\n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Shaw, R. A.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n The Kassel-Wolfenbüttel Tablature System: A Convergence of Lute Tablature and Mensural Notation.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Di Bacco, G.; Kepper, J.; and Roland, P., editor(s),
Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017, pages 63–71, 2019. Bavarian State Library (BSB)\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{Shaw_2019,\n abstract = {The \\textit{Wolfenb{\\"u}ttel Lute Tablature} (c. 1460) consists of two fragmented folios with intabulations for five secular songs and is the only extant source of a notation system described theoretically in \\textit{Kassel Lautenkragen}. The notation, named the Kassel-Wolfenb{\\"u}ttel Tablature System (KWTS) by Marc Lewon, combines a quasi- mensural notation, which closely resembles the upper voice of organ tablature, and an alphabetic notation, parallel to organ tablature. Because of its connections to both tablature and mensural notations, in order to encode KWTS, one must combine the encoding systems for both tablature and mensural notation. In this paper, I examine some of the problems inherent in encoding KWTS; suggest possible solutions; and define a musicological application for the project. As the earliest lute-specific notation, KWTS contains valuable information on the changing lute performance practices of the mid-fifteenth century, despite the sources' brevity. Developing an encoding system for this notation will enable further exploration of fifteenth-century lute repertoire, including that prior to lute-specific notation.},\n author = {Shaw, Rebecca A.},\n title = {{The Kassel-Wolfenb{\\"u}ttel Tablature System: A Convergence of Lute Tablature and Mensural Notation}},\n pages = {63--71},\n publisher = {{Bavarian State Library (BSB)}},\n editor = {{Di Bacco}, Giuliano and Kepper, Johannes and Roland, Perry},\n booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017}},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.15463/music-1},\n keywords = {mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2016},\n displayby = {Contributions from MEC 2016}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The Wolfenbüttel Lute Tablature (c. 1460) consists of two fragmented folios with intabulations for five secular songs and is the only extant source of a notation system described theoretically in Kassel Lautenkragen. The notation, named the Kassel-Wolfenbüttel Tablature System (KWTS) by Marc Lewon, combines a quasi- mensural notation, which closely resembles the upper voice of organ tablature, and an alphabetic notation, parallel to organ tablature. Because of its connections to both tablature and mensural notations, in order to encode KWTS, one must combine the encoding systems for both tablature and mensural notation. In this paper, I examine some of the problems inherent in encoding KWTS; suggest possible solutions; and define a musicological application for the project. As the earliest lute-specific notation, KWTS contains valuable information on the changing lute performance practices of the mid-fifteenth century, despite the sources' brevity. Developing an encoding system for this notation will enable further exploration of fifteenth-century lute repertoire, including that prior to lute-specific notation.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Swanson, B.; and Lacoste, D.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n Chants That Defy Classification: Implications of Categorization in the Cantus Database.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Di Bacco, G.; Kepper, J.; and Roland, P., editor(s),
Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017, pages 73–78, 2019. Bavarian State Library (BSB)\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{Swanson_2019,\n abstract = {Entering metadata for medieval chants in the Cantus Database often poses challenges for the indexer. Although many of the chants follow the standard, expected forms, some items are difficult to classify. For example, certain melodies do not conform to the standard modes and some chants are unique in their usage for a particular day or service within the liturgical year. Although it is easy to create new classification tags, the prudent database manager exercises caution, as the modern need to categorize does not always conform to medieval custom. By focusing on chants from Holy Week including the \\textit{Exsultet}, \\textit{Improperia} and \\textit{Trisagion}, this paper addresses the various criteria used to create two new genre codes, "Varia" (Va) and "Holy Week Varia" (VaHW). Although these classifiers provide less specificity than other possible options, they avoid over-interpretation, are easy-to-use by novice indexers, and usefully differentiate the unique chants of Holy Week from other chant miscellany.},\n author = {Swanson, Barbara and Lacoste, Debra},\n title = {{Chants That Defy Classification: Implications of Categorization in the Cantus Database}},\n pages = {73--78},\n publisher = {{Bavarian State Library (BSB)}},\n editor = {{Di Bacco}, Giuliano and Kepper, Johannes and Roland, Perry},\n booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017}},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.15463/music-1},\n keywords = {mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2016},\n displayby = {Contributions from MEC 2016}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Entering metadata for medieval chants in the Cantus Database often poses challenges for the indexer. Although many of the chants follow the standard, expected forms, some items are difficult to classify. For example, certain melodies do not conform to the standard modes and some chants are unique in their usage for a particular day or service within the liturgical year. Although it is easy to create new classification tags, the prudent database manager exercises caution, as the modern need to categorize does not always conform to medieval custom. By focusing on chants from Holy Week including the Exsultet, Improperia and Trisagion, this paper addresses the various criteria used to create two new genre codes, \"Varia\" (Va) and \"Holy Week Varia\" (VaHW). Although these classifiers provide less specificity than other possible options, they avoid over-interpretation, are easy-to-use by novice indexers, and usefully differentiate the unique chants of Holy Week from other chant miscellany.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Seipelt, A.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n The Freischütz Performance in Vienna: Encoded Representation of Performance-Related Modifications of the Score.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Di Bacco, G.; Kepper, J.; and Roland, P., editor(s),
Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017, pages 79–90, 2019. Bavarian State Library (BSB)\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{Seipelt_2019,\n abstract = {The first performance of Weber's \\textit{Freisch{\\"u}tz} in Vienna took place November 3rd, 1822. A manuscript copy was bought from Weber, which closely followed the composer's autograph. But a close look to the manuscript reveals a great number of performance-related modifications of both the musical and textual content. These transformations have mostly been major ones, like deletions of whole measures or text passages, and insertions of new pages. On the basis of the BMBF-sponsored project "Freisch{\\"u}tz Digital" (Digital edition of the \\textit{Freisch{\\"u}tz}, hereafter "FreiDi"), this paper tries to develop a way to describe the textual and physical modifications of the manuscript not only verbally but in a semantic, i.e. logic, encoding, based on MEI. For this, the paper explores possible modifications of MEI elements, or the creation of new elements and attributes for the special problems. It will explore the usefulness of markup from other projects, most importantly the \\textit{Beethoven Werkstatt} project with its genetic encodings. It will also discuss the possibilities, problems and limitations of the different solutions.},\n author = {Seipelt, Agnes},\n title = {{The Freisch{\\"u}tz Performance in Vienna: Encoded Representation of Performance-Related Modifications of the Score}},\n pages = {79--90},\n publisher = {{Bavarian State Library (BSB)}},\n editor = {{Di Bacco}, Giuliano and Kepper, Johannes and Roland, Perry},\n booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017}},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.15463/music-1},\n keywords = {mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2016},\n displayby = {Contributions from MEC 2016}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The first performance of Weber's Freischütz in Vienna took place November 3rd, 1822. A manuscript copy was bought from Weber, which closely followed the composer's autograph. But a close look to the manuscript reveals a great number of performance-related modifications of both the musical and textual content. These transformations have mostly been major ones, like deletions of whole measures or text passages, and insertions of new pages. On the basis of the BMBF-sponsored project \"Freischütz Digital\" (Digital edition of the Freischütz, hereafter \"FreiDi\"), this paper tries to develop a way to describe the textual and physical modifications of the manuscript not only verbally but in a semantic, i.e. logic, encoding, based on MEI. For this, the paper explores possible modifications of MEI elements, or the creation of new elements and attributes for the special problems. It will explore the usefulness of markup from other projects, most importantly the Beethoven Werkstatt project with its genetic encodings. It will also discuss the possibilities, problems and limitations of the different solutions.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n Kepper, J.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n Wie? Was? Entsetzen! Lessons Learned from the Freischütz Digital Project.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Di Bacco, G.; Kepper, J.; and Roland, P., editor(s),
Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017, pages 95–105, 2019. Bavarian State Library (BSB)\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n \n \n 1 download\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{Kepper_2019,\n abstract = {The Freisch{\\"u}tz Digital project (FreiDi) was one of the pioneer projects employing MEI in large scale. It did not only try to encode a huge quantity of music material, it also sought to capture as many aspects of the available sources as possible, effectively creating data of almost unrivaled richness. This paper discusses the outcomes of and experiences made in the FreiDi project.},\n author = {Kepper, Johannes},\n title = {{\\textit{Wie? Was? Entsetzen!} Lessons Learned from the Freisch{\\"u}tz Digital Project}},\n pages = {95--105},\n publisher = {{Bavarian State Library (BSB)}},\n editor = {{Di Bacco}, Giuliano and Kepper, Johannes and Roland, Perry},\n booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017}},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.15463/music-1},\n keywords = {mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2016},\n displayby = {Contributions from MEC 2016}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n The Freischütz Digital project (FreiDi) was one of the pioneer projects employing MEI in large scale. It did not only try to encode a huge quantity of music material, it also sought to capture as many aspects of the available sources as possible, effectively creating data of almost unrivaled richness. This paper discusses the outcomes of and experiences made in the FreiDi project.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n DeLaHunt, J.\n\n\n \n \n \n \n All Classical Music, Freely Available As Revisable Digital Scores, Via Crowdsourcing.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Di Bacco, G.; Kepper, J.; and Roland, P., editor(s),
Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017, pages 107–110, 2019. Bavarian State Library (BSB)\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@inproceedings{DeLaHunt_2019,\n abstract = {Our heritage of music scores need to be delivered in 21st century packaging: the symbolic, digital score, instead of the paper-printed book. This will enable better music-making, but also new tools for using digital scores. The digital score plus the new tools will enable dramatically better music-making. Thus it is important to create a corpus of digital scores for the works in our musical heritage. A gap analysis shows that what is missing is an organization which mobilises participation and produces results, and which provides content in symbolic, digital score form, and freely licensed. Such an organization has recently begun operations: the Keyboard Philharmonic project.},\n author = {DeLaHunt, Jim},\n title = {{All Classical Music, Freely Available As Revisable Digital Scores, Via Crowdsourcing}},\n pages = {107--110},\n publisher = {{Bavarian State Library (BSB)}},\n editor = {{Di Bacco}, Giuliano and Kepper, Johannes and Roland, Perry},\n booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2015, 2016 and 2017}},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.15463/music-1},\n keywords = {mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2016},\n displayby = {Contributions from MEC 2016}\n}\n\n%%% ----------------------------------------------------------------\n%%% MEC 2015, 2016 and 2017 Proceedings: Contributions from MEC 2017\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Our heritage of music scores need to be delivered in 21st century packaging: the symbolic, digital score, instead of the paper-printed book. This will enable better music-making, but also new tools for using digital scores. The digital score plus the new tools will enable dramatically better music-making. Thus it is important to create a corpus of digital scores for the works in our musical heritage. A gap analysis shows that what is missing is an organization which mobilises participation and produces results, and which provides content in symbolic, digital score form, and freely licensed. Such an organization has recently begun operations: the Keyboard Philharmonic project.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n