generated by bibbase.org
  Bolinger, D. (1)
Dwight Bolinger. The remarkable double IS. English Today, 3(1): 39–40. January 1987.
The remarkable double IS [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract   3 downloads  
  Brenier, J. (3)
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Staum; and Laura Michaelis. “The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1): 85–96. October 2006.
“The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Jason Brenier; and Laura Michaelis. Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1): 45–88. 2005.
link   bibtex  
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Michaelis; and Laura Staum. ISIS: It's not a disfluency, but how do we know that?. 2006. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.
link   bibtex  
  Calude, A. (1)
Andreea S. Calude. Demonstrative clefts and double cleft constructions in spontaneous spoken English. Studia Linguistica, 62(1): 78–118. April 2008.
Demonstrative clefts and double cleft constructions in spontaneous spoken English [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
  Coppock, E. (3)
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Staum; and Laura Michaelis. “The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1): 85–96. October 2006.
“The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Elizabeth Coppock; and Laura Staum. Origin of the English double-is construction. 2004.
Origin of the English double-is construction [pdf]Paper   link   bibtex   1 download  
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Michaelis; and Laura Staum. ISIS: It's not a disfluency, but how do we know that?. 2006. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.
link   bibtex  
  Curzan, A. (1)
Anne Curzan. Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus-based evidence. . November 2012.
Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus-based evidence [link]Paper   link   bibtex   abstract  
  Gisle, A. (1)
Andersen Gisle. Corpora and the Double Copula. In From the COLT's mouth ... and others: Language Corpora Studies, in Honor of Anna-Brita Strenstrom, pages 43–58. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002.
link   bibtex  
  Grant, E. (1)
Diane Massam; and Erin Grant. Given two be’s, how do they Agree?. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 59(3): 395–405. November 2014.
Given two be’s, how do they Agree? [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
  Haley, M. (1)
Michael Shapiro; and Michael C. Haley. The Reduplicative Copula Is Is. American Speech, 77(3): 305–312. September 2002.
The Reduplicative Copula Is Is [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   2 downloads  
  Heycock, C. (1)
Caroline Heycock; and Anthony Kroch. Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3): 365–397. 1999.
Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex  
  Kroch, A. (1)
Caroline Heycock; and Anthony Kroch. Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3): 365–397. 1999.
Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex  
  Massam, D. (4)
Diane Massam. Intrusive Be Constructions in (Spoken) English: Apposition and Beyond. In 2012 Annual Proceedings, 2013.
link   bibtex  
Diane Massam. Extra be: The syntax of shared shell-noun constructions in English. Language, 93(1): 121–152. March 2017.
Extra be: The syntax of shared shell-noun constructions in English [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Diane Massam; and Erin Grant. Given two be’s, how do they Agree?. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 59(3): 395–405. November 2014.
Given two be’s, how do they Agree? [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Diane Massam. Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what's the right analysis?. English Language & Linguistics, 3(2): 335–352. November 1999.
link   bibtex   abstract  
  McConvell, P. (1)
Patrick McConvell. To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 8(2): 287–305. December 1988.
To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex  
  Michaelis, L. (3)
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Staum; and Laura Michaelis. “The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1): 85–96. October 2006.
“The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Jason Brenier; and Laura Michaelis. Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1): 45–88. 2005.
link   bibtex  
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Michaelis; and Laura Staum. ISIS: It's not a disfluency, but how do we know that?. 2006. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.
link   bibtex  
  O'Neill, T. (1)
Teresa O'Neill. Demystifying Double-is. . 2015. Talk handout, CUNY Graduate Center
Demystifying Double-is [link]Paper   link   bibtex  
  Ross-Hagebaum, S. (1)
Sebastian Ross-Hagebaum. "And that's my big area of interest in linguistics is discourse" - the forms and functions of the English that's X is Y-construction. BLS, 30: 403–414. 2005.
link   bibtex  
  Shapiro, M. (1)
Michael Shapiro; and Michael C. Haley. The Reduplicative Copula Is Is. American Speech, 77(3): 305–312. September 2002.
The Reduplicative Copula Is Is [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   2 downloads  
  Staum, L. (3)
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Staum; and Laura Michaelis. “The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1): 85–96. October 2006.
“The thing is, is” Is No Mere Disfluency [link]Paper   doi   link   bibtex   abstract  
Elizabeth Coppock; and Laura Staum. Origin of the English double-is construction. 2004.
Origin of the English double-is construction [pdf]Paper   link   bibtex   1 download  
Elizabeth Coppock; Jason Brenier; Laura Michaelis; and Laura Staum. ISIS: It's not a disfluency, but how do we know that?. 2006. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.
link   bibtex  
  Tuggy, D. (1)
David Tuggy. The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is is why?. In Eugene H. Casad., editor(s), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, of Cognitive Linguistics Research, pages 713–752. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996.
link   bibtex  
  Zimmer, B. (1)
Ben Zimmer. Obama's "is is". October 2012.
Obama's "is is" [link]Paper   link   bibtex   abstract   1 download  
  Zwicky, A. (2)
Arnold Zwicky. Extris, extris. July 2006. NWAV abstract, Stanford University
link   bibtex  
Arnold Zwicky. Extris, extris. March 2007. Paper presented at Stanford University
link   bibtex