\n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Numbers.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ingmar Lippert.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In James Maguire; and Brit Ross Winthereik., editor(s),
Reclaiming Technology: a poetic-scientific vocabulary, 32, pages 156-159. Ctrl+Alt+Delete Books, 2023.\n
invited contribution\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n publisher\n \n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{Lippert2023NumbersCtrl,\r\n author = {Lippert, Ingmar},\r\n booktitle = {Reclaiming Technology: a poetic-scientific vocabulary},\r\n publisher = {Ctrl+Alt+Delete Books},\r\n title = {Numbers},\r\n year = {2023},\r\n chapter = {32},\r\n editor = {James Maguire and Brit Ross Winthereik},\r\n note = {invited contribution},\r\n pages = {156-159},\r\n abstract = {Numbers are ubiquitary, it is expected we know them. Some hate, others love them. Numbers are involved in everyday practices like shopping, measuring length, counting unread emails. Numbers, too, figure in management, governance, in science, engineering, medicine and many other private and public sector fields that employ technoscience. How comes numbers are so widespread? Are all these numbers similar enough, in kind, for us to treat them similarly? Sociology, Anthropology, History, Human Geography as well as Science and Technology Studies have shown that numbers are employed and produced in very different ways – and that neither mathematics not data science occupy an epistemically privileged position for understanding numbers.},\r\n creationdate = {2023-08-20T16:54:28},\r\n doi = {10/jp4k},\r\n modificationdate = {2023-08-20T17:04:22},\r\n url_publisher = {https://cadb.dk/product/reclaiming-technology-a-poetic-scientific-vocabulary-kopier/?lang=en},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Numbers are ubiquitary, it is expected we know them. Some hate, others love them. Numbers are involved in everyday practices like shopping, measuring length, counting unread emails. Numbers, too, figure in management, governance, in science, engineering, medicine and many other private and public sector fields that employ technoscience. How comes numbers are so widespread? Are all these numbers similar enough, in kind, for us to treat them similarly? Sociology, Anthropology, History, Human Geography as well as Science and Technology Studies have shown that numbers are employed and produced in very different ways – and that neither mathematics not data science occupy an epistemically privileged position for understanding numbers.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n From Energy Poverty to Vulnerability: A Discourse Analysis of the European Union's National Energy and Climate Plans.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Ahmed Noaman El Sherbini; and Ingmar Lippert.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Paola Velasco Herrejón; Breffní Lennon; and Niall Dunphy., editor(s),
Living with Energy Poverty: Perspectives from the Global North and South, of Routledge Explorations in Energy Studies. Routledge, London, 2023.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n \n doi\n \n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{ElSherbiniLippert2023Energy,\r\n author = {Ahmed Noaman {El Sherbini} and Lippert, Ingmar},\r\n booktitle = {Living with Energy Poverty: Perspectives from the Global North and South},\r\n publisher = {Routledge},\r\n title = {From Energy Poverty to Vulnerability: A Discourse Analysis of the European Union's National Energy and Climate Plans},\r\n year = {2023},\r\n address = {London},\r\n editor = {Paola Velasco Herrejón and Breffní Lennon and Niall Dunphy},\r\n isbn = {9781003408536},\r\n series = {Routledge Explorations in Energy Studies},\r\n abstract = {Energy Poverty (EP) is a phenomenon that has increasingly attracted attention since 1975. Accordingly, literature on the phenomenon has been accumulating, leading to numerous ways in which EP is understood. Yet, literature still indicates that defining EP remains elusive. Some technical research tends to mono-dimensionally define EP, allowing generalisation across administrative-spatial contexts. Studies of EP policy, however, claim that ambiguity, complexity, and multidimensionality are inherent characteristics of EP. Any mono-dimensional approach that ignores this “multidimensionality” is unlikely to reliably measure EP in different contexts. This chapter provides an empirical analysis of the European Union (EU) member states' National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs). The analysis explores whether the NECPs' representations of EP also reflect the characteristics of ambiguity, complexity, and multidimensionality. We analyse our data with a Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD) version of discourse analysis. We argue that these characteristics are deeply rooted in the current EU policy discourse on EP. To engage with these characteristics constructively and build upon call to “rethink theorisation” of EP, we reconstruct the phenomenon in terms of vulnerability.},\r\n creationdate = {2022-12-16T21:13:27},\r\n doi = {10/mbb9},\r\n modificationdate = {2024-01-26T16:45:42},\r\n}\r\n\r\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n Energy Poverty (EP) is a phenomenon that has increasingly attracted attention since 1975. Accordingly, literature on the phenomenon has been accumulating, leading to numerous ways in which EP is understood. Yet, literature still indicates that defining EP remains elusive. Some technical research tends to mono-dimensionally define EP, allowing generalisation across administrative-spatial contexts. Studies of EP policy, however, claim that ambiguity, complexity, and multidimensionality are inherent characteristics of EP. Any mono-dimensional approach that ignores this “multidimensionality” is unlikely to reliably measure EP in different contexts. This chapter provides an empirical analysis of the European Union (EU) member states' National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs). The analysis explores whether the NECPs' representations of EP also reflect the characteristics of ambiguity, complexity, and multidimensionality. We analyse our data with a Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD) version of discourse analysis. We argue that these characteristics are deeply rooted in the current EU policy discourse on EP. To engage with these characteristics constructively and build upon call to “rethink theorisation” of EP, we reconstruct the phenomenon in terms of vulnerability.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n