature, German literature, Germany, History, History and criticism, Intellectual life},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"The volume surveys the contribution of German literature and culture to the evolution of ecological thought. As the field of ecocritical theory and practice expands towards transnational and global dimensions, it is necessary to consider the distinct manifestations of ecological thought in various cultures. In this sense, this volume demonstrates how German literature, philosophy, art, and science have contributed in unique ways to the emergence of ecological thought on a national and transnational scale. It maps the most important and characteristic of these developments both on a theoretical and on a textual-analytical level through five parts discussing proto-ecological thought since early modern times, major theoretical approaches, environmental history, ecocritical case studies, and ecological visions in different media and art forms.\" – Book jacket.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n undefined\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Readings in the Anthropocene.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sabine Wilke; and Japhet Johnstone.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of New Directions in German StudiesBloomsbury Academic, 1st edition, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{sabine_wilke_readings_2017,\n\tedition = {1st},\n\tseries = {New {Directions} in {German} {Studies}},\n\ttitle = {Readings in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-5013-0775-1},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tpublisher = {Bloomsbury Academic},\n\teditor = {{Sabine Wilke} and Johnstone, Japhet},\n\tcollaborator = {Frost, Sabine and Goodbody, Axel and Groves, Jason and Ireton, Sean},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Caroline Schaumann; and Heather I. Sullivan.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GermanPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{schaumann_german_2017,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\ttitle = {German {Ecocriticism} in the {Anthropocene}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-137-55985-2 978-1-137-54222-9},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-12-17},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave Macmillan US},\n\teditor = {Schaumann, Caroline and Sullivan, Heather I.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);