\n

\n \n 2023\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mining Argument Components in Essays at Different Levels.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Demaria, R.; Colla, D.; Delsanto, M.; Mensa, E.; Pasini, E.; and Radicioni, D. P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Basili, R.; Lembo, D.; Limongelli, C.; and Orlandini, A., editor(s), AIxIA 2023 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence, volume 14318, pages 137–150. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023.\n Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Mining$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{basili_mining_2023,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\ttitle = {Mining {Argument} {Components} in {Essays} at {Different} {Levels}},\n\tvolume = {14318},\n\tisbn = {978-3-031-47545-0 978-3-031-47546-7},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_10},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2024-01-11},\n\tbooktitle = {{AIxIA} 2023 – {Advances} in {Artificial} {Intelligence}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland},\n\tauthor = {Demaria, Roberto and Colla, Davide and Delsanto, Matteo and Mensa, Enrico and Pasini, Enrico and Radicioni, Daniele P.},\n\teditor = {Basili, Roberto and Lembo, Domenico and Limongelli, Carla and Orlandini, Andrea},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_10},\n\tnote = {Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science},\n\tpages = {137--150},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dynamica de Potentia et Legibus Naturae Corporeae Tentamen Scientiae Novae.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leibniz, G. W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Georg Olms Verlag, Baden-Baden, 1 edition, 2023.\n OCLC: 1402222432\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{leibniz_dynamica_2023,\n\taddress = {Baden-Baden},\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {Dynamica de {Potentia} et {Legibus} {Naturae} {Corporeae} {Tentamen} {Scientiae} {Novae}},\n\tisbn = {9783487164359 (I) 9783487164366 (II.1) 9783487164373 (II.2)},\n\tshorttitle = {Dynamica de {Potentia}},\n\tabstract = {Leibniz planned to publish his great treatise of the Dynamica, which he had worked out during his trip to Italy (1689-90). In the end, he refrained from publishing it, and the text was not published until 1860 by Gerhard. What is special about this critical edition is that it brings together all of Leibniz's autograph drafts, the intermediate copies, and the final copy intended for publication. Its aim is also to reconstruct Leibniz's complete edition plan by adding the supplements (miscellanea), articles in learned journals, and studies on various astronomical and natural philosophical topics that Leibniz intended to append to the main work. Two volumes in three tomes, LVI+588+XX+362+396 pp.},\n\tlanguage = {lat fra},\n\tpublisher = {Georg Olms Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm},\n\teditor = {Costa, Andrea and Fichant, Michel and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {OCLC: 1402222432},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Erasmo da Rotterdam e l’espressione dell’odio.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Alesse, F.; and Giovannetti, L., editor(s), Le metamorfosi dell’odio. Percorso interdisciplinare tra storia, filosofia, letteratura, pages 241–260. Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_erasmo_2023,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Erasmo da {Rotterdam} e l’espressione dell’odio},\n\tisbn = {9791259932693},\n\tabstract = {When it comes to hate, the age of Erasmus of Rotterdam does not miss a thing. In its seas of hatred, as we shall see, Erasmus swims unwillingly, albeit without being frightened: but he feels a lingering distaste for it, and his stances on the possible forms to be used and the limits to be respected in the expression of hatred are in any case rare (unlike his calls for concord and moderation). The essay presents a minimal review of these forms and offers some suggestions as to where the boundary is set, by Erasmus, between a legitimate and, if not tame, at least measured polemic, or a literarily and morally acceptable use of contumelia, and an open, dangerous and felonious expression of hatred.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Le metamorfosi dell’odio. {Percorso} interdisciplinare tra storia, filosofia, letteratura},\n\tpublisher = {Rosenberg \\& Sellier},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Alesse, Francesca and Giovannetti, Lorenzo},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {241--260},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz’s Dissatisfaction with the Cogito.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Nicolás, J. A.; Alejandro Herrera; Roberto Casales; Luis Velasco; Leonardo Ruiz; and Alfredo Martinez, editor(s), G.W. Leibniz: Razón, verdad y diálogo, of Colección Nova Leibniz / Latina, pages 35–48. Editorial Comares, Granada, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_leibnizs_2023,\n\taddress = {Granada},\n\tseries = {Colección {Nova} {Leibniz} / {Latina}},\n\ttitle = {Leibniz’s {Dissatisfaction} with the {Cogito}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-84-13-69533-4},\n\tabstract = {The so-called ‘Cogito’ – a philosophical device and a kind of self-experience – has been variously interpreted since Descartes’ own time with respect to both formal aspects and content, and with both Leibniz is apparently dissatisfied. We will consider the reasons for this dissatisfaction, Leibniz’s preferences as for possible reformulations and replacements (in particular his ‘multa-cogito principle’), as well as the role of these as regards Leibniz’s vision of the relationship between individuals and the world is concerned. We will conclude raising two questions, one concerning the I, the 'ego', and the other concerning the 'sum', inside the Leibnizian metaphysical setting.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\tbooktitle = {G.{W}. {Leibniz}: {Razón}, verdad y diálogo},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial Comares},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Nicolás, Juan Antonio and {Alejandro Herrera} and {Roberto Casales} and {Luis Velasco} and {Leonardo Ruiz} and {Alfredo Martinez}},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {35--48},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz nell’Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Noctua, 10(2-3): 251–270. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Leibniz$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_leibniz_2023,\n\ttitle = {Leibniz nell’{Archiv} für {Geschichte} der {Philosophie}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tissn = {2284-1180},\n\turl = {https://www.e-theca.net/Noctua/Issues/2023_X_2-3/Enrico%20Pasini%20%7C%20Leibniz%20nell%20Archiv%20fuer%20Geschichte%20der%20Philosophie.html},\n\tdoi = {10/j8pz},\n\tabstract = {The article presents the various phases in which one of the most eminent journals of the history of philosophy, the Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (1888–), dealt with Leibniz’s philosophy and his intellectual legacy. In particular, this study compares the main moments of historiographical interest and disinterest for this subject to the specific attitudes of the journal during the long 20th century.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {2-3},\n\tjournal = {Noctua},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {251--270},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2022\n \n \n (9)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Scavare nelle parole del passato e trovare parole per il presente.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Marras, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Filippetti, A., editor(s), Le scienze umane, sociali e del patrimonio culturale nell’era delle grandi transizioni, pages 87–101. CNR Edizioni, Roma, 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Scavare$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_scavare_2022,\n\taddress = {Roma},\n\ttitle = {Scavare nelle parole del passato e trovare parole per il presente},\n\tisbn = {978-88-8080-485-7},\n\turl = {https://www.cnr.it/sites/default/files/public/media/attivita/editoria/Relazione%20DSU%202022%20web-finale.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Le scienze umane, sociali e del patrimonio culturale nell’era delle grandi transizioni},\n\tpublisher = {CNR Edizioni},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico and Marras, Cristina},\n\teditor = {Filippetti, Andrea},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {87--101},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Facets of Hybridisation in the History of Ideas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; Garau, R.; and Pignatelli, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 11(22): 2:1–2:12. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Introduction:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_introduction_2022,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Facets} of {Hybridisation} in the {History} of {Ideas}},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tcopyright = {Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International},\n\turl = {https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/jihi/article/view/7334},\n\tdoi = {10/gr2hwr},\n\tabstract = {Conceptual hybridisation can be described as a transformative process in which certain existing concepts and ideas undergo a commixture, or are intermixed into other existing conceptual formations, so that existing notions are reshaped and gradually renewed, or an unexpected novelty is produced in the domain of documentable historical dynamics of ideas and concepts. This special issue on `Hybridisation in the History of Ideas' comprises five papers on dazzling historical cases spanning from the Renaissance to the 20th century, and covering European, Chinese, and American history of ideas, as well as their intertwining.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {22},\n\turldate = {2023-03-28},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico and Garau, Rodolfo and Pignatelli, Giuseppe},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {2:1--2:12},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Shuffling-Based Data Augmentation for Argument Mining.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Demaria, R.; Delsanto, M.; Colla, D.; Mensa, E.; Pasini, E.; and Radicioni, D. P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Confalonieri, R.; and Porello, D., editor(s), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Advances in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2022, volume 3354, of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Udine, Italy, November 2022. CEUR\n ISSN: 1613-0073\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Shuffling-Based$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{demaria_shuffling-based_2022,\n\taddress = {Udine, Italy},\n\tseries = {{CEUR} {Workshop} {Proceedings}},\n\ttitle = {Shuffling-{Based} {Data} {Augmentation} for {Argument} {Mining}},\n\tvolume = {3354},\n\turl = {https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3354/#paper6},\n\tabstract = {Argument Mining is an emerging research area in natural language processing; it is concerned with extracting arguments and their structure from text documents. Deep neural networks and contextualized word embeddings have been recently obtaining state-of-the-art results on various classification and relation extraction tasks including argument mining, but they tend to learn spurious correlations and to memorize high-frequency patterns possibly undermining systems’ predictions. In this paper we illustrate how transformers-based models fine-tuned on argumentative student essays are biased (and their performance are thereby affected) by their structure; additionally, we show that adopting data augmentation by shuffling sentences may be helpful in reducing structure dependency and to improve generalization.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2023-05-28},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th {Workshop} on {Advances} in {Argumentation} in {Artificial} {Intelligence} 2022},\n\tpublisher = {CEUR},\n\tauthor = {Demaria, Roberto and Delsanto, Matteo and Colla, Davide and Mensa, Enrico and Pasini, Enrico and Radicioni, Daniele P.},\n\teditor = {Confalonieri, Roberto and Porello, Daniele},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {ISSN: 1613-0073},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Riempire il vuoto: identità ed essenza dell’umano in Montaigne.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Paradigmi, (3): 369–386. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Riempire$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_riempire_2022,\n\ttitle = {Riempire il vuoto: identità ed essenza dell’umano in {Montaigne}},\n\tissn = {1120-3404},\n\tshorttitle = {Riempire il vuoto},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.30460/105746},\n\tdoi = {10/grh883},\n\tabstract = {Dealing with identity in Montaigne is at least as uncertain an undertaking as in his writings the idea itself is. Yet a work in which the author does nothing but write about himself, likely has to do with identity or, at least, with the claim of modern subjectivity to define, produce, assemble, and disassemble its own identity. The article briefly discusses well-known interpretations, more or less recent, of the uncertain identity that Montaigne seems to propose. The relationship between the question of identity and the human lack of “communication with Beingµ is then considered, proposing a reversal of the prima facie reading of the conclusion of the Apologie. Finally, a well-known passage in which Montaigne seems to propose a remedy for the essential emptiness of identity through friendship for self and living for the others is looked upon.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2022-12-22},\n\tjournal = {Paradigmi},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {369--386},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Superstitio: an Introduction to the Special Section.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Buccolini, C.; and Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas, (9): 3–10. 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Superstitio:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{buccolini_superstitio_2022,\n\ttitle = {Superstitio: an {Introduction} to the {Special} {Section}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tissn = {2283-7833, 2283-7833},\n\tshorttitle = {Superstitio},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.19283/lph-20219.742},\n\tdoi = {10/grm9gc},\n\tabstract = {Introduction to a special issue of the journal, that stems from a Call for Papers on “Superstitio from Ancient to Early Modern: Philosophy, Lexicography, and History of Ideas” that was presented in the previous issue of Lexicon Philosophicum (8, 2020). While historians have often studied ‘superstition’ tracing past practices of now sunken beliefs and systems of belief, we were especially interested in charting the intricate lexical and semantic field that originates from and surrounds ‘superstition’: the web of word usages, associations, and meanings, as well as of connected terms and concepts, that arose in the early modern reception of ancient debates and in the transformation, extensions, and innovations that modernity brought about in this domain.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {9},\n\turldate = {2023-01-15},\n\tjournal = {Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Buccolini, Claudio and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {3--10},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mathematik, Erfindung und experimentelle Kenntnis bei Johann Heinrich Lambert.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Nowitzki, H.; Pasini, E.; Rumore, P.; and Stiening, G., editor(s), Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777): Wege zur Mathematisierung der Aufklärung, pages 253–272. De Gruyter, Berlin, October 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Mathematik,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{nowitzki_mathematik_2022,\n\taddress = {Berlin},\n\ttitle = {Mathematik, {Erfindung} und experimentelle {Kenntnis} bei {Johann} {Heinrich} {Lambert}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-3-11-064776-1},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110647761-013/html},\n\tabstract = {What is Lambert's hallmark - his characteristic as, at least, a scientific theorist? What is his enterprise characterized by? And what kind of enterprise is it, after all? Is there a thinking, in the heavyweight philosophical-historical sense of the word? Or is it only a practical rather than theoretical attitude, which spontaneously rather than methodically colors all Lambert's fields of activity as his characterizing view? There is a point in time when Lambert made certain efforts to show the less immediately visible sides of his thinking. As is known, the project of an art of invention was the most important of Lambert's last years, a project that he did not bring to publication. Before the stage of the scientific process where logic and especially mathematics are able to offer sophisticated solutions to the most thorough methodological problems, an experimental natural history of invention is Lambert's last word.},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\turldate = {2022-10-27},\n\tbooktitle = {Johann {Heinrich} {Lambert} (1728–1777): {Wege} zur {Mathematisierung} der {Aufklärung}},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Nowitzki, Hans-Peter and Pasini, Enrico and Rumore, Paola and Stiening, Gideon},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/9783110647761-013},\n\tpages = {253--272},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777): Wege zur Mathematisierung der Aufklärung.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nowitzki, H.; Pasini, E.; Rumore, P.; and Stiening, G.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n De Gruyter, Berlin, October 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Johann$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{nowitzki_johann_2022,\n\taddress = {Berlin},\n\ttitle = {Johann {Heinrich} {Lambert} (1728–1777): {Wege} zur {Mathematisierung} der {Aufklärung}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-3-11-064776-1},\n\tshorttitle = {Johann {Heinrich} {Lambert} (1728–1777)},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110647761/html},\n\tabstract = {In his time, Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777) was considered one of Europe’s polymathic geniuses. His research encompassed mathematics, the philosophy of logic, metaphysics, epistemology, and linguistics, as well as astronomy and physics. Through his numerous publications, he not only exerted an influence on his fellow academics; as a popular philosopher, he also impacted public debate in the Enlightenment era. "Zur Einführung: Johann Heinrich Lambert und die Mathematisierung der Aufklärung", pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110647761-001},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\turldate = {2022-10-27},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\teditor = {Nowitzki, Hans-Peter and Pasini, Enrico and Rumore, Paola and Stiening, Gideon},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/9783110647761},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Gli indici della prima modernità come strumento storiografico: questioni preliminari metodologiche e pratiche.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Ciracì, F.; Miglietta, G.; and Gatto, C., editor(s), Culture digitali. Intersezioni: filosofia, arti, media. Preceedings della 11a conferenza nazionale AIUCD, Lecce, 2022, of Quaderni di Umanistica Digitale, pages 83–85, Bologna, 2022. AIUCD\n Medium: text Publisher: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Gli$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{ciraci_gli_2022,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\tseries = {Quaderni di {Umanistica} {Digitale}},\n\ttitle = {Gli indici della prima modernità come strumento storiografico: questioni preliminari metodologiche e pratiche},\n\tcopyright = {cc\\_by\\_4},\n\tisbn = {978-88-942535-6-6},\n\turl = {http://amsacta.unibo.it/6848},\n\tdoi = {10/gn8qnt},\n\tabstract = {The general purpose of this contribution is to thematize, starting from a set of methodological and practical issues, a possible line of investigation concerning the heuristics and the terminological heritage contained in the indices (indices rerum) of philosophical works (mainly of medium and large format) of the early modernity, whether they are great scholastic treatises or texts of natural philosophy, theoretical medicine (since at that time there was no philosophy of medicine, but there was a significant academic competition between philosophers and doctors): a field of research that could be extremely fruitful but which presents significant difficulties on both of the aforementioned levels. The focus of the contribution, which could join others of similar approach in a panel, is on indexes as dynamic access keys to content and as possible 'conceptual infrastructures' for interoperability.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\turldate = {2022-01-24},\n\tbooktitle = {Culture digitali. {Intersezioni}: filosofia, arti, media. {Preceedings} della 11a conferenza nazionale {AIUCD}, {Lecce}, 2022},\n\tpublisher = {AIUCD},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Ciracì, Fabio and Miglietta, Giulia and Gatto, Carola},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Medium: text\nPublisher: Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna},\n\tpages = {83--85},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Is Leibniz’s ‘Lex Iustitiae’ a Logical Law?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Ademollo, F.; Amerini, F.; and De Risi, V., editor(s), Thinking and Calculating: Essays in Logic, Its History and Its Philosophical Applications in Honour of Massimo Mugnai, volume 54, pages 323–339. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022.\n Series Title: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Is$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{ademollo_is_2022,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\ttitle = {Is {Leibniz}’s ‘{Lex} {Iustitiae}’ a {Logical} {Law}?},\n\tvolume = {54},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-3-030-97302-5 978-3-030-97303-2},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-97303-2_16},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2022-07-12},\n\tbooktitle = {Thinking and {Calculating}: {Essays} in {Logic}, {Its} {History} and {Its} {Philosophical} {Applications} in {Honour} of {Massimo} {Mugnai}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Ademollo, Francesco and Amerini, Fabrizio and De Risi, Vincenzo},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-030-97303-2_16},\n\tnote = {Series Title: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science},\n\tpages = {323--339},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2021\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Editorial.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lamarra, A.; and Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas, (8): 1–2. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Editorial$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{lamarra_editorial_2021,\n\ttitle = {Editorial},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tissn = {2283-7833},\n\turl = {https://lexicon.cnr.it/ojs/index.php/LP/article/view/694/540},\n\tdoi = {10/gqrmdx},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\turldate = {2022-09-05},\n\tjournal = {Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Lamarra, Antonio and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {1--2},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Double charnière. Philosophie naturelle, métaphysique et perception dans les PNG.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas, 0(8): 15–25. 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Double$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_double_2021,\n\ttitle = {Double charnière. {Philosophie} naturelle, métaphysique et perception dans les {PNG}},\n\tvolume = {0},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tissn = {2283-7833},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.19283/lph-20208.668},\n\tdoi = {10.19283/lph-20208.668},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\turldate = {2022-07-19},\n\tjournal = {Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {15--25},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n On some challenges posed by corpus-based research in the history of ideas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bonino, G.; Tripodi, P.; and Pasini, E., editor(s), DR2 Working Papers 1, of DR2 Working Papers, pages 9–17. Accademia University Press, Torino, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"On$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{bonino_challenges_2021,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\tseries = {{DR2} {Working} {Papers}},\n\ttitle = {On some challenges posed by corpus-based research in the history of ideas},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {9791280136800},\n\turl = {http://www.aaccademia.it/ita/scheda-libro?aaref=1512},\n\tabstract = {The paper briefly focuses on some peculiarities of corpus-based research when we move from linguistics to the history of ideas (and of concepts, doctrines and arguments). Building corpora for this kind of research poses specific challenges in terms of collection strategies, design decisions, and annotation.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tbooktitle = {{DR2} {Working} {Papers} 1},\n\tpublisher = {Accademia University Press},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Bonino, Guido and Tripodi, Paolo and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {9--17},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n DR2 Working Papers 1.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bonino, G.; Tripodi, P.; and Pasini, E.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of DR2 Working PapersAccademia University Press, Torino, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{bonino_dr2_2021,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\tseries = {{DR2} {Working} {Papers}},\n\ttitle = {{DR2} {Working} {Papers} 1},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {9791280136800},\n\tabstract = {Editors’ Foreword at p. 5-8. Incipit: With this small volume we inaugurate the series of Working Papers published by the DR2—the research group on “Distant Reading and Data-Driven Research in the History of Philosophy” that we founded in 2016 at the University of Turin. Contents:  On some challenges posed by corpus-based research in the history of ideas (Enrico Pasini); Comment on Enrico Pasini’s “On some challenges posed by corpus-based research in the history of ideas” (Arianna Betti); Exploring the influence and uses of Spinoza in the field of social sciences \n(Davide Berardini – Valeria Orsetta Cipolla – Sara Garzone – Andrea Moresco); Distant Foucault (Elena Bray – Gerardo Garruto – Jlenia Trivieri)},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tpublisher = {Accademia University Press},\n\teditor = {Bonino, Guido and Tripodi, Paolo and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2021},\n}\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2020\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Premature Death and Posthumous Celebrity of Counterfactual Gottfried Wilhelm Jungleibniz (1646-1676). Or, how the Philosophical Papers of the Greatest Mathematician of the 17th Century Were Long Afterwards Rediscovered.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Moreira, V. d. C.; and Nicolás, J. A., editor(s), Leibniz. Razón, principios y unidad. Razão, princípios e unidade, of Nova Leibniz / Latina, pages 107–117. Comares, Granada, 2020.\n OCLC: on1317705618\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{moreira_premature_2020,\n\taddress = {Granada},\n\tseries = {Nova {Leibniz} / {Latina}},\n\ttitle = {Premature {Death} and {Posthumous} {Celebrity} of {Counterfactual} {Gottfried} {Wilhelm} {Jungleibniz} (1646-1676). {Or}, how the {Philosophical} {Papers} of the {Greatest} {Mathematician} of the 17th {Century} {Were} {Long} {Afterwards} {Rediscovered}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-84-9045-982-9},\n\tabstract = {Through a parodistic, alternate-history presentation of the career of Leibniz until 1676, a restrained appreciation of scholarship concerned with Leibniz's youthful years is intimated. The text has been published in a somewhat unfinished form.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz. {Razón}, principios y unidad. {Razão}, princípios e unidade},\n\tpublisher = {Comares},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Moreira, Vivianne de Castilho and Nicolás, Juan Antonio},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tnote = {OCLC: on1317705618},\n\tkeywords = {Conference papers and proceedings, Congresses, Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm},\n\tpages = {107--117},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Sostanze, corpi e menti. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Paganini, G., editor(s), La filosofia dei moderni. Storia e temi, pages 67–87. Carocci, Roma, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_sostanze_2020,\n\taddress = {Roma},\n\ttitle = {Sostanze, corpi e menti. {Descartes}, {Spinoza}, {Leibniz}},\n\tisbn = {978-88-430-9953-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Sostanze, corpi e menti},\n\tabstract = {In early-modern times, the questions that we retrospectively associate with 'substance' involves a multifaceted philosophical problematic, in which the keywords 'substance' and 'thing' (res) cannot be separated from 'body', 'spirit', 'mind' and ‘soul’. They are encircled by a set of terms straddling between metaphysics and the doctrine of mind: body and essence, person and identity, reality and existence, and above all matter and thought, considered, as in the Platonic tradition, a fundamental opposition. This complex and unstable vocabulary is distributed over a family of problems pertaining to two main areas: what exists and what ensures the stability and effectiveness of this existence, on the one hand; on the other hand, the character of the sentient and thinking individual, and the corporeal or incorporeal nature of the subject of thought. Early-modern debates, starting from Descartes, imply a closer overlap between these two problems than in the classic conception of the Platonic and Aristotelian traditions. 1. Instabilità e riduzione 2. Descartes: due sostanze distinte e unite. 3. Malebranche: sostanze create e causalità occasionale. 4. Spinoza: sola sostanza è il tutto. 5. Leibniz: lo sfondamento dei limiti della sostanza. 6. Il declino della sostanza.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {La filosofia dei moderni. {Storia} e temi},\n\tpublisher = {Carocci},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Paganini, Gianni},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tpages = {67--87},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2019\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La biografia come campo di battaglia: le ‘vite’ dei filosofi della prima modernità.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Historia Philosophica, 17: 65–83. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_biografia_2019,\n\ttitle = {La biografia come campo di battaglia: le ‘vite’ dei filosofi della prima modernità},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tdoi = {10/gqm3b9},\n\tabstract = {Biography as a Battlefield: the ‘Lives’ of the Philosophers of Early Modernity. The paper deals with ‘historical’ biographies of Early-Modern philosophers, that have long been used to frame images of ‘good’, or ‘bad’ philosopher, around which fiery cultural battles could be fought. Writing biographies was a source of prestige, conveyed a programme, had a laudative purpose. These intents are transferred to the ‘lives’ of modern philosophers, who often arise as a commemoration. Battling on biographies begins in the confessional field, but with Pietro Ramo, we see the first important biographical ‘campaign’ around an Early-Modern professional philosopher. A second, more ambitious one concerns Descartes, who becomes a sort of model-philosopher, whereas the opposite happens with Pascal. That the life and death of philosophers become a battleground is apparent in the cases of Spinoza and Hume. In 18th-century Germany, instead, we find not only the most violent biographical wars but a progressive loosening of the moral connection between biography and doctrine as well, that testifies to a change in the philosophers’ social and cultural condition.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tjournal = {Historia Philosophica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {65--83},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La follia in Erasmo e in Faustino da Tredozio.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Giuliani, C., editor(s), Dalla Romagna all'Europa: l'umanesimo di Faustino da Tredozio, of Cultura umanistica e saperi moderni, pages 57–103. Pàtron, Bologna, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_follia_2019,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\tseries = {Cultura umanistica e saperi moderni},\n\ttitle = {La follia in {Erasmo} e in {Faustino} da {Tredozio}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-88-555-3458-1},\n\tabstract = {Per affrontare il problema del rapporto tra Faustino da Tredozio, e il più famoso Desiderio Erasmo, viene ricostruito il profilo di Faustino quale noto poeta volgare, legato alla cultura bolognese e fiorentina, che, dopo aver ottenuto un certo successo popolare, ambisce a farsi umanista e poeta latino, e le diverse reti culturali ed editoriali in cui è inserito, nonché, per quanto riguarda le opere apparse postume, il contesto culturale europeo di cui partecipano, in particolare riguardo al diffuso tema della follia. In Appendice il “Testamento novamente fatto per Messer Faustin Terdotio”.\nTo address the relationship between Faustino da Tredozio, and the more famous Erasmus of Rotterdam, we  trace here a profile of Faustino as a well-known vulgar poet, linked to the Bolognese and Florentine culture, who, after obtaining a certain popular success, aspires to become a humanist and a Latin poet. We also outline the various cultural and editorial networks in which he is inserted, as well as—as regards the works that appeared posthumously—the European cultural context in which they are produced, with special regard to the widespread theme of ‘madness‘ (follia). In the Appendix, the “Testament newly made by Messer Faustin Terdotio”.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {17},\n\tbooktitle = {Dalla {Romagna} all'{Europa}: l'umanesimo di {Faustino} da {Tredozio}},\n\tpublisher = {Pàtron},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Giuliani, Claudia},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {57--103},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mereologia della sostanza e mereologia del vivente in Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In D'Anna, G.; Massimilla, E.; Piro, F.; Sanna, M.; and Toto, F., editor(s), Morfologie del rapporto parti/tutto. Totalità e complessità nelle filosofie dell’età moderna, of Ricercare, pages 197–208. Mimesis Edizioni, Milano, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_mereologia_2019,\n\taddress = {Milano},\n\tseries = {Ricercare},\n\ttitle = {Mereologia della sostanza e mereologia del vivente in {Leibniz}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-88-575-6002-1},\n\tabstract = {Any study of Leibniz's mereology, i.e. his doctrine of the relationship between parts and wholes, involves at best engaging with concepts of strong polysemicity; in the end, such an inquiry could even be misleading. A mereological approach may require, in relation to Leibniz's thought, to consider very different objects, to which tools apply that are also significantly different.\nThis paper will therefore deal with the question of Leibnizian mereology from a limited point of view: that of the different orders of composition and of the different relationships whole / parts that are found in Leibniz's thought, or that do not occur in it, and of the possible correspondence between them. The starting point will be his ideas on the composition of substances, from which different orders of parts and wholes ensue. This may be of help in solving certain problems that concern substances and substantiated entities, but mereological problems concerning the parts of living beings cannot be solved in this way.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {17},\n\tbooktitle = {Morfologie del rapporto parti/tutto. {Totalità} e complessità nelle filosofie dell’età moderna},\n\tpublisher = {Mimesis Edizioni},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {D'Anna, Giuseppe and Massimilla, Edoardo and Piro, Francesco and Sanna, Manuela and Toto, Francesco},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {197--208},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n I filosofi moderni scrivono di sé.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Historia Philosophica, 17: 85–100. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_i_2019,\n\ttitle = {I filosofi moderni scrivono di sé},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tdoi = {10.19272/201900501005},\n\tabstract = {The Modern Philosophers Write about Themselves. Biographies and autobiographies are suspect—all the more philosophical autobiographies, given the perpetually ambiguous status of philosophy. This paper considers above all early modern philosophical autobiography, focusing not on factual reliability but on the function(s) of these writings. This involves asking yourself whether there is a philosopher’s own way, or a possible philosophical purpose, in writing an autobiography. Philosophical autobiographisms are tracked starting with the 14th-15th century, with particular attention to autobiography as a philosophical display of life (Montaigne, Rousseau), as well as to the replacement of prefatory biographies with autobiography as a means to legitimization of philosophical works and doctrines (Campanella, Descartes), and to the supra-philosophical and genuinely epochal function attributed to philosophical autobiography, from Descartes to Nietzsche, as the ultimate secret of modern philosophical autobiography.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tjournal = {Historia Philosophica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {85--100},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Blandior orthodoxia, ou: Existe-t-il un leibnizianisme orthodoxe au XVIIIe siècle?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Filosofický časopis, 67(Hors-Série: Leibniz et leibnizianismes): 93–104. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_blandior_2019,\n\ttitle = {Blandior orthodoxia, ou: {Existe}-t-il un leibnizianisme orthodoxe au {XVIIIe} siècle?},\n\tvolume = {67},\n\tissn = {0015-1831},\n\tabstract = {This paper aims at posing the question whether one or more “orthodox” Leibnizianisms can be instantiated in the century that followed the German philosopher’s death. A distinction is proposed between orthodoxy as the strictly correct doctrine, which intends to be “faithful,” and a weaker and blander orthodoxy, blandior orthodoxia, which, so to speak, intends to be “respectful.” The meaning of the term “Leibnizianism” in the 18th century, as well as different categories of possible “disciples,” are analyzed. The question can be distributed onto different axes, such as geographic distribution, generations (e.g., those who had personally known Leibniz), which themes may characterize a “Leibnizian” position, and so on. Some isolated examples of various forms of such blander orthodoxy are finally discussed.\n/\nLa contribution se propose de poser la question de l’existence d’un ou de plusieurs leibnizianismes « orthodoxes » dans le siècle qui suit la mort du philosophe allemand. Une distinction est proposée entre orthodoxie comme doctrine strictement correcte, qui se propose d’être fidèle, et une orthodoxie plus faible et légère, blandior orthodoxia, qui, pour ainsi dire, se propose d’être « respectueuse ». La signification du terme « leibnizianisme » au XVIIIe siècle et différentes catégories de possibles « disciples » sont analysées. La question peut se décliner en différents axes, comme la répartition géographique, les générations (par exemple, ceux qui avaient connu personnellement Leibniz), les thèmes qui pourraient caractériser une position « leibnizienne » etc. Quelques exemples isolés de diverses formes de faible orthodoxie sont finalement discutés.},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {Hors-Série: Leibniz et leibnizianismes},\n\tjournal = {Filosofický časopis},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Makovský, Jan},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {93--104},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n On the Lability of Natural Entities, at the Example of Raspe’s ‘De novis e mari natis insulis’.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 8(15): 3:1–3:18. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_lability_2019,\n\ttitle = {On the {Lability} of {Natural} {Entities}, at the {Example} of {Raspe}’s ‘{De} novis e mari natis insulis’},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tissn = {2280-8574},\n\tdoi = {10.13135/2280-8574/4046},\n\tabstract = {Early-Modern natural philosophy—when, in the inception phase of geology, or the history of the earth, philosophy, theology, natural science and biblical history were still intertwined—can provide us with some examples of an early understanding of the possible extreme lability of apparently rock-solid natural entities. The example that we shall concentrate upon here is Rudolph Erich Raspe, a German geologist and professor of antiquities. To Raspe's way of thinking, the fact that new islands still appeared in the 18th century was proof that, in his present time just as in the past, the Earth was subject to impressive movements and commotions: and so, in an impressive way, even lifeless natural entities could raise, disappear, be born and mutate.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {15},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {3:1--3:18},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Semantically Aware Text Categorisation for Metadata Annotation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Carducci, G.; Leontino, M.; Radicioni, D. P.; Bonino, G.; Pasini, E.; and Tripodi, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Manghi, P.; Candela, L.; and Gianmaria Silvello, editor(s), Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science. IRCDL 2019, of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pages 315–330. Springer Nature, Cham, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Semantically$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{manghi_semantically_2019,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\tseries = {Communications in {Computer} and {Information} {Science}},\n\ttitle = {Semantically {Aware} {Text} {Categorisation} for {Metadata} {Annotation}},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-3-030-11225-7},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4_25},\n\tabstract = {In this paper we illustrate a system aimed at solving a long-standing and challenging problem: acquiring a classifier to automatically annotate bibliographic records by starting from a huge set of unbalanced and unlabelled data. We illustrate the main features of the dataset, the learning algorithm adopted, and how it was used to discriminate philosophical documents from documents of other disciplines. One strength of our approach lies in the novel combination of a standard learning approach with a semantic one: the results of the acquired classifier are improved by accessing a semantic network containing conceptual information. We illustrate the experimentation by describing the construction rationale of training and test set, we report and discuss the obtained results and conclude by drawing future work.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {988},\n\turldate = {2019-05-06},\n\tbooktitle = {Digital {Libraries}: {Supporting} {Open} {Science}. {IRCDL} 2019},\n\tpublisher = {Springer Nature},\n\tauthor = {Carducci, Giulio and Leontino, Marco and Radicioni, Daniele P. and Bonino, Guido and Pasini, Enrico and Tripodi, Paolo},\n\teditor = {Manghi, Paolo and Candela, Leonardo and {Gianmaria Silvello}},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4_25},\n\tpages = {315--330},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n L’édition critique de la Dynamica de potentia seu de legibus naturæ corporeæ de G. W. Leibniz.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Costa, A.; and Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue d'histoire des sciences, 72(1): 137–161. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"L’édition$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{costa_ledition_2019,\n\ttitle = {L’édition critique de la {Dynamica} de potentia seu de legibus naturæ corporeæ de {G}. {W}. {Leibniz}},\n\tvolume = {72},\n\tissn = {0151-4105},\n\turl = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-des-sciences-2019-1-page-137.htm},\n\tdoi = {10.3917/rhs.721.0137},\n\tabstract = {Les spécificités de l’édition des textes mathématiques et physiques sont souvent contournées par l’ecdotique. Dans le cas de cette étrange famille d’ouvrages, la recherche des critères à adopter pour la sélection des témoignages, la collation des textes et l’établissement des appareils critiques, la détermination du rapport entre verba et picturæ, ne dépassent pas le stade d’un bricolage savant. De surcroît, la Dynamica de potentia seu de legibus naturæ corporeæ de Leibniz détient un des records en matière de nombre d’échecs de tentatives de publication. On analysera les principaux problèmes posés par l’édition de ce corpus, véritable cas d’école puisqu’il présente toute la palette des difficultés auxquelles l’éditeur contemporain d’une œuvre scientifique du xviie siècle doit faire face. À partir d’une remise en question – un peu radicale – de l’utilité de l’étude du premier brouillon de la Dynamica, on parviendra finalement à montrer que seule la prise en compte synoptique des trois états du texte de la Dynamica de potentia peut nous dévoiler la véritable nature et le dessein global du projet leibnizien d’une architecture textuelle à même d’intégrer progressivement la totalité des sciences physiques, sur le mode encyclopédique.},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2019-06-21},\n\tjournal = {Revue d'histoire des sciences},\n\tauthor = {Costa, Andrea and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpages = {137--161},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2018\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Contrefactuels dans le droit? Hypothèses et mondes possibles.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Dix-septième siècle, 70(2): 263–274. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Contrefactuels$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_contrefactuels_2018,\n\ttitle = {Contrefactuels dans le droit? {Hypothèses} et mondes possibles},\n\tvolume = {70},\n\tissn = {0012-4273},\n\turl = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-dix-septieme-siecle-2018-2-page-263.htm},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.3917/dss.182.0263},\n\tabstract = {This paper starts from the connection between hypothetical reasoning and juridical reasoning in Leibniz’s writings from the period of his youth. Hypothetical conditionals in Leibniz’s mature logic of possible worlds, and some elements of divergence and convergence between these different steps in the development of Leibniz’s logic, will be then considered. Some difficult aspects in Leibniz’s theory of counterfactuals will be analyzed in comparison to some elements of David Lewis’ possible worlds logic. In conclusion, it will be suggested that, in certain aspects of Leibniz’s mature logic of counterfactuals, some basic features of his juridical approach are preserved. \n/\nLe point de départ de cette contribution est la connexion entre raisonnement hypothétique et droit dans les textes de jeunesse de Leibniz. On aborde ensuite la question des conditionnels hypothétiques dans la logique plus tardive des mondes possibles, ce qui soulève la question de la divergence et de la possible convergence entre ces différentes étapes de la pensée logique leibnizienne. Faire des hypothèses sur les mondes possibles comprend – ou consiste à faire – des raisonnements contrefactuels, ce qui soulève des questions complexes qui sont envisagées en comparant la doctrine leibnizienne des mondes possibles avec certains points de celle de David Lewis. Cette analyse permettra de suggérer, finalement, que la logique juridique du jeune Leibniz trouve dans la logique des mondes possibles, non pas une conception antagoniste, mais son développement.},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Dix-septième siècle},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {263--274},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Scienze della natura e storia della terra.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Mori, M., editor(s), Leibniz e la cultura enciclopedica, pages 149–169. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_scienze_2018,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\ttitle = {Scienze della natura e storia della terra},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz e la cultura enciclopedica},\n\tpublisher = {Il Mulino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Mori, Massimo},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {149--169},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Erasmo e la soavità della vita.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Rumore, P., editor(s), Momenti di Felicità. Per Massimo Mori, pages 21–32. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_erasmo_2018,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\ttitle = {Erasmo e la soavità della vita},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Momenti di {Felicità}. {Per} {Massimo} {Mori}},\n\tpublisher = {Il Mulino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Rumore, Paola},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {21--32},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2017\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Guest-edited section: Constructionisme et naturalisme dans la pensée de Leibniz/Constructionism and Naturalism in Leibniz’s Thought.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.,\n editor.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue roumaine de philosophie, 61(1): 3–63. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_guest-edited_2017,\n\ttitle = {Guest-edited section: {Constructionisme} et naturalisme dans la pensée de {Leibniz}/{Constructionism} and {Naturalism} in {Leibniz}’s {Thought}},\n\tvolume = {61},\n\tlanguage = {eng fra},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Revue roumaine de philosophie},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {3--63},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Constructionism and Naturalism in Leibniz’s Thought.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revue roumaine de philosophie, 61(1): 5–15. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_constructionism_2017,\n\ttitle = {Constructionism and {Naturalism} in {Leibniz}’s {Thought}},\n\tvolume = {61},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Revue roumaine de philosophie},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {5--15},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Concept of “Composite Substance” and other Absences in the Monadology.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Li, W., editor(s), 300 Jahre Monadologie, of Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, pages 27–34. Steiner, Stuttgart, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_concept_2017,\n\taddress = {Stuttgart},\n\tseries = {Studia {Leibnitiana} {Supplementa}},\n\ttitle = {The {Concept} of “{Composite} {Substance}” and other {Absences} in the {Monadology}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {39},\n\tbooktitle = {300 {Jahre} {Monadologie}},\n\tpublisher = {Steiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Li, Wenchao},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {27--34},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2016\n \n \n (9)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Vorwort.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Leibniz e la botanica, pages 7–8. Peter Lang, Bern, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_vorwort_2016,\n\taddress = {Bern},\n\ttitle = {Vorwort},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz e la botanica},\n\tpublisher = {Peter Lang},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tcollaborator = {Botticelli, Luca},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {7--8},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Foreword to the special issue: Another 18th-Century German Philosophy? Rethinking German Enlightenment.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Rumore, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quaestio, 16: vii–ix. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Foreword$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_foreword_2016,\n\ttitle = {Foreword to the special issue: {Another} 18th-{Century} {German} {Philosophy}? {Rethinking} {German} {Enlightenment}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tissn = {1379-2547},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24763/},\n\tdoi = {10.5555/J.QUAESTIO.4.00001},\n\tabstract = {The foreword introduces the scope of this special issue, that is, a re-interpretation of the development of 18th-century German philosophy. We aim in particular at identifying naturalistic and ‘scientific’ tendencies, which evolved alongside the well-studied mainstream currents. In our view, this long-overshadowed manifold phenomenon had two major traits. First, it involved a more intense dialogue between philosophical thought, mathematics, science and medicine. Second, it was pervaded, despite the different positions of its major and minor protagonists, by a shared fundamental naturalistic position in metaphysics and epistemology.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tjournal = {Quaestio},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico and Rumore, Paola},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {vii--ix},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Alles begann mit Tschirnhaus.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quaestio, 16: 27–45. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Alles$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_alles_2016,\n\ttitle = {Alles begann mit {Tschirnhaus}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tissn = {1379-2547},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24711/},\n\tdoi = {10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.112334},\n\tabstract = {Did it all begin with Tschirnhaus? This paper discusses the exemplary role that Tschirnhaus could play in the reconstruction of an empirically oriented, scientific, somewhat radical and variously unorthodox current in 18th-century German philosophy, starting from 18th-century characterizations of his intellectual image.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tjournal = {Quaestio},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {27--45},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Media brevitas? Ragionando di forma breve nella filosofia moderna.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Borgogni, D.; Caprettini, G. P.; and Vaglio Marengo, C., editor(s), Forma breve, pages 3–17. Accademia University Press, Torino, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_media_2016,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Media brevitas? {Ragionando} di forma breve nella filosofia moderna},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Forma breve},\n\tpublisher = {Accademia University Press},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Borgogni, Daniele and Caprettini, Gian Paolo and Vaglio Marengo, Carla},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {3--17},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n G.W. Leibniz’s Anti-Death Perspective: Spontaneity of Death and Absolute Immortality.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Tandy, C., editor(s), Four Decades after Michael Polanyi, Three Centuries after G. W. Leibniz, of Death and Anti-Death, pages 169–185. Ria University Press, Taiwan, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_gw_2016,\n\taddress = {Taiwan},\n\tseries = {Death and {Anti}-{Death}},\n\ttitle = {G.{W}. {Leibniz}’s {Anti}-{Death} {Perspective}: {Spontaneity} of {Death} and {Absolute} {Immortality}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {14},\n\tbooktitle = {Four {Decades} after {Michael} {Polanyi}, {Three} {Centuries} after {G}. {W}. {Leibniz}},\n\tpublisher = {Ria University Press},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Tandy, Charles},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {169--185},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz and minutiae.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Li, W., editor(s), “Für unser Glück oder das Glück anderer”. Vorträge des X. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, volume 6, pages 697–706, Hildesheim, 2016. Olms\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{pasini_leibniz_2016,\n\taddress = {Hildesheim},\n\ttitle = {Leibniz and minutiae},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {“{Für} unser {Glück} oder das {Glück} anderer”. {Vorträge} des {X}. {Internationalen} {Leibniz}-{Kongresses}},\n\tpublisher = {Olms},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Li, Wenchao},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {697--706},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz’s Concept of Unity and Its Aristotelian Origins.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Nicolás, J. A.; and Öffenberger, N., editor(s), Beiträge zu Leibniz’ Rezeption der Aristotelischen Logik und Metaphysik, pages 325–332. Olms, Hildesheim, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_leibnizs_2016,\n\taddress = {Hildesheim},\n\ttitle = {Leibniz’s {Concept} of {Unity} and {Its} {Aristotelian} {Origins}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {Beiträge zu {Leibniz}’ {Rezeption} der {Aristotelischen} {Logik} und {Metaphysik}},\n\tpublisher = {Olms},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Nicolás, Juan Antonio and Öffenberger, Niels},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {325--332},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mathematical Similes in Leibniz’s Theodicy.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Favaretti Camposampiero, M.; Geretto, M.; and Perissinotto, L., editor(s), Theodicy and Reason. Logic, Metaphysics, and Theology in Leibniz’s Essais de Théodicée (1710), pages 63–84. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, Venezia, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_mathematical_2016,\n\taddress = {Venezia},\n\ttitle = {Mathematical {Similes} in {Leibniz}’s {Theodicy}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {Theodicy and {Reason}. {Logic}, {Metaphysics}, and {Theology} in {Leibniz}’s {Essais} de {Théodicée} (1710)},\n\tpublisher = {Edizioni Ca’ Foscari},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Favaretti Camposampiero, Matteo and Geretto, Mattia and Perissinotto, Luigi},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {63--84},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Special issue: Another 18th-Century German Philosophy? Rethinking German Enlightenment.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Rumore, P.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quaestio, 16: i–x, 1–190. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_special_2016,\n\ttitle = {Special issue: {Another} 18th-{Century} {German} {Philosophy}? {Rethinking} {German} {Enlightenment}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tjournal = {Quaestio},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Rumore, Paola},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {i--x, 1--190},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2015\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Les vertus du scepticisme selon Bayle et Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Rateau, P.; Solère, J.; and Leduc, C., editor(s), Leibniz et Bayle: confrontation et dialogue, of Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte, pages 87–107. Steiner, Stuttgart, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_vertus_2015,\n\taddress = {Stuttgart},\n\tseries = {Studia {Leibnitiana} {Sonderhefte}},\n\ttitle = {Les vertus du scepticisme selon {Bayle} et {Leibniz}},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {43},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz et {Bayle}: confrontation et dialogue},\n\tpublisher = {Steiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Rateau, Paul and Solère, Jean-Luc and Leduc, Christian},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {87--107},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Parte vivente e parte morta.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Giornale della Accademia di Medicina di Torino, 178(Atti del Convegno “Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno. La moderna ambiguità della morte”, Torino, Accademia di Medicina, 8-9 aprile 2015): 360–376. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_parte_2015,\n\ttitle = {Parte vivente e parte morta},\n\tvolume = {178},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {Atti del Convegno “Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno. La moderna ambiguità della morte”, Torino, Accademia di Medicina, 8-9 aprile 2015},\n\tjournal = {Giornale della Accademia di Medicina di Torino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Buzzi, Serena and Randone, Lucia},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {360--376},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Norberto Bobbio, la guerra giusta e il dissenso amico nel primo conflitto del Golfo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n L’Indice dei libri del mese, 32(12): 11. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_norberto_2015,\n\ttitle = {Norberto {Bobbio}, la guerra giusta e il dissenso amico nel primo conflitto del {Golfo}},\n\tvolume = {32},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {12},\n\tjournal = {L’Indice dei libri del mese},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {11},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Essential Differences. Or, an Exercise in Symptomatic History of Philosophy.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Niţa, A., editor(s), Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms: Between Continuity and Transformation, of The New Synthese Historical Library, pages 59–72. Springer Switzerland, Cham, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_essential_2015,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\tseries = {The {New} {Synthese} {Historical} {Library}},\n\ttitle = {Essential {Differences}. {Or}, an {Exercise} in {Symptomatic} {History} of {Philosophy}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {74},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz’s {Metaphysics} and {Adoption} of {Substantial} {Forms}: {Between} {Continuity} and {Transformation}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer Switzerland},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Niţa, Adrian},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {59--72},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction to the special issue on “Gastronomy and Revolution”.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Albertone, M.; Frobert, L.; and Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 4(8): 1:1–1:8. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{albertone_introduction_2015,\n\ttitle = {Introduction to the special issue on “{Gastronomy} and {Revolution}”},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tissn = {2280-8574},\n\tdoi = {10.13135/2280-8574/1621},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Albertone, Manuela and Frobert, Ludovic and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {1:1--1:8},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2014\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz tras los pasos de Spinoza.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Cabañas, L.; and Esquisabel, O. M., editor(s), Leibniz frente a Spinoza. Una interpretación panorámica, pages 71–95. Editorial Comares, Granada, 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_leibniz_2014,\n\taddress = {Granada},\n\ttitle = {Leibniz tras los pasos de {Spinoza}},\n\tabstract = {The paper (an ample reworking of a 2005 Italian paper) tries to evaluate Leibniz's enduring fascination with Spinoza and presents an overview in five stages of the development of his complex relationship to his thought, beginning with the time of Mainz, when Leibniz shows a strange urgency to get in epistolary contact with the author of the Theologico-Political Treatise, despite his public rejection of both the work and the author; then Leibniz's stay in Paris, especially in the year 1675, when he seeks information through Tschirnhaus on Spinoza's clandestine doctrines; their personal meeting in the Hague, towards the end of the year 1676, and the subsequent distancing of Leibniz from Spinozism; the reading by Leibniz of Spinoza's Opera Posthuma and the extension of his arguments against Spinozism to discredit Cartesian philosophy in general, and, finally, Leibniz's retrospective evaluation of Spinoza's thought in the Theodicy.},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz frente a {Spinoza}. {Una} interpretación panorámica},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial Comares},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Cabañas, Leticia and Esquisabel, Oscar M.},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tkeywords = {Spinoza},\n\tpages = {71--95},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno. Introduzione.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Giornale della Accademia di Medicina di Torino, 177(Atti del Convegno “Conoscenza e cura. Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno” (Torino, Accademia di Medicina, 12-13 marzo 2014)): 323–336. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_filosofia_2014,\n\ttitle = {Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno. {Introduzione}},\n\tvolume = {177},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {Atti del Convegno “Conoscenza e cura. Filosofia e medicina nel pensiero moderno” (Torino, Accademia di Medicina, 12-13 marzo 2014)},\n\tjournal = {Giornale della Accademia di Medicina di Torino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Gino, Sebastiano and Randone, Lucia},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tpages = {323--336},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Special issue: Erasmian Science.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Omodeo, P. D.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 3(6). 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_special_2014,\n\ttitle = {Special issue: {Erasmian} {Science}},\n\tvolume = {3},\n\tissn = {2280-8574},\n\tdoi = {10.13135/2280-8574/842},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Omodeo, Pietro Daniel},\n\tyear = {2014},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Special issue: Interdisciplinary History of Ideas.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Albertone, M.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n History of European Ideas, 40(4): 451–560. 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_special_2014-1,\n\ttitle = {Special issue: {Interdisciplinary} {History} of {Ideas}},\n\tvolume = {40},\n\tissn = {0191-6599, 1873-541X},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {History of European Ideas},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Albertone, Manuela},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tpages = {451--560},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2013\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Quae sunt Caesaris: l'oscillante rapporto di religione e politica in Erasmo da Rotterdam.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Centi, B.; and Siclari, A., editor(s), Religione e politica. Da Dante alle prospettive teoriche contemporanee, pages 85–108. Edizioni di storia e letteratura, Roma, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_quae_2013,\n\taddress = {Roma},\n\ttitle = {Quae sunt {Caesaris}: l'oscillante rapporto di religione e politica in {Erasmo} da {Rotterdam}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Religione e politica. {Da} {Dante} alle prospettive teoriche contemporanee},\n\tpublisher = {Edizioni di storia e letteratura},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Centi, Beatrice and Siclari, Alberto},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Erasmus of Rotterdam, Religion and Politics},\n\tpages = {85--108},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Teleologia in Leibniz e Husserl. Brevi note a partire da un inedito leibniziano.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Discipline Filosofiche, 23(2): 21–36. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_teleologia_2013,\n\ttitle = {Teleologia in {Leibniz} e {Husserl}. {Brevi} note a partire da un inedito leibniziano},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tabstract = {This paper takes its start from the unpublished Leibnizian manuscript of which a critical edition and an Italian translation are presented by the Author in the same issue of “Discipline filosofiche” – in particular from some passages concerning what we might roughly call teleological projections. A parallel analysis of Leibniz's and Husserl's attitudes to the attribution of teleological properties, at various levels of complexity, factuality, ideality, to the natural world and to human history, shows in Husserl's teleology a mix of ingredients very similar to those of Leibniz's own one – ingredients that Husserl always relished – but with quite different results. On the one hand, for Husserl the universal order is teleologically realised in humanity, albeit with a reference to transcendence that has never been made by him completely clear. On the other hand, perhaps thanks to being unaware of Kant's future contributions to the field, Leibniz seems more capable to avoid certain naïver forms of teleological attribution to which Husserl might seem more prone.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Discipline Filosofiche},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Husserl, Teleology, Transcendence, Universal order},\n\tpages = {21--36},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ex oppositis quid. Cusano, Erasmo, Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Dall'Igna, A.; and Roberi, D., editor(s), Cusano e Leibniz. Prospettive filosofiche, pages 249–269. Mimesis Edizioni, Milano, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_ex_2013,\n\taddress = {Milano},\n\ttitle = {Ex oppositis quid. {Cusano}, {Erasmo}, {Leibniz}},\n\tabstract = {To avoid the mystical rapture that seizes interpreters put before the theme of unitas oppositorum in Cusanus and Leibniz, this contribution shall move from the prosaic question: what does ensue from such opposites or from their conjunction? 2) interweave the analysis with some external point of view, notably that of Erasmus. This question will be investigated on the background of two antitethical traditions in dealing philosophically with opposition and contradiction, although in the end we shall try and find out other ways and reasons for connecting the two thinkers on the ground of the various possible unitates oppositorum, than those of the metaphysical doctrine of the opposites.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Cusano e {Leibniz}. {Prospettive} filosofiche},\n\tpublisher = {Mimesis Edizioni},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Dall'Igna, Antonio and Roberi, Damiano},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Contradiction, Cusanus, Erasmus of Rotterdam, Harmony, Platonism and Aristotelicism.},\n\tpages = {249--269},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La filosofia dell'Ateneo torinese e il Risorgimento nazionale.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Roero, C. S., editor(s), Dall'Università di Torino all'Italia unita. Contributi dei docenti al Risorgimento e all'Unità, pages 137–167. Deputazione Subalpina di Storia Patria, Torino, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_filosofia_2013,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {La filosofia dell'{Ateneo} torinese e il {Risorgimento} nazionale},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Dall'{Università} di {Torino} all'{Italia} unita. {Contributi} dei docenti al {Risorgimento} e all'{Unità}},\n\tpublisher = {Deputazione Subalpina di Storia Patria},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Roero, Clara Silvia},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Italian Philosophy},\n\tpages = {137--167},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Special issue: L’incidenza di Leibniz negli sviluppi della fenomenologia husserliana.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Bianchini, F.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Discipline Filosofiche, 23(2): 1–224. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_special_2013,\n\ttitle = {Special issue: {L}’incidenza di {Leibniz} negli sviluppi della fenomenologia husserliana},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Discipline Filosofiche},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Bianchini, Francesco},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {1--224},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Vacui ratione. Observability and Causal Powers of a Nonentity.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2(3): 4:1–4:22. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_vacui_2013,\n\ttitle = {Vacui ratione. {Observability} and {Causal} {Powers} of a {Nonentity}},\n\tvolume = {2},\n\tissn = {2280-8574},\n\tdoi = {10.13135/2280-8574/412},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Causality, Observation, Vacuum theory},\n\tpages = {4:1--4:22},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2012\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n … Aliorum diligentiae relinquo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; Palumbo, M.; Varani, G.; Antognazza, M. R.; Fonnesu, L.; and Palaia, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Li, W., editor(s), Komma und Kathedrale: Tradition, Bedeutung und Herausforderung der Leibniz-Edition, pages 225–234. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini__2012,\n\taddress = {Berlin},\n\ttitle = {… {Aliorum} diligentiae relinquo},\n\tcopyright = {All rights reserved},\n\tisbn = {978-3-05-006007-1},\n\tabstract = {A remembrance of the late Albert Heinekamp.},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tbooktitle = {Komma und {Kathedrale}: {Tradition}, {Bedeutung} und {Herausforderung} der {Leibniz}-{Edition}},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico and Palumbo, Margherita and Varani, Giovanna and Antognazza, Maria Rosa and Fonnesu, Luca and Palaia, Roberto},\n\teditor = {Li, Wenchao},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tpages = {225--234},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Of Engineers and Dragons. The JIHI Logo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 1: 6:1–6:9. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_engineers_2012,\n\ttitle = {Of {Engineers} and {Dragons}. {The} {JIHI} {Logo}},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tissn = {2280-8574},\n\tdoi = {10.13135/2280-8574/151},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {Allegory, Dragons, Images of Philosophy, Renaissance Engineers},\n\tpages = {6:1--6:9},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La concordia e l'armonia. Leibniz e la globalizzazione di una tradizione europea.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 51(129-131): 373–381. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_concordia_2012,\n\ttitle = {La concordia e l'armonia. {Leibniz} e la globalizzazione di una tradizione europea},\n\tvolume = {51},\n\turl = {https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/13155},\n\tabstract = {Leibniz participates in a quite important thought tradition of christian Europe, that of concordia between Christians, or between religions. With him this heritage is universalised: the globalization of concordia gives birth to Leibniz's harmony of universal truth, that the whole of humankind can access.\nLeibniz participa en la influyente tradición del pensamiento de la Europa cristiana que fomenta la concordia entre los cristianos o entre las religiones. Por Leibniz este bagaje fue universalizado: la globalisación de la concordia engendra su idea de una armonía de la verdad universal, que puede ser accessada por todo el género humano.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {129-131},\n\tjournal = {Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {Harmony, Truth, Universalism, Variety},\n\tpages = {373--381},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Le giustificazioni della guerra in Erasmo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Baldini, E. A.; and Firpo, M., editor(s), Religione e politica in Erasmo da Rotterdam, pages 51–82. Edizioni di storia e letteratura, Roma, 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_giustificazioni_2012,\n\taddress = {Roma},\n\ttitle = {Le giustificazioni della guerra in {Erasmo}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Religione e politica in {Erasmo} da {Rotterdam}},\n\tpublisher = {Edizioni di storia e letteratura},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Baldini, Enzo A. and Firpo, Massimo},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {Erasmus of Rotterdam, War},\n\tpages = {51--82},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n “Molecole viventi” e “natura senza dèi”: anime e microscopi tra filosofia, scienza e letteratura.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Messina, S.; and Trivero, P., editor(s), Metamorfosi dei Lumi 6. Le belle lettere e le scienze, pages 42–71. AAccademia University Press, Torino, 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_molecole_2012,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {“{Molecole} viventi” e “natura senza dèi”: anime e microscopi tra filosofia, scienza e letteratura},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Metamorfosi dei {Lumi} 6. {Le} belle lettere e le scienze},\n\tpublisher = {aAccademia University Press},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Messina, Simone and Trivero, Paola},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {Buffon, Living Body, Mary Shelley, Natura},\n\tpages = {42--71},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2011\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Both Mechanistic and Teleological. The Genesis of Leibniz's Concept of Organism, with Special Regard to His Du rapport general de toutes choses.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Busche, H.; and Hessbrüggen-Walter, S., editor(s), Departure to Modern Europe – Philosophy between 1400 and 1700, pages 1216–1235. Meiner, Hamburg, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_both_2011,\n\taddress = {Hamburg},\n\ttitle = {Both {Mechanistic} and {Teleological}. {The} {Genesis} of {Leibniz}'s {Concept} of {Organism}, with {Special} {Regard} to {His} {Du} rapport general de toutes choses},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {Departure to {Modern} {Europe} – {Philosophy} between 1400 and 1700},\n\tpublisher = {Meiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Busche, Hubertus and Hessbrüggen-Walter, Stephan},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tkeywords = {Organism, Teleology},\n\tpages = {1216--1235},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Organic vs. the Living in the Light of Leibniz's Aristotelianisms.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Nachtomy, O.; and Smith, J. E. H., editor(s), Machines of Nature and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz, of Synthese New Historical Library, pages 81–94. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_organic_2011,\n\taddress = {Berlin-Heidelberg-New York},\n\tseries = {Synthese {New} {Historical} {Library}},\n\ttitle = {The {Organic} vs. the {Living} in the {Light} of {Leibniz}'s {Aristotelianisms}},\n\tabstract = {The paper argues that the development of Leibniz’s metaphysics during the 1670s and 1680s shows that its core focus is not a theory of substance, but a theory of essence and existence. The theory of substance is a theoretical middle ground that connects pure metaphysics to the epistemic level of natural science, on the one hand through dynamics, and on the other hand through a theory of the composition of substances. The latter in turn is two-sided, with a permanent component, namely, pre-established harmony, and a variety of solutions to the problem of what will be called by Leibniz “composite substance” – as well more generally, as solutions to the “form-matter” problem that is traditional in the theory of substance and that represents a recurring strain of Aristotelianism, with different phases and versions, in Leibniz’s thought. For Pasini, the relation between the dominating monad and the bodily machine is of particular importance in Leibniz’s multi-level monadological universe. Aristotelian conceptual tools are instrumentally used by Leibniz to provide a theory that can describe its metaphysical structure, but at the core of this theory we can find a peculiarly Leibnizian identification of the true living and the ‘vere unum’.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {67},\n\tbooktitle = {Machines of {Nature} and {Corporeal} {Substances} in {Leibniz}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Nachtomy, Ohad and Smith, Justin E. H.},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tkeywords = {Aristotelianism, Organism, Theories of the Living, Trascendentale},\n\tpages = {81--94},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La doctrine de la spontanéité dans la Théodicée.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Rateau, P., editor(s), Lectures et interprétations des Essais de théodicée de G.W. Leibniz, of Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte, pages 155–173. F. Steiner, Wiesbaden, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_doctrine_2011,\n\taddress = {Wiesbaden},\n\tseries = {Studia {Leibnitiana} {Sonderhefte}},\n\ttitle = {La doctrine de la spontanéité dans la {Théodicée}},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tnumber = {40},\n\tbooktitle = {Lectures et interprétations des {Essais} de théodicée de {G}.{W}. {Leibniz}},\n\tpublisher = {F. Steiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Rateau, Paul},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tkeywords = {Spontaneity},\n\tpages = {155--173},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2010\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Some Notes on the Role of General Principles and Axioms in the Reconstruction of Leibniz's Philosophy.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Leibniz und die Entstehung der Modernität, of Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte, pages 93–100. F. Steiner, Wiesbaden, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_notes_2010,\n\taddress = {Wiesbaden},\n\tseries = {Studia {Leibnitiana} {Sonderhefte}},\n\ttitle = {Some {Notes} on the {Role} of {General} {Principles} and {Axioms} in the {Reconstruction} of {Leibniz}'s {Philosophy}},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {37},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz und die {Entstehung} der {Modernität}},\n\tpublisher = {F. Steiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tpages = {93--100},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La scuola di Peano e il secondo problema di Hilbert.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Roero, C. S., editor(s), Peano e la sua scuola fra matematica, logica e interlingua. Atti del congresso internazionale di studi (Torino, 6-7 ottobre 2008), pages 327–367. Deputazione Subalpina di Storia Patria, Torino, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_scuola_2010,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {La scuola di {Peano} e il secondo problema di {Hilbert}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Peano e la sua scuola fra matematica, logica e interlingua. {Atti} del congresso internazionale di studi ({Torino}, 6-7 ottobre 2008)},\n\tpublisher = {Deputazione Subalpina di Storia Patria},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Roero, Clara Silvia},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {Demonstration, Foundations of Mathematics, Hilbert's Problems, Peano},\n\tpages = {327--367},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Complete Concepts as Histories.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Leibnitiana, 42(2): 229–243. 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_complete_2010,\n\ttitle = {Complete {Concepts} as {Histories}},\n\tvolume = {42},\n\tabstract = {Appeared in 2012. It was presented in conference form in the concluding session of the 2011 Leibniz-Kongress. Complete concepts, a key notion of Leibniz's philosophy, are analysed in their metaphysical genesis in Leibniz's theory of creation. Both forms they are supposed to have (collections of predicates, individual histories) are discussed in the framework of Leibniz's metaphysics of individual essences.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Studia Leibnitiana},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tkeywords = {Complete Concepts, Creation, Essence, Possible Worlds, Possibles},\n\tpages = {229--243},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2009\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Wesen, Kraft, Stoff und Leibniz' \"Kosmologie\": Einen Aspekt des Leibniz-Mythos neu Denken.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Barke, E.; Wernstedt, R.; and Breger, H., editor(s), Leibniz Neu Denken, of Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte, pages 63–73. F. Steiner, Wiesbaden, 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_wesen_2009,\n\taddress = {Wiesbaden},\n\tseries = {Studia {Leibnitiana} {Sonderhefte}},\n\ttitle = {Wesen, {Kraft}, {Stoff} und {Leibniz}' "{Kosmologie}": {Einen} {Aspekt} des {Leibniz}-{Mythos} neu {Denken}},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tnumber = {38},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz {Neu} {Denken}},\n\tpublisher = {F. Steiner},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Barke, Erich and Wernstedt, Rolf and Breger, Herbert},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tkeywords = {Essence},\n\tpages = {63--73},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2008\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Erasmo da Rotterdam e la cultura europea. Erasmus of Rotterdam and European Culture.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Rossi, P. B.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n SISMEL - Edizioni del Galluzzo, Firenze, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{pasini_erasmo_2008,\n\taddress = {Firenze},\n\ttitle = {Erasmo da {Rotterdam} e la cultura europea. {Erasmus} of {Rotterdam} and {European} {Culture}},\n\tabstract = {A volume issued from the Colloquium on Erasmus of Rotterdam and European Culture (Turin, IT, 2006; E. Pasini - P.B. Rossi, Premessa, pp. vii-x).},\n\tlanguage = {ita eng},\n\tpublisher = {SISMEL - Edizioni del Galluzzo},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Rossi, Pietro B.},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {Erasmus of Rotterdam},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dubbio e scetticismo in Erasmo da Rotterdam.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Pasini, E.; and Rossi, P. B., editor(s), Erasmo da Rotterdam e la cultura europea. Erasmus of Rotterdam and European Culture, pages 199–250. SISMEL - Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_dubbio_2008,\n\ttitle = {Dubbio e scetticismo in {Erasmo} da {Rotterdam}},\n\tabstract = {Popkin set Erasmus as the beginner of modern skepticism, and made of him an apologetic sort of sceptic, that uses doubt to make acceptable the tradition and authority of the church. The pivotal moment is the debate concerning free will. Luther is particularly upset by Erasmus' professions of skepticism in his De libero arbitrio, although it was meant by him as an appeal to moderation: the key to Erasmus' skepticism isn't religious incredulity, but putting doubt to good use, in suspending judgements that are not necessary and might be dangerous to peace and concord among christians. Doubt isn't endorsed by the christian tradition, nor by the literary one, and technical treatments (in logic or rhetorics) are not favored by Erasmus. Moreover skepticism receives the same ambiguous consideration that Erasmus has for philosophy in general. But he practices doubt nevertheless, in both forms of dubitare and ambigere. The latter is particularly important, since this practice of skepticism is particularly useful in avoiding the common error of doing what one had better omit. These ideas of Erasmus play a role in his cultural, theolocial, and ecclesiastical program, developed by him along many years, and specifically in the years of the crudest confrontation among emerging religious factions. In the works of the greats catholic skeptics, such as Huet, skepticism and fideism will be tightly connected, Erasmus supports skepticism as a means to gain for all contending parties a right to doubt and ask for suspension of judgement in matter of warlike controversy, aiming instead to concile intellectual freedom and irenic perspectives.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Erasmo da {Rotterdam} e la cultura europea. {Erasmus} of {Rotterdam} and {European} {Culture}},\n\tpublisher = {SISMEL - Edizioni del Galluzzo},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Rossi, Pietro B.},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {Doubt, Erasmus of Rotterdam, Scepticism},\n\tpages = {199--250},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ludovico Geymonat (1908-1991): filosofia e scienza.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Cuozzo, G.; and Riconda, G., editor(s), Le due Torino. Primato della religione o primato della politica?, pages 241–256. Trauben, Torino, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_ludovico_2008,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Ludovico {Geymonat} (1908-1991): filosofia e scienza},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Le due {Torino}. {Primato} della religione o primato della politica?},\n\tpublisher = {Trauben},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Cuozzo, Gianluca and Riconda, Giuseppe},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {Ludovico Geymonat, Philosophy of Science},\n\tpages = {241--256},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2006\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Kinds of Unity, Modes of Union.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Einheit in der Vielheit, Akten des VIII. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongreß, pages 780–787, Hannover, 2006. Leibniz-Gesellschaft\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{pasini_kinds_2006,\n\taddress = {Hannover},\n\ttitle = {Kinds of {Unity}, {Modes} of {Union}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-9808167-1-7},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/792z-eb89},\n\tabstract = {Kinds of unity, modes of union—why bother? Does Leibniz ever focus on “union”, anyway? It is not before 1713 that Leibniz gets rid of certain metaphysical concerns which, although secondary for him, were present to his mind since the time of his 1708 answer to Tournemine, who had bespoken a “real union” between the soul and the body (GP VI, 595-96). Nonetheless, this very text shows that for Leibniz unity and union don’t partake an equivalent metaphysical dignity. In a short text that might be dated to 1709, he writes down a very clean description of a quite innovative model of the “composite substance”, the same “substance composée” that will be quietly adopted in the PNG and the Monadology. Not much later Leibniz will write to Rémond about a kind of composition, unexpectedly labeled by Leibniz “metaphysical union”, that comes to pass, not in the form of some “unio substantialis superaddita”, or “union reelle”, but, we might say, as part of a general unio ad modum harmoniæ. But before of that Leibniz had developed a complex theory of the 'substantiatum', and two unpublished texts of his concerning this theory are presented and discussed.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {Einheit in der {Vielheit}, {Akten} des {VIII}. {Internationalen} {Leibniz}-{Kongreß}},\n\tpublisher = {Leibniz-Gesellschaft},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tkeywords = {Substance, Unity},\n\tpages = {780--787},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2005\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La Monadologie: histoire de naissance.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Pasini, E., editor(s), La Monadologie de Leibniz. Genèse et contexte, pages 85–122. Mimesis Edizioni, Paris-Milano, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_monadologie_2005,\n\taddress = {Paris-Milano},\n\ttitle = {La {Monadologie}: histoire de naissance},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tbooktitle = {La {Monadologie} de {Leibniz}. {Genèse} et contexte},\n\tpublisher = {Mimesis Edizioni},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Monadology},\n\tpages = {85--122},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La Monadologie de Leibniz. Genèse et contexte.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.,\n editor.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Mimesis Edizioni, Paris-Milano, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{pasini_monadologie_2005-1,\n\taddress = {Paris-Milano},\n\ttitle = {La {Monadologie} de {Leibniz}. {Genèse} et contexte},\n\tabstract = {(Introduction, pp. v-xii).},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tpublisher = {Mimesis Edizioni},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Monadology},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Leibniz alla caccia di Spinoza.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Gensini, S., editor(s), Linguaggio, mente, conoscenza. Intorno a Leibniz, pages 59–86. Carocci, Roma, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_leibniz_2005,\n\taddress = {Roma},\n\ttitle = {Leibniz alla caccia di {Spinoza}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Linguaggio, mente, conoscenza. {Intorno} a {Leibniz}},\n\tpublisher = {Carocci},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Gensini, Stefano},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Spinoza},\n\tpages = {59--86},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n L'altra faccia dell'uomo della Luna. Lambert e l'Erfindungskunst.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Mori, M.; and Poggi, S., editor(s), La misura dell'uomo. Filosofia, teologia e scienza nel dibattito antropologico in Germania (1760-1915), pages 49–70. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_altra_2005,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\ttitle = {L'altra faccia dell'uomo della {Luna}. {Lambert} e l'{Erfindungskunst}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {La misura dell'uomo. {Filosofia}, teologia e scienza nel dibattito antropologico in {Germania} (1760-1915)},\n\tpublisher = {Il Mulino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Mori, Massimo and Poggi, Stefano},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Invention, Lambert JH},\n\tpages = {49--70},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Cinque storie sulla Monadologia di Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In d'Ippolito , B. M.; Montano, A.; and Piro, F., editor(s), Monadi e monadologie. Il mondo degli individui tra Bruno, Leibniz e Husserl, pages 147–167. Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_cinque_2005,\n\taddress = {Soveria Mannelli},\n\ttitle = {Cinque storie sulla {Monadologia} di {Leibniz}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Monadi e monadologie. {Il} mondo degli individui tra {Bruno}, {Leibniz} e {Husserl}},\n\tpublisher = {Rubbettino},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {d'Ippolito, Bianca Maria and Montano, Aniello and Piro, Francesco},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tkeywords = {Monadology},\n\tpages = {147--167},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2004\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Peano e la filosofia della matematica.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Roero, C. S.; Giacardi, L.; and Gallo, E., editor(s), Conferenze e seminari 2003-2004, pages 203–220. Associazione Subalpina Mathesis, Torino, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_peano_2004,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Peano e la filosofia della matematica},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Conferenze e seminari 2003-2004},\n\tpublisher = {Associazione Subalpina Mathesis},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Roero, Clara Silvia and Giacardi, Livia and Gallo, Elisa},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tkeywords = {Peano, Philosophy of Mathematics},\n\tpages = {203--220},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2003\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Le ontologie tascabili di Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Rivista di estetica, 43(22-24). 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_ontologie_2003,\n\ttitle = {Le ontologie tascabili di {Leibniz}},\n\tvolume = {43},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {22-24},\n\tjournal = {Rivista di estetica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tkeywords = {Ontology},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2002\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Alienazione.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Portinaro, P. P., editor(s), I concetti del male, pages 3–18. Einaudi, Torino, 2002.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_alienazione_2002,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Alienazione},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {I concetti del male},\n\tpublisher = {Einaudi},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Portinaro, Pier Paolo},\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tkeywords = {Alienation},\n\tpages = {3--18},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2001\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La philosophie des mathématiques chez Leibniz. Lignes d'investigation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Nihil sine ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G.W. Leibniz. Akten des VII. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongreß, pages 954–963, Berlin, 2001. Leibniz-Gesellschaft\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{pasini_philosophie_2001,\n\taddress = {Berlin},\n\ttitle = {La philosophie des mathématiques chez {Leibniz}. {Lignes} d'investigation},\n\tisbn = {3-9080978-9-7},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:26591},\n\tdoi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/9est-qh17},\n\tabstract = {This study of Leibniz's philosophical views on mathematics starts from the rank he assigned to them in the encyclopedia of knowledge. Mathematics, in many Leibnitian writings, is proposed to other disciplines as an example to follow: they are an essential component of the new, at the same time encyclopaedic and demonstrative knowledge he is advocating. If we then consider the object of mathematics and their foundations, we see that Leibniz grants an ideal existence to mathematical notions; an algorithmic existence, via their definition or thanks to procedures; and a kind of Pythagorean existence which is based on the intrinsic rationality of the natural order. On this tripod (either ontological or epistemological) mathematical objects base their existence, which depends in the end on relations between real-world entities, harmony relationships and finality.},\n\tlanguage = {fra},\n\tbooktitle = {Nihil sine ratione. {Mensch}, {Natur} und {Technik} im {Wirken} von {G}.{W}. {Leibniz}. {Akten} des {VII}. {Internationalen} {Leibniz}-{Kongreß}},\n\tpublisher = {Leibniz-Gesellschaft},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2001},\n\tkeywords = {Philosophy of Mathematics},\n\tpages = {954--963},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduzione a G.W. Leibniz, Discorso intorno al metodo della certezza...\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Rivista di estetica, 41(1): 68–70. 2001.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_introduzione_2001,\n\tseries = {n.s.},\n\ttitle = {Introduzione a {G}.{W}. {Leibniz}, {Discorso} intorno al metodo della certezza...},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Rivista di estetica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2001},\n\tpages = {68--70},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Il carteggio fra Peano e Camillo Berneri.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Roero, C. S., editor(s), Giuseppe Peano. Matematica, cultura e società, pages 49–59. L'artistica, Savigliano, 2001.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_il_2001,\n\taddress = {Savigliano},\n\ttitle = {Il carteggio fra {Peano} e {Camillo} {Berneri}},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Giuseppe {Peano}. {Matematica}, cultura e società},\n\tpublisher = {L'artistica},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Roero, Clara Silvia},\n\tyear = {2001},\n\tkeywords = {Anarchism, Camillo Berneri, Interlinguistics, Peano},\n\tpages = {49--59},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2000\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Cinquant'anni di storiografia filosofica in Italia. Omaggio a Carlo Augusto Viano.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.; and Donaggio, E.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Il Mulino, Bologna, 2000.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{pasini_cinquantanni_2000,\n\taddress = {Bologna},\n\ttitle = {Cinquant'anni di storiografia filosofica in {Italia}. {Omaggio} a {Carlo} {Augusto} {Viano}},\n\tabstract = {Acts of the symposium on "50 years of philosophical historiography in Italy: A balance" held in Turin (IT) in 1999 in honor of prof. Carlo Augusto Viano.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tpublisher = {Il Mulino},\n\teditor = {Pasini, Enrico and Donaggio, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2000},\n\tkeywords = {Italian Philosophy},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cinquant'anni di storiografia filosofica in italia: un bilancio.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Rivista di storia della filosofia, 55(1): 118–120. 2000.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Cinquant'anni$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_cinquantanni_2000-1,\n\ttitle = {Cinquant'anni di storiografia filosofica in italia: un bilancio},\n\tvolume = {55},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/44023713},\n\tabstract = {Chronicle of the symposium on "50 years of philosophical historiography in Italy: A balance" held in Turin (IT) in 1999.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Rivista di storia della filosofia},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2000},\n\tkeywords = {Italian Philosophy},\n\tpages = {118--120},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Scritti filosofici.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leibniz, G. W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Utet, Torino, 2000.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{leibniz_scritti_2000,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Scritti filosofici},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tpublisher = {Utet},\n\tauthor = {Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm},\n\teditor = {Mugnai, Massimo and Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {2000},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1997\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Arcanum Artis Inveniendi: Leibniz and Analysis.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Otte, M.; and Panza, M., editor(s), Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History and Philosophy, of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pages 35–46. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.\n http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/g9n6-wt47\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Arcanum$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_arcanum_1997,\n\taddress = {Dordrecht},\n\tseries = {Boston {Studies} in the {Philosophy} of {Science}},\n\ttitle = {Arcanum {Artis} {Inveniendi}: {Leibniz} and {Analysis}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4020-0255-7},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:26583},\n\tabstract = {Leibniz was undoubtedly a many-sided man, and a polymathic mind, if ever there was one. The concept of analysis is notoriously, for its part, a polycephalous monster, and nearly all its meanings are spread through Leibniz’s works, in juridical, scientific, mathematical, or philosophical contexts, under different conditions and with different purposes. Yet even for such manifold uses should exist some common ground and univocal meaning. The analysis of thoughts and that of truths, the analysis of problems and that of things, all imply slightly or consistently different proceedings, and nevertheless they must perform somehow one and the same operation.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {196},\n\tbooktitle = {Analysis and {Synthesis} in {Mathematics}: {History} and {Philosophy}},\n\tpublisher = {Kluwer},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Otte, Michael and Panza, Marco},\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tnote = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/g9n6-wt47},\n\tkeywords = {Analysis},\n\tpages = {35--46},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1996\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Corpo e funzioni cognitive in Leibniz.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Centro di studi del pensiero filosofico del Cinquecento e del Seicento in relazione ai problemi della scienzaFranco Angeli, Milano, 1996.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{pasini_corpo_1996,\n\taddress = {Milano},\n\tseries = {Centro di studi del pensiero filosofico del {Cinquecento} e del {Seicento} in relazione ai problemi della scienza},\n\ttitle = {Corpo e funzioni cognitive in {Leibniz}},\n\tabstract = {The Author attempts to reconstruct Leibniz's philosophy through the physiology of the processes of perception, inner sense, and general cognition, and their metaphysical implications, using both Leibniz's published and unpublished works. The volume contains four chapters ("The Young Leibniz", "Thought Mechanisms", "The Means of Perception", "The Functions of Imagination"), and a number of hitherto unpublished texts by Leibniz.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {43},\n\tpublisher = {Franco Angeli},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1996},\n\tkeywords = {Cognition, Imagination, Living Body, Physiology},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1995\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Segni e algoritmo nell'analisi leibniziana.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Panza, M.; and Roero, C. S., editor(s), Geometria, flussioni e differenziali. Osservazioni sul rapporto fra tradizione e innovazione nella matematica del Seicento, pages 385–412. La città del sole, Napoli, 1995.\n http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/jm85-s075\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Segni$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{pasini_segni_1995,\n\taddress = {Napoli},\n\ttitle = {Segni e algoritmo nell'analisi leibniziana},\n\tisbn = {978-88-86521-17-8},\n\tshorttitle = {Geometria, flussioni e differenziali},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24377/},\n\tabstract = {Descartes' Regulae are the first text in which the idea of a universal mathematics is put in connection with algebra. Young Descartes thinks of geometrical figures as a representation of algebraic procedures so as to guarantee its feasibility: i.e., an epistemological foundation of analysis. The young Leibniz starts from a similar problem. He distinguishes, with Hobbes, between notes and signs (memory and communication), but, against Hobbes, he argues that operations based on arbitrary signs provide truths that are not necessarily arbitrary. Against Descartes, he decisively focused on the tools of knowledge, rather than on the faculties of the mind—the principal tool being systems of signs, or characters, governed by combinatorial and operational rules. Yet the only analysis that Leibniz brought to some completion is differential and integral calculus.  It is indeed similar to the art of characters, because it is an ‘art of invention’, it is based on well-used signs, and it is comparable to a ‘filum meditandi’. In controversies against critics of his calculus, as well as in his further research on the foundation of infinitesimal techniques, Leibniz gives an increasingly prominent role to sets of rules for the elimination of evanescent quantities rather than to the existential interpretation of signs.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tbooktitle = {Geometria, flussioni e differenziali. {Osservazioni} sul rapporto fra tradizione e innovazione nella matematica del {Seicento}},\n\tpublisher = {La città del sole},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\teditor = {Panza, Marco and Roero, Clara Silvia},\n\tyear = {1995},\n\tnote = {http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/jm85-s075},\n\tkeywords = {Algorithm, Analysis},\n\tpages = {385--412},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1994\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Korrespondenten von G. W. Leibniz: 12. Detlev Clüver. Geb. um 1645 in Schleswig - Gest. den 21. Februar 1708 in Hamburg.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Leibnitiana, 26(1): 108–124. 1994.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Korrespondenten$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_korrespondenten_1994,\n\ttitle = {Korrespondenten von {G}. {W}. {Leibniz}: 12. {Detlev} {Clüver}. {Geb}. um 1645 in {Schleswig} - {Gest}. den 21. {Februar} 1708 in {Hamburg}},\n\tvolume = {26},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/40694253},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/45g2-1379},\n\tabstract = {Detlev Clüver (1645-1708) was among the first to criticize Leibniz's new infinitesimal analysis. Although his criticisms were vague and his methods inconsistent, Leibniz had always for him a friendly sort of consideration. The article presents Clüver's biography, writings, and thought, together with a detailed description of Leibniz's relations to him and of their correspondence, and contains a bibliography of Clüver's writings.},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Studia Leibnitiana},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1994},\n\tpages = {108--124},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Perception, Imagination and Leibniz's Theory of Will.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Leibniz und Europa. VI. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongreß, Vorträge, pages 581–588, Hannover, 1994. Leibniz-Gesellschaft\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Perception,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{pasini_perception_1994,\n\taddress = {Hannover},\n\ttitle = {Perception, {Imagination} and {Leibniz}'s {Theory} of {Will}},\n\tisbn = {3-9800978-7-0},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24367/},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/pcsw-zm97},\n\tabstract = {The role of insensible appetitions (similar to insensible perceptions, or petites perceptions) in Leibniz's theory of appetite and will is sketched. Since such insensible appetitions are the medium of interaction, through the body, between the individual and the physical world, and the form in which, at a microscopic level, environmental sensations originate, it can be concluded that the internal sense, i.e. the imagination, plays to some extent the role of a channel through which such environmental perceptions are collected and organized; here the sentiment of phenomenal reality takes its form, that is then offered both to knowledge and to practice.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz und {Europa}. {VI}. {Internationaler} {Leibniz}-{Kongreß}, {Vorträge}},\n\tpublisher = {Leibniz-Gesellschaft},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1994},\n\tkeywords = {Imagination, Perception, Will},\n\tpages = {581--588},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La prima recezione della monadologia. Dalla tesi di Gottsched alla controversia sulla dottrina delle monadi.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studi settecenteschi, 14: 107–163. 1994.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_prima_1994,\n\ttitle = {La prima recezione della monadologia. {Dalla} tesi di {Gottsched} alla controversia sulla dottrina delle monadi},\n\tvolume = {14},\n\tissn = {0392-7326},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24355/},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/eg57-ce67},\n\tabstract = {The paper addresses the first phase in the reception of Leibniz's Monadology, starting with Johann Christoph Gottsched's dissertation of 1721, until the publication of the essays presented for the prize question on monads proposed by the Berlin Academy of Sciences 25 years later. A critical edition of Gottsched's “Dubia circa monades Leibnitianas quatenus ipsae pro elementis corporum venditantur” is added as an appendix.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tjournal = {Studi settecenteschi},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1994},\n\tkeywords = {Gottsched, Monadology, Monads},\n\tpages = {107--163},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1993\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Il reale e l'immaginario. La fondazione del calcolo infinitesimale nel pensiero di Leibniz.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Edizioni Sonda, Torino, 1993.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Il$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{pasini_il_1993,\n\taddress = {Torino},\n\ttitle = {Il reale e l'immaginario. {La} fondazione del calcolo infinitesimale nel pensiero di {Leibniz}},\n\tisbn = {88-7106-070-9},\n\tshorttitle = {Il reale e l'immaginario},\n\turl = {http://bridgeurl.com/il-reale-e-l-immaginario},\n\tabstract = {A study on Leibniz's evolving foundation of his infinitesimal calculus. DOIs for the individual chapters: 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/6h9a-b936 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/rnt6-jr48 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/sd5d-v824 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/s16n-km21 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/jt6b-ab03 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/146q-3t47},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tpublisher = {Edizioni Sonda},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1993},\n\tkeywords = {Infinitely Small, Infinitesimal Calculus},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1992\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mathesis und Phantasie. Die Rolle der Einbildungskraft im Umfeld der Descartes’schen Regulae.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studia Leibnitiana, 24(2): 160–176. 1992.\n https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24133/\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Mathesis$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_mathesis_1992,\n\ttitle = {Mathesis und {Phantasie}. {Die} {Rolle} der {Einbildungskraft} im {Umfeld} der {Descartes}’schen {Regulae}},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/40694215},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/q1qh-ar02},\n\tabstract = {The paper deals with the connection of "mathesis", intuition and imagination in Descartes' "Regulae ad directionem ingenii" - young Descartes' first writing about methodology, intended to set the foundation of a "mathesis generalis" - and in some of his followers/critics, in particular Leibniz, on the background of the so-called psychology of faculties. Two are the main points at stake: the presence of mental images in thought processes, and the cognitive functions of the imagination. A thorough analysis of Descartes' examples of intuitive, not-imaginative cognition shows the difficulties in his approach. Different solutions will be proposed by Descartes himself and by most cartesians, on the one hand, and by Tschirnhaus on the other hand. Leibniz's peculiar solution is finally considered.},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Studia Leibnitiana},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tnote = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24133/},\n\tkeywords = {Imagination, Inner Sense},\n\tpages = {160--176},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n L'antico e il nuovo.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MultiMedia, (7-8): 37–43; 40–45. 1992.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_antico_1992,\n\ttitle = {L'antico e il nuovo},\n\tabstract = {The paper discusses problems related to historical change in the field of technology applied to the preservation and communication of knowledge. Debates of the years 1990s about the possible decadence of (printed) books in favour of other technologies, are evaluated with the help of a historical analogy. The art of memory was a widespread non-material technique for managing information in a world of prevalent oral communication, which was set aside by the new technologies of printed communication. In the first part, the Author discusses the final phase in the history of the art of memory, sketching Lambert Schenckel's biography as a good example of utmost individual success in the teaching of the art. Schenckel's time sees the maximum demand for teaching in the art of memory; nevertheless those are the years when the printed book has already completely won its battle. The second part regards the possibility of a survival of the book as a technological model (i.e. as a model to build applications in new technologies for knowledge communication), notwithstanding the technologies involved in its production, just as the art of memory has been recently used as a model for constructing hypermedia, and just as the book itself survived technological revolutions in past ages. The issue is discussed carefully avoiding to engage in prophecy.},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {7-8},\n\tjournal = {MultiMedia},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tkeywords = {Art of Memory, Lambert Schenckel, New Media, Schenkel},\n\tpages = {37--43; 40--45},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1988\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Die private Kontroverse des G.W. Leibniz mit sich selbst. Handschriften über die Infinitesimalrechnung im Jahre 1702.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Leibniz. Tradition und Aktualität, pages 695–709, Hannover, 1988. Leibniz-Gesellschaft\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Die$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{pasini_private_1988,\n\taddress = {Hannover},\n\ttitle = {Die private {Kontroverse} des {G}.{W}. {Leibniz} mit sich selbst. {Handschriften} über die {Infinitesimalrechnung} im {Jahre} 1702},\n\turl = {https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24131},\n\tdoi = {10.17613/hqqm-ct50},\n\tlanguage = {deu},\n\tbooktitle = {Leibniz. {Tradition} und {Aktualität}},\n\tpublisher = {Leibniz-Gesellschaft},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1988},\n\tkeywords = {Infinitely Small, Infinitesimal Calculus},\n\tpages = {695--709},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1985\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Niklas Luhmann e la teoria dei sistemi. Presupposti e riferimenti (Prima parte: teorie del sistema sociale come sistema in equilibrio).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pasini, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Psicologia e società. Rivista di psicologia sociale, 10(3-4): 5–8. 1985.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{pasini_niklas_1985,\n\ttitle = {Niklas {Luhmann} e la teoria dei sistemi. {Presupposti} e riferimenti ({Prima} parte: teorie del sistema sociale come sistema in equilibrio)},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tlanguage = {ita},\n\tnumber = {3-4},\n\tjournal = {Psicologia e società. Rivista di psicologia sociale},\n\tauthor = {Pasini, Enrico},\n\tyear = {1985},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, Systems Theory},\n\tpages = {5--8},\n}\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n