var bibbase_data = {"data":"\"Loading..\"\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n
\n generated by\n \n \"bibbase.org\"\n\n \n
\n \n\n
\n\n \n\n\n
\n\n Excellent! Next you can\n create a new website with this list, or\n embed it in an existing web page by copying & pasting\n any of the following snippets.\n\n
\n JavaScript\n (easiest)\n
\n \n <script src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fzotero-group%2Frosariorogel%2F5775713&jsonp=1&jsonp=1\"></script>\n \n
\n\n PHP\n
\n \n <?php\n $contents = file_get_contents(\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fzotero-group%2Frosariorogel%2F5775713&jsonp=1\");\n print_r($contents);\n ?>\n \n
\n\n iFrame\n (not recommended)\n
\n \n <iframe src=\"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fbibbase.org%2Fzotero-group%2Frosariorogel%2F5775713&jsonp=1\"></iframe>\n \n
\n\n

\n For more details see the documention.\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n This is a preview! To use this list on your own web site\n or create a new web site from it,\n create a free account. The file will be added\n and you will be able to edit it in the File Manager.\n We will show you instructions once you've created your account.\n
\n\n
\n\n

To the site owner:

\n\n

Action required! Mendeley is changing its\n API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April\n 14th, you need to:\n

    \n
  1. renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
  2. \n
  3. update the BibBase URL\n in your page the same way you did when you initially set up\n this page.\n
  4. \n
\n

\n\n

\n \n \n Fix it now\n

\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n \n
\n
\n  \n 2025\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n ¿Legitimación artificial?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (53): 130–150. December 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"¿LegitimaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2025.82303ocampoLegitimacionArtificial2025,\n\ttitle = {¿{Legitimación} artificial?},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2025},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/82303},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/0719-0527.2025.82303},\n\tabstract = {This essay aims to explore the tensions between digital communication and legitimation by procedures within the framework of a sociology of artificial communication. First, it reconstructs the emergence of the digital medium among society's means of propagation. Then, it establishes the medial and operational relationship between digital and artificial communication. Then, it examines and compares the communicative possibilities of digital and artificial communication. Our analysis reveals technical, temporal, and participatory differences in how digital and artificial communication are integrated into judicial, electoral, parliamentary, and administrative organizations that are responsible for making and implementing collectively binding decisions. These differences are relevant for characterizing the distinct challenges each poses to procedural legitimacy.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {53},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {procedimientos},\n\tpages = {130--150},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This essay aims to explore the tensions between digital communication and legitimation by procedures within the framework of a sociology of artificial communication. First, it reconstructs the emergence of the digital medium among society's means of propagation. Then, it establishes the medial and operational relationship between digital and artificial communication. Then, it examines and compares the communicative possibilities of digital and artificial communication. Our analysis reveals technical, temporal, and participatory differences in how digital and artificial communication are integrated into judicial, electoral, parliamentary, and administrative organizations that are responsible for making and implementing collectively binding decisions. These differences are relevant for characterizing the distinct challenges each poses to procedural legitimacy.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Citation Functions and Their Role in Scientific Organization.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vélez-Cuartas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n July 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"CitationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{velez-cuartas_citation_2025,\n\ttitle = {Citation {Functions} and {Their} {Role} in {Scientific} {Organization}.},\n\tcopyright = {https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode},\n\turl = {https://osf.io/37hjd_v1},\n\tdoi = {10.31235/osf.io/37hjd_v1},\n\tabstract = {This article presents general elements of a citation theory based on the concept of networks (structures) of meaning. From this perspective, citation acts as an operator of meaning, generating structures representing social dynamics in knowledge production. This citation theory allows for observing the trajectories of scientific and humanistic communications. It describes the structural characteristics that lead to the constitution of scientific meaning for both academic and non-academic communities. Initially, the primary debates generated by its use and analysis will be proposed, followed by a theoretical-analytical model of citation in line with the contemporary evolution of its role.},\n\turldate = {2026-02-18},\n\tpublisher = {SocArXiv},\n\tauthor = {Vélez-Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article presents general elements of a citation theory based on the concept of networks (structures) of meaning. From this perspective, citation acts as an operator of meaning, generating structures representing social dynamics in knowledge production. This citation theory allows for observing the trajectories of scientific and humanistic communications. It describes the structural characteristics that lead to the constitution of scientific meaning for both academic and non-academic communities. Initially, the primary debates generated by its use and analysis will be proposed, followed by a theoretical-analytical model of citation in line with the contemporary evolution of its role.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n ¿Por qué la ciencia mantiene un punto de vista masculino?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ruiz, L. R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Vital, 3(1). March 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"¿PorPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{ruiz_por_2025,\n\ttitle = {¿{Por} qué la ciencia mantiene un punto de vista masculino?},\n\tvolume = {3},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2025 Liliana Ramírez Ruiz},\n\tissn = {3061-7944},\n\turl = {https://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/cienciavital/article/view/6638},\n\tdoi = {10.20983/cienciavital.2025.01.soc.01},\n\tabstract = {El artículo analiza la persistente perspectiva masculina en la ciencia, destacando la subrepresentación y discriminación de las mujeres, especialmente en ciencias exactas e ingeniería. Se enfatiza la necesidad de reconocer las contribuciones femeninas y reformar la educación para incluir visiones más inclusivas. El texto también aborda cómo la baja participación femenina afecta la diversidad y equidad en la ciencia, perpetuando sesgos y desigualdades. Subraya la importancia de abordar estas cuestiones para crear un entorno científico más inclusivo y diverso, concluyendo que el cambio hacia prácticas más equitativas es crucial para el progreso científico.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Vital},\n\tauthor = {Ruiz, Liliana Ramírez},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {Innovación},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El artículo analiza la persistente perspectiva masculina en la ciencia, destacando la subrepresentación y discriminación de las mujeres, especialmente en ciencias exactas e ingeniería. Se enfatiza la necesidad de reconocer las contribuciones femeninas y reformar la educación para incluir visiones más inclusivas. El texto también aborda cómo la baja participación femenina afecta la diversidad y equidad en la ciencia, perpetuando sesgos y desigualdades. Subraya la importancia de abordar estas cuestiones para crear un entorno científico más inclusivo y diverso, concluyendo que el cambio hacia prácticas más equitativas es crucial para el progreso científico.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Algoritmos da sociedade.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Costa, A. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (53): 8–29. December 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AlgoritmosPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{costa_algoritmos_2025,\n\ttitle = {Algoritmos da sociedade},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2025},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/82294},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/0719-0527.2025.82294},\n\tabstract = {This article analyzes how the understanding that society develops about itself, as it self-describes, is increasingly mediated by programs based on algorithms. The term “algorithms of society” highlights the role of algorithms in social description, showing that these operations configure contexts and autonomous structures within the digital systems themselves. Inspired by Niklas Luhmann’s The Society of Society, it investigates how social self-description begins to incorporate algorithmic mediation, expanding the scope and articulation of social semantics. The text deepens the notions of “form” and “medium” to argue that algorithms structure social operations and communicational possibilities: algorithms have ceased to be merely external tools and have come to operate as internal elements of social self-description, responding to the demand to deal with complexity, acceleration and functional differentiation. The data show that essential decisions today are mediated by algorithmic systems whose legitimacy is naturalized despite the opacity of their criteria. The article concludes that, as algorithms become operators of decision and meaning, they reconfigure the way society observes itself, organizes itself, and produces meaning in the present.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {53},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Costa, Antônio Luz},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {imanência dos signos},\n\tpages = {8--29},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article analyzes how the understanding that society develops about itself, as it self-describes, is increasingly mediated by programs based on algorithms. The term “algorithms of society” highlights the role of algorithms in social description, showing that these operations configure contexts and autonomous structures within the digital systems themselves. Inspired by Niklas Luhmann’s The Society of Society, it investigates how social self-description begins to incorporate algorithmic mediation, expanding the scope and articulation of social semantics. The text deepens the notions of “form” and “medium” to argue that algorithms structure social operations and communicational possibilities: algorithms have ceased to be merely external tools and have come to operate as internal elements of social self-description, responding to the demand to deal with complexity, acceleration and functional differentiation. The data show that essential decisions today are mediated by algorithmic systems whose legitimacy is naturalized despite the opacity of their criteria. The article concludes that, as algorithms become operators of decision and meaning, they reconfigure the way society observes itself, organizes itself, and produces meaning in the present.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El derecho de la sociedad algorítmica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Silva, A. S. d.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (53): 151–169. December 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{silva_derecho_2025,\n\ttitle = {El derecho de la sociedad algorítmica},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2025},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/82304},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/0719-0527.2025.82304},\n\tabstract = {The presence of computational algorithms in various areas of everyday life has led us to propose the term ‘algorithmic society’. To investigate how algorithms are influencing society's laws, we searched the Internet for cases. The searches were conducted using the following terms in Spanish, English, and Portuguese: ‘algorithms and law,’ ‘artificial intelligence and law,’ ‘artificial intelligence and legal cases,’ and ‘artificial intelligence and legal decisions.’ The responses were compiled and the data presented in an Excel spreadsheet and analysed from the perspective of Niklas Luhmann's theory of society as a communication system with meaning. In our survey, we observed two extremes: on the one hand, those who consider the relationship between algorithms and law as a way to solve various problems in legal practice and, on the other hand, those who consider this relationship to be harmful, as artificial intelligence algorithms will replace humans. Our research to date leads us to believe that both extremes are misleading, not only because futurism is a form of self-delusion, but also because the responsibility for human decision-making will never cease to be human. After all, in all human interpretation (including legal interpretation), the attribution of value, the acceptance or rejection of an argument or information, is not a matter of the interpreter's exclusive will, but involves the participation and presence of various elements of the materiality, temporality and sociality of meaning.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {53},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Silva, Artur Stamford da},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {sociedad algorítmica},\n\tpages = {151--169},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The presence of computational algorithms in various areas of everyday life has led us to propose the term ‘algorithmic society’. To investigate how algorithms are influencing society's laws, we searched the Internet for cases. The searches were conducted using the following terms in Spanish, English, and Portuguese: ‘algorithms and law,’ ‘artificial intelligence and law,’ ‘artificial intelligence and legal cases,’ and ‘artificial intelligence and legal decisions.’ The responses were compiled and the data presented in an Excel spreadsheet and analysed from the perspective of Niklas Luhmann's theory of society as a communication system with meaning. In our survey, we observed two extremes: on the one hand, those who consider the relationship between algorithms and law as a way to solve various problems in legal practice and, on the other hand, those who consider this relationship to be harmful, as artificial intelligence algorithms will replace humans. Our research to date leads us to believe that both extremes are misleading, not only because futurism is a form of self-delusion, but also because the responsibility for human decision-making will never cease to be human. After all, in all human interpretation (including legal interpretation), the attribution of value, the acceptance or rejection of an argument or information, is not a matter of the interpreter's exclusive will, but involves the participation and presence of various elements of the materiality, temporality and sociality of meaning.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n De la imprenta al algoritmo.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (53): 80–107. December 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n  \n \n 4 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rogel-salazar_imprenta_2025,\n\ttitle = {De la imprenta al algoritmo},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2025},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/82301},\n\tdoi = {10.5354/0719-0527.2025.82301},\n\tabstract = {This article examines how—while maintaining the true/false binary code that distinguishes scientific communications—the self-evaluation of the science system has been reprogrammed through couplings with algorithmic infrastructures. Four dimensions are analyzed: 1. Temporality: the adoption of preprints and continuous editing has turned manuscripts into “living documents”; 2. Visibility: open peer review has deployed new circuits of legitimation; 3. Traceability: versioning, linking to data and code, and monitored retractions ensure an auditable operational memory; and 4. Agency: the incorporation of LLM platforms and AI tools reconfigures roles and flows in discovery, writing, and evaluation. In addition, emerging pathologies (predatory publishers, paper mills, plagiarism, and undeclared use of AI) are integrated as disturbances that affect the system's programs and expectations. The concept of algorithmically mediated self-evaluation is proposed as a heuristic category. It is concluded that self-evaluation persists as an essential function, although its forms have been reconfigured by new socio-technical infrastructures that demand criteria of transparency and accountability in line with the current communication regime.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {53},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tkeywords = {autoevaluación mediada por algoritmo},\n\tpages = {80--107},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article examines how—while maintaining the true/false binary code that distinguishes scientific communications—the self-evaluation of the science system has been reprogrammed through couplings with algorithmic infrastructures. Four dimensions are analyzed: 1. Temporality: the adoption of preprints and continuous editing has turned manuscripts into “living documents”; 2. Visibility: open peer review has deployed new circuits of legitimation; 3. Traceability: versioning, linking to data and code, and monitored retractions ensure an auditable operational memory; and 4. Agency: the incorporation of LLM platforms and AI tools reconfigures roles and flows in discovery, writing, and evaluation. In addition, emerging pathologies (predatory publishers, paper mills, plagiarism, and undeclared use of AI) are integrated as disturbances that affect the system's programs and expectations. The concept of algorithmically mediated self-evaluation is proposed as a heuristic category. It is concluded that self-evaluation persists as an essential function, although its forms have been reconfigured by new socio-technical infrastructures that demand criteria of transparency and accountability in line with the current communication regime.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sociological Perspectives on AI, Intelligence and Communication.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Tække, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Systems Research and Behavioral Science, n/a(n/a). 2025.\n _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sres.3123\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"SociologicalPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{taekke_sociological_2025,\n\ttitle = {Sociological {Perspectives} on {AI}, {Intelligence} and {Communication}},\n\tvolume = {n/a},\n\tissn = {1099-1743},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/13DNeUwKkUY5_S5AvsEEGn7ZOotVrDoDe/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tdoi = {10.1002/sres.3123},\n\tabstract = {Introduction. This article presents a comprehensive theoretical model to understand the societal challenges posed by AI, examining AI as a unique form of intelligence—distinct from human cognition—that functions as a computational technology integrated into societal communication processes. Using educational systems as a key example, the article explores AI's implications for functional differentiation across society. Methods. The study applies Luhmann's systems theory, emphasizing communication, double contingency, and the transformative role of digital media and AI. A sociological analysis is conducted on how AI, through virtual double contingency, affects communication within interaction, organization, and functional systems, embedding values beyond negotiation. Results. Findings indicate that AI results in algorithmic differentiation which disrupts traditional communication structures, diminishing functional autonomy within systems like education and altering social structures with profound implications for individuals and society. This transformation is analysed within three societal models: authoritarian, market-driven, and democratic. Conclusion. While AI integration is essential to maintain European competitiveness alongside the USA and China, it also poses risks to functional differentiation and democratic principles. The article underscores the necessity of a robust regulatory framework and value-driven approach to responsibly leverage AI's benefits without undermining societal structures or the European democratic model.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {n/a},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tjournal = {Systems Research and Behavioral Science},\n\tauthor = {Tække, Jesper},\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tnote = {\\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sres.3123},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, artificial intelligence, communication, digitalization, education, intelligence, media, social structure, societal communication},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Introduction. This article presents a comprehensive theoretical model to understand the societal challenges posed by AI, examining AI as a unique form of intelligence—distinct from human cognition—that functions as a computational technology integrated into societal communication processes. Using educational systems as a key example, the article explores AI's implications for functional differentiation across society. Methods. The study applies Luhmann's systems theory, emphasizing communication, double contingency, and the transformative role of digital media and AI. A sociological analysis is conducted on how AI, through virtual double contingency, affects communication within interaction, organization, and functional systems, embedding values beyond negotiation. Results. Findings indicate that AI results in algorithmic differentiation which disrupts traditional communication structures, diminishing functional autonomy within systems like education and altering social structures with profound implications for individuals and society. This transformation is analysed within three societal models: authoritarian, market-driven, and democratic. Conclusion. While AI integration is essential to maintain European competitiveness alongside the USA and China, it also poses risks to functional differentiation and democratic principles. The article underscores the necessity of a robust regulatory framework and value-driven approach to responsibly leverage AI's benefits without undermining societal structures or the European democratic model.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Citation functions and their role on scientific organization.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vélez Cuartas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Diversifying Theory in Science and Technology Studies - Latin American Perspectives. Palgrave, In press edition, 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{velez_cuartas_citation_2025,\n\tedition = {In press},\n\ttitle = {Citation functions and their role on scientific organization},\n\tbooktitle = {Diversifying {Theory} in {Science} and {Technology} {Studies} - {Latin} \nAmerican {Perspectives}},\n\tpublisher = {Palgrave},\n\tauthor = {Vélez Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2024\n \n \n (7)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rapp, A. C.; and Corral-Granados, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4): 423–439. March 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"UnderstandingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rapp_understanding_2024,\n\ttitle = {Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective},\n\tvolume = {28},\n\tissn = {1360-3116, 1464-5173},\n\turl = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of Inclusive Education},\n\tauthor = {Rapp, Anna Cecilia and Corral-Granados, Anabel},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tpages = {423--439},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n In the Society of Digital Media.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Baecker, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n June 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{baecker_society_2024,\n\ttitle = {In the {Society} of {Digital} {Media}},\n\tauthor = {Baecker, Dirk},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Publishers are selling papers to train AIs — and making millions of dollars.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kwon, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Nature, 636(8043): 529–530. December 2024.\n Bandiera_abtest: a Cg_type: News Subject_term: Publishing\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"PublishersPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kwon_publishers_2024,\n\ttitle = {Publishers are selling papers to train {AIs} — and making millions of dollars},\n\tvolume = {636},\n\tcopyright = {2024 Springer Nature Limited},\n\tissn = {1476-4687},\n\turl = {https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04018-5},\n\tdoi = {10.1038/d41586-024-04018-5},\n\tabstract = {Generative-AI models require massive amounts of data — scholarly publishers are licensing their content to train them.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {8043},\n\turldate = {2025-08-09},\n\tjournal = {Nature},\n\tpublisher = {Nature Publishing Group},\n\tauthor = {Kwon, Diana},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Bandiera\\_abtest: a\nCg\\_type: News\nSubject\\_term: Publishing},\n\tkeywords = {Publishing},\n\tpages = {529--530},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Generative-AI models require massive amounts of data — scholarly publishers are licensing their content to train them.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communication.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Keenan, B.; and Sokol, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n July 2024.\n arXiv:2302.03460 [cs]\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"MindPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{keenan_mind_2024,\n\ttitle = {Mind the {Gap}! {Bridging} {Explainable} {Artificial} {Intelligence} and {Human} {Understanding} with {Luhmann}'s {Functional} {Theory} of {Communication}},\n\turl = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03460},\n\tdoi = {10.48550/arXiv.2302.03460},\n\tabstract = {Over the past decade explainable artificial intelligence has evolved from a predominantly technical discipline into a field that is deeply intertwined with social sciences. Insights such as human preference for contrastive -- more precisely, counterfactual -- explanations have played a major role in this transition, inspiring and guiding the research in computer science. Other observations, while equally important, have nevertheless received much less consideration. The desire of human explainees to communicate with artificial intelligence explainers through a dialogue-like interaction has been mostly neglected by the community. This poses many challenges for the effectiveness and widespread adoption of such technologies as delivering a single explanation optimised according to some predefined objectives may fail to engender understanding in its recipients and satisfy their unique needs given the diversity of human knowledge and intention. Using insights elaborated by Niklas Luhmann and, more recently, Elena Esposito we apply social systems theory to highlight challenges in explainable artificial intelligence and offer a path forward, striving to reinvigorate the technical research in the direction of interactive and iterative explainers. Specifically, this paper demonstrates the potential of systems theoretical approaches to communication in elucidating and addressing the problems and limitations of human-centred explainable artificial intelligence.},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tpublisher = {arXiv},\n\tauthor = {Keenan, Bernard and Sokol, Kacper},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {arXiv:2302.03460 [cs]},\n\tkeywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computers and Society, Computer Science - Machine Learning},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Over the past decade explainable artificial intelligence has evolved from a predominantly technical discipline into a field that is deeply intertwined with social sciences. Insights such as human preference for contrastive – more precisely, counterfactual – explanations have played a major role in this transition, inspiring and guiding the research in computer science. Other observations, while equally important, have nevertheless received much less consideration. The desire of human explainees to communicate with artificial intelligence explainers through a dialogue-like interaction has been mostly neglected by the community. This poses many challenges for the effectiveness and widespread adoption of such technologies as delivering a single explanation optimised according to some predefined objectives may fail to engender understanding in its recipients and satisfy their unique needs given the diversity of human knowledge and intention. Using insights elaborated by Niklas Luhmann and, more recently, Elena Esposito we apply social systems theory to highlight challenges in explainable artificial intelligence and offer a path forward, striving to reinvigorate the technical research in the direction of interactive and iterative explainers. Specifically, this paper demonstrates the potential of systems theoretical approaches to communication in elucidating and addressing the problems and limitations of human-centred explainable artificial intelligence.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La transformación digital de la función judicial. El Caso del Poder Judicial chileno.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Miralles, D. Z.; and García, R. M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, 13(25): 111–147. July 2024.\n Number: 25\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{miralles_transformacion_2024,\n\ttitle = {La transformación digital de la función judicial. {El} {Caso} del {Poder} {Judicial} chileno},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2024 Danielle Zaror Mirelles},\n\tissn = {2007-4638},\n\turl = {https://www.remap.ugto.mx/index.php/remap/article/view/416},\n\tdoi = {10.15174/remap.v13i25.416},\n\tabstract = {This paper seeks to systematize and analyze the most important processes and changes that Chile has carried out in terms of digital transformation and particularly the development of the digital transformation of the judiciary. This paper makes a panoramic exposition of the changes that the country has made in the regulatory framework and how these definitions were generating a propitious environment to introduce improvements to the judicial procedure. The paper makes a description of the public and private efforts that have made these transformations possible and poses some challenges.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {25},\n\turldate = {2025-02-15},\n\tjournal = {Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública},\n\tauthor = {Miralles, Danielle Zaror and García, Rodrigo Moya},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Number: 25},\n\tkeywords = {Digitalización, LegalTech, Poder Judicial, Tramitación Electrónica, Transformación Digital},\n\tpages = {111--147},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper seeks to systematize and analyze the most important processes and changes that Chile has carried out in terms of digital transformation and particularly the development of the digital transformation of the judiciary. This paper makes a panoramic exposition of the changes that the country has made in the regulatory framework and how these definitions were generating a propitious environment to introduce improvements to the judicial procedure. The paper makes a description of the public and private efforts that have made these transformations possible and poses some challenges.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicação digital e participação dos dispositivos no mundo social.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito, 11(2): 4–24. May 2024.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaçãoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pignuoli_ocampo_comunicacao_2024,\n\ttitle = {Comunicação digital e participação dos dispositivos no mundo social},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2024 Autor e ABraSD},\n\tissn = {2359-5582},\n\turl = {https://revista.abrasd.com.br/index.php/rbsd/article/view/815},\n\tdoi = {10.21910/rbsd.v11i2.815},\n\tabstract = {This article elaborates a definition of digital communication in terms of an operational unit. To this end, the technical and sociological conditions generated by the emergence of the digital medium are analyzed. Next, the general and particular aspects of the communicative synthesis that takes place in this medium are examined and compared with the general model of communication proposed by Luhmann, in order to identify the fundamental characteristics of digital communication, both convergent and divergent in relation to the general model. On this basis, an operational definition of digital communication is proposed and a first analysis of the reordering of the conditions of participation in digital communication specific in terms of inclusion is observed.\n\\&nbsp;},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tkeywords = {Comunicação digital, Inclusão no mundo social, Teoria dos sistemas sociais},\n\tpages = {4--24},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article elaborates a definition of digital communication in terms of an operational unit. To this end, the technical and sociological conditions generated by the emergence of the digital medium are analyzed. Next, the general and particular aspects of the communicative synthesis that takes place in this medium are examined and compared with the general model of communication proposed by Luhmann, in order to identify the fundamental characteristics of digital communication, both convergent and divergent in relation to the general model. On this basis, an operational definition of digital communication is proposed and a first analysis of the reordering of the conditions of participation in digital communication specific in terms of inclusion is observed.  \n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n ¿Quién decide en los algoritmos de toma de decisiones? Dr. Dominik Hofmann, Universidad de Bielefeld.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n September 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"¿QuiénPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_quien_2024,\n\ttitle = {¿{Quién} decide en los algoritmos de toma de decisiones? {Dr}. {Dominik} {Hofmann}, {Universidad} de {Bielefeld}},\n\tvolume = {173},\n\tshorttitle = {¿{Quién} decide en los algoritmos de toma de decisiones?},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLZa37dxVEo},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 173 RELASSC, Red Latinoamericana de Sistemas Sociales, Redes y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 173 RELASSC, Red Latinoamericana de Sistemas Sociales, Redes y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2023\n \n \n (11)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jungherr, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Social Media + Society, 9(3): 20563051231186353. July 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ArtificialPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{jungherrArtificialIntelligenceDemocracy2023,\n\ttitle = {Artificial {Intelligence} and {Democracy}: {A} {Conceptual} {Framework}},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tcopyright = {cc-by-nc},\n\tissn = {2056-3051, 2056-3051},\n\tshorttitle = {Artificial {Intelligence} and {Democracy}},\n\turl = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20563051231186353},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/20563051231186353},\n\tabstract = {The success and widespread deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) have raised awareness of the technology’s economic, social, and political consequences. Each new step in the development and application of AI is accompanied by speculations about a supposedly imminent but largely fictional artificial general intelligence (AGI) with (super-)human capacities, as seen in the unfolding discourse about capabilities and impact of large language models (LLMs) in the wake of ChatGPT. These far-reaching expectations lead to a discussion on the societal and political impact of AI that is largely dominated by unfocused fears and enthusiasms. In contrast, this article provides a framework for a more focused and productive analysis and discussion of AI’s likely impact on one specific social field: democracy. First, it is necessary to be clear about the workings of AI. This means differentiating between what is at present a largely imaginary AGI and narrow artificial intelligence focused on solving specific tasks. This distinction allows for a critical discussion of how AI affects different aspects of democracy, including its effects on the conditions of self-rule and people’s opportunities to exercise it, equality, the institution of elections, and competition between democratic and autocratic systems of government. This article shows that the consequences of today’s AI are more specific for democracy than broad speculation about AGI capabilities implies. Focusing on these specific aspects will account for actual threats and opportunities and thus allow for better monitoring of AI’s impact on democracy in an interdisciplinary effort by computer and social scientists.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2026-02-23},\n\tjournal = {Social Media + Society},\n\tauthor = {Jungherr, Andreas},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {20563051231186353},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The success and widespread deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) have raised awareness of the technology’s economic, social, and political consequences. Each new step in the development and application of AI is accompanied by speculations about a supposedly imminent but largely fictional artificial general intelligence (AGI) with (super-)human capacities, as seen in the unfolding discourse about capabilities and impact of large language models (LLMs) in the wake of ChatGPT. These far-reaching expectations lead to a discussion on the societal and political impact of AI that is largely dominated by unfocused fears and enthusiasms. In contrast, this article provides a framework for a more focused and productive analysis and discussion of AI’s likely impact on one specific social field: democracy. First, it is necessary to be clear about the workings of AI. This means differentiating between what is at present a largely imaginary AGI and narrow artificial intelligence focused on solving specific tasks. This distinction allows for a critical discussion of how AI affects different aspects of democracy, including its effects on the conditions of self-rule and people’s opportunities to exercise it, equality, the institution of elections, and competition between democratic and autocratic systems of government. This article shows that the consequences of today’s AI are more specific for democracy than broad speculation about AGI capabilities implies. Focusing on these specific aspects will account for actual threats and opportunities and thus allow for better monitoring of AI’s impact on democracy in an interdisciplinary effort by computer and social scientists.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Autopoietic Character of Society.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Demetis, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Systems Thinking, 3(1). 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{demetisAutopoieticCharacterSociety2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Autopoietic} {Character} of {Society}},\n\tvolume = {3},\n\tcopyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/},\n\tissn = {2767-3847},\n\turl = {https://scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.54120/jost.0000013},\n\tdoi = {10.54120/jost.0000013},\n\tabstract = {Following the articulation of the concept of autopoiesis in the biological realm by Maturana and Varela, this chapter introduces the basic principles and questions that led to the development of social autopoiesis. In exploring the developments around the autopoietic character of society, this chapter focuses on the core ideas behind Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory as an abstraction and expansion of the biologically-inspired autopoiesis. The central ideas around Luhmann’s decision to operationalise the system/environment distinction as a society/human distinction are discussed while the principles of the different function subsystems of society are outlined. A sample of applications that apply Luhmann’s ideas are provided and one of these cases is expanded.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2026-02-23},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Systems Thinking},\n\tauthor = {Demetis, Dionysios},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Following the articulation of the concept of autopoiesis in the biological realm by Maturana and Varela, this chapter introduces the basic principles and questions that led to the development of social autopoiesis. In exploring the developments around the autopoietic character of society, this chapter focuses on the core ideas behind Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory as an abstraction and expansion of the biologically-inspired autopoiesis. The central ideas around Luhmann’s decision to operationalise the system/environment distinction as a society/human distinction are discussed while the principles of the different function subsystems of society are outlined. A sample of applications that apply Luhmann’s ideas are provided and one of these cases is expanded.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Education in a Functionally Differentiated World Society.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vanderstraeten, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Mattei, P.; Dumay, X.; Mangez, E.; and Behrend, J., editor(s), The Oxford Handbook of Education and Globalization, pages 351–366. Oxford University Press, 1 edition, October 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"EducationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{mattei_education_2023,\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {Education in a {Functionally} {Differentiated} {World} {Society}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-19-757068-5 978-0-19-757071-5},\n\turl = {https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/52504/chapter/421534208},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197570685.013.45},\n\tabstract = {Abstract\n            This chapter provides an overview of systems-theoretical reflections on education in modern society. It focuses particularly on education as a function system in our world society. Building upon the theories of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann, three aspects of the sociohistorical evolution of this function system are discussed: the worldwide institutionalization of inclusion imperatives, the limits to professionalization processes, and the triggers of the rapid global expansion of higher education. In light of recent evolutions, also discussed is how the rapid expansion of participation in higher education in recent decades is changing the position and relevance of education in contemporary society. Attention is drawn to the forms of socio-geographical segregation and exclusion that are currently emerged between high- and low-schooled individuals in many parts of the world.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tbooktitle = {The {Oxford} {Handbook} of {Education} and {Globalization}},\n\tpublisher = {Oxford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Vanderstraeten, Raf},\n\teditor = {Mattei, Paola and Dumay, Xavier and Mangez, Eric and Behrend, Jacqueline},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {351--366},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Abstract This chapter provides an overview of systems-theoretical reflections on education in modern society. It focuses particularly on education as a function system in our world society. Building upon the theories of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann, three aspects of the sociohistorical evolution of this function system are discussed: the worldwide institutionalization of inclusion imperatives, the limits to professionalization processes, and the triggers of the rapid global expansion of higher education. In light of recent evolutions, also discussed is how the rapid expansion of participation in higher education in recent decades is changing the position and relevance of education in contemporary society. Attention is drawn to the forms of socio-geographical segregation and exclusion that are currently emerged between high- and low-schooled individuals in many parts of the world.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sociologías computacionales: desafíos pedagógicos con Gastón Becerra y Javier Blanco, UFLO, Argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"SociologíasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_sociologias_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Sociologías computacionales: desafíos pedagógicos con {Gastón} {Becerra} y {Javier} {Blanco}, {UFLO}, {Argentina}},\n\tvolume = {145},\n\tshorttitle = {"{Sociologías} computacionales},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fo0jsY3ZVI},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 145 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 145 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Autopoietic Character of Society.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Demetis, D. S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Systems Thinking,1–13. October 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{demetis_autopoietic_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Autopoietic} {Character} of {Society}},\n\tissn = {2767-3847},\n\turl = {https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.54120/jost.0000013},\n\tdoi = {10.54120/jost.0000013},\n\tabstract = {{\\textless}p class="first" dir="auto" id="d28874058e71"{\\textgreater}Following the articulation of the concept of autopoiesis in the biological realm by Maturana and Varela, this chapter introduces the basic principles and questions that led to the development of social autopoiesis. In exploring the developments around the autopoietic character of society, this chapter focuses on the core ideas behind Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory as an abstraction and expansion of the biologically-inspired autopoiesis. The central ideas around Luhmann’s decision to operationalise the system/environment distinction as a society/human distinction are discussed while the principles of the different function subsystems of society are outlined. A sample of applications that apply Luhmann’s ideas are provided and one of these cases is expanded. {\\textless}/p{\\textgreater}},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Systems Thinking},\n\tpublisher = {Cabrera Research Lab},\n\tauthor = {Demetis, Dionysios S.},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {1--13},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \\textlessp class=\"first\" dir=\"auto\" id=\"d28874058e71\"\\textgreaterFollowing the articulation of the concept of autopoiesis in the biological realm by Maturana and Varela, this chapter introduces the basic principles and questions that led to the development of social autopoiesis. In exploring the developments around the autopoietic character of society, this chapter focuses on the core ideas behind Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory as an abstraction and expansion of the biologically-inspired autopoiesis. The central ideas around Luhmann’s decision to operationalise the system/environment distinction as a society/human distinction are discussed while the principles of the different function subsystems of society are outlined. A sample of applications that apply Luhmann’s ideas are provided and one of these cases is expanded. \\textless/p\\textgreater\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Intelligent Framework to Support Technology and Business Specialists in the Public Sector.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pinheiro, Á. F.; Santos, W. B.; and Lima Neto, F. B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n IEEE Access, 11: 15655–15679. 2023.\n Conference Name: IEEE Access\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IntelligentPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pinheiro_intelligent_2023,\n\ttitle = {Intelligent {Framework} to {Support} {Technology} and {Business} {Specialists} in the {Public} {Sector}},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tissn = {2169-3536},\n\turl = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10040682},\n\tdoi = {10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3243195},\n\tabstract = {The development of intelligent routines to support complex decision-making is not always straight-forward. In the public service the difficulties may be related to the abundance of available data sources and the number of legal standards to be met, in addition to the need for the incorporation of transparency, auditability, standardization, and desirable reuse in the IT systems. This article presents the Domain Engineering process carried out to obtain a feature model for the implementation of a Framework that uses Artificial Intelligence for dealing with the governmental rules to support public decision-making. One highlight of the put forward framework is that it supports both, end users and IT people (i.e., experts in business and in technology), that are not experienced with intelligent techniques as well as it focuses on Compliance. For this research, the Design Science Research Methodology method was used, sorting the work into the steps of the problem identification and motivation, the definition of goals, the design and development, the verification and validation of the experiments, and the communication of the results. A systematic review identifying the lack of an AI Framework in the Public Sector was carried out beforehand. The research produced a Whitebox Framework aiming to supply recommendations for both groups of users based on solutions that have already been tested and applied to know problems in their respective areas, e.g., anomaly detection, fraud identification, rule extraction, and risk management, among others focused on Compliance. Moreover, the framework was built so that it can be evolved by experts with due use.},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {IEEE Access},\n\tauthor = {Pinheiro, Álvaro F. and Santos, Wylliams B. and Lima Neto, Fernando Buarque},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Conference Name: IEEE Access},\n\tkeywords = {Artificial intelligence, Bibliographies, Computational intelligence, Decision making, Decision support systems, Legislation, Protocols, Systematics, compliance in public sector, computational intelligence, decision support, domain engineering, framework},\n\tpages = {15655--15679},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The development of intelligent routines to support complex decision-making is not always straight-forward. In the public service the difficulties may be related to the abundance of available data sources and the number of legal standards to be met, in addition to the need for the incorporation of transparency, auditability, standardization, and desirable reuse in the IT systems. This article presents the Domain Engineering process carried out to obtain a feature model for the implementation of a Framework that uses Artificial Intelligence for dealing with the governmental rules to support public decision-making. One highlight of the put forward framework is that it supports both, end users and IT people (i.e., experts in business and in technology), that are not experienced with intelligent techniques as well as it focuses on Compliance. For this research, the Design Science Research Methodology method was used, sorting the work into the steps of the problem identification and motivation, the definition of goals, the design and development, the verification and validation of the experiments, and the communication of the results. A systematic review identifying the lack of an AI Framework in the Public Sector was carried out beforehand. The research produced a Whitebox Framework aiming to supply recommendations for both groups of users based on solutions that have already been tested and applied to know problems in their respective areas, e.g., anomaly detection, fraud identification, rule extraction, and risk management, among others focused on Compliance. Moreover, the framework was built so that it can be evolved by experts with due use.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Big Data, populismo, post verdad y polarización con José Manuel Robles, UCM. España.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"BigPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_big_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Big {Data}, populismo, post verdad y polarización con {José} {Manuel} {Robles}, {UCM}. {España}},\n\tvolume = {116},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAgi7iKSQaA},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 116. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 116. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n ¿Sistema-Mundo o Sociedad Mundial? Wallerstein-Luhmann con Juan Pablo Gonnet, CONICET, Argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"¿Sistema-MundoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_sistema-mundo_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {¿{Sistema}-{Mundo} o {Sociedad} {Mundial}? {Wallerstein}-{Luhmann} con {Juan} {Pablo} {Gonnet}, {CONICET}, {Argentina}},\n\tvolume = {133},\n\tshorttitle = {¿{Sistema}-{Mundo} o {Sociedad} {Mundial}?},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GmLu4xVelw},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 133. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.Analisis de problemas ...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 133. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.Analisis de problemas ...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Organización, decisión y algoritmos de inteligencia artificial con Carolina Busco, UDP, Chile.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Organización,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_organizacion_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Organización, decisión y algoritmos de inteligencia artificial con  {Carolina} {Busco}, {UDP}, {Chile}},\n\tvolume = {140},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sETHtX5Mhhs},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 140. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 140. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Decisiones Presentes, Riesgos Futuros con Osvaldo Dallera UBA Argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DecisionesPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_decisiones_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Decisiones {Presentes}, {Riesgos} {Futuros} con {Osvaldo} {Dallera} {UBA} {Argentina}},\n\tvolume = {144},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XFmkDoKvSs},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 144 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 144 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los algoritmos y la cientificidad de la medicina con Dominik Hofmann, Universidad de Bielefeld Alem.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LosPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_algoritmos_2023,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Los algoritmos y la cientificidad de la medicina con {Dominik} {Hofmann}, {Universidad} de {Bielefeld} {Alem}},\n\tvolume = {143},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJ9q2znk4tM},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 143 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 143 RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2022\n \n \n (18)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Effect of Attitudes by Generations X, Y, Z, Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta on Children.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fidan, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Yerdelen, B. K.; Elbeyoğlu, K.; Sirkeci, O.; Işıkçı, Y. M.; Grima, S.; and Dalli Gonzi, R. E., editor(s), Being a Child in a Global World: Childhood in an Environment of Violence, Terror, Migration and Rapid Change, pages 0. Emerald Publishing Limited, September 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{fidanEffectAttitudesGenerations2022,\n\ttitle = {The {Effect} of {Attitudes} by {Generations} {X}, {Y}, {Z}, {Alpha}, {Beta}, {Gamma} and {Delta} on {Children}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-80117-241-7},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-240-020221003},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/978-1-80117-240-020221003},\n\tabstract = {Our perception and analysis gradually grow and mature from subjectivity to objectivity as we investigate different periods of society and widen the temporal and spatial framework. The egocentric viewpoint is responsible for some of humanity's greatest mistakes and social crises throughout history. Without perceiving the ‘other’ and considering individuals who are different from them, societies will not be able to create permanent solutions. Although the answers offered are appropriate for one's own civilisation, when looking at the problem from a global perspective, it is extremely likely that there will be a significant incompatibility with other nations and societies. In this context, while our study advises a method of approaching social arrangements regardless of location, particularly time period, it also provides analysis. So much so that today's analysis differs from yesterday's, and tomorrow's will differ even more from today's. Today, more than 80\\% of the population lives in cities, and this trend is expected to continue. We find that the perceptions of the demands of generations x, y, z and alpha, living today in the same time period, for public goods and/or services, and the value they place on them, are considerably different in the demographic segment, which continues to develop and grow.Our study intends to explain, on a worldwide scale, how the value ascribed to events, objects and phenomena differentiate these perceptions through social observations and bilateral interviews with these people living simultaneously in an urban environment. Despite the fact that our research will define a geographical area as an urban area in terms of scope, it will also present examples of these urban areas from other countries throughout the world, putting the problem in a global context. Our sample comprises the major cities of the countries with the most people on each continent, whereas our study universe spans the entire globe. It is about observing the values given to these generations' perceptions of urban services in these capitals, ensuring that generations better understand each other based on these findings and reforming the production and presentation of urban goods and/or services based on these findings. Developed and emerging countries are the focus of our judgements and observations.},\n\turldate = {2026-08-03},\n\tbooktitle = {Being a {Child} in a {Global} {World}: {Childhood} in an {Environment} of {Violence}, {Terror}, {Migration} and {Rapid} {Change}},\n\tpublisher = {Emerald Publishing Limited},\n\tauthor = {Fidan, Ahmet},\n\teditor = {Yerdelen, Betül Karagöz and Elbeyoğlu, Kamuran and Sirkeci, Osman and Işıkçı, Yasemin Mamur and Grima, Simon and Dalli Gonzi, Rebecca E.},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {0},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Our perception and analysis gradually grow and mature from subjectivity to objectivity as we investigate different periods of society and widen the temporal and spatial framework. The egocentric viewpoint is responsible for some of humanity's greatest mistakes and social crises throughout history. Without perceiving the ‘other’ and considering individuals who are different from them, societies will not be able to create permanent solutions. Although the answers offered are appropriate for one's own civilisation, when looking at the problem from a global perspective, it is extremely likely that there will be a significant incompatibility with other nations and societies. In this context, while our study advises a method of approaching social arrangements regardless of location, particularly time period, it also provides analysis. So much so that today's analysis differs from yesterday's, and tomorrow's will differ even more from today's. Today, more than 80% of the population lives in cities, and this trend is expected to continue. We find that the perceptions of the demands of generations x, y, z and alpha, living today in the same time period, for public goods and/or services, and the value they place on them, are considerably different in the demographic segment, which continues to develop and grow.Our study intends to explain, on a worldwide scale, how the value ascribed to events, objects and phenomena differentiate these perceptions through social observations and bilateral interviews with these people living simultaneously in an urban environment. Despite the fact that our research will define a geographical area as an urban area in terms of scope, it will also present examples of these urban areas from other countries throughout the world, putting the problem in a global context. Our sample comprises the major cities of the countries with the most people on each continent, whereas our study universe spans the entire globe. It is about observing the values given to these generations' perceptions of urban services in these capitals, ensuring that generations better understand each other based on these findings and reforming the production and presentation of urban goods and/or services based on these findings. Developed and emerging countries are the focus of our judgements and observations.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicação artificial? A produção de contingência por algoritmos: A produção de contingência por algoritmos.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Esposito, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito, 9(1): 4–21. January 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaçãoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{esposito_comunicacao_2022,\n\ttitle = {Comunicação artificial? {A} produção de contingência por algoritmos: {A} produção de contingência por algoritmos},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tcopyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0},\n\tissn = {2359-5582},\n\tshorttitle = {Comunicação artificial?},\n\turl = {https://revista.abrasd.com.br/index.php/rbsd/article/view/638},\n\tdoi = {10.21910/rbsd.v9i1.638},\n\tabstract = {O discurso sobre algoritmos inteligentes e agentes sociais digitais ainda se refere principalmente à construção de uma inteligência artificial que reproduz faculdades de indivíduos. No entanto, desenvolvimentos recentes mostram que os algoritmos são mais eficientes quando abandonam esse objetivo e, em vez disso, tentam reproduzir a capacidade de comunicação. Algoritmos, que não “pensam” como pessoas, podem provocar alterações na capacidade de se obter e processar informações na sociedade. Recorrendo ao conceito de comunicação da teoria dos sistemas sociais de Niklas Luhmann, este artigo reconstrói, criticamente, o debate sobre a guinada computacional do big data, atribuindo-lhe o sentido de uma reprodução artificial da comunicação, e não da inteligência. Algoritmos capazes de autoaprendizagem parasitariamente tiram vantagem, seja consciente ou inconscientemente, da contribuição dos usuários da web para uma “dupla contingência virtual”. Isso abastece a sociedade com informações que não fazem parte do pensamento de ninguém. No entanto, elas entram no circuito comunicativo social, aumentando sua complexidade. O conceito de comunicação deve ser reconsiderado, a fim de levar em conta esses desenvolvimentos, incluindo (ou não) a possibilidade de comunicação com algoritmos.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2026-02-19},\n\tjournal = {Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito},\n\tauthor = {Esposito, Elena},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpages = {4--21},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n O discurso sobre algoritmos inteligentes e agentes sociais digitais ainda se refere principalmente à construção de uma inteligência artificial que reproduz faculdades de indivíduos. No entanto, desenvolvimentos recentes mostram que os algoritmos são mais eficientes quando abandonam esse objetivo e, em vez disso, tentam reproduzir a capacidade de comunicação. Algoritmos, que não “pensam” como pessoas, podem provocar alterações na capacidade de se obter e processar informações na sociedade. Recorrendo ao conceito de comunicação da teoria dos sistemas sociais de Niklas Luhmann, este artigo reconstrói, criticamente, o debate sobre a guinada computacional do big data, atribuindo-lhe o sentido de uma reprodução artificial da comunicação, e não da inteligência. Algoritmos capazes de autoaprendizagem parasitariamente tiram vantagem, seja consciente ou inconscientemente, da contribuição dos usuários da web para uma “dupla contingência virtual”. Isso abastece a sociedade com informações que não fazem parte do pensamento de ninguém. No entanto, elas entram no circuito comunicativo social, aumentando sua complexidade. O conceito de comunicação deve ser reconsiderado, a fim de levar em conta esses desenvolvimentos, incluindo (ou não) a possibilidade de comunicação com algoritmos.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Materiality and Autonomy Big Data in the Education System.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Tække, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 29(3-4): 121–140. November 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"MaterialityPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{taekke_materiality_2022,\n\ttitle = {Materiality and {Autonomy} {Big} {Data} in the {Education} {System}},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tissn = {0907-0877},\n\turl = {https://pure.au.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/353304080/Materiality_and_Autonomy_Big_Data_in_the_Education_System_Accepted_manuscript.pdf},\n\tabstract = {Technological developments, especially machine learning algorithms, big data, profiling and\nmicrotargeting, seem to have had a huge effect on society in recent years. According to Luhmann’s\nsociological systems theory, society is functionally differentiated, and all societal systems are\noperationally closed to each other, each concerned with its own autopoiesis. Until recently, the forms\nof communication used by social systems to (re)produce themselves have been analogue in nature.\nHowever, with the arrival of digital media the materiality of communication has changed. The\nquestion posed in this article is whether this new materiality entails any risk in terms of the closure\nof social systems. To answer this question, the article mainly uses Luhmann’s systems theory, but it\nalso uses media theories and a synthesis between the two theoretical traditions to grasp the\nmateriality of communication. The concrete case used in this endeavour is the education system in\nthe Anglo-American world, following Williamson (2017), and the article tries to determine whether\nthe logics, values and elementary communication contributions of other systems can enter the\ncommunication of the education system on the level of interaction systems, organization systems\nand functional systems. The paper concludes that the materiality of digital media might result in an\nalgorithmically induced impact on communication in the education system enforced by other\nsystems in its environment, resulting in a threat to the autonomy of the education system.\nKeywords: Education, big data, systems theory, Luhmann, medium theory.},\n\tnumber = {3-4},\n\tjournal = {Cybernetics and Human Knowing},\n\tauthor = {Tække, Jesper},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {digitale medier, funktionssystemer, materialitet, systemteori, undervisning},\n\tpages = {121--140},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Technological developments, especially machine learning algorithms, big data, profiling and microtargeting, seem to have had a huge effect on society in recent years. According to Luhmann’s sociological systems theory, society is functionally differentiated, and all societal systems are operationally closed to each other, each concerned with its own autopoiesis. Until recently, the forms of communication used by social systems to (re)produce themselves have been analogue in nature. However, with the arrival of digital media the materiality of communication has changed. The question posed in this article is whether this new materiality entails any risk in terms of the closure of social systems. To answer this question, the article mainly uses Luhmann’s systems theory, but it also uses media theories and a synthesis between the two theoretical traditions to grasp the materiality of communication. The concrete case used in this endeavour is the education system in the Anglo-American world, following Williamson (2017), and the article tries to determine whether the logics, values and elementary communication contributions of other systems can enter the communication of the education system on the level of interaction systems, organization systems and functional systems. The paper concludes that the materiality of digital media might result in an algorithmically induced impact on communication in the education system enforced by other systems in its environment, resulting in a threat to the autonomy of the education system. Keywords: Education, big data, systems theory, Luhmann, medium theory.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Is There a Trade-Off Between Human Autonomy and the ‘Autonomy’ of AI Systems?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Prunkl, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Müller, V. C., editor(s), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2021, volume 63, pages 67–71. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022.\n Series Title: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"IsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{muller_is_2022,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\ttitle = {Is {There} a {Trade}-{Off} {Between} {Human} {Autonomy} and the ‘{Autonomy}’ of {AI} {Systems}?},\n\tvolume = {63},\n\tisbn = {978-3-031-09152-0 978-3-031-09153-7},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-09153-7_6},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-031-09153-7_6},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tbooktitle = {Philosophy and {Theory} of {Artificial} {Intelligence} 2021},\n\tpublisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n\tauthor = {Prunkl, Carina},\n\teditor = {Müller, Vincent C.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Series Title: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics},\n\tpages = {67--71},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Strictly Human: Limitations of Autonomous Systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Soltanzadeh, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Minds and Machines, 32(2): 269–288. June 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"StrictlyPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{soltanzadeh_strictly_2022,\n\ttitle = {Strictly {Human}: {Limitations} of {Autonomous} {Systems}},\n\tvolume = {32},\n\tissn = {1572-8641},\n\tshorttitle = {Strictly {Human}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09582-7},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11023-021-09582-7},\n\tabstract = {Can autonomous systems replace humans in the performance of their activities? How does the answer to this question inform the design of autonomous systems?  The study of technical systems and their features should be preceded by the study of the activities in which they play roles. Each activity can be described by its overall goals, governing norms and the intermediate steps which are taken to achieve the goals and to follow the norms. This paper uses the activity realist approach to conceptualize autonomous systems in the context of human activities. By doing so, it first argues for epistemic and logical conditions that illustrate the limitations of autonomous systems in tasks which they can and cannot perform, and then, it discusses the ramifications of the limitations of system autonomy on the design of autonomous systems.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {Minds and Machines},\n\tauthor = {Soltanzadeh, Sadjad},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tkeywords = {Activity realism, Design, Objectivity, Regulation, System autonomy},\n\tpages = {269--288},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Can autonomous systems replace humans in the performance of their activities? How does the answer to this question inform the design of autonomous systems?  The study of technical systems and their features should be preceded by the study of the activities in which they play roles. Each activity can be described by its overall goals, governing norms and the intermediate steps which are taken to achieve the goals and to follow the norms. This paper uses the activity realist approach to conceptualize autonomous systems in the context of human activities. By doing so, it first argues for epistemic and logical conditions that illustrate the limitations of autonomous systems in tasks which they can and cannot perform, and then, it discusses the ramifications of the limitations of system autonomy on the design of autonomous systems.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Atlas de inteligencia artificial: poder, política y costos planetarios.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Krawford, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Fonde de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 1a en Español edition, 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AtlasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{krawford_atlas_2022,\n\taddress = {Buenos Aires},\n\tedition = {1a en Español},\n\ttitle = {Atlas de inteligencia artificial: poder, política y costos planetarios},\n\tisbn = {978-987-719-369-5},\n\turl = {https://www.fce.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Atlas-de-inteligencia-artificial_adelanto.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Fonde de Cultura Económica},\n\tauthor = {Krawford, Kate},\n\ttranslator = {Diaz Klaassen, Francisco},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicação artificial? A produção de contingência por algoritmos: A produção de contingência por algoritmos.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Esposito, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito, 9(1): 4–21. January 2022.\n Number: 1\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaçãoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{esposito_comunicacao_2022,\n\ttitle = {Comunicação artificial? {A} produção de contingência por algoritmos: {A} produção de contingência por algoritmos},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2021 Autor e ABraSD},\n\tissn = {2359-5582},\n\tshorttitle = {Comunicação artificial?},\n\turl = {https://revista.abrasd.com.br/index.php/rbsd/article/view/638},\n\tdoi = {10.21910/rbsd.v9i1.638},\n\tabstract = {Discourse about smart algorithms and digital social agents still refers primarily to the construction of artificial intelligence that reproduces the faculties of individuals. Recent developments, however, show that algorithms are more efficient when they abandon this goal and try instead to reproduce the ability to communicate. Algorithms that do not “think” like people can affect the ability to obtain and process information in society. Referring to the concept of communication in Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, this paper critically reconstructs the debate on the computational turn of big data as the artificial reproduction not of intelligence but of communication. Self-learning algorithms parasitically take advantage – be it consciously or unaware – of the contribution of web users to a “virtual double contingency.” This provides society with information that is not part of the thoughts of anyone, but, nevertheless, enters the communication circuit and raises its complexity. The concept of communication should be reconsidered to take account of these developments, including (or not) the possibility of communicating with algorithms.},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-02-21},\n\tjournal = {Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito},\n\tauthor = {Esposito, Elena},\n\ttranslator = {Costa, Antônio Luz and Stamford, Artur da Silva},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tkeywords = {Teoria dos sistemas, algoritmos sociais, big data, deep learning, dupla contingência, inteligência artificial, redes neurais},\n\tpages = {4--21},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Discourse about smart algorithms and digital social agents still refers primarily to the construction of artificial intelligence that reproduces the faculties of individuals. Recent developments, however, show that algorithms are more efficient when they abandon this goal and try instead to reproduce the ability to communicate. Algorithms that do not “think” like people can affect the ability to obtain and process information in society. Referring to the concept of communication in Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, this paper critically reconstructs the debate on the computational turn of big data as the artificial reproduction not of intelligence but of communication. Self-learning algorithms parasitically take advantage – be it consciously or unaware – of the contribution of web users to a “virtual double contingency.” This provides society with information that is not part of the thoughts of anyone, but, nevertheless, enters the communication circuit and raises its complexity. The concept of communication should be reconsidered to take account of these developments, including (or not) the possibility of communicating with algorithms.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The impact of artificial intelligence in society through the lens of Luhmann’s social systems theory: a systematic review.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Simões, G.; Radosavljevic, M.; and Johnston\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Manchester, United Kingdom, 2022. Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{simoes_impact_2022,\n\taddress = {Manchester, United Kingdom},\n\ttitle = {The impact of artificial intelligence in society through the lens of {Luhmann}’s social systems theory: a systematic review},\n\turl = {https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/18382/},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tpublisher = {Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester},\n\tauthor = {Simões, Gisele and Radosavljevic, Milan and Johnston},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Differentiation and World Society. A Note on the Theory of Society by Niklas Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kurtz, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Sociological Research, 13(2): 1–13. July 2022.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DifferentiationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kurtz_differentiation_2022,\n\ttitle = {Differentiation and {World} {Society}. {A} {Note} on the {Theory} of {Society} by {Niklas} {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Kurtz},\n\tissn = {1948-5468},\n\turl = {https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsr/article/view/20124},\n\tdoi = {10.5296/jsr.v13i2.20124},\n\tabstract = {The topic of this essay is Niklas Luhmann‘s theory of society and, in particular, the relationship between differentiation and world society. Based on a reconstruction of the concept of differentiation in systems theory, the form of societal differentiation, and the distinction between primary and secondary forms of differentiation, this paper highlights a weakness of the theory and asks how its abstract level of analysis could be made more connectable to other theories of society. The suggestion is to focus more on the segmentary subdifferentiations of society-wide differentiated function systems in the world society.},\n\tlanguage = {en-US},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Sociological Research},\n\tauthor = {Kurtz, Thomas},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tpages = {1--13},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The topic of this essay is Niklas Luhmann‘s theory of society and, in particular, the relationship between differentiation and world society. Based on a reconstruction of the concept of differentiation in systems theory, the form of societal differentiation, and the distinction between primary and secondary forms of differentiation, this paper highlights a weakness of the theory and asks how its abstract level of analysis could be made more connectable to other theories of society. The suggestion is to focus more on the segmentary subdifferentiations of society-wide differentiated function systems in the world society.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicación digital: definición operativa y aproximación a la participación bajo la forma inclusión/exclusión digital: Definición operativa y aproximación a la participación bajo la forma inclusión/exclusión digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Pignuoli Ocampo, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (46): 70–83. October 2022.\n Number: 46\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{pignuoli_ocampo_comunicacion_2022,\n\ttitle = {Comunicación digital: definición operativa y aproximación a la participación bajo la forma inclusión/exclusión digital: {Definición} operativa y aproximación a la participación bajo la forma inclusión/exclusión digital},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor 2022},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\tshorttitle = {Comunicación digital},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/68542},\n\tabstract = {This paper elaborates a definition of digital communication as an operative unit via reviewing technical and sociological conditions triggered by the emergence of digital media. Examining and comparing general and particular aspects of the communicative synthesis with the broad model of communication proposed by Niklas Luhmann, an operational definition of digital communication is proposed, and ultimately tested through an initial analysis of the rearrangement of the participation conditions in communication. To achieve the latter, an exploration of the methodological link between the analysis of the participation conditions and the inclusion/exclusion distinction is conducted, which is, in turn, adjusted for the research of communication technologies and propagation media.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {46},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Pignuoli Ocampo, Sergio},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 46},\n\tkeywords = {Inclusión/Exclusión},\n\tpages = {70--83},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper elaborates a definition of digital communication as an operative unit via reviewing technical and sociological conditions triggered by the emergence of digital media. Examining and comparing general and particular aspects of the communicative synthesis with the broad model of communication proposed by Niklas Luhmann, an operational definition of digital communication is proposed, and ultimately tested through an initial analysis of the rearrangement of the participation conditions in communication. To achieve the latter, an exploration of the methodological link between the analysis of the participation conditions and the inclusion/exclusion distinction is conducted, which is, in turn, adjusted for the research of communication technologies and propagation media.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Like/dislike como metacódigo moral e acelerador social.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Costa, A. L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Latitude, 16(2): 29–52. April 2022.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Like/dislikePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{costa_likedislike_2022,\n\ttitle = {Like/dislike como metacódigo moral e acelerador social},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2022},\n\tissn = {2179-5428},\n\turl = {https://www.seer.ufal.br/index.php/latitude/article/view/13723},\n\tdoi = {10.28998/lte.2022.n.2.13723},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Latitude},\n\tauthor = {Costa, Antônio Luz},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tkeywords = {Algoritmos., Luhmann, Moral, Tempo, Teoria dos sistemas sociais},\n\tpages = {29--52},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Algoritmos de inteligência artificial e decisão jurídica: o caso da ELIS do Tribunal de Justiça de Pernambuco.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Stamford da Silva, A.; and Luckwu, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da Primeira Região, 34(3): 26–42. December 2022.\n Number: 3\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AlgoritmosPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{stamford_da_silva_algoritmos_2022,\n\ttitle = {Algoritmos de inteligência artificial e decisão jurídica: o caso da {ELIS} do {Tribunal} de {Justiça} de {Pernambuco}},\n\tvolume = {34},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região},\n\tissn = {2596-2493},\n\tshorttitle = {Algoritmos de inteligência artificial e decisão jurídica},\n\turl = {https://revista.trf1.jus.br/trf1/article/view/435},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da Primeira Região},\n\tauthor = {Stamford da Silva, Artur and Luckwu, Myllena},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {Number: 3},\n\tkeywords = {algoritmo, decisão judicial, inteligência artificial, teoria dos sistemas},\n\tpages = {26--42},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hacia una Teoría Primitiva del Sentido con Gabriel Vélez Cuartas, Universidad Antioquia, Colombia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"HaciaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_hacia_2022,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Hacia una {Teoría} {Primitiva} del {Sentido} con {Gabriel} {Vélez} {Cuartas}, {Universidad} {Antioquia}, {Colombia}},\n\tvolume = {80},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXN0hEnB8g},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad  CONFERENCIA 80, RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.Instituto d...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad CONFERENCIA 80, RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad.Instituto d...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los sistemas complejos en el siglo XXI con Alfredo Spilzinger, Santa Fe Associates International.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LosPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_sistemas_2022,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Los sistemas complejos en el siglo {XXI} con {Alfredo} {Spilzinger}, {Santa} {Fe} {Associates} {International}},\n\tvolume = {105},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orp6-pLn1VE},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad  CONFERENCIA 105. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Lu...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad CONFERENCIA 105. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas Lu...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicación digital con Sergio Pignuolli, CONICET-UBA. Argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_comunicacion_2022,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Comunicación digital con {Sergio} {Pignuolli}, {CONICET}-{UBA}. {Argentina}},\n\tvolume = {111},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qijrTh-fUZI},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad,  Presentacion del prefacio 111. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complej...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, Presentacion del prefacio 111. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complej...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Comunicación artificial, los algoritmos como socios de interacción, y predictores de futuro con Domonik Hofmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ComunicaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_comunicacion_2022,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {Comunicación artificial, los algoritmos como socios de interacción, y predictores de futuro con {Domonik} {Hofmann}},\n\tvolume = {113},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7SYdO4Fino},\n\tabstract = {Grupo de trabajo "Ciencia, saber y conocimiento" de la RELASSC, 113“Comunicación artificial, los algoritmos como socios de interacción, productores de inteli...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Grupo de trabajo \"Ciencia, saber y conocimiento\" de la RELASSC, 113“Comunicación artificial, los algoritmos como socios de interacción, productores de inteli...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El futuro abierto en una época algorítmica con Elena Esposito, Universidades de Bielefeld y Bolonia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sedano, C.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{sedano_futuro_2022,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {El futuro abierto en una época algorítmica con {Elena} {Esposito}, {Universidades} de {Bielefeld} y {Bolonia}},\n\tvolume = {113},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_NGNhWh_dA},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 113. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas LuhmannCoordin...},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {YouTube},\n\tauthor = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad, 113. RELASSC, Red Latinomericana de Sistemas Sociales y Complejidad. Niklas LuhmannCoordin...\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Artificial Communication: How Algorithms Produce Social Intelligence.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Esposito, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The MIT Press, May 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ArtificialPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{esposito_artificial_2022,\n\ttitle = {Artificial {Communication}: {How} {Algorithms} {Produce} {Social} {Intelligence}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-262-36886-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Artificial {Communication}},\n\turl = {https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/5338/Artificial-CommunicationHow-Algorithms-Produce},\n\tdoi = {10.7551/mitpress/14189.001.0001},\n\tabstract = {A proposal that we think about digital technologies such as machine learning not in terms of artificial intelligence but as artificial communication.Algori},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tpublisher = {The MIT Press},\n\tauthor = {Esposito, Elena},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n A proposal that we think about digital technologies such as machine learning not in terms of artificial intelligence but as artificial communication.Algori\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2021\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El Sistema Político de Niklas Luhmann. Dr. Javier Torres Nafarrete, Universidad Iberoamericana.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n May 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{carlossedanoSistemaPoliticoNiklas2021,\n\ttitle = {El {Sistema} {Político} de {Niklas} {Luhmann}. {Dr}. {Javier} {Torres} {Nafarrete}, {Universidad} {Iberoamericana}},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t29D2bEEUvE},\n\tabstract = {Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad 40, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Departamento de Sociología, UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA. Niklas Luhmann},\n\turldate = {2026-02-23},\n\tcollaborator = {Sedano, Carlos},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2021},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Seminario internacional de sistemas sociales, redes y complejidad 40, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Departamento de Sociología, UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA. Niklas Luhmann\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Worlds apart? On Niklas Luhmann and the sociology of education.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mangez, E.; and Vanden Broeck, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n European Educational Research Journal, 20(6): 705–718. November 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WorldsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{mangez_worlds_2021,\n\ttitle = {Worlds apart? {On} {Niklas} {Luhmann} and the sociology of education},\n\tvolume = {20},\n\tissn = {1474-9041, 1474-9041},\n\tshorttitle = {Worlds apart?},\n\turl = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14749041211041867},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/14749041211041867},\n\tabstract = {In an effort to address the relationship between globalisation, education and Niklas Luhmann’s branch of systems theory, we present his essay, published here for the first time in English translation, ‘Education: Forming the life course’, next to the nine contributions that compose this special issue and build on this and his other writings to take up the theme of education in world society. To conclude, we underline that systems theory’s emphasis on functional differentiation helps to address two lacunae in the today prevailing sociological practice. By positing the development of self-referential domains as modernity’s central mode of differentiation, it provides sociology with a comprehensive theory of world society. By the same token, it also allows one to observe education as a global affair with, so to speak, a life of its own.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2026-02-09},\n\tjournal = {European Educational Research Journal},\n\tauthor = {Mangez, Eric and Vanden Broeck, Pieter},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {705--718},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In an effort to address the relationship between globalisation, education and Niklas Luhmann’s branch of systems theory, we present his essay, published here for the first time in English translation, ‘Education: Forming the life course’, next to the nine contributions that compose this special issue and build on this and his other writings to take up the theme of education in world society. To conclude, we underline that systems theory’s emphasis on functional differentiation helps to address two lacunae in the today prevailing sociological practice. By positing the development of self-referential domains as modernity’s central mode of differentiation, it provides sociology with a comprehensive theory of world society. By the same token, it also allows one to observe education as a global affair with, so to speak, a life of its own.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Worlds apart? On Niklas Luhmann and the sociology of education.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Mangez, E.; and Vanden Broeck, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n European Educational Research Journal, 20(6): 705–718. November 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WorldsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{mangez_worlds_2021,\n\ttitle = {Worlds apart? {On} {Niklas} {Luhmann} and the sociology of education},\n\tvolume = {20},\n\tissn = {1474-9041},\n\tshorttitle = {Worlds apart?},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211041867},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/14749041211041867},\n\tabstract = {In an effort to address the relationship between globalisation, education and Niklas Luhmann’s branch of systems theory, we present his essay, published here for the first time in English translation, ‘Education: Forming the life course’, next to the nine contributions that compose this special issue and build on this and his other writings to take up the theme of education in world society. To conclude, we underline that systems theory’s emphasis on functional differentiation helps to address two lacunae in the today prevailing sociological practice. By positing the development of self-referential domains as modernity’s central mode of differentiation, it provides sociology with a comprehensive theory of world society. By the same token, it also allows one to observe education as a global affair with, so to speak, a life of its own.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tjournal = {European Educational Research Journal},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications},\n\tauthor = {Mangez, Eric and Vanden Broeck, Pieter},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {705--718},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In an effort to address the relationship between globalisation, education and Niklas Luhmann’s branch of systems theory, we present his essay, published here for the first time in English translation, ‘Education: Forming the life course’, next to the nine contributions that compose this special issue and build on this and his other writings to take up the theme of education in world society. To conclude, we underline that systems theory’s emphasis on functional differentiation helps to address two lacunae in the today prevailing sociological practice. By positing the development of self-referential domains as modernity’s central mode of differentiation, it provides sociology with a comprehensive theory of world society. By the same token, it also allows one to observe education as a global affair with, so to speak, a life of its own.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Notas para una teoría primitiva del sentido.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vélez Cuartas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Cómbita, J. L.; and Maldonado, C. E., editor(s), Biología teórica, explicaciones y complejidad, pages 465–503. Universidad del Bosque, Bogotá, 1 edition, February 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"NotasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{velez_cuartas_notas_2021,\n\taddress = {Bogotá},\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {Notas para una teoría primitiva del sentido},\n\tisbn = {978-958-739-220-3},\n\turl = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351009677_Notas_para_una_teoria_primitiva_del_sentido},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/jj.5329328.14},\n\tabstract = {El concepto de sentido desborda nuevamente el terreno de las humanidades, si consideramos que, por ejemplo, la semiótica ya había planteado en el siglo xx la importancia de su utilización en el campo de la biología (Martinelli, 2007). Hoy, los últimos desarrollos en inteligencia artificial y analítica de datos incluyen desarrollos importantes en el campo de las redes semánticas, y por tanto una problematización del sentido desde el punto de vista de las máquinas. Uno de los retos en la construcción de algoritmos computacionales es la modelación matemática de las operaciones que generan sentido (Gómez et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Ahmadi et al., 2018). En el marco de estos desarrollos se pueden proponer dos discusiones: la comprensión de los mecanismos básicos que permiten la emergencia de sentido, y el sentido mismo de la automatización de la vida cotidiana.},\n\tlanguage = {Espanol},\n\tbooktitle = {Biología teórica, explicaciones y complejidad},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad del Bosque},\n\tauthor = {Vélez Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\teditor = {Cómbita, José Luis and Maldonado, Carlos Eduardo},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {465--503},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El concepto de sentido desborda nuevamente el terreno de las humanidades, si consideramos que, por ejemplo, la semiótica ya había planteado en el siglo xx la importancia de su utilización en el campo de la biología (Martinelli, 2007). Hoy, los últimos desarrollos en inteligencia artificial y analítica de datos incluyen desarrollos importantes en el campo de las redes semánticas, y por tanto una problematización del sentido desde el punto de vista de las máquinas. Uno de los retos en la construcción de algoritmos computacionales es la modelación matemática de las operaciones que generan sentido (Gómez et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Ahmadi et al., 2018). En el marco de estos desarrollos se pueden proponer dos discusiones: la comprensión de los mecanismos básicos que permiten la emergencia de sentido, y el sentido mismo de la automatización de la vida cotidiana.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los desafíos del big data para la formación sociológica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Becerra, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Buenos Aires, 2021. UFLO Universidad\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LosPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{becerra_desafios_2021,\n\taddress = {Buenos Aires},\n\ttitle = {Los desafíos del big data para la formación sociológica},\n\turl = {https://jornadas.virtual.uflo.edu.ar/?p=2410},\n\tabstract = {Este trabajo busca indagar la manera en que la sociología ha problematizado al big data, reconstruyendo distintos momentos de su reflexión e identificando los desafíos asumidos. Particularmente, nos referimos a 3 desafíos: en primer lugar, el metodológico, vinculado con la actualización de diseños y técnicas de investigación; en segundo lugar, el epistemológico y teórico, relativo a la reflexión de los criterios y expectativas del conocimiento que se produce en la era del big data y su trasfondo social; y en tercer lugar, al crítico y ético, desde el que se constata que el big data y su implementación en algoritmos sociales pueden reproducir inequidades y desigualdades, frente a las cuales los sociólogos y sociólogas tenemos mucho que aportar. Luego, a partir de este diagnóstico, se señalan algunos lineamientos para la formación de futuros sociólogos y sociólogas.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tpublisher = {UFLO Universidad},\n\tauthor = {Becerra, Gastón},\n\tyear = {2021},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Este trabajo busca indagar la manera en que la sociología ha problematizado al big data, reconstruyendo distintos momentos de su reflexión e identificando los desafíos asumidos. Particularmente, nos referimos a 3 desafíos: en primer lugar, el metodológico, vinculado con la actualización de diseños y técnicas de investigación; en segundo lugar, el epistemológico y teórico, relativo a la reflexión de los criterios y expectativas del conocimiento que se produce en la era del big data y su trasfondo social; y en tercer lugar, al crítico y ético, desde el que se constata que el big data y su implementación en algoritmos sociales pueden reproducir inequidades y desigualdades, frente a las cuales los sociólogos y sociólogas tenemos mucho que aportar. Luego, a partir de este diagnóstico, se señalan algunos lineamientos para la formación de futuros sociólogos y sociólogas.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n How does education function?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vanderstraeten, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n European Educational Research Journal, 20(6): 729–739. November 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"HowPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{vanderstraeten_how_2021,\n\ttitle = {How does education function?},\n\tvolume = {20},\n\tissn = {1474-9041},\n\turl = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474904120948979},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/1474904120948979},\n\tabstract = {Niklas Luhmann speaks of the function of education in relation to modern society. Only within modern society, he argues, is it possible to speak of the differentiation of a specific function system of education. It is, more particularly, the differentiation of other function systems that leads to the question about the function of education. I look closely at Luhmann’s analyses of the function of education and make a plea for a socio-historical approach, which looks at the ways in which education “functions” within society. Depending on the situation, beliefs in the functionality of education have given form to specific characteristics of the contemporary world society.},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {European Educational Research Journal},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications},\n\tauthor = {Vanderstraeten, Raf},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Niklas Luhmann, educational system, functional differentiation, systems theory, world society},\n\tpages = {729--739},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Niklas Luhmann speaks of the function of education in relation to modern society. Only within modern society, he argues, is it possible to speak of the differentiation of a specific function system of education. It is, more particularly, the differentiation of other function systems that leads to the question about the function of education. I look closely at Luhmann’s analyses of the function of education and make a plea for a socio-historical approach, which looks at the ways in which education “functions” within society. Depending on the situation, beliefs in the functionality of education have given form to specific characteristics of the contemporary world society.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Four pillars of Luhmann’s analytical apparatus: Applications for communication research.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sohn, Y.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Studies in Communication Sciences, 21(2): 207–224. December 2021.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FourPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{sohn_four_2021,\n\ttitle = {Four pillars of {Luhmann}’s analytical apparatus: {Applications} for communication research},\n\tvolume = {21},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2021 YJ Sohn},\n\tissn = {2296-4150},\n\tshorttitle = {Four pillars of {Luhmann}’s analytical apparatus},\n\turl = {https://www.hope.uzh.ch/scoms/article/view/2450},\n\tdoi = {10.24434/j.scoms.2021.02.002},\n\tabstract = {By extending Andersen’s (2003) propositions, the current paper formalizes Luhmann’s four fundamental analytical frameworks and proposes a model that delineates the relations among them. That is, with the form analysis as the base framework, observation analysis is considered the social extension of form analysis as it involves the distinction observer / observed or ego / alter. Differentiation analysis is described as the factual extension of form as it distinguishes a system (this) and everything else (in its environment). Finally, semantic analysis is considered the temporal extension of form analysis as it focuses on the condensation of meaning over time. In addition, to overcome the abstractness of descriptions in the existing literature, this paper suggests the workable definitions that operationalize the analytical frames. Rich research examples are also presented to demonstrate the broad applicability of the four frameworks in communication research and their analytical gains. These theory-driven analytical frameworks are expected to provide meaningful connections between empirical data and theories, thereby enriching the field of communication research. In turn, more empirical applications will contribute to Luhmann’s systems theory by bringing in productive insights.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Studies in Communication Sciences},\n\tauthor = {Sohn, Youngju},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tkeywords = {Niklas Luhmann, analytical frameworks, communication research, differentiation analysis, form analysis, observation analysis, semantic analysis, systems theory},\n\tpages = {207--224},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n By extending Andersen’s (2003) propositions, the current paper formalizes Luhmann’s four fundamental analytical frameworks and proposes a model that delineates the relations among them. That is, with the form analysis as the base framework, observation analysis is considered the social extension of form analysis as it involves the distinction observer / observed or ego / alter. Differentiation analysis is described as the factual extension of form as it distinguishes a system (this) and everything else (in its environment). Finally, semantic analysis is considered the temporal extension of form analysis as it focuses on the condensation of meaning over time. In addition, to overcome the abstractness of descriptions in the existing literature, this paper suggests the workable definitions that operationalize the analytical frames. Rich research examples are also presented to demonstrate the broad applicability of the four frameworks in communication research and their analytical gains. These theory-driven analytical frameworks are expected to provide meaningful connections between empirical data and theories, thereby enriching the field of communication research. In turn, more empirical applications will contribute to Luhmann’s systems theory by bringing in productive insights.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Decisão Jurídica na Comunicativação.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Stamford da Silva, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Almedina, Brasil, 1 edition, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DecisãoPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{stamford_da_silva_decisao_2021,\n\taddress = {Brasil},\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {Decisão {Jurídica} na {Comunicativação}},\n\tisbn = {9786556271613},\n\turl = {https://pt.bookmate.com/books/rmsKi6Ah},\n\tlanguage = {pt-BR},\n\tpublisher = {Almedina},\n\tauthor = {Stamford da Silva, Artur},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Direito, Hermenêutica, Jurídica, argumentação, comunicabilidade, comunicativação, decisão, judiciária, jurídica., teoria},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2019\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n What is the ‘Social’ in Climate Change Research? A Case Study on Scientific Representations from Chile.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Billi, M.; Blanco, G.; and Urquiza, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Minerva, 57(3): 293–315. September 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WhatPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{billi_what_2019,\n\ttitle = {What is the ‘{Social}’ in {Climate} {Change} {Research}? {A} {Case} {Study} on {Scientific} {Representations} from {Chile}},\n\tvolume = {57},\n\tissn = {1573-1871},\n\tshorttitle = {What is the ‘{Social}’ in {Climate} {Change} {Research}?},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09369-2},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11024-019-09369-2},\n\tabstract = {Over the last few decades climate change has been gaining importance in international scientific and political debates. However, the social sciences, especially in Latin America, have only lately become interested in the subject and their approach is still vague. Scientific understanding of global environmental change and the process of designing public policies to face them are characterized by their complexity as well as by epistemic and normative uncertainties. This makes it necessary to problematize the way in which research efforts understand ‘the social’ of climate change. How do ‘the climate’ and ‘the social’ interpenetrate as scientific objects? What does the resulting field look like? Is the combination capable of promoting reflexivity and collaboration on the issue, or does it merely become dispersed with diffuse boundaries? Our paper seeks to answer these and other related questions using Chile as a case study and examining peer-reviewed scientific research on the topic. By combining in-depth qualitative content analysis of each paper with a statistical meta-analysis, we were able to: characterize the key content and forms of such literature; identify divisions and patterns within it; and, discuss some factors and trends that may help explain these. We conclude that the literature displays two competing trends: while it is inclined to become fragmented beyond the scope of the ‘mitigation’ black box, it also tends to cluster along the lines of methodological distinctions traditionally contested within the social sciences. This, in turn, highlights the persistence of disciplinary divisions within an allegedly interdisciplinary field.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2026-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Minerva},\n\tauthor = {Billi, Marco and Blanco, Gustavo and Urquiza, Anahí},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tkeywords = {Chile, Climate change, Literature meta-analysis, Scientific black boxes, Scientific representations, Social dimensions},\n\tpages = {293--315},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Over the last few decades climate change has been gaining importance in international scientific and political debates. However, the social sciences, especially in Latin America, have only lately become interested in the subject and their approach is still vague. Scientific understanding of global environmental change and the process of designing public policies to face them are characterized by their complexity as well as by epistemic and normative uncertainties. This makes it necessary to problematize the way in which research efforts understand ‘the social’ of climate change. How do ‘the climate’ and ‘the social’ interpenetrate as scientific objects? What does the resulting field look like? Is the combination capable of promoting reflexivity and collaboration on the issue, or does it merely become dispersed with diffuse boundaries? Our paper seeks to answer these and other related questions using Chile as a case study and examining peer-reviewed scientific research on the topic. By combining in-depth qualitative content analysis of each paper with a statistical meta-analysis, we were able to: characterize the key content and forms of such literature; identify divisions and patterns within it; and, discuss some factors and trends that may help explain these. We conclude that the literature displays two competing trends: while it is inclined to become fragmented beyond the scope of the ‘mitigation’ black box, it also tends to cluster along the lines of methodological distinctions traditionally contested within the social sciences. This, in turn, highlights the persistence of disciplinary divisions within an allegedly interdisciplinary field.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Machine Autonomy: Definition, Approaches, Challenges and Research Gaps.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ezenkwu, C. P.; and Starkey, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Arai, K.; Bhatia, R.; and Kapoor, S., editor(s), Intelligent Computing, pages 335–358, Cham, 2019. Springer International Publishing\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{ezenkwu_machine_2019,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\ttitle = {Machine {Autonomy}: {Definition}, {Approaches}, {Challenges} and {Research} {Gaps}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-030-22871-2},\n\tshorttitle = {Machine {Autonomy}},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-030-22871-2_24},\n\tabstract = {The processes that constitute the designs and implementations of AI systems such as self-driving cars, factory robots and so on have been mostly hand-engineered in the sense that the designers aim at giving the robots adequate knowledge of its world. This approach is not always efficient especially when the agent’s environment is unknown or too complex to be represented algorithmically. A truly autonomous agent can develop skills to enable it to succeed in such environments without giving it the ontological knowledge of the environment a priori. This paper seeks to review different notions of machine autonomy and presents a definition of autonomy and its attributes. The attributes of autonomy as presented in this paper are categorised into low-level and high-level attributes. The low-level attributes are the basic attributes that serve as the separating line between autonomous and other automated systems while the high-level attributes can serve as a taxonomic framework for ranking the degrees of autonomy of any system that has passed the low-level autonomy. The paper reviews some AI techniques as well as popular AI projects that focus on autonomous agent designs in order to identify the challenges of achieving a true autonomous system and suggest possible research directions.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tbooktitle = {Intelligent {Computing}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n\tauthor = {Ezenkwu, Chinedu Pascal and Starkey, Andrew},\n\teditor = {Arai, Kohei and Bhatia, Rahul and Kapoor, Supriya},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tkeywords = {Artificial intelligence, Automation, Autonomous agent, Learning, Machine autonomy, Robots},\n\tpages = {335--358},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The processes that constitute the designs and implementations of AI systems such as self-driving cars, factory robots and so on have been mostly hand-engineered in the sense that the designers aim at giving the robots adequate knowledge of its world. This approach is not always efficient especially when the agent’s environment is unknown or too complex to be represented algorithmically. A truly autonomous agent can develop skills to enable it to succeed in such environments without giving it the ontological knowledge of the environment a priori. This paper seeks to review different notions of machine autonomy and presents a definition of autonomy and its attributes. The attributes of autonomy as presented in this paper are categorised into low-level and high-level attributes. The low-level attributes are the basic attributes that serve as the separating line between autonomous and other automated systems while the high-level attributes can serve as a taxonomic framework for ranking the degrees of autonomy of any system that has passed the low-level autonomy. The paper reviews some AI techniques as well as popular AI projects that focus on autonomous agent designs in order to identify the challenges of achieving a true autonomous system and suggest possible research directions.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Wiener, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The MIT Press, October 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"CyberneticsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{wiener_cybernetics_2019,\n\ttitle = {Cybernetics or {Control} and {Communication} in the {Animal} and the {Machine}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-262-35590-2},\n\turl = {https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/4581/Cybernetics-or-Control-and-Communication-in-the},\n\tdoi = {10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001},\n\tabstract = {A classic and influential work that laid the theoretical foundations for information theory and a timely text for contemporary informations theorists and p},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tpublisher = {The MIT Press},\n\tauthor = {Wiener, Norbert},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2019},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n A classic and influential work that laid the theoretical foundations for information theory and a timely text for contemporary informations theorists and p\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2018\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Digital Personhood? The Status of Autonomous Software Agents in Private Law.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Teubner, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n May 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DigitalPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{teubner_digital_2018,\n\taddress = {Rochester, NY},\n\ttype = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},\n\ttitle = {Digital {Personhood}? {The} {Status} of {Autonomous} {Software} {Agents} in {Private} {Law}},\n\tshorttitle = {Digital {Personhood}?},\n\turl = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3177096},\n\tdoi = {10.2139/ssrn.3177096},\n\tabstract = {Already today in the economy and in society, autonomous software agents, i.e. mathematically formalized information flows, are attributed social identity and ability to act under certain conditions. Due to social action attribution, they have become non-human members of society. They pose three new liability risks: (1) the autonomy risk, which has its origin in stand-alone “decisions” taken by the software agents, (2) the association risk, which is due to the close cooperation between people and software agents, and (3) the network risk that occurs when computer systems operate in close integration with other computer systems. These risks pose a challenge for private law: to define a new legal status for autonomous digital information systems—however not simply as complete legal personhood of software agents, human-computer associations or multi-agent systems respectively. Rather, in response to each of the three risks, a legal status should be granted to each of the algorithmic types that is carefully calibrated to their specific role.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2024-11-18},\n\tpublisher = {Social Science Research Network},\n\tauthor = {Teubner, Gunther},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tkeywords = {actant, digital personhood, hybrid, juridical person, legal person, liability, personification, software agents},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Already today in the economy and in society, autonomous software agents, i.e. mathematically formalized information flows, are attributed social identity and ability to act under certain conditions. Due to social action attribution, they have become non-human members of society. They pose three new liability risks: (1) the autonomy risk, which has its origin in stand-alone “decisions” taken by the software agents, (2) the association risk, which is due to the close cooperation between people and software agents, and (3) the network risk that occurs when computer systems operate in close integration with other computer systems. These risks pose a challenge for private law: to define a new legal status for autonomous digital information systems—however not simply as complete legal personhood of software agents, human-computer associations or multi-agent systems respectively. Rather, in response to each of the three risks, a legal status should be granted to each of the algorithmic types that is carefully calibrated to their specific role.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The artificial intelligence black box and the failure on intent and causation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bthaee, Y.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2): 890–938. 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bthaee_artificial_2018,\n\ttitle = {The artificial intelligence black box and the failure on intent and causation},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {0897-3393},\n\turl = {https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v31/The-Artificial-Intelligence-Black-Box-and-the-Failure-of-Intent-and-Causation-Yavar-Bathaee.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Harvard Journal of Law \\& Technology},\n\tauthor = {Bthaee, Yavar},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {890--938},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Adaptive Learning of Local Semantic and Global Structure Representations for Text Classification.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zhao, J.; Zhan, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L.; and He, Z.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bender, E. M.; Derczynski, L.; and Isabelle, P., editor(s), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 2033–2043, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"AdaptivePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{zhao_adaptive_2018,\n\taddress = {Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA},\n\ttitle = {Adaptive {Learning} of {Local} {Semantic} and {Global} {Structure} {Representations} for {Text} {Classification}},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/C18-1173/},\n\tabstract = {Representation learning is a key issue for most Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Most existing representation models either learn little structure information or just rely on pre-defined structures, leading to degradation of performance and generalization capability. This paper focuses on learning both local semantic and global structure representations for text classification. In detail, we propose a novel Sandwich Neural Network (SNN) to learn semantic and structure representations automatically without relying on parsers. More importantly, semantic and structure information contribute unequally to the text representation at corpus and instance level. To solve the fusion problem, we propose two strategies: Adaptive Learning Sandwich Neural Network (AL-SNN) and Self-Attention Sandwich Neural Network (SA-SNN). The former learns the weights at corpus level, and the latter further combines attention mechanism to assign the weights at instance level. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves competitive performance on several text classification tasks, including sentiment analysis, question type classification and subjectivity classification. Specifically, the accuracies are MR (82.1\\%), SST-5 (50.4\\%), TREC (96\\%) and SUBJ (93.9\\%).},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th {International} {Conference} on {Computational} {Linguistics}},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\tauthor = {Zhao, Jianyu and Zhan, Zhiqiang and Yang, Qichuan and Zhang, Yang and Hu, Changjian and Li, Zhensheng and Zhang, Liuxin and He, Zhiqiang},\n\teditor = {Bender, Emily M. and Derczynski, Leon and Isabelle, Pierre},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {2033--2043},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Representation learning is a key issue for most Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Most existing representation models either learn little structure information or just rely on pre-defined structures, leading to degradation of performance and generalization capability. This paper focuses on learning both local semantic and global structure representations for text classification. In detail, we propose a novel Sandwich Neural Network (SNN) to learn semantic and structure representations automatically without relying on parsers. More importantly, semantic and structure information contribute unequally to the text representation at corpus and instance level. To solve the fusion problem, we propose two strategies: Adaptive Learning Sandwich Neural Network (AL-SNN) and Self-Attention Sandwich Neural Network (SA-SNN). The former learns the weights at corpus level, and the latter further combines attention mechanism to assign the weights at instance level. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves competitive performance on several text classification tasks, including sentiment analysis, question type classification and subjectivity classification. Specifically, the accuracies are MR (82.1%), SST-5 (50.4%), TREC (96%) and SUBJ (93.9%).\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Context-Aware Saliency Map Generation Using Semantic Segmentation.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ahmadi, M.; Hajabdollahi, M.; Karimi, N.; and Samavi, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Iranian Conference on, pages 616–620, Mashhad, May 2018. IEEE\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Context-AwarePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{ahmadi_context-aware_2018,\n\taddress = {Mashhad},\n\ttitle = {Context-{Aware} {Saliency} {Map} {Generation} {Using} {Semantic} {Segmentation}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-5386-4914-5 978-1-5386-4916-9},\n\turl = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8472577/},\n\tdoi = {10.1109/ICEE.2018.8472577},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tbooktitle = {Electrical {Engineering} ({ICEE}), {Iranian} {Conference} on},\n\tpublisher = {IEEE},\n\tauthor = {Ahmadi, Mahdi and Hajabdollahi, Mohsen and Karimi, Nader and Samavi, Shadrokh},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpages = {616--620},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2017\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Drive Teoria Sistêmica: Textos.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nunes, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"DrivePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{nunesDriveTeoriaSistemica2017,\n\taddress = {Google Drive},\n\ttype = {Drive},\n\ttitle = {Drive {Teoria} {Sistêmica}: {Textos}},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B6ajS9ka_eIkS1cwclVCdmhfcTQ?resourcekey=0-DHSl25phu06icdGhpIZrKw},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\turldate = {2024-12-09},\n\tauthor = {Nunes, Matheus},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Teorías sistémicas de la comunicación.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Baecker, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n MAD, (37): 1–20. September 2017.\n Number: 37\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"TeoríasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{baecker_teorias_2017,\n\ttitle = {Teorías sistémicas de la comunicación},\n\tcopyright = {Derechos de autor},\n\tissn = {0718-0527},\n\turl = {https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/47267},\n\tabstract = {Systemic theories of communication proceed from a deconstruction of Shannon's and Weaver's mathematical theory and transmission model of communication. Referring to the unresolved question of the identity of a message for different observers they instead develop a selection model of communication. In order to overcome the engineering model of signaling (rather than communication) offered by Shannon and Weaver systemic theories drop the assumption of a given set of possible messages any one message is considered to be selected from, and instead assume that the set of possible messages is to be constructed by the participants in communication as much as the single message then to be selected from that constructed set, also known as the context.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {37},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {MAD},\n\tauthor = {Baecker, Dirk},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Number: 37},\n\tkeywords = {Teoría sistémica},\n\tpages = {1--20},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Systemic theories of communication proceed from a deconstruction of Shannon's and Weaver's mathematical theory and transmission model of communication. Referring to the unresolved question of the identity of a message for different observers they instead develop a selection model of communication. In order to overcome the engineering model of signaling (rather than communication) offered by Shannon and Weaver systemic theories drop the assumption of a given set of possible messages any one message is considered to be selected from, and instead assume that the set of possible messages is to be constructed by the participants in communication as much as the single message then to be selected from that constructed set, also known as the context.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Algorithms.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Esposito, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(4): 249–265. August 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ArtificialPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{esposito_artificial_2017,\n\ttitle = {Artificial {Communication}? {The} {Production} of {Contingency} by {Algorithms}},\n\tvolume = {46},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tissn = {2366-0325},\n\tshorttitle = {Artificial {Communication}?},\n\turl = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014/html},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014},\n\tabstract = {Discourse about smart algorithms and digital social agents still refers primarily to the construction of artificial intelligence that reproduces the faculties of individuals. Recent developments, however, show that algorithms are more efficient when they abandon this goal and try instead to reproduce the ability to communicate. Algorithms that do not “think” like people can affect the ability to obtain and process information in society. Referring to the concept of communication in Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, this paper critically reconstructs the debate on the computational turn of big data as the artificial reproduction not of intelligence but of communication. Self-learning algorithms parasitically take advantage – be it consciously or unaware – of the contribution of web users to a “virtual double contingency.” This provides society with information that is not part of the thoughts of anyone, but, nevertheless, enters the communication circuit and raises its complexity. The concept of communication should be reconsidered to take account of these developments, including (or not) the possibility of communicating with algorithms.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Zeitschrift für Soziologie},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},\n\tauthor = {Esposito, Elena},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Deep Learning, Double Contingency, Neural Networks, Social Algorithms, Systems Theory},\n\tpages = {249--265},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Discourse about smart algorithms and digital social agents still refers primarily to the construction of artificial intelligence that reproduces the faculties of individuals. Recent developments, however, show that algorithms are more efficient when they abandon this goal and try instead to reproduce the ability to communicate. Algorithms that do not “think” like people can affect the ability to obtain and process information in society. Referring to the concept of communication in Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, this paper critically reconstructs the debate on the computational turn of big data as the artificial reproduction not of intelligence but of communication. Self-learning algorithms parasitically take advantage – be it consciously or unaware – of the contribution of web users to a “virtual double contingency.” This provides society with information that is not part of the thoughts of anyone, but, nevertheless, enters the communication circuit and raises its complexity. The concept of communication should be reconsidered to take account of these developments, including (or not) the possibility of communicating with algorithms.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2016\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Life as poly-contexturality.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gotthard, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n Tomado de Fahrenbach, H., & Schulz, W. (1973). Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: G. Neske.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LifePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{gotthard_life_2016,\n\ttype = {Webserver of the {Institute} for {Cybernetics} \\& {Systems} {Theory}},\n\ttitle = {Life as poly-contexturality},\n\turl = {http://www.vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/gg_life_as_polycontexturality.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {VorDenker},\n\tauthor = {Gotthard, Günther},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {Tomado de Fahrenbach, H., \\& Schulz, W. (1973). Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: G. Neske.},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n O Universo Quâtico: Tudo que pode acontecer realmente acontece.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cox, B.; and Forshaw, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Editora Fundamento Educacional LTDA, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{cox_o_2016,\n\ttitle = {O {Universo} {Quâtico}: {Tudo} que pode acontecer realmente acontece},\n\tisbn = {978-85-395-0662-0},\n\turl = {https://archive.org/details/OUniversoQuaticoBrianCoxJeffForshaw/page/n3/mode/2up},\n\tlanguage = {pt-BR},\n\tpublisher = {Editora Fundamento Educacional LTDA},\n\tauthor = {Cox, Brian and Forshaw, Jeff},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2015\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Una teoría sociológica de la comunicacion: la autoorganizacion de la sociedad basada en el conocimiento.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leydesdorff, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Teoría socialUniversidad Iberoamericana, México, D.F, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{leydesdorff_teorisociologica_2015,\n\taddress = {México, D.F},\n\tseries = {Teoría social},\n\ttitle = {Una teoría sociológica de la comunicacion: la autoorganizacion de la sociedad basada en el conocimiento},\n\tisbn = {978-607-417-343-7},\n\tshorttitle = {Una teoría sociológica de la comunicacion},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Leydesdorff, Loet},\n\ttranslator = {Vélez Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Simondon, a cibernética e a mecanologia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Domingues, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Scientiae Studia, 13(2): 283–306. June 2015.\n Number: 2\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Simondon,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{domingues_simondon_2015,\n\ttitle = {Simondon, a cibernética e a mecanologia},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2015 Scientiae Studia},\n\tissn = {2316-8994},\n\turl = {https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/103330},\n\tdoi = {10.1590/S1678-31662015000200003},\n\tabstract = {ResumoEste artigo propõe elucidar a relação entre a cibernética e a mecanologia na obra de Simondon, considerando suas duas teses de doutorado e a entrevista concedida em 1968 a Jean Le Moyne, a pedido do Ofício do Filme do Québec, no Canadá, ao longo da qual é predominante o uso de "mecanologia", em contraste com as teses, onde sofre a concorrência dos vocábulos "alagmática" e "organologia", ficando o termo "cibernética" na penumbra. A cibernética é celebrada na França em 1962, no contexto dos famosos Colóquios de Royaumont, quando Norbert Wiener foi homenageado e a cibernética ocupou toda a cena, com a participação ativa de Simondon na organização do evento. Essa situação leva os estudiosos a interrogar-se pelo destino do termo "cibernética" em sua obra, caso estivesse em jogo a segunda cibernética, em vez da primeira, e que só veio a lume mais tarde. Mais do que o interesse historiográfico do assunto, o artigo pretende suscitar um interesse epistemológico na filosofia da tecnologia. O desafio é lançar luz sobre a questão ainda por demais obscura acerca das relações entre a tecnologia, a engenharia e a ciência.},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Scientiae Studia},\n\tauthor = {Domingues, Ivan},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Number: 2},\n\tpages = {283--306},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n ResumoEste artigo propõe elucidar a relação entre a cibernética e a mecanologia na obra de Simondon, considerando suas duas teses de doutorado e a entrevista concedida em 1968 a Jean Le Moyne, a pedido do Ofício do Filme do Québec, no Canadá, ao longo da qual é predominante o uso de \"mecanologia\", em contraste com as teses, onde sofre a concorrência dos vocábulos \"alagmática\" e \"organologia\", ficando o termo \"cibernética\" na penumbra. A cibernética é celebrada na França em 1962, no contexto dos famosos Colóquios de Royaumont, quando Norbert Wiener foi homenageado e a cibernética ocupou toda a cena, com a participação ativa de Simondon na organização do evento. Essa situação leva os estudiosos a interrogar-se pelo destino do termo \"cibernética\" em sua obra, caso estivesse em jogo a segunda cibernética, em vez da primeira, e que só veio a lume mais tarde. Mais do que o interesse historiográfico do assunto, o artigo pretende suscitar um interesse epistemológico na filosofia da tecnologia. O desafio é lançar luz sobre a questão ainda por demais obscura acerca das relações entre a tecnologia, a engenharia e a ciência.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2014\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kitchin, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Big Data & Society, 1(1): 2053951714528481. April 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"BigPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kitchin_big_2014,\n\ttitle = {Big {Data}, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tissn = {2053-9517},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/2053951714528481},\n\tabstract = {This article examines how the availability of Big Data, coupled with new data analytics, challenges established epistemologies across the sciences, social sciences and humanities, and assesses the extent to which they are engendering paradigm shifts across multiple disciplines. In particular, it critically explores new forms of empiricism that declare ‘the end of theory’, the creation of data-driven rather than knowledge-driven science, and the development of digital humanities and computational social sciences that propose radically different ways to make sense of culture, history, economy and society. It is argued that: (1) Big Data and new data analytics are disruptive innovations which are reconfiguring in many instances how research is conducted; and (2) there is an urgent need for wider critical reflection within the academy on the epistemological implications of the unfolding data revolution, a task that has barely begun to be tackled despite the rapid changes in research practices presently taking place. After critically reviewing emerging epistemological positions, it is contended that a potentially fruitful approach would be the development of a situated, reflexive and contextually nuanced epistemology.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tjournal = {Big Data \\& Society},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications Ltd},\n\tauthor = {Kitchin, Rob},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tpages = {2053951714528481},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This article examines how the availability of Big Data, coupled with new data analytics, challenges established epistemologies across the sciences, social sciences and humanities, and assesses the extent to which they are engendering paradigm shifts across multiple disciplines. In particular, it critically explores new forms of empiricism that declare ‘the end of theory’, the creation of data-driven rather than knowledge-driven science, and the development of digital humanities and computational social sciences that propose radically different ways to make sense of culture, history, economy and society. It is argued that: (1) Big Data and new data analytics are disruptive innovations which are reconfiguring in many instances how research is conducted; and (2) there is an urgent need for wider critical reflection within the academy on the epistemological implications of the unfolding data revolution, a task that has barely begun to be tackled despite the rapid changes in research practices presently taking place. After critically reviewing emerging epistemological positions, it is contended that a potentially fruitful approach would be the development of a situated, reflexive and contextually nuanced epistemology.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Laws of Form - An Exploration in Mathematics and Foundations.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kauffman, L. H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Rough Draft, 2014.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LawsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{kauffman_laws_2014,\n\ttitle = {Laws of {Form} - {An} {Exploration} in {Mathematics} and {Foundations}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-5010-7576-6},\n\turl = {http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/Laws.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tpublisher = {Rough Draft},\n\tauthor = {Kauffman, Louis H.},\n\tyear = {2014},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2013\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Inteligência artificial.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Russell, S.; and Norvig, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Elsevier, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"InteligênciaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{russell_inteligencia_2013,\n\ttitle = {Inteligência artificial},\n\tisbn = {978-85-352-3701-6},\n\turl = {https://www.kufunda.net/publicdocs/Intelig%C3%AAncia%20Artificial%20(Peter%20Norvig,%20Stuart%20Russell).pdf},\n\tlanguage = {pt-BR},\n\tpublisher = {Elsevier},\n\tauthor = {Russell, Stuart and Norvig, Peter},\n\ttranslator = {Simille de Macedo, Regina Célia},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Administração e serviços auxiliares},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Die Realität der Massenmedien.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Springer-Verlag, April 2013.\n Google-Books-ID: KYWtBgAAQBAJ\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_realitat_2013,\n\ttitle = {Die {Realität} der {Massenmedien}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-663-01103-3},\n\tabstract = {Was wir von der Gesellschaft und ihrer Welt wissen, wissen wir fast ausschließlich durch die Massenmedien. Gleichzeitig haben wir jedoch den Verdacht, daß dieses Wissen manipuliert wird. Zumindest kommt es extrem selektiv zustande, gesteuert zum Beispiel durch wenige Faktoren, die den Nachrichtenwert von Informationen bestimmen oder Unterhaltungssendungen attraktiv erscheinen lassen. Aber dies Gegenwissen wirkt sich nicht aus. Die Realität ist so hinzunehmen, wie sie von den Massenmedien präsentiert und rekursiv, auf sich selbst aufbauend, reproduziert wird. Der aus einem Vortrag in der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften hervorgegangene Text versucht, diesen Widerspruch zu klären und ihn in einer allgemeinen Theorie operativ geschlossener Sozialsysteme aufzuheben.},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\tpublisher = {Springer-Verlag},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {Google-Books-ID: KYWtBgAAQBAJ},\n\tkeywords = {Social Science / Media Studies, Social Science / Sociology / General},\n}\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Was wir von der Gesellschaft und ihrer Welt wissen, wissen wir fast ausschließlich durch die Massenmedien. Gleichzeitig haben wir jedoch den Verdacht, daß dieses Wissen manipuliert wird. Zumindest kommt es extrem selektiv zustande, gesteuert zum Beispiel durch wenige Faktoren, die den Nachrichtenwert von Informationen bestimmen oder Unterhaltungssendungen attraktiv erscheinen lassen. Aber dies Gegenwissen wirkt sich nicht aus. Die Realität ist so hinzunehmen, wie sie von den Massenmedien präsentiert und rekursiv, auf sich selbst aufbauend, reproduziert wird. Der aus einem Vortrag in der Nordrhein-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften hervorgegangene Text versucht, diesen Widerspruch zu klären und ihn in einer allgemeinen Theorie operativ geschlossener Sozialsysteme aufzuheben.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2012\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las redes de sentido como modelo para la observación de la ciencia: Luhmann desde un punto de vista estructural.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vélez Cuartas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Estrada Saavedra, M.; and Millán, R., editor(s), La teoría de los sistemas de Niklas Luhmann a prueba: horizontes de aplicación en la investigación social en América Latina, pages 219–274. El Colegio de México : Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, México, D.F, Primera edición edition, 2012.\n OCLC: ocn828869094\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{velez_cuartas_redes_2012,\n\taddress = {México, D.F},\n\tedition = {Primera edición},\n\ttitle = {Las redes de sentido como modelo para la observación de la ciencia: {Luhmann} desde un punto de vista estructural},\n\tisbn = {978-607-462-375-8},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15hvvgw.8},\n\tbooktitle = {La teoría de los sistemas de {Niklas} {Luhmann} a prueba: horizontes de aplicación en la investigación social en {América} {Latina}},\n\tpublisher = {El Colegio de México : Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Vélez Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\teditor = {Estrada Saavedra, Marco and Millán, René},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tnote = {OCLC: ocn828869094},\n\tkeywords = {Latin America, Luhmann, Niklas, Social conditions},\n\tpages = {219--274},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Rewriting Theory: From Autopoiesis to Communication.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vanderstraeten, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(4): 377–386. 2012.\n _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sres.2116\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"RewritingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{vanderstraeten_rewriting_2012,\n\ttitle = {Rewriting {Theory}: {From} {Autopoiesis} to {Communication}},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright © 2012 John Wiley \\& Sons, Ltd.},\n\tissn = {1099-1743},\n\tshorttitle = {Rewriting {Theory}},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sres.2116},\n\tdoi = {10.1002/sres.2116},\n\tabstract = {This paper analyzes the causes and motives for the transition to a communication-based theory of social systems in the late work of Niklas Luhmann. In the first part of this paper, I present a brief sketch of advances in the field of cybernetics and systems research. I give special attention to some basic concepts introduced by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela: autopoiesis, organizational closure and enaction. In the second part, I discuss how these ideas may contribute to a ‘conceptual revolution’ in the social and behavioral sciences. In the late work of Niklas Luhmann, attempts to incorporate the idea of autopoiesis in his own social theory resulted in the preference for a communication-based, instead of an action-based, theory of social systems. Moreover, given the current transition to the information age or the knowledge society, it can also be argued that structural changes in society nowadays favor the rise of a communication-based theory of social systems. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley \\& Sons, Ltd.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Systems Research and Behavioral Science},\n\tauthor = {Vanderstraeten, Raf},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tnote = {\\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sres.2116},\n\tkeywords = {Francisco Varela, Humberto Maturana, Niklas Luhmann, autopoiesis, communication, enaction},\n\tpages = {377--386},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper analyzes the causes and motives for the transition to a communication-based theory of social systems in the late work of Niklas Luhmann. In the first part of this paper, I present a brief sketch of advances in the field of cybernetics and systems research. I give special attention to some basic concepts introduced by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela: autopoiesis, organizational closure and enaction. In the second part, I discuss how these ideas may contribute to a ‘conceptual revolution’ in the social and behavioral sciences. In the late work of Niklas Luhmann, attempts to incorporate the idea of autopoiesis in his own social theory resulted in the preference for a communication-based, instead of an action-based, theory of social systems. Moreover, given the current transition to the information age or the knowledge society, it can also be argued that structural changes in society nowadays favor the rise of a communication-based theory of social systems. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n A Vontade Superinteligente. Motivação e Racionalidade Instrumental em Agentes Artificiais Avançados.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bostrom, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"APaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{bostrom_vontade_2012,\n\ttitle = {A {Vontade} {Superinteligente}. {Motivação} e {Racionalidade} {Instrumental} em {Agentes} {Artificiais} {Avançados}},\n\turl = {https://ierfh.org/a-vontade-superinteligente/},\n\tlanguage = {pt-BR},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {IERFH},\n\tauthor = {Bostrom, Nick},\n\tyear = {2012},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Superintelligent Will: Motivation and Instrumental Rationality in Advanced Artificial Agents.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bostrom, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Minds and Machines, 22(2): 71–85. May 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{bostrom_superintelligent_2012,\n\ttitle = {The {Superintelligent} {Will}: {Motivation} and {Instrumental} {Rationality} in {Advanced} {Artificial} {Agents}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1572-8641},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Superintelligent} {Will}},\n\turl = {https://nickbostrom.com/superintelligentwill.pdf},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11023-012-9281-3},\n\tabstract = {This paper discusses the relation between intelligence and motivation in artificial agents, developing and briefly arguing for two theses. The first, the orthogonality thesis, holds (with some caveats) that intelligence and final goals (purposes) are orthogonal axes along which possible artificial intellects can freely vary—more or less any level of intelligence could be combined with more or less any final goal. The second, the instrumental convergence thesis, holds that as long as they possess a sufficient level of intelligence, agents having any of a wide range of final goals will pursue similar intermediary goals because they have instrumental reasons to do so. In combination, the two theses help us understand the possible range of behavior of superintelligent agents, and they point to some potential dangers in building such an agent.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Minds and Machines},\n\tauthor = {Bostrom, Nick},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {AI, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial intelligence, Goal, Instrumental reason, Intelligent agent, Superintelligence},\n\tpages = {71--85},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This paper discusses the relation between intelligence and motivation in artificial agents, developing and briefly arguing for two theses. The first, the orthogonality thesis, holds (with some caveats) that intelligence and final goals (purposes) are orthogonal axes along which possible artificial intellects can freely vary—more or less any level of intelligence could be combined with more or less any final goal. The second, the instrumental convergence thesis, holds that as long as they possess a sufficient level of intelligence, agents having any of a wide range of final goals will pursue similar intermediary goals because they have instrumental reasons to do so. In combination, the two theses help us understand the possible range of behavior of superintelligent agents, and they point to some potential dangers in building such an agent.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Thinking Inside the Box: Controlling and Using an Oracle AI.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Armstrong, S.; Sandberg, A.; and Bostrom, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Minds and Machines, 22(4): 299–324. November 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThinkingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{armstrong_thinking_2012,\n\ttitle = {Thinking {Inside} the {Box}: {Controlling} and {Using} an {Oracle} {AI}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {1572-8641},\n\tshorttitle = {Thinking {Inside} the {Box}},\n\turl = {https://nickbostrom.com/papers/oracle.pdf},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11023-012-9282-2},\n\tabstract = {There is no strong reason to believe that human-level intelligence represents an upper limit of the capacity of artificial intelligence, should it be realized. This poses serious safety issues, since a superintelligent system would have great power to direct the future according to its possibly flawed motivation system. Solving this issue in general has proven to be considerably harder than expected. This paper looks at one particular approach, Oracle AI. An Oracle AI is an AI that does not act in the world except by answering questions. Even this narrow approach presents considerable challenges. In this paper, we analyse and critique various methods of controlling the AI. In general an Oracle AI might be safer than unrestricted AI, but still remains potentially dangerous.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Minds and Machines},\n\tauthor = {Armstrong, Stuart and Sandberg, Anders and Bostrom, Nick},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {Artificial Intelligence, Artificial intelligence, Capability control, Motivational control, Risks, Security, Superintelligence},\n\tpages = {299--324},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n There is no strong reason to believe that human-level intelligence represents an upper limit of the capacity of artificial intelligence, should it be realized. This poses serious safety issues, since a superintelligent system would have great power to direct the future according to its possibly flawed motivation system. Solving this issue in general has proven to be considerably harder than expected. This paper looks at one particular approach, Oracle AI. An Oracle AI is an AI that does not act in the world except by answering questions. Even this narrow approach presents considerable challenges. In this paper, we analyse and critique various methods of controlling the AI. In general an Oracle AI might be safer than unrestricted AI, but still remains potentially dangerous.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2011\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Formas de la comunicación y redes de sentido.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vélez Cuartas, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Galindo Cáceres, L. J., editor(s), Comunicología posible. Hacia una ciencia de la comunicación, pages 199–261. Universidad Intercontinental, A.C., México, 1 edition, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"FormasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{velez_cuartas_formas_2011,\n\taddress = {México},\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {Formas de la comunicación y redes de sentido},\n\tisbn = {978-607-9152-02-4},\n\turl = {https://portal.ucol.mx/culturascontemporaneas/libros/LibroComunicologiaPosible.pdf#page=263.41},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Comunicología posible. {Hacia} una ciencia de la comunicación},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Intercontinental, A.C.},\n\tauthor = {Vélez Cuartas, Gabriel},\n\teditor = {Galindo Cáceres, Luis Jesús},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tpages = {199--261},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The quantum universe: everything that can happen does happen.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Cox, B. E.; and Forshaw, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Allen Lane, London, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{cox_quantum_2011,\n\taddress = {London},\n\ttitle = {The quantum universe: everything that can happen does happen},\n\tisbn = {978-1-84614-432-5},\n\tshorttitle = {The quantum universe},\n\turl = {https://archive.org/details/quantumuniversee0000coxb},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Allen Lane},\n\tauthor = {Cox, Brian E. and Forshaw, Jeff},\n\tyear = {2011},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2009\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Self-Referential Technology and the Growth of Information: From Techniques to Technology to the Technology of Technology.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Marton, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Soziale Systeme, 15(1): 138–159. May 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Self-ReferentialPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{marton_self-referential_2009,\n\ttitle = {Self-{Referential} {Technology} and the {Growth} of {Information}: {From} {Techniques} to {Technology} to the {Technology} of {Technology}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tcopyright = {De Gruyter expressly reserves the right to use all content for commercial text and data mining within the meaning of Section 44b of the German Copyright Act.},\n\tissn = {2366-0473},\n\tshorttitle = {Self-{Referential} {Technology} and the {Growth} of {Information}},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHEErS-Przt0vkJONUtzewe_gBbeww68/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tdoi = {10.1515/sosys-2009-0109},\n\tabstract = {Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel ist ein Versuch, Technologie selbst als ein Gebiet soziologischer Forschung zu erarbeiten. Bis jetzt wurde Technologie zumeist als ein nicht-soziales Artefakt gehandhabt und nur ihr Einfluss auf die moderne Gesellschaft war für Sozialforscher von Interesse. Diese herkömmliche Sichtweise basiert auf der Cartesianischen Subjekt/Objekt Dichotomie in der Form Gesellschaft/Technologie. Gegenwärtige technologische Entwicklungen widerlegen jedoch diesen sozialwissenschaftlichen Zugang. Technologie ist am Sprung zur operationalen Schließung, zum re-entry und somit zur Selbstreferentialität. Eine systemtheoretische Herangehensweise an Technologie als funktionierende Simplifizierung und Containment, könnte sich als viabler Ausgangspunkt herausstellen, um eine abstraktere und akkuratere Konzeptualisierung von Technologie zu erreichen. In den letzten Abschnitten wird die Arbeit von Kallinikos über »information growth« vorgestellt, die Technologie als ein systemisches und paradoxes Konzept zu beobachten versucht. Schlussendlich schlägt der Artikel eine neue Herangehensweise an den Technologiebegriff vor, welcher auf folgenden drei Bausteinen beruht: 1) eine operationale und nicht artefaktbasierte Definition der Technologie, 2) die Ausdifferenzierung der Technologie als historische Entwicklung und 3) das re-entry der Technologie in der Form der Technologie zweiter Ordnung.},\n\tlanguage = {de},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tjournal = {Soziale Systeme},\n\tpublisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},\n\tauthor = {Marton, Attila},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tpages = {138--159},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Zusammenfassung Dieser Artikel ist ein Versuch, Technologie selbst als ein Gebiet soziologischer Forschung zu erarbeiten. Bis jetzt wurde Technologie zumeist als ein nicht-soziales Artefakt gehandhabt und nur ihr Einfluss auf die moderne Gesellschaft war für Sozialforscher von Interesse. Diese herkömmliche Sichtweise basiert auf der Cartesianischen Subjekt/Objekt Dichotomie in der Form Gesellschaft/Technologie. Gegenwärtige technologische Entwicklungen widerlegen jedoch diesen sozialwissenschaftlichen Zugang. Technologie ist am Sprung zur operationalen Schließung, zum re-entry und somit zur Selbstreferentialität. Eine systemtheoretische Herangehensweise an Technologie als funktionierende Simplifizierung und Containment, könnte sich als viabler Ausgangspunkt herausstellen, um eine abstraktere und akkuratere Konzeptualisierung von Technologie zu erreichen. In den letzten Abschnitten wird die Arbeit von Kallinikos über »information growth« vorgestellt, die Technologie als ein systemisches und paradoxes Konzept zu beobachten versucht. Schlussendlich schlägt der Artikel eine neue Herangehensweise an den Technologiebegriff vor, welcher auf folgenden drei Bausteinen beruht: 1) eine operationale und nicht artefaktbasierte Definition der Technologie, 2) die Ausdifferenzierung der Technologie als historische Entwicklung und 3) das re-entry der Technologie in der Form der Technologie zweiter Ordnung.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The non-linear dynamics of meaning processing in social systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leydesdorff, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Social Science Information, 48(1): 5–33. March 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{leydesdorff_non-linear_2009,\n\ttitle = {The non-linear dynamics of meaning processing in social systems},\n\tvolume = {48},\n\tissn = {0539-0184},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408099635},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0539018408099635},\n\tabstract = {Social order cannot be considered as a stable phenomenon because it contains an order of reproduced expectations. When the expectations operate upon one another, they generate a non-linear dynamics that processes meaning. Specific meaning can be stabilized, for example, in social institutions, but all meaning arises from a horizon of possible meanings. Using Luhmann's social systems theory and Rosen's theory of anticipatory systems, I submit equations for modeling the processing of meaning in inter-human communication. First, a self-referential system can use a model of itself for the anticipation. Under the condition of functional differentiation, the social system can be expected to entertain a set of models; each model can also contain a model of the other models. Two anticipatory mechanisms are then possible: one transversal between the models and a longitudinal one providing the modeled systems with meaning from the perspective of hindsight. A system containing two anticipatory mechanisms can become hyper-incursive. Without decision-making, however, a hyper-incursive system would be overloaded with uncertainty. Under this pressure, informed decisions tend to replace the `natural preferences' of agents, and an order of cultural expectations can increasingly be shaped.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Social Science Information},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications Ltd},\n\tauthor = {Leydesdorff, Loet},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tpages = {5--33},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Social order cannot be considered as a stable phenomenon because it contains an order of reproduced expectations. When the expectations operate upon one another, they generate a non-linear dynamics that processes meaning. Specific meaning can be stabilized, for example, in social institutions, but all meaning arises from a horizon of possible meanings. Using Luhmann's social systems theory and Rosen's theory of anticipatory systems, I submit equations for modeling the processing of meaning in inter-human communication. First, a self-referential system can use a model of itself for the anticipation. Under the condition of functional differentiation, the social system can be expected to entertain a set of models; each model can also contain a model of the other models. Two anticipatory mechanisms are then possible: one transversal between the models and a longitudinal one providing the modeled systems with meaning from the perspective of hindsight. A system containing two anticipatory mechanisms can become hyper-incursive. Without decision-making, however, a hyper-incursive system would be overloaded with uncertainty. Under this pressure, informed decisions tend to replace the `natural preferences' of agents, and an order of cultural expectations can increasingly be shaped.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2008\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las ciencias modernas y la fenomenología.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Jiménez, M. A., editor(s), Sociología y filosofía: pensar las ciencias sociales, pages 303–335. Casa Juan Pablos - FES-Acatán, UNAM, México, D.F, 1. ed edition, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@incollection{luhmann_niklas_ciencias_2008,\n\taddress = {México, D.F},\n\tedition = {1. ed},\n\ttitle = {Las ciencias modernas y la fenomenología},\n\tisbn = {978-607-7554-10-3},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6ajS9ka_eIkSWNVWFpsZVZzY0k/view?resourcekey=0-nis1N_elaF73KR3xy95kBw},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tbooktitle = {Sociología y filosofía: pensar las ciencias sociales},\n\tpublisher = {Casa Juan Pablos - FES-Acatán, UNAM},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\teditor = {Jiménez, Marco Antonio},\n\ttranslator = {Torres Nafarrate, Javier},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tpages = {303--335},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2007\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Savage, M.; and Burrows, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociology, 41(5): 885–899. October 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{savage_coming_2007,\n\ttitle = {The {Coming} {Crisis} of {Empirical} {Sociology}},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tissn = {0038-0385},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O7vAi_buWGsz4w6B3IyU1m8UdoibUM_i/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0038038507080443},\n\tabstract = {This ar ticle argues that in an age of knowing capitalism, sociologists have not adequately thought about the challenges posed to their expertise by the proliferation of `social' transactional data which are now routinely collected, processed and analysed by a wide variety of private and public institutions. Drawing on British examples, we argue that whereas over the past 40 years sociologists championed innovative methodological resources, notably the sample survey and the in-depth interviews, which reasonably allowed them to claim distinctive expertise to access the `social' in powerful ways, such claims are now much less secure. We argue that both the sample survey and the in-depth interview are increasingly dated research methods, which are unlikely to provide a robust base for the jurisdiction of empirical sociologists in coming decades. We conclude by speculating how sociology might respond to this coming crisis through taking up new interests in the `politics of method'.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2025-02-17},\n\tjournal = {Sociology},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications Ltd},\n\tauthor = {Savage, Mike and Burrows, Roger},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tpages = {885--899},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n This ar ticle argues that in an age of knowing capitalism, sociologists have not adequately thought about the challenges posed to their expertise by the proliferation of `social' transactional data which are now routinely collected, processed and analysed by a wide variety of private and public institutions. Drawing on British examples, we argue that whereas over the past 40 years sociologists championed innovative methodological resources, notably the sample survey and the in-depth interviews, which reasonably allowed them to claim distinctive expertise to access the `social' in powerful ways, such claims are now much less secure. We argue that both the sample survey and the in-depth interview are increasingly dated research methods, which are unlikely to provide a robust base for the jurisdiction of empirical sociologists in coming decades. We conclude by speculating how sociology might respond to this coming crisis through taking up new interests in the `politics of method'.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Communication with Computers, or How Next Society Calls for an Understanding of Temporal Form.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Baecker, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n January 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"CommunicationPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@misc{baecker_communication_2007,\n\taddress = {Rochester, NY},\n\ttype = {{SSRN} {Scholarly} {Paper}},\n\ttitle = {Communication with {Computers}, or {How} {Next} {Society} {Calls} for an {Understanding} of {Temporal} {Form}},\n\turl = {https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1867443},\n\tabstract = {Communication via electronic media of communication, Niklas Luhmann assumes in his book Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, is not only different from communication via other media of dissemination, most notably language, writing, and the printing press, but it is also forcing society to change both its structure and its culture by catastrophically presenting society with an overflow of meaning. This new overflow of meaning cannot be dealt with by the structure and culture forms of society, which proved able to deal with the overflows produced by language, writing, and the printing press. The computer, as Luhmann sees it, is separating the input of data into the computer from the retrieval of these data, thus separating utterance from understanding and enabling computations on these data opaque to any user. "Who is feeding the computer with data," Luhmann is writing, "does not know (and if he knew he did not need the computer) what will be retrieved out of it." There is an overflow of data with no hints as to which actions and intentions might lend it accountability. Mediated via the screen, presenting us with a new relation between surface and depth, known before only from religion (and art), communication becomes dependent from structural couplings with an "invisible machine," which add to those structural couplings traditional societies entertain with spirits, ghosts, and gods, and modern society entertains with human consciousness. The present paper is trying to emphasize Luhmann's original insight and to look at the two arguments this insight consists of. It leads to an account of the notion of temporal form, which may turn out to provide for the cultural form enabling next society to deal with the communication overflow produced by computers and their derivatives.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-02-11},\n\tpublisher = {Social Science Research Network},\n\tauthor = {Baecker, Dirk},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, computer, culture, society},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Communication via electronic media of communication, Niklas Luhmann assumes in his book Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, is not only different from communication via other media of dissemination, most notably language, writing, and the printing press, but it is also forcing society to change both its structure and its culture by catastrophically presenting society with an overflow of meaning. This new overflow of meaning cannot be dealt with by the structure and culture forms of society, which proved able to deal with the overflows produced by language, writing, and the printing press. The computer, as Luhmann sees it, is separating the input of data into the computer from the retrieval of these data, thus separating utterance from understanding and enabling computations on these data opaque to any user. \"Who is feeding the computer with data,\" Luhmann is writing, \"does not know (and if he knew he did not need the computer) what will be retrieved out of it.\" There is an overflow of data with no hints as to which actions and intentions might lend it accountability. Mediated via the screen, presenting us with a new relation between surface and depth, known before only from religion (and art), communication becomes dependent from structural couplings with an \"invisible machine,\" which add to those structural couplings traditional societies entertain with spirits, ghosts, and gods, and modern society entertains with human consciousness. The present paper is trying to emphasize Luhmann's original insight and to look at the two arguments this insight consists of. It leads to an account of the notion of temporal form, which may turn out to provide for the cultural form enabling next society to deal with the communication overflow produced by computers and their derivatives.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La sociedad de la sociedad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Herder - Universidad Iberoamericana, México D.F, 1 edition, 2007.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_sociedad_2007,\n\taddress = {México D.F},\n\tedition = {1},\n\ttitle = {La sociedad de la sociedad},\n\tisbn = {978-968-5807-20-3},\n\turl = {https://circulosemiotico.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/la-sociedad-de-la-sociedad-niklas-luhmann.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tpublisher = {Herder - Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\ttranslator = {Torres Nafarrate, Javier},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tkeywords = {Social Science / Sociology / General},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La realidad de los medios de masas.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universidad Iberoamericana, 2007.\n Google-Books-ID: qpgVO8xlKMQC\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_realidad_2007,\n\ttitle = {La realidad de los medios de masas},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7658-807-9},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tnote = {Google-Books-ID: qpgVO8xlKMQC},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2006\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Luhmann explained: from souls to systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Moeller, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Ideas explainedOpen Court, Chicago, 2006.\n OCLC: ocm68694011\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LuhmannPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{moeller_luhmann_2006,\n\taddress = {Chicago},\n\tseries = {Ideas explained},\n\ttitle = {Luhmann explained: from souls to systems},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8126-9598-4},\n\tshorttitle = {Luhmann explained},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o7wm-pN4EFeiE061ZkeZfOXPCiKs4sM6/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tabstract = {"An introduction to Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory. Discusses key concepts and relevant philosophical issues, and presents a case study. English-language translations of three of Luhmann's essays and bibliographies of works by and on Luhmann are included"--Provided by publisher},\n\tnumber = {v. 3},\n\tpublisher = {Open Court},\n\tauthor = {Moeller, Hans-Georg},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {OCLC: ocm68694011},\n\tkeywords = {Luhmann, Niklas, Mass media, Philosophy, Social aspects, Social systems},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n \"An introduction to Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory. Discusses key concepts and relevant philosophical issues, and presents a case study. English-language translations of three of Luhmann's essays and bibliographies of works by and on Luhmann are included\"–Provided by publisher\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2005\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Organización y decisión: autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Biblioteca A SociedadAnthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana, Rubí (Barcelona), 1. reimpresión edition, 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OrganizaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_organizacion_2005,\n\taddress = {Rubí (Barcelona)},\n\tedition = {1. reimpresión},\n\tseries = {Biblioteca {A} {Sociedad}},\n\ttitle = {Organización y decisión: autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7658-772-0},\n\tshorttitle = {Organización y decisión},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6ajS9ka_eIkNUJQVUhhLUtMVmM/view?resourcekey=0-SOnurcivWwicVPrXDTAiYA},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tnumber = {27},\n\tpublisher = {Anthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tyear = {2005},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Organizations as Decision Machines: Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Organized Social Systems.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Nassehi, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Sociological Review, 53(1_suppl): 178–191. October 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OrganizationsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{nassehi_organizations_2005,\n\ttitle = {Organizations as {Decision} {Machines}: {Niklas} {Luhmann}'s {Theory} of {Organized} {Social} {Systems}},\n\tvolume = {53},\n\tcopyright = {https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license},\n\tissn = {0038-0261, 1467-954X},\n\tshorttitle = {Organizations as {Decision} {Machines}},\n\turl = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00549.x},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00549.x},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1\\_suppl},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {The Sociological Review},\n\tauthor = {Nassehi, Armin},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tpages = {178--191},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2004\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Second‐order cybernetics: an historical introduction.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Scott, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Kybernetes, 33(9/10): 1365–1378. October 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Second‐orderPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{scott_secondorder_2004,\n\ttitle = {Second‐order cybernetics: an historical introduction},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\tcopyright = {https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies},\n\tissn = {0368-492X},\n\tshorttitle = {Second‐order cybernetics},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHEErS-Przt0vkJONUtzewe_gBbeww68/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/03684920410556007},\n\tabstract = {In 1974, Heinz von Foerster articulated the distinction between a first‐ and second‐order cybernetics, as, respectively, the cybernetics of observed systems and the cybernetics of observing systems. Von Foerster's distinction, together with his own work on the epistemology of the observer, has been enormously influential on the work of a later generation of cyberneticians. It has provided an architecture for the discipline of cybernetics, one that, in true cybernetic spirit, provides order where previously there was variety and disorder. It has provided a foundation for the research programme that is second‐order cybernetics. However, as von Foerster himself makes clear, the distinction he articulated was imminent right from the outset in the thinking of the early cyberneticians, before, even, the name of their discipline had been coined. In this paper, the author gives a brief account of the developments in cybernetics that lead to von Foerster's making his distinction. As is the way of such narratives, it is but one perspective on a complex series of events. Not only is this account a personal perspective, it also includes some recollections of events that were observed and participated in at first hand.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {9/10},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Kybernetes},\n\tauthor = {Scott, Bernard},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tpages = {1365--1378},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In 1974, Heinz von Foerster articulated the distinction between a first‐ and second‐order cybernetics, as, respectively, the cybernetics of observed systems and the cybernetics of observing systems. Von Foerster's distinction, together with his own work on the epistemology of the observer, has been enormously influential on the work of a later generation of cyberneticians. It has provided an architecture for the discipline of cybernetics, one that, in true cybernetic spirit, provides order where previously there was variety and disorder. It has provided a foundation for the research programme that is second‐order cybernetics. However, as von Foerster himself makes clear, the distinction he articulated was imminent right from the outset in the thinking of the early cyberneticians, before, even, the name of their discipline had been coined. In this paper, the author gives a brief account of the developments in cybernetics that lead to von Foerster's making his distinction. As is the way of such narratives, it is but one perspective on a complex series of events. Not only is this account a personal perspective, it also includes some recollections of events that were observed and participated in at first hand.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Inteligencia colectiva: por una antropología del ciberespacio.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Lévy, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Biblioteca Digital Juan ComasOrganización Panamericana de la Salud, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"InteligenciaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{levy_inteligencia_2004,\n\tseries = {Biblioteca {Digital} {Juan} {Comas}},\n\ttitle = {Inteligencia colectiva: por una antropología del ciberespacio},\n\turl = {http://bdjc.iia.unam.mx/files/original/a9d1c2a485b6726ce0ff338fbcd1bfa5.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Espanol},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tpublisher = {Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde},\n\tauthor = {Lévy, Pierre},\n\tyear = {2004},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2003\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Autopoiesis, la unidad de una diferencia: Luhmann y Maturana.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rodríguez M., D.; and Torres N., J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sociologias, (9): 106–140. January 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Autopoiesis,Paper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{rodriguezm.AutopoiesisUnidadDiferencia2003,\n\ttitle = {Autopoiesis, la unidad de una diferencia: {Luhmann} y {Maturana}},\n\tissn = {1517-4522},\n\tshorttitle = {Autopoiesis, la unidad de una diferencia},\n\turl = {http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-45222003000100005&lng=es&tlng=es},\n\tdoi = {10.1590/S1517-45222003000100005},\n\tabstract = {El artículo ofrece una reseña de la fructífera relación teórica entre Niklas Luhmann y Humberto Maturana. La teoría luhmanniana es un edificio conceptual cuyas dimensiones abarcan la comprensión de todo lo social. Pese al fallecimiento del autor en 1998, todavía hoy se continúan publicando escritos póstumos y la influencia de su pensamiento se extiende paulatinamente a diversos ámbitos de las ciencias sociales. Parte central de este complejo pensamiento se desarrolla con la ayuda de conceptos que Luhmann adaptó de la biología de Humberto Maturana. En este trabajo se explica el modo de esta vinculación y los alcances que tiene para la comprensión de la sociedad globalizada moderna.\n          , \n            The article presents a synopsis of the fruitful relationship between Niklas Luhmann and Humberto Maturana. The Luhmannian theory is a conceptual structure whose dimensions include the understanding of the social as a whole. Notwithstanding the passing of the author in 1998, his posthumous writings are still being published and the influence of his thinking is gradually extended to several domains within social sciences. A core part of that complex thinking was developed with the benefit of concepts that Luhmann adapted from Humberto Maturana's biology. This study explains the workings of such tie and its reach for understanding modern globalized society.},\n\tnumber = {9},\n\turldate = {2026-02-23},\n\tjournal = {Sociologias},\n\tauthor = {Rodríguez M., Darío and Torres N., Javier},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tpages = {106--140},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n El artículo ofrece una reseña de la fructífera relación teórica entre Niklas Luhmann y Humberto Maturana. La teoría luhmanniana es un edificio conceptual cuyas dimensiones abarcan la comprensión de todo lo social. Pese al fallecimiento del autor en 1998, todavía hoy se continúan publicando escritos póstumos y la influencia de su pensamiento se extiende paulatinamente a diversos ámbitos de las ciencias sociales. Parte central de este complejo pensamiento se desarrolla con la ayuda de conceptos que Luhmann adaptó de la biología de Humberto Maturana. En este trabajo se explica el modo de esta vinculación y los alcances que tiene para la comprensión de la sociedad globalizada moderna. , The article presents a synopsis of the fruitful relationship between Niklas Luhmann and Humberto Maturana. The Luhmannian theory is a conceptual structure whose dimensions include the understanding of the social as a whole. Notwithstanding the passing of the author in 1998, his posthumous writings are still being published and the influence of his thinking is gradually extended to several domains within social sciences. A core part of that complex thinking was developed with the benefit of concepts that Luhmann adapted from Humberto Maturana's biology. This study explains the workings of such tie and its reach for understanding modern globalized society.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Foerster, H. v.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Imprint: Springer, New York, NY, 1st ed. 2003 edition, 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"UnderstandingPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{foerster_understanding_2003,\n\taddress = {New York, NY},\n\tedition = {1st ed. 2003},\n\ttitle = {Understanding {Understanding}: {Essays} on {Cybernetics} and {Cognition}},\n\tisbn = {978-0-387-21722-2},\n\tshorttitle = {Understanding {Understanding}},\n\turl = {https://www.alice.id.tue.nl/references/foerster-2003.pdf},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/b97451},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Imprint: Springer},\n\tauthor = {Foerster, Heinz von},\n\tyear = {2003},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2002\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Laws of Form and Form Dynamics.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kauffman, L. H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(2): 49–63. February 2002.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LawsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{kauffman_laws_2002,\n\ttitle = {Laws of {Form} and {Form} {Dynamics}},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tissn = {1756-6177},\n\turl = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261850139_Laws_of_Form_and_Form_Dynamics},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tjournal = {Cybernetics \\& Human Knowing},\n\tpublisher = {Imprint Academic},\n\tauthor = {Kauffman, Louis H.},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tpages = {49--63},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Linked: the new science of networks.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Barabási, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cambridge, Mass. : Perseus Pub., Perseus Publishing edition, 2002.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"Linked:Paper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{barabasi_linked_2002,\n\tedition = {Perseus Publishing},\n\ttitle = {Linked: the new science of networks},\n\tisbn = {978-0-7382-0667-7},\n\tshorttitle = {Linked},\n\turl = {http://archive.org/details/linkednewscience00bara},\n\tabstract = {Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-265) and index; We've long suspected that we live in a small world, where everything is connected to everything else. Indeed, networks are pervasive--from the human brain to the Internet to the economy to our group of friends. These linkages, it turns out, aren't random. All networks, to the great surprise of scientists, have an underlying order and follow simple laws. Understanding the structure and behavior of these networks will help us do some amazing things, from designing the optimal organization of a firm to stopping a disease outbreak before it spreads catastrophically. In Linked, Barabási, a physicist whose work has revolutionized the study of networks, traces the development of this rapidly unfolding science and introduces us to the scientists carrying out this pioneering work. These "new cartographers" are mapping networks in a wide range of scientific disciplines, proving that social networks, corporations, and cells are more similar than they are different, and providing important new insights into the interconnected world around us. This knowledge, says Barabási, can shed light on the robustness of the Internet, the spread of fads and viruses, even the future of democracy},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tpublisher = {Cambridge, Mass. : Perseus Pub.},\n\tauthor = {Barabási, Albert-László},\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tkeywords = {System theory},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-265) and index; We've long suspected that we live in a small world, where everything is connected to everything else. Indeed, networks are pervasive–from the human brain to the Internet to the economy to our group of friends. These linkages, it turns out, aren't random. All networks, to the great surprise of scientists, have an underlying order and follow simple laws. Understanding the structure and behavior of these networks will help us do some amazing things, from designing the optimal organization of a firm to stopping a disease outbreak before it spreads catastrophically. In Linked, Barabási, a physicist whose work has revolutionized the study of networks, traces the development of this rapidly unfolding science and introduces us to the scientists carrying out this pioneering work. These \"new cartographers\" are mapping networks in a wide range of scientific disciplines, proving that social networks, corporations, and cells are more similar than they are different, and providing important new insights into the interconnected world around us. This knowledge, says Barabási, can shed light on the robustness of the Internet, the spread of fads and viruses, even the future of democracy\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 2000\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The reality of the mass media.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Cultural memory in the presentStanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, 1. publ edition, 2000.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ThePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_reality_2000,\n\taddress = {Stanford, Calif},\n\tedition = {1. publ},\n\tseries = {Cultural memory in the present},\n\ttitle = {The reality of the mass media},\n\tisbn = {978-0-8047-4077-7 978-0-8047-4076-0},\n\turl = {https://monoskop.org/images/6/6c/Luhmann_Niklas_The_Reality_of_the_Mass_Media.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {Stanford University Press},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\ttranslator = {Coss, Kathlenn},\n\tyear = {2000},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1998\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sistemas sociales: Lineamientos para una teoría general.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Autores, textos y temas Ciencias SocialesAnthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Barcelona, 1 edition, 1998.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"SistemasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_sistemas_1998,\n\taddress = {Barcelona},\n\tedition = {1},\n\tseries = {Autores, textos y temas {Ciencias} {Sociales}},\n\ttitle = {Sistemas sociales: {Lineamientos} para una teoría general},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7658-493-4},\n\tshorttitle = {Sistemas sociales},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6ajS9ka_eIkVHZwaGlfWHA4REk/view?resourcekey=0-DXs1J4hMQ0lTPL7W3xmh5w},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tnumber = {15},\n\tpublisher = {Anthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\ttranslator = {Pappe, Silvia and Erker, Brunhilde},\n\tyear = {1998},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1997\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n A Ontologia Da Realidade.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maturana, H.; Magro, C.; Graciano, M.; and Vaz, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of HumanitasUFMG, Belo Horizonte, April 1997.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{maturana_ontologia_1997,\n\taddress = {Belo Horizonte},\n\tseries = {Humanitas},\n\ttitle = {A {Ontologia} {Da} {Realidade}},\n\tisbn = {978-85-85266-17-2},\n\tlanguage = {pt-BR},\n\tpublisher = {UFMG},\n\tauthor = {Maturana, Humberto and Magro, Cristina and Graciano, Miriam and Vaz, Nelson},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tkeywords = {Metafísica},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Organización y decisión . Autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Biblioteca A SociedadAnthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana - Potificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Barcelona, 1997.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OrganizaciónPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_organizacion_1997,\n\taddress = {Barcelona},\n\tseries = {Biblioteca {A} {Sociedad}},\n\ttitle = {Organización y decisión . {Autopoiesis}, acción y entendimiento comunicativo},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7658-517-7},\n\turl = {https://circulosemiotico.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/luhmann-niklas-organizacion-y-decision-autopoiesis-accion-y-entendimiento-comunicativo.pdf},\n\tnumber = {27},\n\tpublisher = {Anthropos - Universidad Iberoamericana - Potificia Universidad Católica de Chile},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\teditor = {Rodriguez Mansilla, Dario},\n\tyear = {1997},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1996\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La ciencia de la sociedad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Autores, textos y temas ciencias socialesUniversidad Iberoamericana, Mexico, 1996.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LaPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_niklas_ciencia_1996,\n\taddress = {Mexico},\n\tseries = {Autores, textos y temas ciencias sociales},\n\ttitle = {La ciencia de la sociedad},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7658-491-0},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MT3f2na-DxRvSDB-JGy1W-SecI6JIxdM/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tnumber = {10},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\ttranslator = {Pappe, Silvia and Erker, Brunhilde and segura, Luis Felipe},\n\tyear = {1996},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1993\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El sistema educativo (problemas de reflexión).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.; and Schorr, K. E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Laberinto de CristalUdG - UIA - ITESO, Guadalajara, Jalisco, 1a en español edition, 1993.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"ElPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{luhmann_sistema_1993,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\tedition = {1a en español},\n\tseries = {Laberinto de {Cristal}},\n\ttitle = {El sistema educativo (problemas de reflexión)},\n\tisbn = {968-895-482-9},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yUDlBry4EnPfm1tRvvoWlPmVwvEJQqwh/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {UdG - UIA - ITESO},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas and Schorr, Karl Eberhard},\n\ttranslator = {Reinshagen, Olivia},\n\tyear = {1993},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1992\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n What is Communication?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Luhmann, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Communication Theory, 2(3): 251–259. August 1992.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WhatPaper\n  \n \n\n \n \n doi\n  \n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{luhmannWhatCommunication1992,\n\ttitle = {What is {Communication}?},\n\tvolume = {2},\n\tcopyright = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm\\_license\\_1.1},\n\tissn = {1050-3293, 1468-2885},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6ajS9ka_eIkVjJrb0FwaC1Bdnc/view?usp=drive_link&resourcekey=0-USxYQg_suD-xHnBqpDPutg},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2026-02-23},\n\tjournal = {Communication Theory},\n\tauthor = {Luhmann, Niklas},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tpages = {251--259},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1991\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las Semillas de la Cibernética: Obras Escogidas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Foerster, H. v.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Colección Teerapia FamliarGedisa, Barcelona, España, 1991.\n Google-Books-ID: xlyMSgAACAAJ\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LasPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n  \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{foerster_semillas_1991,\n\taddress = {Barcelona, España},\n\tseries = {Colección {Teerapia} {Famliar}},\n\ttitle = {Las {Semillas} de la {Cibernética}: {Obras} {Escogidas}},\n\tisbn = {978-84-7432-414-3},\n\tshorttitle = {Las {Semillas} de la {Cibernética}},\n\turl = {https://monoskop.org/images/2/24/Von_Foerster_Heinz_Las_semillas_de_la_cibernetica_1991.pdf},\n\tabstract = {Los trabajos de Heinz von Foerster reunidos en esta obra abarcan desde su interés por los temas autoorganizadores hasta la elaboración de los pilares conceptuales de la cibernética de segundo orden, su aplicación a las ciencias sociales en los campos afines a la problemática del terapeuta familiar y algunas reflexiones sobre ética, filosofia de la ciencia, futuro y sociedad. El terapeuta encontrará aquí los desarrollos fundamentales sobre nociones claves de la cibernética, que han estado informando durante los últimos años el campo de la terapia familiar. Tendrá así la oportunidad de establecer por sí mismo la conexión entre esos conceptos a nivel epistemológico y su propia disciplina. Podrá, por fin, adquirir instrumentos conceptuales que le permitan evitar ser un mero técnico, repetidor de «modelos» esotéricos, y más bien le brindará la oportunidad única de aprender a pensar sistemáticamente. El Dr. Marcelo Pakman, quien ha realizado la tarea de compilación, traducción y presentación de los trabajos de von Foerster, es psiquiatra, especializado en terapia familiar, epistemólogo y gran conocedor del lenguaje cibernético. «Sin sus ensayos introductorios --dice el autor-- la conexión entre los pensamientos expresados en mis conferencias y el proceso y la práctica terapéutica no se hubiera vuelto tan transparente.»},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tpublisher = {Gedisa},\n\tauthor = {Foerster, Heinz von},\n\teditor = {Pakman, Marcelo},\n\tcollaborator = {Sluzki, Carlos},\n\tyear = {1991},\n\tnote = {Google-Books-ID: xlyMSgAACAAJ},\n\tkeywords = {Psychology / General},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Los trabajos de Heinz von Foerster reunidos en esta obra abarcan desde su interés por los temas autoorganizadores hasta la elaboración de los pilares conceptuales de la cibernética de segundo orden, su aplicación a las ciencias sociales en los campos afines a la problemática del terapeuta familiar y algunas reflexiones sobre ética, filosofia de la ciencia, futuro y sociedad. El terapeuta encontrará aquí los desarrollos fundamentales sobre nociones claves de la cibernética, que han estado informando durante los últimos años el campo de la terapia familiar. Tendrá así la oportunidad de establecer por sí mismo la conexión entre esos conceptos a nivel epistemológico y su propia disciplina. Podrá, por fin, adquirir instrumentos conceptuales que le permitan evitar ser un mero técnico, repetidor de «modelos» esotéricos, y más bien le brindará la oportunidad única de aprender a pensar sistemáticamente. El Dr. Marcelo Pakman, quien ha realizado la tarea de compilación, traducción y presentación de los trabajos de von Foerster, es psiquiatra, especializado en terapia familiar, epistemólogo y gran conocedor del lenguaje cibernético. «Sin sus ensayos introductorios –dice el autor– la conexión entre los pensamientos expresados en mis conferencias y el proceso y la práctica terapéutica no se hubiera vuelto tan transparente.»\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1989\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Lenguaje y realidad: El origen de lo humano.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Maturana, H.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales, 22: 77–81. 1989.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LenguajePaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{maturana_lenguaje_1989,\n\ttitle = {Lenguaje y realidad: {El} origen de lo humano},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tissn = {0004-0533},\n\turl = {https://biologiachile.cl/biological_research/VOL22_1989/N2/Humberto_Maturana.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tjournal = {Archivos de Biología y Medicina Experimentales},\n\tauthor = {Maturana, Humberto, Maturana},\n\tyear = {1989},\n\tpages = {77--81},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n On Reflexivity in Human Communication.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Krippendorff, K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Temple Conference on Discourse Analysis, volume 253, pages 1–29, March 1989. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"OnPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{krippendorff_reflexivity_1989,\n\ttitle = {On {Reflexivity} in {Human} {Communication}},\n\tvolume = {253},\n\turl = {https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/1898},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\turldate = {2025-02-10},\n\tbooktitle = {Temple {Conference} on {Discourse} {Analysis}},\n\tauthor = {Krippendorff, Klaus},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {1989},\n\tpages = {1--29},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1973\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Wirklichkeit und Reflexion:.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fahrenbach, H.; and Schulz, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n of Geburtstag [Festschrift]G. Neske, Pfullingen, 1973.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"WirklichkeitPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{fahrenbach_wirklichkeit_1973,\n\taddress = {Pfullingen},\n\tseries = {Geburtstag [{Festschrift}]},\n\ttitle = {Wirklichkeit und {Reflexion}:},\n\tisbn = {978-3-7885-0037-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Wirklichkeit und {Reflexion}},\n\turl = {http://archive.org/details/wirklichkeitundr0000unse},\n\tlanguage = {ger},\n\tnumber = {Zum. 60},\n\tpublisher = {G. Neske},\n\tauthor = {Fahrenbach, Helmut and Schulz, Walter},\n\tyear = {1973},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n  \n 1972\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n
\n
\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Laws of Form.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Spencer Brown, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n The Julian Press Inc. Publishers, New York, 1th American Edition edition, 1972.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n \"LawsPaper\n  \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n  \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n  \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@book{spencer_brown_laws_1972,\n\taddress = {New York},\n\tedition = {1th American Edition},\n\ttitle = {Laws of {Form}},\n\turl = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KlP46YunTobQ7HHi5-su9R0qfYcnPDBn/view?usp=drive_link},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tpublisher = {The Julian Press Inc. Publishers},\n\tauthor = {Spencer Brown, George},\n\tyear = {1972},\n}\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n
\n"}; document.write(bibbase_data.data);