\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Time Anomalies in Virtual Reality - Impact of Manipulated Zeitgebers on Individual Human Time Perception.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Fischer, S.; Breitsameter, L.; and Hoelzl, G.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, of
EWSN '22, pages 232–237, USA, 2022. Junction Publishing\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{ewsn2022_2,\n\tabstract = {Virtual reality (VR) technologies are becoming more and more present in recent years and are no longer limited to the well-known use case of video games, as they are also expanding their way into social networks, digital marketplaces and productive work. The more time people spend in VR,the more important the question becomes, whether a computergenerated reality can also influence human time perception. This work follows the goal of investigating the impact of zeitgebers, in particular the movement speed of a virtual sun, on human time judments in VR. The development platform Unity is used to create different VR worlds with varying sun movement speeds. In a user study with 12 participants, each person is immersed twice for a period of 10 minutes, and at the end of each scenario, they must estimate, how much time they think they have spent in the specific VR world. The evaluation reveals a trend, that the duration in a static world, without any visual objects, is estimated longer, compared to a virtual island environment with sun movement. When comparing an island world with different sun speeds, the estimated duration when experiencing a faster movement of the sun, turns out longer. The study has proven, that the presence of a virtual moving sun increases the estimation accuracy significantly, compared to conditions where no sun is visible or moving. The analysis shows no significant differences, when comparing the submitted duration estimates from each participant.},\n\taddress = {USA},\n\tauthor = {Fischer, Stefan and Breitsameter, Lucas and Hoelzl, Gerold},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks},\n\tdate-added = {2023-02-03 09:18:58 +0100},\n\tdate-modified = {2023-02-03 10:01:51 +0100},\n\tkeywords = {Zeitgeber, Virtual Reality, Time Perception, HCI},\n\tlocation = {Linz, Austria},\n\tnumpages = {6},\n\tpages = {232--237},\n\tpublisher = {Junction Publishing},\n\tseries = {EWSN '22},\n\ttitle = {Time Anomalies in Virtual Reality - Impact of Manipulated Zeitgebers on Individual Human Time Perception},\n\turl = {/publications/2022_ewsn_Time.pdf},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tbdsk-url-1 = {/publications/2022_ewsn_Time.pdf}}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Virtual reality (VR) technologies are becoming more and more present in recent years and are no longer limited to the well-known use case of video games, as they are also expanding their way into social networks, digital marketplaces and productive work. The more time people spend in VR,the more important the question becomes, whether a computergenerated reality can also influence human time perception. This work follows the goal of investigating the impact of zeitgebers, in particular the movement speed of a virtual sun, on human time judments in VR. The development platform Unity is used to create different VR worlds with varying sun movement speeds. In a user study with 12 participants, each person is immersed twice for a period of 10 minutes, and at the end of each scenario, they must estimate, how much time they think they have spent in the specific VR world. The evaluation reveals a trend, that the duration in a static world, without any visual objects, is estimated longer, compared to a virtual island environment with sun movement. When comparing an island world with different sun speeds, the estimated duration when experiencing a faster movement of the sun, turns out longer. The study has proven, that the presence of a virtual moving sun increases the estimation accuracy significantly, compared to conditions where no sun is visible or moving. The analysis shows no significant differences, when comparing the submitted duration estimates from each participant.\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Analysis of Common Prediction Models for a Fuzzy Connected Source Target Production Based on Time Dependent Significance.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Soller, S.; Hoelzl, G.; Greiler, T.; and Kranz, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In
Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, of
EWSN '22, pages 226–231, USA, 2022. Junction Publishing\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{ewsn2022_1,\n\tabstract = {In an industrial setup quality measurements are taken in multiple steps of each production chain. Often a single product is evaluated for several steps in the production, but even more often pooled tests are done, to evaluate the quality of the used material or a charge. Instead of the traditional classification of sensor measurement to quality on a single process step, the question arises, how these steps interact with each other. Is it possible to foresee the faults of later production steps, by analyzing data gathered earlier? Especially in mass production this leads to unclear and fuzzy relationships. The material quality might not be known for every work piece produced but controlled in a fixed time interval. The challenge of these processes is, to correctly connect ground truth to feature vector by their temporal connection. In this work we show multiple steps to reach a better classification and insight into the production process. We gather data from a real-world environment and as a first shot, use common machine learning methods, which are available through public libraries. Therefore, we created a simple connection between the material trace elements and quality inspection. Further data analysis suggested the influence of the exact time of the quality inspection related to the measurement of trace elements. We performed a significance test, to proof the difference of time groups to each other. The identical machine learning methods were applied to these time groups and an improvement of classification accuracy of 2\\% could be detected. For feature approaches we propose an automatic split system, to find time dependent groups inside the data and split the data accordingly.},\n\taddress = {USA},\n\tauthor = {Soller, Sebastian and Hoelzl, Gerold and Greiler, Tobias and Kranz, Matthias},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks},\n\tdate-added = {2023-02-03 09:18:58 +0100},\n\tdate-modified = {2023-02-03 10:01:39 +0100},\n\tkeywords = {Reliability Keywords Industry 40, Machine Learning, Performance, Maintenance Prediction},\n\tlocation = {Linz, Austria},\n\tnumpages = {6},\n\tpages = {226--231},\n\tpublisher = {Junction Publishing},\n\tseries = {EWSN '22},\n\ttitle = {Analysis of Common Prediction Models for a Fuzzy Connected Source Target Production Based on Time Dependent Significance},\n\turl = {/publications/2022_ewsn_Fuzzy.pdf},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tbdsk-url-1 = {/publications/2022_ewsn_Fuzzy.pdf}}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In an industrial setup quality measurements are taken in multiple steps of each production chain. Often a single product is evaluated for several steps in the production, but even more often pooled tests are done, to evaluate the quality of the used material or a charge. Instead of the traditional classification of sensor measurement to quality on a single process step, the question arises, how these steps interact with each other. Is it possible to foresee the faults of later production steps, by analyzing data gathered earlier? Especially in mass production this leads to unclear and fuzzy relationships. The material quality might not be known for every work piece produced but controlled in a fixed time interval. The challenge of these processes is, to correctly connect ground truth to feature vector by their temporal connection. In this work we show multiple steps to reach a better classification and insight into the production process. We gather data from a real-world environment and as a first shot, use common machine learning methods, which are available through public libraries. Therefore, we created a simple connection between the material trace elements and quality inspection. Further data analysis suggested the influence of the exact time of the quality inspection related to the measurement of trace elements. We performed a significance test, to proof the difference of time groups to each other. The identical machine learning methods were applied to these time groups and an improvement of classification accuracy of 2% could be detected. For feature approaches we propose an automatic split system, to find time dependent groups inside the data and split the data accordingly.\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Detecting Seasonal Dependencies in Production Lines for Forecast Optimization.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Hoelzl, G.; Soller, S.; and Kranz, M.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
Big Data Research, 30: 100335. 2022.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n
Paper\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n 6 downloads\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@article{HOELZL2022100335,\n\tauthor = {Gerold Hoelzl and Sebastian Soller and Matthias Kranz},\n\tdate-added = {2022-08-04 09:28:31 +0200},\n\tdate-modified = {2022-08-04 09:40:29 +0200},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2022.100335},\n\tissn = {2214-5796},\n\tjournal = {Big Data Research},\n\tkeywords = {Data mining, Real-time system, Maintenance prediction, Time series forecast, Seasonality analysis, Clustering},\n\tpages = {100335},\n\ttitle = {Detecting Seasonal Dependencies in Production Lines for Forecast Optimization},\n\turl = {/publications/2022_BigDataResearch.pdf},\n\tvolume = {30},\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tbdsk-url-1 = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214579622000296},\n\tbdsk-url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2022.100335}}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n