\n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n The saint, the criminal and the terrorist: towards a hypothesis on terrorism.\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Balagangadhara, S.; and De Roover, J.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 18(1): 1–15. 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n \n Paper\n \n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Article{\t 783281,\n author\t= {Balagangadhara, S.N. and De Roover, Jakob},\n issn\t\t= {0963-8016},\n journal\t= {JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY},\n language\t= {eng},\n number\t= {1},\n pages\t\t= {1--15},\n title\t\t= {The saint, the criminal and the terrorist: towards a\n\t\t hypothesis on terrorism},\n url\t\t= {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00336.x},\n volume\t= {18},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n The colonial construction of what?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n De Roover, J.; and Claerhout, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bloch, E.; Keppens, M.; and Hegde, R., editor(s),
Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction of Hinduism, volume 4, of Routledge South Asian Religion Series, pages 164–183. Routledge, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n \n \n abstract \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{\t 783282,\n abstract\t= {In The Colonial Construction of What?, Jakob De Roover and\n\t\t Sarah Claerhout raise three fundamental questions to clear\n\t\t the conceptual ground required for theory formation on the\n\t\t construction of Hinduism. First, they analyze the question\n\t\t ‘Is religion a construct?’ The claim that religion is\n\t\t only a conceptual tool of the scholar, which does not refer\n\t\t to any empirical reality, they argue, fails to make sense\n\t\t in the absence of a theory of religion. However, this does\n\t\t not imply it is nonsensical to speak of the construction of\n\t\t Hinduism. ‘Is Hinduism a construct?’ is answered in the\n\t\t positive, but qualified in a limited empirical sense.\n\t\t Subsequently, they raise the question as to ‘What is\n\t\t constructed in the process of construction?’ On the one\n\t\t hand, one could suggest that Hinduism has come into being\n\t\t as an object, a new religion that materialized on the\n\t\t subcontinent. On the other hand, one could argue, as De\n\t\t Roover and Claerhout do, that Hinduism has been created as\n\t\t a conceptual unit in certain descriptions of India only.\n\t\t These descriptions have had impact upon Indian society, but\n\t\t this does not entail that Hindu religion exists in India\n\t\t today.},\n author\t= {De Roover, Jakob and Claerhout, Sarah},\n booktitle\t= {Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction\n\t\t of Hinduism},\n editor\t= {Bloch, Esther and Keppens, Marianne and Hegde, Rajaram},\n isbn\t\t= {9780415548908},\n language\t= {eng},\n pages\t\t= {164--183},\n publisher\t= {Routledge},\n series\t= {Routledge South Asian Religion Series},\n title\t\t= {The colonial construction of what?},\n volume\t= {4},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n In The Colonial Construction of What?, Jakob De Roover and Sarah Claerhout raise three fundamental questions to clear the conceptual ground required for theory formation on the construction of Hinduism. First, they analyze the question ‘Is religion a construct?’ The claim that religion is only a conceptual tool of the scholar, which does not refer to any empirical reality, they argue, fails to make sense in the absence of a theory of religion. However, this does not imply it is nonsensical to speak of the construction of Hinduism. ‘Is Hinduism a construct?’ is answered in the positive, but qualified in a limited empirical sense. Subsequently, they raise the question as to ‘What is constructed in the process of construction?’ On the one hand, one could suggest that Hinduism has come into being as an object, a new religion that materialized on the subcontinent. On the other hand, one could argue, as De Roover and Claerhout do, that Hinduism has been created as a conceptual unit in certain descriptions of India only. These descriptions have had impact upon Indian society, but this does not entail that Hindu religion exists in India today.\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Rethinking religion in India: the colonial construction of Hinduism.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Bloch, E.; Keppens, M.; and Hegde, R.,\n editors.\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n Volume 4 of Routledge South Asian Religion SeriesRoutledge, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Book{\t\t 786500,\n editor\t= {Bloch, Esther and Keppens, Marianne and Hegde, Rajaram},\n isbn\t\t= {9780415548908},\n keywords\t= {colonial construction,Hinduism,Indian\n\t\t traditions,India,Indian religions,Religion},\n language\t= {eng},\n pages\t\t= {XV, 192},\n publisher\t= {Routledge},\n series\t= {Routledge South Asian Religion Series},\n title\t\t= {Rethinking religion in India: the colonial construction of\n\t\t Hinduism},\n volume\t= {4},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Introduction: rethinking religion in India.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Keppens, M.; and Bloch, E.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bloch, E.; Keppens, M.; and Hegde, R., editor(s),
Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction of Hinduism, volume 4, of Routledge South Asian Religion Series, pages 1–21. Routledge, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{\t 786508,\n author\t= {Keppens, Marianne and Bloch, Esther},\n booktitle\t= {Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction\n\t\t of Hinduism},\n editor\t= {Bloch, Esther and Keppens, Marianne and Hegde, Rajaram},\n isbn\t\t= {9780415548908},\n keywords\t= {colonial construction,Indian religions,Religion,Indian\n\t\t traditions,Hinduism},\n language\t= {eng},\n pages\t\t= {1--21},\n publisher\t= {Routledge},\n series\t= {Routledge South Asian Religion Series},\n title\t\t= {Introduction: rethinking religion in India},\n volume\t= {4},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Orientalism, postcolonialism and the 'construction' of religion.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Balagangadhara, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Bloch, E.; Keppens, M.; and Hegde, R., editor(s),
Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction of Hinduism, volume 4, of Routledge South Asian Religion Series, pages 135–163. Routledge, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{\t 818481,\n author\t= {Balagangadhara, S.N.},\n booktitle\t= {Rethinking religion in India : the colonial construction\n\t\t of Hinduism},\n editor\t= {Bloch, Esther and Keppens, Marianne and Hegde, Rajaram},\n isbn\t\t= {9780415548908},\n keywords\t= {Orientalism,Construction of Religion,Postcolonialism},\n language\t= {eng},\n pages\t\t= {135--163},\n publisher\t= {Routledge},\n series\t= {Routledge South Asian Religion Series},\n title\t\t= {Orientalism, postcolonialism and the 'construction' of\n\t\t religion},\n volume\t= {4},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Les Dieux de l'Inde dans l’imaginaire européen.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gelders, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Misc{\t\t 952046,\n author\t= {Gelders, Raf},\n keywords\t= {Cross-cultural encounters,Anthropology of\n\t\t religion,Vergelijkende cultuurwetenschap,Cultural\n\t\t history,Hinduism,Colonialism,Religious studies},\n language\t= {fre},\n publisher\t= {Editions du Seuil},\n series\t= {Dictionnaire des Dieux, Déesses et Démons},\n title\t\t= {Les Dieux de l'Inde dans l’imaginaire européen},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Le Brahman dans l’imaginaire européen.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gelders, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Misc{\t\t 952075,\n author\t= {Gelders, Raf},\n keywords\t= {Vergelijkende cultuurwetenschap,Cross-cultural\n\t\t encounters,Anthropology of religion,Religious\n\t\t studies,Colonialism,Cultural history,Hinduism},\n language\t= {fre},\n publisher\t= {Editions du Seuil},\n series\t= {Dictionnaire des Dieux, Déesses et Démons},\n title\t\t= {Le Brahman dans l’imaginaire européen},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Bouddha, Perceptions européennes.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gelders, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Misc{\t\t 952079,\n author\t= {Gelders, Raf},\n keywords\t= {Cross-cultural encounters,Anthropology of\n\t\t religion,Vergelijkende cultuurwetenschap,Religious\n\t\t studies,Hinduism,Colonialism,Cultural history},\n language\t= {fre},\n publisher\t= {Editions du Seuil},\n series\t= {Dictionnaire des Dieux, Déesses et Démons},\n title\t\t= {Bouddha, Perceptions européennes},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Bhaarata mattu Pashchimada Tulane.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Balagangadhara, S.; Praveen, T.; and Palve, V.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Lalithamba, D., editor(s),
Sampreethi, pages 341–347. Paraspara, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{\t 1143155,\n author\t= {Balagangadhara, S.N. and Praveen, TL and Palve, Vani},\n booktitle\t= {Sampreethi},\n editor\t= {Lalithamba, DNR},\n language\t= {kan},\n pages\t\t= {341--347},\n publisher\t= {Paraspara},\n title\t\t= {Bhaarata mattu Pashchimada Tulane},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Secularism, Vasaahatushaahitva mattu Bhaaratiya Buddhijivigalu.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n De Roover, J.; and SL, P.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n In Lalithamba, D., editor(s),
Sampreethi, pages 368–385. Paraspara, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@InCollection{\t 1143291,\n author\t= {De Roover, Jakob and SL, Prajna},\n booktitle\t= {Sampreethi},\n editor\t= {Lalithamba, DNR},\n language\t= {kan},\n pages\t\t= {368--385},\n publisher\t= {Paraspara},\n title\t\t= {Secularism, Vasaahatushaahitva mattu Bhaaratiya\n\t\t Buddhijivigalu},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Bharatiyonki avashyakata : ithihasa athava ateet?.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Balagangadhara, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n
CHINTAN-SRIJA, 7(4): 9–28. 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@Article{\t 1185466,\n author\t= {Balagangadhara, S.N.},\n issn\t\t= {0973-1490},\n journal\t= {CHINTAN-SRIJA},\n language\t= {hin},\n number\t= {4},\n pages\t\t= {9--28},\n title\t\t= {Bharatiyonki avashyakata : ithihasa athava ateet?},\n volume\t= {7},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Ascetics and crafty priests: orientalism and the Europeanrepresentations of India.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Gelders, R.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@PhDThesis{\t 4333703,\n author\t= {Gelders, Raf},\n language\t= {eng},\n school\t= {Ghent University},\n title\t\t= {Ascetics and crafty priests: orientalism and the\n\t\t Europeanrepresentations of India.},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n 'Losing my tradition': conversion, secularism and religiousfreedom in India.\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Claerhout, S.\n\n\n \n\n\n\n Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, 2010.\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n\n \n\n \n\n \n link\n \n \n\n bibtex\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n
@PhDThesis{\t 4333704,\n author\t= {Claerhout, Sarah},\n language\t= {eng},\n school\t= {Ghent University},\n title\t\t= {'Losing my tradition': conversion, secularism and\n\t\t religiousfreedom in India.},\n year\t\t= {2010}\n}\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n