var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F4695391%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DgOUOgVBZemqERoSIQtIxhuVs%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F4695391%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DgOUOgVBZemqERoSIQtIxhuVs%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fgroups%2F4695391%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DgOUOgVBZemqERoSIQtIxhuVs%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
    2. \n
  2. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
    3. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2021\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Communication Turn in Philosophy of Science.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leydesdorff, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In The Evolutionary Dynamics of Discursive Knowledge: Communication-Theoretical Perspectives on an Empirical Philosophy of Science, of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication, pages 39–50. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@incollection{leydesdorff_communication_2021,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\tseries = {Qualitative and {Quantitative} {Analysis} of {Scientific} and {Scholarly} {Communication}},\n\ttitle = {The {Communication} {Turn} in {Philosophy} of {Science}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-030-59951-5},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5_2},\n\tabstract = {Whereas knowledge has often been attributed to individuals or, from a sociological perspective, to communities, a communications perspective on the sciences enables us to proceed to the measurement of the discursive knowledge contents. Knowledge claims are organized into texts which are entrained in evolving structures. The aggregated citation relations among journals, for example, can be used to visualize disciplinary structures. The structures are reproduced as “ecosystems” which differ among them in terms of using specific codes in the communications (e.g., jargons). Unlike biological DNA, these codes are not hard-wired; they can be changed in the communication. The sciences develop historically along trajectories embedded in regimes of expectations. Regimes exert selection pressure on the historical manifestations. The evolutionary dynamics at the regime level induce crises, bifurcations, etc., as historical events.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-06-30},\n\tbooktitle = {The {Evolutionary} {Dynamics} of {Discursive} {Knowledge}: {Communication}-{Theoretical} {Perspectives} on an {Empirical} {Philosophy} of {Science}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n\tauthor = {Leydesdorff, Loet},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5_2},\n\tpages = {39--50},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Whereas knowledge has often been attributed to individuals or, from a sociological perspective, to communities, a communications perspective on the sciences enables us to proceed to the measurement of the discursive knowledge contents. Knowledge claims are organized into texts which are entrained in evolving structures. The aggregated citation relations among journals, for example, can be used to visualize disciplinary structures. The structures are reproduced as “ecosystems” which differ among them in terms of using specific codes in the communications (e.g., jargons). Unlike biological DNA, these codes are not hard-wired; they can be changed in the communication. The sciences develop historically along trajectories embedded in regimes of expectations. Regimes exert selection pressure on the historical manifestations. The evolutionary dynamics at the regime level induce crises, bifurcations, etc., as historical events.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Paradoxes of Rationalisation: Openness and Control in Critical Theory and Luhmann's Systems Theory.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Overwijk, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Theory, Culture & Society, 38(1): 127–148. January 2021.\n Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ParadoxesPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{overwijk_paradoxes_2021,\n\ttitle = {Paradoxes of {Rationalisation}: {Openness} and {Control} in {Critical} {Theory} and {Luhmann}'s {Systems} {Theory}},\n\tvolume = {38},\n\tissn = {0263-2764},\n\tshorttitle = {Paradoxes of {Rationalisation}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420925548},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0263276420925548},\n\tabstract = {For the Critical Theory tradition of the Frankfurt School, rationalisation is a central concept that refers to the socio-cultural closure of capitalist modernity due to the proliferation of technical, ?instrumental? rationality at the expense of some form of political reason. This picture of rationalisation, however, hinges on a separation of technology and politics that is both empirically and philosophically problematic. This article aims to re-conceptualise the rationalisation thesis through a survey of research from science and technology studies and the conceptual framework of Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. It argues that rationalisation indeed exhibits a logic of closure, namely the ?operational closure? of sociotechnical systems of measurement, but that this closure in fact produces the historical logics of technical reason and, paradoxically, also generates spaces of critical-political openness. This opens up the theoretical and practical opportunity of connecting the politically just to the technically efficient.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Theory, Culture \\& Society},\n\tauthor = {Overwijk, Jan},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd},\n\tpages = {127--148},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n For the Critical Theory tradition of the Frankfurt School, rationalisation is a central concept that refers to the socio-cultural closure of capitalist modernity due to the proliferation of technical, ?instrumental? rationality at the expense of some form of political reason. This picture of rationalisation, however, hinges on a separation of technology and politics that is both empirically and philosophically problematic. This article aims to re-conceptualise the rationalisation thesis through a survey of research from science and technology studies and the conceptual framework of Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. It argues that rationalisation indeed exhibits a logic of closure, namely the ?operational closure? of sociotechnical systems of measurement, but that this closure in fact produces the historical logics of technical reason and, paradoxically, also generates spaces of critical-political openness. This opens up the theoretical and practical opportunity of connecting the politically just to the technically efficient.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2020\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n O cenário “Pós-Luhmanniano” e a América Latina: Entrevistas com Marcelo Neves E Aldo Mascareño.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli-Ocampo, S.; and Brasil, A. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociologia & Antropologia, 10(1): 15–72. April 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignuoli-ocampo_o_2020,\n\ttitle = {O cenário “{Pós}-{Luhmanniano}” e a {América} {Latina}: {Entrevistas} com {Marcelo} {Neves} {E} {Aldo} {Mascareño}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tissn = {2238-3875, 2236-7527},\n\tshorttitle = {O cenário “{Pós}-{Luhmanniano}” e a {América} {Latina}: {Entrevistas} com {Marcelo} {Neves} {E} {Aldo} {Mascareño}},\n\turl = {http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752020000100015&tlng=pt},\n\tdoi = {10.1590/2238-38752019v1011},\n\tabstract = {Resumo Em finais de 2019, entrevistamos por e-mail os professores Marcelo Neves e Aldo Mascareño, sugerindo-lhes um eixo comum de perguntas sobre suas trajetórias e sobre os principais desafios envolvidos na tarefa de aclimatar a teoria dos sistemas sociais de Niklas Luhmann ao contexto latino-americano. Além das duas entrevistas, fizemos uma sucinta apresentação do que denominamos cenário “pós-luhmanniano” e do potencial da recepção latino-americana para a renovação do legado sistêmico no presente, incluindo breve exploração bibliométrica de alguns padrões dessa recepção.\n          , \n            Abstract At the end of 2019, we interviewed by email Professors Marcelo Neves and Aldo Mascareño, presenting them with a similar list of questions on their intellectual trajectories and the principal challenges involved in the task of adapting Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory to the Latin American context. As well as the two interviews, we provide a brief presentation of what we call the ‘post-Luhmannian’ scenario and the potential for its Latin American reception to renew the systemic legacy in the present, including a short bibliometric exploration of some of the patterns evident in this reception.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-03-30},\n\tjournal = {Sociologia \\& Antropologia},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli-Ocampo, Sergio and Brasil, Antonio Jr.},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tpages = {15--72},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Resumo Em finais de 2019, entrevistamos por e-mail os professores Marcelo Neves e Aldo Mascareño, sugerindo-lhes um eixo comum de perguntas sobre suas trajetórias e sobre os principais desafios envolvidos na tarefa de aclimatar a teoria dos sistemas sociais de Niklas Luhmann ao contexto latino-americano. Além das duas entrevistas, fizemos uma sucinta apresentação do que denominamos cenário “pós-luhmanniano” e do potencial da recepção latino-americana para a renovação do legado sistêmico no presente, incluindo breve exploração bibliométrica de alguns padrões dessa recepção. , Abstract At the end of 2019, we interviewed by email Professors Marcelo Neves and Aldo Mascareño, presenting them with a similar list of questions on their intellectual trajectories and the principal challenges involved in the task of adapting Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory to the Latin American context. As well as the two interviews, we provide a brief presentation of what we call the ‘post-Luhmannian’ scenario and the potential for its Latin American reception to renew the systemic legacy in the present, including a short bibliometric exploration of some of the patterns evident in this reception.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n What Kind of Communication in the Age of Machines?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Chudý, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Socialni Studia/Social Studies, 17(2): 93–110. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{chudy_what_2020,\n\ttitle = {What {Kind} of {Communication} in the {Age} of {Machines}?},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tdoi = {10.5817/SOC2020-2-93},\n\tabstract = {Communication, at least that which is potentially human-independent, makes the issue of what is actually communicated come to the fore. The whole set-up is new: real-time filtration and selection cast doubt on the idea of communication of objective representations. That is why the bundle signal-data-information-sign-message must be analysed, taking into account the possibility that communicative quanta can teleact by themselves. Distinguishing technogenic interactivity and natural interaction produces the concept of infogenic man, which facilitates a new definition of information as opposed to signal, but also serves well if applied to machine communication. A feature that helps discern data and information is the increase of complexity level. The key to communication, taking into account the machine context, is the interest in being “wired”; Luhmann’s theory of communication, based on triple selection (information, conveyance, understanding), is especially well-positioned to meet the demands of today’s technogenic communication. Non-linearity and analysis of the mechanisms for putting up with contingency are among the advantages of Luhmann’s theory, which also provides a framework to capture and distinguish the human and technogenic communicative factors. © 2020. All Rights Reserved.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Socialni Studia/Social Studies},\n\tauthor = {Chudý, Thomas},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tkeywords = {autopoiesis, communication, complexity, difference, information, selection, signal},\n\tpages = {93--110},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Communication, at least that which is potentially human-independent, makes the issue of what is actually communicated come to the fore. The whole set-up is new: real-time filtration and selection cast doubt on the idea of communication of objective representations. That is why the bundle signal-data-information-sign-message must be analysed, taking into account the possibility that communicative quanta can teleact by themselves. Distinguishing technogenic interactivity and natural interaction produces the concept of infogenic man, which facilitates a new definition of information as opposed to signal, but also serves well if applied to machine communication. A feature that helps discern data and information is the increase of complexity level. The key to communication, taking into account the machine context, is the interest in being “wired”; Luhmann’s theory of communication, based on triple selection (information, conveyance, understanding), is especially well-positioned to meet the demands of today’s technogenic communication. Non-linearity and analysis of the mechanisms for putting up with contingency are among the advantages of Luhmann’s theory, which also provides a framework to capture and distinguish the human and technogenic communicative factors. © 2020. All Rights Reserved.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las ciencias sociales sistémicas y la pandemia del coronavirus.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Arnold-Cathalifaud, M.; Pignuoli-Ocampo, S.; and Dockendorff, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (68): 167–180. September 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{arnold-cathalifaud_ciencias_2020,\n\ttitle = {Las ciencias sociales sistémicas y la pandemia del coronavirus},\n\tissn = {0717-554X},\n\turl = {https://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/58588},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tDada la multiplicidad de planos que acompañan a las observaciones de la actual pandemia, importa identificar aquellas que alcanzan una mayor resonancia. Así, observamos cómo los ciudadanos y los agentes de decisión han incrementado sus demandas de informaciones validadas por medio de la aplicación de la racionalidad, los métodos y los procedimientos de la ciencia de manera exponencial. En este trabajo desarrollamos en forma sintética un conjunto seleccionado de lineamientos sobre cómo se aborda la actual pandemia desde las ciencias sociales sistémicas, para luego exponer algunas de sus propuestas respecto a las condiciones, a nivel organizacional, las cuales podrían permitir alcanzar los niveles de diálogo y cooperación requeridos para enfrentar la pandemia actual.},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\tnumber = {68},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Arnold-Cathalifaud, Marcelo and Pignuoli-Ocampo, Sergio and Dockendorff, Daniela},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tpages = {167--180},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Resumen Dada la multiplicidad de planos que acompañan a las observaciones de la actual pandemia, importa identificar aquellas que alcanzan una mayor resonancia. Así, observamos cómo los ciudadanos y los agentes de decisión han incrementado sus demandas de informaciones validadas por medio de la aplicación de la racionalidad, los métodos y los procedimientos de la ciencia de manera exponencial. En este trabajo desarrollamos en forma sintética un conjunto seleccionado de lineamientos sobre cómo se aborda la actual pandemia desde las ciencias sociales sistémicas, para luego exponer algunas de sus propuestas respecto a las condiciones, a nivel organizacional, las cuales podrían permitir alcanzar los niveles de diálogo y cooperación requeridos para enfrentar la pandemia actual.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2019\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cruz Herrera, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NiklasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@misc{cruz_herrera_niklas_2019,\n\ttitle = {Niklas {Luhmann}},\n\turl = {https://slideplayer.es/slide/13707658/},\n\tauthor = {Cruz Herrera, Isabel},\n\tyear = {2019},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La relación individuo-sociedad en la teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cárcamo Petridis, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (41): 56–67. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{carcamo_petridis_relacion_2019,\n\ttitle = {La relación individuo-sociedad en la teoría de sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/57609},\n\tnumber = {41},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Cárcamo Petridis, Pedro},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {56--67},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Género como medio de comunicación simbólicamente generalizado: un análisis sistémico.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Armenta-Galaviz, T. G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (40): 1–13–1–13. November 2019.\n Number: 40\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GéneroPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{armenta-galaviz_genero_2019,\n\ttitle = {Género como medio de comunicación simbólicamente generalizado: un análisis sistémico},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2019},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\tshorttitle = {Género como medio de comunicación simbólicamente generalizado},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/54829},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/0719-0527.2019.54829},\n\tabstract = {El artículo analiza al género desde la teoría de los sistemas sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Para ello, el artículo aborda el análisis de la complejidad del sistema y la interacción con las expectativas de comportamiento mediante los mecanismos de operación de los medios de comunicación simbólicamente generalizados, código, programas y roles que derivan de este. Desde esta base, se analiza el concepto de género, considerándolo como un medio de comunicación simbólicamente generalizado, abordando la vinculación de la selección y la motivación con el condicionamiento de las expectativas del comportamiento de las personas.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {40},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Armenta-Galaviz, Tania Galaviz},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {Number: 40},\n\tpages = {1--13--1--13},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El artículo analiza al género desde la teoría de los sistemas sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Para ello, el artículo aborda el análisis de la complejidad del sistema y la interacción con las expectativas de comportamiento mediante los mecanismos de operación de los medios de comunicación simbólicamente generalizados, código, programas y roles que derivan de este. Desde esta base, se analiza el concepto de género, considerándolo como un medio de comunicación simbólicamente generalizado, abordando la vinculación de la selección y la motivación con el condicionamiento de las expectativas del comportamiento de las personas.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n N. Luhmann’s Theory of Systems in the Application to the Analysis of Scientific Communication.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pogozhina, N. N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(1): 225–232. January 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"N.Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pogozhina_n_2019,\n\ttitle = {N. {Luhmann}’s {Theory} of {Systems} in the {Application} to the {Analysis} of {Scientific} {Communication}},\n\tvolume = {56},\n\turl = {https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=eps&id=eps_2019_0056_0001_0225_0232},\n\tdoi = {10.5840/eps201956119},\n\tabstract = {This article represents the review of the Russian translation of N. Lumann’s work which was published under the title «Truth, knowledge, science as a system». In article N. Lumann’s approach to consideration of science as one of the communicative systems of society performing function on development of knowledge is reconstructed. Within this approach we consider in a separate way the the truthconditional perspective which is expressed by means of terms of language of the theory symbolically the generalized of media of communications. Special attention is paid to the potential of the reconstructed theory in the analysis of modern scientific community and to the relation of scientific system to other communicative systems (its differentiation from them and the possibility of interaction).},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Epistemology \\& Philosophy of Science},\n\tauthor = {Pogozhina, Natalya N.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {225--232},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article represents the review of the Russian translation of N. Lumann’s work which was published under the title «Truth, knowledge, science as a system». In article N. Lumann’s approach to consideration of science as one of the communicative systems of society performing function on development of knowledge is reconstructed. Within this approach we consider in a separate way the the truthconditional perspective which is expressed by means of terms of language of the theory symbolically the generalized of media of communications. Special attention is paid to the potential of the reconstructed theory in the analysis of modern scientific community and to the relation of scientific system to other communicative systems (its differentiation from them and the possibility of interaction).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Ethics of Functional Differentiation: Reclaiming Morality in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Valentinov, V.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1): 105–114. March 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{valentinov_ethics_2019,\n\ttitle = {The {Ethics} of {Functional} {Differentiation}: {Reclaiming} {Morality} in {Niklas} {Luhmann}’s {Social} {Systems} {Theory}},\n\tvolume = {155},\n\tissn = {1573-0697},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Ethics} of {Functional} {Differentiation}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3521-7},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s10551-017-3521-7},\n\tabstract = {Niklas Luhmann held a skeptical view of the role of morality in the modern society. The present paper reassesses this skepticism in view of his early work showing the regime of functional differentiation to be supported by fundamental human rights. Building on this argument, the paper advocates a more positive view of morality which is shown to be related to the sustainability of social systems in their encompassing societal and natural environment. This view is warranted by the overarching Luhmannian theme of the precariousness of system–environment relations. If this view is accepted, Luhmann’s work on fundamental human rights can be read as an illustration of moral problems caused by the overexpansion tendencies of the political system. This argument is shown to connect up with the ideas of Buchanan and Rawls, as well as to fit in with the Luhmannian construct of the dilemma of structure and function.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Business Ethics},\n\tauthor = {Valentinov, Vladislav},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {105--114},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Niklas Luhmann held a skeptical view of the role of morality in the modern society. The present paper reassesses this skepticism in view of his early work showing the regime of functional differentiation to be supported by fundamental human rights. Building on this argument, the paper advocates a more positive view of morality which is shown to be related to the sustainability of social systems in their encompassing societal and natural environment. This view is warranted by the overarching Luhmannian theme of the precariousness of system–environment relations. If this view is accepted, Luhmann’s work on fundamental human rights can be read as an illustration of moral problems caused by the overexpansion tendencies of the political system. This argument is shown to connect up with the ideas of Buchanan and Rawls, as well as to fit in with the Luhmannian construct of the dilemma of structure and function.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2018\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Autopoiesis en la teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann: reflexiones para una reontologización.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vidal, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social, 18(3): 26. July 2018.\n No. 3\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AutopoiesisPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{vidal_autopoiesis_2018,\n\ttitle = {Autopoiesis en la teoría de sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}: reflexiones para una reontologización},\n\tvolume = {18},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2018 Josep Pont Vidal},\n\tissn = {1578-8946},\n\tshorttitle = {Autopoiesis en la teoría de sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\turl = {https://atheneadigital.net/article/view/v18-n3-pont},\n\tdoi = {10.5565/rev/athenea.1905},\n\tabstract = {Niklas Luhmann's theory of self-referential systems is a constantly changing theory. A reconceptualization and analysis of the original concept of autopoiesis and its adaptation were considered in this study, with the objective to analyze the possibilities to overcome its biological limitations and exploring communicative possibilities with the existence of a conscience. This procedure will allow to equate the concept with the binomial Luhmannian ego/alter in an explanatory plane of the social order, and present the functional equivalent of the double contingency concept as an operational option for a systemic theory ontologization.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2022-05-21},\n\tjournal = {Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social},\n\tauthor = {Vidal, Josep},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {No. 3},\n\tkeywords = {Autorreferencialidad},\n\tpages = {26},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Niklas Luhmann's theory of self-referential systems is a constantly changing theory. A reconceptualization and analysis of the original concept of autopoiesis and its adaptation were considered in this study, with the objective to analyze the possibilities to overcome its biological limitations and exploring communicative possibilities with the existence of a conscience. This procedure will allow to equate the concept with the binomial Luhmannian ego/alter in an explanatory plane of the social order, and present the functional equivalent of the double contingency concept as an operational option for a systemic theory ontologization.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La recepción de la teoría de los sistemas de Luhmann en la jurisprudencia constitucional colombiana.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ruiz-Manotas, P.; and Bermeo, L. F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Prolegómenos, 21(42): 161–175. 2018.\n Number: 42\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{ruiz-manotas_recepcion_2018,\n\ttitle = {La recepción de la teoría de los sistemas de {Luhmann} en la jurisprudencia constitucional colombiana},\n\tvolume = {21},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2019 Prolegómenos},\n\tissn = {1909-7727},\n\turl = {https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/dere/article/view/3896},\n\tdoi = {10.18359/prole.3896},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {42},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Prolegómenos},\n\tauthor = {Ruiz-Manotas, Paola and Bermeo, Luis Fernando},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {Number: 42},\n\tkeywords = {Autopoiesis, código binario, derecho, moral, política, sistemas},\n\tpages = {161--175},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Realidad y ciencia en el realismo analítico de Talcott Parsons y el constructivismo operativo de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Giordano, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Española de Sociología, 27(1): 9–24. January 2018.\n Number: 1\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"RealidadPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{giordano_realidad_2018,\n\ttitle = {Realidad y ciencia en el realismo analítico de {Talcott} {Parsons} y el constructivismo operativo de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Española de Sociología},\n\tissn = {2445-0367},\n\turl = {https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/res/article/view/65600},\n\tdoi = {10.22325/fes/res.2018.1},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tEl presente ensayo compara las posturas epistemológicas con las que Talcott Parsons y Niklas Luhmann encaran el problema de la adecuación entre conocimiento y realidad, para luego indagar la concepción de ciencia que se desprende de sus respectivas decisiones. A su vez, el modo en que cada uno emplea la noción de sistema constituye un factor de análisis clave, ya que permite entrelazar ambas problemáticas. Para realizar la tarea, primero se examina la epistemología realista analítica de Parsons con foco en la relación entre realidad y ciencia; luego, se realiza el mismo ejercicio con la epistemología constructivista operativa de Luhmann; en tercer lugar, se comparan ambas posturas en busca de similitudes y diferencias que permitan iluminar la naturaleza del vínculo teórico entre ambos autores; finalmente, se concluye que el constructivismo operativo puede leerse en clave de una propuesta que pretende superar las aporías intrínsecas al realismo analítico.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-30},\n\tjournal = {Revista Española de Sociología},\n\tauthor = {Giordano, Pedro},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tkeywords = {Realidad, ciencia, constructivismo operativo, realismo analítico, sistema},\n\tpages = {9--24},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Resumen El presente ensayo compara las posturas epistemológicas con las que Talcott Parsons y Niklas Luhmann encaran el problema de la adecuación entre conocimiento y realidad, para luego indagar la concepción de ciencia que se desprende de sus respectivas decisiones. A su vez, el modo en que cada uno emplea la noción de sistema constituye un factor de análisis clave, ya que permite entrelazar ambas problemáticas. Para realizar la tarea, primero se examina la epistemología realista analítica de Parsons con foco en la relación entre realidad y ciencia; luego, se realiza el mismo ejercicio con la epistemología constructivista operativa de Luhmann; en tercer lugar, se comparan ambas posturas en busca de similitudes y diferencias que permitan iluminar la naturaleza del vínculo teórico entre ambos autores; finalmente, se concluye que el constructivismo operativo puede leerse en clave de una propuesta que pretende superar las aporías intrínsecas al realismo analítico.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Orden social y conflicto en la teoría de los sistemas de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gonnet, J. P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de moebio, (61): 110–122. March 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OrdenPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{gonnet_orden_2018,\n\ttitle = {Orden social y conflicto en la teoría de los sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tissn = {0717-554X},\n\turl = {http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-554X2018000100110&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en},\n\tdoi = {10.4067/S0717-554X2018000100110},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {61},\n\turldate = {2022-03-15},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de moebio},\n\tauthor = {Gonnet, Juan Pablo},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {110--122},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2017\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Repensando los límites de las organizaciones por medio de la teoría de sistemas organizacionales de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Opazo, M. P.; and Rodríguez, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD,21–37. May 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"RepensandoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{opazo_repensando_2017,\n\ttitle = {Repensando los límites de las organizaciones por medio de la teoría de sistemas organizacionales de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/46140},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/rmad.v0i36.46140},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Opazo, Maria Pilar and Rodríguez, Dario},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {21--37},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La comunicación como unidad de análisis en Luhmann y Habermas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli-Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n , 24(73): 61–86. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignuoli-ocampo_comunicacion_2017,\n\ttitle = {La comunicación como unidad de análisis en {Luhmann} y {Habermas}},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\tissn = {1405-1435},\n\turl = {https://www.redalyc.org/journal/105/10550008003/html/},\n\tlanguage = {Spanish},\n\tnumber = {73},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli-Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {61--86},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Critical Review of Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory’s Perspective on Mass Media and Social Media.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gerim, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Journal of Humanity and Society, 7(2): 141–154. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{gerim_critical_2017,\n\ttitle = {A {Critical} {Review} of {Luhmann}’s {Social} {Systems} {Theory}’s {Perspective} on {Mass} {Media} and {Social} {Media}},\n\tvolume = {7},\n\tissn = {2602-2745},\n\turl = {https://insanvetoplum.org/en/issues/7-2/m0218},\n\tabstract = {İlk sayısını Haziran 2011'de çıkaran İnsan \\& Toplum Dergisi, yılda iki kez yayımlanan, hem Türkçe hem de İngilizce yazılara yer veren hakemli bir dergidir. İnsan \\& Toplum, akademik yayın dünyasında görülen iki temel eksikliği duyumsayarak yola çıktı. Bunlardan biri, kendi disipliner sınırlarına hapsolmuş akademyanın insan ve toplumu birbirinden izole ederek ayrıştırarak çalışma yapmasının bir teamül haline gelmiş olmasıdır. İkincisi de, disiplinlerdeki mevcut yaklaşımların ve araştırma biçimlerinin, diğer disiplinler ile iletişime geçme ve onlardan faydalanma yollarını giderek tüketiyor olmasıdır. İnsan \\& Toplum bu eksikliklerden hareketle, insana ve topluma dair problemleri ele alan özgün ve eleştirel çalışmaları yayımlamayı kendisine ilke edinmiştir. Bu anlamda sosyal bilimler, beşeri bilimler ve dini ilimler alanında yapılan tüm çalışmalara açıktır. İnsan ve Toplum'da mevcut akademinin dar disipliner yaklaşımlarının ötesine geçme kaygısı taşıyan yazılar öncelenmektedir. Ancak bunu yaparken disipliner yetkinliğe de önem verilmekte; kendi disiplinini içselleştirememiş disiplinlerarası ya da çoklu-disiplinli çalışmalardan ziyade hem kendi disiplininin hem de diğer disiplinlerin yöntem ve kuramlarını kullanabilen nitelikli çalışmaları yayımlamak tercih edilmektedir.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Humanity and Society},\n\tauthor = {Gerim, Giray},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {141--154},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n İlk sayısını Haziran 2011'de çıkaran İnsan & Toplum Dergisi, yılda iki kez yayımlanan, hem Türkçe hem de İngilizce yazılara yer veren hakemli bir dergidir. İnsan & Toplum, akademik yayın dünyasında görülen iki temel eksikliği duyumsayarak yola çıktı. Bunlardan biri, kendi disipliner sınırlarına hapsolmuş akademyanın insan ve toplumu birbirinden izole ederek ayrıştırarak çalışma yapmasının bir teamül haline gelmiş olmasıdır. İkincisi de, disiplinlerdeki mevcut yaklaşımların ve araştırma biçimlerinin, diğer disiplinler ile iletişime geçme ve onlardan faydalanma yollarını giderek tüketiyor olmasıdır. İnsan & Toplum bu eksikliklerden hareketle, insana ve topluma dair problemleri ele alan özgün ve eleştirel çalışmaları yayımlamayı kendisine ilke edinmiştir. Bu anlamda sosyal bilimler, beşeri bilimler ve dini ilimler alanında yapılan tüm çalışmalara açıktır. İnsan ve Toplum'da mevcut akademinin dar disipliner yaklaşımlarının ötesine geçme kaygısı taşıyan yazılar öncelenmektedir. Ancak bunu yaparken disipliner yetkinliğe de önem verilmekte; kendi disiplinini içselleştirememiş disiplinlerarası ya da çoklu-disiplinli çalışmalardan ziyade hem kendi disiplininin hem de diğer disiplinlerin yöntem ve kuramlarını kullanabilen nitelikli çalışmaları yayımlamak tercih edilmektedir.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Parsons, Luhmann, Spencer Brown. NOR design for double contingency tables.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Roth, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Kybernetes, 46(8): 1469–1482. January 2017.\n Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Parsons,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{roth_parsons_2017,\n\ttitle = {Parsons, {Luhmann}, {Spencer} {Brown}. {NOR} design for double contingency tables},\n\tvolume = {46},\n\tissn = {0368-492X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2017-0176},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/K-05-2017-0176},\n\tabstract = {Purpose Cross tables are omnipresent in management, academia and popular culture. The Matrix has us, despite all criticism, opposition and desire for a way out. This paper draws on the works of three agents of the matrix. The paper shows that Niklas Luhmann criticised Talcott Parsons’ traditional matrix model of society and proceeded to update systems theory, the latest version of which is coded in the formal language of George Spencer Brown. As Luhmann failed to install his updates to all components of his theory platform, however, regular reoccurrences of Parsonian crosstabs are observed, particularly in the Luhmannian differentiation theory, which results in compatibility issues and produces error messages requesting updates. This paper aims to code the missing update translating the basic matrix structure from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on work by Boris Hennig and Louis Kauffman and a yet unpublished manuscript by George Spencer Brown, to demonstrate that the latter introduced his cross as a mark to indicate NOR gates in circuit diagrams. The paper also shows that this NOR gate marker has been taken out of and may be observed to contain the tetralemma, an ancient matrix structure already present in traditional Indian logic. It then proceeds to translate the basic structure of traditional contingency tables into a Spencer Brownian NOR equation and to demonstrate the difference this translation makes in the modelling of social systems. Findings The translation of cross tables from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language results in the design of a both matrix-shaped and compatible test routine that works as a virtual window for the observation of the actually unobservable medium in which a form is drawn, and can be used for consistency checks of expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language. Originality/value This paper quotes from and discusses a so far unpublished manuscript finalised by Spencer Brown in April 1961. The basic matrix structure is translated from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language. A Spencer Brownian NOR matrix is coded that may be used to detect errors in expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language.},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\turldate = {2021-06-30},\n\tjournal = {Kybernetes},\n\tauthor = {Roth, Steffen},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited},\n\tkeywords = {Crosstabs, Design with the NOR, Double contingency, Matrix, Tetralemma, Theory debugging},\n\tpages = {1469--1482},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Purpose Cross tables are omnipresent in management, academia and popular culture. The Matrix has us, despite all criticism, opposition and desire for a way out. This paper draws on the works of three agents of the matrix. The paper shows that Niklas Luhmann criticised Talcott Parsons’ traditional matrix model of society and proceeded to update systems theory, the latest version of which is coded in the formal language of George Spencer Brown. As Luhmann failed to install his updates to all components of his theory platform, however, regular reoccurrences of Parsonian crosstabs are observed, particularly in the Luhmannian differentiation theory, which results in compatibility issues and produces error messages requesting updates. This paper aims to code the missing update translating the basic matrix structure from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on work by Boris Hennig and Louis Kauffman and a yet unpublished manuscript by George Spencer Brown, to demonstrate that the latter introduced his cross as a mark to indicate NOR gates in circuit diagrams. The paper also shows that this NOR gate marker has been taken out of and may be observed to contain the tetralemma, an ancient matrix structure already present in traditional Indian logic. It then proceeds to translate the basic structure of traditional contingency tables into a Spencer Brownian NOR equation and to demonstrate the difference this translation makes in the modelling of social systems. Findings The translation of cross tables from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language results in the design of a both matrix-shaped and compatible test routine that works as a virtual window for the observation of the actually unobservable medium in which a form is drawn, and can be used for consistency checks of expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language. Originality/value This paper quotes from and discusses a so far unpublished manuscript finalised by Spencer Brown in April 1961. The basic matrix structure is translated from Parsonian into Spencer Brownian formal language. A Spencer Brownian NOR matrix is coded that may be used to detect errors in expressions coded in Spencer Brownian formal language.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2016\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Nación y Sociedad-Mundo en la teoría de Niklas Luhmann y algunos de sus continuadores.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lewkow, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Aposta, evista de ciencias sociales, 72: 202–231. September 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{lewkow_nacion_2016,\n\ttitle = {Nación y {Sociedad}-{Mundo} en la teoría de {Niklas} {Luhmann} y algunos de sus continuadores},\n\tvolume = {72},\n\tissn = {1696-7348},\n\turl = {http://www.apostadigital.com/revistav3/hemeroteca/lewkow2.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tjournal = {Aposta, evista de ciencias sociales},\n\tauthor = {Lewkow, Lionel},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {202--231},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2015\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revista Mexicana de Sociología.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n El programa sociológico de Niklas Luhmann y su contexto, 77(2). 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"RevistaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignuoli_revista_2015,\n\ttitle = {Revista {Mexicana} de {Sociología}},\n\tvolume = {77},\n\turl = {http://mexicanadesociologia.unam.mx/index.php/v77n2/6-v77n2a5?fbclid=IwAR3wgXHgn5vuIjT4krUuXA9j1wcOlSp2sQKu9TqsPDbQJLTf6nhlp7rpC5c},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {El programa sociológico de Niklas Luhmann y su contexto},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli, Sergio},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El programa sociológico de Niklas Luhmann y su contexto.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignouli-Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Mexicana de Sociologí­a, 77(2). 2015.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignouli-ocampo_programa_2015,\n\ttitle = {El programa sociológico de {Niklas} {Luhmann} y su contexto},\n\tvolume = {77},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c)},\n\tissn = {2594-0651},\n\turl = {http://revistamexicanadesociologia.unam.mx/index.php/rms/article/view/48247},\n\tdoi = {10.22201/iis.01882503p.2015.2.48247},\n\tabstract = {Este trabajo reconstruye los fundamentos del proyecto disciplinario que el prestigioso sociólogo alemán Niklas Luhmann delineó hacia 1984 mediante la publicación de Soziale Systeme (“Sistemas sociales”). Esta reconstrucción sitúa históricamente dicho proyecto en los contextos histórico, institucional y disciplinario del primer lustro de los años ochenta y enfoca el nuevo lugar que le adjudicó a la comunicación en aquel proyecto. Se sugiere que Luhmann forjó los fundamentos operativos de su giro comunicativo en la tensión entre tradicióny disciplina.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Revista Mexicana de Sociologí­a},\n\tauthor = {Pignouli-Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann., communication, comunicación, social systems theory, sociological theory, teoría de sistemas sociales, teoría sociológica},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Este trabajo reconstruye los fundamentos del proyecto disciplinario que el prestigioso sociólogo alemán Niklas Luhmann delineó hacia 1984 mediante la publicación de Soziale Systeme (“Sistemas sociales”). Esta reconstrucción sitúa históricamente dicho proyecto en los contextos histórico, institucional y disciplinario del primer lustro de los años ochenta y enfoca el nuevo lugar que le adjudicó a la comunicación en aquel proyecto. Se sugiere que Luhmann forjó los fundamentos operativos de su giro comunicativo en la tensión entre tradicióny disciplina.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La disputa por el “cambio de paradigma” en Luhmann, Latour y Habermas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignouli-Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México, 33(99): 501–526. September 2015.\n Number: 99\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignouli-ocampo_disputa_2015,\n\ttitle = {La disputa por el “cambio de paradigma” en {Luhmann}, {Latour} y {Habermas}},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2018 Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México},\n\tissn = {2448-6442},\n\turl = {https://estudiossociologicos.colmex.mx/index.php/es/article/view/1385},\n\tdoi = {10.24201/es.2015v33n99.1385},\n\tabstract = {En este trabajo comparamos los componentes performativos dedicados al cambio de paradigma en la sociología de la Teoría General de Sistemas Sociales de Luhmann, la Teoría de la Red-Actor de Latour y la Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa de Habermas. La hipótesis es que dichos componentes tienen puntos de divergencia, pero también de convergencia. Estos últimos se observan en las estrategias programáticas de diferenciación y articulación dirigidas a enfrentar la “crisis de la sociología” en el contexto disciplinario de los años ochenta y noventa.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {99},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México},\n\tauthor = {Pignouli-Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Number: 99},\n\tkeywords = {Habermas, Latour, Luhmann, componente performativo, paradigma},\n\tpages = {501--526},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n En este trabajo comparamos los componentes performativos dedicados al cambio de paradigma en la sociología de la Teoría General de Sistemas Sociales de Luhmann, la Teoría de la Red-Actor de Latour y la Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa de Habermas. La hipótesis es que dichos componentes tienen puntos de divergencia, pero también de convergencia. Estos últimos se observan en las estrategias programáticas de diferenciación y articulación dirigidas a enfrentar la “crisis de la sociología” en el contexto disciplinario de los años ochenta y noventa.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en la teoría de Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sanchez, M.; and Rojas, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Acta Académica, Argentina, 2015. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@inproceedings{sanchez_tecnologias_2015,\n\taddress = {Argentina},\n\ttitle = {Las {Tecnologías} de la {Información} y de la {Comunicación} en la teoría de {Luhmann}},\n\tcopyright = {CC-BY},\n\turl = {https://www.aacademica.org/000-061/562},\n\tabstract = {El presente trabajo tiene como fin dilucidar la relación existente entre la evolución de las improbabilidades de la comunicación y las estructuras difusivas de la sociedad según la Teoría de Niklas Luhmann. Es pertinente destacar que la comunicación, al sortear las improbabilidades que son inherentes a su unidad, desarrolla ciertos medios que posibilitan y adquieren el carácter necesario para la reproducción autopoiética del sistema social. La sociedad se desarrolla entonces en el medio de la comunicación siendo esta última su unidad fundamental. Teniendo en cuenta que la escritura es la variación que ha sido propiciada por la propia comunicación para sortear las improbabilidades planteadas por la comunicación oral, podríamos encontrarnos en nuestro tiempo ante una nueva reflexión a partir de la articulación de la teoría luhmanniana en torno a las Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación (TIC) y la creciente globalización de la digitalización, internet y redes sociales. Nos planteamos entonces a su vez un nuevo horizonte en relación a la consideración de estas innovaciones y cómo se articulan con los conceptos de tiempo-espacio, y si efectivamente podemos sortear los obstáculos comunicativos en que nos involucra esta nueva forma comunicativa.},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tbooktitle = {Acta {Académica}},\n\tpublisher = {Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires},\n\tauthor = {Sanchez, Melina and Rojas, Juliana},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El presente trabajo tiene como fin dilucidar la relación existente entre la evolución de las improbabilidades de la comunicación y las estructuras difusivas de la sociedad según la Teoría de Niklas Luhmann. Es pertinente destacar que la comunicación, al sortear las improbabilidades que son inherentes a su unidad, desarrolla ciertos medios que posibilitan y adquieren el carácter necesario para la reproducción autopoiética del sistema social. La sociedad se desarrolla entonces en el medio de la comunicación siendo esta última su unidad fundamental. Teniendo en cuenta que la escritura es la variación que ha sido propiciada por la propia comunicación para sortear las improbabilidades planteadas por la comunicación oral, podríamos encontrarnos en nuestro tiempo ante una nueva reflexión a partir de la articulación de la teoría luhmanniana en torno a las Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación (TIC) y la creciente globalización de la digitalización, internet y redes sociales. Nos planteamos entonces a su vez un nuevo horizonte en relación a la consideración de estas innovaciones y cómo se articulan con los conceptos de tiempo-espacio, y si efectivamente podemos sortear los obstáculos comunicativos en que nos involucra esta nueva forma comunicativa.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2014\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Teoría general de sistemas y complejidad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n García-Jiménez, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TeoríaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{garcia-jimenez_teorigeneral_2014,\n\ttitle = {Teoría general de sistemas y complejidad},\n\turl = {www.eumed.net/rev/cccss/27/teoria-sistemas.html},\n\tjournal = {Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {García-Jiménez, Ricardo},\n\tyear = {2014},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La comunicación de la sociedad: Comunicando la teoría de la comunicación de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pérez-Solari, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n September 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@misc{perez-solari_comunicacion_2014,\n\ttype = {Blog especializado},\n\ttitle = {La comunicación de la sociedad: {Comunicando} la teoría de la comunicación de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\turl = {https://sistemassociales.com/la-comunicacion-de-la-sociedad-comunicando-la-teoria-de-la-comunicacion-de-niklas-luhmann/#:~:text=La%20comunicaci%C3%B3n%20no%20es%20una,(Luhmann%201996%2C%201998).},\n\tlanguage = {Spanish},\n\tjournal = {Sistemas Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Pérez-Solari, Felipe},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2014},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La introducción de la teoría de los sistemas de Niklas Luhmann en la filosofía jurídica y social argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Douglas Price, J. E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho, 1(8): 95–124. January 2014.\n Number: 8\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{douglas_price_introduccion_2014,\n\ttitle = {La introducción de la teoría de los sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann} en la filosofía jurídica y social argentina},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2016 Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho},\n\tissn = {2448-7937},\n\turl = {https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/filosofia-derecho/article/view/8162},\n\tdoi = {10.22201/iij.24487937e.2014.8.8162},\n\tabstract = {Una teoría puede ser una explicación de un sector del mundo. Una teoría del derecho pretende ser una explicación de ese fenómeno de comunicación social que llamamos derecho. Pero, Raffaele De Giorgi, tal vez uno  de los máximos responsables de la introducción de la teoría de la luhmanniana en la Argentina (junto a Javier Torres Nafarrate de México, a través de su traducción de las obras de Luhmann al español), pregunta:¿Qué es una teoría de la sociedad? ¿Qué es el “Derecho de la sociedad”? y responde: es que podemos discutir esto?, manos que son manejadas por manos, nada diferente de una prótesis. Y agrega: estamos seguros de que los temas que usamos como objetos o los objetos que utilizamos como temas, son nuestra construcción, pensamos que nos volvemos sobre nosotros mismos, mientras continuamos girando alrededor del vacío.Es una paradoja, u otra paradoja. ¿Es posible salir, deshacerse de estas paradojas? La lógica no nos ayuda. La lógica dice Luhmann, sólo puede ver el hecho de que algunas expresiones, cuya verdad no está disponible, entran en contradicción con otras expresiones, para las cuales vale decir la misma cosa. Usando operaciones lógicas, el problema no puede ser resuelto. Como terapia sistémica la única que podemos ver, con el auxilio de la Gegenparadoxierungen (“contra-paradoja”), es un lugar menos doloroso en el que puede tolerarse el problema. Y recordó que, en cierto sentido, la colocación de la paradoja se realizará con más o menos éxito,  esto es: de manera útil para desbloquear la situación.Y es el uso creativo de paradojas, especialmente uno que se hizo por el Derecho, el que nos permite observar cómo su teoría (la de Luhmann) se ha comenzado a reciclar en las teorías existentes en Argentina. Temas como el problema de la paradojalidad del Derecho, de su ser sin fundamentos y sin comienzo, de la vacuidad de sus principios y la opacidad de sus operaciones y distinciones, se filtran teorías (como las de Carlos Cárcova o Ernesto Grün) y prácticas de la jurisprudencia y puede verse que ha comenzado a remover ese tipo de pensamiento que el profesor de Bielefeld había llamado “vétero europeo”Abstract:A theory can be an explanation of a piece of the world. A theory of law is intended to be an explanation of that phenomenon of social communication which we call Law. But, Raffaele De Giorgi, perhaps the person responsible for the introduction of luhmannian theory in Argentina, (jointly with Torres Nafarrate in Mexico in translating Luhmann’s work to Spanish), asked: What is a theory of society? What is the “Law of society”? And answered: Can we discuss this?, hands managed by hands, nothing different from a prostheses. According to De Giorgi we are sure that the themes that we use as objects or objects that we use as themes, are our construction, we think that we turn around ourselves, while we continue rotating around the vacuum. It is a paradox, or another paradox: ¿Is it possible to get out or get rid of these paradoxes? Logic does not help us. Logic, according to Luhmann, can only see to the fact that some expressions, with unavailable truths, are in contradiction with other expressions, the problem cannot be resolved us- ing logical operations. With the help of Gegenparadoxierungen (against-par- adox), systemic therapy is the alternative where the problem can be toler- ated. And, according to Luhmann, the placement of the paradox should be conducted in a more or less skilled, successful, or useful way to break the logjam.A creative use of paradoxes, especially legal ones, allows us to observe how Luhmann’s theory has impacted existing theories in ArgentinaThemes such as the paradoxality of law, or its being without foundation (and without beginning, the vacuity of their principles and the opacity of its distinctions and operations), filtered theories (like Carlos Cárcova or Ernesto Grün) and jurisprudential practices have started shifting things to what Bielefeld Professor has called “old European”},\n\tlanguage = {es-AR},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho},\n\tauthor = {Douglas Price, Jorge E.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {Number: 8},\n\tkeywords = {Derecho y sociedad, Law and Society, Niklas Luhmann, Nuklas Luhmann, Practical Philosophy in Argentina, Raffaele De Giorgi, Systems Theory, filosofía práctica en Argentina, teoría sistémica},\n\tpages = {95--124},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Una teoría puede ser una explicación de un sector del mundo. Una teoría del derecho pretende ser una explicación de ese fenómeno de comunicación social que llamamos derecho. Pero, Raffaele De Giorgi, tal vez uno  de los máximos responsables de la introducción de la teoría de la luhmanniana en la Argentina (junto a Javier Torres Nafarrate de México, a través de su traducción de las obras de Luhmann al español), pregunta:¿Qué es una teoría de la sociedad? ¿Qué es el “Derecho de la sociedad”? y responde: es que podemos discutir esto?, manos que son manejadas por manos, nada diferente de una prótesis. Y agrega: estamos seguros de que los temas que usamos como objetos o los objetos que utilizamos como temas, son nuestra construcción, pensamos que nos volvemos sobre nosotros mismos, mientras continuamos girando alrededor del vacío.Es una paradoja, u otra paradoja. ¿Es posible salir, deshacerse de estas paradojas? La lógica no nos ayuda. La lógica dice Luhmann, sólo puede ver el hecho de que algunas expresiones, cuya verdad no está disponible, entran en contradicción con otras expresiones, para las cuales vale decir la misma cosa. Usando operaciones lógicas, el problema no puede ser resuelto. Como terapia sistémica la única que podemos ver, con el auxilio de la Gegenparadoxierungen (“contra-paradoja”), es un lugar menos doloroso en el que puede tolerarse el problema. Y recordó que, en cierto sentido, la colocación de la paradoja se realizará con más o menos éxito,  esto es: de manera útil para desbloquear la situación.Y es el uso creativo de paradojas, especialmente uno que se hizo por el Derecho, el que nos permite observar cómo su teoría (la de Luhmann) se ha comenzado a reciclar en las teorías existentes en Argentina. Temas como el problema de la paradojalidad del Derecho, de su ser sin fundamentos y sin comienzo, de la vacuidad de sus principios y la opacidad de sus operaciones y distinciones, se filtran teorías (como las de Carlos Cárcova o Ernesto Grün) y prácticas de la jurisprudencia y puede verse que ha comenzado a remover ese tipo de pensamiento que el profesor de Bielefeld había llamado “vétero europeo”Abstract:A theory can be an explanation of a piece of the world. A theory of law is intended to be an explanation of that phenomenon of social communication which we call Law. But, Raffaele De Giorgi, perhaps the person responsible for the introduction of luhmannian theory in Argentina, (jointly with Torres Nafarrate in Mexico in translating Luhmann’s work to Spanish), asked: What is a theory of society? What is the “Law of society”? And answered: Can we discuss this?, hands managed by hands, nothing different from a prostheses. According to De Giorgi we are sure that the themes that we use as objects or objects that we use as themes, are our construction, we think that we turn around ourselves, while we continue rotating around the vacuum. It is a paradox, or another paradox: ¿Is it possible to get out or get rid of these paradoxes? Logic does not help us. Logic, according to Luhmann, can only see to the fact that some expressions, with unavailable truths, are in contradiction with other expressions, the problem cannot be resolved us- ing logical operations. With the help of Gegenparadoxierungen (against-par- adox), systemic therapy is the alternative where the problem can be toler- ated. And, according to Luhmann, the placement of the paradox should be conducted in a more or less skilled, successful, or useful way to break the logjam.A creative use of paradoxes, especially legal ones, allows us to observe how Luhmann’s theory has impacted existing theories in ArgentinaThemes such as the paradoxality of law, or its being without foundation (and without beginning, the vacuity of their principles and the opacity of its distinctions and operations), filtered theories (like Carlos Cárcova or Ernesto Grün) and jurisprudential practices have started shifting things to what Bielefeld Professor has called “old European”\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2013\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El léxico sociopolítico en Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jiménez, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n , 39: 167–197. April 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{jimenez_lexico_2013,\n\ttitle = {El léxico sociopolítico en {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {39},\n\tissn = {0188-7742},\n\turl = {http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-77422013000100009},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Jiménez, Pedro},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {167--197},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n “New capitalism”, colonisation and the neo-philanthropic turn in social policy: Applying Luhmann's systems theory to the Big Society project.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jackson Rodger, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(11/12): 725–741. January 2013.\n Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"“NewPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{jackson_rodger_new_2013,\n\ttitle = {“{New} capitalism”, colonisation and the neo-philanthropic turn in social policy: {Applying} {Luhmann}'s systems theory to the {Big} {Society} project},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\tissn = {0144-333X},\n\tshorttitle = {“{New} capitalism”, colonisation and the neo-philanthropic turn in social policy},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-02-2013-0022},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/IJSSP-02-2013-0022},\n\tabstract = {Purpose Drawing on the functional structural systems theory of Niklas Luhmann and the theory of colonisation of the social lifeworld advanced by Jurgen Habermas, it is argued that the Big Society project in the UK is about the creation of an alternative non-state welfare infrastructure by the linking of wealthy donors with opportunities to engage in venture philanthropy in the third sector. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The paper outlines key features of Luhmann's theory relating to autopoiesis and structural coupling to illustrate its conceptual strength in making the colonisation process visible. Findings The paper illustrates the ways in which system imperatives underpinning the colonisation process absorb and subordinate public activism to narrow market principles forcing the third sector to communicate in the language of the market rather than caritas. Social implications The real implication of these developments for the character of the voluntary sector requires further critical examination not only because the state's enduring commitment to welfare may be in question but also for the growing significance of entrepreneurial philanthropy in shaping the character of volunteering and charitable activities and welfare relationships. Originality/value The paper applies Luhmann's theory relating to autopoiesis and structural coupling to make key features of government colonisation of the third sector visible.},\n\tnumber = {11/12},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy},\n\tauthor = {Jackson Rodger, John},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited},\n\tkeywords = {Big Society, Colonisation, Luhmann, Neo-philanthropy, Systems theory},\n\tpages = {725--741},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Purpose Drawing on the functional structural systems theory of Niklas Luhmann and the theory of colonisation of the social lifeworld advanced by Jurgen Habermas, it is argued that the Big Society project in the UK is about the creation of an alternative non-state welfare infrastructure by the linking of wealthy donors with opportunities to engage in venture philanthropy in the third sector. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The paper outlines key features of Luhmann's theory relating to autopoiesis and structural coupling to illustrate its conceptual strength in making the colonisation process visible. Findings The paper illustrates the ways in which system imperatives underpinning the colonisation process absorb and subordinate public activism to narrow market principles forcing the third sector to communicate in the language of the market rather than caritas. Social implications The real implication of these developments for the character of the voluntary sector requires further critical examination not only because the state's enduring commitment to welfare may be in question but also for the growing significance of entrepreneurial philanthropy in shaping the character of volunteering and charitable activities and welfare relationships. Originality/value The paper applies Luhmann's theory relating to autopoiesis and structural coupling to make key features of government colonisation of the third sector visible.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Doble contingencia y orden social desde la teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli-Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociológica (México), 28(78): 7–40. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DoblePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{pignuoli-ocampo_doble_2013,\n\ttitle = {Doble contingencia y orden social desde la teoría de sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {28},\n\tissn = {2007-8358},\n\turl = {http://www.sociologicamexico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/Sociologica/article/view/50},\n\tabstract = {Este trabajo reconstruye el concepto de doble contingencia de la teoría de sistemas sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Nuestro análisis se organiza en tres ejes. En el primero, estudiamos la conexión entre el problema de la doble contingencia y el problema del orden social, donde destaca la recepción crítica de Talcott Parsons y de la fenomenología. En el segundo, indagamos la tesis de la emergencia del orden social. Allí resalta la recepción del romanticismo alemán temprano y de la teoría de la emergencia. En el tercer eje dialogamos con la bibliografía secundaria fundamental para situar y dimensionar la reconstrucción alcanzada},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\tnumber = {78},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Sociológica (México)},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli-Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {7--40},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Este trabajo reconstruye el concepto de doble contingencia de la teoría de sistemas sociales de Niklas Luhmann. Nuestro análisis se organiza en tres ejes. En el primero, estudiamos la conexión entre el problema de la doble contingencia y el problema del orden social, donde destaca la recepción crítica de Talcott Parsons y de la fenomenología. En el segundo, indagamos la tesis de la emergencia del orden social. Allí resalta la recepción del romanticismo alemán temprano y de la teoría de la emergencia. En el tercer eje dialogamos con la bibliografía secundaria fundamental para situar y dimensionar la reconstrucción alcanzada\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2012\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El sistema de la estructura. Estructuralismo y teoría de sistemas sociales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cadenas, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (45). January 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{cadenas_sistema_2012,\n\ttitle = {El sistema de la estructura. {Estructuralismo} y teoría de sistemas sociales},\n\tissn = {0717-554X},\n\turl = {https://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/25896},\n\tabstract = {El presente artículo aborda las relaciones entre el pensamiento estructuralista, especialmente la variante antropológica de éste en Lévi-Strauss y la teoría de sistemas sociales de Luhmann. El análisis se hace a través de dos hipótesis que guían el desarrollo del texto. Se revisan los antecedentes históricos que relacionan al estructuralismo con la teoría de sistemas y se analizan los conceptos fundamentales que aparecen en esta relación. Posteriormente el pensamiento sistémico de Luhmann se contrasta a partir de algunos de sus conceptos centrales con la perspectiva estructuralista de Lévi-Strauss. El trabajo concluye con una revisión de las hipótesis presentadas y con reflexiones globales acerca de la perspectiva de los sistemas sociales.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {45},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Cadenas, Hugo},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2012},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El presente artículo aborda las relaciones entre el pensamiento estructuralista, especialmente la variante antropológica de éste en Lévi-Strauss y la teoría de sistemas sociales de Luhmann. El análisis se hace a través de dos hipótesis que guían el desarrollo del texto. Se revisan los antecedentes históricos que relacionan al estructuralismo con la teoría de sistemas y se analizan los conceptos fundamentales que aparecen en esta relación. Posteriormente el pensamiento sistémico de Luhmann se contrasta a partir de algunos de sus conceptos centrales con la perspectiva estructuralista de Lévi-Strauss. El trabajo concluye con una revisión de las hipótesis presentadas y con reflexiones globales acerca de la perspectiva de los sistemas sociales.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2011\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La aplicación de la teoría de sistemas de Luhmann a un proceso educativo con redes virtuales móviles.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fontes-Cabrera, A. L.; and Ayala-Rodríguez, R. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Complutense de Educación, 22(1): 129–144. August 2011.\n Number: 1\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{fontes-cabrera_aplicacion_2011,\n\ttitle = {La aplicación de la teoría de sistemas de {Luhmann} a un proceso educativo con redes virtuales móviles},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {1988-2793},\n\turl = {https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/36569},\n\tdoi = {10.5209/rev_RCED.2011.v22.n1.6},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tLa introducción de dispositivos tecnológicos en un sistema social cuyo propósito principal es la generación de conocimiento afecta la estructura de tal sistema social. Este artículo muestra cómo tal cambio estructural puede ser descrito mediante la teoría de sistemas de Luhmann (TSL). Es posible diferenciar los factores que proveen al sistema social de los medios requeridos para no solamente incorporar la entropía necesaria en sus comunicaciones sino también para disminuir el efecto de dicha ganancia entrópica a través de medidas de restructuración y redundancia. Esta descripción se fundamenta en un curso de enseñanza de habilidades comunicativas orales y escritas en lengua materna (Taller de Análisis y Expresión Verbal- TAEV), el cual fue impartido a 82 alumnos en el primer semestre de 2010 en el Tecnológico de Monterrey campus Ciudad de México. Este curso utiliza el celular BlackBerry Pearl como un recurso didáctico en un ambiente virtual móvil.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Revista Complutense de Educación},\n\tauthor = {Fontes-Cabrera, Ana Luisa and Ayala-Rodríguez, Rafael Andrés},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, aprendizaje móvil, comunicación, sistemas sociales, tecnología},\n\tpages = {129--144},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Resumen La introducción de dispositivos tecnológicos en un sistema social cuyo propósito principal es la generación de conocimiento afecta la estructura de tal sistema social. Este artículo muestra cómo tal cambio estructural puede ser descrito mediante la teoría de sistemas de Luhmann (TSL). Es posible diferenciar los factores que proveen al sistema social de los medios requeridos para no solamente incorporar la entropía necesaria en sus comunicaciones sino también para disminuir el efecto de dicha ganancia entrópica a través de medidas de restructuración y redundancia. Esta descripción se fundamenta en un curso de enseñanza de habilidades comunicativas orales y escritas en lengua materna (Taller de Análisis y Expresión Verbal- TAEV), el cual fue impartido a 82 alumnos en el primer semestre de 2010 en el Tecnológico de Monterrey campus Ciudad de México. Este curso utiliza el celular BlackBerry Pearl como un recurso didáctico en un ambiente virtual móvil.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La visión multidisciplinar de Luhmann sobre los Mass Media.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Martínez, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Razón y Palabra,9. 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{martinez_vision_2011,\n\ttitle = {La visión multidisciplinar de {Luhmann} sobre los {Mass} {Media}},\n\tissn = {1605-4806,},\n\tjournal = {Razón y Palabra},\n\tauthor = {Martínez, Ana},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tpages = {9},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Toward a Theory of Socio-Musical Systems: Reflections on Niklas Luhmann's Challenge to Music Sociology.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fuhrmann, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Acta Musicologica, 83(1): 135–159. 2011.\n Publisher: International Musicological Society\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TowardPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{fuhrmann_toward_2011,\n\ttitle = {Toward a {Theory} of {Socio}-{Musical} {Systems}: {Reflections} on {Niklas} {Luhmann}'s {Challenge} to {Music} {Sociology}},\n\tvolume = {83},\n\tissn = {0001-6241},\n\tshorttitle = {Toward a {Theory} of {Socio}-{Musical} {Systems}},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/stable/23075202},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Acta Musicologica},\n\tauthor = {Fuhrmann, Wolfgang},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {Publisher: International Musicological Society},\n\tpages = {135--159},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2010\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La teoría de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Urteaga, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 15. 2010.\n ZSCC: 0000179; https://web.archive.org/web/20220119092529/https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/contrastes/article/view/1341\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{urteaga_teorisistemas_2010,\n\ttitle = {La teoría de sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2016 Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía},\n\tissn = {2659-921X},\n\turl = {https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/contrastes/article/view/1341},\n\tdoi = {10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v15i0.1341},\n\tabstract = {ResumenSociólogo alemán profundamente original y difícilmente clasificable, Niklas Luhmann (1927- 1998) ha elaborado una teoría ambiciosa y coherente en la que describe la sociedad moderna como un sistema. Constituido, no tanto por individuos sino por comunicación, se diferencia en subsistemas funcionales cerrados a través de códigos especializados: los sistemas político, económico, religioso, artístico o jurídico. Inspirándose en autores, teorías y disciplinas muy diferentes, Niklas Luhmman ha construido una de las obras más fecundas y singulares del siglo XX. De manera más precisa, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar su teoría de los sistemas.Palabras claveLuhmann, teoría, sistema, subsistema, diferenciaciónAbstract The original and hardly classifiable German sociologist Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998) elaborated an ambitious and coherent theory which describes modern society as a system. Constituted, not so much of individuals but of communication, it is divided in closed functional subsystems through specializing codes: the political, economic, religious, artistic or juridical systems. Inspired by authors, theories and very different disciplines, Niklas Luhmman constructed one of the most fecund and singular works of the XX century. More precisely, the target of this article is to analyze his systems theory.KeywordsLuhmann, theory, system, subsystem, differentiation},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2022-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía},\n\tauthor = {Urteaga, Eguzki},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tnote = {ZSCC: 0000179; https://web.archive.org/web/20220119092529/https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/contrastes/article/view/1341},\n\tkeywords = {archived},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n ResumenSociólogo alemán profundamente original y difícilmente clasificable, Niklas Luhmann (1927- 1998) ha elaborado una teoría ambiciosa y coherente en la que describe la sociedad moderna como un sistema. Constituido, no tanto por individuos sino por comunicación, se diferencia en subsistemas funcionales cerrados a través de códigos especializados: los sistemas político, económico, religioso, artístico o jurídico. Inspirándose en autores, teorías y disciplinas muy diferentes, Niklas Luhmman ha construido una de las obras más fecundas y singulares del siglo XX. De manera más precisa, el objetivo de este artículo es analizar su teoría de los sistemas.Palabras claveLuhmann, teoría, sistema, subsistema, diferenciaciónAbstract The original and hardly classifiable German sociologist Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998) elaborated an ambitious and coherent theory which describes modern society as a system. Constituted, not so much of individuals but of communication, it is divided in closed functional subsystems through specializing codes: the political, economic, religious, artistic or juridical systems. Inspired by authors, theories and very different disciplines, Niklas Luhmman constructed one of the most fecund and singular works of the XX century. More precisely, the target of this article is to analyze his systems theory.KeywordsLuhmann, theory, system, subsystem, differentiation\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Niklas Luhmann y el orden social como máquina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rocabado, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Araucaria, 12(24). October 2010.\n Number: 24\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NiklasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{rocabado_niklas_2010,\n\ttitle = {Niklas {Luhmann} y el orden social como máquina},\n\tvolume = {12},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {2340-2199},\n\turl = {https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/view/1295},\n\tabstract = {Hoy día se hizo muy común reclamar por el orden y un sentido de previsibilidad\n\t\ten la vida cotidiana, la política y la cultura. A veces, todo parece\n\t\tperder significación y suena con fuerza un grito de temor al escuchar que la\n\t\tsociedad se embarranca en el desorden y el caos. Para los sociólogos, no hay\n\t\tnada por qué preocuparse, sobre todo cuando se revisan una vez más los aportes\n\t\tteóricos del sociólogo y filósofo alemán Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998). Las\n\t\tpreocupaciones teóricas de Luhmann en el ensayo ¿Cómo es posible el orden\n\t\tsocial? buscan delimitar las condiciones de “posibilidad de dicho orden”, constituyéndose\n\t\tasí en un conjunto de explicaciones que faciliten la delimitación de\n\t\taquellos problemas que fueron convirtiendo a la sociología en una disciplina\n\t\tcientífica, pero al mismo tiempo en un saber que reflexiona sobre el desenvolvimiento\n\t\tde los sistemas de la sociedad. Estas orientaciones siguen las huellas\n\t\tepistemológicas marcadas por Emanuel Kant en su Crítica de la Razón pura,\n\t\tdonde surge la pregunta en torno a cuáles son las condiciones de posibilidad\n\t\tdel conocimiento.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {24},\n\turldate = {2022-03-15},\n\tjournal = {Araucaria},\n\tauthor = {Rocabado, Franco},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tnote = {Number: 24},\n\tkeywords = {“multidisciplinar},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Hoy día se hizo muy común reclamar por el orden y un sentido de previsibilidad en la vida cotidiana, la política y la cultura. A veces, todo parece perder significación y suena con fuerza un grito de temor al escuchar que la sociedad se embarranca en el desorden y el caos. Para los sociólogos, no hay nada por qué preocuparse, sobre todo cuando se revisan una vez más los aportes teóricos del sociólogo y filósofo alemán Niklas Luhmann (1927-1998). Las preocupaciones teóricas de Luhmann en el ensayo ¿Cómo es posible el orden social? buscan delimitar las condiciones de “posibilidad de dicho orden”, constituyéndose así en un conjunto de explicaciones que faciliten la delimitación de aquellos problemas que fueron convirtiendo a la sociología en una disciplina científica, pero al mismo tiempo en un saber que reflexiona sobre el desenvolvimiento de los sistemas de la sociedad. Estas orientaciones siguen las huellas epistemológicas marcadas por Emanuel Kant en su Crítica de la Razón pura, donde surge la pregunta en torno a cuáles son las condiciones de posibilidad del conocimiento.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2008\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Luhmann y la complejidad: una introducción transdisciplinar.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Brandão, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (19): 99–110. January 2008.\n Number: 19\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LuhmannPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{brandao_luhmann_2008,\n\ttitle = {Luhmann y la complejidad: una introducción transdisciplinar},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\tshorttitle = {Luhmann y la {Complejidad}},\n\turl = {https://ultimadecada.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/13900},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/rmad.v0i19.13900},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {19},\n\turldate = {2022-03-15},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Brandão, Guilherme},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Number: 19},\n\tpages = {99--110},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2006\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La sociedad de la sociedad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Herder - Universidad Iberoamericana, México, 1a edición en español edition, 2006.\n Título en alemán: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Traducción: Javier Torres Nafarrate bajo el cuidado conceptual de Darío Rodríguez Mansilla, y estilístico de Marco Ornelas Esquinca y de Rafael Mesa Iturbide.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@book{luhmann_sociedad_2006,\n\taddress = {México},\n\tedition = {1a edición en español},\n\ttitle = {La sociedad de la sociedad},\n\tisbn = {968-5807-20-5},\n\turl = {https://circulosemiotico.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/la-sociedad-de-la-sociedad-niklas-luhmann.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Herder - Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {Título en alemán: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Traducción: Javier Torres Nafarrate bajo el cuidado conceptual de Darío Rodríguez Mansilla, y estilístico de Marco Ornelas Esquinca y de Rafael Mesa Iturbide.},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Glosario sobre la teoría social de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Corsi, G.; Esposito, E.; Baraldi, C.; Romero Pérez, M.; and Torres Nafarrete, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universidad Iberoamericana - ITESO - Anthropos, México, 2006.\n OCLC: 75506565\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"GlosarioHttps://www.google.com/url?sa\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@book{corsi_glosario_2006,\n\taddress = {México},\n\ttitle = {Glosario sobre la teoría social de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tisbn = {978-968-859-212-0},\n\tshorttitle = {Glosario sobre la teoría},\n\turl = {https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://ceducativa.weebly.com/uploads/1/5/0/9/15091428/glosario-sobre-teoria-social-de-luhmann.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiqvOTRvqr4AhWMlmoFHWIACscQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2wxLVhlGsCnb93SQe-mtLO},\n\tlanguage = {Spanish},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Iberoamericana - ITESO - Anthropos},\n\tauthor = {Corsi, Giancarlo and Esposito, Elena and Baraldi, Claudio and Romero Pérez, Miguel and Torres Nafarrete, Javier},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {OCLC: 75506565},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Luhmann explained: from souls to systems.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Moeller, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ideas explainedOpen Court, Chicago, 2006.\n OCLC: ocm68694011\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@book{moeller_luhmann_2006,\n\taddress = {Chicago},\n\tseries = {Ideas explained},\n\ttitle = {Luhmann explained: from souls to systems},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8126-9598-4},\n\tshorttitle = {Luhmann explained},\n\tabstract = {"An introduction to Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory. Discusses key concepts and relevant philosophical issues, and presents a case study. English-language translations of three of Luhmann's essays and bibliographies of works by and on Luhmann are included"--Provided by publisher},\n\tnumber = {v. 3},\n\tpublisher = {Open Court},\n\tauthor = {Moeller, Hans-Georg},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {OCLC: ocm68694011},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, Niklas, Mass media, Philosophy, Social aspects, Social systems},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"An introduction to Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory. Discusses key concepts and relevant philosophical issues, and presents a case study. English-language translations of three of Luhmann's essays and bibliographies of works by and on Luhmann are included\"–Provided by publisher\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems and Journalism Research.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Görke, A.; and Scholl, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journalism Studies, 7(4): 644–655. August 2006.\n Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600758066\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NiklasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{gorke_niklas_2006,\n\ttitle = {Niklas {Luhmann}'s {Theory} of {Social} {Systems} and {Journalism} {Research}},\n\tvolume = {7},\n\tissn = {1461-670X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600758066},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/14616700600758066},\n\tabstract = {“Why Systems?” asked the German sociologist Dirk Baecker in an article about Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems. To answer the question, it is necessary and important to pose the more fundamental question: why could a theory of society be useful in journalism research? Empirical studies typically do not engage a theory of society or use only implicit societal assumptions, although the role of journalism for and within society cannot be analysed without such a theory. Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems has proved controversial in discussions of German journalism research and consequently we believe it is important to introduce this sociologist and his sociological approach.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2021-06-28},\n\tjournal = {Journalism Studies},\n\tauthor = {Görke, Alexander and Scholl, Armin},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Routledge\n\\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600758066},\n\tpages = {644--655},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n “Why Systems?” asked the German sociologist Dirk Baecker in an article about Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems. To answer the question, it is necessary and important to pose the more fundamental question: why could a theory of society be useful in journalism research? Empirical studies typically do not engage a theory of society or use only implicit societal assumptions, although the role of journalism for and within society cannot be analysed without such a theory. Niklas Luhmann's theory of social systems has proved controversial in discussions of German journalism research and consequently we believe it is important to introduce this sociologist and his sociological approach.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2005\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n ¿Es posible una Teoría de la Sociedad para la observación de América Latina? Entrevista con Javier Torres Nafarrate sobre la propuesta teórica de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vallejos, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social, (2): 243–249. September 2005.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"¿EsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{vallejos_es_2005,\n\ttitle = {¿{Es} posible una {Teoría} de la {Sociedad} para la observación de {América} {Latina}? {Entrevista} con {Javier} {Torres} {Nafarrate} sobre la propuesta teórica de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2016 Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social},\n\tissn = {2594-1917},\n\tshorttitle = {¿{Es} posible una {Teoría} de la {Sociedad} para la observación de {América} {Latina}?},\n\turl = {https://andamios.uacm.edu.mx/index.php/andamios/article/view/501},\n\tdoi = {10.29092/uacm.v0i2.501},\n\tabstract = {No Aplica},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2023-03-16},\n\tjournal = {Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social},\n\tauthor = {Vallejos, Arturo},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tpages = {243--249},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n No Aplica\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2004\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El sistema social científico (una alternativa al relativismo epistémico). Notas sobre la sociología de la ciencia de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zanazzi, B. A\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia, volume 10, Argentina, 2004. \n Área Lógico-Epistemológica de la Escuela de Filosofía, Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional De Córdoba\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@inproceedings{zanazzi_sistema_2004,\n\taddress = {Argentina},\n\ttitle = {El sistema social científico (una alternativa al relativismo epistémico). {Notas} sobre la sociología de la ciencia de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\turl = {https://rdu.unc.edu.ar/handle/11086/3762},\n\tlanguage = {Es},\n\tbooktitle = {Epistemología e {Historia} de la {Ciencia}},\n\tauthor = {Zanazzi, Bonfilio A},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tnote = {Área Lógico-Epistemológica de la Escuela de Filosofía, Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional De Córdoba},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2003\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La presencia de Talcott Parsons en el trabajo teórico de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Oquendo, L. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Reflexión Política, 5(10). 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{oquendo_presencia_2003,\n\ttitle = {La presencia de {Talcott} {Parsons} en el trabajo teórico de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {5},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {2590-8669},\n\turl = {https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/699},\n\tnumber = {10},\n\turldate = {2022-02-14},\n\tjournal = {Reflexión Política},\n\tauthor = {Oquendo, Luis J.},\n\tyear = {2003},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1999\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Apuntes para un crítica ilustrada a Niklas Luhman.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n García-Sánchez, Á.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n ENDOXA, (11): 271–295. January 1999.\n No. 11\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ApuntesPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{garcia-sanchez_apuntes_1999,\n\ttitle = {Apuntes para un crítica ilustrada a {Niklas} {Luhman}},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2015 ENDOXA},\n\tissn = {2174-5676},\n\turl = {https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/endoxa/article/view/4935},\n\tdoi = {10.5944/endoxa.11.1999.4935},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\turldate = {2022-05-21},\n\tjournal = {ENDOXA},\n\tauthor = {García-Sánchez, Ángel},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {1999},\n\tnote = {No. 11},\n\tpages = {271--295},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1995\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La teoría de la sociedad de Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Varela, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociológica (México), 10. 1995.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{varela_teorisociedad_1995,\n\ttitle = {La teoría de la sociedad de {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\turl = {http://www.sociologicamexico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/Sociologica/article/view/686},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Sociológica (México)},\n\tauthor = {Varela, Gonzalo},\n\tyear = {1995},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1994\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El árbol del conocimiento. Las bases biológicas del entendimiento humano.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maturana, H.; and Varela, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Colección Fuera de SerieEditorial Universitaria Lumen, Santiago de Chile, 1994.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@book{maturana_arbol_1994,\n\taddress = {Santiago de Chile},\n\tseries = {Colección {Fuera} de {Serie}},\n\ttitle = {El árbol del conocimiento. {Las} bases biológicas del entendimiento humano},\n\tisbn = {978-956-11-1978-9},\n\turl = {https://cc-catalogo.org/publicaciones/el-%C3%A1rbol-del-conocimiento-las-bases-biol%C3%B3gicas-del-entendimiento-humano},\n\tlanguage = {Es},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial Universitaria Lumen},\n\tauthor = {Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco},\n\tyear = {1994},\n}\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1992\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n En el ocaso de la sociología crítica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociológica (México), 7(20). 1992.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"EnPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{luhmann_en_1992,\n\ttitle = {En el ocaso de la sociología crítica},\n\tvolume = {7},\n\turl = {http://www.sociologicamexico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/Sociologica/article/view/799},\n\tabstract = {Las siguientes reflexiones parten del  supuesto de que la sociología no necesariamente se verá  obligada  a  cambiar  sus  perspectivas  a  raíz  de  los  acontecimientos  reales  en  el colapso   de   los   sistemas   políticos   y   económicos   del   socialismo.   Los   conceptos constitutivos de la sociología no pueden ser afectados tan directamente.},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\tnumber = {20},\n\turldate = {2021-06-29},\n\tjournal = {Sociológica (México)},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tyear = {1992},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Las siguientes reflexiones parten del supuesto de que la sociología no necesariamente se verá obligada a cambiar sus perspectivas a raíz de los acontecimientos reales en el colapso de los sistemas políticos y económicos del socialismo. Los conceptos constitutivos de la sociología no pueden ser afectados tan directamente.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Entrevista a Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nafarrete, J. T.; and Padilla, G. Z.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México, 10(30): 789–807. September 1992.\n Number: 30\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"EntrevistaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@article{nafarrete_entrevista_1992,\n\ttitle = {Entrevista a {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2018 Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México},\n\tissn = {2448-6442},\n\turl = {https://estudiossociologicos.colmex.mx/index.php/es/article/view/949},\n\tdoi = {10.24201/es.1992v10n30.949},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {30},\n\turldate = {2023-06-18},\n\tjournal = {Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México},\n\tauthor = {Nafarrete, Javier Torres and Padilla, Guillermo Zermeño},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tnote = {Number: 30},\n\tkeywords = {Filosofía},\n\tpages = {789--807},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1990\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La sociedad sin hombres: Niklas Luhmann o la teoría como escándalo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Izuzquiza, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Editorial del Hombre Anthropos, Barcelona, 1990.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@book{izuzquiza_sociedad_1990,\n\taddress = {Barcelona},\n\ttitle = {La sociedad sin hombres: {Niklas} {Luhmann} o la teoría como escándalo},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial del Hombre Anthropos},\n\tauthor = {Izuzquiza, Ignacio},\n\tyear = {1990},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);