var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fnetwork%2Ffiles%2FRiCTERkRtwCiG3wWR&jsonp=1&noBootstrap=1&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fnetwork%2Ffiles%2FRiCTERkRtwCiG3wWR&jsonp=1&noBootstrap=1\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fnetwork%2Ffiles%2FRiCTERkRtwCiG3wWR&jsonp=1&noBootstrap=1\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
  2. \n
  3. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
  4. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2024\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Displayed monologues: Speech beyond the typical speaker-addressee dyad in Aboriginal Australia.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n International journal of language and culture. 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{0b2705c2f6e0441c8f5d18682f9cf5f3,  title     = "Displayed monologues: Speech beyond the typical speaker-addressee dyad in Aboriginal Australia",  abstract  = "Many of the ancestral languages of Australia{\\textquoteright}s 250+ Aboriginal cultures employ extensive avoidance registers used in speech situations involving community members with whom one is prohibited from interacting under local cultural laws, so called 'avoidance relatives'. The main function of an avoidance register is to signal that the speaker is *not* addressing the avoidance relative directly, as they would do in regular conversation. I refer to this speech practice as 'displayed monologue'.The present study provides a first detailed description of an avoidance register called Yalan, traditionally spoken by the Ngarinyin Aborinal people of Western Australia. It presents several aspects of Yalan that are not commonly given much prominence in the wider literature on Aboriginal avoidance speech and analyses it as a radical, but predictable, variation on the speaker-addressee dyadic model. I argue that examining phenomena like displayed monologue helps to better understand the dialogic nature of language.",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2024",  language  = "English",  journal   = "International journal of language and culture",  issn      = "2214-3165",  publisher = "John Benjamins", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Many of the ancestral languages of Australia\\textquoterights 250+ Aboriginal cultures employ extensive avoidance registers used in speech situations involving community members with whom one is prohibited from interacting under local cultural laws, so called 'avoidance relatives'. The main function of an avoidance register is to signal that the speaker is *not* addressing the avoidance relative directly, as they would do in regular conversation. I refer to this speech practice as 'displayed monologue'.The present study provides a first detailed description of an avoidance register called Yalan, traditionally spoken by the Ngarinyin Aborinal people of Western Australia. It presents several aspects of Yalan that are not commonly given much prominence in the wider literature on Aboriginal avoidance speech and analyses it as a radical, but predictable, variation on the speaker-addressee dyadic model. I argue that examining phenomena like displayed monologue helps to better understand the dialogic nature of language.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Pragmatics and stance.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley, United States, 2nd Edition edition, 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{81460521a2584bebba1c7c1d229cdf02,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics},\r\n  publisher = {Wiley},\r\n  title     = {Pragmatics and stance},\r\n  year      = {2024},\r\n  address   = {United States},\r\n  edition   = {2nd Edition},\r\n  isbn      = {978-1-4051-9473-0},\r\n  abstract  = {This entry examines stance, here defined as those aspects of language that reveal features of individual experience and ways of relating to the world and others. Stance imbues every human (communicative) act, but is also associated with a range of dedicated linguistic expressions, which makes it particularly challenging to delimit the phenomenon in a cross-theoretical and cross-linguistically uncontroversial fashion. This is where pragmatics comes in: an explicit pragmatic theory is required to identify and motivate relevant semantic and notional categorizations in the linguistic analysis of stance.},\r\n  doi       = {10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0944.pub2},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This entry examines stance, here defined as those aspects of language that reveal features of individual experience and ways of relating to the world and others. Stance imbues every human (communicative) act, but is also associated with a range of dedicated linguistic expressions, which makes it particularly challenging to delimit the phenomenon in a cross-theoretical and cross-linguistically uncontroversial fashion. This is where pragmatics comes in: an explicit pragmatic theory is required to identify and motivate relevant semantic and notional categorizations in the linguistic analysis of stance.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Trees Above: A Language-Based Analysis of Tree Agency in Two Indigenous Societies.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; and Si, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Ethnobiology. 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{b15a63033b4d406a893c1e237a723c2d,  title     = "The Trees Above: A Language-Based Analysis of Tree Agency in Two Indigenous Societies",  abstract  = "We adopt an ethnolinguistic approach to examine cultural practices involving trees in two Indigenous communities: the Ngarinyin Aborigines of Australia and the Solega/Soliga of India. On the basis of two separate types of data and methods we demonstrate that the lives of the Ngarinyin and Solega are intimately connected with the trees surrounding them. Mentions of trees in Ngarinyin creation narratives are numerous and varied, and show that trees perform specific functions in the narrative. They display various degrees of agency, but are rarely represented as entirely passive objects. From signalling the specific location of a scene (similar to the 'placehood' of trees attested elsewhere) to signalling clan affiliations, or even as a source for, e.g., spears, trees in stories engage actively with the (other) protagonists. Data from Solega ethnographic interviews also reveals the local importance of trees: individual trees may be given proper names, tree names often appear in place names, and at least one very ancient tree is worshipped as a deity. The latter is the result of an association of the tree with the Hindu god Shiva, which echoes he commonly-observed reverence for trees associated with divine beings in the rest of India. Our findings tie in with the observations about the roles of trees in Indigenous cultures, who highlight the animacy of trees.",  keywords  = "5200 Other social sciences",  author    = "Stef Spronck and Aung Si",  year      = "2024",  doi       = "10.1177/02780771241278088",  language  = "English",  journal   = "Journal of Ethnobiology",  issn      = "0278-0771",  publisher = "Society of Ethnobiology", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n We adopt an ethnolinguistic approach to examine cultural practices involving trees in two Indigenous communities: the Ngarinyin Aborigines of Australia and the Solega/Soliga of India. On the basis of two separate types of data and methods we demonstrate that the lives of the Ngarinyin and Solega are intimately connected with the trees surrounding them. Mentions of trees in Ngarinyin creation narratives are numerous and varied, and show that trees perform specific functions in the narrative. They display various degrees of agency, but are rarely represented as entirely passive objects. From signalling the specific location of a scene (similar to the 'placehood' of trees attested elsewhere) to signalling clan affiliations, or even as a source for, e.g., spears, trees in stories engage actively with the (other) protagonists. Data from Solega ethnographic interviews also reveals the local importance of trees: individual trees may be given proper names, tree names often appear in place names, and at least one very ancient tree is worshipped as a deity. The latter is the result of an association of the tree with the Hindu god Shiva, which echoes he commonly-observed reverence for trees associated with divine beings in the rest of India. Our findings tie in with the observations about the roles of trees in Indigenous cultures, who highlight the animacy of trees.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2023\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The Grammar of Thinking: From Reported Speech to Reported Thought in the Languages of the World.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Casartelli, D.; Cruschina, S.; Posio, P.; and Spronck, S.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]De Gruyter Mouton, Germany, September 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{c03b24a326ae4c6b85edb2d02587cb05,  title     = "The Grammar of Thinking: From Reported Speech to Reported Thought in the Languages of the World",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  editor    = "Casartelli, {Daniela Elisabetta} and Silvio Cruschina and Pekka Posio and Stef Spronck",  year      = "2023",  month     = sep,  day       = "5",  doi       = "10.1515/9783111065830",  language  = "English",  isbn      = "978-3-11-106550-2",  series    = "Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]",  publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",  address   = "Germany", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grammatical participation: A dialogue-first account of grammatical categories.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Conceptual Foundations of Language ScienceLanguage Science Press, Germany, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{47dedb37e7a4445880d1a2715c827772,  title     = "Grammatical participation: A dialogue-first account of grammatical categories",  abstract  = "This volume argues that the notion of participation is fundamental to language and grammar at any level of analysis: not only in the Goffmanian sense of participatory frameworks in conversation, but for the basic characterisation of every known grammatical category. In developing this argument it proposes novel solutions for longstanding linguistic debates around the relation between contextualised speech and grammatical structures, the value of spontaneous speech versus elicited/written data and the difference between basic grammatical categories such as argument structure and clause types as opposed to indexing and expressive categories relating to epistemicity, stance and information structure. The volume also sketches a theory for fully integrating participation into grammatical description and suggests that this theory may help unify approaches to language as diverse as Interactional Linguistics, functional grammar and generative cartographic syntax.",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2023",  language  = "English",  series    = "Conceptual Foundations of Language Science",  publisher = "Language Science Press",  address   = "Germany", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This volume argues that the notion of participation is fundamental to language and grammar at any level of analysis: not only in the Goffmanian sense of participatory frameworks in conversation, but for the basic characterisation of every known grammatical category. In developing this argument it proposes novel solutions for longstanding linguistic debates around the relation between contextualised speech and grammatical structures, the value of spontaneous speech versus elicited/written data and the difference between basic grammatical categories such as argument structure and clause types as opposed to indexing and expressive categories relating to epistemicity, stance and information structure. The volume also sketches a theory for fully integrating participation into grammatical description and suggests that this theory may help unify approaches to language as diverse as Interactional Linguistics, functional grammar and generative cartographic syntax.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n How to describe reported speech across languages: On diverging research traditions, untangling related notions and problems of definition.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Spronck, S., editor(s), Reported speech: New field- and corpus-based studies. Language Science Press, Germany, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{184789a3fd6e41d9a1a258bc295e98ac,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Reported speech: New field- and corpus-based studies},\r\n  publisher = {Language Science Press},\r\n  title     = {How to describe reported speech across languages: On diverging research traditions, untangling related notions and problems of definition},\r\n  year      = {2023},\r\n  address   = {Germany},\r\n  editor    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Casartelli, D.; Cruschina, S.; Posio, P.; and Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Casartelli, D.; Cruschina, S.; Posio, P.; and Spronck, S., editor(s), The grammar of thinking, of Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, pages 1–14. De Gruyter Mouton, Germany, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{329a81138a844959bb85a51cebd76128,\r\n  author    = {Casartelli, {Daniela E.} and Silvio Cruschina and Pekka Posio and Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {The grammar of thinking},\r\n  publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton},\r\n  title     = {Introduction},\r\n  year      = {2023},\r\n  address   = {Germany},\r\n  editor    = {Casartelli, {Daniela E.} and Silvio Cruschina and Pekka Posio and Stef Spronck},\r\n  isbn      = {978-3-11-106550-2},\r\n  pages     = {1--14},\r\n  series    = {Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs},\r\n  doi       = {10.1515/9783111065830-001},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Languages of the Kimberley region.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bowern, C., editor(s), The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages, pages 812–824. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{65b26e142c14421c925fe991d2fa1f53,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages},\r\n  publisher = {Oxford University Press},\r\n  title     = {Languages of the Kimberley region},\r\n  year      = {2023},\r\n  address   = {United Kingdom},\r\n  editor    = {Claire Bowern},\r\n  isbn      = {978-0-19-882497-8},\r\n  pages     = {812–824},\r\n  doi       = {10.1093/oso/9780198824978.003.0069},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Negation in Ungarinyin.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Miestamo, M.; and Veselinova, L., editor(s), Negation in the languages of the world. Language Science Press, Germany, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{f173cb1dae124a09beb6b87ab9a47f9a,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Negation in the languages of the world},\r\n  publisher = {Language Science Press},\r\n  title     = {Negation in Ungarinyin},\r\n  year      = {2023},\r\n  address   = {Germany},\r\n  editor    = {Matti Miestamo and Ljuba Veselinova},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reported speech - New field- and corpus-based studies.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.,\n editor.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Studies in Diversity LinguisticsLanguage Science Press, Germany, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{83b56d3d7cf641a686c9047c7a09d18f,  title     = "Reported speech - New field- and corpus-based studies",  editor    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2023",  language  = "English",  series    = "Studies in Diversity Linguistics",  publisher = "Language Science Press",  address   = "Germany", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Valency change and causation.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bowern, C., editor(s), The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages, pages 344–359. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{777205bea8f44c2ebf7a9c617f77f150,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages},\r\n  publisher = {Oxford University Press},\r\n  title     = {Valency change and causation},\r\n  year      = {2023},\r\n  address   = {United Kingdom},\r\n  editor    = {Claire Bowern},\r\n  isbn      = {978-0-19-882497-8},\r\n  pages     = {344–359},\r\n  doi       = {10.1093/oso/9780198824978.003.0030},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2022\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Quotations and quotatives.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Greenberg, M.; Grenoble, L.; Dickey, S.; Genis, R.; Łaziński, M.; Oslon, M.; Peti-Stantić, A.; Ueda Fidler, M.; Uhlik, M.; Wiemer, B.; and Zorixina-Nilsson, N., editor(s), Encyclopedia of Slavic Language and Linguistics. Brill, Netherlands, 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{a2b354b290c743d4a05886c261bb479e,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Slavic Language and Linguistics},\r\n  publisher = {Brill},\r\n  title     = {Quotations and quotatives},\r\n  year      = {2022},\r\n  address   = {Netherlands},\r\n  editor    = {Greenberg, {Marc L.} and {Grenoble }, {Lenore A. } and Dickey, {Stephen M. } and Ren{\\'e} Genis and Marek {\\L}azi{\\'n}ski and Mikhail Oslon and Peti-Stanti{\\'c}, {Anita } and {Ueda Fidler}, {Masako } and Uhlik, { Mladen} and Wiemer, {Bj{\\"o}rn } and Zorixina-Nilsson, {Nade{\\v z}da V. }},\r\n  abstract  = {This chapter introduces quotation (more precisely, direct and indirect speech) and quotatives in Slavic. The second category is defined here as a variety of strategies presenting a reported message as an utterance spoken or thought at a moment other than the current moment of speech, but formulated in the here-and-now by the current speaker and often signalled through particles. The chapter discusses several different approaches to these phenomena and illustrates them using corpus examples. It concludes with three complications in the classification and analysis of quotation and quotatives.},\r\n  doi       = {10.1163/2589-6229_eslo_com_032182},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages, Slavic languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This chapter introduces quotation (more precisely, direct and indirect speech) and quotatives in Slavic. The second category is defined here as a variety of strategies presenting a reported message as an utterance spoken or thought at a moment other than the current moment of speech, but formulated in the here-and-now by the current speaker and often signalled through particles. The chapter discusses several different approaches to these phenomena and illustrates them using corpus examples. It concludes with three complications in the classification and analysis of quotation and quotatives.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2021\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n In a manner of speaking: how reported speech may have shaped grammar.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; and Casartelli, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Frontiers in Communication, 6. September 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a606f254611a4f0fb98cb99b9ed97dde,  title     = "In a manner of speaking: how reported speech may have shaped grammar",  abstract  = "We present a first, broad-scale typology of extended reported speech, examples of lexicalised or grammaticalised reported speech constructions without a regular quotation meaning. These typically include meanings that are conceptually close to reported speech, such as think or want, but also interpretations that do not appear to have an obvious conceptual relation with talking, such as cause or begin to. Reported speech may therefore reflect both concepts of communication and inner worlds, and meanings reminiscent of 'core grammar', such as evidentiality, modality, aspect (relational) tense and clause linking. We contextualise our findings in the literature on fictive interaction and perspective and suggest that extended reported speech may lend insight into a fundamental aspect of grammar: the evolution of verbal categories. Based on the striking similarity between the meanings of extended reported speech and grammatical categories, we hypothesise that the phenomenon represents a plausible linguistic context in which grammar evolved.",  keywords  = "6121 Languages, reported speech, quotation, perspective, TAME, fictive interaction, evolution of language, linguistic typology, PERSPECTIVE PERSISTENCE, DISCOURSE, SHIFTS, SAY",  author    = "Stef Spronck and Casartelli, {Daniela Elisabetta}",  year      = "2021",  month     = sep,  day       = "7",  doi       = "10.3389/fcomm.2021.624486",  language  = "English",  volume    = "6",  journal   = "Frontiers in Communication",  issn      = "2297-900X",  publisher = "Frontiers Media SA", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n We present a first, broad-scale typology of extended reported speech, examples of lexicalised or grammaticalised reported speech constructions without a regular quotation meaning. These typically include meanings that are conceptually close to reported speech, such as think or want, but also interpretations that do not appear to have an obvious conceptual relation with talking, such as cause or begin to. Reported speech may therefore reflect both concepts of communication and inner worlds, and meanings reminiscent of 'core grammar', such as evidentiality, modality, aspect (relational) tense and clause linking. We contextualise our findings in the literature on fictive interaction and perspective and suggest that extended reported speech may lend insight into a fundamental aspect of grammar: the evolution of verbal categories. Based on the striking similarity between the meanings of extended reported speech and grammatical categories, we hypothesise that the phenomenon represents a plausible linguistic context in which grammar evolved.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2020\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Grammar and levels of addressivity: Exploring Ungarinyin engagement.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Open Linguistics, 6(1): 1–18. January 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{3ef6a78f82bd4d468b9a07b9d6d49acb,  title     = "Grammar and levels of addressivity: Exploring Ungarinyin engagement",  abstract  = "Evans et al. (2018a,b) introduce the notion of 'engagement' as a new grammatical domain related to intersubjective coordination of knowledge. The present paper applies this notion to data from the Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin. It identifies three markers/construction types in the language as expressions of engagement and develops a descriptive framework rooted in Bakhtinian Dialogism in order to demonstrate why these expressions represent the category. It is argued that the main problems that arise in the analysis of engagement are very similar to those that have been encountered in the description of (other) TAME-categories as well, and that these may be overcome by applying Mikhail Bakhtin's idea of 'addressivity'. It concludes that a better understanding of the category of engagement that explores its relation to addressivity may contribute to the development of an approach to grammar in which sociality takes priority, a Dialogic linguistics.",  keywords  = "Dialogic linguistics, Ungarinyin, epistemicity, intersubjectivity, 6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2020",  month     = jan,  doi       = "10.1515/opli-2020-0001",  language  = "English",  volume    = "6",  pages     = "1--18",  journal   = "Open Linguistics",  issn      = "2300-9969",  publisher = "De Gruyter Open Ltd.",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Evans et al. (2018a,b) introduce the notion of 'engagement' as a new grammatical domain related to intersubjective coordination of knowledge. The present paper applies this notion to data from the Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin. It identifies three markers/construction types in the language as expressions of engagement and develops a descriptive framework rooted in Bakhtinian Dialogism in order to demonstrate why these expressions represent the category. It is argued that the main problems that arise in the analysis of engagement are very similar to those that have been encountered in the description of (other) TAME-categories as well, and that these may be overcome by applying Mikhail Bakhtin's idea of 'addressivity'. It concludes that a better understanding of the category of engagement that explores its relation to addressivity may contribute to the development of an approach to grammar in which sociality takes priority, a Dialogic linguistics.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Functions of Language: Notes from the field on perspective-indexing constructions: Irregular shifts and perspective persistence.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; Van linden, A.; Gentens, C.; and Sansiñena, M.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Functions in Language John Benjamins, International, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{31b0155956a74c7e8efb51d086744a0e,  title     = "Functions of Language: Notes from the field on perspective-indexing constructions: Irregular shifts and perspective persistence",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  editor    = "Stef Spronck and {Van linden}, An and Caroline Gentens and Sansi{\\~n}ena, {Maria Sol}",  year      = "2020",  doi       = "10.1075/fol.27.1",  language  = "English",  series    = "Functions in Language ",  publisher = "John Benjamins",  number    = "1",  address   = "International", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Perspective persistence and irregular perspective shift: mismatches in form-function pairings.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; Van linden, A.; Gentens, C.; and Sansiñena, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Functions of Language, 27(1): 1–6. 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{f44cba7c2a2c490f8d3182bc71795511,  title     = "Perspective persistence and irregular perspective shift: mismatches in form-function pairings",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck and {Van linden}, An and Caroline Gentens and Sansi{\\~n}ena, {Mar{\\'i}a Sol}",  year      = "2020",  doi       = "10.1075/fol.20005.spr",  language  = "English",  volume    = "27",  pages     = "1--6",  journal   = "Functions of Language",  issn      = "0929-998X",  publisher = "John Benjamins",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reported speech: A typological questionnaire.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report TulQuest, France, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@techreport{6927ff665c434d419bcaf4295876df89,  title       = "Reported speech: A typological questionnaire",  abstract    = "The goal of this questionnaire is to classify various grammatical and discourse phenomena associated with reported speech. The topics covered in the questionnaire relate to ongoing discussions on reported speech in the typological literature, but authors completing the questionnaire are encouraged to primarily focus on those topics that they deem most appropriate for their specific data type and language.Data collected through the questionnaire are not projected to constitute a maximally comparable typological data set of features. Rather, the corpus of examples and analyses constructed through the completed questionnaires is intended to show the breadth and variability of the phenomenon of reported speech across languages.The questionnaire was distributed among contributors to an edited volume of fieldwork- and corpus-based studies on reported speech (publication planned for 2022), with the aim of maximising the coverage of phenomena in the volume and prompting various analytical judgements about pragmatic and grammatical aspects of reported speech encountered by the authors.",  keywords    = "6121 Languages",  author      = "Stef Spronck",  year        = "2020",  language    = "English",  publisher   = "TulQuest",  address     = "France",  type        = "WorkingPaper",  institution = "TulQuest", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The goal of this questionnaire is to classify various grammatical and discourse phenomena associated with reported speech. The topics covered in the questionnaire relate to ongoing discussions on reported speech in the typological literature, but authors completing the questionnaire are encouraged to primarily focus on those topics that they deem most appropriate for their specific data type and language.Data collected through the questionnaire are not projected to constitute a maximally comparable typological data set of features. Rather, the corpus of examples and analyses constructed through the completed questionnaires is intended to show the breadth and variability of the phenomenon of reported speech across languages.The questionnaire was distributed among contributors to an edited volume of fieldwork- and corpus-based studies on reported speech (publication planned for 2022), with the aim of maximising the coverage of phenomena in the volume and prompting various analytical judgements about pragmatic and grammatical aspects of reported speech encountered by the authors.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n The representation-cohesion-stance hypothesis.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Moreno-Núñez, A.; DaSilva Sinha, V.; and Tian, Z., editor(s), Signs of Life, pages 75–109. John Benjamins, International, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{2db6b2825c9a4a34b8cf06a496322451,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Signs of Life},\r\n  publisher = {John Benjamins},\r\n  title     = {The representation-cohesion-stance hypothesis},\r\n  year      = {2020},\r\n  address   = {International},\r\n  editor    = {Ana Moreno-N{\\'u}{\\~n}ez and {DaSilva Sinha}, Vera and Zhen Tian},\r\n  isbn      = {9789027205483},\r\n  pages     = {75--109},\r\n  doi       = {10.1075/clscc.13.05spr},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2019\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n M and R as elements of a syntactic unit: Where would the relation between M and R come from, if not from syntax?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; and Nikitina, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Linguistic Typology, 23(1): 245–254. May 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{06a87c76d411494eb3c72dffd9a5520d,  title     = "M and R as elements of a syntactic unit: Where would the relation between M and R come from, if not from syntax?",  abstract  = "[Response]",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck and Tatiana Nikitina",  year      = "2019",  month     = may,  doi       = "10.1515/lingty-2019-0014",  language  = "English",  volume    = "23",  pages     = "245--254",  journal   = "Linguistic Typology",  issn      = "1430-0532",  publisher = "Sellier",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n [Response]\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.; and Nikitina, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Linguistic Typology, 23(1): 119–159. May 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{df612a5feff045b197b98b849d5e56b0,  title     = "Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain",  abstract  = "In many languages, expressions of the type {\\textquoteleft}x said: “p”{\\textquoteright}, {\\textquoteleft}x said that p{\\textquoteright}or {\\textquoteleft}allegedly, p{\\textquoteright} share properties with common syntactic types such as construc-tions with subordination, paratactic constructions, and constructions with sen-tence-level adverbs. On closer examination, however, they often turn out to beatypical members of these syntactic classes. In this paper we argue that a morecoherent picture emerges if we analyse these expressions as a dedicated syntac-tic domain in itself, which we refer to as {\\textquoteleft}reported speech{\\textquoteright}. Based on typologicalobservations we argue for the idiosyncrasy of reported speech as a syntacticclass. The article concludes with a proposal for a cross-linguistic characterisa-tion that aims at capturing this broadly conceived domain of reported speechwith a single semantic definition.",  keywords  = "DEIXIS, PERSPECTIVE, QUOTATION, SCOPE, THOUGHT, demonstration, optionality, quotation, reportativity, reported speech, syntax, 6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck and Tatiana Nikitina",  year      = "2019",  month     = may,  doi       = "10.1515/lingty-2019-0005",  language  = "English",  volume    = "23",  pages     = "119--159",  journal   = "Linguistic Typology",  issn      = "1430-0532",  publisher = "Sellier",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In many languages, expressions of the type \\textquoteleftx said: “p”\\textquoteright, \\textquoteleftx said that p\\textquoterightor \\textquoteleftallegedly, p\\textquoteright share properties with common syntactic types such as construc-tions with subordination, paratactic constructions, and constructions with sen-tence-level adverbs. On closer examination, however, they often turn out to beatypical members of these syntactic classes. In this paper we argue that a morecoherent picture emerges if we analyse these expressions as a dedicated syntac-tic domain in itself, which we refer to as \\textquoteleftreported speech\\textquoteright. Based on typologicalobservations we argue for the idiosyncrasy of reported speech as a syntacticclass. The article concludes with a proposal for a cross-linguistic characterisa-tion that aims at capturing this broadly conceived domain of reported speechwith a single semantic definition.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gentens, C.; Sansiñena Pascual, M.; Spronck, S.; and Van linden, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Pragmatics, 29(2): 155–169. April 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a80584618329409f81e86797d4bc9c1d,  title     = "Introduction: Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches",  abstract  = "In this introduction, we set out the central themes of the special issue. It concentrates on imperfect function-form mappings, and discusses several cases in which specific perspectival meanings are not fully predictable on the basis of a perspectivizing grammatical construction alone. We distinguish two kinds of form-function mismatches: (1) perspective-persistent phenomena, i.e. grammatically signaled deictic and/or cognitive perspective shifts which are not realized in interpretation, and (2) irregular perspective shifts, which involve either grammatically un(der)specified shifts or grammatically signaled shifts that are interpreted as mixing multiple sources of deictic and/or cognitive perspective ('multiple-perspective constructions'). We briefly discuss and contextualize each of the contributions, and highlight their central findings.",  keywords  = "6121 Languages, form-function mismatch, grammatical underspecification, irregular perspective shifts, multiple-perspective construction, perspective persistence",  author    = "Caroline Gentens and {Sansi{\\~n}ena Pascual}, {Mar{\\'i}a Sol} and Stef Spronck and {Van linden}, An",  year      = "2019",  month     = apr,  day       = "24",  doi       = "10.1075/prag.18050.gen",  language  = "English",  volume    = "29",  pages     = "155--169",  journal   = "Pragmatics",  issn      = "1018-2101",  publisher = "IPrA Research Center",  number    = "2", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In this introduction, we set out the central themes of the special issue. It concentrates on imperfect function-form mappings, and discusses several cases in which specific perspectival meanings are not fully predictable on the basis of a perspectivizing grammatical construction alone. We distinguish two kinds of form-function mismatches: (1) perspective-persistent phenomena, i.e. grammatically signaled deictic and/or cognitive perspective shifts which are not realized in interpretation, and (2) irregular perspective shifts, which involve either grammatically un(der)specified shifts or grammatically signaled shifts that are interpreted as mixing multiple sources of deictic and/or cognitive perspective ('multiple-perspective constructions'). We briefly discuss and contextualize each of the contributions, and highlight their central findings.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Solega defenestration: Underspecified perspective shift in an unwritten Dravidian language.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Si, A.; and Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Pragmatics, 29(2): 277–301. April 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{15b38941a72441e5bc1113f2046c24ad,  title     = "Solega defenestration: Underspecified perspective shift in an unwritten Dravidian language",  abstract  = "Based on original fieldwork, this paper discusses reported speech and thought constructions in Solega (Dravidian). Following McGregor (1994) we claim that reported speech can only be comprehensively characterised if it is identified as a syntactic construction in its own right, a construction we label a framing construction. In natural discourse, elements of the framing construction, particularly clauses referring to the reporting event, may be left unexpressed. We term framing constructions without a matrix clause {\\textquoteleft}defenestrated clauses{\\textquoteright}. While defenestrated clauses in Solega leave perspective shifts underspecified, they include several distinctive strategies that allow us to reconsider the role of morpho-syntactic marking in the expression of perspective shifts.{\\textcopyright} John Benjamins Publishing Company",  keywords  = "6121 Languages, optional marking, quotation, reported speech and Solega (Dravidian), reported speech, quotation, optional marking, Solega (Dravidian), QUOTATION, SPEECH, SEMANTICS, THOUGHT, DEIXIS",  author    = "Aung Si and Stef Spronck",  year      = "2019",  month     = apr,  day       = "24",  doi       = "10.1075/prag.18048.si",  language  = "English",  volume    = "29",  pages     = "277--301",  journal   = "Pragmatics",  issn      = "1018-2101",  publisher = "IPrA Research Center",  number    = "2", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Based on original fieldwork, this paper discusses reported speech and thought constructions in Solega (Dravidian). Following McGregor (1994) we claim that reported speech can only be comprehensively characterised if it is identified as a syntactic construction in its own right, a construction we label a framing construction. In natural discourse, elements of the framing construction, particularly clauses referring to the reporting event, may be left unexpressed. We term framing constructions without a matrix clause \\textquoteleftdefenestrated clauses\\textquoteright. While defenestrated clauses in Solega leave perspective shifts underspecified, they include several distinctive strategies that allow us to reconsider the role of morpho-syntactic marking in the expression of perspective shifts.© John Benjamins Publishing Company\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dor, Daniel: The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015 [Book review].\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(1): 132–136. January 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{f7651abbc8154997aba423592700b160,  title     = "Dor, Daniel: The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015 [Book review]",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2019",  month     = jan,  day       = "2",  doi       = "10.1080/07268602.2016.1255121",  language  = "English",  volume    = "39",  pages     = "132--136",  journal   = "Australian Journal of Linguistics",  issn      = "0726-8602",  publisher = "Routledge",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Pragmatics: Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gentens, C.; Sansiñena Pascual, M.; Spronck, S.; and Van linden, A.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n of PragmaticsJohn Benjamins, International, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{125bb79f29fa4b919208a1a70d3e7dd1,  title     = "Pragmatics: Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  editor    = "Caroline Gentens and {Sansi{\\~n}ena Pascual}, {Mar{\\'i}a Sol} and Stef Spronck and {Van linden}, An",  year      = "2019",  doi       = "10.1075/prag.18050.gen",  language  = "English",  series    = "Pragmatics",  publisher = "John Benjamins",  number    = "2",  address   = "International", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Speaking for Bakhtin: Two Interpretations of Reported Speech. A Response to Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия Лингвистика, 23(3): 603–618. 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{e8926f95013d4a3697ebc23eb97fda0a,  title     = "Speaking for Bakhtin: Two Interpretations of Reported Speech. A Response to Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018)",  abstract  = "Volo{\\v s}inov ([1929]1973) is one of the most frequently cited works in studies on reported speech, but its interpretation varies considerably between authors. Within the linguistic anthropological tradition, its central message is often conflated with Erving Goffman{\\textquoteright}s {\\textquoteleft}speaker roles{\\textquoteright}, and in a recent publication, Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) marry ideas they attribute to Volo{\\v s}inov (1973) and Mikhail M. Bakhtin to those by the formal semanticist Donald Davidson. Responding to Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) (and a shorter version of a similar argument in (Goddard and Wierzbicka 2019)), this paper seeks to explore the philosophical foundations of reported speech research, particularly in relation to Volo{\\v s}inov/Bakhtin. It suggests that reported speech research is motivated by two fundamentally distinct goals, one here labelled {\\textquoteleft}Fregean{\\textquoteright} and the other {\\textquoteleft}Bakhtinian{\\textquoteright}. Questions and methods used in both of these research traditions lead to two radically different understandings of reported speech. This affects the applicability of the definition of direct/indirect speech Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) propose. It also motivates an alternative approach to reported speech advocated by the current author and others that is criticised by Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018). The article further seeks to rehabilitate the analysis of Wierzbicka (1974), which Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) partially reject. Whereas Wierzbicka (1974) treats direct and indirect speech as constructions of English, Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) elevate the opposition to a universal, which belies the cultural sensitivity to semantic variation the authors display in other work. The paper concludes with a brief note about the semantic status of {\\textquoteleft}say{\\textquoteright} in Australian languages and states that the relevance of Volo{\\v s}inov ([1929]1973) is undiminished, also in the light of recent developments in language description. It remains a highly original study whose implications are yet to fully impact research on reported speech.",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2019",  doi       = "10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-603-618",  language  = "English",  volume    = "23",  pages     = "603--618",  journal   = "Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия Лингвистика",  issn      = "2312-9182",  publisher = "Rossijskij universitet dru{\\v z}by narodov ",  number    = "3", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Volo ̌sinov ([1929]1973) is one of the most frequently cited works in studies on reported speech, but its interpretation varies considerably between authors. Within the linguistic anthropological tradition, its central message is often conflated with Erving Goffman\\textquoterights \\textquoteleftspeaker roles\\textquoteright, and in a recent publication, Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) marry ideas they attribute to Volo ̌sinov (1973) and Mikhail M. Bakhtin to those by the formal semanticist Donald Davidson. Responding to Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) (and a shorter version of a similar argument in (Goddard and Wierzbicka 2019)), this paper seeks to explore the philosophical foundations of reported speech research, particularly in relation to Volo ̌sinov/Bakhtin. It suggests that reported speech research is motivated by two fundamentally distinct goals, one here labelled \\textquoteleftFregean\\textquoteright and the other \\textquoteleftBakhtinian\\textquoteright. Questions and methods used in both of these research traditions lead to two radically different understandings of reported speech. This affects the applicability of the definition of direct/indirect speech Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) propose. It also motivates an alternative approach to reported speech advocated by the current author and others that is criticised by Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018). The article further seeks to rehabilitate the analysis of Wierzbicka (1974), which Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) partially reject. Whereas Wierzbicka (1974) treats direct and indirect speech as constructions of English, Goddard and Wierzbicka (2018) elevate the opposition to a universal, which belies the cultural sensitivity to semantic variation the authors display in other work. The paper concludes with a brief note about the semantic status of \\textquoteleftsay\\textquoteright in Australian languages and states that the relevance of Volo ̌sinov ([1929]1973) is undiminished, also in the light of recent developments in language description. It remains a highly original study whose implications are yet to fully impact research on reported speech.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n To whom it may concern: Some recent developments in the typology of discourse structuring and discourse reference [book reviews].\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Linguistic Typology, 23(3): 573–587. 2019.\n Book reviews: Reviewed books: -Andrej A. Kibrik. 2011. Reference in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199215805. -Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matic, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio (editors). 2014. Information Structure and Reference Tracking in ComplexSentences. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ISBN: 9789027206862. -M. M. J. Fernandez-Vest. 2015. Detachments for Cohesion: Toward an Information Grammar of Oral Languages. Berlin/Munich/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-034924-5.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{a851ee6abb05457aac12366f99df588c,  title     = "To whom it may concern: Some recent developments in the typology of discourse structuring and discourse reference [book reviews]",  keywords  = "6121 Languages",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  note      = "Book reviews: Reviewed books: -Andrej A. Kibrik. 2011. Reference in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199215805. -Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matic, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio (editors). 2014. Information Structure and Reference Tracking in ComplexSentences. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ISBN: 9789027206862. -M. M. J. Fernandez-Vest. 2015. Detachments for Cohesion: Toward an Information Grammar of Oral Languages. Berlin/Munich/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-034924-5.",  year      = "2019",  doi       = "10.1515/lingty-2019-0026",  language  = "English",  volume    = "23",  pages     = "573–587",  journal   = "Linguistic Typology",  issn      = "1430-0532",  publisher = "Sellier",  number    = "3", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2018\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Wat vertellen taboetalen ons?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Alles wat je altijd al had willen weten over taal. De taalcanon. Meulenhoff, Holland, 3rd edition, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{08d6df46d39f4fe08345bd119c28d87f,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Alles wat je altijd al had willen weten over taal. De taalcanon},\r\n  publisher = {Meulenhoff},\r\n  title     = {Wat vertellen taboetalen ons?},\r\n  year      = {2018},\r\n  address   = {Holland},\r\n  edition   = {3rd},\r\n  isbn      = {9789029093200},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Spr{\\aa}kvetenskaper},\r\n  language  = {nederl{\\"a}ndska},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2017\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Defenestration: deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Pragmatics,104–133. 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{5bf15a81ecbe4781815ca164cd7169e6,  title     = "Defenestration: deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin",  abstract  = "The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2017",  doi       = "10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.016",  language  = "English",  pages     = "104--133",  journal   = "Journal of Pragmatics",  issn      = "0378-2166",  publisher = "Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin (Worrorran) has one single complex-clause construction for expressing reported speech (`say'), that can also signal reported thought (`think') and attribute intentions (`want'). By demonstrating which formal and functional distinctions are essential to the interpretation of this Ungarinyin construction, the present paper aims to contribute to understanding the exact nature of the syntactic relation involved in reported speech constructions. Following the account of McGregor (1994; 1997; 2008), I analyse the clausal syntax of reported speech constructions as a dedicated syntactic relation, separate from more familiar clausal relations such as coordination and subordination. I call this relation the `frame-in' construction. Subsequently, I compare the conventionalised reported speech construction in Ungarinyin to a variety of more loosely integrated non-conventionalised or semi-conventionalised strategies for expressing speech and thought attribution in the language. Collectively I refer to these strategies as examples of `defenestration', constructions without the typical marking of the syntactic frame-in relation, while expressing the meaning associated with a regular frame-in construction. Instances of defenestration differ from syntactic frame-in in that they express the meaning of a frame-in construction through transparent compositional means. I argue that types of defenestration show remarkable regularities in Ungarinyin, and, tentatively, crosslinguistically, which has consequences for the analysis of indexicality and iconicity in syntax and presents a new context for analysing the syntax of reported speech constructions in relation to multimodal features, particulary for the category of free (in)direct speech and `zero quotatives'.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2016\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Evidential fictive interaction (in Ungarinyin and Russian).\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Pascual, E.; and Sandler, S., editor(s), The Conversation Frame, pages 255–275. John Benjamins, International, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{7e5b415e93a743468bd30c1be502a2e7,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {The Conversation Frame},\r\n  publisher = {John Benjamins},\r\n  title     = {Evidential fictive interaction (in Ungarinyin and Russian)},\r\n  year      = {2016},\r\n  address   = {International},\r\n  editor    = {Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler},\r\n  isbn      = {9789027246714},\r\n  pages     = {255–275},\r\n  abstract  = {This chapter introduces and examines the notion of “evidential fictive participants”and their grammatical expression in utterances of fictive interaction. It focuses on fictive direct speech constructions and draws on examples from the Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin and Russian. After presenting data from these languages the chapter suggests that through the notion of participants fictive interaction forms a framework for grammatical typology. This framework has both a strong philosophical and analytical foundation and allows for an integrated approach to grammatical categories based on their relation to the conversation frame.},\r\n  doi       = {10.1075/hcp.55.13spr},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This chapter introduces and examines the notion of “evidential fictive participants”and their grammatical expression in utterances of fictive interaction. It focuses on fictive direct speech constructions and draws on examples from the Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin and Russian. After presenting data from these languages the chapter suggests that through the notion of participants fictive interaction forms a framework for grammatical typology. This framework has both a strong philosophical and analytical foundation and allows for an integrated approach to grammatical categories based on their relation to the conversation frame.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2015\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n New Genetic and Linguistic Analyses Show Ancient Human Influence on Baobab Evolution and Distribution in Australia.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rangan, H.; Bell, K.; Baum, D.; Fowler, R.; McConvell, P.; Saunders, T.; Spronck, S.; Kull, C.; and Murphy, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n PLoS One, 10(4). 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{afecd6531e4c4ebfb97b0e676847708e,  title     = "New Genetic and Linguistic Analyses Show Ancient Human Influence on Baobab Evolution and Distribution in Australia",  abstract  = "This study investigates the role of human agency in the gene flow and geographical distribution of the Australian baobab, Adansonia gregorii. The genus Adansonia is a charismatic tree endemic to Africa, Madagascar, and northwest Australia that has long been valued by humans for its multiple uses. The distribution of genetic variation in baobabs in Africa has been partially attributed to human-mediated dispersal over millennia, but this relationship has never been investigated for the Australian species. We combined genetic and linguistic data to analyse geographic patterns of gene flow and movement of word-forms for A. gregorii in the Aboriginal languages of northwest Australia. Comprehensive assessment of genetic diversity showed weak geographic structure and high gene flow. Of potential dispersal vectors, humans were identified as most likely to have enabled gene flow across biogeographic barriers in northwest Australia. Genetic-linguistic analysis demonstrated congruence of gene flow patterns and directional movement of Aboriginal loanwords for A. gregorii. These findings, along with previous archaeobotanical evidence from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene, suggest that ancient humans significantly influenced the geographic distribution of Adansonia in northwest Australia.",  author    = "Haripriya Rangan and Bell, {Karen L.} and Baum, {David A.} and Rachael Fowler and Patrick McConvell and Thomas Saunders and Stef Spronck and Kull, {Christian A.} and Murphy, {Daniel J.}",  year      = "2015",  doi       = "10.1371/journal.pone.0119758",  language  = "English",  volume    = "10",  journal   = "PLoS One",  issn      = "1932-6203",  publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE",  number    = "4", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This study investigates the role of human agency in the gene flow and geographical distribution of the Australian baobab, Adansonia gregorii. The genus Adansonia is a charismatic tree endemic to Africa, Madagascar, and northwest Australia that has long been valued by humans for its multiple uses. The distribution of genetic variation in baobabs in Africa has been partially attributed to human-mediated dispersal over millennia, but this relationship has never been investigated for the Australian species. We combined genetic and linguistic data to analyse geographic patterns of gene flow and movement of word-forms for A. gregorii in the Aboriginal languages of northwest Australia. Comprehensive assessment of genetic diversity showed weak geographic structure and high gene flow. Of potential dispersal vectors, humans were identified as most likely to have enabled gene flow across biogeographic barriers in northwest Australia. Genetic-linguistic analysis demonstrated congruence of gene flow patterns and directional movement of Aboriginal loanwords for A. gregorii. These findings, along with previous archaeobotanical evidence from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene, suggest that ancient humans significantly influenced the geographic distribution of Adansonia in northwest Australia.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Refracting views: How to construct complex perspective in reported speech and thought in Ungarinyin.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n STUF - Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 68(2). 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{b5429844225e4d34ab4300f9fc478270,  title     = "Refracting views: How to construct complex perspective in reported speech and thought in Ungarinyin",  abstract  = "This paper analyses reported speech, thought and epistemic modality in the North Western Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin. It demonstrates how these grammatical domains interact in the language to encode multiple perspective meanings. The paper concludes by discussing some implications of the Ungarinyin patterns for expressions of complex perspective elsewhere.",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2015",  doi       = "10.1515/stuf-2015-0009",  language  = "English",  volume    = "68",  journal   = "STUF - Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung",  issn      = "0942-2919",  publisher = "Akademie Verlag",  number    = "2", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper analyses reported speech, thought and epistemic modality in the North Western Australian Aboriginal language Ungarinyin. It demonstrates how these grammatical domains interact in the language to encode multiple perspective meanings. The paper concludes by discussing some implications of the Ungarinyin patterns for expressions of complex perspective elsewhere.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29(1): 193–216. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{438014755fac458293a3712130b86794,  title     = "Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality",  abstract  = "Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly commitment effects and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach present us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure.",  author    = "Stef Spronck",  year      = "2015",  doi       = "10.1075/bjl.29.09spr",  language  = "English",  volume    = "29",  pages     = "193–216",  journal   = "Belgian Journal of Linguistics",  issn      = "0774-5141",  publisher = "John Benjamins",  number    = "1", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly commitment effects and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach present us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2014\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Linguistic prehistory of the Australian boab.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n McConvell, P.; Saunders, T.; and Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Gawne, L.; and Vaughan, J., editor(s), Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013, 2014. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{85ee13e779c6406da6cce86531b6ddc2,  title     = "Linguistic prehistory of the Australian boab",  abstract  = "Boabs, a close relation of the African baobabs, are found only in the Kimberley region of Western Australia and a region close by in the Northern Territory. Here several of the words for the boab tree and its parts are examined with special emphasis on loanwords which cross language family boundaries going in a west-east direction. It is proposed that this linguistic diffusion may reflect dispersal of the tree into new areas on the east, in relatively recent times. On the other hand another recent diffusion from the west of new salient functions of the boab fruit spread a new term to central Kimberley where boabs are known to have been present and used by humans for many thousands of years.",  author    = "Patrick McConvell and Thomas Saunders and Stef Spronck",  year      = "2014",  language  = "English",  editor    = "Lauren Gawne and Jill Vaughan",  booktitle = "Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Boabs, a close relation of the African baobabs, are found only in the Kimberley region of Western Australia and a region close by in the Northern Territory. Here several of the words for the boab tree and its parts are examined with special emphasis on loanwords which cross language family boundaries going in a west-east direction. It is proposed that this linguistic diffusion may reflect dispersal of the tree into new areas on the east, in relatively recent times. On the other hand another recent diffusion from the west of new salient functions of the boab fruit spread a new term to central Kimberley where boabs are known to have been present and used by humans for many thousands of years.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2012\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Getting the Story Straight: Language Fieldwork Using a Narrative Problem-Solving Task.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n San Roque, L.; Gawne, L.; Hoenigman, D.; Miller, J.; Rumsey, A.; Spronck, S.; Carroll, A.; and Evans, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Language documentation and conservation, 6. 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{092698493f5e4b659b6188183bd50b33,  title     = "Getting the Story Straight: Language Fieldwork Using a Narrative Problem-Solving Task",  author    = "{San Roque}, Lila and Lauren Gawne and Darja Hoenigman and Julia Miller and Alan Rumsey and Stef Spronck and Alice Carroll and Nicholas Evans",  year      = "2012",  doi       = "http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4504",  language  = "English",  volume    = "6",  journal   = "Language documentation and conservation",  issn      = "1934-5275",  publisher = "University of Hawaii press", }\r\n\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Minds divided: Speaker attitudes in quotatives.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spronck, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Buchstaller, I.; and van Alphen , I., editor(s), Quotatives, pages 71–116. John Benjamins, International, 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{bc4ad29416134033a3f675f247b8d778,\r\n  author    = {Stef Spronck},\r\n  booktitle = {Quotatives},\r\n  publisher = {John Benjamins},\r\n  title     = {Minds divided: Speaker attitudes in quotatives},\r\n  year      = {2012},\r\n  address   = {International},\r\n  editor    = {Isabelle Buchstaller and {van Alphen}, Ingrid},\r\n  pages     = {71--116},\r\n  abstract  = {This chapter analyzes how speakers can co-encode a reported message andan evaluation of that message in a quotative construction. It presents atypological account of the structures and meanings languages may employto express, for example, (dis)agreement with or doubt in the truth of themessage conveyed and suggests ways in which this may correlate with typesof quotative constructions. It argues that interactions between modality andevidentiality in quotatives determine their form and function, and introducesa constructionist model to capture these interactions. By identifying thecategories relevant for studying speaker attitudes in quotation, it aims topresent a method for the typological analysis of quotatives as {\\textquoteleft}doublevoicedutterances{\\textquoteright}, as conceived in Volo{\\v s}inov (1973) and Jakobson (1957).},\r\n  keywords  = {6121 Languages, speaker attitudes , multiple-perspective constructions, reported speech, modality, evidentiality},\r\n  language  = {English},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This chapter analyzes how speakers can co-encode a reported message andan evaluation of that message in a quotative construction. It presents atypological account of the structures and meanings languages may employto express, for example, (dis)agreement with or doubt in the truth of themessage conveyed and suggests ways in which this may correlate with typesof quotative constructions. It argues that interactions between modality andevidentiality in quotatives determine their form and function, and introducesa constructionist model to capture these interactions. By identifying thecategories relevant for studying speaker attitudes in quotation, it aims topresent a method for the typological analysis of quotatives as \\textquoteleftdoublevoicedutterances\\textquoteright, as conceived in Volo ̌sinov (1973) and Jakobson (1957).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);