var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F77162%2Fcollections%2FWQJPRW95%2Fitems%3Fkey%3D5dHLjY2VYbkdoocbmegh1LV4%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F77162%2Fcollections%2FWQJPRW95%2Fitems%3Fkey%3D5dHLjY2VYbkdoocbmegh1LV4%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F77162%2Fcollections%2FWQJPRW95%2Fitems%3Fkey%3D5dHLjY2VYbkdoocbmegh1LV4%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&jsonp=1\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
  2. \n
  3. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
  4. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2018\n \n \n (14)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Faith-Based Social Entrepreneurship: The Integration of Faith and Business for Sustainable Social Impact.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Beech, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Faith-BasedPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@phdthesis{beech_faith-based_2018,\n\ttitle = {Faith-{Based} {Social} {Entrepreneurship}: {The} {Integration} of {Faith} and {Business} for {Sustainable} {Social} {Impact}},\n\tshorttitle = {Faith-{Based} {Social} {Entrepreneurship}},\n\turl = {https://search.proquest.com/openview/90becc8294f4094c1a59670efd181349/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y},\n\tabstract = {Faith-based nonprofit organizations face myriad challenges in securing a sufficient\ndonation base within a restricted pool of donors. This funding challenge often limits their ability to conduct their mission. To offset this challenge and model self-sufficiency, many faith-based organizations are looking to evolve into hybrid platforms that operate as faith-based social entrepreneurial ventures and manage to a triple bottom line of social good, financial impact, and spiritual mission. Yet even with the best of intentions, successfully merging a for-profit business model into a preexisting nonprofit organization often fails, even before the faith-factor is in play. This study of social entrepreneurship in faith-based nonprofits is conducted to identify how and why successful integration of the hybrid business model for sustainable social impact occurs. Using a realist synthesis approach, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the mechanisms that correlated to a positive integration of the disparate business models and the outcome of a sustainable organizational structure. Five organizational characteristics and five management practices were identified as key underlying mechanisms that led to the creation of a successful merged hybrid organization. The five characteristics were 1) Institutional Logic, 2) Motivations and Values, 3) Resources, 4) Decision-Making, and 5) Culture. The five practices were 1) Focus on Launch, 2) Cultivation of Staff and Board, 3) Timing of Culture Integration, 4) Addressing Unstable Structures, and 5) View on Generating Profit. These results, along with their implications for managers are presented and discussed within the context of the Business Model Canvas to offer a usable guide for practitioners seeking to successfully move their organizations from a traditional faith-based nonprofit to a hybrid faith-based social entrepreneurial venture.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2018-07-20},\n\tauthor = {Beech, Christine},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Faith-based nonprofit organizations face myriad challenges in securing a sufficient donation base within a restricted pool of donors. This funding challenge often limits their ability to conduct their mission. To offset this challenge and model self-sufficiency, many faith-based organizations are looking to evolve into hybrid platforms that operate as faith-based social entrepreneurial ventures and manage to a triple bottom line of social good, financial impact, and spiritual mission. Yet even with the best of intentions, successfully merging a for-profit business model into a preexisting nonprofit organization often fails, even before the faith-factor is in play. This study of social entrepreneurship in faith-based nonprofits is conducted to identify how and why successful integration of the hybrid business model for sustainable social impact occurs. Using a realist synthesis approach, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the mechanisms that correlated to a positive integration of the disparate business models and the outcome of a sustainable organizational structure. Five organizational characteristics and five management practices were identified as key underlying mechanisms that led to the creation of a successful merged hybrid organization. The five characteristics were 1) Institutional Logic, 2) Motivations and Values, 3) Resources, 4) Decision-Making, and 5) Culture. The five practices were 1) Focus on Launch, 2) Cultivation of Staff and Board, 3) Timing of Culture Integration, 4) Addressing Unstable Structures, and 5) View on Generating Profit. These results, along with their implications for managers are presented and discussed within the context of the Business Model Canvas to offer a usable guide for practitioners seeking to successfully move their organizations from a traditional faith-based nonprofit to a hybrid faith-based social entrepreneurial venture.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Role of the hidden curriculum in faith, learning and living integration processes.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nyamai, D. K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n European Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{nyamai_role_2018,\n\ttitle = {Role of the hidden curriculum in faith, learning and living integration processes},\n\tjournal = {European Journal of Social Sciences Studies},\n\tauthor = {Nyamai, Dinah K.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Learning to Make Good Business Decisions Better-Another Contribution Christian Colleges and Universities Can Make to Improving Business Outcomes.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Harper, L. C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Journal of Business Inquiry, 13(1): 61–69. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{harper_learning_2018,\n\ttitle = {Learning to {Make} {Good} {Business} {Decisions} {Better}-{Another} {Contribution} {Christian} {Colleges} and {Universities} {Can} {Make} to {Improving} {Business} {Outcomes}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Business Inquiry},\n\tauthor = {Harper, Larron C.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {61--69},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Faith in Research: Forging New Ground in Entrepreneurship.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Busenitz, L.; and Lichtenstein, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Academy of Management Perspectives, (ja). 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{busenitz_faith_2018,\n\ttitle = {Faith in {Research}: {Forging} {New} {Ground} in {Entrepreneurship}},\n\tshorttitle = {Faith in {Research}},\n\tnumber = {ja},\n\tjournal = {Academy of Management Perspectives},\n\tauthor = {Busenitz, Lowell and Lichtenstein, Benyamin},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reimagining Christian schools as revelatory communities.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Murison, C. B.; and Benson, D. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Reimagining Christian Education, pages 75–88. Springer, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{murison_reimagining_2018,\n\ttitle = {Reimagining {Christian} schools as revelatory communities},\n\tbooktitle = {Reimagining {Christian} {Education}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer},\n\tauthor = {Murison, Craig B. and Benson, David M.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {75--88},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n How Christian Faith Can Animate Teaching: A Taxonomy of Diverse Approaches.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Glanzer, P. L.; Alleman, N.; and Guthrie, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Christian Faith and University Life, pages 165–192. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"HowPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{glanzer_how_2018,\n\ttitle = {How {Christian} {Faith} {Can} {Animate} {Teaching}: {A} {Taxonomy} of {Diverse} {Approaches}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-319-61743-5 978-3-319-61744-2},\n\tshorttitle = {How {Christian} {Faith} {Can} {Animate} {Teaching}},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-61744-2_10},\n\tabstract = {How do Christian teachers steward both the academy and their faith by integrating their faith tradition into their teaching? This chapter draws upon a survey of 2309 faculty at 48 institutions in the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities to set forth a typology that helps us identify and understand a range of eight different ways teachers apply faith in the classroom. The authors examine potential weaknesses and strengths of various approaches and conclude we need a holistic approach that weaves together the disparate strands that may become weak and tattered when left to themselves. In particular, the authors encourage doctoral students and new faculty to pursue styles that they find the most authentic while maintaining a holistic approach.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2018-07-20},\n\tbooktitle = {Christian {Faith} and {University} {Life}},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave Macmillan, Cham},\n\tauthor = {Glanzer, Perry L. and Alleman, Nathan and Guthrie, David},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-319-61744-2_10},\n\tpages = {165--192},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n How do Christian teachers steward both the academy and their faith by integrating their faith tradition into their teaching? This chapter draws upon a survey of 2309 faculty at 48 institutions in the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities to set forth a typology that helps us identify and understand a range of eight different ways teachers apply faith in the classroom. The authors examine potential weaknesses and strengths of various approaches and conclude we need a holistic approach that weaves together the disparate strands that may become weak and tattered when left to themselves. In particular, the authors encourage doctoral students and new faculty to pursue styles that they find the most authentic while maintaining a holistic approach.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Faith Integration: What Does It Really Look Like?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Shotsberger, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 12(2): 5. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{shotsberger_faith_2018,\n\ttitle = {Faith {Integration}: {What} {Does} {It} {Really} {Look} {Like}?},\n\tvolume = {12},\n\tshorttitle = {Faith {Integration}},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal},\n\tauthor = {Shotsberger, Paul},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {5},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Learning Clinical Integration: A Case Study Approach.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Strawn, B. D.; Bland, E. D.; and Flores, P. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Psychology and Theology, 46(2): 85–97. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{strawn_learning_2018,\n\ttitle = {Learning {Clinical} {Integration}: {A} {Case} {Study} {Approach}},\n\tvolume = {46},\n\tshorttitle = {Learning {Clinical} {Integration}},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Psychology and Theology},\n\tauthor = {Strawn, Brad D. and Bland, Earl D. and Flores, Paul S.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {85--97},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating Faith and Learning in the Western Civilization Classroom.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pardue, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 17(3): 167–174. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pardue_integrating_2018,\n\ttitle = {Integrating {Faith} and {Learning} in the {Western} {Civilization} {Classroom}},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Pardue, Brad},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {167--174},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Combating the Business Manipulator Using Armor of God: Faith Integration Cycle for Ephesians 6: 10-18.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Harrison, A. L.; Geter, S. D.; Kaminski, E.; and LaShaw, M. N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR), 13. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{harrison_combating_2018,\n\ttitle = {Combating the {Business} {Manipulator} {Using} {Armor} of {God}: {Faith} {Integration} {Cycle} for {Ephesians} 6: 10-18.},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tshorttitle = {Combating the {Business} {Manipulator} {Using} {Armor} of {God}},\n\tjournal = {Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR)},\n\tauthor = {Harrison, Adele L. and Geter, Stephanie D. and Kaminski, Ellen and LaShaw, Margie Ness},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Lifelong Learning in Christian Business Education: A Framework and Case Study.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Liang, E. P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR), 13. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{liang_lifelong_2018,\n\ttitle = {Lifelong {Learning} in {Christian} {Business} {Education}: {A} {Framework} and {Case} {Study}.},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tshorttitle = {Lifelong {Learning} in {Christian} {Business} {Education}},\n\tjournal = {Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR)},\n\tauthor = {Liang, Ernest P.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Research Note: On Tracking Faith-Related Student Learning Outcomes in Accredited Christian Business Schools.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wilkerson, J. M.; and Okrepkie, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR), 13. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{wilkerson_research_2018,\n\ttitle = {Research {Note}: {On} {Tracking} {Faith}-{Related} {Student} {Learning} {Outcomes} in {Accredited} {Christian} {Business} {Schools}.},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tshorttitle = {Research {Note}},\n\tjournal = {Christian Business Academy Review (CBAR)},\n\tauthor = {Wilkerson, James M. and Okrepkie, Phyllis},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Fostering Student Faith Development and Integration across the Curriculum: The Andrews University Biology Department Experience.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zdor, R.; Henson, S. M.; Murray, M.; Navia, B.; Wells, R.; and Goodwin, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n . 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{zdor_fostering_2018,\n\ttitle = {Fostering {Student} {Faith} {Development} and {Integration} across the {Curriculum}: {The} {Andrews} {University} {Biology} {Department} {Experience}},\n\tshorttitle = {Fostering {Student} {Faith} {Development} and {Integration} across the {Curriculum}},\n\tauthor = {Zdor, Robert and Henson, Shandelle M. and Murray, Marlene and Navia, Benjamin and Wells, Rahel and Goodwin, Tom},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Integrating Faith and Learning: Charismatic Teaching in General Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Tabone, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@phdthesis{tabone_integrating_2018,\n\ttype = {{PhD} {Thesis}},\n\ttitle = {Integrating {Faith} and {Learning}: {Charismatic} {Teaching} in {General} {Education}},\n\tshorttitle = {Integrating {Faith} and {Learning}},\n\tschool = {Michigan State University},\n\tauthor = {Tabone, Jeffrey},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2017\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Restoring the soul of the university: unifying Christian higher education in a fragmented age.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Glanzer, P. L.; Alleman, N. F.; and Ream, T. C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{glanzer_restoring_2017,\n\taddress = {Downers Grove, IL},\n\ttitle = {Restoring the soul of the university: unifying {Christian} higher education in a fragmented age},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8308-5161-4},\n\tshorttitle = {Restoring the soul of the university},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tpublisher = {InterVarsity Press},\n\tauthor = {Glanzer, Perry L. and Alleman, Nathan F. and Ream, Todd C.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Equipping Students to Have the Mind of Christ.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Longman, K. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 16(4): 197–199. August 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"EquippingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{longman_equipping_2017,\n\ttitle = {Equipping {Students} to {Have} the {Mind} of {Christ}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tissn = {1536-3759},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2017.1337418},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2017.1337418},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Longman, Karen A.},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {197--199},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Predicting Faculty Integration of Faith and Learning.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kaul, C. R.; Hardin, K. A.; and Beaujean, A. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 16(3): 172–187. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"PredictingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kaul_predicting_2017,\n\ttitle = {Predicting {Faculty} {Integration} of {Faith} and {Learning}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\turl = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15363759.2016.1250684},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Kaul, Corina R. and Hardin, Kimberly A. and Beaujean, A. Alexander},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {172--187},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Faith animating learning.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Davis, D. H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FaithPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{davis_faith_2017,\n\ttitle = {Faith animating learning},\n\turl = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056997117704400},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England},\n\tauthor = {Davis, Darin H.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Christian Theology and the Secular University.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n MacDonald, P. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Routledge, 2017.\n Google-Books-ID: QKI0DgAAQBAJ\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{macdonald_christian_2017,\n\ttitle = {Christian {Theology} and the {Secular} {University}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-317-16662-7},\n\tabstract = {If the secular university by definition is non-sectarian or non-denominational, then how can it accommodate a discipline like Christian theology?? Doesn’t the traditional goal of theological study, which is to attain knowledge of the divine, fundamentally conflict with the main goal of secular academic study, which is to attain knowledge about ourselves and the world in which we live?? So why should theology be admitted, or even care about being admitted, into secular academic life? And even if theology were admitted, what contribution to secular academic life could it make?  Working from a Christian philosophical and theological perspective but also engaging a wide range of theologians, philosophers, and religious studies scholars, Christian Theology and the Secular University takes on these questions, arguing that Christian theology does belong in the secular university because it provides distinct resources that the secular university needs if it is going to fulfill what should be its main epistemic and educative ends.? This book offers a fresh and unique perspective to scholars working in the disciplines of theology, philosophy, and religious studies, and to those in other academic disciplines who are interested in thinking critically and creatively about the place and nature of theological study within the secular university.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tpublisher = {Routledge},\n\tauthor = {MacDonald, Paul A.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Google-Books-ID: QKI0DgAAQBAJ},\n\tkeywords = {Religion / Christianity / General, Religion / General},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n If the secular university by definition is non-sectarian or non-denominational, then how can it accommodate a discipline like Christian theology?? Doesn’t the traditional goal of theological study, which is to attain knowledge of the divine, fundamentally conflict with the main goal of secular academic study, which is to attain knowledge about ourselves and the world in which we live?? So why should theology be admitted, or even care about being admitted, into secular academic life? And even if theology were admitted, what contribution to secular academic life could it make? Working from a Christian philosophical and theological perspective but also engaging a wide range of theologians, philosophers, and religious studies scholars, Christian Theology and the Secular University takes on these questions, arguing that Christian theology does belong in the secular university because it provides distinct resources that the secular university needs if it is going to fulfill what should be its main epistemic and educative ends.? This book offers a fresh and unique perspective to scholars working in the disciplines of theology, philosophy, and religious studies, and to those in other academic disciplines who are interested in thinking critically and creatively about the place and nature of theological study within the secular university.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Eastern Orthodox Christianity and American Higher Education: Theological, Historical, and Contemporary Reflections.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bezzerides, A. M.; and Prodromou, E. H.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1 edition edition, 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{bezzerides_eastern_2017,\n\taddress = {Notre Dame},\n\tedition = {1 edition},\n\ttitle = {Eastern {Orthodox} {Christianity} and {American} {Higher} {Education}: {Theological}, {Historical}, and {Contemporary} {Reflections}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-268-10126-8},\n\tshorttitle = {Eastern {Orthodox} {Christianity} and {American} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tabstract = {Over the last two decades, the American academy has engaged in a wide-ranging discourse on faith and learning, religion and higher education, and Christianity and the academy. Eastern Orthodox Christians, however, have rarely participated in these conversations. The contributors to this volume aim to reverse this trend by offering original insights from Orthodox Christian perspectives into the ongoing discussion about religion, higher education, and faith and learning in the United States. The book is divided into two parts. Essays in the first part explore the historical experiences and theological traditions that inform (and sometimes explain) Orthodox approaches to the topic of religion and higher education—in ways that often set them apart from their Protestant and Roman Catholic counterparts. Those in the second part problematize and reflect on Orthodox thought and practice from diverse disciplinary contexts in contemporary higher education. The contributors to this volume offer provocative insights into philosophical questions about the relevance and application of Orthodox ideas in the religious and secular academy, as well as cross-disciplinary treatments of Orthodoxy as an identity marker, pedagogical framework, and teaching and research subject. "Seldom have so many scholars representing such a wide range of disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities (even the hard sciences) been brought together to address the important issue of faith and learning through the prism of various aspects of the Eastern Orthodox tradition. The fact that all but one of these contributors are themselves Orthodox Christian scholars provides ample proof that most likely representatives of Orthodox Christianity will be active participants in the ongoing debate addressing the crucial question of faith and the academy, or Athens and Jerusalem, to borrow Tertullian's much abused epigrammatic description of the phenomenon. Eastern Orthodox Christianity and American Higher Education will be useful to the growing number of classes on Eastern Orthodox history and culture taught in American colleges and universities." —Theofanis G. Stavrou, University of Minnesota},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tpublisher = {University of Notre Dame Press},\n\teditor = {Bezzerides, Ann Mitsakos and Prodromou, Elizabeth H.},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Over the last two decades, the American academy has engaged in a wide-ranging discourse on faith and learning, religion and higher education, and Christianity and the academy. Eastern Orthodox Christians, however, have rarely participated in these conversations. The contributors to this volume aim to reverse this trend by offering original insights from Orthodox Christian perspectives into the ongoing discussion about religion, higher education, and faith and learning in the United States. The book is divided into two parts. Essays in the first part explore the historical experiences and theological traditions that inform (and sometimes explain) Orthodox approaches to the topic of religion and higher education—in ways that often set them apart from their Protestant and Roman Catholic counterparts. Those in the second part problematize and reflect on Orthodox thought and practice from diverse disciplinary contexts in contemporary higher education. The contributors to this volume offer provocative insights into philosophical questions about the relevance and application of Orthodox ideas in the religious and secular academy, as well as cross-disciplinary treatments of Orthodoxy as an identity marker, pedagogical framework, and teaching and research subject. \"Seldom have so many scholars representing such a wide range of disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities (even the hard sciences) been brought together to address the important issue of faith and learning through the prism of various aspects of the Eastern Orthodox tradition. The fact that all but one of these contributors are themselves Orthodox Christian scholars provides ample proof that most likely representatives of Orthodox Christianity will be active participants in the ongoing debate addressing the crucial question of faith and the academy, or Athens and Jerusalem, to borrow Tertullian's much abused epigrammatic description of the phenomenon. Eastern Orthodox Christianity and American Higher Education will be useful to the growing number of classes on Eastern Orthodox history and culture taught in American colleges and universities.\" —Theofanis G. Stavrou, University of Minnesota\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2016\n \n \n (17)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Academic Faith Integration: Introduction to a New Section Within Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kaak, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(4): 189–199. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AcademicPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kaak_academic_2016,\n\ttitle = {Academic {Faith} {Integration}: {Introduction} to a {New} {Section} {Within} {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tshorttitle = {Academic {Faith} {Integration}},\n\turl = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15363759.2016.1187988},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Kaak, Paul},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {189--199},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Integration of Faith and Learning.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jang, Y. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology, 29: 45–67. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IntegrationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{jang_integration_2016,\n\ttitle = {Integration of {Faith} and {Learning}},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\turl = {http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE06673558},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Christian Education \\& Information Technology},\n\tauthor = {Jang, You Jung},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {45--67},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ancient education and early Christianity.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hauge, M. R.,\n editor.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Bloomsbury:, New York, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{hauge_ancient_2016,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\ttitle = {Ancient education and early {Christianity}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-567-66027-5},\n\tpublisher = {Bloomsbury:},\n\teditor = {Hauge, Matthew R.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education, Early church, ca. 30-600, Education, History},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The integration of Christian theological traditions into the classroom: A survey of CCCU faculty.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Alleman, N. F.; Glanzer, P. L.; and Guthrie, D. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Scholar's Review, 45(2): 103. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{alleman_integration_2016,\n\ttitle = {The integration of {Christian} theological traditions into the classroom: {A} survey of {CCCU} faculty},\n\tvolume = {45},\n\tshorttitle = {The integration of {Christian} theological traditions into the classroom},\n\turl = {http://search.proquest.com/openview/2ff99bdd7f04dd105bbbc74c2980f0e4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=48911},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2016-10-19},\n\tjournal = {Christian Scholar's Review},\n\tauthor = {Alleman, Nathan F. and Glanzer, Perry L. and Guthrie, David S.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {103},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n James Clerk Maxwell: A Model for Twenty-first Century Physics in the Christian Liberal Arts.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Whitney, H. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Scholar's Review, 45(4): 345–364. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"JamesHttp://ezproxy.wheaton.edu/login?url\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{whitney_james_2016,\n\ttitle = {James {Clerk} {Maxwell}: {A} {Model} for {Twenty}-first {Century} {Physics} in the {Christian} {Liberal} {Arts}},\n\tvolume = {45},\n\tissn = {00172251},\n\tshorttitle = {James {Clerk} {Maxwell}},\n\turl = {http://ezproxy.wheaton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=116463444&site=ehost-live},\n\tabstract = {Physicist James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) is considered by many to have been as important\nto physics as Newton and Einstein, especially for his work on electricity and magnetism\nand for being the first director of the Cavendish Laboratory. His technical achievements are\nsignificant, but he also offers us a model of the qualities of physics education in a Christian\nliberal arts environment. This work explores his writings and discusses some of his various\nexperiences, such as his broad education at the University of Edinburgh and participation\nin elite intellectual discussion societies, which developed and demonstrated his ability to\nthink broadly. In some instances, he shared about his faith in God and how it informed his\nperspectives. Furthermore, in the inaugural lectures he gave for the three professorships he\nheld over his lifetime, he shared his views on the role that the study of physics can play in\npersonal formation. This paper suggests that his personal and professional examples may be\ncritical qualities to be emulated in today's Christian liberal arts physics programs, as higher\neducation undergoes significant transition.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2016-07-01},\n\tjournal = {Christian Scholar's Review},\n\tauthor = {Whitney, Heather M.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {345--364},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Physicist James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) is considered by many to have been as important to physics as Newton and Einstein, especially for his work on electricity and magnetism and for being the first director of the Cavendish Laboratory. His technical achievements are significant, but he also offers us a model of the qualities of physics education in a Christian liberal arts environment. This work explores his writings and discusses some of his various experiences, such as his broad education at the University of Edinburgh and participation in elite intellectual discussion societies, which developed and demonstrated his ability to think broadly. In some instances, he shared about his faith in God and how it informed his perspectives. Furthermore, in the inaugural lectures he gave for the three professorships he held over his lifetime, he shared his views on the role that the study of physics can play in personal formation. This paper suggests that his personal and professional examples may be critical qualities to be emulated in today's Christian liberal arts physics programs, as higher education undergoes significant transition.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Julian against Christian Educators: Julian and Basil on a Proper Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wayman, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Scholar's Review, 45(3): 249–267. 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{wayman_julian_2016,\n\ttitle = {Julian against {Christian} {Educators}: {Julian} and {Basil} on a {Proper} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {45},\n\tabstract = {Wayman examines pagan and Christian approaches to education in the early Church in his comparison of Saint Basil and the Emperor Julian. The author then moves to show how Arthur Holmes's vison of the Christian liberal arts stands in continuity with Basil's educational philosophy.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Christian Scholar's Review},\n\tauthor = {Wayman, Benjamin},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {FLancient},\n\tpages = {249--267},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Wayman examines pagan and Christian approaches to education in the early Church in his comparison of Saint Basil and the Emperor Julian. The author then moves to show how Arthur Holmes's vison of the Christian liberal arts stands in continuity with Basil's educational philosophy.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Faith and LGBTQ Inclusion: Navigating the Complexities of the Campus Spiritual Climate in Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rockenbach, A. N.; and Crandall, R. E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 62–71. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rockenbach_faith_2016,\n\ttitle = {Faith and {LGBTQ} {Inclusion}: {Navigating} the {Complexities} of the {Campus} {Spiritual} {Climate} in {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Faith and {LGBTQ} {Inclusion}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2015.1106355},\n\tabstract = {In an era of rapid societal change, institutions of higher education are grappling with how to ensure that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals are safe and supported on campus. Many challenges remain as LGBTQ students, faculty, and staff are subject to continued acts of discrimination and subtle microaggressions on a regular basis, according to national assessments of campus climate. When religion and spirituality are salient on campus or in the lived experiences of LGBTQ people, the complexities of faith as it intersects with sexuality and gender identity become increasingly apparent. In this essay, we portray current issues concerning the campus climate in an effort to imagine how Christian higher education leaders might respond in light of institutional aims to promote the spiritual growth of all members of their campus communities.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Rockenbach, Alyssa N. and Crandall, Rebecca E.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education, GENDER identity, HIGHER education, HUMAN sexuality, LGBT people -- Religious life},\n\tpages = {62--71},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In an era of rapid societal change, institutions of higher education are grappling with how to ensure that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals are safe and supported on campus. Many challenges remain as LGBTQ students, faculty, and staff are subject to continued acts of discrimination and subtle microaggressions on a regular basis, according to national assessments of campus climate. When religion and spirituality are salient on campus or in the lived experiences of LGBTQ people, the complexities of faith as it intersects with sexuality and gender identity become increasingly apparent. In this essay, we portray current issues concerning the campus climate in an effort to imagine how Christian higher education leaders might respond in light of institutional aims to promote the spiritual growth of all members of their campus communities.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A Distinctive Vision for the Liberal Arts: General Education and the Flourishing of Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wells, C. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 84–94. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{wells_distinctive_2016,\n\ttitle = {A {Distinctive} {Vision} for the {Liberal} {Arts}: {General} {Education} and the {Flourishing} of {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {A {Distinctive} {Vision} for the {Liberal} {Arts}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1117277},\n\tabstract = {This article argues that a coherent and inspired general education program, infused with a deliberate vision of the liberal arts, is crucial to the flourishing of Christian higher education. This article begins by describing the context and status of general education, emphasizing how this element of the educational program falls short in embodying a distinctive mission of Christian higher education. This article then contends that a vibrant vision of general education will be grounded in particular aspects of a liberal arts education that fulfill crucial outcomes of the Christian university, specifically cultivating the formal virtues and fostering meaning and purpose. The article concludes with recommendations for advancing the aims of general education within Christian higher education, highlighting the benefits of a common curriculum and intentional faculty development.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Wells, Cynthia A.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, Christian education, EDUCATIONAL programs, GENERAL education, HIGHER education},\n\tpages = {84--94},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article argues that a coherent and inspired general education program, infused with a deliberate vision of the liberal arts, is crucial to the flourishing of Christian higher education. This article begins by describing the context and status of general education, emphasizing how this element of the educational program falls short in embodying a distinctive mission of Christian higher education. This article then contends that a vibrant vision of general education will be grounded in particular aspects of a liberal arts education that fulfill crucial outcomes of the Christian university, specifically cultivating the formal virtues and fostering meaning and purpose. The article concludes with recommendations for advancing the aims of general education within Christian higher education, highlighting the benefits of a common curriculum and intentional faculty development.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Pathways to Success for Students of Color in Christian Colleges: The Role of Institutional Integrity and Sense of Community.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ash, A. N.; and Schreiner, L. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 38–61. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ash_pathways_2016,\n\ttitle = {Pathways to {Success} for {Students} of {Color} in {Christian} {Colleges}: {The} {Role} of {Institutional} {Integrity} and {Sense} of {Community}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Pathways to {Success} for {Students} of {Color} in {Christian} {Colleges}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2015.1106356},\n\tabstract = {This study explored the predictors of success among 1,536 students of color from 12 Council for Christian Colleges \\& Universities (CCCU) member institutions. Student success was measured by examining students' intent to graduate along with the degree to which they were thriving intellectually, socially, and psychologically. The study utilized an instrument that included the Thriving Quotient (Schreiner, 2012), which measures students' psychosocial well-being, along with scales that assessed students' psychological sense of community, perceptions of institutional integrity and commitment to student welfare, spirituality, and satisfaction with student–faculty interaction. The path model explained 35\\% of the variation in intent to graduate from their chosen CCCU institution among this sample of students of color. In addition to three factors that directly contributed to students' intent to graduate from their institutions—institutional fit, thriving in their role as students, and students' perceptions of the institutions' commitment to their welfare—the model revealed significant indirect contributors to the success of students of color. Recommendations based on these findings include creating campus environments, policies, and practices that consider the unique needs of all students, equipping faculty for inclusive pedagogy, and delivering on the implicit institutional promises made to students of color during the admissions process.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Ash, Allison N. and Schreiner, Laurie A.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, COLLEGE students -- Research, Education, HIGHER education -- Research, PEOPLE of color, SUCCESS, research},\n\tpages = {38--61},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This study explored the predictors of success among 1,536 students of color from 12 Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (CCCU) member institutions. Student success was measured by examining students' intent to graduate along with the degree to which they were thriving intellectually, socially, and psychologically. The study utilized an instrument that included the Thriving Quotient (Schreiner, 2012), which measures students' psychosocial well-being, along with scales that assessed students' psychological sense of community, perceptions of institutional integrity and commitment to student welfare, spirituality, and satisfaction with student–faculty interaction. The path model explained 35% of the variation in intent to graduate from their chosen CCCU institution among this sample of students of color. In addition to three factors that directly contributed to students' intent to graduate from their institutions—institutional fit, thriving in their role as students, and students' perceptions of the institutions' commitment to their welfare—the model revealed significant indirect contributors to the success of students of color. Recommendations based on these findings include creating campus environments, policies, and practices that consider the unique needs of all students, equipping faculty for inclusive pedagogy, and delivering on the implicit institutional promises made to students of color during the admissions process.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Toward a Future for Christian Higher Education: Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Dockery, D. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 115–119. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{dockery_toward_2016,\n\ttitle = {Toward a {Future} for {Christian} {Higher} {Education}: {Learning} from the {Past}, {Looking} to the {Future}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Toward a {Future} for {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1107349},\n\tabstract = {This article does not attempt to address the many and varied changes currently facing Christian higher education, but seeks to provide a framework for thinking about the future that is grounded in the church's heritage and tradition. Believing that the secular culture is indifferent to the Christian faith and that the Christ world tends to be confused about its heritage and beliefs, the article proposes that the Christian tradition, informed by the Nicene Creed, offers a hopeful way forward. At the heart of Christian higher education is a calling to prepare a new generation of Christians to think Christianly, to engage the culture and the academy, to serve society, and to renew connections with the church and its mission. Contending that limiting Christ-centeredness to the sphere of personal piety or activism is minimalistic and inadequate, the article also suggests that any attempt to envision a faithful Christian higher education for the future that is not tightly tethered to the great Christian tradition will likely result in an education model that lacks a compass. The uniting of the Christian tradition with learning is proposed as the pathway forward for understanding the essence of Christian higher education. In doing so, this article offers a pathway that focuses on the central and foundational commitments needed to sustain a faithful future for Christian higher education.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Dockery, David S.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education, HIGHER education, LEARNING, practical theology, religious education},\n\tpages = {115--119},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article does not attempt to address the many and varied changes currently facing Christian higher education, but seeks to provide a framework for thinking about the future that is grounded in the church's heritage and tradition. Believing that the secular culture is indifferent to the Christian faith and that the Christ world tends to be confused about its heritage and beliefs, the article proposes that the Christian tradition, informed by the Nicene Creed, offers a hopeful way forward. At the heart of Christian higher education is a calling to prepare a new generation of Christians to think Christianly, to engage the culture and the academy, to serve society, and to renew connections with the church and its mission. Contending that limiting Christ-centeredness to the sphere of personal piety or activism is minimalistic and inadequate, the article also suggests that any attempt to envision a faithful Christian higher education for the future that is not tightly tethered to the great Christian tradition will likely result in an education model that lacks a compass. The uniting of the Christian tradition with learning is proposed as the pathway forward for understanding the essence of Christian higher education. In doing so, this article offers a pathway that focuses on the central and foundational commitments needed to sustain a faithful future for Christian higher education.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Women in Leadership: The Future of Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Longman, K. A.; and Anderson, P. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 24–37. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{longman_women_2016,\n\ttitle = {Women in {Leadership}: {The} {Future} of {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Women in {Leadership}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1107339},\n\tabstract = {This article presents a discussion of the gender imbalance in senior-level leadership roles within the U.S. member institutions of the Council for Christian Colleges \\& Universities (CCCU), highlighting data across the last two decades. The underrepresentation of women in this sector is placed within a theological context and is compared with other sectors of U.S. higher education. Insights from the secular literature provide an introductory context for the article's presentation of the data. Although the CCCU member institutions collectively serve a student body that is 60\\% female, a 2015 analysis of individuals holding “vice president” or higher titles (e.g., senior vice president, executive vice president) revealed that women held fewer than 30\\% of those employed in any particular leadership role (e.g., chief academic officer) and only slightly over 20\\% of all senior leadership roles. Notably, when a national study compared the leadership composition of 1,481 evangelical non-profit organizations with their secular counterparts, the representation of women on boards and senior leadership teams was found to be about half of that found in the secular nonprofits (Reynolds, 2014). Although Christian colleges and universities have an opportunity to set the standard within higher education for identifying, encouraging, and deploying the gifts of individuals across racial and gender lines, a variety of environmental and internalized barriers hinder the affirmation and development of women's leadership identity and advancement. Five recommended action steps conclude the article, with a call to reimagine Christian higher education as being places of learning characterized by fully affirming and developing the potential of all within their span of care.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Longman, Karen A. and Anderson, Patricia S.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, Christian education, GENDER, HIGHER education -- Research, Leadership, WOMEN leaders, research},\n\tpages = {24--37},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article presents a discussion of the gender imbalance in senior-level leadership roles within the U.S. member institutions of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (CCCU), highlighting data across the last two decades. The underrepresentation of women in this sector is placed within a theological context and is compared with other sectors of U.S. higher education. Insights from the secular literature provide an introductory context for the article's presentation of the data. Although the CCCU member institutions collectively serve a student body that is 60% female, a 2015 analysis of individuals holding “vice president” or higher titles (e.g., senior vice president, executive vice president) revealed that women held fewer than 30% of those employed in any particular leadership role (e.g., chief academic officer) and only slightly over 20% of all senior leadership roles. Notably, when a national study compared the leadership composition of 1,481 evangelical non-profit organizations with their secular counterparts, the representation of women on boards and senior leadership teams was found to be about half of that found in the secular nonprofits (Reynolds, 2014). Although Christian colleges and universities have an opportunity to set the standard within higher education for identifying, encouraging, and deploying the gifts of individuals across racial and gender lines, a variety of environmental and internalized barriers hinder the affirmation and development of women's leadership identity and advancement. Five recommended action steps conclude the article, with a call to reimagine Christian higher education as being places of learning characterized by fully affirming and developing the potential of all within their span of care.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Future of Residence Life and Student Affairs in Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sriram, R.; and McLevain, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 72–83. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sriram_future_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {Future} of {Residence} {Life} and {Student} {Affairs} in {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2015.1106354},\n\tabstract = {The future of Christian higher education is not certain, and faith-based institutions will need to continue to convince prospective students that the experiences they offer are worth the investment. What is missing in the discussion of what makes Christian higher education special is the transformational experience provided outside of the classroom. To this end, residential life and student affairs in Christian higher education is an area of untapped potential critical to the future of these campuses. When taking into account the lost role of service in the professoriate, the research on the impact of living on campus on student success, and the research on the importance of student-faculty interaction, it becomes evident that residential communities can be transformed into environments that offer an integrated, holistic education that is vital to the mission of Christian institutions.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Sriram, Rishi and McLevain, Melissa},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education, HIGHER education -- Research, RELIGIOUS institutions, STUDENT affairs services, Students, research},\n\tpages = {72--83},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The future of Christian higher education is not certain, and faith-based institutions will need to continue to convince prospective students that the experiences they offer are worth the investment. What is missing in the discussion of what makes Christian higher education special is the transformational experience provided outside of the classroom. To this end, residential life and student affairs in Christian higher education is an area of untapped potential critical to the future of these campuses. When taking into account the lost role of service in the professoriate, the research on the impact of living on campus on student success, and the research on the importance of student-faculty interaction, it becomes evident that residential communities can be transformed into environments that offer an integrated, holistic education that is vital to the mission of Christian institutions.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Steering the Ship through Uncertain Waters: Empirical Analysis and the Future of Evangelical Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rine, P. J.; and Guthrie, D. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 4–23. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rine_steering_2016,\n\ttitle = {Steering the {Ship} through {Uncertain} {Waters}: {Empirical} {Analysis} and the {Future} of {Evangelical} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Steering the {Ship} through {Uncertain} {Waters}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1107347},\n\tabstract = {Leaders of evangelical Christian colleges must navigate a challenging environment shaped by public concern about college costs and educational quality, federal inclinations toward increased regulation, and lingering fallout from the Great Recession. Proceeding from the premise that empirical analysis empowers institutional actors to lead well in uncertain times, this article examines four key areas—access, affordability, student outcomes, and financial sustainability—using publicly available data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Results for the evangelical segment and the wider private nondoctoral sector of American higher education are compared, and areas of relative strength and weakness are considered. To facilitate benchmarking by institutional research professionals, the article's appendix presents national longitudinal norms for both the evangelical segment and the private nondoctoral sector.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Rine, P. Jesse and Guthrie, David S.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, COLLEGE costs, EDUCATIONAL quality, HIGHER education -- Research, POSTSECONDARY education -- Research, research},\n\tpages = {4--23},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Leaders of evangelical Christian colleges must navigate a challenging environment shaped by public concern about college costs and educational quality, federal inclinations toward increased regulation, and lingering fallout from the Great Recession. Proceeding from the premise that empirical analysis empowers institutional actors to lead well in uncertain times, this article examines four key areas—access, affordability, student outcomes, and financial sustainability—using publicly available data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Results for the evangelical segment and the wider private nondoctoral sector of American higher education are compared, and areas of relative strength and weakness are considered. To facilitate benchmarking by institutional research professionals, the article's appendix presents national longitudinal norms for both the evangelical segment and the private nondoctoral sector.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Re-Imagining Christian Higher Education: Hope for the Future.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Schreiner, L. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 1–3. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{schreiner_re-imagining_2016,\n\ttitle = {Re-{Imagining} {Christian} {Higher} {Education}: {Hope} for the {Future}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Re-{Imagining} {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1124713},\n\tabstract = {An introduction to the journal is presented which discusses articles on topics including the underrepresentation of women in positional leadership, the campus spiritual climate for LGBTQ students enrolled in Christian colleges, and the future of Christian higher education.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Schreiner, Laurie A.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education, LGBT students, WOMEN leaders},\n\tpages = {1--3},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n An introduction to the journal is presented which discusses articles on topics including the underrepresentation of women in positional leadership, the campus spiritual climate for LGBTQ students enrolled in Christian colleges, and the future of Christian higher education.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Envisioning the Future of Christian Higher Education: Leadership for Embracing, Engaging, and Executing in a Changing Landscape.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Reynolds, J.; and Wallace, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 106–114. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{reynolds_envisioning_2016,\n\ttitle = {Envisioning the {Future} of {Christian} {Higher} {Education}: {Leadership} for {Embracing}, {Engaging}, and {Executing} in a {Changing} {Landscape}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tshorttitle = {Envisioning the {Future} of {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1107340},\n\tabstract = {The focus of this article centers on three specific themes of disruption that are likely to affect the future of Christian higher education. The first theme examines the juxtaposition of faith-based institutional identity and its influence on a post-modern society. The second theme explores the disaggregation of traditional faculty functions and the impact on student learning and institutional effectiveness. The last theme addresses changing student demographics and the associated expectations of this post-traditional population. The magnitude and complexity of these themes requires dynamic and flexible leadership at the board, administrative, and faculty levels. This article distinguishes between disruptive and technical change, and identifies how each approach impacts the unique social concerns facing faith-based institutions today. The article concludes by proposing new models of institutional collaboration and innovative cultures of learning that will meet the pragmatic need for institutional efficiency and effectiveness.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Reynolds, John and Wallace, Jon},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, Christian education, HIGHER education -- Research, LEARNING, Leadership, RELIGIOUS institutions, research},\n\tpages = {106--114},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The focus of this article centers on three specific themes of disruption that are likely to affect the future of Christian higher education. The first theme examines the juxtaposition of faith-based institutional identity and its influence on a post-modern society. The second theme explores the disaggregation of traditional faculty functions and the impact on student learning and institutional effectiveness. The last theme addresses changing student demographics and the associated expectations of this post-traditional population. The magnitude and complexity of these themes requires dynamic and flexible leadership at the board, administrative, and faculty levels. This article distinguishes between disruptive and technical change, and identifies how each approach impacts the unique social concerns facing faith-based institutions today. The article concludes by proposing new models of institutional collaboration and innovative cultures of learning that will meet the pragmatic need for institutional efficiency and effectiveness.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The History of Theological Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spencer, A. J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 120–121. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{spencer_history_2016,\n\ttitle = {The {History} of {Theological} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2015.1084848},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Spencer, Andrew J.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {GONZALEZ, Justo, HISTORY of Theological Education, The (Book), NONFICTION, THEOLOGY -- Study \\& teaching},\n\tpages = {120--121},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reimagining Christian Higher Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hulme, E. E.; Groom, D. E.; and Heltzel, J. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 15(1/2): 95–105. January 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{hulme_reimagining_2016,\n\ttitle = {Reimagining {Christian} {Higher} {Education}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tissn = {15363759},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/15363759.2016.1107348},\n\tabstract = {The challenges facing higher education continue to mount. The shifting of the U.S. ethnic and racial demographics, the proliferation of advanced digital technologies and data, and the move from traditional degrees to continuous learning platforms have created an unstable environment to which Christian higher education must adapt in order to remain viable and ultimately to thrive. Courageous leadership is needed to confront a mindset of scarcity and address the resistance created by a tendency to protect the status quo. By challenging existing assumptions and searching for deep, adaptive solutions, Christian colleges and universities can maintain their unique distinctive as they reimagine their approach to education. This article ends with an imaginative look at the future of faith-based higher education.},\n\tnumber = {1/2},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Hulme, E. Eileen and Groom, David E. and Heltzel, Joseph M.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {CHRISTIAN universities \\& colleges, Christian education, DIGITAL technology, HIGHER education, LEARNING, UNITED States, research},\n\tpages = {95--105},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The challenges facing higher education continue to mount. The shifting of the U.S. ethnic and racial demographics, the proliferation of advanced digital technologies and data, and the move from traditional degrees to continuous learning platforms have created an unstable environment to which Christian higher education must adapt in order to remain viable and ultimately to thrive. Courageous leadership is needed to confront a mindset of scarcity and address the resistance created by a tendency to protect the status quo. By challenging existing assumptions and searching for deep, adaptive solutions, Christian colleges and universities can maintain their unique distinctive as they reimagine their approach to education. This article ends with an imaginative look at the future of faith-based higher education.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2015\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The History of Theological Education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n González, J. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Abingdon Press, Nashville, March 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{gonzalez_history_2015,\n\taddress = {Nashville},\n\ttitle = {The {History} of {Theological} {Education}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4267-8191-9},\n\tabstract = {Theological education has always been vital to the Church’s life and mission; yet today it is in crisis, lacking focus, direction, but also resources and even students. In the early Church, there is no doubt that to lead worship one had to be able to read and interpret the Bible. In order to lead, it was necessary to know at least something about the history of Israel and the work of God in the Gospels, and interpret that history, making it relevant to daily living. Quickly the Church developed schools for its teachers, whether lay or clergy. A catechetical system was organized through which candidates prepared for baptism were given a basic form of theological education. Hence to be a Christian meant persons knew what and why they believed. But over the years, theological education has come to mean education for clergy and church professionals. It has drifted, seeking new moorings.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tpublisher = {Abingdon Press},\n\tauthor = {González, Justo L.},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Theological education has always been vital to the Church’s life and mission; yet today it is in crisis, lacking focus, direction, but also resources and even students. In the early Church, there is no doubt that to lead worship one had to be able to read and interpret the Bible. In order to lead, it was necessary to know at least something about the history of Israel and the work of God in the Gospels, and interpret that history, making it relevant to daily living. Quickly the Church developed schools for its teachers, whether lay or clergy. A catechetical system was organized through which candidates prepared for baptism were given a basic form of theological education. Hence to be a Christian meant persons knew what and why they believed. But over the years, theological education has come to mean education for clergy and church professionals. It has drifted, seeking new moorings.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Whose faith? Faith integration for postmodern Christian business students.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n McMahone, M.; Locke, L. G.; and Roller, R. H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Business Academy Review, 10. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WhosePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{mcmahone_whose_2015,\n\ttitle = {Whose faith? {Faith} integration for postmodern {Christian} business students},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tshorttitle = {Whose faith?},\n\turl = {http://cbfa-cbar.org/index.php/cbar/article/view/25},\n\turldate = {2016-10-19},\n\tjournal = {Christian Business Academy Review},\n\tauthor = {McMahone, Marty and Locke, Larry G. and Roller, Robert H.},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Christian Higher Education at the start of the 21st century: A review essay.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Johnstone, D. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Christian Higher Education, 14(3): 177–181. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ChristianPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{johnstone_christian_2015,\n\ttitle = {Christian {Higher} {Education} at the start of the 21st century: {A} review essay},\n\tvolume = {14},\n\tshorttitle = {Christian {Higher} {Education} at the start of the 21st century},\n\turl = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15363759.2015.1015896},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2016-10-19},\n\tjournal = {Christian Higher Education},\n\tauthor = {Johnstone, David M.},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {177--181},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Will the Real Nurse Please Stand Up? Improving Nursing's Image Through Faith-Learning Integration.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hargate, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Christian Nursing, 32(3): E27–E31. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WillPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{hargate_will_2015,\n\ttitle = {Will the {Real} {Nurse} {Please} {Stand} {Up}? {Improving} {Nursing}'s {Image} {Through} {Faith}-{Learning} {Integration}},\n\tvolume = {32},\n\tshorttitle = {Will the {Real} {Nurse} {Please} {Stand} {Up}?},\n\turl = {http://journals.lww.com/journalofchristiannursing/_layouts/15/oaks.journals.mobile/articleviewer.aspx?year=2015&issue=07000&article=00024},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2016-10-19},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Christian Nursing},\n\tauthor = {Hargate, Carol},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {E27--E31},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Integration of faith and mathematics from the perspectives of truth, beauty, and goodness.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wilson, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 67(2): 100–110. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IntegrationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{wilson_integration_2015,\n\ttitle = {Integration of faith and mathematics from the perspectives of truth, beauty, and goodness},\n\tvolume = {67},\n\turl = {http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/2015/PSCF6-15Wilson.pdf},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2016-10-19},\n\tjournal = {Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith},\n\tauthor = {Wilson, Jason},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {100--110},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The administrative role of the academic dean in the integration of faith and learning in Christian higher education.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jang, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@phdthesis{jang_administrative_2015,\n\ttitle = {The administrative role of the academic dean in the integration of faith and learning in {Christian} higher education},\n\turl = {http://gradworks.umi.com/36/62/3662867.html},\n\turldate = {2015-11-16},\n\tschool = {SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY},\n\tauthor = {Jang, Kyumin},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Program for Persistent Integration of Faith and Learning in A Christian University Online Environment.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Norris, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, October 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@phdthesis{norris_program_2015,\n\ttype = {D. {Min}. project},\n\ttitle = {A {Program} for {Persistent} {Integration} of {Faith} and {Learning} in {A} {Christian} {University} {Online} {Environment}},\n\turl = {http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1067},\n\tauthor = {Norris, John},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Encyclopedia of Christian education.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kurian, G. T.; and Lamport, M. A.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{kurian_encyclopedia_2015,\n\taddress = {Lanham, Maryland},\n\ttitle = {Encyclopedia of {Christian} education},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8108-8492-2},\n\tpublisher = {Rowman \\& Littlefield},\n\teditor = {Kurian, George Thomas and Lamport, Mark A.},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Christian education},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Teaching and Learning Theology and Religion at the University of Botswana.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Togarasei, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Teaching Theology & Religion, 18(3): 271–275. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TeachingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{togarasei_teaching_2015,\n\ttitle = {Teaching and {Learning} {Theology} and {Religion} at the {University} of {Botswana}},\n\tvolume = {18},\n\tcopyright = {© 2015 John Wiley \\& Sons Ltd},\n\tissn = {1467-9647},\n\turl = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/teth.12294/abstract},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/teth.12294},\n\tabstract = {This essay is part of a collection of short essays solicited from authors around the globe who teach religion courses at the college level (not for professional religious training). They are published together with an introduction in Teaching Theology and Religion 18:3 (July 2015). The authors were asked to provide a brief overview of the curriculum, student learning goals, and pedagogical techniques employed in their courses.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2015-09-30},\n\tjournal = {Teaching Theology \\& Religion},\n\tauthor = {Togarasei, Lovemore},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {271--275},\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This essay is part of a collection of short essays solicited from authors around the globe who teach religion courses at the college level (not for professional religious training). They are published together with an introduction in Teaching Theology and Religion 18:3 (July 2015). The authors were asked to provide a brief overview of the curriculum, student learning goals, and pedagogical techniques employed in their courses.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Pietist vision of Christian higher education: forming whole and holy persons.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gehrz, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{gehrz_pietist_2015,\n\ttitle = {The {Pietist} vision of {Christian} higher education: forming whole and holy persons},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8308-4071-7 0-8308-4071-0},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Pietist} vision of {Christian} higher education},\n\tabstract = {"In this groundbreaking volume edited by Christopher Gehrz, scholars associated with the Pietist tradition reflect on the Pietist approach to education. Pietism sees the Christian college as a place that forms whole and holy persons. In a pluralistic and polarized society, such a vision is needed now more than ever, not just for those of the Pietist tradition but also for the wider church." -- Back Cover},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tauthor = {Gehrz, Christopher},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"In this groundbreaking volume edited by Christopher Gehrz, scholars associated with the Pietist tradition reflect on the Pietist approach to education. Pietism sees the Christian college as a place that forms whole and holy persons. In a pluralistic and polarized society, such a vision is needed now more than ever, not just for those of the Pietist tradition but also for the wider church.\" – Back Cover\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);