var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbeta.krisyu.org%2Fkrisyu.bib&jsonp=1&theme=mila&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbeta.krisyu.org%2Fkrisyu.bib&jsonp=1&theme=mila\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbeta.krisyu.org%2Fkrisyu.bib&jsonp=1&theme=mila\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
    2. \n
  2. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
    3. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2024\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The obligatory boundary tone hypothesis and prosodic typology.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Yu, K. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024, pages 1–5, 2024. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"The local pdf\n  \n \n \n \"The paper\n  \n \n \n \"The web\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
@inproceedings{yu24_sp24_obligatory,\n  title={The obligatory boundary tone hypothesis and prosodic typology},\n  author={Yu, Kristine M.},\n  booktitle={Proceedings of {S}peech {P}rosody 2024},\n  year={2024},\n  pages={1--5},\n  doi={10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-1},\n  url_local_pdf = {./papers/yu24_oblig_boundary_tone_hypothesis_sp24.pdf},\n  url_paper = {https://www.isca-archive.org/speechprosody_2024/yu24_speechprosody.pdf},\n  url_web = {https://www.isca-archive.org/speechprosody_2024/yu24_speechprosody.html},\n  abstract = {Two observations about the relationship between sound patterns in the phonological grammar of a language were foundational in motivating the proposal of a prosodic hierarchy with trees defined over phonological constituents in the 1980s: (i) sets of multiple, disparate patterns—suprasegmental and segmental, the application of phonotactic restrictions and processes— cluster together over domains; (ii) the patterns are in containment relationships, whereby the distribution of (non)application of one process invariably implies the (non)application of others. However, work on prosodic and intonational phonology in the past decades has raised doubts about the universality of clustering and containment. At the same time, we argue that Autosegmental-Metrical analyses of intonational phonology have slipped into narrowing the scope of sound patterns used to motivate phonological constituents to the distribution of prosodic boundary tones. We explore the consequences of the strong hypothesis that a span of segmental material is a phono- logical constituent if and only if it is delimited by at least one boundary tone. We show that clustering and containment can be understood to be at least partially respected under this hypothesis. But adopting it might also lead us to miss diversity in the organization of phonological patterns of natural language.}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Two observations about the relationship between sound patterns in the phonological grammar of a language were foundational in motivating the proposal of a prosodic hierarchy with trees defined over phonological constituents in the 1980s: (i) sets of multiple, disparate patterns—suprasegmental and segmental, the application of phonotactic restrictions and processes— cluster together over domains; (ii) the patterns are in containment relationships, whereby the distribution of (non)application of one process invariably implies the (non)application of others. However, work on prosodic and intonational phonology in the past decades has raised doubts about the universality of clustering and containment. At the same time, we argue that Autosegmental-Metrical analyses of intonational phonology have slipped into narrowing the scope of sound patterns used to motivate phonological constituents to the distribution of prosodic boundary tones. We explore the consequences of the strong hypothesis that a span of segmental material is a phono- logical constituent if and only if it is delimited by at least one boundary tone. We show that clustering and containment can be understood to be at least partially respected under this hypothesis. But adopting it might also lead us to miss diversity in the organization of phonological patterns of natural language.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Prosodic variability in marking remote past in African American English.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024, pages 1065–1069, 2024. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Prosodic local pdf\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n 
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n    
\n  
\n\n\n\n\n  
\n\n\n  \n\n  \n  \n  \n  \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);