\n

\n \n 2025\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n PREreview of \"Qualitative tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behavior: a scoping review\".\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Miller, J.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Umpierre, D.; Mahmoud, R. S. G.; Li, X.; Akuma, I.; and Osadebe, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n December 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"PREreview$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{jennifer_miller_prereview_2025,\n\ttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Qualitative} tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behavior: a scoping review"},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Qualitative} tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behavior},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.17781579},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.17781579},\n\tabstract = {This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17781579.\n\n\nThis review is the result of a virtual, collaborative Live Review discussion held on Tuesday, November 11, 2025, and Friday, November 14, 2025, organized and hosted by the  PREreview Club of Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11). The discussion was joined by 9 people: 3 facilitators, 4 review authors and 2 discussion participants (Ava Chan and Mercury Shitindo). We thank all participants whose thoughtful and generous contributions made this review possible. The review authors dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to synthesize the notes and prepare this final report. A final synthesis was prepared by Rosario Rogel-Salazar and reviewed by all review authors.\nSummary\nThis scoping review investigates how qualitative tools—interview guides, focus-group guides, open-ended questionnaires—have been developed, applied, and validated to study researcher behavior using behavioral frameworks such as COM-B, TDF, BCW, and A-COM-B. Using a preregistered protocol and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the authors identified 27 studies published through September 2024 and extracted detailed information about methodological design, theoretical integration, openness, and instrument availability.\nThe review makes a valuable contribution by mapping an emerging methodological landscape, highlighting widespread open-access practices and the proliferation of behavioral-model–informed qualitative instruments. However, transparency around tool development, validation procedures, and theoretical integration remains inconsistent. Strengthening sections on methodological clarity, conceptual framing, and reporting of study selection would significantly enhance the overall utility and rigor of the manuscript.\nMajor concerns and feedback\n\n\nInsufficient transparency in study selection and PRISMA reporting. Reviewers struggled to understand how the initial {\\textasciitilde}5,000 records were narrowed to 27 included studies. Numerical inconsistencies in the PRISMA flowchart (e.g., identical counts for removed duplicates and ineligible records) further complicate interpretation. Recommendation: Correct PRISMA counts; provide clearer explanations of exclusion criteria; optionally list excluded studies or categorize reasons for exclusion to improve reproducibility.\n\nIncomplete conceptual framing of theoretical integration. The conclusions strongly emphasize underuse or superficial use of behavioral frameworks, yet this normative argument is not sufficiently introduced or justified early in the manuscript. Recommendation: Strengthen the Background by explaining why deep theoretical integration matters, drawing on implementation science and qualitative research design sources cited later in the paper.\n\nLimited search of grey literature and implications for bias. The review did not search key repositories where qualitative tools are often shared (OSF, Zenodo, Figshare, protocols.io). This omission likely reinforces the dominance of the Global North, health-science publications observed in the sample. Recommendation: Explicitly acknowledge this limitation and, if feasible, conduct a supplementary targeted grey literature search.\n\nAmbiguous definition of "open access" and "open tools". The term "open" is used broadly but without clear definitions. It is unclear whether "open" includes supplemental PDFs, licensed repositories, materials available upon request, or fully reusable resources with open licenses. Recommendation: Add operational definitions and coding criteria for openness and, if needed, revise results to reflect consistent categorization.\n\nAmbiguity in inclusion logic for "qualitative tools". About 41\\% of included studies used questionnaires, which can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed. Inclusion criteria do not specify how qualitative components were identified. Recommendation: Clarify how the authors determined whether a questionnaire qualified as a qualitative instrument.\n\nIssues of internal consistency. Reviewers noted mismatches in the reported number of included studies (27 vs. 28), discrepancies between the preregistered plan and manuscript (e.g., number of piloted studies), and conflicting statements across sections. Recommendation: Perform a careful consistency check across the manuscript.\nMinor concerns and feedback\n\n\nIssues in tables and figures\n\n\nPRISMA numerical errors require correction.\n\nSome author names are inconsistently formatted (e.g., "Hughes, Williamson \\& Young" should be "Hughes et al.").\n\n Table 3 could be made more useful by merging "publication status" and "tool availability", or by graphically indicating depth of theoretical integration.\n\nAccessibility and formatting issues\n\n\nAvoid full-justified text for accessibility.\n\nIn the data extraction section, rephrase to avoid unnecessary nested parentheses and clarify ambiguous phrasing (e.g., "where the sample is inserted").\n\nProvide short definitions or consistent use of acronyms (COM-B, BCW, TDF, etc.).\n\nCitation and reference inconsistencies\n\n\nAdd citations for PCC framework, and theoretical integration literature, and the seven previously known articles used to develop the search strategy.\nConcluding remarks\nThis scoping review provides an important contribution to qualitative meta-research by mapping how behavioral frameworks are used to study researcher behavior. Its strengths include a transparent pre-registered protocol, clear reporting of data extraction, and extensive descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Addressing the major methodological and reporting concerns identified above—particularly those related to transparency, conceptual framing, and definitions of openness—will significantly increase the clarity and practical value of the work.\nThe manuscript will be valuable not only to researchers designing qualitative behavioral studies, but also to methodologists, open science practitioners, funders, journal editors, and graduate advisors who support rigorous and theoretically grounded research practices.\nCompeting interests\nThe review authors declare no competing interests related to the authors or content of this preprint.\nThis review represents the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of FORCE11 as an organization.\nUse of Artificial Intelligence (AI)\nThe authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.\n\n    \nCompeting interests\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\n\n    \nUse of Artificial Intelligence (AI)\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-12-10},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Jennifer Miller and Rosario Rogel-Salazar and Daniel Umpierre and Randa Salah Gomaa Mahmoud and Xiuqi Li and Ifeanyichukwu Akuma and Ngozi Osadebe},\n\tcollaborator = {{Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11)}},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17781579. This review is the result of a virtual, collaborative Live Review discussion held on Tuesday, November 11, 2025, and Friday, November 14, 2025, organized and hosted by the PREreview Club of Future of Research Communication and e-Scholarship (FORCE11). The discussion was joined by 9 people: 3 facilitators, 4 review authors and 2 discussion participants (Ava Chan and Mercury Shitindo). We thank all participants whose thoughtful and generous contributions made this review possible. The review authors dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to synthesize the notes and prepare this final report. A final synthesis was prepared by Rosario Rogel-Salazar and reviewed by all review authors. Summary This scoping review investigates how qualitative tools—interview guides, focus-group guides, open-ended questionnaires—have been developed, applied, and validated to study researcher behavior using behavioral frameworks such as COM-B, TDF, BCW, and A-COM-B. Using a preregistered protocol and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the authors identified 27 studies published through September 2024 and extracted detailed information about methodological design, theoretical integration, openness, and instrument availability. The review makes a valuable contribution by mapping an emerging methodological landscape, highlighting widespread open-access practices and the proliferation of behavioral-model–informed qualitative instruments. However, transparency around tool development, validation procedures, and theoretical integration remains inconsistent. Strengthening sections on methodological clarity, conceptual framing, and reporting of study selection would significantly enhance the overall utility and rigor of the manuscript. Major concerns and feedback Insufficient transparency in study selection and PRISMA reporting. Reviewers struggled to understand how the initial ~5,000 records were narrowed to 27 included studies. Numerical inconsistencies in the PRISMA flowchart (e.g., identical counts for removed duplicates and ineligible records) further complicate interpretation. Recommendation: Correct PRISMA counts; provide clearer explanations of exclusion criteria; optionally list excluded studies or categorize reasons for exclusion to improve reproducibility. Incomplete conceptual framing of theoretical integration. The conclusions strongly emphasize underuse or superficial use of behavioral frameworks, yet this normative argument is not sufficiently introduced or justified early in the manuscript. Recommendation: Strengthen the Background by explaining why deep theoretical integration matters, drawing on implementation science and qualitative research design sources cited later in the paper. Limited search of grey literature and implications for bias. The review did not search key repositories where qualitative tools are often shared (OSF, Zenodo, Figshare, protocols.io). This omission likely reinforces the dominance of the Global North, health-science publications observed in the sample. Recommendation: Explicitly acknowledge this limitation and, if feasible, conduct a supplementary targeted grey literature search. Ambiguous definition of \"open access\" and \"open tools\". The term \"open\" is used broadly but without clear definitions. It is unclear whether \"open\" includes supplemental PDFs, licensed repositories, materials available upon request, or fully reusable resources with open licenses. Recommendation: Add operational definitions and coding criteria for openness and, if needed, revise results to reflect consistent categorization. Ambiguity in inclusion logic for \"qualitative tools\". About 41% of included studies used questionnaires, which can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed. Inclusion criteria do not specify how qualitative components were identified. Recommendation: Clarify how the authors determined whether a questionnaire qualified as a qualitative instrument. Issues of internal consistency. Reviewers noted mismatches in the reported number of included studies (27 vs. 28), discrepancies between the preregistered plan and manuscript (e.g., number of piloted studies), and conflicting statements across sections. Recommendation: Perform a careful consistency check across the manuscript. Minor concerns and feedback Issues in tables and figures PRISMA numerical errors require correction. Some author names are inconsistently formatted (e.g., \"Hughes, Williamson & Young\" should be \"Hughes et al.\"). Table 3 could be made more useful by merging \"publication status\" and \"tool availability\", or by graphically indicating depth of theoretical integration. Accessibility and formatting issues Avoid full-justified text for accessibility. In the data extraction section, rephrase to avoid unnecessary nested parentheses and clarify ambiguous phrasing (e.g., \"where the sample is inserted\"). Provide short definitions or consistent use of acronyms (COM-B, BCW, TDF, etc.). Citation and reference inconsistencies Add citations for PCC framework, and theoretical integration literature, and the seven previously known articles used to develop the search strategy. Concluding remarks This scoping review provides an important contribution to qualitative meta-research by mapping how behavioral frameworks are used to study researcher behavior. Its strengths include a transparent pre-registered protocol, clear reporting of data extraction, and extensive descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Addressing the major methodological and reporting concerns identified above—particularly those related to transparency, conceptual framing, and definitions of openness—will significantly increase the clarity and practical value of the work. The manuscript will be valuable not only to researchers designing qualitative behavioral studies, but also to methodologists, open science practitioners, funders, journal editors, and graduate advisors who support rigorous and theoretically grounded research practices. Competing interests The review authors declare no competing interests related to the authors or content of this preprint. This review represents the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of FORCE11 as an organization. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n PREreview of \"Comparing the outputs of intramural and extramural grants funded by National Institutes of Health\".\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bajaj, T.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Rasania, S.; Venkatesan, P.; Sesay, M.; Mitra, S.; and Chalwadi, U. K.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n October 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"PREreview$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{teena_bajaj_prereview_2025,\n\ttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Comparing} the outputs of intramural and extramural grants funded by {National} {Institutes} of {Health}"},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.17353888},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.17353888},\n\tabstract = {This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17353888.\n\nThis study fills a significant gap in the literature to date by conducting a comprehensive, side-by-side comparison of products arising from intramural and extramurally funded NIH research projects. The authors constructed a vast dataset consisting of 98,648 projects (97,054 extramural and 1,594 intramural) from 2009 through 2019, correlating with more than 621,000 publications. Through the application of modern bibliometric metrics, such as, -i.e., publication number, Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), and clinical translation indices (APT, clinical citations),-the study sought to determine which funding modality has a greater influence and cost-effectiveness in pursuing the NIH mission. One notable finding was that while extramural research showed greater cost-effectiveness in producing academic publications and citations, intramural research showed greater efficiency in producing clinically relevant outputs. This conclusion is significant given the fact that intramural projects were not overwhelmingly focused on human research; they still showed a stronger association with clinical outcomes. One of the main virtues of the study is the enormous scale of the dataset —(98,648 projects linked to over 621,000 publications),— which makes the findings robust and influential. The use of updated bibliometric measures also adds depth and credibility to the analysis. The study's implementation of robust, contemporary metrics presents a valuable framework with potential applications for future research impact evaluations.\n\nHowever, the 10-year window (2009-2019), limited by intramural data availability, might not be sufficient for truly measuring long-term impact. The reliance on a simplistic classification scheme based only on activity codes may introduce errors, while excluding jointly funded publications could underestimate the impact of collaborative work. Additionally, the wide confidence intervals in the data leave room for uncertainty. Nevertheless, by showing how different types of NIH funding shape not just scientific output but clinical relevance, the study adds valuable nuance to a debate that has surprisingly received little attention in recent decades.\n\nMajor concerns and feedback:\n\n\n\n\n\nThis description of the propensity score matching approach does not include enough detail to aid in reproducibility. Crucial information is missing, such as the actual algorithm used to match (e.g., nearest neighbor or optimal matching), the method followed with respect to replacement while matching, the distance applied to the caliper, and the plan followed for handling multiple match or sparse match cases. \n\n\n\n\nThe authors are advised to describe the matching algorithm used predominantly, to define the caliper width (e.g., 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the reproducibility score), and to define the matching ratio (e.g., 1:1 or 1:k). They should also describe the process followed to handle ties and report whether there were any projects dropped because of an insufficiency of appropriate matches.\n\n\n\n\nThe handling of propensity score matching is insufficiently described. For example, the authors have not clarified how multiple matches were dealt with, how data was managed when matches were unavailable, or how criteria were prioritized (tier 1 mandatory vs. tier 2 flexible). Similarly, the statistical power calculation for a 10-year dataset should be better justified. Regression methods, while mentioned, remain unclear and require further explanation\n\n\n\n\nIt is advisable to include the matching ratio used (e.g., 1:1 or 1:k) and explain whether matching was done with or without replacement, as this detail is critical for reproducibility.\n\n\n\n\nThe choice of a 10-year window (2009-2019) is presented as a data availability constraint rather than a methodological choice. This short timeframe is a significant limitation for assessing "long-term impact," particularly for clinical translation, which can take decades. The conclusions about impact and cost-effectiveness may be premature.\n\n\n\n\nIt is advisable to the authors should more strongly frame this as a key limitation in the discussion. They could also conduct a sensitivity analysis on a subset of projects from the earliest years (e.g., 2009-2011) to see if impact metrics differ for older projects, providing some insight into time-based trends.\n\n\n\n\nIt is advisable to emphasize in the Discussion section that the restricted 10-year window represents a major limitation for assessing long-term impact, and that this constraint may influence interpretation of the findings.\n\n\n\n\nThe analysis spans only a 10-year window (2009–2019), primarily because intramural data was only available from 2008. This may be too limited to truly capture long-term impact, especially given the long gestation period of clinical research outcomes. The authors should justify why this timeframe is sufficient or discuss how it constrains conclusions.\n\n\n\n\nThe claim that "intramural work is more aligned with NIH's mission" is an interpretive leap not fully supported by the data presented. The study shows intramural research is more clinically oriented, but the NIH mission is broad, encompassing fundamental discovery, training, and public health. This overstates the findings.\n\n\n\n\nThe suggestion is that the language should be moderated to precisely reflect the results. For example: "Our findings suggest that the intramural program demonstrates a particular strength in producing clinically relevant outputs, which is one critical component of the NIH's broader mission."\n\n\n\n\nIt is advisable to include the moderated rephrasing example here directly, e.g., "Our findings suggest that the intramural program demonstrates a particular strength in producing clinically relevant outputs, which is one critical component of the NIH's broader mission." This helps make the feedback more actionable.\n\n\n\n\nThe claim that intramural research is more aligned with NIH's mission feels overstated. Given the smaller number of intramural projects and their wide confidence intervals, the evidence does not convincingly support such a broad assertion. A more cautious interpretation would strengthen the paper's credibility.\n\n\n\n\nThe exclusion of collaboratively funded publications is a major methodological decision that may systematically bias the results. It could disproportionately undervalue the contribution of one funding mechanism (likely intramural, which may rely more on collaborations) and misrepresent the collaborative nature of modern science.\n\n\n\n\nThe suggestion is that while re-inclusion may be complex, the authors must discuss this limitation more thoroughly, explicitly stating how this exclusion might have skewed the comparisons of output and impact between the two funding types.\n\n\n\n\nExcluding jointly funded outputs might disproportionately affect intramural projects and should be discussed as a potential source of bias in the limitations section. Consider adding a brief sensitivity analysis, including these publications if data permit.\n\n\n\nMinor concerns and feedback:\n\n\n\n\n\nThe research's specific aims are badly phrased in the last section of the introduction. We suggest the authors state a definite sentence or a short paragraph enumerating systematically the main and secondary aims of the research (e.g., "The aims of the study are: 1) To compare the bibliometric output. 2) To assess the cost-effectiveness.)\n\n\n\n\nThe regression approaches, as stated, are not discussed with enough clarity across a general profile of people. The authors should include in the methods section a brief, accessible description of the objective of each regression model applied, with corresponding technical statistical definitions.\n\n\n\n\nThere are certain inaccuracies and potential for greater clarity, such as an incompatibility in color representation in a figure legend (green/red compared with green/blue) and unclear axis labels. The authors should: 1). Modify the Figure 2 legend so that it exactly matches the colors used. 2). Resize the Y-axis title of Figure 1 to something more descriptive, such as "Intramural: Extramural Proportion Ratio," with an explanation that a value {\\textgreater}1 indicates an intramural focus and {\\textless}1 means extramural focus. Figure 2's caption incorrectly refers to green and red when the figure uses green and blue. In Figure 1, the Y-axis label could be simplified—for example, "Intramural: Extramural Proportion Ratio" would make the metric immediately interpretable ({\\textgreater}1 intramural focus, {\\textless}1 extramural focus)\n\n\n\n\nThe manuscript is brief and could be enhanced through greater clarification of the summary of results, interpretation in the framework of what has been written before, and limitations and strengths. The authors should redesign the text with clear subheadings (e.g., "Main Results," "Comparison with Previous Studies," "Advantages and Disadvantages," "Implications") to increase readability and ensure each section attains adequate prominence.\n\n\n\n\nWhile ethically low-risk, the manuscript does lack an official statement declaring that ethical approval was not required. The authors should include a very short sentence in the methods section: "This study drew only on publicly available, aggregated data concerning research grants and publications, and conducted no research involving human subjects; accordingly, ethical approval was not necessary.". Although the study uses only retrospective, publicly available data, an explicit statement clarifying that ethical approval is not applicable would be useful. \n\n\n\n\nThe much smaller number of intramural projects means that their results are inherently less precise. This limitation should be emphasized more directly, along with the risk of overinterpreting findings. Reiterate that this limitation should be highlighted within the Discussion to avoid overinterpreting the relative performance of intramural projects.\n\n\n\n\nThe exclusion of jointly funded publications could underestimate collaboration and impact, particularly for intramural research. This limitation is acknowledged but deserves more explicit discussion in terms of how it biases the results.\n\n\n\n\nThe limitations are listed but not fully unpacked. The authors could strengthen this section by explicitly addressing how each limitation (e.g., exclusion of collaborations, smaller intramural sample) impacts robustness and by clarifying what steps were taken to reduce potential bias.\n\n\n\n\nThe Discussion is concise but too compressed. Clearly separating the strengths from the limitations, adding short summaries after each results section, and slightly expanding the implications would make the manuscript easier to read and interpret.\n\n\n\nCompeting interests\n\nTeena Bajaj and Rosario Rogel-Salazar were facilitators and organizers of this call. \n\nUse of Artificial Intelligence (AI)\n\nThe authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-11-20},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Teena Bajaj and Rosario Rogel-Salazar and Shailee Rasania and Prasakthi Venkatesan and Morlai Sesay and Sayan Mitra and Uday Kumar Chalwadi},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17353888. This study fills a significant gap in the literature to date by conducting a comprehensive, side-by-side comparison of products arising from intramural and extramurally funded NIH research projects. The authors constructed a vast dataset consisting of 98,648 projects (97,054 extramural and 1,594 intramural) from 2009 through 2019, correlating with more than 621,000 publications. Through the application of modern bibliometric metrics, such as, -i.e., publication number, Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), and clinical translation indices (APT, clinical citations),-the study sought to determine which funding modality has a greater influence and cost-effectiveness in pursuing the NIH mission. One notable finding was that while extramural research showed greater cost-effectiveness in producing academic publications and citations, intramural research showed greater efficiency in producing clinically relevant outputs. This conclusion is significant given the fact that intramural projects were not overwhelmingly focused on human research; they still showed a stronger association with clinical outcomes. One of the main virtues of the study is the enormous scale of the dataset —(98,648 projects linked to over 621,000 publications),— which makes the findings robust and influential. The use of updated bibliometric measures also adds depth and credibility to the analysis. The study's implementation of robust, contemporary metrics presents a valuable framework with potential applications for future research impact evaluations. However, the 10-year window (2009-2019), limited by intramural data availability, might not be sufficient for truly measuring long-term impact. The reliance on a simplistic classification scheme based only on activity codes may introduce errors, while excluding jointly funded publications could underestimate the impact of collaborative work. Additionally, the wide confidence intervals in the data leave room for uncertainty. Nevertheless, by showing how different types of NIH funding shape not just scientific output but clinical relevance, the study adds valuable nuance to a debate that has surprisingly received little attention in recent decades. Major concerns and feedback: This description of the propensity score matching approach does not include enough detail to aid in reproducibility. Crucial information is missing, such as the actual algorithm used to match (e.g., nearest neighbor or optimal matching), the method followed with respect to replacement while matching, the distance applied to the caliper, and the plan followed for handling multiple match or sparse match cases. The authors are advised to describe the matching algorithm used predominantly, to define the caliper width (e.g., 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the reproducibility score), and to define the matching ratio (e.g., 1:1 or 1:k). They should also describe the process followed to handle ties and report whether there were any projects dropped because of an insufficiency of appropriate matches. The handling of propensity score matching is insufficiently described. For example, the authors have not clarified how multiple matches were dealt with, how data was managed when matches were unavailable, or how criteria were prioritized (tier 1 mandatory vs. tier 2 flexible). Similarly, the statistical power calculation for a 10-year dataset should be better justified. Regression methods, while mentioned, remain unclear and require further explanation It is advisable to include the matching ratio used (e.g., 1:1 or 1:k) and explain whether matching was done with or without replacement, as this detail is critical for reproducibility. The choice of a 10-year window (2009-2019) is presented as a data availability constraint rather than a methodological choice. This short timeframe is a significant limitation for assessing \"long-term impact,\" particularly for clinical translation, which can take decades. The conclusions about impact and cost-effectiveness may be premature. It is advisable to the authors should more strongly frame this as a key limitation in the discussion. They could also conduct a sensitivity analysis on a subset of projects from the earliest years (e.g., 2009-2011) to see if impact metrics differ for older projects, providing some insight into time-based trends. It is advisable to emphasize in the Discussion section that the restricted 10-year window represents a major limitation for assessing long-term impact, and that this constraint may influence interpretation of the findings. The analysis spans only a 10-year window (2009–2019), primarily because intramural data was only available from 2008. This may be too limited to truly capture long-term impact, especially given the long gestation period of clinical research outcomes. The authors should justify why this timeframe is sufficient or discuss how it constrains conclusions. The claim that \"intramural work is more aligned with NIH's mission\" is an interpretive leap not fully supported by the data presented. The study shows intramural research is more clinically oriented, but the NIH mission is broad, encompassing fundamental discovery, training, and public health. This overstates the findings. The suggestion is that the language should be moderated to precisely reflect the results. For example: \"Our findings suggest that the intramural program demonstrates a particular strength in producing clinically relevant outputs, which is one critical component of the NIH's broader mission.\" It is advisable to include the moderated rephrasing example here directly, e.g., \"Our findings suggest that the intramural program demonstrates a particular strength in producing clinically relevant outputs, which is one critical component of the NIH's broader mission.\" This helps make the feedback more actionable. The claim that intramural research is more aligned with NIH's mission feels overstated. Given the smaller number of intramural projects and their wide confidence intervals, the evidence does not convincingly support such a broad assertion. A more cautious interpretation would strengthen the paper's credibility. The exclusion of collaboratively funded publications is a major methodological decision that may systematically bias the results. It could disproportionately undervalue the contribution of one funding mechanism (likely intramural, which may rely more on collaborations) and misrepresent the collaborative nature of modern science. The suggestion is that while re-inclusion may be complex, the authors must discuss this limitation more thoroughly, explicitly stating how this exclusion might have skewed the comparisons of output and impact between the two funding types. Excluding jointly funded outputs might disproportionately affect intramural projects and should be discussed as a potential source of bias in the limitations section. Consider adding a brief sensitivity analysis, including these publications if data permit. Minor concerns and feedback: The research's specific aims are badly phrased in the last section of the introduction. We suggest the authors state a definite sentence or a short paragraph enumerating systematically the main and secondary aims of the research (e.g., \"The aims of the study are: 1) To compare the bibliometric output. 2) To assess the cost-effectiveness.) The regression approaches, as stated, are not discussed with enough clarity across a general profile of people. The authors should include in the methods section a brief, accessible description of the objective of each regression model applied, with corresponding technical statistical definitions. There are certain inaccuracies and potential for greater clarity, such as an incompatibility in color representation in a figure legend (green/red compared with green/blue) and unclear axis labels. The authors should: 1). Modify the Figure 2 legend so that it exactly matches the colors used. 2). Resize the Y-axis title of Figure 1 to something more descriptive, such as \"Intramural: Extramural Proportion Ratio,\" with an explanation that a value \\textgreater1 indicates an intramural focus and \\textless1 means extramural focus. Figure 2's caption incorrectly refers to green and red when the figure uses green and blue. In Figure 1, the Y-axis label could be simplified—for example, \"Intramural: Extramural Proportion Ratio\" would make the metric immediately interpretable (\\textgreater1 intramural focus, \\textless1 extramural focus) The manuscript is brief and could be enhanced through greater clarification of the summary of results, interpretation in the framework of what has been written before, and limitations and strengths. The authors should redesign the text with clear subheadings (e.g., \"Main Results,\" \"Comparison with Previous Studies,\" \"Advantages and Disadvantages,\" \"Implications\") to increase readability and ensure each section attains adequate prominence. While ethically low-risk, the manuscript does lack an official statement declaring that ethical approval was not required. The authors should include a very short sentence in the methods section: \"This study drew only on publicly available, aggregated data concerning research grants and publications, and conducted no research involving human subjects; accordingly, ethical approval was not necessary.\". Although the study uses only retrospective, publicly available data, an explicit statement clarifying that ethical approval is not applicable would be useful. The much smaller number of intramural projects means that their results are inherently less precise. This limitation should be emphasized more directly, along with the risk of overinterpreting findings. Reiterate that this limitation should be highlighted within the Discussion to avoid overinterpreting the relative performance of intramural projects. The exclusion of jointly funded publications could underestimate collaboration and impact, particularly for intramural research. This limitation is acknowledged but deserves more explicit discussion in terms of how it biases the results. The limitations are listed but not fully unpacked. The authors could strengthen this section by explicitly addressing how each limitation (e.g., exclusion of collaborations, smaller intramural sample) impacts robustness and by clarifying what steps were taken to reduce potential bias. The Discussion is concise but too compressed. Clearly separating the strengths from the limitations, adding short summaries after each results section, and slightly expanding the implications would make the manuscript easier to read and interpret. Competing interests Teena Bajaj and Rosario Rogel-Salazar were facilitators and organizers of this call. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n PREreview of \"Reproducibility and replicability of qualitative research: an integrative review of concepts, barriers and enablers\".\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fairhurst, V.; Bajaj, T.; Tehran, D. A.; Landi, M.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and other authors , 2\n\n\n \n\n\n\n May 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"PREreview$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{vanessa_fairhurst_prereview_2025,\n\ttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Reproducibility} and replicability of qualitative research: an integrative review of concepts, barriers and enablers"},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Reproducibility} and replicability of qualitative research},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.15375661},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.15375661},\n\tabstract = {This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15375661.\n\n\nThis review is the result of a virtual, collaborative live review discussion on April 16th, 2025, organized and hosted by PREreview as part of the PREreview Champions Program 2025. The discussion was joined by 9 people: 2 facilitators and 7 cohort members of the PREreview 2025 Champions Program. We thank all participants who contributed to the discussion and made it possible for us to provide feedback on this preprint. The authors of this review have dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to help compose this final report using the notes from the Live Review. \nSummary\nThis study mainly addresses how reproducibility and replication are conceptualized and discussed within qualitative research and what factors and practices allow or hinder their application in qualitative research. These questions, clearly articulated on page 5 of the paper, reflect a critical and timely inquiry into how traditionally quantitative-oriented open science concepts intersect with qualitative research methodologies. The authors employ an integrative review method ideal for synthesizing empirical and theoretical literature to explore these themes. Drawing from 248 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature —including work from multiple disciplines such as health sciences and social sciences, which broadens the scope and relevance of the findings—and utilizing tools like Systematic Review Facility (SyRF) for data extraction and analysis, the sources were identified through searches in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, PubMed, APA PsychInfo, and JSTOR, followed by snowball sampling from included references.  The main findings show that reproducibility and replication don't work the same in qualitative research as in quantitative research. Trying to copy a qualitative study exactly is often not possible. This is because qualitative research is more subjective, often depends on the context, and involves the researcher's role and perspective. The study also points out significant challenges, like ethical issues with sharing data (e.g., protecting participant privacy). However, the authors also highlight things that can help, like keeping good records of how research is done, being open about the research process, and adapting open science tools to fit qualitative research rather than rejecting reproducibility outright, the study argues for rethinking it in qualitative terms—emphasizing transparency, traceability, and positionality. In the end, the paper argues for a more flexible and fair version of open science that respects and supports the unique ways qualitative research works while also acknowledging, as a limitation, the exclusive focus on English-language sources, which may overlook relevant perspectives from non-English-speaking contexts.\nList of major concerns and feedback\n\n\nThe review only includes English-language sources, which may exclude contributions from non-English-speaking communities.. It would strengthen the manuscript to explicitly address how this limitation may affect the global applicability of the findings, particularly in regions with different qualitative traditions. \n\nThe review presents a well-justified and appropriate integrative methodology, offering valuable insight into open science practices in qualitative research. However, the decision to conduct full-text screening, data extraction, and coding with a single reviewer raises concerns about potential bias and consistency. To strengthen the study's reliability, the authors are encouraged to clarify whether any strategies—such as double coding, consensus checks, or reflexive journaling—were used during the process. If no such measures were taken, a brief justification would help provide transparency and context for this methodological choice.\n\nWhile the authors aim to adapt reproducibility and replicability concepts to qualitative research, the justification and framework for this adaptation remain underdeveloped. Readers would benefit from clearer guidance on how these concepts should be applied in various qualitative fields. For instance, you can include specific examples, such as how reproducibility might be approached in ethnography or thematic analysis, which would make the recommendations more practical and actionable.\n\nThe review may be biased toward the Western world, particularly Europe and North America, as it does not include articles representing different ethical or epistemological traditions, and while this is not necessarily inadequate, it may be important to acknowledge that the scope of the conclusions is not global.  \nList of minor concerns and feedback\n\n\nThe authors describe the coding process at a high level. However, one could improve by briefly explaining how disagreements in coding were addressed, whether through discussion, consensus meetings, or cross-checking. Consider specifying whether any disagreement resolution methods were used and, if so, providing a brief description to enhance transparency and reproducibility.\n\nThe contrast between qualitative and quantitative research seems oversimplified. Revising this framing could better reflect the complexity of both approaches. A more nuanced discussion acknowledging the diversity and overlapping elements within both paradigms would improve the theoretical framing.\n\nThere is sample bias towards medical/health sciences (16.9\\%) and psychology (13.3\\%), fields where Open Science norms are more entrenched, while humanities and critical social sciences are underrepresented. It may be helpful to acknowledge this imbalance in the discussion or limitations sections and briefly reflect on how it could influence the findings or their generalizability.\nConcluding remarks\nThis paper is valuable in contributing to the conversation about open science in qualitative research. It uses strong methods and gives a fair look at both the challenges and opportunities in making qualitative research more open and transparent. \nWe thank the authors of the preprint for posting their work openly for feedback. We also thank all participants of the Live Review call for their time and for engaging in the lively discussion that generated this review.\n\n    \nCompeting interests\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-10-27},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Vanessa Fairhurst and Teena Bajaj and Domenico Azarnia Tehran and Michael Landi and Rosario Rogel-Salazar and 2 other authors},\n\tcollaborator = {{Review \\& Curate Network (RCN)}},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15375661. This review is the result of a virtual, collaborative live review discussion on April 16th, 2025, organized and hosted by PREreview as part of the PREreview Champions Program 2025. The discussion was joined by 9 people: 2 facilitators and 7 cohort members of the PREreview 2025 Champions Program. We thank all participants who contributed to the discussion and made it possible for us to provide feedback on this preprint. The authors of this review have dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to help compose this final report using the notes from the Live Review. Summary This study mainly addresses how reproducibility and replication are conceptualized and discussed within qualitative research and what factors and practices allow or hinder their application in qualitative research. These questions, clearly articulated on page 5 of the paper, reflect a critical and timely inquiry into how traditionally quantitative-oriented open science concepts intersect with qualitative research methodologies. The authors employ an integrative review method ideal for synthesizing empirical and theoretical literature to explore these themes. Drawing from 248 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature —including work from multiple disciplines such as health sciences and social sciences, which broadens the scope and relevance of the findings—and utilizing tools like Systematic Review Facility (SyRF) for data extraction and analysis, the sources were identified through searches in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, PubMed, APA PsychInfo, and JSTOR, followed by snowball sampling from included references. The main findings show that reproducibility and replication don't work the same in qualitative research as in quantitative research. Trying to copy a qualitative study exactly is often not possible. This is because qualitative research is more subjective, often depends on the context, and involves the researcher's role and perspective. The study also points out significant challenges, like ethical issues with sharing data (e.g., protecting participant privacy). However, the authors also highlight things that can help, like keeping good records of how research is done, being open about the research process, and adapting open science tools to fit qualitative research rather than rejecting reproducibility outright, the study argues for rethinking it in qualitative terms—emphasizing transparency, traceability, and positionality. In the end, the paper argues for a more flexible and fair version of open science that respects and supports the unique ways qualitative research works while also acknowledging, as a limitation, the exclusive focus on English-language sources, which may overlook relevant perspectives from non-English-speaking contexts. List of major concerns and feedback The review only includes English-language sources, which may exclude contributions from non-English-speaking communities.. It would strengthen the manuscript to explicitly address how this limitation may affect the global applicability of the findings, particularly in regions with different qualitative traditions. The review presents a well-justified and appropriate integrative methodology, offering valuable insight into open science practices in qualitative research. However, the decision to conduct full-text screening, data extraction, and coding with a single reviewer raises concerns about potential bias and consistency. To strengthen the study's reliability, the authors are encouraged to clarify whether any strategies—such as double coding, consensus checks, or reflexive journaling—were used during the process. If no such measures were taken, a brief justification would help provide transparency and context for this methodological choice. While the authors aim to adapt reproducibility and replicability concepts to qualitative research, the justification and framework for this adaptation remain underdeveloped. Readers would benefit from clearer guidance on how these concepts should be applied in various qualitative fields. For instance, you can include specific examples, such as how reproducibility might be approached in ethnography or thematic analysis, which would make the recommendations more practical and actionable. The review may be biased toward the Western world, particularly Europe and North America, as it does not include articles representing different ethical or epistemological traditions, and while this is not necessarily inadequate, it may be important to acknowledge that the scope of the conclusions is not global. List of minor concerns and feedback The authors describe the coding process at a high level. However, one could improve by briefly explaining how disagreements in coding were addressed, whether through discussion, consensus meetings, or cross-checking. Consider specifying whether any disagreement resolution methods were used and, if so, providing a brief description to enhance transparency and reproducibility. The contrast between qualitative and quantitative research seems oversimplified. Revising this framing could better reflect the complexity of both approaches. A more nuanced discussion acknowledging the diversity and overlapping elements within both paradigms would improve the theoretical framing. There is sample bias towards medical/health sciences (16.9%) and psychology (13.3%), fields where Open Science norms are more entrenched, while humanities and critical social sciences are underrepresented. It may be helpful to acknowledge this imbalance in the discussion or limitations sections and briefly reflect on how it could influence the findings or their generalizability. Concluding remarks This paper is valuable in contributing to the conversation about open science in qualitative research. It uses strong methods and gives a fair look at both the challenges and opportunities in making qualitative research more open and transparent. We thank the authors of the preprint for posting their work openly for feedback. We also thank all participants of the Live Review call for their time and for engaging in the lively discussion that generated this review. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n PREreview of \"Novel Fatigue Profiling Approach Highlights Temporal Dynamics of Human Sperm Motility\".\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Saderi, D.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Chidi Asuzu MBBS, M.; Olatoye, T. I.; and Collier, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n July 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"PREreview$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{daniela_saderi_prereview_2025,\n\ttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Novel} {Fatigue} {Profiling} {Approach} {Highlights} {Temporal} {Dynamics} of {Human} {Sperm} {Motility}"},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.15887836},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.15887836},\n\tabstract = {This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15887836.\n\n\nThis review is the result of a virtual, collaborative Live Review discussion organized and hosted by PREreview and JMIR Publications on June 26, 2025. The discussion was joined by 14 people: 2 facilitators from the PREreview Team, 1 member of the JMIR Publications team, 1 author, and 10 live review participants. The authors of this review have dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to help compose this final report using the notes from the Live Review. We thank all participants who contributed to the discussion and made it possible for us to provide feedback on this preprint.\nSummary\nThis preprint presents a well-structured study that introduces the concept of "sperm fatigue" as a novel framework for assessing motility deterioration in human sperm. The study aims to develop and validate a new profiling method to assess infra-trajectory motility decline in human spermatozoa. Using a metric termed the "Fatigue Index" and data from computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) systems, the authors demonstrate that infra-trajectory motility decline is both measurable and biologically plausible, with potential links to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. This approach aids in identifying sperm with potential subclinical impairments and informs the development of predictive biomarkers for sperm functionality and male fertility evaluation. The methodology is clearly described, and the inclusion of shared code and data exemplifies strong open science practices. Below, we summarize the main points discussed during the Live Review and offer suggestions for improving the manuscript. Minor enhancements to documentation and accessibility could further support its broader application across disciplines.\nList of major concerns and feedback:\n\n\nClarify dataset selection and segmentation process: The manuscript lacks sufficient detail regarding the selection and segmentation of video clips from the VISEM dataset. To improve transparency and reproducibility, please provide a clear explanation of how video segments were selected for analysis, including specific criteria such as duration, quality, sample characteristics, or relevance to the study's aims. Additionally, include a brief description of the origin of the VISEM dataset, emphasizing that the clips used in this study were curated from full-length videos. Please, clarify how the original dataset was constructed by its curators and how your study further selected, filtered, or modified these data. Finally, cite the original VISEM publication and relevant documentation to support clarity and reproducibility.\n\nMissing ethics statement: Although the study likely follows ethical standards, it would be best practice to include a short ethics statement. Since the VISEM dataset is based on human sperm samples, the authors could briefly mention the original ethical approval and cite the VISSEM source publication to clarify this point \nList of minor concerns and feedback\n\n\nReproducibility details can be improved: While the authors share code and data, it is not clear which versions of libraries and frameworks were used, and how they were applied in the analysis. Please provide a list of all software tools and libraries used, including their versions and sources. For example, "Data analysis was conducted using Python (version number) with the following open-source packages: scikit-learn (version number) for model building, PyMC (version number) for Bayesian inference, matplotlib (version number) for visualization, and pandas (version number) for data manipulation. Doing this will help validation and reuse, especially in less-resourced settings.\n\nFigures need better resolution: Some figures (e.g., 1A and 1B) appear small or low-resolution and are difficult to read without zooming in. Increasing the image resolution and adjusting layout for clarity would improve readability. Also, authors may consider removing box characters from figure legends to make their content more readable and clear.\n\nClarify limitations and generalizability: The author mentions limitations, but it would be helpful to more clearly state what the study cannot determine. Also specifying the populations from which the samples were obtained and discussing whether results might differ in other populations would improve transparency.  \n\nVisual abstract for non expert audience: Given the potential interest from a broad audience, including non-experts, reviewers suggested adding a non-technical summary of the findings—potentially in the form of a visual abstract. It may also be helpful to reflect on which other disciplinary fields could find this topic relevant.\nConcluding remarks\nOverall, Live Review participants found this to be a well-constructed study. We thank the authors of the preprint for posting their work openly for feedback. We also thank all participants of the Live Review call for their time and for engaging in the lively discussion that generated this review.\n\n    \nCompeting interests\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-10-27},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Daniela Saderi and Rosario Rogel-Salazar and Chidi Asuzu MBBS, MMCi and Toba Isaac Olatoye and Mitchell Collier},\n\tcollaborator = {Publications, JMIR},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15887836. This review is the result of a virtual, collaborative Live Review discussion organized and hosted by PREreview and JMIR Publications on June 26, 2025. The discussion was joined by 14 people: 2 facilitators from the PREreview Team, 1 member of the JMIR Publications team, 1 author, and 10 live review participants. The authors of this review have dedicated additional asynchronous time over the course of two weeks to help compose this final report using the notes from the Live Review. We thank all participants who contributed to the discussion and made it possible for us to provide feedback on this preprint. Summary This preprint presents a well-structured study that introduces the concept of \"sperm fatigue\" as a novel framework for assessing motility deterioration in human sperm. The study aims to develop and validate a new profiling method to assess infra-trajectory motility decline in human spermatozoa. Using a metric termed the \"Fatigue Index\" and data from computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) systems, the authors demonstrate that infra-trajectory motility decline is both measurable and biologically plausible, with potential links to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. This approach aids in identifying sperm with potential subclinical impairments and informs the development of predictive biomarkers for sperm functionality and male fertility evaluation. The methodology is clearly described, and the inclusion of shared code and data exemplifies strong open science practices. Below, we summarize the main points discussed during the Live Review and offer suggestions for improving the manuscript. Minor enhancements to documentation and accessibility could further support its broader application across disciplines. List of major concerns and feedback: Clarify dataset selection and segmentation process: The manuscript lacks sufficient detail regarding the selection and segmentation of video clips from the VISEM dataset. To improve transparency and reproducibility, please provide a clear explanation of how video segments were selected for analysis, including specific criteria such as duration, quality, sample characteristics, or relevance to the study's aims. Additionally, include a brief description of the origin of the VISEM dataset, emphasizing that the clips used in this study were curated from full-length videos. Please, clarify how the original dataset was constructed by its curators and how your study further selected, filtered, or modified these data. Finally, cite the original VISEM publication and relevant documentation to support clarity and reproducibility. Missing ethics statement: Although the study likely follows ethical standards, it would be best practice to include a short ethics statement. Since the VISEM dataset is based on human sperm samples, the authors could briefly mention the original ethical approval and cite the VISSEM source publication to clarify this point List of minor concerns and feedback Reproducibility details can be improved: While the authors share code and data, it is not clear which versions of libraries and frameworks were used, and how they were applied in the analysis. Please provide a list of all software tools and libraries used, including their versions and sources. For example, \"Data analysis was conducted using Python (version number) with the following open-source packages: scikit-learn (version number) for model building, PyMC (version number) for Bayesian inference, matplotlib (version number) for visualization, and pandas (version number) for data manipulation. Doing this will help validation and reuse, especially in less-resourced settings. Figures need better resolution: Some figures (e.g., 1A and 1B) appear small or low-resolution and are difficult to read without zooming in. Increasing the image resolution and adjusting layout for clarity would improve readability. Also, authors may consider removing box characters from figure legends to make their content more readable and clear. Clarify limitations and generalizability: The author mentions limitations, but it would be helpful to more clearly state what the study cannot determine. Also specifying the populations from which the samples were obtained and discussing whether results might differ in other populations would improve transparency. Visual abstract for non expert audience: Given the potential interest from a broad audience, including non-experts, reviewers suggested adding a non-technical summary of the findings—potentially in the form of a visual abstract. It may also be helpful to reflect on which other disciplinary fields could find this topic relevant. Concluding remarks Overall, Live Review participants found this to be a well-constructed study. We thank the authors of the preprint for posting their work openly for feedback. We also thank all participants of the Live Review call for their time and for engaging in the lively discussion that generated this review. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n PREreview of \"Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis\".\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Miller, J.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Akuma, I.; Dogan, G.; Li, X.; and Osadebe, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n October 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"PREreview$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{jennifer_miller_prereview_2025,\n\ttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Rewriting} the {Politics} of {Publication}: {Tracking} 25 {Years} of {Debate} in {Academic} {Reform} with {Bibliometric} {Analysis}"},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{PREreview} of "{Rewriting} the {Politics} of {Publication}},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.17290072},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.17290072},\n\tabstract = {This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17290072.\n\n\nReview of "Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis"\nDiscussion Participants (in random order): This review was the result of two live review sessions and a period of asynchronous review that included additional discussion participants Ava Chan, Mercury Shitindo, and Naaman Arodi.\nSummary\nThis preprint investigates how scholarly discourse on academic publishing reform has evolved between 2000 and 2025, focusing on three central debates: editorial gatekeeping and bias, prestige-driven research metrics, and barriers/equity in access. Using bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed literature, supplemented by thematic mapping and time-slicing around milestones such as DORA and Sci-Hub, the study provides a longitudinal overview of how debates have shifted over the last 25 years.\nStrengths\nThe preprint demonstrates several notable strengths that contribute to its value as a scholarly work. First, the research question is clearly articulated and thoughtfully framed around central debates of academic publishing reform, namely editorial gatekeeping, prestige-driven metrics, and barriers to equity in access. This clarity provides a strong foundation for the study and brings coherence to the analysis.\nSecond, the data analysis is substantial and systematically organized, with temporal slicing that allows for meaningful comparisons across key milestones such as DORA and Sci-Hub. This design choice enhances the paper's ability to capture both long-term trends and more recent developments in the field. Methodologically, the use of bibliometric tools such as the Bibliometrix package in R, multiple correspondence analysis, and thematic mapping demonstrates technical sophistication. The authors also pay careful attention to data management.\nThird, beyond technical execution, the paper engages directly with globally relevant debates about equity, access, and scholarly integrity, ensuring its relevance across disciplines and geographies.\nFinally, the writing is clear and well-structured.\nMajor Issues\nDespite its strengths, the manuscript also presents several important limitations that warrant careful attention.\nAt 57 pages, the paper is longer than most published journal articles. Even without that constraint, we found that the length contributed to a diffuse narrative. As reviewers, we considered two possible approaches to addressing this issue.\n\n\nThe first approach would be to divide the paper into multiple articles, each focusing on editorial gatekeeping, prestige metrics, or equity and access. This approach would have the advantage of allowing each paper to be addressed to a specific audience.\n\nA second option would be to focus the paper on the narrative reflected in the thematic maps, especially their motor quadrants. This is where the narrative gains traction. With this approach, you would keep only the thematic maps and the thematic evolution diagrams in the main text of the article. Use the time-sliced maps where applicable, and consider combining the two evolution diagrams into one. You would then move the rest of the figures, many of the tables, and their analysis to supplemental materials. Although that may seem drastic, shortening the paper like that would greatly increase the number of journals that would consider the paper for publication.\nWe recommend adding a designated Limitations section in which some of the following concerns can be addressed.\nA central limitation for us was the exclusive reliance on English-language literature within Scopus, which risks reproducing the very Global North and English-language bias that the study seeks to critique. We recognize that a comparative and multilingual analysis would have been a considerably more complex study. However, the absence of regional databases such as SciELO or AJOL, as well as open alternatives like OpenAlex, narrows the inclusivity of the analysis and should be more explicitly acknowledged and justified. Although Scopus indeed offers comprehensive metadata, it should be acknowledged that similar fields (e.g., citation details, bibliographic data, affiliations, and in some cases funding information) are also available in Web of Science (WoS). The claim that WoS metadata is typically restricted to authors, titles, sources, and abstracts does not reflect the full capabilities of the database. There are also other bibliometric data sources available, such as OpenAlex, an open, large-scale, and increasingly utilized alternative. Rather than framing the rationale solely as a comparison between Scopus and WoS, the authors may wish to articulate why Scopus was chosen over other possible sources and, if possible, describe how they would expect the results to be different if other databases had been included. Doing so would demonstrate a broader awareness of the expanding landscape of bibliographic databases and provide a more comprehensive justification for the methodological choice.\nIn addition, the treatment of historical milestones seems incomplete. While DORA and Sci-Hub are foregrounded, other equally significant developments, including the Leiden Manifesto, CoARA, and most notably the COVID-19 pandemic, are insufficiently integrated. This omission weakens the historical contextualization, particularly given the pandemic's profound impact on scholarly publishing, the types of research that could be conducted, preprint adoption, and debates around access. As COVID-19 was one of the keywords that was excluded or combined, this should be referenced and explained in the main text.\nRelatedly, the description of data processing should be more transparent. The processes of keyword cleaning, deduplication, and classification are not fully documented, leaving questions about justification for keyword removal and the handling of documents that span multiple thematic categories. Greater transparency, through the release of keyword dictionaries, detailed classification rules, and code, would significantly enhance reproducibility and confidence in the findings.\nConcerns also arise in the interpretation of the multiple components analysis (MCA). In some instances, the first two dimensions explain less than 11\\% of the variance, raising doubts about the robustness of the clusters presented. Without additional evidence, such as reporting cumulative variance across more dimensions or validating clusters through alternative methods, the interpretive strength of these analyses remains limited. In the thematic maps, it would be helpful to look at the clusters in the emerging / declining quadrants at a more granular level and to clearly identify each one as either emerging or declining. As a reader, not knowing the direction of change distracts from the clarity of the narrative.\nFinally, the paper is largely descriptive, while its title, "Rewriting the Politics" can be read as promising a more robust critique. A more precise framing such as "Tracing 25 Years of Debate" or "Mapping the Politics of Publication" may better capture the scope of the work. To the extent practical, engaging with theory in the Discussion section would add depth to the interpretation of your findings on the equity debates. Some relevant schools of thought to consider would be feminist theory, Bourdieu's field theory, and decolonial and Global South epistemologies.\nMinor Issues\nIn addition to these major concerns, there are some minor issues that, if addressed, would improve the readability, accessibility, and overall coherence of the manuscript.\nWith respect to tables and figures, our main recommendation is that as many as possible be moved to supplemental materials, especially if you are seeking publication at a journal that prints hard copies. Colour printing is especially costly, so it would be helpful to adapt any figures that will remain in the main text for high-resolution black-and-white reproduction. Providing interactive versions of figures online would be another option to consider. The current captions have the advantage of being consistent across each debate. However, you may want to revise captions to help each figure stand on its own to the extent practical, including by spelling out abbreviations. An option to make the figures easier to interpret, especially in black and white, would be to number the identified clusters.\nMiscellaneous Remarks\nThere are also some broader considerations that would enhance the overall impact and relevance of the manuscript.\n\n\nThe discussion would be more compelling if bibliometric patterns were more explicitly linked to policy outcomes, for instance, how trends in editorial control or research metrics have influenced funding distribution, institutional evaluation systems, or open access mandates.\n\nThe Conclusion could be strengthened by situating the findings more clearly within current policy contexts, which have changed significantly even since this research was conducted. Acknowledging recent U.S. policy shifts that restrict equity-driven research, such as the 2025 NSF directives, would underline the continued political stakes of debates in academic publishing and make the study resonate more strongly with present-day developments.\nContext and Contribution\nThe preprint is a valuable and timely contribution to scholarship on publishing reform, offering a long-term bibliometric mapping of critical debates. It is especially timely in that 2025 is likely to represent another major shift. The study's novelty lies in synthesizing 25 years of discourse and situating them against reform milestones. We believe that this paper contains the makings of at least one paper that we would recommend for publication. As a newly formed PREreview Club, we found it especially motivating to find in the paper's conclusions "the persistence of identity-based and structural bias necessitates a reformation from 'Gatekeeper' to 'Mentor'" (p. 48) and "all scholars were once learners who benefited from the patience and guidance of their predecessors; extending the same generosity to future researchers aligns with the very nature of academia as a community devoted to teaching and learning" (p. 49).\nAcronyms\nCoARA - The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment\nDORA - Digital Operational Resilience Act\nAJOL - African Journals Online\nSciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online\nNSF - National Science Foundation\nConflict of Interest\nNo conflicts of interest were identified.\nOther\nThis review represents the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of Future of Research Evaluation and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) as an organization.\n\n    \nCompeting interests\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\n\n    \nUse of Artificial Intelligence (AI)\n\n    \nThe authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-10-27},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Jennifer Miller and Rosario Rogel-Salazar and Ifeanyichukwu Akuma and Guleda Dogan and Xiuqi Li and Ngozi Osadebe},\n\tcollaborator = {e-Scholarship (FORCE11), Future of Research Communication and},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17290072. Review of \"Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis\" Discussion Participants (in random order): This review was the result of two live review sessions and a period of asynchronous review that included additional discussion participants Ava Chan, Mercury Shitindo, and Naaman Arodi. Summary This preprint investigates how scholarly discourse on academic publishing reform has evolved between 2000 and 2025, focusing on three central debates: editorial gatekeeping and bias, prestige-driven research metrics, and barriers/equity in access. Using bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed literature, supplemented by thematic mapping and time-slicing around milestones such as DORA and Sci-Hub, the study provides a longitudinal overview of how debates have shifted over the last 25 years. Strengths The preprint demonstrates several notable strengths that contribute to its value as a scholarly work. First, the research question is clearly articulated and thoughtfully framed around central debates of academic publishing reform, namely editorial gatekeeping, prestige-driven metrics, and barriers to equity in access. This clarity provides a strong foundation for the study and brings coherence to the analysis. Second, the data analysis is substantial and systematically organized, with temporal slicing that allows for meaningful comparisons across key milestones such as DORA and Sci-Hub. This design choice enhances the paper's ability to capture both long-term trends and more recent developments in the field. Methodologically, the use of bibliometric tools such as the Bibliometrix package in R, multiple correspondence analysis, and thematic mapping demonstrates technical sophistication. The authors also pay careful attention to data management. Third, beyond technical execution, the paper engages directly with globally relevant debates about equity, access, and scholarly integrity, ensuring its relevance across disciplines and geographies. Finally, the writing is clear and well-structured. Major Issues Despite its strengths, the manuscript also presents several important limitations that warrant careful attention. At 57 pages, the paper is longer than most published journal articles. Even without that constraint, we found that the length contributed to a diffuse narrative. As reviewers, we considered two possible approaches to addressing this issue. The first approach would be to divide the paper into multiple articles, each focusing on editorial gatekeeping, prestige metrics, or equity and access. This approach would have the advantage of allowing each paper to be addressed to a specific audience. A second option would be to focus the paper on the narrative reflected in the thematic maps, especially their motor quadrants. This is where the narrative gains traction. With this approach, you would keep only the thematic maps and the thematic evolution diagrams in the main text of the article. Use the time-sliced maps where applicable, and consider combining the two evolution diagrams into one. You would then move the rest of the figures, many of the tables, and their analysis to supplemental materials. Although that may seem drastic, shortening the paper like that would greatly increase the number of journals that would consider the paper for publication. We recommend adding a designated Limitations section in which some of the following concerns can be addressed. A central limitation for us was the exclusive reliance on English-language literature within Scopus, which risks reproducing the very Global North and English-language bias that the study seeks to critique. We recognize that a comparative and multilingual analysis would have been a considerably more complex study. However, the absence of regional databases such as SciELO or AJOL, as well as open alternatives like OpenAlex, narrows the inclusivity of the analysis and should be more explicitly acknowledged and justified. Although Scopus indeed offers comprehensive metadata, it should be acknowledged that similar fields (e.g., citation details, bibliographic data, affiliations, and in some cases funding information) are also available in Web of Science (WoS). The claim that WoS metadata is typically restricted to authors, titles, sources, and abstracts does not reflect the full capabilities of the database. There are also other bibliometric data sources available, such as OpenAlex, an open, large-scale, and increasingly utilized alternative. Rather than framing the rationale solely as a comparison between Scopus and WoS, the authors may wish to articulate why Scopus was chosen over other possible sources and, if possible, describe how they would expect the results to be different if other databases had been included. Doing so would demonstrate a broader awareness of the expanding landscape of bibliographic databases and provide a more comprehensive justification for the methodological choice. In addition, the treatment of historical milestones seems incomplete. While DORA and Sci-Hub are foregrounded, other equally significant developments, including the Leiden Manifesto, CoARA, and most notably the COVID-19 pandemic, are insufficiently integrated. This omission weakens the historical contextualization, particularly given the pandemic's profound impact on scholarly publishing, the types of research that could be conducted, preprint adoption, and debates around access. As COVID-19 was one of the keywords that was excluded or combined, this should be referenced and explained in the main text. Relatedly, the description of data processing should be more transparent. The processes of keyword cleaning, deduplication, and classification are not fully documented, leaving questions about justification for keyword removal and the handling of documents that span multiple thematic categories. Greater transparency, through the release of keyword dictionaries, detailed classification rules, and code, would significantly enhance reproducibility and confidence in the findings. Concerns also arise in the interpretation of the multiple components analysis (MCA). In some instances, the first two dimensions explain less than 11% of the variance, raising doubts about the robustness of the clusters presented. Without additional evidence, such as reporting cumulative variance across more dimensions or validating clusters through alternative methods, the interpretive strength of these analyses remains limited. In the thematic maps, it would be helpful to look at the clusters in the emerging / declining quadrants at a more granular level and to clearly identify each one as either emerging or declining. As a reader, not knowing the direction of change distracts from the clarity of the narrative. Finally, the paper is largely descriptive, while its title, \"Rewriting the Politics\" can be read as promising a more robust critique. A more precise framing such as \"Tracing 25 Years of Debate\" or \"Mapping the Politics of Publication\" may better capture the scope of the work. To the extent practical, engaging with theory in the Discussion section would add depth to the interpretation of your findings on the equity debates. Some relevant schools of thought to consider would be feminist theory, Bourdieu's field theory, and decolonial and Global South epistemologies. Minor Issues In addition to these major concerns, there are some minor issues that, if addressed, would improve the readability, accessibility, and overall coherence of the manuscript. With respect to tables and figures, our main recommendation is that as many as possible be moved to supplemental materials, especially if you are seeking publication at a journal that prints hard copies. Colour printing is especially costly, so it would be helpful to adapt any figures that will remain in the main text for high-resolution black-and-white reproduction. Providing interactive versions of figures online would be another option to consider. The current captions have the advantage of being consistent across each debate. However, you may want to revise captions to help each figure stand on its own to the extent practical, including by spelling out abbreviations. An option to make the figures easier to interpret, especially in black and white, would be to number the identified clusters. Miscellaneous Remarks There are also some broader considerations that would enhance the overall impact and relevance of the manuscript. The discussion would be more compelling if bibliometric patterns were more explicitly linked to policy outcomes, for instance, how trends in editorial control or research metrics have influenced funding distribution, institutional evaluation systems, or open access mandates. The Conclusion could be strengthened by situating the findings more clearly within current policy contexts, which have changed significantly even since this research was conducted. Acknowledging recent U.S. policy shifts that restrict equity-driven research, such as the 2025 NSF directives, would underline the continued political stakes of debates in academic publishing and make the study resonate more strongly with present-day developments. Context and Contribution The preprint is a valuable and timely contribution to scholarship on publishing reform, offering a long-term bibliometric mapping of critical debates. It is especially timely in that 2025 is likely to represent another major shift. The study's novelty lies in synthesizing 25 years of discourse and situating them against reform milestones. We believe that this paper contains the makings of at least one paper that we would recommend for publication. As a newly formed PREreview Club, we found it especially motivating to find in the paper's conclusions \"the persistence of identity-based and structural bias necessitates a reformation from 'Gatekeeper' to 'Mentor'\" (p. 48) and \"all scholars were once learners who benefited from the patience and guidance of their predecessors; extending the same generosity to future researchers aligns with the very nature of academia as a community devoted to teaching and learning\" (p. 49). Acronyms CoARA - The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment DORA - Digital Operational Resilience Act AJOL - African Journals Online SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online NSF - National Science Foundation Conflict of Interest No conflicts of interest were identified. Other This review represents the opinions of the authors and does not represent the position of Future of Research Evaluation and e-Scholarship (FORCE11) as an organization. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Uma mirada no desenvolvimento regional desde o Movimento Zapatista (México).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Vargas, D. B.; Theis, I. M.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n PerCursos, 26: e0308. October 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Uma$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{vargas_uma_2025,\n\ttitle = {Uma mirada no desenvolvimento regional desde o {Movimento} {Zapatista} ({México})},\n\tvolume = {26},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1984-7246},\n\turl = {https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/percursos/article/view/26876},\n\tdoi = {10.5965/19847246262025e0308},\n\tabstract = {O desenvolvimento regional enquanto um campo de estudo tem sido reconhecido como fato (dimensão positiva) e como estratégia (dimensão normativa), cujos caminhos propositivos divergem entre si, incorporando as funções de regulação do Mercado e/ou admitindo a atuação do Estado. O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a autonomia revelada pelo Movimento Zapatista (México) a partir de algumas de suas práticas de autodeterminação social. Na análise das informações destaca-se o uso da documentação indireta como o método bibliográfico-documental privilegiado na revisão da literatura e de documentos. Os resultados revelam que uma possibilidade quanto à permanente criação de disparidades regionais estaria organizada a partir do reconhecimento da autonomia por parte dos próprios movimentos sociais. Passados 30 anos da sua constituição, a autonomia incitada no Estado de Chiapas desde o Movimento Zapatista reconstrói-se permanentemente por meio de uma estrutura de hierárquica integrada e participativa, abrindo espaço para novas autonomias, após anos de amadurecimento, acertos, erros, construção e consolidação.},\n\turldate = {2025-10-20},\n\tjournal = {PerCursos},\n\tauthor = {Vargas, Diego Boehlke and Theis, Ivo Marcos and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tpages = {e0308},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ameaça velada ao acesso aberto diamante: quando os indicadores se tornam armas de exclusão.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Silveira, L. D.; Ribeiro, N. C.; Salas, D.; Penabad-Camacho, L.; Córdoba González, S.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Espinoza De Los Monteros, M. A. T.; Abedrapo Rosen, I.; Polanco-Cortés, J.; Ruz Fuenzalida, C.; Fachin, J.; Santillan-Aldana, J.; Vidal Silva, R.; Sánchez Islas, L. A.; Oddone, N.; Sena, P. M. B.; Silva-Garcés, F.; Brumatti, J. D.; and Araújo, K. M. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciência da Informação Express, 6: 1–12. July 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Ameaça$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 4 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{silveira_ameacvelada_2025,\n\ttitle = {Ameaça velada ao acesso aberto diamante: quando os indicadores se tornam armas de exclusão},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2675-8717},\n\tshorttitle = {Ameaça velada ao acesso aberto diamante},\n\turl = {https://cienciadainformacaoexpress.ufla.br/index.php/revista/article/view/152},\n\tdoi = {10.60144/v6i.2025.152},\n\tabstract = {Neste artigo apresenta-se uma análise crítica sobre a recente mudança metodológica do SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) que passou a estimar cobranças por processamento de artigos (APC), inclusive em revistas que operam sob o modelo diamante. Essa prática, que associa métricas de citação à suposta qualidade editorial, reforça um sistema de avaliação elitista e mercantilizado, colocando em risco a sustentabilidade de modelos colaborativos e não comerciais de comunicação científica, especialmente no Sul Global. Com base em uma revisão de estudos recentes e em declarações internacionais, as autoras e autores alertam para os perigos da mercantilização dos indicadores e propõem ações urgentes para proteger a integridade do modelo diamante. Entre as propostas estão: a visibilização explícita de revistas sem APC, o fortalecimento de infraestruturas públicas e a adoção de métricas mais justas e representativas do valor social da ciência. Conclui-se que confundir qualidade científica com capacidade de pagamento perpetua desigualdades estruturais incompatíveis com os princípios da ciência aberta.\n          , \n            This article presents a critical analysis of the recent methodological change implemented by the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which has begun estimating article processing charges (APCs) even for journals operating under the diamond open access model. This practice, which links citation metrics to presumed editorial quality, reinforces an elitist and market-driven evaluation system, threatening the sustainability of collaborative and non-commercial models of scholarly communication, particularly in the Global South. Based on a review of recent studies and international declarations, the authors denounce the dangers of indicator commodification and propose urgent actions to safeguard the integrity of the diamond model. These include the explicit visibility of journals without APCs, the strengthening of public infrastructures, and the adoption of fairer metrics that better reflect the social value of science. The article concludes that equating scientific quality with the ability to pay perpetuates structural inequalities that are incompatible with the principles of open science.\n          , \n            Este artículo presenta un análisis crítico sobre el reciente cambio metodológico del SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), que ha comenzado a estimar cargos por procesamiento de artículos (APC) incluso en revistas que operan bajo el modelo diamante. Esta práctica, que vincula métricas de citación con supuesta calidad editorial, refuerza un sistema de evaluación elitista y mercantilizado, poniendo en riesgo la sostenibilidad de modelos colaborativos y no comerciales de comunicación científica, especialmente en el Sur Global. A partir de una revisión de estudios recientes y declaraciones internacionales, las autoras y autores denuncian los peligros de la mercantilización de los indicadores y proponen acciones urgentes para proteger la integridad del modelo diamante. Entre las propuestas se incluyen la visibilización explícita de revistas sin APC, el fortalecimiento de infraestructuras públicas y la adopción de métricas más justas y representativas del valor social de la ciencia. Se concluye que confundir calidad científica con capacidad de pago perpetúa desigualdades estructurales incompatibles con los principios de la ciencia abierta.},\n\turldate = {2025-08-05},\n\tjournal = {Ciência da Informação Express},\n\tauthor = {Silveira, Lucia Da and Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto and Salas, Dagoberto and Penabad-Camacho, Liana and Córdoba González, Saray and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Espinoza De Los Monteros, Martin Adalberto Tena and Abedrapo Rosen, Isabel and Polanco-Cortés, Jorge and Ruz Fuenzalida, Carlos and Fachin, Juliana and Santillan-Aldana, Julio and Vidal Silva, Rinaldo and Sánchez Islas, Liliana Andrea and Oddone, Nanci and Sena, Priscila Machado Borges and Silva-Garcés, Francisco and Brumatti, Josimara Dias and Araújo, Kizi Mendonça De},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tpages = {1--12},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n Neste artigo apresenta-se uma análise crítica sobre a recente mudança metodológica do SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) que passou a estimar cobranças por processamento de artigos (APC), inclusive em revistas que operam sob o modelo diamante. Essa prática, que associa métricas de citação à suposta qualidade editorial, reforça um sistema de avaliação elitista e mercantilizado, colocando em risco a sustentabilidade de modelos colaborativos e não comerciais de comunicação científica, especialmente no Sul Global. Com base em uma revisão de estudos recentes e em declarações internacionais, as autoras e autores alertam para os perigos da mercantilização dos indicadores e propõem ações urgentes para proteger a integridade do modelo diamante. Entre as propostas estão: a visibilização explícita de revistas sem APC, o fortalecimento de infraestruturas públicas e a adoção de métricas mais justas e representativas do valor social da ciência. Conclui-se que confundir qualidade científica com capacidade de pagamento perpetua desigualdades estruturais incompatíveis com os princípios da ciência aberta. , This article presents a critical analysis of the recent methodological change implemented by the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which has begun estimating article processing charges (APCs) even for journals operating under the diamond open access model. This practice, which links citation metrics to presumed editorial quality, reinforces an elitist and market-driven evaluation system, threatening the sustainability of collaborative and non-commercial models of scholarly communication, particularly in the Global South. Based on a review of recent studies and international declarations, the authors denounce the dangers of indicator commodification and propose urgent actions to safeguard the integrity of the diamond model. These include the explicit visibility of journals without APCs, the strengthening of public infrastructures, and the adoption of fairer metrics that better reflect the social value of science. The article concludes that equating scientific quality with the ability to pay perpetuates structural inequalities that are incompatible with the principles of open science. , Este artículo presenta un análisis crítico sobre el reciente cambio metodológico del SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), que ha comenzado a estimar cargos por procesamiento de artículos (APC) incluso en revistas que operan bajo el modelo diamante. Esta práctica, que vincula métricas de citación con supuesta calidad editorial, refuerza un sistema de evaluación elitista y mercantilizado, poniendo en riesgo la sostenibilidad de modelos colaborativos y no comerciales de comunicación científica, especialmente en el Sur Global. A partir de una revisión de estudios recientes y declaraciones internacionales, las autoras y autores denuncian los peligros de la mercantilización de los indicadores y proponen acciones urgentes para proteger la integridad del modelo diamante. Entre las propuestas se incluyen la visibilización explícita de revistas sin APC, el fortalecimiento de infraestructuras públicas y la adopción de métricas más justas y representativas del valor social de la ciencia. Se concluye que confundir calidad científica con capacidad de pago perpetúa desigualdades estructurales incompatibles con los principios de la ciencia abierta.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Documenting Traces of Latin American Feminist Movements: Digital Counterarchives as Sites of Memory and Resistance.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel‐Salazar, R.; Colín‐Arce, A.; García‐Monroy, A.; Benítez‐Pérez, V.; and Contreras‐Fuentes, D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Sexuality, Gender & Policy, 8(2): e70006. May 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Documenting$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogelsalazar_documenting_2025,\n\ttitle = {Documenting {Traces} of {Latin} {American} {Feminist} {Movements}: {Digital} {Counterarchives} as {Sites} of {Memory} and {Resistance}},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2639-5355, 2639-5355},\n\tshorttitle = {Documenting {Traces} of {Latin} {American} {Feminist} {Movements}},\n\turl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sgp2.70006},\n\tdoi = {10.1002/sgp2.70006},\n\tabstract = {ABSTRACT\n            \n              Introduction\n              Traces of protests from Latin American feminist movements (such as signs, feminist graffiti, etc.) tend to disappear quickly, both because these protest expressions are ephemeral and because institutions erase these traces before they can be documented and preserved. This erasure is a policy decision because it removes women's demands from the public space.\n            \n            \n              Methods\n              \n                In this paper, we explain two approaches for documenting traces of Latin American feminist movements of the 2020s to prevent this erasure and address their ephemerality: one through a local digital counterarchive for a mid‐sized Mexican city (titled\n                Huellas Incómodas\n                ) and another through a regional web counterarchive (titled Feminist Activisms in Latin America).\n              \n            \n            \n              Results\n              \n                Counterarchives are needed because they are sources to record, highlight, and legitimize women's knowledge and demands and because memory institutions lack policies on how to document and preserve feminist protests. Building digital counterarchives can resist this erasure of women's demands and unrest by documenting and preserving these protest traces, which we call\n                Huellas Incómodas\n                (uncomfortable footprints) because they expose the inaction of institutions to address gender‐based violence.\n              \n            \n            \n              Conclusion\n              \n                By constructing digital counterarchives, the erasure of women's demands and unrest can be resisted through the documentation and preservation of these protest traces. Termed\n                Huellas Incómodas\n                to underscore the inaction of institutions in addressing gender‐based violence, these counterarchives play a vital role in amplifying women's voices and demanding change.\n              \n            \n          , \n            摘要\n            \n              简介\n              拉丁美洲女权运动的抗议痕迹 (如标语、女权涂鸦等)往往会很快消失, 这既是因为这些抗议表达是短暂的, 也是因为机构会在这些痕迹被记录和保存之前就将其抹去。这种抹去是一种政策决定, 因为它将女性的要求从公共空间中移除。\n            \n            \n              方法\n              本文中, 我们解释了两种用于记录2020年代拉丁美洲女权运动痕迹的方法, 以防止其被抹去并解决其短暂性问题:一种方法是通过一个中等规模的墨西哥城市的本地数字反档案 (名为Huellas Incómodas), 另一种方法是通过一个区域网络反档案 (名为拉丁美洲的女权主义活动)。\n            \n            \n              结果\n              需要反档案, 因为它们是记录、强调和合法化女性知识和需求的来源, 并且因为记忆机构缺乏关于如何记录和保存女权主义抗议的政策。通过记录和保存这些抗议痕迹, 我们称之为Huellas Incómoda (令人不安的足迹), 数字反档案能抵制对“女性要求和骚乱”的抹除, 因为它们揭露了机构在解决性别暴力问题上的不作为。\n            \n            \n              结论\n              通过构建数字反档案, 则能通过记录和保存这些抗议痕迹, 以抵制对“女性要求和骚乱”的抹除。这些反档案被称为Huellas Incómodas, 强调了机构在解决性别暴力问题上的不作为, 并且在“扩大女性的发声和要求变革”方面发挥着至关重要的作用。\n            \n          , \n            Resumen\n            \n              Introducción\n              Los rastros de las protestas de los movimientos feministas latinoamericanos (como carteles, grafitis feministas, etc.) tienden a desaparecer rápidamente, tanto por su carácter efímero como por la rápida desaparición de estas expresiones de protesta, que se produce antes de que las instituciones las documenten y preserven. Esta eliminación es una decisión política, ya que elimina del espacio público las peticiones de las mujeres.\n            \n            \n              Métodos\n              En este artículo, explicamos dos enfoques para documentar los rastros de los movimientos feministas latinoamericanos de la década de 2020 para prevenir este borrado y abordar su efímera naturaleza: uno a través de un contraarchivo digital local para una ciudad mexicana de tamaño medio (titulado Huellas Incómodas) y otro a través de un contraarchivo web regional (titulado Activismos feministas en América Latina).\n            \n            \n              Resultados\n              Los contraarchivos son necesarios porque son fuentes para registrar, visibilizar y legitimar el conocimiento y las demandas de las mujeres, y porque las instituciones de la memoria carecen de políticas para documentar y preservar las protestas feministas. La creación de contraarchivos digitales puede contrarrestar esta supresión de las peticiones y el malestar de las mujeres al documentar y preservar estas huellas de protesta, que llamamos Huellas Incómodas, ya que exponen la inacción de las instituciones para abordar la violencia de género.\n            \n            \n              Conclusión\n              Mediante la construcción de contraarchivos digitales, se puede resistir la supresión de las peticiones y el malestar de las mujeres mediante la documentación y preservación de estas huellas de protesta. Con el nombre de "Huellas Incómodas" para subrayar la inacción de las instituciones al abordar la violencia de género, estos contraarchivos desempeñan un papel vital para amplificar las voces de las mujeres y exigir cambios.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-04-14},\n\tjournal = {Sexuality, Gender \\& Policy},\n\tauthor = {Rogel‐Salazar, Rosario and Colín‐Arce, Alan and García‐Monroy, Abraham and Benítez‐Pérez, Verónica and Contreras‐Fuentes, Dany},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tpages = {e70006},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n ABSTRACT Introduction Traces of protests from Latin American feminist movements (such as signs, feminist graffiti, etc.) tend to disappear quickly, both because these protest expressions are ephemeral and because institutions erase these traces before they can be documented and preserved. This erasure is a policy decision because it removes women's demands from the public space. Methods In this paper, we explain two approaches for documenting traces of Latin American feminist movements of the 2020s to prevent this erasure and address their ephemerality: one through a local digital counterarchive for a mid‐sized Mexican city (titled Huellas Incómodas ) and another through a regional web counterarchive (titled Feminist Activisms in Latin America). Results Counterarchives are needed because they are sources to record, highlight, and legitimize women's knowledge and demands and because memory institutions lack policies on how to document and preserve feminist protests. Building digital counterarchives can resist this erasure of women's demands and unrest by documenting and preserving these protest traces, which we call Huellas Incómodas (uncomfortable footprints) because they expose the inaction of institutions to address gender‐based violence. Conclusion By constructing digital counterarchives, the erasure of women's demands and unrest can be resisted through the documentation and preservation of these protest traces. Termed Huellas Incómodas to underscore the inaction of institutions in addressing gender‐based violence, these counterarchives play a vital role in amplifying women's voices and demanding change. , 摘要简介拉丁美洲女权运动的抗议痕迹 (如标语、女权涂鸦等)往往会很快消失, 这既是因为这些抗议表达是短暂的, 也是因为机构会在这些痕迹被记录和保存之前就将其抹去。这种抹去是一种政策决定, 因为它将女性的要求从公共空间中移除。方法本文中, 我们解释了两种用于记录2020年代拉丁美洲女权运动痕迹的方法, 以防止其被抹去并解决其短暂性问题:一种方法是通过一个中等规模的墨西哥城市的本地数字反档案 (名为Huellas Incómodas), 另一种方法是通过一个区域网络反档案 (名为拉丁美洲的女权主义活动)。结果需要反档案, 因为它们是记录、强调和合法化女性知识和需求的来源, 并且因为记忆机构缺乏关于如何记录和保存女权主义抗议的政策。通过记录和保存这些抗议痕迹, 我们称之为Huellas Incómoda (令人不安的足迹), 数字反档案能抵制对“女性要求和骚乱”的抹除, 因为它们揭露了机构在解决性别暴力问题上的不作为。结论通过构建数字反档案, 则能通过记录和保存这些抗议痕迹, 以抵制对“女性要求和骚乱”的抹除。这些反档案被称为Huellas Incómodas, 强调了机构在解决性别暴力问题上的不作为, 并且在“扩大女性的发声和要求变革”方面发挥着至关重要的作用。 , Resumen Introducción Los rastros de las protestas de los movimientos feministas latinoamericanos (como carteles, grafitis feministas, etc.) tienden a desaparecer rápidamente, tanto por su carácter efímero como por la rápida desaparición de estas expresiones de protesta, que se produce antes de que las instituciones las documenten y preserven. Esta eliminación es una decisión política, ya que elimina del espacio público las peticiones de las mujeres. Métodos En este artículo, explicamos dos enfoques para documentar los rastros de los movimientos feministas latinoamericanos de la década de 2020 para prevenir este borrado y abordar su efímera naturaleza: uno a través de un contraarchivo digital local para una ciudad mexicana de tamaño medio (titulado Huellas Incómodas) y otro a través de un contraarchivo web regional (titulado Activismos feministas en América Latina). Resultados Los contraarchivos son necesarios porque son fuentes para registrar, visibilizar y legitimar el conocimiento y las demandas de las mujeres, y porque las instituciones de la memoria carecen de políticas para documentar y preservar las protestas feministas. La creación de contraarchivos digitales puede contrarrestar esta supresión de las peticiones y el malestar de las mujeres al documentar y preservar estas huellas de protesta, que llamamos Huellas Incómodas, ya que exponen la inacción de las instituciones para abordar la violencia de género. Conclusión Mediante la construcción de contraarchivos digitales, se puede resistir la supresión de las peticiones y el malestar de las mujeres mediante la documentación y preservación de estas huellas de protesta. Con el nombre de \"Huellas Incómodas\" para subrayar la inacción de las instituciones al abordar la violencia de género, estos contraarchivos desempeñan un papel vital para amplificar las voces de las mujeres y exigir cambios.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Evaluación académica transparente: El impacto del Acceso Abierto en las prácticas de integridad científica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n March 2025.\n Artwork Size: 89096486 Bytes Pages: 89096486 Bytes\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Evaluación$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_evaluacion_2025,\n\taddress = {México},\n\ttype = {Seminario {Permanente}},\n\ttitle = {Evaluación académica transparente: {El} impacto del {Acceso} {Abierto} en las prácticas de integridad científica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Evaluación académica transparente},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Evaluaci_n_acad_mica_transparente_El_impacto_del_Acceso_Abierto_en_las_pr_cticas_de_integridad_cient_fica_conferencia_on_line_organizada_por_PUB_Programa_Universitario_de_Bio_tica_UNAM_M_xico_20_de_marzo_/28636223},\n\tabstract = {La conferencia analiza retos éticos clave en la comunicación científica contemporánea, enfatizando la importancia de la integridad académica en el contexto del acceso abierto y la ciencia abierta. Se destacan amenazas específicas, como publicaciones y congresos predadores, revistas clonadas y riesgos derivados de acuerdos transformativos que aumentan costos y exclusión institucional. Además, aborda desafíos éticos del manejo de datos sensibles y subraya la necesidad de mejorar la calidad e interoperabilidad de los metadatos. Finalmente, propone recomendaciones concretas que incluyen estándares abiertos, infraestructura digital robusta, capacitación especializada, políticas institucionales claras y prácticas transparentes que aseguren una evaluación científica justa y responsable.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2025-03-21},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tnote = {Artwork Size: 89096486 Bytes\nPages: 89096486 Bytes},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Controversias en Publicaciones Científicas: El Caso MDPI.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2025.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Controversias$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_controversias_2025,\n\ttype = {Académica},\n\ttitle = {Controversias en {Publicaciones} {Científicas}: {El} {Caso} {MDPI}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Boletín {SciELO}-{México}},\n\turl = {https://boletinscielomx.blogspot.com/2025/01/controversias-en-publicaciones.html},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2025-01-31},\n\tjournal = {Boletín SciELO-México},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2025},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2024\n \n \n (5)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Impulsando la divulgación científica a través de la Inteligencia Artificial: Un estudio comparativo en la UAEMéx y la UAEM.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sánchez-Adaya Lorena; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Zamora, N., editor(s), Comunicación de la Ciencia y Educación, pages 42–58. RIA Editorial, São Paulo, 1a edition, October 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Impulsando$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{sanchez-adaya_lorena_impulsando_2024,\n\taddress = {São Paulo},\n\tedition = {1a},\n\ttitle = {Impulsando la divulgación científica a través de la {Inteligencia} {Artificial}: {Un} estudio comparativo en la {UAEMéx} y la {UAEM}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-989-9220-06-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Impulsando la divulgación científica a través de la {Inteligencia} {Artificial}},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13937275},\n\tabstract = {Este estudio tiene como objetivo examinar cómo la integración de la inteligencia artificial (IA), las ciencias sociales computacionales y las humanidades digitales pueden revitalizar los programas de divulgación científica en la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM) y la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex). A través de un enfoque metodológico mixto, incluyendo análisis de contenido y entrevistas semiestructuradas, este proyecto busca identificar oportunidades y desafíos para una comunicación científica más efectiva y accesible. Los hallazgos anticipan un avance conceptual significativo y proponen un marco para la adopción estratégica de tecnologías digitales en la divulgación de la ciencia.\n\n\\_\\_\\_\n\nThis study aims to examine how the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), computational social science and digital humanities can revitalize science outreach programs at Autonomous University of the State of Morelos (UAEM) and the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (UAEMex). Through a mixed methodological approach, including content analysis and semi-structured interviews, this project seeks to identify opportunities and challenges for more effective and accessible science communication. The findings anticipate a significant conceptual breakthrough and propose a framework for the strategic adoption of digital technologies in science outreach.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2024-10-15},\n\tbooktitle = {Comunicación de la {Ciencia} y {Educación}},\n\tpublisher = {RIA Editorial},\n\tauthor = {{Sánchez-Adaya Lorena} and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Navarro Zamora},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.13937275},\n\tpages = {42--58},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Perspectiva de ciencia abierta en el desarrollo de smart cities en América Latina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bahía Blanca, October 2024. Zenodo\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Perspectiva$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_perspectiva_2024,\n\taddress = {Bahía Blanca},\n\ttitle = {Perspectiva de ciencia abierta en el desarrollo de smart cities en {América} {Latina}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13942430},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.13942430},\n\tabstract = {Analizar algunos de los temas poco abordados en el desarrollo y análisis de las smart cities en América Latina, incorporando una perspectiva de Ciencia Abierta que se enfoque en la inclusión, transparencia, y colaboración abierta.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2024-11-07},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n O Movimento Zapatista (México) enquanto uma perspectiva para se pensar desenvolvimento regional.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n B. Vargas, D.; Theis, I. M.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bahía Blanca, October 2024. Zenodo\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"O$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{b._vargas_o_2024,\n\taddress = {Bahía Blanca},\n\ttitle = {O {Movimento} {Zapatista} ({México}) enquanto uma perspectiva para se pensar desenvolvimento regional},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13942152},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/ZENODO.13942152},\n\tabstract = {O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a autonomia revelada pelo Movimento Zapatista (México). Especificamente, procura vislumbrar um caminho que entenda a superação das condições materiais como relevante para a evitar a (re)criação das disparidades regionais por meio da autodeterminação social de cada comunidade regional.},\n\tlanguage = {pt},\n\turldate = {2024-11-07},\n\tpublisher = {Zenodo},\n\tauthor = {B. Vargas, Diego and Theis, Ivo M. and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Zotero: Gestiona y optimiza la bibliografía para tu tesis doctoral (primera parte).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rosario Rogel-Salazar\n\n\n \n\n\n\n April 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Zotero:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rosario_rogel-salazar_zotero:_2024,\n\taddress = {México},\n\ttitle = {Zotero: {Gestiona} y optimiza la bibliografía para tu tesis doctoral (primera parte)},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Zotero},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87sW4qyewxo},\n\tabstract = {Licencia Atribución de Creative Commons (reutilización permitida)},\n\turldate = {2024-10-06},\n\tauthor = {{Rosario Rogel-Salazar}},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n WeberWeb: Creation of an OER on Sociological Theory in Collaboration with Undergraduate Students.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Colín-Arce, A.; and Rosenblum, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n IDEAH, 4(2). March 2024.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"WeberWeb:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_weberweb:_2024,\n\ttitle = {{WeberWeb}: {Creation} of an {OER} on {Sociological} {Theory} in {Collaboration} with {Undergraduate} {Students}},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{WeberWeb}},\n\turl = {https://ideah.pubpub.org/pub/tk0eqm4u/release/3},\n\tdoi = {10.21428/f1f23564.dd691d36},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-05-09},\n\tjournal = {IDEAH},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Colín-Arce, Alan and Rosenblum, Brian},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2024},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2023\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Web Archiving en español: Barriers to Accessing and Using Web Archives in Latin America.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Colin-Arce, A.; Fernandez, S.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Benítez-Pérez, V.; and García, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 2023. IIPC\n https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2143928/\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Web$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{colin-arce_web_2023,\n\ttitle = {Web {Archiving} en español: {Barriers} to {Accessing} and {Using} {Web} {Archives} in {Latin} {America}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Web {Archiving} en español},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Web_Archiving_en_espa_ol_Barriers_to_Accessing_and_Using_Web_Archives_in_Latin_America/22271041/1},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.22271041.V1},\n\tabstract = {Web archives have been growing in popularity in Global North countries as a way of preserving a part of their political, cultural, and social life carried out online. However, its spread to other regions has been slower because of several technical, economic, and social barriers. In this presentation, we discuss the main limitations in the uptake of web archiving in Spanish-speaking Latin American countries and its implications for the access and use of web archives. The first barrier to web archiving in these countries is the lack of awareness of web archives among librarians and archivists. According to Scopus data from 2022, out of 909 documents with the words “web archiv*” on the title, abstract, or keywords, 10 papers are from Spanish-Speaking Latin American countries. In worldwide web archiving surveys, there are no initiatives from Latin America yet (D. Gomes et al., 2011; P. Gomes, 2020), and we could only identify 5 Latin American institutions on Archive-It, none of which had active public collections in 2022. Another barrier is the cost of web archiving services like Archive-It, which can be unaffordable for many institutions in the region. Even if they can afford these services or use free tools, most web archiving software is created only in English and it does not smoothly support multilingual collections or collections in languages other than English (for example, the default metadata fields for collections and seeds are in English and adding them in other languages is not straightforward). This unequal access to web archives between the Global North and South comes with the risk that Global North websites get preserved, organized, accessed, and used, while Latin America and other regions continue depending solely on third parties like the Internet Archive to preserve their websites. A possible solution for raising awareness of web archives is developing workshops as well as mentorship programs for Latin American librarians and digital humanists looking to start with web archiving. For the linguistic barrier, translating the documentation of web archiving tools to other languages can be a first step to encourage their use in Latin America. {\\textless}br{\\textgreater} Slides for the IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2023 Online Day.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\turldate = {2025-03-12},\n\tpublisher = {IIPC},\n\tauthor = {Colin-Arce, Alan and Fernandez, Sylvia and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Benítez-Pérez, Verónica and García, Abraham},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2143928/},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n Web archives have been growing in popularity in Global North countries as a way of preserving a part of their political, cultural, and social life carried out online. However, its spread to other regions has been slower because of several technical, economic, and social barriers. In this presentation, we discuss the main limitations in the uptake of web archiving in Spanish-speaking Latin American countries and its implications for the access and use of web archives. The first barrier to web archiving in these countries is the lack of awareness of web archives among librarians and archivists. According to Scopus data from 2022, out of 909 documents with the words “web archiv*” on the title, abstract, or keywords, 10 papers are from Spanish-Speaking Latin American countries. In worldwide web archiving surveys, there are no initiatives from Latin America yet (D. Gomes et al., 2011; P. Gomes, 2020), and we could only identify 5 Latin American institutions on Archive-It, none of which had active public collections in 2022. Another barrier is the cost of web archiving services like Archive-It, which can be unaffordable for many institutions in the region. Even if they can afford these services or use free tools, most web archiving software is created only in English and it does not smoothly support multilingual collections or collections in languages other than English (for example, the default metadata fields for collections and seeds are in English and adding them in other languages is not straightforward). This unequal access to web archives between the Global North and South comes with the risk that Global North websites get preserved, organized, accessed, and used, while Latin America and other regions continue depending solely on third parties like the Internet Archive to preserve their websites. A possible solution for raising awareness of web archives is developing workshops as well as mentorship programs for Latin American librarians and digital humanists looking to start with web archiving. For the linguistic barrier, translating the documentation of web archiving tools to other languages can be a first step to encourage their use in Latin America. \\textlessbr\\textgreater Slides for the IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2023 Online Day.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redes sociales... legales y gestión de contenido social media, curso de capacitación dirigido a integrantes de CUPA-FCPyS, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 12 y 13 de julio del 2023.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2023.\n Artwork Size: 4874770 Bytes Pages: 4874770 Bytes\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redes$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_redes_2023,\n\ttitle = {Redes sociales... legales y gestión de contenido social media, curso de capacitación dirigido a integrantes de {CUPA}-{FCPyS}, {Universidad} {Autónoma} del {Estado} de {México}, 12 y 13 de julio del 2023.},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Redes_sociales_legales_y_gesti_n_de_contenido_social_media_curso_de_capacitaci_n_dirigido_a_integrantes_de_CUPA-FCPyS_Universidad_Aut_noma_del_Estado_de_M_xico_12_y_13_de_julio_del_2023_/24030243/1},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.24030243.V1},\n\tabstract = {El objetivo de este curso es proporcionar a los integrantes del ámbito audiovisual las habilidades y conocimientos necesarios para comprender y aplicar las leyes y regulaciones relacionadas con las redes sociales, así como para desarrollar estrategias efectivas de gestión de contenido en plataformas de social media. A través de este curso de capacitación, los participantes adquirirán las competencias para crear, publicar y administrar contenido de manera legal y ética, maximizando así el impacto de sus esfuerzos en el entorno digital.},\n\turldate = {2025-01-28},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Artwork Size: 4874770 Bytes\nPages: 4874770 Bytes},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Miradas sobre la reestructuración de la globalización.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n González-López, S.; Gorenstein, S.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista de ciencias sociales, segunda época, 13(44): 7–10. 2023.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Miradas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{gonzalez-lopez_miradas_2023,\n\ttitle = {Miradas sobre la reestructuración de la globalización},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/records/10278421},\n\tdoi = {10.5281/zenodo.10278421},\n\tabstract = {La Revista de Ciencias Sociales (segunda época) de la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina, presenta un dossier, coordinado por Silvia Gorenstein, Rosario Rogel-Salazar y Sergio González López, que contiene cinco artículos sobre problemáticas urgentes en torno a la actual mutación de la globalización. El dossier, realizado en el marco del reciente Seminario XVII de la Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio, es presentado por los coordinadores.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {44},\n\turldate = {2023-12-06},\n\tjournal = {Revista de ciencias sociales, segunda época},\n\tauthor = {González-López, Sergio and Gorenstein, Silvia and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tpages = {7--10},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revista Quivera: un balance a 25 años de camino.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quivera Revista de Estudios Territoriales, 26(1): 6–20. December 2023.\n Number: 1\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Revista$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_revista_2023,\n\ttitle = {Revista {Quivera}: un balance a 25 años de camino},\n\tvolume = {26},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2594-102X},\n\tshorttitle = {Revista {Quivera}},\n\turl = {https://quivera.uaemex.mx/article/view/22360},\n\tdoi = {10.36677/qrvet.v26i1.22360},\n\tabstract = {Se presenta la evolución de la revista Quivera en sus primeros 25 años de existencia. Iniciando como Metrópolis durante la década de los años 90 del Siglo XX, como parte de la institucionalización de la producción académica en México, la revista se transformó en Quivera cuyo número cero empezó a circular en 1998. Se destaca la búsqueda de una identidad única y la colaboración con artistas para crear portadas innovadoras. A lo largo de su trayectoria, Quivera se ha consolidado como una revista destacada en estudios territoriales en México y América Latina, evidenciado por su inclusión en bases de datos reconocidas. Aunque enfrenta desafíos digitales, como mejorar su presencia en entornos en línea, el documento resalta la importancia de adaptarse a cambios tecnológicos y sociales para asegurar la continuidad de Quivera como un referente en la producción académica regional. La labor de quienes lideran la revista será crucial para mantener su compromiso con la calidad editorial y su contribución al conocimiento en el campo de los estudios territoriales.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-12-28},\n\tjournal = {Quivera Revista de Estudios Territoriales},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tpages = {6--20},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2022\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Value of Social Annotation for Teaching and Learning: Promoting Comprehension, Collaboration and Critical Thinking With Hypothesis.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kalir, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Technical Report San Francisco, CA, 2022.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@techreport{kalir_value_2022,\n\taddress = {San Francisco, CA},\n\ttitle = {The {Value} of {Social} {Annotation} for {Teaching} and {Learning}: {Promoting} {Comprehension}, {Collaboration} and {Critical} {Thinking} {With} {Hypothesis}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://docdrop.org/download_annotation_doc/The-Value-of-Social-Annotation-for-Teaching-and-Learning-7gsxw.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tauthor = {Kalir, J.},\n\tyear = {2022},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2021\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ciencia Abierta en acción: plataformas y herramientas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In García-Guerrero, M.; Rodríguez-Palacios, S.; Salas-Zendejo, D.; Ramírez-Montoya, M. S.; and Torres-Hernández, J., editor(s), Ciencia Abierta: Opciones y experiencias para México y Latinoamérica, of Universidad, pages 366. Editorial Octaedro \\textbar Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Barcelona. España, 1a edition, 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Ciencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_ciencia_2021,\n\taddress = {Barcelona. España},\n\tedition = {1a},\n\tseries = {Universidad},\n\ttitle = {Ciencia {Abierta} en acción: plataformas y herramientas},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-84-18615-46-7},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25396246.v1},\n\tabstract = {Este capítulo explica en qué consiste el ecosistema de la Ciencia Abierta, cuáles son sus características y componentes, a la vez que reflexiona sobre los cambios que implica respecto a las tradicionales estrategias de comunicación académica y cómo ello modifica la forma de hacer ciencia en el entorno digital. Se describen algunas plataformas y herramientas específicas que forman parte de este ecosistema y que pueden ser utilizadas en la docencia e investigación},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2021-04-14},\n\tbooktitle = {Ciencia {Abierta}: {Opciones} y experiencias para {México} y {Latinoamérica}},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial Octaedro {\\textbar} Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {García-Guerrero, Montserrat and Rodríguez-Palacios, Sara and Salas-Zendejo, Dagoberto and Ramírez-Montoya, María Soledad and Torres-Hernández, Joel},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {366},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Alfabetización Mediática e Informacional en el ámbito académico: hacia una ciencia digital abierta y colaborativa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n November 2021.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Alfabetización$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_alfabetizacion_2021,\n\ttype = {Académica},\n\ttitle = {Alfabetización {Mediática} e {Informacional} en el ámbito académico: hacia una ciencia digital abierta y colaborativa},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{AMIDI}},\n\turl = {https://www.amidi.org/alfabetizacion-digital-ciencia/},\n\tabstract = {Los retos de la comunicación académica y científica en la era digital implican no sólo el uso de ciertas «tecnologías» en el trabajo de investigación y en la docencia, o el envío de correos electrónicos en lugar de documentos en papel. Se trata de preguntarnos si quienes integramos la academia estamos preparados y preparadas para dejar de pensar —y actuar— solo analógicamente, y transitar al trabajo académico mediante el uso extensivo de plataformas digitales.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2024-03-12},\n\tjournal = {AMIDI: Alfabetización Mediática e Informacional y Diálogo Intercultural (UNESCO)},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2021},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Creation of Huellas Incómodas during COVID-19: Pedagogía, investigación y activismo digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Monroy-García, A.; Colin-Arce, A.; Benítez-Pérez, V.; Fernandez, S.; and Rosenblum, B.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In ACH2021 Conference, 2021. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Creation$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_creation_2021,\n\ttitle = {Creation of {Huellas} {Incómodas} during {COVID}-19: {Pedagogía}, investigación y activismo digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Creation_of_Huellas_Inc_modas_during_COVID-19_Pedagog_a_investigaci_n_y_activismo_digital_ACH2021_Conference_Friday_23_July_2021_/15019983/4},\n\tdoi = {DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.15019983.V4},\n\tabstract = {Digital Humanities projects such as Documenting the Now and Chicana por mi Raza have demonstrated the importance of preserving and documenting social movements in the United States. Due to recent feminist protests in Mexico and Latin America, it is important to think about models to intervene in power structures that construct and document history through racist and misogynic attitudes reflected in archives, monuments and policies. Huellas Incómodas (Uncomfortable Footprints) seeks to document, contextualize, and digitally preserve the traces of local social protest movements, and to explore related issues such as privacy, ephemerality, and transnational and local community partnerships. In its first phase, launched during the COVID-19 pandemic, it worked toward pedagogies and research to create digital resources, preservation methods and a non-hierarchical learn-by-doing participatory model to preserve physical and digital activism of the 2019-20 student-feminist movement at Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.},\n\tbooktitle = {{ACH2021} {Conference}},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Monroy-García, Abraham and Colin-Arce, Alan and Benítez-Pérez, Verónica and Fernandez, Sylvia and Rosenblum, Brian},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.15019983.V4},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Investigaciones sobre sostenibilidad de los recursos naturales en el Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zamora-Martínez, M. C.; Maya-Martínez, A.; Uzcanga-Pérez, N. G.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; Reygadas-Prado, G. F.; and Villavicencio-Gutiérrez, E. E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, (Especial-1). 2021.\n Publisher: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Investigaciones$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 3 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{zamora-martinez_investigaciones_2021,\n\ttitle = {Investigaciones sobre sostenibilidad de los recursos naturales en el {Instituto} {Nacional} de {Investigaciones} {Forestales}, {Agrícolas} y {Pecuarias}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.29298%2Frmcf.v12iespecial-1.1144},\n\tdoi = {10.29298/rmcf.v12iespecial-1.1144},\n\tabstract = {Se presenta una síntesis del conocimiento generado en el Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) sobre sostenibilidad de los recursos naturales, a partir de una investigación documental en las bases de datos Scopus (1972-2020), Web of Science (WoS), en la sub base SciELO Citation Index (2002-2020) y la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales (RMCF) (1985-2009). Se utilizaron 10 palabras clave, y el análisis se hizo con los programas Bibliometrix, VOSviewer e IBM-SPSS 23.0 para la integración de redes de colaboración e identificación de coautorías. Destaca que las publicaciones de los investigadores forestales son escasas en las bases consultadas y la mayoría data del presente siglo; se recuperaron, inicialmente, 3 653 documentos en Scopus, y en una segunda instancia 210; en WoS, 1 447; y en RMCF, 28. Lo anterior coincide con el despunte del interés global por el cambio climático, su impacto en los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad; así como la importancia de los servicios ecosistémicos y el manejo forestal sustentable. Otro aspecto relevante es el manejo del agua en los agroecosistemas y el manejo integrado de cuencas. Se identificaron cinco redes de colaboración en Scopus, 15 en WoS y cuatro en la RMCF. El INIFAP tiene un capital humano con experiencia y conocimientos en los tres sectores que lo integran; así como de especialistas en socioeconomía, que constituyen una fortaleza para la conformación de colaboraciones multisectoriales para la realización de proyectos de gran visión sobre el desarrollo sostenible de los recursos naturales.},\n\tnumber = {Especial-1},\n\tjournal = {Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales},\n\tauthor = {Zamora-Martínez, Marisela Cristina and Maya-Martínez, Aixchel and Uzcanga-Pérez, Nelda Guadalupe and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Reygadas-Prado, Guadalupe Fabiola and Villavicencio-Gutiérrez, Eulalia Edith},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2020\n \n \n (7)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Formación Artística. Experiencias y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria. Ciclo de conversatorios virtuales: Documento de reflexión.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n OEI \\textbar México \\textbar Publicaciones \\textbar, Ciudad de México, Primera edición edition, 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Formación$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{rogel-salazar_formacion_2020,\n\taddress = {Ciudad de México},\n\tedition = {Primera edición},\n\ttitle = {Formación {Artística}. {Experiencias} y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria. {Ciclo} de conversatorios virtuales: {Documento} de reflexión.},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://oei.int/oficinas/mexico/publicaciones/formacion-artistica-experiencias-y-reflexiones-ante-la-virtualidad-necesaria-ciclo-de-conversatorios-virtuales-documento-de-reflexion},\n\tabstract = {Publicación que recopila las sugerencias, reflexiones y buenas prácticas en torno a la formación artística y la virtualidad necesaria en tiempos de pandemia y post-pandemia derivadas del Ciclo de Conversatorios “Formación artística: experiencias y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria”.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2021-03-04},\n\tpublisher = {OEI {\\textbar} México {\\textbar} Publicaciones {\\textbar}},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {OEI},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Presence of academic journals on citizen security in regional and international databases.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Tinoco-García, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In City & Security. Communities and citizens’ rights in the coproduction of security, pages 476. LAP Lambert Academic Publ, S.l., 2020.\n OCLC: 1197847370\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Presence$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_presence_2020,\n\taddress = {S.l.},\n\ttitle = {Presence of academic journals on citizen security in regional and international databases},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-620-0-55087-3},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10929136},\n\tabstract = {Communities and citizens' rights in security co-production addresses the complexity of the city and its different forms of insecurity. Since violence and crime find specific correlation within each city. In this book, experts from various regions and disciplines analyse these phenomena in the light of the debates and proposals that the United Nations offered during Habitat III and the IX World Urban Forum, bringing international practices in the area of prevention and citizens' rights. The book opens up a space for experts to study the complex challenge of security- from a multidisciplinary proposal- in four aspects. These are: (i) the state of the perspectives on security and insecurity, (ii) the different approaches to address urban violence, (iii) prevention for particular groups and, finally, (iv) a vision of urban space and its relation to violence.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {City \\& {Security}. {Communities} and citizens’ rights in the coproduction of security},\n\tpublisher = {LAP Lambert Academic Publ},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Tinoco-García, Ivett},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tnote = {OCLC: 1197847370},\n\tpages = {476},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tutorial: ¿Cómo utilizar la herramienta de anotación web Hypothes.is?.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Tutorial:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_tutorial:_2020,\n\ttitle = {Tutorial: ¿{Cómo} utilizar la herramienta de anotación web {Hypothes}.is?},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Tutorial},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klIKXj1qnUQ&list=PLLDz9GYV7-mhUWoCYMlBcaV5esSP3gJtR&index=2},\n\tabstract = {El objetivo de este video es explicar cómo funciona la herramienta Hypothes.is, para la anotación de textos web y cómo funciona la anotación social de textos.\n\nSe explica:\n1. Registro\n2. Cómo habilitar Grupos\n3. Ejemplos de anotaciones en html, PDF y XML\n4. Ejemplos de textos que no se pueden anotar\n5. Cómo comentar comentarios \n6. Diferencia entre anotaciones y noatas\n7. Lectura hipertextual\n8. Cómo compartir en redes sociales\n9. Cómo generar estadísticas\n\nEl uso de herramientas de \\#CienciaAbierta es muy importante en el contexto de la virtualidad obligatoria deriva de la emergencia sanitaria por la amenaza del contagio de \\#COVID-19},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tutorial: Uso de Grupos de Zotero para compartir bibliografía de un curso.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Tutorial:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_tutorial:_2020,\n\ttitle = {Tutorial: {Uso} de {Grupos} de {Zotero} para compartir bibliografía de un curso},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Tutorial},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1RPOwv6sUA&list=PLLDz9GYV7-mhUWoCYMlBcaV5esSP3gJtR},\n\tabstract = {Se describe la forma en que los Grupos de Zotero pueden servir para compartir la bibliografía de un curso.\n\nTutorial de apoyo para los estudiantes de la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Tutorial de uso Flipgrid para clases a distancia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Tutorial$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_tutorial_2020,\n\ttitle = {Tutorial de uso {Flipgrid} para clases a distancia},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbT0lODhTrA&list=PLLDz9GYV7-mhUWoCYMlBcaV5esSP3gJtR&index=3},\n\tabstract = {En el marco de la educación remota de emergencia, fue necesario recurrir a herramientas digitales que permitan continuar la labor docente que era meramente presencial. El uso de Flipgrid fomenta la interacción con los estudiantes y a ellos les permite entregar trabajos de forma sencilla y divertida.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n OEI \\textbar México \\textbar Publicaciones \\textbar Formación Artística. Experiencias y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria. Ciclo de conversatorios virtuales: Documento de reflexión.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n OEI\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2020.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"OEI$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{oei_oei_2020,\n\ttitle = {{OEI} {\\textbar} {México} {\\textbar} {Publicaciones} {\\textbar} {Formación} {Artística}. {Experiencias} y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria. {Ciclo} de conversatorios virtuales: {Documento} de reflexión.},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {{OEI} {\\textbar} {México} {\\textbar} {Publicaciones} {\\textbar} {Formación} {Artística}. {Experiencias} y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria. {Ciclo} de conversatorios virtuales},\n\turl = {https://oei.int/oficinas/mexico/publicaciones/formacion-artistica-experiencias-y-reflexiones-ante-la-virtualidad-necesaria-ciclo-de-conversatorios-virtuales-documento-de-reflexion},\n\tabstract = {Publicación que recopila las sugerencias, reflexiones y buenas prácticas en torno a la formación artística y la virtualidad necesaria en tiempos de pandemia y post-pandemia derivadas del Ciclo de Conversatorios “Formación artística: experiencias y reflexiones ante la virtualidad necesaria”.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2021-03-04},\n\tauthor = {OEI},\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Presencia de las revistas académicas de seguridad ciudadana en bases de datos regionales e internacionales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel Salazar, R.; and Tinoco, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In City & Security. Communities and citizens’ rights inthe co-production of security. LAP LAMBERT ACADEMIC PUBL, S.l., 2020.\n OCLC: 1197847370\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Presencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel_salazar_presencia_2020,\n\taddress = {S.l.},\n\ttitle = {Presencia de las revistas académicas de seguridad ciudadana en bases de datos regionales e internacionales},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC)},\n\tisbn = {978-620-0-55087-3},\n\turl = {https://www.lap-publishing.com/catalogue/details/gb/978-620-0-55087-3/city-security},\n\tabstract = {Communities and citizens' rights in security co-production addresses the complexity of the city and its different forms of insecurity. Since violence and crime find specific correlation within each city. In this book, experts from various regions and disciplines analyse these phenomena in the light of the debates and proposals that the United Nations offered during Habitat III and the IX World Urban Forum, bringing international practices in the area of prevention and citizens' rights. The book opens up a space for experts to study the complex challenge of security- from a multidisciplinary proposal- in four aspects. These are: (i) the state of the perspectives on security and insecurity, (ii) the different approaches to address urban violence, (iii) prevention for particular groups and, finally, (iv) a vision of urban space and its relation to violence.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tbooktitle = {City \\& {Security}. {Communities} and citizens’ rights inthe co-production of security},\n\tpublisher = {LAP LAMBERT ACADEMIC PUBL},\n\tauthor = {Rogel Salazar, Rosario and Tinoco, Ivett},\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tnote = {OCLC: 1197847370},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2019\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cambios en la comunicación científica transforman la gestión del conocimiento.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel Salazar, R.; and Fernández Flores, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018, México, June 2019. UNAM\n Accepted: 2019-06-25T00:29:04Z Company: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018. Distributor: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018. Institution: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018. Label: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018. Publisher: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Cambios$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel_salazar_cambios_2019,\n\taddress = {México},\n\ttitle = {Cambios en la comunicación científica transforman la gestión del conocimiento},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://www.ru.tic.unam.mx/xmlui/handle/123456789/3500},\n\tabstract = {Rosario Rogel Salazar señala que la edición digital modifica la manera en la que se gestiona el conocimiento y en la que se comunica la ciencia.},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\turldate = {2024-10-23},\n\tbooktitle = {Jornada de {Visibilidad} {Web}  2018},\n\tpublisher = {UNAM},\n\tauthor = {Rogel Salazar, Rosario and Fernández Flores, Rafael},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {Accepted: 2019-06-25T00:29:04Z\nCompany: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web  2018.\nDistributor: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web  2018.\nInstitution: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web  2018.\nLabel: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web  2018.\nPublisher: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Cómputo y de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación. Visibilidad Web. Jornada de Visibilidad Web 2018.},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ciencia Abierta. Herramientas imprescindibles para el bibliotecario en la era digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Feria, L.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Ciencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_ciencia_2019,\n\ttitle = {Ciencia {Abierta}. {Herramientas} imprescindibles para el bibliotecario en la era digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Ciencia_Abierta_Herramientas_imprescindibles_para_el_bibliotecario_en_la_era_digital/8300081/1},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Feria, Lourdes},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.8300081.V1},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Estrategias de visibilidad de la producción académica de las politólogas en medios digitales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Estrategias$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_estrategias_2019,\n\taddress = {Insituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {{PPT}},\n\ttitle = {Estrategias de visibilidad de la producción académica de las politólogas en medios digitales},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Estrategias_de_visibilidad_de_la_producci_n_acad_mica_de_las_polit_logas_en_medios_digitales/8279720},\n\tabstract = {Se comparten algunas estrategias que permiten identificar los distintos tipos de perfiles académicos digitales, sus diferencias, ventajas y desventajas de cada uno. El objetivo es compartir con @Redpolitologas ideas concretas y prácticas que ayuden a vincular la difusión del conocimiento generado por sus integrantes.Promovemos el uso de @Figshare @FigshareAmbassador},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2019-06-26},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.8279720.v2},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sociología: Rosario Rogel Salazar.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Infante, S., editor(s), La ciencia y yo. Preguntas hipotéticas respondidas por científicos de verdad, of Cuente a la Luna. Ciencia pata párblos y remisos.. Figshare, 2019.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Sociología:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_sociologi:_2019,\n\tseries = {Cuente a la {Luna}. {Ciencia} pata párblos y remisos.},\n\ttitle = {Sociología: {Rosario} {Rogel} {Salazar}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-715-381-8},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/La_ciencia_y_yo_Preguntas_hipot_ticas_respondidas_por_cient_ficos_de_verdad/7704755},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tbooktitle = {La ciencia y yo. {Preguntas} hipotéticas respondidas por científicos de verdad},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Infante, Said},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7704755},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2018\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de comunicación indizadas en WoS, Scopus & Bases de Datos de Acceso Abierto (datos).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Revistas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_revistas_2018,\n\ttitle = {Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de comunicación indizadas en {WoS}, {Scopus} \\&amp; {Bases} de {Datos} de {Acceso} {Abierto} (datos)},\n\tcopyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Revistas_cient_ficas_latinoamericanas_de_comunicaci_n_Indizadas_en_WoS_Scopus_Bases_de_Datos_de_Acceso_Abierto/6321794},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6321794},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor Daniel},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El grupo de discusión: revisión de premisas metodológicas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (63): 274–282. December 2018.\n ZSCC: 0000010\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_grupo_2018,\n\ttitle = {El grupo de discusión: revisión de premisas metodológicas},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0717-554X},\n\tshorttitle = {El grupo de discusión},\n\turl = {https://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/52006},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tEl objetivo central de esta reflexión es analizar dos premisas teórico-metodológicas que subyacen a la instrumentación del grupo de discusión como herramienta de análisis cualitativo en las ciencias sociales: las premisas que se vinculan con la naturaleza del discurso que se genera a través de la aplicación de esta técnica y las premisas que se relacionan con las características del método. Se concluye que es importante reflexionar teóricamente previo a la aplicación de estas estrategias, y no dar por hecho que implican credibilidad y legitimidad en sí mismas.},\n\tlanguage = {es-ES},\n\tnumber = {63},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {ZSCC: 0000010},\n\tpages = {274--282},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Estrategias para difundir tu producción científica en la era digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Estrategias$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_estrategias_2018,\n\taddress = {Facultad de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UNAM, Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Estrategias para difundir tu producción científica en la era digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Estrategias_para_difundir_tu_producci_n_cient_fica_en_la_era_digital/5867049/1},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5867049.V1},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ciencia Abierta a la Investigación.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Leite, F.; Costa, M.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Saravia, M.; Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Malgorzata Lisowska; Recavarren, I.; Huamán Granados, S.; Talavera Ibarra, A. M.; Chávez Sánchez, G.; and Donoso Vegas, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Seminario Ciencia Abierta a la Investigación, Lima. Perú, 2018. Figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{leite_ciencia_2018,\n\taddress = {Lima. Perú},\n\ttitle = {Ciencia {Abierta} a la {Investigación}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4281383.v1},\n\tbooktitle = {Seminario {Ciencia} {Abierta} a la {Investigación}},\n\tpublisher = {Figshare},\n\tauthor = {Leite, Fernando and Costa, Michelli and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Saravia, Miguel and Estrada-Cuzcano, Alonso and {Malgorzata Lisowska} and Recavarren, Isabel and Huamán Granados, Susana and Talavera Ibarra, Ana María and Chávez Sánchez, Guillermo and Donoso Vegas, Rodrigo},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.3795706},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Presencia de las revistas académicas de seguridad ciudadana en bases de datos regionales e internacionales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Tinoco-García, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Assiago, J.; Vanderschueren, F.; and Suárez, A., editor(s), Ciudad y Seguridad. Las comunidades y los derechos ciudadanos en la coproducción de la seguridad, pages 85–95. Consejo Editorial de la Administración Pública Estatal, Toluca, México, Primera edition, 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Presencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_presencia_2018,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\tedition = {Primera},\n\ttitle = {Presencia de las revistas académicas de seguridad ciudadana en bases de datos regionales e internacionales},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-495-659-7},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/book/Presencia_de_las_revistas_acad_micas_de_seguridad_ciudadana_en_bases_de_datos_regionales_e_internacionales/8323595},\n\tabstract = {Se identifica la presencia de revistas académicas que tengan como objetivo\ndifundir contenidos relacionados con la seguridad ciudadana dentro de bases de\ndatos bibliográficas regionales e internacionales.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tbooktitle = {Ciudad y {Seguridad}. {Las} comunidades y los derechos ciudadanos en la coproducción de la seguridad},\n\tpublisher = {Consejo Editorial de la Administración Pública Estatal},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Tinoco-García, Ivett},\n\teditor = {Assiago, Juma and Vanderschueren, Franz and Suárez, Andrés},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/m9.figshare.8323595.v1},\n\tpages = {85--95},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Estrategias para investigar y publicar en temas jurídicos, en la era digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2018.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Estrategias$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_estrategias_2018,\n\taddress = {Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Estrategias para investigar y publicar en temas jurídicos, en la era digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Estrategias_para_investigadr_y_publicar_en_temas_jur_dicos_en_la_era_digital/6465053/2},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6465053.V2},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Open Science & Open Access: nuances and contrasts in the case of Latin America.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Comparative & International Education Society. Re-mapping global edication South-North Dialogue, Ciudad de México, 2018. figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Open$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_open_2018,\n\taddress = {Ciudad de México},\n\ttitle = {Open {Science} \\& {Open} {Access}: nuances and contrasts in the case of {Latin} {America}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Open_Science_Open_Access_nuances_and_contrasts_in_the_case_of_Latin_America/6076319/1},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6076319.V1},\n\tbooktitle = {Comparative \\& {International} {Education} {Society}. {Re}-mapping global edication {South}-{North} {Dialogue}},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de comunicación indizadas en WoS, Scopus & Bases de Datos de Acceso Abierto.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In XXIX Encuentro Nacional AMIC, Monterrey. N.L., México, 2018. figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Revistas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_revistas_2018,\n\taddress = {Monterrey. N.L., México},\n\ttitle = {Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de comunicación indizadas en {WoS}, {Scopus} \\& {Bases} de {Datos} de {Acceso} {Abierto}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/Revistas_cient_ficas_latinoamericanas_de_comunicaci_n_Indizadas_en_WoS_Scopus_Bases_de_Datos_de_Acceso_Abierto/6321794},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6321794},\n\tbooktitle = {{XXIX} {Encuentro} {Nacional} {AMIC}},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor Daniel},\n\tyear = {2018},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2017\n \n \n (13)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de Comunicación indizadas en WoS, Scopus y bases de datos de Acceso Abierto.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Comunicación y Sociedad, (30): 167–196. 2017.\n Number: 30\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Revistas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_revistas_2017,\n\ttitle = {Revistas científicas latinoamericanas de {Comunicación} indizadas en {WoS}, {Scopus} y bases de datos de {Acceso} {Abierto}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2448-9042},\n\turl = {http://www.comunicacionysociedad.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/comsoc/article/view/6514},\n\tdoi = {10.32870/cys.v0i30.6514},\n\tabstract = {Resumen\n\t\t\t\t\tSe analiza la presencia de revistas de comunicación editadas en Latinoamérica en bases de datos científicas regionales e internacionales. Se identifica su participación por país e idioma de publicación, así como su disponibilidad al público ya sea abierta o de paga. El principal hallazgo es que –pese al incremento de la profesionalización e investigación en esta área– la presencia de estas revistas en dichas bases es limitada.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {30},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Comunicación y Sociedad},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Number: 30},\n\tpages = {167--196},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Transición al esquema electrónico. Retos y oportunidades de las revistas científicas en el país.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5216260.v1\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Transición$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_transicion_2017,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Transición al esquema electrónico. {Retos} y oportunidades de las revistas científicas en el país},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Transici_n_al_esquema_electr_nico_Retos_y_oportunidades_de_las_revistas_cient_ficas_en_el_pa_s/5216260/1},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5216260.v1},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La importancia de la edición científica y los fugaces bordes de sus límites.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Espacio I+D Innovación más Desarrollo, 6(14): 8–20. 2017.\n ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_importancia_2017,\n\ttitle = {La importancia de la edición científica y los fugaces bordes de sus límites},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {20076703},\n\turl = {https://www.espacioimasd.unach.mx/index.php/Inicio/article/view/118},\n\tdoi = {10.31644/IMASD.14.2017.a01},\n\tnumber = {14},\n\turldate = {2021-08-12},\n\tjournal = {Revista Espacio I+D Innovación más Desarrollo},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},\n\tpages = {8--20},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Curso-Taller: Estrategias de descubrimiento de información académica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n Publisher: figshare\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Curso-Taller:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_curso-taller:_2017,\n\taddress = {Centro de Investigaciones en América Latina y el Caribe, UNAM, Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Curso-{Taller}: {Estrategias} de descubrimiento de información académica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5202427},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor Daniel},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Publisher: figshare},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Analysis of the use of OJS interoperable resources. Study since the journals included in SCRCyT, Conacyt, Mexico.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In OJS Conference, Montreal, Canadá, 2017. figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Analysis$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_analysis_2017,\n\taddress = {Montreal, Canadá},\n\ttitle = {Analysis of the use of {OJS} interoperable resources. {Study} since the journals included in {SCRCyT}, {Conacyt}, {Mexico}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Analysis_of_the_use_of_OJS_interoperable_resources_Study_since_the_journals_included_in_SCRCyT_Conacyt_Mexico/5271523/3},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5271523.V3},\n\tbooktitle = {{OJS} {Conference}},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor Daniel},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Diez estrategias para difundir resultados de investigación científica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Diez$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_diez_2017,\n\taddress = {Colegio de Sonora},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Diez estrategias para difundir resultados de investigación científica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Diez_estrategias_para_difundir_resultados_de_investigaci_n_cient_fica/5027903},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5027903},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Importancia del #AccesoAbierto en la calidad de la producción científica y académica de las universidades.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Seminario Internacional de Acceso Abierto en las Universidades Latinoamericanas, Lima. Perú, 2017. figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Importancia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_importancia_2017,\n\taddress = {Lima. Perú},\n\ttitle = {Importancia del \\#{AccesoAbierto} en la calidad de la producción científica y académica de las universidades},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5072788.v1},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5072788},\n\tbooktitle = {Seminario {Internacional} de {Acceso} {Abierto} en las {Universidades} {Latinoamericanas}},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Curso-Taller: Técnicas, estrategias y recomendaciones para investigar y publicar en la era digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Curso-Taller:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_curso-taller:_2017,\n\taddress = {Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Curso-{Taller}: {Técnicas}, estrategias y recomendaciones para investigar y publicar en la era digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/T_cnicas_estrategias_y_recomendaciones_para_investigar_y_publicar_en_la_era_digital/5027912},\n\tabstract = {Diapositivas para 4 temas: \n1. Distintos medios de comunicación de la ciencia\n2. Del Acceso Abierto a la Ciencia Abierta\n3. Normalización de procesos editoriales y producción científica\n4. Nociones básicas de bibliometría y cienciometría para editores en formación},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5027912},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Seminario Internacional de Acceso Abierto en las Universidades Latinoamericanas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Grupo De Pesquisa Publicações Eletrônicas; Leite, F.; Costa, M.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Saravia, M.; Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Malgorzata Lisowska; Recavarren, I.; Granados, S. H.; Ibarra, A. M. T.; Sánchez, G. C.; and Vegas, R. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 2017. Figshare\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Seminario$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{grupo_de_pesquisa_publicacoes_eletronicas_seminario_2017,\n\ttitle = {Seminario {Internacional} de {Acceso} {Abierto} en las {Universidades} {Latinoamericanas}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/collections/Seminario_Internacional_de_Acceso_Abierto_en_las_Universidades_Latinoamericanas/3795706},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.3795706},\n\tpublisher = {Figshare},\n\tauthor = {{Grupo De Pesquisa Publicações Eletrônicas} and Leite, Fernando and Costa, Michelli and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Saravia, Miguel and Estrada-Cuzcano, Alonso and {Malgorzata Lisowska} and Recavarren, Isabel and Granados, Susana Huamán and Ibarra, Ana María Talavera and Sánchez, Guillermo Chávez and Vegas, Rodrigo Donoso},\n\tyear = {2017},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Importancia del acceso abierto en la calidad de la producción científica y académica de las universidades.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Importancia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_importancia_2017,\n\ttitle = {Importancia del acceso abierto en la calidad de la producción científica y académica de las universidades},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Importancia_del_acceso_abierto_en_la_calidad_de_la_produccio_n_cienti_fica_y_acade_mica_de_las_universidades/5072788},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5072788},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Prólogo al libro: La palabra electrónica.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n . 2017.\n Publisher: figshare\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_prologo_2017,\n\ttitle = {Prólogo al libro: {La} palabra electrónica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Publisher: figshare},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Técnicas, estrategias y recomendaciones para investigar y publicar en la era digital.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Técnicas,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_tecnicas_2017,\n\ttitle = {Técnicas, estrategias y recomendaciones para investigar y publicar en la era digital},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/T_cnicas_estrategias_y_recomendaciones_para_investigar_y_publicar_en_la_era_digital/5027912},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5027912},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Taller CIALC-UNAM. pdf.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Santiago-Bautista, I.; and Martínez-Domínguez, N. D.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2017.\n Publisher: figshare\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_taller_2017,\n\ttitle = {Taller {CIALC}-{UNAM}. pdf},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin and Martínez-Domínguez, Néstor Daniel},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Publisher: figshare},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2016\n \n \n (12)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n El rol de las bibliotecas en el contexto de la Ciencia Abierta.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Morán-Guzmá, A. G.; and López-Ruelas, S., editor(s), Bibliotecas e Inclusión Social, pages 170. Universidad de Guadalajara, 1a edition, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_rol_2016,\n\tedition = {1a},\n\ttitle = {El rol de las bibliotecas en el contexto de la {Ciencia} {Abierta}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-742-671-4},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Bibliotecas e {Inclusión} {Social}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad de Guadalajara},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Morán-Guzmá, Ana Gricelda and López-Ruelas, Sergio},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {170},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Retos de la información académica hacia la transición electrónica y el acceso abierto.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Tarango, J.; and Cortés-Vera, J., editor(s), Gobierno abierto y ciudadanía digital, of Biblioteca Alfagrama. Alfagrama Ediciones, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Retos$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{tarango_retos_2016,\n\taddress = {Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires},\n\tseries = {Biblioteca {Alfagrama}},\n\ttitle = {Retos de la información académica hacia la transición electrónica y el acceso abierto},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-987-1305-90-2},\n\turl = {10.6084/m9.figshare.25396309},\n\tbooktitle = {Gobierno abierto y ciudadanía digital},\n\tpublisher = {Alfagrama Ediciones},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Tarango, Javier and Cortés-Vera, Jesús},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los comités de las revistas científicas: hacia la conformación de una política editorial.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n Artwork Size: 5979337 Bytes Publisher: Figshare\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Los$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_comites_2016,\n\taddress = {El Colegio de México, Ciudad de México, México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Los comités de las revistas científicas: hacia la conformación de una política editorial},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Los comités de las revistas científicas},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3205933.v1},\n\tabstract = {Se analiza la estructura organizacional de una\nrevista científica y se abordan las sigueintes cuestiones:\n\n1) ¿Cómo se conforma un comité editorial de\nuna revista científica?\n\n2) ¿Cuáles son sus funciones?\n\n3) ¿Existen lineamientos internacionales\nsobre la conformación de los comités?, ¿las revistas mexicanas tendrían que\napegarse a ellos?\n\n4) ¿Qué es lo que provoca la diferencia\nentre tener un comité editorial activo y otro “honorario”?\n\n5) ¿Existe algún tipo de reconocimiento\npara los miembros de un comité en instancias evaluadoras nacionales?},\n\turldate = {2023-09-27},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {Artwork Size: 5979337 Bytes\nPublisher: Figshare},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Envisioning a World Beyond APCs/BPCs, Part 1.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n http://hdl.handle.net/1808/22153\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Envisioning$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{emmett_envisioning_2016,\n\taddress = {Lawrence, Kansas},\n\ttitle = {Envisioning a {World} {Beyond} {APCs}/{BPCs}, {Part} 1},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://mediahub.ku.edu/media/A+Symposium+on+Open+Access+Publishing+-+part+2/0_3n4wzyfe},\n\tabstract = {This archival page includes documents and recordings related to the international symposium, “Envisioning a World Beyond APCs/BPCs,” held in Lawrence, Kansas, on Thursday and Friday, November 17-18. The presenters were a group of 18 internationally respected scholars, publishers, university librarians, and executives from foundations and organizations, who were asked to participate in a discussion about current models available for achieving an expansive, inclusive, and balanced worldwide open publishing ecosystem. The symposium was co-sponsored by the University of Kansas Libraries, Open Access Network (a project of K{\\textbar}N Consultants), Allen Press, SPARC, and ARL. The materials included here are the symposium schedule, recordings of Parts 1 and 2 of the Nov. 17 livestream, a transcript of the livestream, and team proposals originating from the Nov. 18 morning session.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tcollaborator = {Emmett, Ada and Bolick, Josh and Smith, Kevin and Rosenblum, Brian and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Alperin, Juan Pablo and Anderson, Ivy and Crow, Raym and Eve, Martin Paul and Fitzpatrick, Kathleen and Greenberg, Marc L},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {http://hdl.handle.net/1808/22153},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ley de Acceso Abierto en México: una crónica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cuadernos Fronterizos, 1(38). 2016.\n Number: 38\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Ley$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_ley_2016,\n\ttitle = {Ley de {Acceso} {Abierto} en {México}: una crónica},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2007-1248},\n\tshorttitle = {Ley de {Acceso} {Abierto} en {México}},\n\turl = {http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/cuadfront/article/view/1407},\n\tabstract = {Se recurre a la crónica narrada en primera persona para describir la participación de la autora en la formulación, discusión y redacción de las versiones preliminares de la llamada Ley de Acceso Abierto en México. Dado que se trata de un texto escrito para una revista de divulgación se recurre a un lenguaje sencillo y directo, y se evita la exposición de conceptos y descripciones analíticas, que serían más propios de un artículo para una revista de investigación.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {38},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Cuadernos Fronterizos},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {Number: 38},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Curso de capacitación: Nociones Básicas de Indización e Identificación de Revista de Ciencia.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Curso$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_curso_2016,\n\taddress = {Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez},\n\ttitle = {Curso de capacitación: {Nociones} {Básicas} de {Indización} e {Identificación} de {Revista} de {Ciencia}},\n\tvolume = {1, 2, 3 y 4},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11961/1710},\n\tabstract = {Grabación compleeta de las cinco sesiones del curso},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Repositorios de datos en el contexto de la ciencia abierta.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In XI Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinares, Imperial College London, London, UK, 2016. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Repositorios$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_repositorios_2016,\n\taddress = {Imperial College London, London, UK},\n\ttitle = {Repositorios de datos en el contexto de la ciencia abierta},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://thesocialsciences.com/assets/downloads/I16FinalProgram.pdf},\n\tabstract = {El Acceso Abierto generó un cambio radical en la comunicación científica. Actualmente emerge la discusión acerca del acceso a datos crudos: otorgamiento de datos duros como fuente de análisis.},\n\tbooktitle = {{XI} {Congreso} {Internacional} de {Ciencias} {Sociales} {Interdisciplinares}},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Retos de la producción académica en Artes y Humanidades: competencia o marginalidad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Retos$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_retos_2016,\n\taddress = {Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Argentina},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Retos de la producción académica en {Artes} y {Humanidades}: competencia o marginalidad},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/UNCUYO_Rogel_F_pdf/3205936/2},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3205936.V2},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Taller RIER-RII: Herramientas para la integración automática de producción científica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Santiago-Bautista, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Taller$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_taller_2016,\n\taddress = {Monterrey. N.L., México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Taller {RIER}-{RII}: {Herramientas} para la integración automática de producción científica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Taller_RIER/3979290},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3979290},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Nociones Básicas de Indización e Identificación de Revista de Ciencia.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Conferencia Magistral, 2016. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_nociones_2016,\n\ttitle = {Nociones {Básicas} de {Indización} e {Identificación} de {Revista} de {Ciencia}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tbooktitle = {Conferencia {Magistral}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Retos de la producción académica en Artes y Humanidades: ccompetencia o margnalidad.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Retos$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_retos_2016,\n\ttitle = {Retos de la producción académica en {Artes} y {Humanidades}: ccompetencia o margnalidad},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/UNCUYO_Rogel_F_pdf/3205936/2},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3205936.V2},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Herramientas para la integración automática de producción científica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Santiago-Bautista, I.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2016.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Herramientas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_herramientas_2016,\n\ttitle = {Herramientas para la integración automática de producción científica},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Taller_RIER/3979290},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Santiago-Bautista, Irvin},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3979290},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2015\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redes de colaboración científica en los estudios territoriales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Becerril-Tinoco, Y.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 41(123). 2015.\n Number: 123\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redes$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{becerril-tinoco_redes_2015,\n\ttitle = {Redes de colaboración científica en los estudios territoriales},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0717-6236},\n\turl = {https://eure.cl/index.php/eure/article/view/1786},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.7764/1786},\n\tabstract = {Se presenta una investigación sobre la colaboración científica en el área de los estudios territoriales. Se retoma el enfoque de la teoría de redes sociales y de sistemas complejos, ampliamente desarrollado por Loet Leydesdorff. A través de un análisis estadístico basado en fuentes como Redalyc, Scopus, Web of Science y Scielo, se muestran las pautas de colaboración en el campo de estudios territoriales y se señala que existe relación entre el incremento de la literatura de este campo y la publicación en colaboración. Finalmente se presentan los indicadores generales de producción científica de una revista de esta área temática, Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, y se contrastan los resultados con la tendencia general en América Latina. La investigación muestra que los estudios urbano-regionales constituyen un campo altamente colaborativo.},\n\tnumber = {123},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales},\n\tauthor = {Becerril-Tinoco, Yuritzi and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Number: 123},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El papel de las bibliotecas en el contexto de la ciencia abierta.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_papel_2015,\n\taddress = {Fería Internacional del Libro de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {El papel de las bibliotecas en el contexto de la ciencia abierta},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/El_papel_de_las_bibliotecas_en_el_contexto_de_la_ciencia_abierta/1618802},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1618802},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Nosotros también nos acordamos.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Tinoco García, I.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n UAEM, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Primera edición edition, 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Nosotros$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{tinoco_garcia_nosotros_2015,\n\taddress = {Toluca},\n\tedition = {Primera edición},\n\ttitle = {Nosotros también nos acordamos},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-422-626-3},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/21708},\n\tabstract = {Paul Auster, en La invención de la soledad, afirma que la memoria es el espacio en el que una cosa ocurre por segunda vez. Samuel Beckett, por su parte –refiriéndose a Proust– nos dice que “el hombre con buena memoria nunca recuerda nada, porque jamás olvida nada”. Nosotros también nos acordamos surgió como un juego que terminó por convertirse en un mecanismo de salvación. En rescate, redención, olvido y también en delirio. En el marco del programa Abril, Mes de la Lectura (2015), la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México invitó a la escritora Margo Glantz a presentar su libro "Yo también me acuerdo", editado por Sexto Piso en 2014, donde recupera la figura literaria de la anáfora para ofrecer breves acercamientos a su historia de vida relatados al azar; tal como lo hiciera Georges Perec en 1978, cuando publicó su libro "Je me souvinens" (Me acuerdo), un compendio de breves frases que inician todas con la anáfora “Me acuerdo”. Perec escribió su libro tomando como referente el que Joe Brainard publicó tres años antes –I remember (1975)– y Margo Glantz, siguiendo el mismo recurso literario, y con un gran sentido del humor, recupera el ejercicio de Perec y de Brainard y les ofrece un guiño con el título "Yo también me acuerdo"; pues al igual que ellos recopila diversas anáforas que son, al mismo tiempo, un atisbo a la memoria de una escritora consagrada y la magistral recuperación de una estrategia literaria que es tan aparentemente sencilla de construir, que invita a los lectores a liberar la memoria y también la escritura.},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tpublisher = {UAEM, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\teditor = {Tinoco García, Ivett and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tcollaborator = {Glantz, Margo},\n\tyear = {2015},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Acceso Abierto, información científica disponible en línea sin barreras.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Digital Universitaria [en línea], 16(3): 12. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Acceso$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_acceso_2015,\n\ttitle = {Acceso {Abierto}, información científica disponible en línea sin barreras},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1607-6079},\n\turl = {http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.16/num3/art19/index.html},\n\tabstract = {The purpose of this article is to define the main challenges that the Open Access movement face, as well as their advances in the world, in Latin America, but mainly in Mexico. It concludes that it is necessary to improve in the definition of a state politics that allows settling the idea of the Open Access as a commonweal.},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Revista Digital Universitaria [en línea]},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {12},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Megajournals.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Megajournals$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{rogel-salazar_megajournals_2015,\n\taddress = {Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México},\n\ttype = {Slides},\n\ttitle = {Megajournals},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Megajournals/1557911},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1557911},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Networks of scientific collaboration in territorial studies,Redes de colaboración científica en los estudios territoriales.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Becerril-Tinoco, Y.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Eure, 41(123): 311–324. 2015.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{becerril-tinoco_networks_2015,\n\ttitle = {Networks of scientific collaboration in territorial studies,{Redes} de colaboración científica en los estudios territoriales},\n\tvolume = {41},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tnumber = {123},\n\tjournal = {Eure},\n\tauthor = {Becerril-Tinoco, Yuritzi and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {311--324},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2014\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Identification of Core Journals and Analysis of Collaboration Networks Among Researchers in Ibero America.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, J.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3): eP1139. 2014.\n Number: 3 Publisher: Pacific University Libraries\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Identification$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_identification_2014,\n\ttitle = {Identification of {Core} {Journals} and {Analysis} of {Collaboration} {Networks} {Among} {Researchers} in {Ibero} {America}},\n\tvolume = {2},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2162-3309},\n\turl = {http://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.1139/},\n\tdoi = {10.7710/2162-3309.1139},\n\tabstract = {The Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication seeks to share useful innovations, both in thought and in practice, with the aim of encouraging scholarly exchange and the subsequent benefits that are borne of scrutiny, experimentation and debate. As modes of scholarly communication, the technologies and economics of publishing and the roles of libraries evolve, it is our hope that the work shared in the journal will inform practices that strengthen librarianship and that increase access to the "common Stock of Knowledge."JLSC is particularly interested in the intersection of librarianship and publishing and the resulting role of libraries in both content dissemination and content creation. Related areas of interest include new methods for the dissemination of information and information exchange; the theory and practice of the organization, use and curation of information; and issues related to the review, credentialing, reputation and impact of scholarly work.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Jesús and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {Number: 3\nPublisher: Pacific University Libraries},\n\tpages = {eP1139},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Prólogo al libro: \"La palabra electrónica, prácticas de lectura y escritura en la era digital\" de Santiago Cortés Hernández.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In La palabra electrónica, prácticas de lectura y escritura en la era digital, of Fundiciones, pages 178. FOEM, Fondo Editorial Estado de México, Toluca de Lerdo, Primera Edición edition, 2014.\n Publisher: figshare\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Prólogo$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_prologo_2014,\n\taddress = {Toluca de Lerdo},\n\tedition = {Primera Edición},\n\tseries = {Fundiciones},\n\ttitle = {Prólogo al libro: "{La} palabra electrónica, prácticas de lectura y escritura en la era digital" de {Santiago} {Cortés} {Hernández}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-495-375-6},\n\tshorttitle = {La palabra electrónica},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5028026.v1},\n\tlanguage = {Es},\n\tbooktitle = {La palabra electrónica, prácticas de lectura y escritura en la era digital},\n\tpublisher = {FOEM, Fondo Editorial Estado de México},\n\tcollaborator = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {Publisher: figshare},\n\tpages = {178},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2013\n \n \n (10)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Una métrica alternativa y comprehensiva para el análisis de la actividad científica: la metodología Redalyc-Fractal.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Becerril-García, A.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño, G.; Roca, M. Z.; Babini, D.; López López, W.; and Melero, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Una$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{aguado-lopez_metrica_2013,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\ttype = {Académica},\n\tseries = {Laboratorio de {Cienciometría} {Redalyc}-{Fractal} ({LabCrf} ®)},\n\ttitle = {Una métrica alternativa y comprehensiva para el análisis de la actividad científica: la metodología {Redalyc}-{Fractal}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/242},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Laboratorio de Cienciometría Redalyc-Fractal (LabCrf®)},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Becerril-García, Arianna and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño, Gustavo and Roca, Ma Zúñiga and Babini, Dominique and López López, Wilson and Melero, Remedios},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La presencia de las revistas de comunicación en índices internacionales: invisibilidad o una nueva forma de comunicación.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Zúñiga Roca, M. F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Memoria AMIC 2013: Democracia, Comunicación y Movimientos Sociales, Toluca, México, 2013. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_presencia_2013,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\ttitle = {La presencia de las revistas de comunicación en índices internacionales: invisibilidad o una nueva forma de comunicación},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396536},\n\tabstract = {Objetivo: Identificar la presencia de las revistas académicas de comunicación en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas (WoS y Scopus a nivel internacional, así como Latindex, Scielo y Redalyc en el ámbito Iberoamericano). Método: Se describe la participación de los títulos vigentes en 2011 por país, idioma y ámbito temático. En el caso de las revistas registradas en el Social Citation Index-Thomson Reuters (SCI-ISI) se identificó su tipo de acceso (abierto o por suscripción. Resultados: No se registra ninguna revista latinoamericana de comunicación en el SCI-ISI, su disponibilidad en acceso abierto es limitada (11.3\\%), así como también su disponibilidad en las bibliotecas analizadas, con una variación del 20 al 6\\% en los casos analizados.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Memoria {AMIC} 2013: {Democracia}, {Comunicación} y {Movimientos} {Sociales}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Zúñiga Roca, María Fernanda},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los Repositorios Federados de Institución, una propuesta de articulación de la vía verde y la vía dorada del Acceso Abierto en ALyC.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Becerril-García, A.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Costa Rica, 2013. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Los$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_repositorios_2013,\n\taddress = {Costa Rica},\n\ttitle = {Los {Repositorios} {Federados} de {Institución}, una propuesta de articulación de la vía verde y la vía dorada del {Acceso} {Abierto} en {ALyC}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {http://eprints.rclis.org/20509/1/Ponencia%2025-227-1-PB.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Becerril-García, Arianna and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El dispositivo de poder como medio de comunicación: Foucault - Luhmann.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Zamorano-Farías, R.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Política y Sociedad, 50(3): 959–980. 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{zamorano-farias_dispositivo_2013,\n\ttitle = {El dispositivo de poder como medio de comunicación: {Foucault} - {Luhmann}},\n\tvolume = {50},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1988-3129},\n\tshorttitle = {El dispositivo de poder como medio de comunicación},\n\turl = {https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/39248},\n\tdoi = {10.5209/rev_POSO.2013.v50.n3.39248},\n\tabstract = {El objetivo central de este artículo es identificar las posibles prestaciones analíticas entre dos autores cuyas propuestas teóricas parecieran distantes: Michel Foucault y Niklas Luhmann. Se analiza no sólo la forma en que opera el dispositivo/diferencia que históricamente genera rela-ciones de poder, sino también se explora cómo opera en su manifestación discursiva, en su di-ferenciación como medio de comunicación o, en la construcción de sentido como régimen dis-cursivo preguntando, en concreto ¿qué es lo que opera/comunica el poder?},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2020-08-20},\n\tjournal = {Política y Sociedad},\n\tauthor = {Zamorano-Farías, Raúl and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {959--980},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Agenda de investigación para la comunicación científica de América Latina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Alperin, J. P.; Fischman, G.; Aguado-Lopez, A.; Becerril-García, A.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Cetto, A. M.; Alonso Gamboa, O.; Chávez-Sánchez, G.; Santos, S.; and Batalha, F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2013.\n Artwork Size: 110611 Bytes Pages: 110611 Bytes\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Agenda$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{alperin_agenda_2013,\n\ttitle = {Agenda de investigación para la comunicación científica de {América} {Latina}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Agenda_de_investigaci_n_para_la_comunicaci_n_cient_fica_de_Am_rica_Latina/847295},\n\tdoi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.847295},\n\tabstract = {Agenda de investigación establecida por el grupo de trabajo del proyecto "Calidad en la Comunicación Científica Abierta de América Latina", con integrantes de FLACSO, PKP, RedALyC, SciELO, y Latindex.},\n\turldate = {2023-09-27},\n\tpublisher = {figshare},\n\tauthor = {Alperin, Juan Pablo and Fischman, Gustavo and Aguado-Lopez, Aguado and Becerril-García, Arianna and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Cetto, Ana María and Alonso Gamboa, Octavio and Chávez-Sánchez, Guillermo and Santos, Solange and Batalha, Fabio},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {Artwork Size: 110611 Bytes\nPages: 110611 Bytes},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Métricas alternativas para la producción científica en revistas de acceso abierto redalyc.org, 2005-2011.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Becerril-García, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In PKP International Scholarly Publishing Conferences, Facultad de Ciencias,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2013. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Métricas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_metricas_2013,\n\taddress = {Facultad de Ciencias,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México},\n\ttitle = {Métricas alternativas para la producción científica en revistas de acceso abierto redalyc.org, 2005-2011},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://conference.pkp.sfu.ca/index.php/pkp2013/pkp2013/paper/view/442},\n\tabstract = {El presente documento es un acercamiento a una de las primeras propuestas concretas del Laboratorio de Cienciometría redalyc.org-fractal (LabCrf ®) para la generación de métricas alternativas que buscan describir el estado de la producción científica en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redaly.org para el periodo 2005-2011. Metodología: exponer un modelo de análisis basado en entidades de producción y comunicación que aplican un conjunto de indicadores con el fin de construir el “estado del arte” para la producción científica en Iberoamérica, a partir de los Perfiles de Producción Científica que se desarrollan por país, institución y área de conocimiento. Resultados: las métricas alternativas propuestas por redalyc.org hacen visibles las contribuciones científicas del mundo en revistas iberoamericanas ‘perdidas’ en otras bases de datos, al tiempo que presentan los datos de producción y colaboración de 13,414 instituciones identificando la característica de su contribución: en publicaciones institucionales, nacionales y/o de otros países. Estas métricas alternativas permiten completar la producción regional, sobre todo en las Ciencias Sociales ya que redalyc.org cuenta con más de 500 revistas de éstas disciplinas.},\n\tbooktitle = {{PKP} {International} {Scholarly} {Publishing} {Conferences}},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Informe sobre la producción científica de la UANL en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org, 2005-2011.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Noyola-Carmona, J.; Fabela-Bernal, F.; Ledezma-Elizondo, M. T.; Marín-González, N. A.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Aguado-López, E.; Becerril-García, A.; and Leal-Arriola, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León / Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Monterrey, N.L., México, 1a Edición edition, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Informe$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{noyola-carmona_informe_2013,\n\taddress = {Monterrey, N.L., México},\n\tedition = {1a Edición},\n\ttitle = {Informe sobre la producción científica de la {UANL} en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org, 2005-2011},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-27-0178-6},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/4189},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León / Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Noyola-Carmona, Juan and Fabela-Bernal, Francisco and Ledezma-Elizondo, María Teresa and Marín-González, Nahielly Alejandra and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo and Becerril-García, Arianna and Leal-Arriola, Miguel},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Informe sobre la producción científica de Cuba y El Caribe en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rodríguez-Sánchez, Y.; Casate-Fernández, R.; Sánchez-Rojas, C.; Arencibia-Jorge, R.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Becerril-García, A.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Instituto de Información Científica y Tecnológica, Cuba, La Habana, Cuba, 1a Edición edition, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Informe$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{rodriguez-sanchez_informe_2013,\n\taddress = {La Habana, Cuba},\n\tedition = {1a Edición},\n\ttitle = {Informe sobre la producción científica de {Cuba} y {El} {Caribe} en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-959-234-091-6},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/572},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Instituto de Información Científica y Tecnológica, Cuba},\n\tauthor = {Rodríguez-Sánchez, Yaniris and Casate-Fernández, Ricardo and Sánchez-Rojas, Carmen and Arencibia-Jorge, Ricardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Informe sobre la producción científica de Argentina en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n De Volder, C.; Babini, D.; López, F. A.; Aguado López, E.; Becerril-García, A.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Arzuaga Magnoni, J. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Argentina: Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani-Universidad de Buenos …, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1a. Edición edition, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Informe$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{de_volder_informe_2013,\n\taddress = {Buenos Aires, Argentina},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\ttitle = {Informe sobre la producción científica de {Argentina} en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-950-29-1367-4},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/573},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Argentina: Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani-Universidad de Buenos …},\n\tauthor = {De Volder, Carolina and Babini, Dominique and López, Fernando Ariel and Aguado López, Eduardo and Becerril-García, Arianna and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Arzuaga Magnoni, Javier Ariel},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Informe sobre la producción científica de Costa Rica en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Jensen-Pennintong, H.; Pérez, A. L; Córdoba, S.; Polanco-Cortés, J.; Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Becerril-García, A.; and Aguirre-Pitol, M. Á.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica, 1. Edición edition, 2013.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Informe$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{jensen-pennintong_informe_2013,\n\taddress = {Costa Rica},\n\tedition = {1. Edición},\n\ttitle = {Informe sobre la producción científica de {Costa} {Rica} en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc. org 2005-2011},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-9977-15-254-7},\n\turl = {https://hdl.handle.net/10669/1415},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad de Costa Rica},\n\tauthor = {Jensen-Pennintong, Henning and Pérez, Alice L and Córdoba, Saray and Polanco-Cortés, Jorge and Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna and Aguirre-Pitol, Miguel Ángel},\n\tyear = {2013},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2012\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The need and viability of a mediation index in Latin American scientific production and publication: The case of the Redalyc System of Scientific Information.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado‐López, E.; Garduño‐Oropeza, G. A.; Rogel‐Salazar, R.; and Fernanda Zúñiga‐Roca, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Aslib Proceedings, 64(1): 8–31. January 2012.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguadolopez_need_2012,\n\ttitle = {The need and viability of a mediation index in {Latin} {American} scientific production and publication: {The} case of the {Redalyc} {System} of {Scientific} {Information}},\n\tvolume = {64},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0001-253X},\n\tshorttitle = {The need and viability of a mediation index in {Latin} {American} scientific production and publication},\n\turl = {https://zenodo.org/records/10397810},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/00012531211196684},\n\tabstract = {The purpose of this paper is to introduce the online information system Redalyc as an intermediary tool that provides Latin American scientific articles with international standards (mostly related to natural sciences and developed countries) as well as with specific areas to host local research.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach: Redalyc is based on a semantic intersection model proposed by Russian semiologist Yuri Lotman. This model allows us to visualize the role played by Redalyc as a mediator between opposites, i.e. local science versus global science, and natural sciences versus social sciences. The paper presents some of the projects Redalyc has developed in conjunction with different countries and different scientific communities.\n\nFindings: The paper describes some characteristics that local projects, similar to Redalyc, must have in order to become an intermediary between scientific journal production indexes that link global parameters for scientific communication with local production. The paper finds that efforts should not only be centered on the development of strategies to change certain inertias that distinguish local social scientific production (e.g. dependence on literary resources, lack of recognition of periodical media), but also on the way they could help these disciplines and local media overcome certain barriers, namely: normalization, language and technological handicaps.\n            \nOriginality/value: The recognition of Latin American scientific production implies a dual process that not only involves local policies (scientific councils), but also requires producing reliable databases to provide scientists and journal editors with global references on how to produce visible scientific literature and pertinent knowledge for their contexts. Redalyc is currently a database that contributes in both ways.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-10-10},\n\tjournal = {Aslib Proceedings},\n\tauthor = {Aguado‐López, Eduardo and Garduño‐Oropeza, Gustavo Adolfo and Rogel‐Salazar, Rosario and Fernanda Zúñiga‐Roca, María},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tpages = {8--31},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n De un modelo centrado en la revista a un modelo centrado en entidades: la publicación y producción científica en la nueva plataforma Redalyc.org.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Becerril-García, A.; Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño-Oropeza, G.; and Zúñiga-Roca, M. F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Aula Abierta, 40(2): 53–64. 2012.\n Publisher: España: ICE. Universidad de Oviedo\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"De$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{becerril-garcia_modelo_2012,\n\ttitle = {De un modelo centrado en la revista a un modelo centrado en entidades: la publicación y producción científica en la nueva plataforma {Redalyc}.org},\n\tvolume = {40},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0210-2773},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/11162/4191},\n\tabstract = {La presentación de información que recoja la actividad investigadora de países e instituciones ha sido liderada por índices comerciales y bases de datos que conforman lo que se conoce como 'ciencia de corriente principal'. Sin embargo, existe una necesidad latente por el uso de métricas alternativas que permitan conocer mejor las formas de comunicación científica, particularmente en la región de Iberoamérica, ya que su participación se ve sub-representada en la corriente principal. Por ello, Redalyc, como sistema de información científica regional, construyó una nueva plataforma que reconoce la contribución de todas las instituciones sin distingo y propone un modelo que expande el enfoque centrado en la revista -que venía operando- a autores, instituciones, países y áreas del conocimiento. Este modelo es descrito con la metodología Entidad-Relación de bases de datos, en el cual, cada elemento distinto actúa como una entidad con dos componentes principales: una colección y un perfil de actividad científica. Así la región cuenta con una plataforma tecnológicamente sólida y de acceso abierto que permite consultar el contenido de la producción científica del mundo en revistas Iberoamericanas (Redalyc.org) a través de una solución extensiva a las contribuciones en distintos niveles con un universo delimitado y completo.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Aula Abierta},\n\tauthor = {Becerril-García, Arianna and Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño-Oropeza, Gustavo and Zúñiga-Roca, María Fernanda},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tnote = {Publisher: España: ICE. Universidad de Oviedo},\n\tpages = {53--64},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Indicadores cientométricos RedALyC Fractal: princípios, critérios e interpretações.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Trzesniak, P.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 3ª Conferência Luso-Brasileira sobre Acesso Aberto, Gramado, Brasil, 2012. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Indicadores$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{trzesniak_indicadores_2012,\n\taddress = {Gramado, Brasil},\n\ttitle = {Indicadores cientométricos {RedALyC} {Fractal}: princípios, critérios e interpretações},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://www.academia.edu/5259365/Indicadores_cientom%C3%A9tricos_RedALyC_Fractal_princ%C3%ADpios_crit%C3%A9rios_e_interpreta%C3%A7%C3%B5es},\n\tbooktitle = {3ª {Conferência} {Luso}-{Brasileira} sobre {Acesso} {Aberto}},\n\tauthor = {Trzesniak, Piotr and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2012},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Revistas académicas de arte en bases de datos bibliográficas: disponibilidad en acceso abierto y en bibliotecas de tres instituciones mexicanas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Aguado-López, E.; Martínez-Dominguez, N.; Lujano-Vilchis, I.; and Monroy-Vilchis, T.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n El Ornitorrinco Tachado. Revista de Artes Visuales, (1): 23–43. 2012.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Revistas$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_revistas_2012,\n\ttitle = {Revistas académicas de arte en bases de datos bibliográficas: disponibilidad en acceso abierto y en bibliotecas de tres instituciones mexicanas},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://ornitorrincotachado.uaemex.mx/article/view/4616},\n\tabstract = {Objetivo: Identificar la presencia de las revistas académicas de arte en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas (WoS y Scopus a nivel internacional, así como Latindex, Scielo y Redalyc en el ámbito Iberoamericano). Método: Se describe la participación de los títulos vigentes en 2011 por país, idioma y ámbito temático. En el caso de las revistas registradas en el Arts \\& Humanities Citation Index –a\\&hci, Thomson Reuters isi– se identificó su tipo de acceso (abierto o por suscripción), así como su disponibilidad en tres bibliotecas de instituciones mexicanas vinculadas a las disciplinas artísticas: la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unam), el Centro Nacional de las Artes (cna) y la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (uaem). Resultados: No se registra ninguna revista latinoamericana de arte en el a\\&hci, su disponibilidad en acceso abierto es limitada (11.3\\%), así como también su disponibilidad en las bibliotecas analizadas, con una variación del 20 al 6\\% en los casos analizados.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {El Ornitorrinco Tachado. Revista de Artes Visuales},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo and Martínez-Dominguez, Néstor and Lujano-Vilchis, Ivonne and Monroy-Vilchis, Trinidad},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {23--43},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2011\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La visibilidad de las publicaciones científicas mediante el acceso abierto. La experiencia del Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Baca-Zapata, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Martínez Arellano, F. F., editor(s), Coloquio sobre Acceso Abierto a la información en las Bibliotecas Académicas de América Latina y el Caribe, of Sistematización de la Información Documental, pages 149–167, Ciudad de México, 2011. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_visibilidad_2011,\n\taddress = {Ciudad de México},\n\tseries = {Sistematización de la {Información} {Documental}},\n\ttitle = {La visibilidad de las publicaciones científicas mediante el acceso abierto. {La} experiencia del {Sistema} de {Información} {Científica} {Redalyc}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-02-0752-5},\n\turl = {https://ru.iibi.unam.mx/jspui/bitstream/IIBI_UNAM/L2/1/acceso_abierto_informacion.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Coloquio sobre {Acceso} {Abierto} a la información en las {Bibliotecas} {Académicas} de {América} {Latina} y el {Caribe}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Baca-Zapata, Graciela},\n\teditor = {Martínez Arellano, Filiberto Felipe},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tpages = {149--167},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mejoramiento de procesos editoriales de revistas científicas: la experiencia del sistema de información científica Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Vargas-Delgado, J. d. J.; Sierra-Sánchez, J.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, Y.; and Durán-Medina, J. F., editor(s), El EEES y la divulgación de los resultados investigadores sobre innovación docente, pages 175–192. Vision Libros, 2011.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Mejoramiento$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_mejoramiento_2011,\n\ttitle = {Mejoramiento de procesos editoriales de revistas científicas: la experiencia del sistema de información científica {Redalyc}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-84-9008-119-8},\n\turl = {https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5706008},\n\tbooktitle = {El {EEES} y la divulgación de los resultados investigadores sobre innovación docente},\n\tpublisher = {Vision Libros},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\teditor = {Vargas-Delgado, José de Jesús and Sierra-Sánchez, Javier and Rodríguez-Sánchez, Yaniris and Durán-Medina, José Francisco},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tpages = {175--192},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cooperación iberoamericana para el Acceso Abierto a revistas de Ciencias Sociales: el caso CLACSO-Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Babini, D.; López, F.; and González, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In IFLA 2011, International Federation of Library Associations, Social Science Libraries Section, Satellite Conference, Social Science Libraries: A Bridge to Knowledge for Sustainable Development, La Habana, Cuba, 2011. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Cooperación$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_cooperacion_2011,\n\taddress = {La Habana, Cuba},\n\ttitle = {Cooperación iberoamericana para el {Acceso} {Abierto} a revistas de {Ciencias} {Sociales}: el caso {CLACSO}-{Redalyc}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://hdl.handle.net/2142/25877},\n\tabstract = {Las ciencias sociales de América Latina y el Caribe contribuyen significativamente al desarrollo de nuevos conocimientos de interés para el desarrollo sustentable de la región. La difusión de esos nuevos conocimientos se ve limitada por la falta de recursos para publicar y hacer visible los resultados de investigaciones. Se presenta el caso de la alianza entre el Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) y la Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (REDALYC) para el desarrollo de una colección de revistas de ciencias sociales en acceso abierto, como estrategia que permite mejorar la visibilidad, accesibilidad y evaluación de los resultados de investigaciones. Y se describe el rol de los editores de las revista y de las bibliotecas en el desarrollo y actualización de las colecciones digitales de revistas.},\n\tbooktitle = {{IFLA} 2011, {International} {Federation} of {Library} {Associations}, {Social} {Science} {Libraries} {Section}, {Satellite} {Conference}, {Social} {Science} {Libraries}: {A} {Bridge} to {Knowledge} for {Sustainable} {Development}},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Babini, Dominique and López, Fernando and González, Jessica},\n\tyear = {2011},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc: ocho años haciendo presente la ciencia iberoamericana en el contexto de la Sociedad de la Información.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In La comunicación que necesitamos, el país que queremos, 2011. Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de las Ciencias de la Comunicación. Universidad Iberoamericana\n Publisher: Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de las Ciencias de la …\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_redalyc:_2011,\n\ttitle = {Redalyc: ocho años haciendo presente la ciencia iberoamericana en el contexto de la {Sociedad} de la {Información}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-95703-0-9},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6536/2011RedalycOchoA%c3%b1osHaciendoPresentelaCienciaIberoamericana.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y},\n\tabstract = {La comunicación que proponemos tiene como fin exponer los alcances y resultados que el proyecto Redalyc de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México ha tenido como recurso en línea de acceso abierto para la información científica producida por la región de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal. Del mismo modo expone datos sobre el impacto que como índice y gestor de la información en línea ha venido adquiriendo para convertirse en un recurso indispensable para la representación de la Ciencia Local frente a los grandes referentes internacionales o la denominada Gran corriente de la ciencia.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {La comunicación que necesitamos, el país que queremos},\n\tpublisher = {Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de las Ciencias de la Comunicación. Universidad Iberoamericana},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de las Ciencias de la …},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2010\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La experiencia de Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In De la Peña, A., editor(s), Reformar para posicionar, Memoria del IV Foro Internacional de Edición Universitaria, Feria Internacional del Libro de Guadalajara, pages 72–86, Guadalajara, Jalisco, 2010. Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_experiencia_2010,\n\taddress = {Guadalajara, Jalisco},\n\ttitle = {La experiencia de {Redalyc}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-450-468-2},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6538/2011LaExperienciadeRedalyc.pdf?sequence=3},\n\tbooktitle = {Reformar para posicionar, {Memoria} del {IV} {Foro} {Internacional} de {Edición} {Universitaria}, {Feria} {Internacional} del {Libro} de {Guadalajara}},\n\tpublisher = {Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\teditor = {De la Peña, Antonio},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tpages = {72--86},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Limites e potencialidades da avaliação científica: crítica epistemológica à cobertura de bases de dados e à construção de indicadores.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Becerril García, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Ferreira, S. M. S. P.; Targino, M. d. G. L.; and Das Graças, M., editor(s), Acessibilidade e visibilidade de revistas científicas eletrônicas, pages 213–257. Editora SENAC São Paulo : Cengage Learning, São Paulo, SP, 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Limites$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado_lopez_limites_2010,\n\taddress = {São Paulo, SP},\n\ttitle = {Limites e potencialidades da avaliação científica: crítica epistemológica à cobertura de bases de dados e à construção de indicadores},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-85-396-0035-9 978-85-221-0990-6},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6547/2010LimitesePotencialidadesdaAvaliacao.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y},\n\tlanguage = {Portugues},\n\tbooktitle = {Acessibilidade e visibilidade de revistas científicas eletrônicas},\n\tpublisher = {Editora SENAC São Paulo : Cengage Learning},\n\tauthor = {Aguado López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril García, Arianna},\n\teditor = {Ferreira, Sueli Mara Soares Pinto and Targino, Maria das Graças Leite and Das Graças, Maria},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tpages = {213--257},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Algunos comentarios y conclusiones sobre el XI Seminario de la Red de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio (RII), 28 al 30 de octubre de 2010, Mendoza, Argentina.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gudiño, M. E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Villegas, B.; and Rapali, N.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Proyección, IV(9 (Julio-Diciembre)): 14. 2010.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Algunos$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{gudino_algunos_2010,\n\ttitle = {Algunos comentarios y conclusiones sobre el {XI} {Seminario} de la {Red} de {Investigadores} sobre {Globalización} y {Territorio} ({RII}), 28 al 30 de octubre de 2010, {Mendoza}, {Argentina}},\n\tvolume = {IV},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/objetos_digitales/11228/01gudino-proyeccion9.pdf},\n\tabstract = {La Red de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio (RII), en cada nuevo encuentro realiza aportes al conocimiento sobre la relación globalización-territorio y hace efectiva su contribución a la discusión científica sobre temas de sumo interés para la comunidad de investigadores de América Latina y de Europa, como lo son el ordenamiento territorial, la planificación urbana y rural, la segregación socio-territorial, las transformaciones productivas, el rol del Estado, entre otros},\n\tlanguage = {es},\n\tnumber = {9 (Julio-Diciembre)},\n\tjournal = {Proyección},\n\tauthor = {Gudiño, María Elina and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Villegas, Beatríz and Rapali, Nadia},\n\tyear = {2010},\n\tpages = {14},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2009\n \n \n (9)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Presencia de universidades en la Red: La brecha digital entre Estados Unidos y el resto del mundo.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Becerril-García, A.; and Baca-Zapata, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 6(1). 2009.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Presencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_presencia_2009,\n\ttitle = {Presencia de universidades en la {Red}: {La} brecha digital entre {Estados} {Unidos} y el resto del mundo},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1698-580X},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Presence} of {Universities} on the {Internet}},\n\turl = {http://rusc.uoc.edu/rusc/ca/index.php/rusc/article/view/v6n1-aguado-rogel-becerril-baca.html},\n\tdoi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v6i1.18},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-09-27},\n\tjournal = {RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna and Baca-Zapata, Graciela},\n\tyear = {2009},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Elaboración de artículos científicos.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Materiales del curso: Elaboración de artículos científicos y criterios de arbitraje académico,, 2009. ANUIES, Asociación de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_elaboracion_2009,\n\ttitle = {Elaboración de artículos científicos},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tbooktitle = {Materiales del curso: {Elaboración} de artículos científicos y criterios de arbitraje académico,},\n\tpublisher = {ANUIES, Asociación de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2009},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Patrones de colaboración científica a partir de redes de coautoría.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño-Oropeza, G.; Becerril-García, A.; Zúñiga-Roca, M. F.; and Velázquez-Álvarez, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 16: 225–258. 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Patrones$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_patrones_2009,\n\ttitle = {Patrones de colaboración científica a partir de redes de coautoría},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1405-1435, 2448-5799},\n\turl = {https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10512244010},\n\tabstract = {En este artículo se ofrece un análisis de los patrones de colaboración mediante redes de coautoría para cinco revistas editadas por la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (uaem): Ciencia Ergo Sum, Contribuciones desde Coatepec, Convergencia, Papeles de Población y Quivera. Se analizan los textos publicados entre 2006 y 2007 escritos en coautoría, diferenciándolos en colaboraciones intra e inter institucionales, así como nacionales e internacionales. El análisis permitió conocer algunas características de la estructura de las redes de colaboración tanto de los autores, como de las instituciones y de los países que participan.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\turldate = {2023-10-08},\n\tjournal = {Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño-Oropeza, Gustavo and Becerril-García, Arianna and Zúñiga-Roca, María Fernanda and Velázquez-Álvarez, Alejandro},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {225--258},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Patrones de generación y consumo de información especializada en la investigación social en México.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Becerril-Tinoco, Y.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista de la Educación Superior, 38(149): 31–58. 2009.\n Publisher: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Patrones$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{becerril-tinoco_patrones_2009,\n\ttitle = {Patrones de generación y consumo de información especializada en la investigación social en {México}},\n\tvolume = {38},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0185-2760.},\n\turl = {http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista149_S1A2ES.pdf},\n\tabstract = {Este artículo se analiza los retos que implica la introducción de las tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC) en los patrones de uso y consumo de información especializada por parte de los científicos sociales en México. Se ofrece un panorama acerca de la forma en que la edición de revistas científicas ha logrado consolidarse como uno de los principales canales de comunicación entre especialistas. Posteriormente, se presentan los resultados de una investigación que buscó conocer las prácticas de generación y consumo de información, entre investigadores del área de sociología en dos universidades públicas mexicanas. Los resultados permiten concluir que existe escaso conocimiento de las herramientas electrónicas con información especializada, ello podría explicar porqué sus investigaciones se difunden en revistas locales con escasa visibilidad.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {149},\n\tjournal = {Revista de la Educación Superior},\n\tauthor = {Becerril-Tinoco, Yuritzi and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior},\n\tpages = {31--58},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las revistas multidisciplinarias como medios de exposición del trabajo en colaboración: CIENCIA ergo sum, 1999-2006.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Ergo Sum, 16(2): iv–x. 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Las$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_revistas_2009,\n\ttitle = {Las revistas multidisciplinarias como medios de exposición del trabajo en colaboración: {CIENCIA} ergo sum, 1999-2006},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1405-0269},\n\turl = {https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10411360013},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Ergo Sum},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {iv--x},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cambios de la comunicación científica Iberoamericana, el caso de Redalyc y su contribución a la visibilidad de las revistas especializadas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño Oropeza, G.; and Zúñiga, M. F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quórum: revista de pensamiento iberoamericano, (22): 149–168. 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad de Alcalá. Centro de Iniciativas de Cooperación al Desarrollo y …\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Cambios$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado_lopez_cambios_2009,\n\ttitle = {Cambios de la comunicación científica {Iberoamericana}, el caso de {Redalyc} y su contribución a la visibilidad de las revistas especializadas},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1575-4227},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/10017/11461},\n\tabstract = {Las iniciativas que se han instrumentado para aumentar la visibilidad de la producción científica de Iberoamérica están transformando la comunicación en este ámbito. Para mostrarlo se expone el caso de Redalyc, proyecto que ha contribuido a ese cambio mediante la apertura de su hemeroteca en línea. Después de cinco años de trabajo se incorporaron servicios adicionales que incluyen la generación de indicadores bibliométricos y de uso, además de módulos sobre procesos editoriales y análisis de redes sociocientíficas. Al conjunto de estos módulos se le llamó Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc (SICR), el cual permitirá obtener un panorama del conocimiento científico generado en y sobre Iberoamérica.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {22},\n\tjournal = {Quórum: revista de pensamiento iberoamericano},\n\tauthor = {Aguado López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño Oropeza, Gustavo and Zúñiga, María Fernanda},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad de Alcalá. Centro de Iniciativas de Cooperación al Desarrollo y …},\n\tpages = {149--168},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La circulación del conocimiento: la experiencia de la comunidad de estudios territoriales Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Aguado-López, E.; González-Ortiz, F.; and Zárate-De Paul, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Ánfora, 16(26). 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Manizales\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_circulacion_2009,\n\ttitle = {La circulación del conocimiento: la experiencia de la comunidad de estudios territoriales {Redalyc}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0121-6538},\n\turl = {https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=357834258012},\n\tabstract = {Se presentan los primeros pasos en la conformación de la Comunidad de Estudios Territoriales que desarrolla el Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex), en colaboración con la Red Digital de Información sobre Vivienda del Instituto del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda para los Trabajadores (Infonavit) y la Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio (RII). De igual forma, se enfatizan los posibles vínculos de trabajo colaborativo con la Red Iberoamericana de Postgrados sobre Políticas y Estudios Territoriales (RIPPET).},\n\tnumber = {26},\n\tjournal = {Revista Ánfora},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo and González-Ortiz, Felipe and Zárate-De Paul, Rodrigo},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Manizales},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc y la democratización del conocimiento.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño Oropeza, G.; Zúñiga Roca, M. F.; and Baca Zapata, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Lizcano, F.; Ripa Alsina, L.; and Salum Alvarado, E., editor(s), Democracia y derechos humanos. Desafíos para la emancipación. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes y El Colegio Mexiquense, 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_redalyc_2009,\n\ttitle = {Redalyc y la democratización del conocimiento},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-987-05-5712-8},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/68041},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Democracia y derechos humanos. {Desafíos} para la emancipación},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes y El Colegio Mexiquense},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño Oropeza, Gustavo and Zúñiga Roca, María Fernanda and Baca Zapata, Graciela},\n\teditor = {Lizcano, Francisco and Ripa Alsina, Luisa and Salum Alvarado, Elena},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La circulación del conocimiento: la experiencia de la comunidad de estudios territoriales Redalyc / Knowledge circulation: the experience of the community of territorial studies Redalyc.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; Aguado-López, E.; González-Ortiz, F.; and Zárate-De Paul, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Ánfora, 16(26). 2009.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Manizales\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_circulacion_2009,\n\ttitle = {La circulación del conocimiento: la experiencia de la comunidad de estudios territoriales {Redalyc} / {Knowledge} circulation: the experience of the community of territorial studies {Redalyc}},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tnumber = {26},\n\tjournal = {Revista Ánfora},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo and González-Ortiz, Felipe and Zárate-De Paul, Rodrigo},\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Manizales},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2008\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc: una alternativa a las asimetrías en la distribución del conocimiento científico.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Garduño-Oropeza, G.; and Zúñiga-Roca, M. F.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 19(37): 11–30. 2008.\n Publisher: Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Argentina\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_redalyc:_2008,\n\ttitle = {Redalyc: una alternativa a las asimetrías en la distribución del conocimiento científico},\n\tvolume = {19},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0327-5566},\n\turl = {http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/cdyt/n37/n37a02.pdf},\n\tabstract = {En el presente artículo se analiza el problema de la distribución asimétrica del conocimiento científico, partiendo del supuesto de que las revistas especializadas son el principal medio para la comunicación científica, por lo que a través de ellas se legitima el conocimiento. De ahí la importancia de apoyar los proyectos regionales que buscan darles visibilidad y coadyuvar a la consolidación de los procesos editoriales. El Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc (SICR) es uno de estos proyectos, que adhiere a los principios de acceso abierto para potenciar la actividad científica y tecnológica de Iberoamérica},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {37},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Garduño-Oropeza, Gustavo and Zúñiga-Roca, María Fernanda},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Argentina},\n\tpages = {11--30},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La educación en su dimensión política: un análisis crítico. Reseña del libro \"Política, poder y pupitres. Crítica al nuevo federalismo educativo\" de Carlos Ornelas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 13(39): 1287–1293. 2008.\n Publisher: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, AC\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_educacion_2008,\n\ttitle = {La educación en su dimensión política: un análisis crítico. {Reseña} del libro "{Política}, poder y pupitres. {Crítica} al nuevo federalismo educativo" de {Carlos} {Ornelas}},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1405-6666},\n\turl = {https://www.comie.org.mx/revista/v2018/rmie/index.php/nrmie/article/view/600/600},\n\tabstract = {Reseña" Política, poder y pupitres. Crítica al nuevo federalismo educativo" de Carlos Ornelas},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {39},\n\tjournal = {Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, AC},\n\tpages = {1287--1293},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Límites epistemológicos en la construcción de indicadores para evaluar las actividades científicas. Una lectura constructivista.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Osorio, F.; Arnold, M.; González-López, S.; and Aguado López, E., editor(s), La nueva teoría social en Hispanoamérica. Introducción a la teoría de sistemas constructivista, of Pensamiento Universitario, pages 121–136. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México, 1a Edición edition, 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Límites$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{rogel-salazar_limites_2008,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\tedition = {1a Edición},\n\tseries = {Pensamiento {Universitario}},\n\ttitle = {Límites epistemológicos en la construcción de indicadores para evaluar las actividades científicas. {Una} lectura constructivista},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-422-008-7},\n\turl = {https://libros.uchile.cl/files/presses/1/monographs/270/submission/proof/120/index.html},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\tbooktitle = {La nueva teoría social en {Hispanoamérica}. {Introducción} a la teoría de sistemas constructivista},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\teditor = {Osorio, Francisco and Arnold, Marcelo and González-López, Sergio and Aguado López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tpages = {121--136},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Producción científica y redes de colaboración en los procesos editoriales: el caso de Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural en sus 30 años.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Velázquez-Álvarez, A.; Erazo-Muñoz, J. P.; and López-López, W.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, (61): 11–39. 2008.\n Publisher: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Producción$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_produccion_2008,\n\ttitle = {Producción científica y redes de colaboración en los procesos editoriales: el caso de {Cuadernos} de {Desarrollo} {Rural} en sus 30 años},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2215-7727 {\\textbar} 0122-1450},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/10554/23578},\n\tabstract = {Este artículo muestra un análisis de la producción científica de la Revista Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural durante el período comprendido entre 1979 a 2008. El objetivo principal de este trabajo es observar la dinámica de la producción científica de Cuadernos a lo largo de sus treinta años de publicación continua, mostrar a través de indicadores bibliométricos y redes socio científicas el comportamiento y evolución de este proyecto editorial. La revista muestra la evolución y proceso de transición de una revista institucional y endógena a una publicación aceptada por una comunidad internacional cada vez más amplia, lo que se refleja en sus niveles de internacionalización.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {61},\n\tjournal = {Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Velázquez-Álvarez, Alejandro and Erazo-Muñoz, Janeth Patricia and López-López, Wilson},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana},\n\tpages = {11--39},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hacia la construcción de una propuesta analítica para el estudio de las redes de colaboración: CIENCIA ergo sum.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Velazquez-Álvarez, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Ergo Sum, 15(2): 199–214. 2008.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Hacia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_hacia_2008,\n\ttitle = {Hacia la construcción de una propuesta analítica para el estudio de las redes de colaboración: {CIENCIA} ergo sum},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2395-8782},\n\turl = {https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/7475},\n\tabstract = {El objetivo del trabajo es mostrar la construcción y desarrollo de una propuesta que permita el estudio de las redes de colaboración científica a partir de las revistas científicas, tomando como caso la revista CIENCIA ergo sum. Se toma el artículo como referencia para el análisis de la conformación de redes, es decir, la visualización de los mecanismos de interacción y cooperación entre investigadores provenientes de diferentes ámbitos institucionales y nacionales para la producción del conocimiento. Se analiza la producción científica en 1999 al 2006, su internacionalización y los actores inmiscuidos en ésta: países, instituciones y autores. Se concluye que las redes de colaboración a partir de las coautorías son un valioso instrumento para identificar la consolidación de un proyecto editorial y su posicionamiento dentro de la comunidad académica institucional e internacional.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Ergo Sum},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Velazquez-Álvarez, Alejandro},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {199--214},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La epistemología de la comunicación en Michel Serres.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Garduño-Oropeza, G.; Zúñiga-Roca, M. F.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de Moebio. Revista de epistemología de ciencias sociales, (31): 23–37. 2008.\n Publisher: Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{garduno-oropeza_epistemologicomunicacion_2008,\n\ttitle = {La epistemología de la comunicación en {Michel} {Serres}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0717-554X},\n\turl = {https://revistaei.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/25916},\n\tabstract = {El presente artículo pretende brindar un primer acercamiento a lo que llamaríamos una “epistemología posible de la comunicación” a partir de ciertos conceptos del pensamiento de Michel Serres. Dichos conceptos están marcados por una posición filosófica de vanguardia en donde las fronteras, límites, deslindes y competencias de las diferentes formas de conocer se diluyen en función de pliegues, dobleces y conexiones mutuas que, en cada producto cultural, ponen de manifiesto la presencia de una competencia inicial del hombre para ordenar y fundar la realidad.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {31},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de Moebio. Revista de epistemología de ciencias sociales},\n\tauthor = {Garduño-Oropeza, Gustavo and Zúñiga-Roca, María Fernanda and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.},\n\tpages = {23--37},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La nueva teoría social en hispanoamérica. Introducción a la teoría de sistemas constructivista.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Osorio Acosta, F.; Arnold, M.; González López, S.; Aguado López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2008.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@misc{osorio_acosta_nueva_2008,\n\ttitle = {La nueva teoría social en hispanoamérica. {Introducción} a la teoría de sistemas constructivista},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Osorio Acosta, Francisco and Arnold, Marcelo and González López, Sergio and Aguado López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2008},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Reseña\" Política, poder y pupitres. Crítica al nuevo federalismo educativo\" de Carlos Ornelas.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n . 2008.\n Publisher: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, AC\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_resen_2008,\n\ttitle = {Reseña" {Política}, poder y pupitres. {Crítica} al nuevo federalismo educativo" de {Carlos} {Ornelas}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, AC},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2007\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Criterios, políticas y procedimientos para la admisión, agrupación y permanencia de las revistas científicas del acervo Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n REDVET. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria, 8(12): 0. 2007.\n Publisher: Veterinaria Organización\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Criterios,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_criterios_2007,\n\ttitle = {Criterios, políticas y procedimientos para la admisión, agrupación y permanencia de las revistas científicas del acervo {Redalyc}},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1695-7504},\n\turl = {https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63681210},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {12},\n\tjournal = {REDVET. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Veterinaria Organización},\n\tpages = {0},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2006\n \n \n (6)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc OAI-PMH: the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting (protocol version 2.0).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Becerril-García, A.; and García-Flores, H. G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: metadata for knowledge and learning, pages 244–252, 2006. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_redalyc_2006,\n\ttitle = {Redalyc {OAI}-{PMH}: the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting (protocol version 2.0)},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/856},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.23106/dcmi.952108569},\n\tabstract = {With the arrival of the new communication systems and the “disappearance” of the borderlines, new challenges emerged to scientific production and spreading. We recognized that great part of that production was unknown and its area of influence is limited. We stated what we already knew, that social sciences were under-represented in databases that determined “the great current of science” and that Latin American scientific journals would hardly enter the legitimized databases. The adoption of the Dublin Core format in Redalyc - that administers a wide database of arbitrated scientific articles of and on Ibero-America it has required to analyze the structure of metadata, in order to implement the protocol OAI-PMH, to fortify the search, recovery and indexing the database through harvesters and search engines over the Internet by making all the articles of its collection available, facing the challenge to give visibility to the Ibero- American scientific production.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on {Dublin} {Core} and {Metadata} {Applications}: metadata for knowledge and learning},\n\tpublisher = {Dublin Core Metadata Initiative},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna and García-Flores, Honorio García},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tpages = {244--252},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc, la hemeroteca científica en línea en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Becerril-García, A.; García-Flores, H. G.; and Arriaga-Álvarez, E. G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Psicored, Comunal 2006, Oaxaca, México, 2006. Conacyt\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_redalyc_2006,\n\taddress = {Oaxaca, México},\n\ttitle = {Redalyc, la hemeroteca científica en línea en {Ciencias} {Sociales} y {Humanidades}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396527},\n\tabstract = {El proyecto Redalyc (http://redalyc.uaemex..mx) es una hemeroteca virtual, que ofrece el texto completo de cientos de revistas publicadas en América Latina y El Caribe, España y Portugal, con la intención de aumentar la visibilidad y disponibilidad del conocimiento producido, permitiendo la libre interacción entre los diversos actores encargados de la producción de conocimiento: investigadores, editores, bibliotecas, centros de información, universidades y centro de investigación entre otros.},\n\tbooktitle = {Psicored, {Comunal} 2006},\n\tpublisher = {Conacyt},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Becerril-García, Arianna and García-Flores, Honorio García and Arriaga-Álvarez, Emilio Gerardo},\n\tyear = {2006},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El proyecto Redalyc: una hemeroteca virtual para Latinoamérica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In 4o Simposio Internacional de Bibliotecas Digitales. Información digital al servicio de la sociedad, pages 404–420, 2006. Universidad de Málaga, España\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_proyecto_2006,\n\ttitle = {El proyecto {Redalyc}: una hemeroteca virtual para {Latinoamérica}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396523},\n\tbooktitle = {4o {Simposio} {Internacional} de {Bibliotecas} {Digitales}. {Información} digital al servicio de la sociedad},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad de Málaga, España},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tpages = {404--420},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El centralismo del federalismo descentralizado en México.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Restrepo Botero, D. I., editor(s), Historias de descentralización: transformación del régimen político y cambio en el modelo de desarrollo América Latina, Europa y EUA, pages 99–136. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 1a Edición edition, 2006.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{restrepo_botero_centralismo_2006,\n\taddress = {Bogotá},\n\tedition = {1a Edición},\n\ttitle = {El centralismo del federalismo descentralizado en {México}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-958-701-734-2},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10393719},\n\tlanguage = {spa},\n\tbooktitle = {Historias de descentralización: transformación del régimen político y cambio en el modelo de desarrollo {América} {Latina}, {Europa} y {EUA}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Nacional de Colombia},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Restrepo Botero, Darío Indalecio},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tpages = {99--136},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc: Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Un balance a tres años de camino.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Babini, D.; and Fraga, J., editor(s), Edición electrónica, bibliotecas virtuales y portales para las ciencias sociales en América Latina y el Caribe, pages 209–233. CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1a. Edición edition, 2006.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc:$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_redalyc:_2006,\n\taddress = {Buenos Aires, Argentina},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\ttitle = {Redalyc: {Red} de {Revistas} {Científicas} de {América} {Latina}, el {Caribe}, {España} y {Portugal} {Un} balance a tres años de camino},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {987-1183-53-4},\n\turl = {https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20100528035759/11Aguado.pdf},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Edición electrónica, bibliotecas virtuales y portales para las ciencias sociales en {América} {Latina} y el {Caribe}},\n\tpublisher = {CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Babini, Dominique and Fraga, Jorge},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tpages = {209--233},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El reto de las revistas culturales en Iberoamérica.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Exégesis. Revista de Revistas, 19(54-55): 163–168. 2006.\n Publisher: Universidad de Puerto Rico en Humacao, Puerto Rico\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_reto_2006,\n\ttitle = {El reto de las revistas culturales en {Iberoamérica}},\n\tvolume = {19},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/6524},\n\tabstract = {Gran parte de las revistas editadas en América latina y El Caribe se caracterizan por el poco impacto en la comunidad internacional, esta subrepresentadas en las principales base de datos y sistemas informaticos, y permanecen en un círculo vicioso: por el hecho de no ser citadas no están en los índices de citación y como no están en los índices de citación no son citadas, por lo que gran parte de la investigación latinoamericana podría catalogarse como ciencia perdida.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {54-55},\n\tjournal = {Exégesis. Revista de Revistas},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2006},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad de Puerto Rico en Humacao, Puerto Rico},\n\tpages = {163--168},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2005\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Red ALyC: la Hemeroteca Científica en línea en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; García, A. B.; and Flores, H. G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Actas de las V Jornadas de Bibliotecas Digitales, pages 81–86, 2005. Thomson-Paraninfo\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_red_2005,\n\ttitle = {Red {ALyC}: la {Hemeroteca} {Científica} en línea en {Ciencias} {Sociales} y {Humanidades}},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tbooktitle = {Actas de las {V} {Jornadas} de {Bibliotecas} {Digitales}},\n\tpublisher = {Thomson-Paraninfo},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and García, Arianna Becerril and Flores, Honorio García},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tpages = {81--86},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Peter M. Ward. México megaciudad: desarrollo y política 1970-2002: México: Grupo Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa/El Colegio Mexiquense (2004).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n EURE (Santiago), 31(92): 134–136. 2005.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Peter$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_peter_2005,\n\ttitle = {Peter {M}. {Ward}. {México} megaciudad: desarrollo y política 1970-2002: {México}: {Grupo} {Editorial} {Miguel} Ángel {Porrúa}/{El} {Colegio} {Mexiquense} (2004).},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0250-7161},\n\tshorttitle = {Peter {M}. {Ward}. {México} megaciudad},\n\turl = {https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0250-71612005009200009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en},\n\tdoi = {10.4067/S0250-71612005009200009},\n\tnumber = {92},\n\turldate = {2018-06-05},\n\tjournal = {EURE (Santiago)},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tpages = {134--136},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Calidad, visibilidad y disponibilidad de las revistas científicas en Iberoamérica en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades: el proyecto Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Chávez-Ávila, S.; and Becerril-García, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Revista Digital Universitaria, 6(2): 2–23. 2005.\n Publisher: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Calidad,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_calidad_2005,\n\ttitle = {Calidad, visibilidad y disponibilidad de las revistas científicas en {Iberoamérica} en {Ciencias} {Sociales} y {Humanidades}: el proyecto {Redalyc}},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {1067-6079},\n\turl = {https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/calidad-visibilidad-y-disponibilidad-de-las-revistas-cientificas-en-iberoamerica-5041141},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Revista Digital Universitaria},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Chávez-Ávila, Salvador and Becerril-García, Arianna},\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México},\n\tpages = {2--23},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2004\n \n \n (8)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España Portugal (Redalyc).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Sandoval Forero, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Coloquio de Investigación, 2004, 2004. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Red$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_red_2004,\n\ttitle = {Red de {Revistas} {Científicas} de {América} {Latina} y el {Caribe}, {España} {Portugal} ({Redalyc})},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10393741},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10393741},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Coloquio de {Investigación}, 2004},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Sandoval Forero, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2004},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los laberintos de la descentralización educativa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Gernika - UAEMEX, México, 1a edition, 2004.\n Pages: 447 Publication Title: Gernika (Ciencias Políticas)\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Los$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@book{rogel-salazar_laberintos_2004,\n\taddress = {México},\n\tedition = {1a},\n\ttitle = {Los laberintos de la descentralización educativa},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {970-637-132-X},\n\turl = {10.5281/zenodo.10278256},\n\tabstract = {Este estudio aborda la descentralización como un fenómeno que configura la pluralidad, empleando la metáfora del laberinto para explorar sus manifestaciones, particularmente en el ámbito de la descentralización educativa en México, con enfoque en la educación básica. La investigación se divide en dos secciones: un análisis conceptual y la aplicación de este enfoque al caso específico del Estado de México.\n\nEl propósito central es proporcionar un conjunto de estrategias para examinar la descentralización educativa, destacando la complejidad de este proceso dinámico y plural. Se utiliza una cartografía conceptual para explorar categorías taxonómicas y analizar cómo diversos discursos atribuyen obstáculos o posibilidades a la descentralización. La taxonomía resultante abarca categorías proyectuales, representacionales, gestionales y territoriales.\n\nEl análisis teórico destaca siete contribuciones fundamentales, como la adopción de una perspectiva transdisciplinaria y el reconocimiento del lenguaje político como un factor crucial. Se enfoca en el territorio como soporte y considera la descentralización como parte de cambios en la organización del territorio, reconociendo que la descentralización es un proceso dinámico que no corresponde a un solo discurso.\n\nLa segunda parte del estudio se centra en la descentralización educativa en el Estado de México, destacando su complejidad debido a características únicas en términos económicos, políticos y sociales. Se revela que, en este contexto, la descentralización no descentraliza la toma de decisiones educativas, sino más bien la administración y financiamiento, generando desafíos significativos, especialmente en la transferencia de fondos para el gasto educativo en las entidades.\n\nLa investigación resalta las contradicciones y desafíos inherentes a la descentralización educativa, ofreciendo un enfoque analítico novedoso y proponiendo categorías taxonómicas para comprender mejor este fenómeno en el contexto mexicano, específicamente en el Estado de México.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tpublisher = {Gernika - UAEMEX},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tnote = {Pages: 447\nPublication Title: Gernika (Ciencias Políticas)},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n

\n Este estudio aborda la descentralización como un fenómeno que configura la pluralidad, empleando la metáfora del laberinto para explorar sus manifestaciones, particularmente en el ámbito de la descentralización educativa en México, con enfoque en la educación básica. La investigación se divide en dos secciones: un análisis conceptual y la aplicación de este enfoque al caso específico del Estado de México. El propósito central es proporcionar un conjunto de estrategias para examinar la descentralización educativa, destacando la complejidad de este proceso dinámico y plural. Se utiliza una cartografía conceptual para explorar categorías taxonómicas y analizar cómo diversos discursos atribuyen obstáculos o posibilidades a la descentralización. La taxonomía resultante abarca categorías proyectuales, representacionales, gestionales y territoriales. El análisis teórico destaca siete contribuciones fundamentales, como la adopción de una perspectiva transdisciplinaria y el reconocimiento del lenguaje político como un factor crucial. Se enfoca en el territorio como soporte y considera la descentralización como parte de cambios en la organización del territorio, reconociendo que la descentralización es un proceso dinámico que no corresponde a un solo discurso. La segunda parte del estudio se centra en la descentralización educativa en el Estado de México, destacando su complejidad debido a características únicas en términos económicos, políticos y sociales. Se revela que, en este contexto, la descentralización no descentraliza la toma de decisiones educativas, sino más bien la administración y financiamiento, generando desafíos significativos, especialmente en la transferencia de fondos para el gasto educativo en las entidades. La investigación resalta las contradicciones y desafíos inherentes a la descentralización educativa, ofreciendo un enfoque analítico novedoso y proponiendo categorías taxonómicas para comprender mejor este fenómeno en el contexto mexicano, específicamente en el Estado de México.\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La recuperación del observador en la construcción del dato: una lectura constructivista.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado López, E.; and Rogel Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Osorio, F., editor(s), Ensayos sobre socioautopoiesis y epistemología constructivista, pages 194–215. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, 1a edition, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado_lopez_recuperacion_2004,\n\taddress = {Santiago de Chile},\n\tedition = {1a},\n\ttitle = {La recuperación del observador en la construcción del dato: una lectura constructivista},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/6643},\n\tbooktitle = {Ensayos sobre socioautopoiesis y epistemología constructivista},\n\tpublisher = {Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile},\n\tauthor = {Aguado López, Eduardo and Rogel Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Osorio, Francisco},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tpages = {194--215},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las indefiniciones de la descentraliación sectorial, el caso del sistema educativo mexicano.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel Salazar, R.; and Aguado López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cadernos IPPUR, XVIII(1 e 2): 209–247. 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Las$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel_salazar_indefiniciones_2004,\n\ttitle = {Las indefiniciones de la descentraliación sectorial, el caso del sistema educativo mexicano},\n\tvolume = {XVIII},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0103-1988},\n\turl = {http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/6526},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {1 e 2},\n\tjournal = {Cadernos IPPUR},\n\tauthor = {Rogel Salazar, Rosario and Aguado López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tpages = {209--247},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Legitimación del conocimiento: el caso de las revistas en ciencias sociales.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Sandoval Forero, E.; Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Castillo-Pérez, N. M., editor(s), Desarrollo científico, tecnológico y educación superior en América Latina. Un enfoque global para y desde América Latina, of Educación y Sociedad. Siglo XXI, pages 229–245. Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas y Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería de Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua, 1a. Edición edition, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Legitimación$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{sandoval_forero_legitimacion_2004,\n\taddress = {Managua, Nicaragua},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\tseries = {Educación y {Sociedad}. {Siglo} {XXI}},\n\ttitle = {Legitimación del conocimiento: el caso de las revistas en ciencias sociales},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {970-94013-3-5},\n\tshorttitle = {Desarrollo científico, tecnológico y educación superior en {América} {Latina}},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6613/2004LegitimaciondelConocimiento.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Desarrollo científico, tecnológico y educación superior en {América} {Latina}. {Un} enfoque global para y desde {América} {Latina}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas y Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería de Nicaragua},\n\tauthor = {Sandoval Forero, Eduardo and Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Castillo-Pérez, Nydia M.},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tpages = {229--245},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Educación, escuela y construcción de la sexualidad en grupos indígenas.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Educación y Ciencia (nueva época), 8(15 (29)): 27–43. 2004.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Educación,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_educacion_2004,\n\ttitle = {Educación, escuela y construcción de la sexualidad en grupos indígenas},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0188-3364},\n\turl = {http://educacionyciencia.org/index.php/educacionyciencia/article/view/210/pdf},\n\tabstract = {Este trabajo analiza la construcción de la identidad e imaginario sexual a través de la aplicación de dos mil  ejercicios  de  competencias  básicas,  aplicados  a  niños  de  sexto  grado  de  primaria  de  la  región  mazahua  del  estado  de  México.  En  dichos  ejercicios,  los  niños  escribieron  y  narraron  sus  concepciones  acerca  de:  ¿cómo  conciben  la  violación?  ¿cuáles  son  las  condiciones  ‘exigidas’  para  que  una  acción  sea  considerada  violación?  Ante una agresión sexual ¿cómo ‘distribuyen’ la culpa ante el ‘agresor(a)’ y ‘agredido(a)’? ¿cómo se distribuyen ‘derechos’ y ‘responsabilidades’ entre hombres y mujeres? ¿cómo se asigna y ‘maneja’ la culpa? Paralelo a ello, se  realizaron  diversos  grupos  de  discusión  con  maestros,  autoridades  y  alumnos,  en  torno  a  los  contenidos  axiológicos –respecto a sexualidad– incluidos en los libros de sexto grado de primaria. Este trabajo deriva de la investigación Federalismo y descentralización de la educación en México financiada por la Fundación Ford, bajo la  coordinación  general  de  Carlos  Ornelas  y  desarrollada  en  diez  entidades  de  la  República  Mexicana;  en  cuyo  marco se aplicaron 20 mil ejercicios de competencias sobre valores, salud, comunicación y uso funcional de las matemáticas, así como 150 grupos de discusión con diversos actores involucrados en el proceso educativo.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {15 (29)},\n\tjournal = {Educación y Ciencia (nueva época)},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán},\n\tpages = {27--43},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La evaluación de la calidad educativa en México: los límites de un concepto.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Mejía-Reyes, P., editor(s), La economía del estado de México: hacia una agenda de investigación. El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C., Zinacantepec, México, 1a. Edición edition, 2004.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_evaluacion_2004,\n\taddress = {Zinacantepec, México},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\ttitle = {La evaluación de la calidad educativa en {México}: los límites de un concepto},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {907-669-070-0},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6614/2004LaEvaluaciondelaCalidadEducativa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {La economía del estado de {México}: hacia una agenda de investigación},\n\tpublisher = {El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C.},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Mejía-Reyes, Pablo},\n\tyear = {2004},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Redalyc, la hemeroteca en línea en ciencias sociales http://www.redalyc.com.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Chávez, S.; Sandoval-Forero, E. A.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Ergo-Sum, 11(1): 112–113. 2004.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Redalyc,$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_redalyc_2004,\n\ttitle = {Redalyc, la hemeroteca en línea en ciencias sociales http://www.redalyc.com},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2395-8782},\n\turl = {https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/7924},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Ergo-Sum},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Chávez, Salvador and Sandoval-Forero, Eduardo Andrés and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {112--113},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2003\n \n \n (4)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los laberintos de la descentralización educativa [The labyrinths of educational decentralisation].\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, Dissertation, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico City, Ciudad de México, 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Los$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@phdthesis{rogel-salazar_laberintos_2003,\n\taddress = {Ciudad de México},\n\ttype = {{PhD} {Thesis}},\n\ttitle = {Los laberintos de la descentralización educativa [{The} labyrinths of educational decentralisation]},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://repositorio.xoc.uam.mx/jspui/handle/123456789/1305},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tschool = {Dissertation, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico City},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2003},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Ciencia perdida y divulgación del conocimiento: el proyecto Redalyc.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Chávez-Ávila, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Oaxaca, población en el Siglo XX. Revista de la Dirección General de Población de Oaxaca, 3(9): 46–47. 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Ciencia$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_ciencia_2003,\n\ttitle = {Ciencia perdida y divulgación del conocimiento: el proyecto {Redalyc}},\n\tvolume = {3},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tshorttitle = {Oaxaca, población en el {Siglo} {XX}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396531},\n\tnumber = {9},\n\tjournal = {Oaxaca, población en el Siglo XX. Revista de la Dirección General de Población de Oaxaca},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Chávez-Ávila, Salvador},\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tpages = {46--47},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The Labyrinths of the City: A Guided Visit to Make a Journey Around Different Interpretations of the City.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Ergo-Sum, 10(1): 5–17. 2003.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"The$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_labyrinths_2003,\n\ttitle = {The {Labyrinths} of the {City}: {A} {Guided} {Visit} to {Make} a {Journey} {Around} {Different} {Interpretations} of the {City}},\n\tvolume = {10},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2395-8782},\n\turl = {https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/7854},\n\tabstract = {This paper proposes a way to finda  common  ground  in  differentinterpretations of what a city is. In general, itis not a theory explaining the patterns andproblems of a city; neither does it makereference to any city in particular. Its onlypurpose  is  to  find  meaning  within  distinctinterpretations of what a city is.  I apply themetaphor of the labyrinth as a strategy foranalysing different ways (‘classical’, ‘arboreal’and ‘rhizomic’) of  perceiving a city. This ideais an analogy for a tour in search of ‘sense’and thus, is a metaphor for the same humanactivity. These thoughts are not a ‘copy’ ofwhat a  city is, but a map of the diverse pathsthat allow us to interpret the city in differentways. I attempt to analyse the city from anabstract level that allows us to realise a‘fragmentation of  meaning’ beyond the city’sforms of organisation and the objectivesassigned to it.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Ergo-Sum},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {5--17},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Calidad o exclusión: las nuevas dimensiones de la desigualdad educativa.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Mejía-Reyes, P., editor(s), La economía del Estado de México en el nuevo contecto del siglo XXI, pages 525–561. Gobierno del Estado de México, Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico y, El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C., Toluca, México, 1a. Edición edition, 2003.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Calidad$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_calidad_2003,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\ttitle = {Calidad o exclusión: las nuevas dimensiones de la desigualdad educativa},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {9780-669-059-X},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/6615/2003CalidadoExclusion.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {La economía del {Estado} de {México} en el nuevo contecto del siglo {XXI}},\n\tpublisher = {Gobierno del Estado de México, Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico y, El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C.},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Mejía-Reyes, Pablo},\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tpages = {525--561},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2002\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n Efectos de la descentralización educativa en México: Una mirada a partir de la percepción de los padres de familia.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ornelas, C.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; Aguado López, E.; and Zárate-De Paul, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Memorias del Foro Interno de Investigación Educativa, Toluca, México, 2002. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{ornelas_efectos_2002,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\ttitle = {Efectos de la descentralización educativa en {México}: {Una} mirada a partir de la percepción de los padres de familia},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396533},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Memorias del {Foro} {Interno} de {Investigación} {Educativa}},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tauthor = {Ornelas, Carlos and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado López, Eduardo and Zárate-De Paul, Rodrigo},\n\tyear = {2002},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las indefiniciones de la descentralización territorial, el caso del sistema educativo mexicano.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Castagna, A.; Raposo, I.; and Woelflin, M. L., editor(s), Globalización y Territorio. VI Seminario Internacional de la Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio, pages 213–228, Rosario, Argentina, 2002. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Escuela de Economía\n Meeting Name: Seminario Internacional, Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Las$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{rogel-salazar_indefiniciones_2002,\n\taddress = {Rosario, Argentina},\n\ttitle = {Las indefiniciones de la descentralización territorial, el caso del sistema educativo mexicano},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-950-673-347-6},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10393686},\n\tbooktitle = {Globalización y {Territorio}. {VI} {Seminario} {Internacional} de la {Red} {Iberoamericana} de {Investigadores} sobre {Globalización} y {Territorio}},\n\tpublisher = {Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Escuela de Economía},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Castagna, Alicia and Raposo, Isabel and Woelflin, María Lidia},\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tnote = {Meeting Name: Seminario Internacional, Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio},\n\tpages = {213--228},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La recuperación del observador en la construcción del dato. Una lectura constructivista.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (13): 2–20. 2002.\n Publisher: Universidad de Chile\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_recuperacion_2002,\n\ttitle = {La recuperación del observador en la construcción del dato. {Una} lectura constructivista},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/26545/27977},\n\tabstract = {Si bien en las últimas décadas se ha hecho énfasis en las ciencias sociales como disciplinas interpretativas,  no  por  hecho  han  dejado  de  realizarse  —y  en  algunos  casos  consolidarse—  las  investigaciones  de  corte  cuantitativo,  en  este  sentido  consideramos  de  primera  importancia  recuperar  la  discusión  sobre  el  problema  de  la  medición,  pero  ahora bajo una perspectiva constructivista que no considera a la investigación cualitativa en oposición permanente a  la  cuantitativa  y  viceversa,  ya  que  se  parte  de  que  el  problema  nuclear  no  es  el  ‘dato’,  sino  el  problema  de  su  construcción. En este sentido se busca abordar el papel y construcción del ‘dato’ en su vertiente de construcciones analíticas,  tan  abstractas  como  las  cualitativas.  En  síntesis,  el  problema  es  si  la  primera  persona,  en  singular  o  plural,  forma  parte  del  llamado  conocimiento.  En  tanto  que  la  respuesta  que  asumimos  es  positiva,  es  necesario  argumentar  y  exponer  las  razones  que  nos  llevan  a  dicha  conclusión  y  reiniciar  la  discusión  acerca  de  las  implicaciones en el plano metodológico, técnico y de construcción del discurso en las ciencias sociales.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {13},\n\tjournal = {Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad de Chile},\n\tpages = {2--20},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2001\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n La recuperación del observador en la reconstrucción del dato: Una perspectiva constructivista.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Ponencia presentada en el XXIII, Congreso de la Asociación Latino-Americana de Sociología, Guatemala, Ciudad Antigua, Guatemala, volume 29, 2001. \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@inproceedings{aguado-lopez_recuperacion_2001,\n\ttitle = {La recuperación del observador en la reconstrucción del dato: {Una} perspectiva constructivista},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tbooktitle = {Ponencia presentada en el {XXIII}, {Congreso} de la {Asociación} {Latino}-{Americana} de {Sociología}, {Guatemala}, {Ciudad} {Antigua}, {Guatemala}},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {2001},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n En búsqueda de un nuevo \"contrato natural\": el empleo de una estrategia de desmontaje analítico de la cuestión ambiental.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R. R.; and Aguado-López, E. A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Territorios, (5): 91–113. 2001.\n Publisher: Universidad del Rosario\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"En$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_en_2001,\n\ttitle = {En búsqueda de un nuevo "contrato natural": el empleo de una estrategia de desmontaje analítico de la cuestión ambiental},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0123-8418, 2215-7484},\n\tshorttitle = {En búsqueda de un nuevo "contrato natural"},\n\turl = {https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/territorios/article/view/5644/3775},\n\tabstract = {El trabajo que se presenta ofrece un lectura de diversas perspectivas que abordan la cuestión ambiental desde un plano epistemológico, que permita identificar el sistema conceptual que ha concebido los problemas ecológicos como "perturbaciones" y que ahora arriba a una postura denominada "desarrollo sustentable", como nueva construcción utópica del proyecto de la modernidad.\nSostenemos que la visión moderna de la ciencia, que tenía como empresa fundamental la objetividad y exactitud, se vio en la necesidad de separar al observador de lo observado y al hombre de la naturaleza, transformando con ello a la ciencia en una actividad meramente instrumental y tecnológica.\nLas reflexiones que se derivan de este análisis nos permiten argumentar que ha sido la manera cómo vemos las cosas, la forma en que hemos planteado nuestras preguntas, lo que ha circunscrito las catástrofes ecológicas a efectos perversos "no deseados" de un modelo de desarrollo; siendo que es la forma de razonar y conocer lo que ha derivado en una depredación innecesaria. Todo ello nos lleva a reconocer lo imperioso de reiniciar la discusión sobre el establececimiento de un contrato natural por encima del contrato social pactado a inicio de la modernidad.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2023-10-06},\n\tjournal = {Territorios},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario Rogel and Aguado-López, Eduardo Aguado},\n\tyear = {2001},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad del Rosario},\n\tpages = {91--113},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 2000\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Los desplazamientos en el discurso ecológico: del naturalismo social al sociologismo natural.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Aguado-López, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (22). 2000.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Los$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_desplazamientos_2000,\n\ttitle = {Los desplazamientos en el discurso ecológico: del naturalismo social al sociologismo natural},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2448-5799.},\n\turl = {https://convergencia.uaemex.mx/article/view/1838},\n\tabstract = {Este ensayo ofrece una introducción al desarrollo sustentable que permita, en la medida de lo posible, fomentar una actitud crítica ante la manera en que se analiza hoy la cuestión de la sustentabilidad. El hilo conductor es la búsqueda del sistema con ceptual, que ha concebido los problemas ecológicos como “perturbaciones” y que ahora arriba a una postura\ndenominada “desarrollo sustentable”, como nueva construcción utópica del proyecto de la modernidad. Se busca enmarcar el problema como una cuestión epistémica, debido a que ha sido la forma de razonar/conocer lo que ha circunscrito las catástrofes ecológicas a ‘perturbaciones’; es decir, a\nsituaciones a controlar, lo que da pie a la idea de desarrollo sustentable. En síntesis, estas líneas proponen enfrentar el problema de la intervención e interpretación del sujeto en la construcción de proyectos colectivos, en los que se ha ubicado al desarrollo sustentable.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {22},\n\tjournal = {Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Aguado-López, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {2000},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1999\n \n \n (2)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La contribución de la educación a la justicia social: una ilusión fragmentada.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Civera-Cerecedo, A., editor(s), Experiencias educativas en el estado de México, un recorrido histórico, of Historia-Coediciones, pages 525–561. Secretaría de Educación, CEAPE, El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C., Toluca, México, 1a. Edición edition, 1999.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_contribucion_1999,\n\taddress = {Toluca, México},\n\tedition = {1a. Edición},\n\tseries = {Historia-{Coediciones}},\n\ttitle = {La contribución de la educación a la justicia social: una ilusión fragmentada},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-607-7761-45-7},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/repositorio/handle/20.500.11799/6631},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tbooktitle = {Experiencias educativas en el estado de {México}, un recorrido histórico},\n\tpublisher = {Secretaría de Educación, CEAPE, El Colegio Mexiquense, A.C.},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\teditor = {Civera-Cerecedo, Alicia},\n\tyear = {1999},\n\tpages = {525--561},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La recuperación del sujeto en la construcción del dato.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Quivera. Revista de Estudios Territoriales, 2(2): 69–86. 1999.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México / Plaza y Valdés\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_recuperacion_1999,\n\ttitle = {La recuperación del sujeto en la construcción del dato},\n\tvolume = {2},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\turl = {https://quivera.uaemex.mx/article/view/10939/8851},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Quivera. Revista de Estudios Territoriales},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1999},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México / Plaza y Valdés},\n\tpages = {69--86},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1998\n \n \n (3)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Una propuesta para leer distintas interpretaciones de la ciudad (1a. Parte).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Diseño y Sociedad, (9): 41–54. 1998.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Una$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_propuesta_1998,\n\ttitle = {Una propuesta para leer distintas interpretaciones de la ciudad (1a. {Parte})},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0188-7025},\n\turl = {https://disenoysociedadojs.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/disenoysociedad/article/view/119},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {9},\n\tjournal = {Diseño y Sociedad},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1998},\n\tpages = {41--54},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Una propuesta para leer distintas interpretaciones de la ciudad (2a. Parte).\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Diseño y Sociedad, (9): 48–54. 1998.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Una$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_propuesta_1998,\n\ttitle = {Una propuesta para leer distintas interpretaciones de la ciudad (2a. {Parte})},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {0188-7025},\n\turl = {https://disenoysociedadojs.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/disenoysociedad/article/view/120},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {9},\n\tjournal = {Diseño y Sociedad},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1998},\n\tpages = {48--54},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n La educación básica en un municipio metropolitano: Presentación de un diagnóstico y urgencia de actuación.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (16). 1998.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"La$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_educacion_1998,\n\ttitle = {La educación básica en un municipio metropolitano: {Presentación} de un diagnóstico y urgencia de actuación},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2448-5799},\n\turl = {https://convergencia.uaemex.mx/article/view/9567},\n\tabstract = {Reseña del libro “Diagnóstico de la educación básica en Naucalpan de Juárez.Hacia una propuesta de planeación mi cro-re gional" de Eduardo Aguado y Nelson Arteaga (1996)},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {16},\n\tjournal = {Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1998},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1997\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El conocimiento relevante y el desarrollo científico y tecnológico.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ciencia Ergo-Sum, 4(3): 341–350. 1997.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{rogel-salazar_conocimiento_1997,\n\ttitle = {El conocimiento relevante y el desarrollo científico y tecnológico},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2395-8782},\n\turl = {https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/7141},\n\tabstract = {Este ensayo analiza el desarrollo científico y tecnológico en el ámbito de la educación, donde la aparición de conocimientos nuevos y cualitativamente diferentes, la aparición de nuevas ocupaciones, así como de estructuras ocupacionales diferentes, y la consiguiente caducidad de determinados tipos de conocimientos, ocupaciones y profesiones, nos obligan a reconsiderar las relaciones existentes entre el nivel y el tipo de tecnología productiva.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Ciencia Ergo-Sum},\n\tauthor = {Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {341--350},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1995\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Las áreas geoestadísticas básicas: reciente alternativa a los estudios sociales de base territorial.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; Rogel-Salazar, R.; and Dirat-Blanc, A.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Sandoval-Forero, E., editor(s), Cuestión regional: estudios y reflexiones, of Colección Xinantécatl, pages 57–93. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México y Universidad de Cauca, 1995.\n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"Las$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@incollection{aguado-lopez_areas_1995,\n\tseries = {Colección {Xinantécatl}},\n\ttitle = {Las áreas geoestadísticas básicas: reciente alternativa a los estudios sociales de base territorial},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tisbn = {978-968-835-278-6},\n\turl = {http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/6636},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tbooktitle = {Cuestión regional: estudios y reflexiones},\n\tpublisher = {Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México y Universidad de Cauca},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario and Dirat-Blanc, Antoine},\n\teditor = {Sandoval-Forero, Eduardo},\n\tyear = {1995},\n\tpages = {57--93},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n 1993\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n El analfabetismo a fin del milenio.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Aguado-López, E.; and Rogel-Salazar, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 1(3): 197–244. 1993.\n Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n \n $\"El$ Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 2 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

@article{aguado-lopez_analfabetismo_1993,\n\ttitle = {El analfabetismo a fin del milenio},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tcopyright = {Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional},\n\tissn = {2448-5799},\n\turl = {https://convergencia.uaemex.mx/article/view/10238},\n\tabstract = {Actualmente, en la mayoría de las revistas especializadas es común encontrar temáticas asociadas con la próxima integración económica de México, Estados Unidos y Canadá mediante el TLC. Cuando se aborda la cuestión educativa, la discusión se centra en la evaluación de las instituciones de educación superior y su vinculación con la industria, la calidad y la relevancia de la educación, etcétera.\n\nPor lo que se refiere a la educación básica, generalmente se enfatizan algunos aspectos de la desigualdad en los resultados obtenidos. Sin embargo, algunas situaciones más comunes han sido relegadas: tal es el caso del analfabetismo, fenómeno acerca del cual es difícil encontrar análisis recientes. En este sentido, es importante preguntar por qué ya no se escribe sobre este fenómeno, si en la actualidad continúa siendo un problema de envergadura, aún no superado en los espacios rurales e indígenas.},\n\tlanguage = {Español},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales},\n\tauthor = {Aguado-López, Eduardo and Rogel-Salazar, Rosario},\n\tyear = {1993},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México},\n\tpages = {197--244},\n}\n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n

\n \n undefined\n \n \n (1)\n \n \n

\n

\n \n \n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n .\n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 9 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n