@inproceedings{bayly_streamlit_2024,
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	series = {{PEARC} '24},
	title = {Streamlit {App} for {Cluster} {Publication} {Impact} {Exploration}},
	isbn = {9798400704192},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3626203.3670633},
	doi = {10.1145/3626203.3670633},
	abstract = {Cyberinfrastructure (CI) resources can be a critical part of a researcher’s project, but only a fraction of publications are reported back to staff at an HPC center. The provisioning of supercomputers, the system administrators, and the research facilitators, represents a significant investment for a university, so it is important to present this value back to key stakeholders. At the University of Arizona (UArizona), we make use of a scholarly communication database service known as OpenAlex to estimate how many publications our researchers are producing. The data is presented as numerical metrics and impactful interactive visualizations using the data science framework Streamlit https://hpc-pub-impact.streamlit.app/. This work is in its infancy but aims to provide a user more information about the impact our CI on campus in terms of publications over the last 6 years. Sharing this work at PEARC may enable individuals at other institutions to reveal similar metrics for their own systems, and to leverage our existing visualization tool for the presentation of such information.},
	urldate = {2024-07-22},
	booktitle = {Practice and {Experience} in {Advanced} {Research} {Computing} 2024: {Human} {Powered} {Computing}},
	publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
	author = {Bayly, Devin and Kruse, Benjamin and Reidy, Christopher},
	month = jul,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {1--4},
}

Cyberinfrastructure (CI) resources can be a critical part of a researcher’s project, but only a fraction of publications are reported back to staff at an HPC center. The provisioning of supercomputers, the system administrators, and the research facilitators, represents a significant investment for a university, so it is important to present this value back to key stakeholders. At the University of Arizona (UArizona), we make use of a scholarly communication database service known as OpenAlex to estimate how many publications our researchers are producing. The data is presented as numerical metrics and impactful interactive visualizations using the data science framework Streamlit https://hpc-pub-impact.streamlit.app/. This work is in its infancy but aims to provide a user more information about the impact our CI on campus in terms of publications over the last 6 years. Sharing this work at PEARC may enable individuals at other institutions to reveal similar metrics for their own systems, and to leverage our existing visualization tool for the presentation of such information.

@article{akbaritabar_global_2024,
	title = {A global perspective on social stratification in science},
	volume = {11},
	issn = {2662-9992},
	url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03402-w},
	doi = {10.1057/s41599-024-03402-w},
	abstract = {Abstract
            To study stratification among scientists, we reconstruct the career-long trajectories of 8.2 million scientists worldwide using 12 bibliometric measures of productivity, geographical mobility, collaboration, and research impact. While most previous studies examined these variables in isolation, we study their relationships using Multiple Correspondence and Cluster Analysis. We group authors according to their bibliometric performance and academic age across six macro fields of science, and analyze co-authorship networks and detect collaboration communities of different sizes. We found a stratified structure in terms of academic age and bibliometric classes, with a small top class and large middle and bottom classes in all collaboration communities. Results are robust to community detection algorithms used and do not depend on authors’ gender. These results imply that increased productivity, impact, and collaboration are driven by a relatively small group that accounts for a large share of academic outputs, i.e., the top class. Mobility indicators are the only exception with bottom classes contributing similar or larger shares. We also show that those at the top succeed by collaborating with various authors from other classes and age groups. Nevertheless, they are benefiting disproportionately from these collaborations which may have implications for persisting stratification in academia.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2024-07-19},
	journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences Communications},
	author = {Akbaritabar, Aliakbar and Castro Torres, Andrés Felipe and Larivière, Vincent},
	month = jul,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {914},
}

Abstract To study stratification among scientists, we reconstruct the career-long trajectories of 8.2 million scientists worldwide using 12 bibliometric measures of productivity, geographical mobility, collaboration, and research impact. While most previous studies examined these variables in isolation, we study their relationships using Multiple Correspondence and Cluster Analysis. We group authors according to their bibliometric performance and academic age across six macro fields of science, and analyze co-authorship networks and detect collaboration communities of different sizes. We found a stratified structure in terms of academic age and bibliometric classes, with a small top class and large middle and bottom classes in all collaboration communities. Results are robust to community detection algorithms used and do not depend on authors’ gender. These results imply that increased productivity, impact, and collaboration are driven by a relatively small group that accounts for a large share of academic outputs, i.e., the top class. Mobility indicators are the only exception with bottom classes contributing similar or larger shares. We also show that those at the top succeed by collaborating with various authors from other classes and age groups. Nevertheless, they are benefiting disproportionately from these collaborations which may have implications for persisting stratification in academia.

@article{bilicsi_modern_2024,
	title = {Modern tudományos publikálási technikák könyvtáros szemmel = {Modern} {Scientific} {Publishing} {Techniques} from a {Librarian}’s {Perspective}},
	volume = {185},
	issn = {0025-0325},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1556/2065.185.2024.7.10},
	abstract = {A tudományos teljesítmény értékelésének egyik legelterjedtebb eszköze annak vizsgálata, hogy a szerző milyen folyóiratokban publikál. Az utóbbi években az a tendencia figyelhető meg a hazai értékelési gyakorlatban, hogy elvárttá vált a nemzetközi, kereskedelmi adatbázisokban indexelt kiadványokban való közlés. Tény, hogy a szerzők a sikeresség érdekében úgy publikálnak, ahogy azt a minősítő szervezet elvárja. Így a hazai, jellemzően magyar nyelvű kiadványok elkezdtek arra törekedni, hogy bekerüljenek a kereskedelmi adatbázisokba. De valóban „jobbak-e” az ilyen folyóiratok? Vagy csak egyszerűbb egy kész, megvásárolható termék alapján elvégezni a minősítés egy részét? Jelen tanulmány azokat a technikákat mutatja be, amelyek használata ellensúlyozhatná az értékelés kereskedelmi szolgáltatóktól való függését. Ezek a technikák – bár alapvetőek a tudományos kommunikációban – nem feltétlenül ismertek a szerzők vagy az olvasók számára. {\textbar} 
One of the most widely used tools for evaluating academic performance is to check the quality of the journals in which an author publishes. In recent years, there has been a trend in national evaluation practice to expect publication in international publications indexed in commercial databases. In fact, authors publish according to the evaluation expectations in order to be successful. Thus, domestic publications, typically in Hungarian, have started to strive to be included in commercial databases. But are such journals really “better”? Or is it just easier to do some of the rating on the basis of a ready-made, purchasable product? This paper presents techniques that could be used to counterbalance the dependence of evaluation on commercial providers. These techniques, although fundamental to scientific communication, are not necessarily known to the authors or the readers.},
	language = {hu},
	number = {7},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {MAGYAR TUDOMÁNY},
	author = {Bilicsi, Erika and Holl, András},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Number: 7
Publisher: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia},
	pages = {930--938},
}

A tudományos teljesítmény értékelésének egyik legelterjedtebb eszköze annak vizsgálata, hogy a szerző milyen folyóiratokban publikál. Az utóbbi években az a tendencia figyelhető meg a hazai értékelési gyakorlatban, hogy elvárttá vált a nemzetközi, kereskedelmi adatbázisokban indexelt kiadványokban való közlés. Tény, hogy a szerzők a sikeresség érdekében úgy publikálnak, ahogy azt a minősítő szervezet elvárja. Így a hazai, jellemzően magyar nyelvű kiadványok elkezdtek arra törekedni, hogy bekerüljenek a kereskedelmi adatbázisokba. De valóban „jobbak-e” az ilyen folyóiratok? Vagy csak egyszerűbb egy kész, megvásárolható termék alapján elvégezni a minősítés egy részét? Jelen tanulmány azokat a technikákat mutatja be, amelyek használata ellensúlyozhatná az értékelés kereskedelmi szolgáltatóktól való függését. Ezek a technikák – bár alapvetőek a tudományos kommunikációban – nem feltétlenül ismertek a szerzők vagy az olvasók számára. \textbar One of the most widely used tools for evaluating academic performance is to check the quality of the journals in which an author publishes. In recent years, there has been a trend in national evaluation practice to expect publication in international publications indexed in commercial databases. In fact, authors publish according to the evaluation expectations in order to be successful. Thus, domestic publications, typically in Hungarian, have started to strive to be included in commercial databases. But are such journals really “better”? Or is it just easier to do some of the rating on the basis of a ready-made, purchasable product? This paper presents techniques that could be used to counterbalance the dependence of evaluation on commercial providers. These techniques, although fundamental to scientific communication, are not necessarily known to the authors or the readers.

@article{tourinho_migracoes_2024,
	title = {Migrações forçadas de mulheres e meninas e o direito à saúde: uma análise comparada das experiências do {Brasil}, {Espanha} e {Portugal}},
	volume = {16},
	copyright = {Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Direito - Trabalho, Sociedade e Cidadania},
	issn = {2448-2358},
	shorttitle = {Migrações forçadas de mulheres e meninas e o direito à saúde},
	url = {https://revista.iesb.br/revista/index.php/ojsiesb/article/view/231},
	doi = {10.61541/hhesqd76},
	abstract = {Contemporary migrations are marked by the intense migratory flow of forced displacements, which result from a context of serious violation of human rights, marked by political, social, economic or environmental crises, which make survival in their countries of origin impossible. In this context, crossings are driven by the search for a safe place, capable of guaranteeing the existential minimum. When analyzing the profiles of migrant and refugee populations, the intersection of gender stands out, with an increase in the incidence of women and girls on the move. For this reason, it is important to analyze whether the migration policies adopted satisfy the integrity of social rights for all people, especially the right to health for women and girls on the move. In the meantime, the study examined access to the right to health for women and girls based on a comparative analysis of the experiences of Brazil, Portugal and Spain, with the aim of revealing the obstacles and challenges of the social marker of gender in the effectiveness of health rights in the countries. To this end, the research used a bibliographic and documentary methodology, with a historical-dialectic approach to understanding health inequities. It was concluded that gender vulnerability accentuates the difficulties in accessing health, even in different countries.},
	language = {pt},
	number = {16},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {Revista de Direito - Trabalho, Sociedade e Cidadania},
	author = {Tourinho, Luciano de Oliveira Souza and Sotero, Ana Paula da Silva and Rodríguez, Pedro Garrido},
	month = jul,
	year = {2024},
	note = {Number: 16},
	keywords = {Análise Comparativa, Comparative Analysis., Deslocamentos Forçados, Direito à Saúde, Forced Relocations., Gender., Gênero, Health Inequities., Iniquidades sanitárias, Right to Health.},
	pages = {1--33},
}

Contemporary migrations are marked by the intense migratory flow of forced displacements, which result from a context of serious violation of human rights, marked by political, social, economic or environmental crises, which make survival in their countries of origin impossible. In this context, crossings are driven by the search for a safe place, capable of guaranteeing the existential minimum. When analyzing the profiles of migrant and refugee populations, the intersection of gender stands out, with an increase in the incidence of women and girls on the move. For this reason, it is important to analyze whether the migration policies adopted satisfy the integrity of social rights for all people, especially the right to health for women and girls on the move. In the meantime, the study examined access to the right to health for women and girls based on a comparative analysis of the experiences of Brazil, Portugal and Spain, with the aim of revealing the obstacles and challenges of the social marker of gender in the effectiveness of health rights in the countries. To this end, the research used a bibliographic and documentary methodology, with a historical-dialectic approach to understanding health inequities. It was concluded that gender vulnerability accentuates the difficulties in accessing health, even in different countries.

@article{rocha_direito_2024,
	title = {Direito, norma, antinorma: perspectivas foucaultianas},
	volume = {16},
	copyright = {Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Direito - Trabalho, Sociedade e Cidadania},
	issn = {2448-2358},
	shorttitle = {Direito, norma, antinorma},
	url = {https://revista.iesb.br/revista/index.php/ojsiesb/article/view/223},
	doi = {10.61541/6gf5sh14},
	abstract = {The work of Michel Foucault, one of the greatest thinkers of the 20th century, is generally divided into three specific moments: the archaeological, the genealogy of power and the genealogy of ethics, comprising, respectively, the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. . There is almost a consensus, however, that this division was not watertight, as a subsequent topic was generally addressed previously or was indicated there. This article starts from this investigative line, and seeks to establish a relationship between some of Foucault's reflections on law, up to the most privileged aspect of the normative issue. In other words, instead of focusing on the aspect of laws or formal codes of conduct, although this cannot be discarded in the configuration of contemporary societies, Foucault was interested, since his first great work, the History of Madness, in understanding how the Normative control of individuals was more fundamental. And it didn't matter if this control was disguised by the mask of science. Moral or ideological questions often took the place of supposed epistemological inclinations. From the issue of law to that of the norm, History of Madness will refer to an anti-normative instance, related to art, which will never be absent in Foucault's work.},
	language = {pt},
	number = {16},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {Revista de Direito - Trabalho, Sociedade e Cidadania},
	author = {Rocha, Jorge and Vasconcelos, Paulo},
	month = jun,
	year = {2024},
	note = {Number: 16},
	keywords = {pt},
	pages = {1--19},
}

The work of Michel Foucault, one of the greatest thinkers of the 20th century, is generally divided into three specific moments: the archaeological, the genealogy of power and the genealogy of ethics, comprising, respectively, the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. . There is almost a consensus, however, that this division was not watertight, as a subsequent topic was generally addressed previously or was indicated there. This article starts from this investigative line, and seeks to establish a relationship between some of Foucault's reflections on law, up to the most privileged aspect of the normative issue. In other words, instead of focusing on the aspect of laws or formal codes of conduct, although this cannot be discarded in the configuration of contemporary societies, Foucault was interested, since his first great work, the History of Madness, in understanding how the Normative control of individuals was more fundamental. And it didn't matter if this control was disguised by the mask of science. Moral or ideological questions often took the place of supposed epistemological inclinations. From the issue of law to that of the norm, History of Madness will refer to an anti-normative instance, related to art, which will never be absent in Foucault's work.

@article{jimenez-yanez_what_2024,
	title = {What {Do} {You} {Need} to {Know} {About} {Predatory} and {Pirated} {Journals}?},
	url = {https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/cultural/v10/2448-539X-cultural-10-e001-en.pdf},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	author = {JIMÉNEZ-YAÑEZ, CÉSAR and COLMENARES-DÍAZ, ZICRI},
	year = {2024},
}

@article{liu_spatiotemporal_2024,
	title = {Spatiotemporal mobility network of global scientists, 1970–2020},
	volume = {0},
	issn = {1365-8816},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2369540},
	doi = {10.1080/13658816.2024.2369540},
	abstract = {The mobility of scientists, manifested by movements to new academic institutions, grows with globalization and plays a crucial role in individual careers, institutional productivity, and knowledge dissemination. Current research on scientists’ mobility focuses on aggregated levels such as inter-country mobility, with little attention paid to fine-grained institutional level, leading to a simplified spatial portrayal of the mobility. To fill the gap, we take scientists in geography as examples, and reconstructed their dynamic mobility network among institutions from 1970 to 2020 based on massive literature metadata. Our findings reveal the spatial mobility pattern that is now dominated by North America, Western and Northern Europe, East Asia, and Oceania, with the trend of intensification, multipolarity, and inequality over time. Specifically, the mobility network exhibits clear community structure largely constrained by spatial proximity and national borders. We also uncovered a universal downward mobility pattern embedded in the hierarchical structure. Our quantitative analysis further suggest that mobility is facilitated by multiple realities, including spatial, cultural, and scientific proximity, institutional rankings and national economic levels, cooperation, and visa-free policies, with varying dynamics. These results contribute to spatiotemporal insights into the mechanisms of scientific development in theory, and the basis for talent policymaking in practice. • The mobility of scientists has long been dominated by institutions in developed countries, with China emerging in recent decades. • Spatial proximity and national borders largely constrain the mobility of scientists. • The hierarchy in mobility network determines the decrease trend in institutional prestige from original to new academic positions. • The mobility of scientists between institutions is positively associated with stronger cooperation, same language, and visa-free policies.},
	number = {0},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {International Journal of Geographical Information Science},
	author = {Liu, Tianyu and Pei, Tao and Fang, Zidong and Wu, Mingbo and Liu, Xiaohan and Yan, Xiaorui and Song, Ci and Jiang, Jingyu and Jiang, Linfeng and Chen, Jie},
	month = jun,
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Taylor \& Francis
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2369540},
	keywords = {Scientific mobility, literature metadata, mobility pattern, science of science, spatiotemporal network},
	pages = {1--28},
}

The mobility of scientists, manifested by movements to new academic institutions, grows with globalization and plays a crucial role in individual careers, institutional productivity, and knowledge dissemination. Current research on scientists’ mobility focuses on aggregated levels such as inter-country mobility, with little attention paid to fine-grained institutional level, leading to a simplified spatial portrayal of the mobility. To fill the gap, we take scientists in geography as examples, and reconstructed their dynamic mobility network among institutions from 1970 to 2020 based on massive literature metadata. Our findings reveal the spatial mobility pattern that is now dominated by North America, Western and Northern Europe, East Asia, and Oceania, with the trend of intensification, multipolarity, and inequality over time. Specifically, the mobility network exhibits clear community structure largely constrained by spatial proximity and national borders. We also uncovered a universal downward mobility pattern embedded in the hierarchical structure. Our quantitative analysis further suggest that mobility is facilitated by multiple realities, including spatial, cultural, and scientific proximity, institutional rankings and national economic levels, cooperation, and visa-free policies, with varying dynamics. These results contribute to spatiotemporal insights into the mechanisms of scientific development in theory, and the basis for talent policymaking in practice. • The mobility of scientists has long been dominated by institutions in developed countries, with China emerging in recent decades. • Spatial proximity and national borders largely constrain the mobility of scientists. • The hierarchy in mobility network determines the decrease trend in institutional prestige from original to new academic positions. • The mobility of scientists between institutions is positively associated with stronger cooperation, same language, and visa-free policies.

@article{segundo_inovacao_2024,
	title = {Inovação e {Conectividade}: {Uma} perspectiva sobre o {Projeto} {BrCris} e suas tecnologias para tratamento de dados científicos},
	volume = {7},
	copyright = {Copyright (c) 2024 Washington Luís Ribeiro de Carvalho Segundo, Thiago Magela Rodrigues Dias, Marcel Garcia de Souza, Fhillipe de Freitas Campos, Denise Aparecida Freitas de Andrade},
	issn = {2965-3436},
	shorttitle = {Inovação e {Conectividade}},
	url = {https://labcotec.ibict.br/widat/index.php/widat2024/article/view/182},
	doi = {10.22477/vii.widat.182},
	abstract = {Introduction: In the Brazilian context, the BrCris Platform emerges as an innovative initiative, integrating data from the entire national scientific research ecosystem. Covering the diversity of scientific production, from articles to technical productions such as software and patents. Methodology: This work presents the technologies involved in the data integration process into a standardized repository, enabling an accurate view of Brazilian scientific and technological production. Data interoperability and adherence to international modeling standards stand out as fundamental strategies. Results: Data transformation and integration processes are explored and detailed, emphasizing the quality, consistency and standardization of the information made available. User-friendly visualization interfaces provide an in-depth understanding of the scientific research ecosystem in Brazil. Conclusion: The crucial role of the BrCris Platform in promoting integration and accessibility in the national research ecosystem stands out. By consolidating data from different sources, the platform strengthens the dissemination of information, contributing to scientific advancement in all areas of knowledge.},
	language = {pt},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {VII Workshop de Informação, Dados e Tecnologia - WIDaT 2024},
	author = {Segundo, Washington Luís Ribeiro de Carvalho and Dias, Thiago Magela Rodrigues and Souza, Marcel Garcia de and Campos, Fhillipe de Freitas and Andrade, Denise Aparecida Freitas de},
	month = jun,
	year = {2024},
	keywords = {Análise de Dados, BrCris, Certificação, Ecossistema da Pesquisa, Informação Científica},
	pages = {e182--e182},
}

Introduction: In the Brazilian context, the BrCris Platform emerges as an innovative initiative, integrating data from the entire national scientific research ecosystem. Covering the diversity of scientific production, from articles to technical productions such as software and patents. Methodology: This work presents the technologies involved in the data integration process into a standardized repository, enabling an accurate view of Brazilian scientific and technological production. Data interoperability and adherence to international modeling standards stand out as fundamental strategies. Results: Data transformation and integration processes are explored and detailed, emphasizing the quality, consistency and standardization of the information made available. User-friendly visualization interfaces provide an in-depth understanding of the scientific research ecosystem in Brazil. Conclusion: The crucial role of the BrCris Platform in promoting integration and accessibility in the national research ecosystem stands out. By consolidating data from different sources, the platform strengthens the dissemination of information, contributing to scientific advancement in all areas of knowledge.

@misc{_extraction_2024,
	title = {Extraction and classification of author affiliation information from academic paper {PDFs}},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.11517/pjsai.JSAI2024.0_2N1GS405},
	doi = {10.11517/pjsai.JSAI2024.0_2N1GS405},
	language = {ja},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	publisher = {一般社団法人 人工知能学会},
	author = {山内, 一礼 and 桂井, 麻里衣},
	year = {2024},
}

@article{garcia_actualizacion_2024,
	title = {Actualización de filiaciones de autores {CSIC} en {ROR} ({Research} {Organization} {Registry})},
	url = {http://enredadera.urici.csic.es/index.php/enredadera/article/view/139},
	number = {40},
	urldate = {2024-06-20},
	journal = {Enredadera: Revista de la Red de Bibliotecas y Archivos del CSIC},
	author = {García, Yolanda Ríos},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {75--79},
}

@article{xu_impact_2024,
	title = {The impact of affiliation naming proximity on the retrieval efficiency of {Chinese} universities-affiliated retractions in the {Retraction} {Watch} {Database}},
	issn = {0898-9621, 1545-5815},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2024.2355921},
	doi = {10.1080/08989621.2024.2355921},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-06-20},
	journal = {Accountability in Research},
	author = {Xu, Shaoxiong Brian and Chen, Yunru and Liu, Huifang and Xu, En and Hu, Guangwei},
	month = may,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {1--26},
}

@article{bonina_final_2024,
	title = {Final {Technical} {Report}\_Iniciativa {Latinoamericana} por los {Datos} {Abiertos}},
	url = {https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstreams/e8797986-0323-414b-adf3-6ab6f2afbaba/download},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	author = {Bonina, Carla and Harraca, Martin and Etcheverry, Lorena and Beltramelli, Neolia and Colman, Romina and Spinardi, Anna and Battistotti, Bárbara and del Villar, Zinnya},
	year = {2024},
}

@article{hatfield_addressing_2024,
	title = {Addressing {Whiteness} in communication scholar composition and collaboration across seven decades of {ICA} journals (1951–2022)},
	url = {https://academic.oup.com/joc/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/joc/jqae019/7687236},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	journal = {Journal of Communication},
	author = {Hatfield, Haley R. and Hao, Hongtao and Klein, Matthew and Zhang, Jing and Fu, Yijie and Kim, Jaemin and Lee, Jongmin and Ahn, Sun Joo},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Oxford University Press},
	pages = {jqae019},
}

@article{masson_heliophysics_2024,
	title = {Heliophysics and space weather information architecture and innovative solutions: current status and ways forward},
	shorttitle = {Heliophysics and space weather information architecture and innovative solutions},
	url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724004939},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	journal = {Advances in Space Research},
	author = {Masson, Arnaud and Fung, Shing F. and Camporeale, Enrico and Kuznetsova, Masha M. and Poedts, Stefaan and Barnum, Julie and Ringuette, Rebecca and De Zeeuw, D. and Polson, Shawn and Sadykov, Viacheslav M.},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Elsevier},
}

@article{pilcher_amplified_2024,
	title = {Amplified bottom water acidification rates on the {Bering} {Sea} shelf from 1970–2022},
	volume = {2024},
	url = {https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1096/},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	journal = {EGUsphere},
	author = {Pilcher, Darren and Cross, Jessica and Monacci, Natalie and Mu, Linquan and Kearney, Kelly and Hermann, Albert and Cheng, Wei},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany},
	pages = {1--40},
}

@inproceedings{__2024,
	title = {学術論文 {PDF} からの著者所属情報の抽出と分類},
	url = {https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/pjsai/JSAI2024/0/JSAI2024_2N1GS405/_article/-char/ja/},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	booktitle = {人工知能学会全国大会論文集 第 38 回 (2024)},
	publisher = {一般社団法人 人工知能学会},
	author = {{山内一礼} and {桂井麻里衣}},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {2N1GS405--2N1GS405},
}

@article{bibliotheken_forschungsnahe_2024,
	title = {Forschungsnahe {Dienstleistungen}-{Alphabetische} {Liste}},
	url = {https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/94322},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	author = {Bibliotheken, Leibniz-Arbeitskreis and Dienste, Informationseinrichtungen AG Forschungsnahe},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: DEU},
}

@article{arroyo_bello_alisis_2024,
	title = {Análisis de la investigación española sobre cáncer de mama a través de la {Web} of {Science} (1900-2020)},
	url = {https://docta.ucm.es/entities/publication/aabecc4d-9f3d-46cf-9a12-b0fd323adb7a},
	urldate = {2024-06-24},
	author = {Arroyo Bello, Elena},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Universidad Complutense de Madrid},
}

@article{gupta_use_2024,
	title = {Use of {LLMs} to {Improve} {Affiliation} {Disambiguation} in {Alexandria3k}},
	url = {https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Adde430e8-d0e0-4d63-9785-ed442e3574bd},
	abstract = {The growth of academic publications, heterogeneity of datasets and the absence of a globally accepted organization identifier introduce the challenge of affiliation disambiguation in bibliographic databases. In this paper, we create a baseline using the currently implemented algorithm for author affiliation linkage in Alexandria3k by comparing it to the ground truth. We aim to explore the usage of LLMs (GPT-4) in the Alexandria3k environment to disambiguate author affiliations. The proposed approach extracts the research organization from textual affiliations provided by researchers through their published works and cross-references the organization across the Research Organization Registry. Our process shows promising results and a significant improvement on the existing algorithm in terms of matching rate and identification of multiple affiliations. We discuss the margin of error in LLM results, limitations of the ground truth, and suggest future research directions.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-02-12},
	author = {Gupta, Dibyendu},
	year = {2024},
}

The growth of academic publications, heterogeneity of datasets and the absence of a globally accepted organization identifier introduce the challenge of affiliation disambiguation in bibliographic databases. In this paper, we create a baseline using the currently implemented algorithm for author affiliation linkage in Alexandria3k by comparing it to the ground truth. We aim to explore the usage of LLMs (GPT-4) in the Alexandria3k environment to disambiguate author affiliations. The proposed approach extracts the research organization from textual affiliations provided by researchers through their published works and cross-references the organization across the Research Organization Registry. Our process shows promising results and a significant improvement on the existing algorithm in terms of matching rate and identification of multiple affiliations. We discuss the margin of error in LLM results, limitations of the ground truth, and suggest future research directions.

@article{telles_conheco_2024,
	title = {Conheça o identificador único internacional para instituições de pesquisa ({ROR})},
	volume = {2},
	copyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0},
	issn = {2965-8438},
	url = {https://journals.peletron.science/index.php/revistapeletron/article/view/21},
	abstract = {Este artigo apresenta o Research Organization Registry (ROR), um identificador único internacional para organizações de pesquisa, criado para solucionar desafios de ambiguidade e conectar pesquisadores e resultados de pesquisa. Padronizado pela California Digital Library, Crossref e DataCite, o ROR é utilizado em sistemas de publicação, repositórios de dados, financiamento de pesquisa e outros componentes de infraestrutura acadêmica. Qualquer pessoa pode sugerir adições ou atualizações aos registros ROR, que são mantidos por um processo de curadoria baseado na comunidade. Concentrando-se em organizações globais de relevância, como universidades, empresas de pesquisa e instituições sem fins lucrativos, o ROR promove a transparência e a conectividade no ecossistema global de pesquisa. O texto também aborda a ativação e uso do plugin ROR no Open Journal System (OJS).},
	language = {pt},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2024-03-15},
	journal = {Revista Peletron},
	author = {Telles, Eugênio},
	month = mar,
	year = {2024},
	note = {Number: 1},
	keywords = {Research Organization Registry, indentificadores únicos, ror},
}

Este artigo apresenta o Research Organization Registry (ROR), um identificador único internacional para organizações de pesquisa, criado para solucionar desafios de ambiguidade e conectar pesquisadores e resultados de pesquisa. Padronizado pela California Digital Library, Crossref e DataCite, o ROR é utilizado em sistemas de publicação, repositórios de dados, financiamento de pesquisa e outros componentes de infraestrutura acadêmica. Qualquer pessoa pode sugerir adições ou atualizações aos registros ROR, que são mantidos por um processo de curadoria baseado na comunidade. Concentrando-se em organizações globais de relevância, como universidades, empresas de pesquisa e instituições sem fins lucrativos, o ROR promove a transparência e a conectividade no ecossistema global de pesquisa. O texto também aborda a ativação e uso do plugin ROR no Open Journal System (OJS).

@article{rios_actualizacion_2024,
	title = {Actualización de filiaciones de autores {CSIC} en {ROR} ({Research} {Organization} {Registry})},
	url = {https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/358049/3/Enredadera_2024n40p075_Actualizacion_filiaciones_ROR_autores_CSIC.pdf},
	urldate = {2024-06-20},
	author = {Ríos, Yolanda},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: CSIC-Unidad de Recursos de Información Científica para la Investigación (URICI)},
}

@techreport{orfg_pid_strategy_working_group_developing_2024,
	title = {Developing a {US} {National} {PID} {Strategy}},
	url = {https://zenodo.org/records/10811008},
	abstract = {Utilizing the framework created by the Research Data Alliance, this report was created in collaboration with members of the Higher Education Leadership Initiative for Open Scholarship (HELIOS Open) and the Community Effort on Research Output Tracking workstreams organized by the Open Research Funders Group (ORFG). 

This report outlines the benefits of PIDs, their associated metadata, and the systems that connect them in advancing open scholarship goals in the United States. It provides information on the research and policy landscape associated with PIDs, discusses the value of PID infrastructure, and offers recommendations for effective utilization of PIDs in connecting and tracking research outputs. Ideally, this guidance will be widely adopted by organizations throughout the research ecosystem in the US and potentially adapted globally in other national contexts around the world, as part of a growing movement to deploy national persistent identifier strategies.

For discussion on this document and next steps, join the "Developing a US National PID Strategy" thread on PID Forum.},
	language = {eng},
	urldate = {2024-06-18},
	institution = {Zenodo},
	author = {{ORFG PID Strategy Working Group}},
	month = mar,
	year = {2024},
	doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10811008},
	keywords = {National PID Strategy, PIDs, open scholarship, persistent identifier},
}

Utilizing the framework created by the Research Data Alliance, this report was created in collaboration with members of the Higher Education Leadership Initiative for Open Scholarship (HELIOS Open) and the Community Effort on Research Output Tracking workstreams organized by the Open Research Funders Group (ORFG).  This report outlines the benefits of PIDs, their associated metadata, and the systems that connect them in advancing open scholarship goals in the United States. It provides information on the research and policy landscape associated with PIDs, discusses the value of PID infrastructure, and offers recommendations for effective utilization of PIDs in connecting and tracking research outputs. Ideally, this guidance will be widely adopted by organizations throughout the research ecosystem in the US and potentially adapted globally in other national contexts around the world, as part of a growing movement to deploy national persistent identifier strategies. For discussion on this document and next steps, join the "Developing a US National PID Strategy" thread on PID Forum.

@article{bordons_towards_2024,
	title = {Towards higher standardization of funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: {Current} status in the case of a national and a {European} research fellowship scheme},
	issn = {0958-2029},
	shorttitle = {Towards higher standardization of funding acknowledgements in scientific publications},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae017},
	doi = {10.1093/reseval/rvae017},
	abstract = {Acknowledgement of funding sources in scientific publications is becoming mandatory in science. As funders' instructions are often vague, there is great variability in the way authors acknowledge funding, this hindering the linking of grants to their subsequent publications. The aim of this study is to analyse how funding is acknowledged in scientific publications in two important research fellowship schemes: the Spanish Ramón y Cajal programme (RyC) and the European Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Actions (MSCA). WoS publications in 2017 by Spain-based researchers that include funding acknowledgements from either of the two programmes are identified. Firstly, compliance with funders’ recommendations in terms of the elements included in acknowledgements is analysed. Secondly, the degree of comprehensiveness in the authors’ description of the grants is studied by focusing on how often different items are reported (funding agency, programme, grant number, grantee, year of the call, etc). Thirdly, the use of normalized structured notations in acknowledgements is examined. Around 78\% of RyC vs. 84\% of MSCA grants comply with funders’ recommendations regarding the elements to be included in the acknowledgements. A comprehensive description of grants is unusual in both programmes. Structured notations are included in two-thirds of RyC vs. one-third of MSCA grants. Advantages of using structured notations are highlighted, since they provide unique identification of grants, improve the comprehensiveness and normalization of funding data, facilitate automatic data processing and could be compatible with global grant identifiers. Further standardization of funding data in acknowledgements is needed to optimize their use in science policy studies.},
	urldate = {2024-05-03},
	journal = {Research Evaluation},
	author = {Bordons, María and Morillo, Fernanda and Álvarez-Bornstein, Belén},
	month = apr,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {rvae017},
}

Acknowledgement of funding sources in scientific publications is becoming mandatory in science. As funders' instructions are often vague, there is great variability in the way authors acknowledge funding, this hindering the linking of grants to their subsequent publications. The aim of this study is to analyse how funding is acknowledged in scientific publications in two important research fellowship schemes: the Spanish Ramón y Cajal programme (RyC) and the European Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Actions (MSCA). WoS publications in 2017 by Spain-based researchers that include funding acknowledgements from either of the two programmes are identified. Firstly, compliance with funders’ recommendations in terms of the elements included in acknowledgements is analysed. Secondly, the degree of comprehensiveness in the authors’ description of the grants is studied by focusing on how often different items are reported (funding agency, programme, grant number, grantee, year of the call, etc). Thirdly, the use of normalized structured notations in acknowledgements is examined. Around 78% of RyC vs. 84% of MSCA grants comply with funders’ recommendations regarding the elements to be included in the acknowledgements. A comprehensive description of grants is unusual in both programmes. Structured notations are included in two-thirds of RyC vs. one-third of MSCA grants. Advantages of using structured notations are highlighted, since they provide unique identification of grants, improve the comprehensiveness and normalization of funding data, facilitate automatic data processing and could be compatible with global grant identifiers. Further standardization of funding data in acknowledgements is needed to optimize their use in science policy studies.

@article{__2024-1,
	title = {Метод автоматического пополнения метаданных электронных коллекций цифровой математической библиотеки},
	volume = {27},
	url = {https://rdl-journal.ru/article/view/827},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Электронные библиотеки},
	author = {Гафурова, Полина Олеговна},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {164--186},
}

@article{slesinger_combined_2024,
	title = {The combined effects of ocean warming and ocean acidification on {Pacific} cod ({Gadus} macrocephalus) early life stages},
	volume = {171},
	issn = {0025-3162, 1432-1793},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-024-04439-w},
	doi = {10.1007/s00227-024-04439-w},
	abstract = {Abstract
            
              The eastern North Pacific is simultaneously experiencing ocean warming (OW) and ocean acidification (OA), which may negatively affect fish early life stages. Pacific cod (
              Gadus macrocephalus
              ) is an economically and ecologically important species with demonstrated sensitivity to OW and OA, but their combined impacts are unknown. Through a {\textasciitilde} 9-week experiment, Pacific cod embryos and larvae were reared at one of six combinations of three temperatures (3, 6, 10 °C) and two CO
              2
              levels (ambient: {\textasciitilde} 360 μatm; high: {\textasciitilde} 1560 μatm) in a factorial design. Both embryonic and larval mortality were highest at the warmest temperature. Embryonic daily mortality rates were lower under elevated CO
              2
              and there was no effect of CO
              2
              level on larval daily mortality rates. Growth rates of young larvae (0 to 11 days post-hatch) were faster at warmer temperatures and at high CO
              2
              levels, but growth during the 11–28 days post-hatch interval increased by temperature alone. The condition of larvae decreased with age, but less markedly under high CO
              2
              levels. However, at 6 °C, fish incubated in ambient CO
              2
              remained in higher condition than fish in the high CO
              2
              treatment throughout the experiment. Overall, temperature had the greater influence on Pacific cod early life stages across each measurement endpoint, while CO
              2
              effects were more modest and inconsistent. Subtle developmental differences in larval Pacific cod could be magnified later in life and important in the context of recruitment. These results show the complexity of stage- and trait-specific responses to and value of investigating the combined effects of co-occurring climatic stressors.},
	language = {en},
	number = {6},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Marine Biology},
	author = {Slesinger, Emily and Mundorff, Samantha and Laurel, Benjamin J. and Hurst, Thomas P.},
	month = jun,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {121},
}

Abstract The eastern North Pacific is simultaneously experiencing ocean warming (OW) and ocean acidification (OA), which may negatively affect fish early life stages. Pacific cod ( Gadus macrocephalus ) is an economically and ecologically important species with demonstrated sensitivity to OW and OA, but their combined impacts are unknown. Through a ~ 9-week experiment, Pacific cod embryos and larvae were reared at one of six combinations of three temperatures (3, 6, 10 °C) and two CO 2 levels (ambient: ~ 360 μatm; high: ~ 1560 μatm) in a factorial design. Both embryonic and larval mortality were highest at the warmest temperature. Embryonic daily mortality rates were lower under elevated CO 2 and there was no effect of CO 2 level on larval daily mortality rates. Growth rates of young larvae (0 to 11 days post-hatch) were faster at warmer temperatures and at high CO 2 levels, but growth during the 11–28 days post-hatch interval increased by temperature alone. The condition of larvae decreased with age, but less markedly under high CO 2 levels. However, at 6 °C, fish incubated in ambient CO 2 remained in higher condition than fish in the high CO 2 treatment throughout the experiment. Overall, temperature had the greater influence on Pacific cod early life stages across each measurement endpoint, while CO 2 effects were more modest and inconsistent. Subtle developmental differences in larval Pacific cod could be magnified later in life and important in the context of recruitment. These results show the complexity of stage- and trait-specific responses to and value of investigating the combined effects of co-occurring climatic stressors.

@article{wright_recognising_2024,
	title = {Recognising the importance and impact of {Imaging} {Scientists}: {Global} guidelines for establishing career paths within core facilities},
	volume = {294},
	issn = {0022-2720, 1365-2818},
	shorttitle = {Recognising the importance and impact of {Imaging} {Scientists}},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.13307},
	doi = {10.1111/jmi.13307},
	abstract = {Abstract
            In the dynamic landscape of scientific research, imaging core facilities are vital hubs propelling collaboration and innovation at the technology development and dissemination frontier. Here, we present a collaborative effort led by Global BioImaging (GBI), introducing international recommendations geared towards elevating the careers of Imaging Scientists in core facilities. Despite the critical role of Imaging Scientists in modern research ecosystems, challenges persist in recognising their value, aligning performance metrics and providing avenues for career progression and job security. The challenges encompass a mismatch between classic academic career paths and service‐oriented roles, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the value and impact of Imaging Scientists and core facilities and how to evaluate them properly. They further include challenges around sustainability, dedicated training opportunities and the recruitment and retention of talent. Structured across these interrelated sections, the recommendations within this publication aim to propose globally applicable solutions to navigate these challenges. These recommendations apply equally to colleagues working in other core facilities and research institutions through which access to technologies is facilitated and supported. This publication emphasises the pivotal role of Imaging Scientists in advancing research programs and presents a blueprint for fostering their career progression within institutions all around the world.
          , 
            LAY DESCRIPTION
            In the exciting world of scientific research, imaging core facilities are essential hubs where scientists use advanced technologies to conduct experiments and uncover fascinating discoveries. What makes these facilities remarkable is that multiple scientists can access and utilise a variety of instruments for a wide range of multidisciplinary research projects, fostering collaboration and innovation. At the forefront of this scientific adventure are Imaging Scientists, experts who play a crucial role in planning experiments, preparing materials, adapting and acquiring technologies, collecting data, training and supporting researchers, analysing images and forming conclusions. Despite their pivotal contributions, there are challenges in recognising the importance of Imaging Scientists and ensuring they have ample opportunities to advance in their careers. These challenges include a mismatch between the typical academic career path and the unique roles and responsibilities of Imaging Scientists, a lack of widespread understanding of their value plus financial constraints, insufficient training opportunities, and difficulties in attracting and retaining talented individuals. To address these issues, Global BioImaging (GBI; www.globalbioimaging.org) has brought together Imaging Scientists from around the world to develop a generally applicable set of recommendations in three key areas: highlighting the significance and value of Imaging Scientists, making it easier to recruit and retain them, and supporting their ongoing learning and professional growth. A notable concept is to reimagine the traditional separation between academic roles and technical support roles. GBI envisions that these recommendations will not only benefit imaging facilities but also prove valuable for research institutions housing diverse technologies organised into core facilities. Recognising the diverse nature of research performing institutions globally, the GBI community sees this guide as a starting point that will initiate dialogue and instigate change, which should be periodically updated as the needs of Imaging Scientists change. This initial version lays a solid foundation for future enhancements, contributing to the acknowledgement and support of the invaluable work done by Imaging Scientists on a global scale.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Journal of Microscopy},
	author = {Wright, Graham D. and Thompson, Kerry A. and Reis, Yara and Bischof, Johanna and Hockberger, Philip Edward and Itano, Michelle S. and Yen, Lisa and Adelodun, Stephen Taiye and Bialy, Nikki and Brown, Claire M. and Chaabane, Linda and Chew, Teng‐Leong and Chitty, Andrew I. and Cordelières, Fabrice P. and De Niz, Mariana and Ellenberg, Jan and Engelbrecht, Lize and Fabian‐Morales, Eunice and Fazeli, Elnaz and Fernandez‐Rodriguez, Julia and Ferrando‐May, Elisa and Fletcher, Georgina and Galloway, Graham John and Guerrero, Adan and Guimarães, Jander Matos and Jacobs, Caron A. and Jayasinghe, Sachintha and Kable, Eleanor and Kitten, Gregory T and Komoto, Shinya and Ma, Xiaoxiao and Marques, Jéssica Araújo and Millis, Bryan A. and Miranda, Kildare and JohnO'Toole, Peter and Olatunji, Sunday Yinka and Paina, Federica and Pollak, Cora Noemi and Prats, Clara and Pylvänäinen, Joanna W. and Rahmoon, Mai Atef and Reiche, Michael A. and Riches, James Douglas and Rossi, Andres Hugo and Salamero, Jean and Thiriet, Caroline and Terjung, Stefan and Vasconcelos, Aldenora Dos Santos and Keppler, Antje},
	month = jun,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {397--410},
}

Abstract In the dynamic landscape of scientific research, imaging core facilities are vital hubs propelling collaboration and innovation at the technology development and dissemination frontier. Here, we present a collaborative effort led by Global BioImaging (GBI), introducing international recommendations geared towards elevating the careers of Imaging Scientists in core facilities. Despite the critical role of Imaging Scientists in modern research ecosystems, challenges persist in recognising their value, aligning performance metrics and providing avenues for career progression and job security. The challenges encompass a mismatch between classic academic career paths and service‐oriented roles, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the value and impact of Imaging Scientists and core facilities and how to evaluate them properly. They further include challenges around sustainability, dedicated training opportunities and the recruitment and retention of talent. Structured across these interrelated sections, the recommendations within this publication aim to propose globally applicable solutions to navigate these challenges. These recommendations apply equally to colleagues working in other core facilities and research institutions through which access to technologies is facilitated and supported. This publication emphasises the pivotal role of Imaging Scientists in advancing research programs and presents a blueprint for fostering their career progression within institutions all around the world. , LAY DESCRIPTION In the exciting world of scientific research, imaging core facilities are essential hubs where scientists use advanced technologies to conduct experiments and uncover fascinating discoveries. What makes these facilities remarkable is that multiple scientists can access and utilise a variety of instruments for a wide range of multidisciplinary research projects, fostering collaboration and innovation. At the forefront of this scientific adventure are Imaging Scientists, experts who play a crucial role in planning experiments, preparing materials, adapting and acquiring technologies, collecting data, training and supporting researchers, analysing images and forming conclusions. Despite their pivotal contributions, there are challenges in recognising the importance of Imaging Scientists and ensuring they have ample opportunities to advance in their careers. These challenges include a mismatch between the typical academic career path and the unique roles and responsibilities of Imaging Scientists, a lack of widespread understanding of their value plus financial constraints, insufficient training opportunities, and difficulties in attracting and retaining talented individuals. To address these issues, Global BioImaging (GBI; www.globalbioimaging.org) has brought together Imaging Scientists from around the world to develop a generally applicable set of recommendations in three key areas: highlighting the significance and value of Imaging Scientists, making it easier to recruit and retain them, and supporting their ongoing learning and professional growth. A notable concept is to reimagine the traditional separation between academic roles and technical support roles. GBI envisions that these recommendations will not only benefit imaging facilities but also prove valuable for research institutions housing diverse technologies organised into core facilities. Recognising the diverse nature of research performing institutions globally, the GBI community sees this guide as a starting point that will initiate dialogue and instigate change, which should be periodically updated as the needs of Imaging Scientists change. This initial version lays a solid foundation for future enhancements, contributing to the acknowledgement and support of the invaluable work done by Imaging Scientists on a global scale.

@article{boltes_be_2024,
	title = {Be {FAIR} to {Pedestrian} {Dynamics} {Data}},
	volume = {9},
	url = {http://collective-dynamics.eu/index.php/cod/article/view/A163},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Collective Dynamics},
	author = {Boltes, Maik and Kandler, Alica},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {1--8},
}

@article{de-marcos_mapping_2024,
	title = {Mapping science through editorial board interlocking: connections and distance between fields of knowledge and institutional affiliations},
	issn = {0138-9130, 1588-2861},
	shorttitle = {Mapping science through editorial board interlocking},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-024-05027-x},
	doi = {10.1007/s11192-024-05027-x},
	abstract = {Abstract
            Research is a global enterprise underpinned by the general belief that findings need to be true to be considered scientific. In the complex system of scientific validation, editorial boards (EBs) play a fundamental role in guiding journals’ review process, which has led many stakeholders of sciences to metaphorically picture them as the “gatekeepers of knowledge.” In an attempt to address the academic structure that governs sciences through editorial board interlocking (EBI, the cross-presence of EB members in different journals) and social network analysis, the aim of this study is threefold: first, to map the connection between fields of knowledge through EBI; second, to visualize and empirically test the distance between social and general sciences; and third, to uncover the institutional structure (i.e., universities) that governs these connections. Our findings, based on the dataset collected through the Open Editors initiative for the journals indexed in the JCR, revealed a substantial level of collaboration between all fields, as suggested by the connections between EBs. However, there is a statistically significant difference between the weight of the edges and the path lengths connecting the fields of natural sciences to the fields of social sciences (compared to the connections within), indicating the development of different research cultures and invisible colleges in these two research areas. The results also show that a central group of US institutions dominates most journal EBs, indirectly suggesting that US scientific norms and values still prevail in all fields of knowledge. Overall, our study suggests that scientific endeavor is highly networked through EBs.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Scientometrics},
	author = {de-Marcos, Luis and Goyanes, Manuel and Domínguez-Díaz, Adrián},
	month = may,
	year = {2024},
}

Abstract Research is a global enterprise underpinned by the general belief that findings need to be true to be considered scientific. In the complex system of scientific validation, editorial boards (EBs) play a fundamental role in guiding journals’ review process, which has led many stakeholders of sciences to metaphorically picture them as the “gatekeepers of knowledge.” In an attempt to address the academic structure that governs sciences through editorial board interlocking (EBI, the cross-presence of EB members in different journals) and social network analysis, the aim of this study is threefold: first, to map the connection between fields of knowledge through EBI; second, to visualize and empirically test the distance between social and general sciences; and third, to uncover the institutional structure (i.e., universities) that governs these connections. Our findings, based on the dataset collected through the Open Editors initiative for the journals indexed in the JCR, revealed a substantial level of collaboration between all fields, as suggested by the connections between EBs. However, there is a statistically significant difference between the weight of the edges and the path lengths connecting the fields of natural sciences to the fields of social sciences (compared to the connections within), indicating the development of different research cultures and invisible colleges in these two research areas. The results also show that a central group of US institutions dominates most journal EBs, indirectly suggesting that US scientific norms and values still prevail in all fields of knowledge. Overall, our study suggests that scientific endeavor is highly networked through EBs.

@article{xu_rethinking_2024,
	title = {Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: {The} case of the {Chinese} context},
	issn = {0898-9621, 1545-5815},
	shorttitle = {Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2024.2349115},
	doi = {10.1080/08989621.2024.2349115},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	journal = {Accountability in Research},
	author = {Xu, Shaoxiong Brian and Hu, Guangwei},
	month = may,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {1--24},
}

@article{trtovac_ecris_2024,
	title = {e{Наука}–{CRIS} у Србији},
	volume = {23},
	issn = {2217-9461},
	url = {https://infoteka.bg.ac.rs/ojs/index.php/Infoteka/article/view/299},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2024-04-22},
	journal = {Infotheca - Journal for Digital Humanities},
	author = {Trtovac, Aleksandra and Marković, Svetozar and Stanković, Ranka},
	month = apr,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {83--99},
}

@misc{langham-putrow_university_2024,
	title = {University of {Minnesota} {Libraries} {Response} to “{Notice} of {Second} {Interested} {Party} {Feedback} {Period} {Regarding} {Increasing} {Public} {Access} to the {Results} of {USDA}-{Funded} {Research}”(2024)},
	url = {https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/261246},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-02-26},
	author = {Langham-Putrow, Allison and Farrell, Shannon and Marsolek, Wanda and Hunt, Shanda},
	year = {2024},
}

@misc{schultz_evaluating_2024,
	address = {University of Kentucky},
	title = {Evaluating a {PI} {Policy} with {Data}},
	url = {https://uknowledge.uky.edu/research_events2/19/},
	abstract = {At our organizations, policies are often implemented then never reviewed again. We often don’t know why the policy existed in the first place. In this session, we will discuss how the data we already collect can be used to evaluate existing policies, proposed policies, and potential changes. We will walk through an example of how a proposed institutional policy was examined through the use of data on research proposals and awards, and answer the question “Do we really need this policy?” Bring your examples to talk through options for policy evaluation!},
	urldate = {2024-04-16},
	author = {Schultz, Lori Ann M.},
	year = {2024},
}

At our organizations, policies are often implemented then never reviewed again. We often don’t know why the policy existed in the first place. In this session, we will discuss how the data we already collect can be used to evaluate existing policies, proposed policies, and potential changes. We will walk through an example of how a proposed institutional policy was examined through the use of data on research proposals and awards, and answer the question “Do we really need this policy?” Bring your examples to talk through options for policy evaluation!

@article{johnston_seek_2024,
	title = {Seek and you may (not) find: {A} multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared},
	volume = {19},
	shorttitle = {Seek and you may (not) find},
	url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302426},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2024-04-30},
	journal = {PloS one},
	author = {Johnston, Lisa R. and Hofelich Mohr, Alicia and Herndon, Joel and Taylor, Shawna and Carlson, Jake R. and Ge, Lizhao and Moore, Jennifer and Petters, Jonathan and Kozlowski, Wendy and Hudson Vitale, Cynthia},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA},
	pages = {e0302426},
}

@article{hutchison_state_2024,
	title = {State of the {Data}: {Assessing} the {FAIRness} of {US} {Geological} {Survey} {Data}},
	volume = {23},
	copyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0},
	issn = {1683-1470},
	shorttitle = {State of the {Data}},
	url = {https://account.datascience.codata.org/index.php/up-j-dsj/article/view/1624},
	doi = {10.5334/dsj-2024-022},
	abstract = {In response to recent shifts towards open science that emphasize transparency, reproducibility, and access to research data, the US Geological Survey (USGS) conducted a study to assess the degree to which USGS data assets meet the FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). The USGS designed and applied a methodology for quantitative analysis of FAIR characteristics. A new rubric was derived from a crosswalk of existing FAIR evaluation frameworks and customized for the USGS. The rubric, consisting of 62 yes/no questions, was applied to 392 metadata records of USGS data products published between 1987 and 2022. Results were analyzed to show which FAIR characteristics were most and least present in the metadata and how these scores changed after the implementation of data policy requirements in 2016. Aggregated scores showed specific areas of strength and needed improvements. The greatest increases in FAIR scores over time were for elements that were required by new data policies, especially in the ‘Findable’ category. Based on the results, this paper presents strategies to further improve USGS alignment with FAIR. The suggested strategies are organized in four key areas: USGS data repository characteristics, training and communities of practice, data management policy considerations, and metadata standards, tools, and best practices.},
	urldate = {2024-04-30},
	journal = {Data Science Journal},
	author = {Hutchison, Vivian B. and Norkin, Tamar and Zolly, Lisa S. and Hsu, Leslie},
	month = apr,
	year = {2024},
	pages = {22},
}

In response to recent shifts towards open science that emphasize transparency, reproducibility, and access to research data, the US Geological Survey (USGS) conducted a study to assess the degree to which USGS data assets meet the FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). The USGS designed and applied a methodology for quantitative analysis of FAIR characteristics. A new rubric was derived from a crosswalk of existing FAIR evaluation frameworks and customized for the USGS. The rubric, consisting of 62 yes/no questions, was applied to 392 metadata records of USGS data products published between 1987 and 2022. Results were analyzed to show which FAIR characteristics were most and least present in the metadata and how these scores changed after the implementation of data policy requirements in 2016. Aggregated scores showed specific areas of strength and needed improvements. The greatest increases in FAIR scores over time were for elements that were required by new data policies, especially in the ‘Findable’ category. Based on the results, this paper presents strategies to further improve USGS alignment with FAIR. The suggested strategies are organized in four key areas: USGS data repository characteristics, training and communities of practice, data management policy considerations, and metadata standards, tools, and best practices.

@article{stromert_guidance_2024,
	title = {Guidance on how to use the {IUPAC} {Gold} {Book} as a canonical source for textual definitions in chemical ontologies},
	url = {https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/6612d62e91aefa6ce10b9ae2},
	urldate = {2024-04-22},
	author = {Strömert, Philip and Hunold, Johannes and Chalk, Stuart and McEwen, Leah and Koepler, Oliver},
	year = {2024},
}

@article{habermann_sustainable_2024,
	title = {Sustainable {Connectivity} in a {Community} {Repository}},
	url = {https://direct.mit.edu/dint/article/doi/10.1162/dint_a_00252/120635},
	urldate = {2024-04-22},
	journal = {Data Intelligence},
	author = {Habermann, Ted},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA journals-info …},
	pages = {1--36},
}

@misc{lefton_collabnext-person-focused_2024,
	title = {{CollabNext}-{A} {Person}-{Focused} {Open} {Knowledge} {Graph} for {Collaborations} with {Emerging} {Researchers}},
	url = {https://uknowledge.uky.edu/research_events2/18/},
	abstract = {CollabNext is being developed as part of the NSF ProtoOKN (Prototype Open Knowledge Network) effort. This project originated as a partnership between Georgia Tech and the Atlanta University Center, and is now being developed jointly by Fisk University, Georgia Tech, Morehouse College, Texas Southern University, and University at Buffalo with support from the NSF TIP Directorate.

Our goal is to develop a knowledge graph based on people, organizations, and research topics. We are adopting an intentional design approach which initially prioritizes HBCUs and emerging researchers in a deliberate effort to counterbalance the Matthew effect, a naturally accumulated advantage of well-resourced research organizations. By bringing greater visibility to what and who is often rendered invisible in the current science system, CollabNext will facilitate research collaborations with HBCUs and other MSIs, and illuminate the broader research landscape.

Our goal is to utilize open science data sources, follow human-centered design principles, and leverage state-of-the-art algorithms to build a platform that will help identify existing and cultivate new research partnerships that include emerging research institutions.},
	urldate = {2024-04-16},
	author = {Lefton, Lew},
	year = {2024},
}

CollabNext is being developed as part of the NSF ProtoOKN (Prototype Open Knowledge Network) effort. This project originated as a partnership between Georgia Tech and the Atlanta University Center, and is now being developed jointly by Fisk University, Georgia Tech, Morehouse College, Texas Southern University, and University at Buffalo with support from the NSF TIP Directorate. Our goal is to develop a knowledge graph based on people, organizations, and research topics. We are adopting an intentional design approach which initially prioritizes HBCUs and emerging researchers in a deliberate effort to counterbalance the Matthew effect, a naturally accumulated advantage of well-resourced research organizations. By bringing greater visibility to what and who is often rendered invisible in the current science system, CollabNext will facilitate research collaborations with HBCUs and other MSIs, and illuminate the broader research landscape. Our goal is to utilize open science data sources, follow human-centered design principles, and leverage state-of-the-art algorithms to build a platform that will help identify existing and cultivate new research partnerships that include emerging research institutions.

@article{vukolov_dpids-emerging_2024,
	title = {{dPIDs}-the {Emerging} {Persistent} {Identification} {Technology} for {FAIR} and the {Digital} {Era}},
	url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrei-Vukolov/publication/379500795_dPIDs_-_the_Emerging_Persistent_Identification_Technology_for_FAIR_and_the_Digital_Era/links/660c0be2b839e05a20b7ec2d/dPIDs-the-Emerging-Persistent-Identification-Technology-for-FAIR-and-the-Digital-Era.pdf},
	urldate = {2024-04-10},
	author = {Vukolov, Andrey and van Winkle, Erik and Zhdanova, Elizaveta and Kourousias, Georgios},
	month = apr,
	year = {2024},
}

@article{menger_guidelines_2024,
	title = {Guidelines for completing the {ADVANCE} metadata form: a {FAIR} enabling resource for biodiversity monitoring data},
	volume = {5},
	shorttitle = {Guidelines for completing the {ADVANCE} metadata form},
	url = {https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/125149/download/pdf/},
	urldate = {2024-04-16},
	journal = {ARPHA Preprints},
	author = {Menger, Juliana and Magagna, Barbara and Henle, Klaus and Harpke, Alexander and Frenzel, Mark and Rick, Johannes and Wiltshire, Karen and Grimm-Seyfarth, Annegret},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Pensoft Publishers},
	pages = {e125149},
}

@article{silva_brcris_2024,
	title = {{BrCris}: tools for treatment, analysis, and dissemination of scientific information in support of {Open} {Science} in {Brazil}},
	volume = {21},
	issn = {1678-765X, 1678-765X},
	shorttitle = {{BrCris}},
	url = {https://www.scielo.br/j/rdbci/a/dCLJVgJ6hM84tp8RsVHmZhR/?lang=en},
	doi = {10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8673171/en},
	abstract = {RESUMO Introdução: Os sistemas CRIS constituem-se em sistemas de informação abrangentes sobre todo o ecossistema do processo científico. O BrCris tem como propósito integrar e organizar informações referentes a atividades de pesquisa, projetos, publicações, pesquisadores, instituições, financiamentos e outros dados relevantes no contexto científico brasileiro. Objetivo: Este estudo visa discutir o processamento dos dados na Plataforma BrCris e analisar as ferramentas computacionais empregadas para essa finalidade, explorando três abordagens principais: integração e consistência dos dados, visualização e validação, além da certificação dos dados. Metodologia: O estudo se configura como descritivo, apresentando em detalhes as etapas de tratamento de dados do BrCris, discutindo os desafios encontrados no manuseio de grandes volumes de informações. Além disso, descreve o ferramental computacional utilizado para o tratamento das informações científicas e tecnológicas. Resultados: O estudo revela os procedimentos para o tratamento de dados e as ferramentas computacionais desenvolvidas para os sistemas informacionais, bem como a integração e análise dos dados obtidos. São apresentados os resultados do tratamento e modelagem das informações baseadas no VIVO, com dados e painéis gráficos, e as oportunidades de reutilização dos dados gerados. Também é detalhada a integração dos dados em um repositório autodeclarado (Lattes) e no repositório agregador de teses e dissertações (Oasisbr), culminando na emissão de um selo de certificação. Conclusão: Os resultados evidenciam que a adoção dessas ferramentas computacionais proporciona um acesso facilitado e ágil a um extenso conjunto de informações consolidadas, previamente dispersas em várias fontes, especialmente devido à diversidade de repositórios e limitações de acesso individualizados. Assim, este estudo apresenta um conjunto de ferramentas computacionais cujas funcionalidades estão alinhadas com as diretrizes da Ciência Aberta no Brasil.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-04-11},
	journal = {RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação},
	author = {Silva, Vivian dos Santos and Silva, Jesiel Viana da and Dias, Thiago Magela Rodrigues and Gabriel Junior, Renê Faustino and Segundo, Washington Luís Ribeiro de Carvalho},
	month = apr,
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Universidade Estadual de Campinas},
	keywords = {BrCris, Data repositories, Information processing, Open science, Scientific data},
	pages = {e023027},
}

RESUMO Introdução: Os sistemas CRIS constituem-se em sistemas de informação abrangentes sobre todo o ecossistema do processo científico. O BrCris tem como propósito integrar e organizar informações referentes a atividades de pesquisa, projetos, publicações, pesquisadores, instituições, financiamentos e outros dados relevantes no contexto científico brasileiro. Objetivo: Este estudo visa discutir o processamento dos dados na Plataforma BrCris e analisar as ferramentas computacionais empregadas para essa finalidade, explorando três abordagens principais: integração e consistência dos dados, visualização e validação, além da certificação dos dados. Metodologia: O estudo se configura como descritivo, apresentando em detalhes as etapas de tratamento de dados do BrCris, discutindo os desafios encontrados no manuseio de grandes volumes de informações. Além disso, descreve o ferramental computacional utilizado para o tratamento das informações científicas e tecnológicas. Resultados: O estudo revela os procedimentos para o tratamento de dados e as ferramentas computacionais desenvolvidas para os sistemas informacionais, bem como a integração e análise dos dados obtidos. São apresentados os resultados do tratamento e modelagem das informações baseadas no VIVO, com dados e painéis gráficos, e as oportunidades de reutilização dos dados gerados. Também é detalhada a integração dos dados em um repositório autodeclarado (Lattes) e no repositório agregador de teses e dissertações (Oasisbr), culminando na emissão de um selo de certificação. Conclusão: Os resultados evidenciam que a adoção dessas ferramentas computacionais proporciona um acesso facilitado e ágil a um extenso conjunto de informações consolidadas, previamente dispersas em várias fontes, especialmente devido à diversidade de repositórios e limitações de acesso individualizados. Assim, este estudo apresenta um conjunto de ferramentas computacionais cujas funcionalidades estão alinhadas com as diretrizes da Ciência Aberta no Brasil.

@misc{fahl_sempubflow_2024,
	title = {{SemPubFlow}: a novel {Scientific} {Publishing} {Workflow} using {Knowledge} {Graphs}, {Wikidata} and {LLMs}–the {CEUR}-{WS} use case},
	shorttitle = {{SemPubFlow}},
	url = {https://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj3657.pdf},
	urldate = {2024-03-19},
	author = {Fahl, Wolfgang and Holzheim, Tim and Lange, Christoph and Decker, Stefan},
	month = mar,
	year = {2024},
}

@book{dreker_building_2024,
	title = {Building {Your} {Academic} {Research} {Digital} {Identity}: {A} {Step}-{Wise} {Guide} to {Cultivating} {Your} {Academic} {Research} {Career} {Online}},
	shorttitle = {Building {Your} {Academic} {Research} {Digital} {Identity}},
	url = {https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_WD8EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=%22Research+Organization+Registry%22&ots=b0PD7PkI9X&sig=8qIysvqYX6BUrwx42yTUuyjRXWU},
	abstract = {The purpose of this timely and stimulating book is to thoroughly prepare students, early researchers, and career scholars in establishing their digital identity online. Broadly defined, digital identity is one’s online history – that is, it is any trail a person has left in his or her life that is now online. In academics, the issue is of digital presence is of utmost importance, as a digital identity frames one’s professional reputation, doing so by promoting and defining a person’s knowledge and research in their respective field. Written by an accomplished interdisciplinary team of scholars in library science and related fields, this unique guide addresses the development of professional identity as a continuous, dynamic process that is constantly evolving, generally starting from university study and moving through one’s professional work life. It goes without saying that building your digital identity as a researcher can be an effective way to publicize your work among your peers, but, the authors emphasize, this activity must be done carefully and skillfully. Indeed, developing these skills can forge a path to professional advancement in hiring, promotion, and tenure. Moreover, a well-designed digital presence can help build networks which can lead to collaborations, increased research, and grants. In addition, having a well-managed digital identity helps an academic engage with the public by strategically disseminating one’s knowledge to students, public, and the media. Importantly, it can also help prevent misinformation. Whether readers are new in the field of research and publishing, or have a well-established portfolio of written literature, this handy title will provide vital guidance in establishing a digital presence, covering a wide range of issues. Key topics discussed, for example, include academic digital platforms and tools to consider when using them, working with academic librarians, social media platforms, choosing digital identity management tools like Open Researcher and Contributor ID or ORCID, the importance of author metrics and the h-index, and maintaining and curating a professional website, to name just several areas discussed. An invaluable contribution to the career literature, Building Your Academic Research Digital Identity will enable readers to strategically understand all the tools, platforms, and metrics needed to establish and cultivate one’s crucially important digital profile.},
	urldate = {2024-04-01},
	publisher = {Springer Nature},
	author = {Dreker, Margaret Rush},
	year = {2024},
}

The purpose of this timely and stimulating book is to thoroughly prepare students, early researchers, and career scholars in establishing their digital identity online. Broadly defined, digital identity is one’s online history – that is, it is any trail a person has left in his or her life that is now online. In academics, the issue is of digital presence is of utmost importance, as a digital identity frames one’s professional reputation, doing so by promoting and defining a person’s knowledge and research in their respective field. Written by an accomplished interdisciplinary team of scholars in library science and related fields, this unique guide addresses the development of professional identity as a continuous, dynamic process that is constantly evolving, generally starting from university study and moving through one’s professional work life. It goes without saying that building your digital identity as a researcher can be an effective way to publicize your work among your peers, but, the authors emphasize, this activity must be done carefully and skillfully. Indeed, developing these skills can forge a path to professional advancement in hiring, promotion, and tenure. Moreover, a well-designed digital presence can help build networks which can lead to collaborations, increased research, and grants. In addition, having a well-managed digital identity helps an academic engage with the public by strategically disseminating one’s knowledge to students, public, and the media. Importantly, it can also help prevent misinformation. Whether readers are new in the field of research and publishing, or have a well-established portfolio of written literature, this handy title will provide vital guidance in establishing a digital presence, covering a wide range of issues. Key topics discussed, for example, include academic digital platforms and tools to consider when using them, working with academic librarians, social media platforms, choosing digital identity management tools like Open Researcher and Contributor ID or ORCID, the importance of author metrics and the h-index, and maintaining and curating a professional website, to name just several areas discussed. An invaluable contribution to the career literature, Building Your Academic Research Digital Identity will enable readers to strategically understand all the tools, platforms, and metrics needed to establish and cultivate one’s crucially important digital profile.

@article{heseler_grundlagen_2024,
	title = {Grundlagen der digitalen {Langzeitarchivierung}},
	url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matthias-Arnold/publication/378766749_Grundlagen_der_digitalen_Langzeitarchivierung_NFDI4Culture_-Task_Area_4_-Datenpublikation_und_Langzeitarchivierung/links/65e88a6bc3b52a11701b8a71/Grundlagen-der-digitalen-Langzeitarchivierung-NFDI4Culture-Task-Area-4-Datenpublikation-und-Langzeitarchivierung.pdf},
	urldate = {2024-03-19},
	author = {Heseler, Jörg and Büttner, Alexandra},
	month = jan,
	year = {2024},
}

@article{rempel_padronizacao_2024,
	title = {Padronização do nome institucional : um estudo sobre as universidades brasileiras},
	copyright = {Open Access},
	shorttitle = {Padronização do nome institucional},
	url = {https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/274218},
	abstract = {A afiliação institucional é um importante dado indicado por pesquisadores em suas publicações científicas. Através dessa informação é possível recuperar as publicações e realizar estudos e análises da produção das universidades. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo investigar se as universidades brasileiras adotam políticas para padronização das informações que envolvem o nome institucional. A variação da grafia do nome institucional ocorre devido à falta de orientação aos pesquisadores e pela variedade de formas que um mesmo nome pode ser escrito quando não há padronização. A falta de padronização reflete na indexação das publicações pelas bases de dados e em estudos que utilizam essas bases como fonte de pesquisa. Para compreender o impacto e importância da afiliação institucional, foi exposto na seção de referencial teórico pontos sobre a afiliação institucional e a padronização de nomes institucionais, a afiliação institucional em bases de dados e a afiliação institucional em rankings universitários. Para atingir os objetivos, foi realizada uma pesquisa exploratória com abordagem qualitativa, onde investigou-se se as universidades brasileiras, presentes no ranking ARWU de 2023, possuem alguma normativa ou instrução referente a padronização do nome da universidade para fins de afiliação. Em caso afirmativo, foi feita a coleta e análise das normativas ou instruções encontradas para identificar a orientação. Nos resultados, observou-se que os rankings universitários ARWU, Leiden, QS e THE utilizam diferentes indicadores de avaliação cujos dados são recuperados pela afiliação institucional. Em caso afirmativo, foi feita a coleta e análise das normativas ou instruções encontradas para identificar a orientação. Nos resultados, observou-se que os rankings universitários ARWU, Leiden, QS e THE utilizam diferentes indicadores de avaliação cujos dados são recuperados pela afiliação institucional. Quanto às 18 universidades brasileiras ranqueadas no ARWU 2023, apenas 10 possuem uma normativa ou instrução acerca da padronização do nome institucional, sendo 7 universidades com nome padrão estabelecido e informado em documento oficial, e 3 universidades com recomendações informais. O formato da publicação e o setor da universidade responsável pela publicação variam, porém, 6 das 10 universidades estabeleceram orientações sobre o nome padrão nos últimos três anos. O conteúdo das publicações tende a ser mais objetivo, com poucas universidades adicionando informações além da indicação do nome institucional; porém as justificativas apresentadas para a padronização do nome deixam claro a importância de seguir esse padrão. Conclui-se que há necessidade de padronizar o nome institucional, já que é um dado importante para a indexação da produção científica e a realização de pesquisas que a utilizem. E que as universidades brasileiras estão começando a compreender esse fato e publicar normativas que tratam desse assunto. Apesar disso, ainda é necessário um maior engajamento das universidades e o desenvolvimento de pesquisas e debates que abordem a padronização do nome institucional. Para tanto, foram elencadas algumas atividades de curadoria do nome institucional que o bibliotecário pode realizar.},
	language = {por},
	urldate = {2024-04-01},
	author = {Rempel, Scheila Raquel},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Accepted: 2024-03-27T06:37:08Z},
}

A afiliação institucional é um importante dado indicado por pesquisadores em suas publicações científicas. Através dessa informação é possível recuperar as publicações e realizar estudos e análises da produção das universidades. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo investigar se as universidades brasileiras adotam políticas para padronização das informações que envolvem o nome institucional. A variação da grafia do nome institucional ocorre devido à falta de orientação aos pesquisadores e pela variedade de formas que um mesmo nome pode ser escrito quando não há padronização. A falta de padronização reflete na indexação das publicações pelas bases de dados e em estudos que utilizam essas bases como fonte de pesquisa. Para compreender o impacto e importância da afiliação institucional, foi exposto na seção de referencial teórico pontos sobre a afiliação institucional e a padronização de nomes institucionais, a afiliação institucional em bases de dados e a afiliação institucional em rankings universitários. Para atingir os objetivos, foi realizada uma pesquisa exploratória com abordagem qualitativa, onde investigou-se se as universidades brasileiras, presentes no ranking ARWU de 2023, possuem alguma normativa ou instrução referente a padronização do nome da universidade para fins de afiliação. Em caso afirmativo, foi feita a coleta e análise das normativas ou instruções encontradas para identificar a orientação. Nos resultados, observou-se que os rankings universitários ARWU, Leiden, QS e THE utilizam diferentes indicadores de avaliação cujos dados são recuperados pela afiliação institucional. Em caso afirmativo, foi feita a coleta e análise das normativas ou instruções encontradas para identificar a orientação. Nos resultados, observou-se que os rankings universitários ARWU, Leiden, QS e THE utilizam diferentes indicadores de avaliação cujos dados são recuperados pela afiliação institucional. Quanto às 18 universidades brasileiras ranqueadas no ARWU 2023, apenas 10 possuem uma normativa ou instrução acerca da padronização do nome institucional, sendo 7 universidades com nome padrão estabelecido e informado em documento oficial, e 3 universidades com recomendações informais. O formato da publicação e o setor da universidade responsável pela publicação variam, porém, 6 das 10 universidades estabeleceram orientações sobre o nome padrão nos últimos três anos. O conteúdo das publicações tende a ser mais objetivo, com poucas universidades adicionando informações além da indicação do nome institucional; porém as justificativas apresentadas para a padronização do nome deixam claro a importância de seguir esse padrão. Conclui-se que há necessidade de padronizar o nome institucional, já que é um dado importante para a indexação da produção científica e a realização de pesquisas que a utilizem. E que as universidades brasileiras estão começando a compreender esse fato e publicar normativas que tratam desse assunto. Apesar disso, ainda é necessário um maior engajamento das universidades e o desenvolvimento de pesquisas e debates que abordem a padronização do nome institucional. Para tanto, foram elencadas algumas atividades de curadoria do nome institucional que o bibliotecário pode realizar.

@misc{punktauteur_quand_2024,
	title = {Quand {IdRef} s’aligne sur {ROR}, ou comment rapprocher des référentiels},
	url = {https://punktokomo.abes.fr/2024/03/20/quand-idref-saligne-sur-ror-ou-comment-rapprocher-des-referentiels/},
	abstract = {Le blog technique de l'Abes},
	language = {fr-FR},
	urldate = {2024-03-27},
	journal = {PUNKTOKOMO},
	author = {Punktauteur},
	month = mar,
	year = {2024},
}

Le blog technique de l'Abes

@misc{asha_cross_2023,
	title = {Cross {Domain} {Interoperability} {Framework} ({CDIF}): {Discovery} {Module} (v01 draft for public consultation)},
	shorttitle = {Cross {Domain} {Interoperability} {Framework} ({CDIF})},
	url = {https://codata.org/cross-domain-interoperability-framework-cdif-discovery-module-v01-draft-for-public-consultation/},
	abstract = {In support of the WorldFAIR project and other activities to improve the implementation of the FAIR principles, the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) Working Group is producing a suite of recommendations and guidelines.  The CDIF will include modules for various aspects of the FAIR principles, including discovery (this module), data integration, semantic harmonization, data access, and […]},
	language = {en-GB},
	urldate = {2024-07-15},
	journal = {CODATA, The Committee on Data for Science and Technology},
	author = {Asha},
	month = dec,
	year = {2023},
}

In support of the WorldFAIR project and other activities to improve the implementation of the FAIR principles, the Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) Working Group is producing a suite of recommendations and guidelines.  The CDIF will include modules for various aspects of the FAIR principles, including discovery (this module), data integration, semantic harmonization, data access, and […]

@article{elger_fid_2023,
	title = {{FID} {GEO} latest: {Research} {Organization} {Registry} ({ROR})},
	volume = {GMIT 91},
	copyright = {CC::CC BY 4.0},
	shorttitle = {{FID} {GEO} latest},
	url = {https://e-docs.geo-leo.de/handle/11858/11252},
	doi = {10.23689/fidgeo-5834},
	abstract = {[...] ROR stands for Research 
Organization Registry and is an open 
registry for research organizations. The registry is 
developed and operated as a joint initiative of the 
California Digital Library, Crossref and DataCite. ROR 
already references more than 103,000 organizations, 
ranging from universities and extramural research 
institutions to government agencies, research funders 
and government departments. [...] 
This publication is a translation of the FID GEO article in {\textless}a href="http://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5750"{\textgreater}GMIT 91.{\textless}/a{\textgreater}},
	language = {eng},
	urldate = {2023-12-19},
	journal = {Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen GMIT},
	author = {Elger, Kirsten and Lorenz, Melanie},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Accepted: 2023-12-04T14:21:31Z},
	pages = {20--21},
}

[...] ROR stands for Research Organization Registry and is an open registry for research organizations. The registry is developed and operated as a joint initiative of the California Digital Library, Crossref and DataCite. ROR already references more than 103,000 organizations, ranging from universities and extramural research institutions to government agencies, research funders and government departments. [...] This publication is a translation of the FID GEO article in \textlessa href="http://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-5750"\textgreaterGMIT 91.\textless/a\textgreater

@phdthesis{hardtke_automatische_2023,
	title = {Automatische {Integration} von erweiterten {Metadaten} zu {Autor}:innen wissenschaftlicher {Artikel} in {Wikidata}},
	copyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.de},
	shorttitle = {Automatische {Integration} von erweiterten {Metadaten} zu {Autor}},
	url = {https://publiscologne.th-koeln.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2058},
	abstract = {Wikidata ist eine frei zugängliche Plattform, die von Menschen und Maschinen bearbeitet werden kann. Um zu verstehen, wie die Plattform funktioniert und wie die Daten miteinander verknüpft sind, beschäftigt sich diese Bachelorarbeit mit dem Import von Orcid-autor:innen- und The Research Organization Registry (RoR)-Organisationsdaten in Wikidata und den Möglichkeiten, diesen Prozess zu automatisieren. Um dies herauszufinden, wurden verschiedene Ansätze untersucht, beschrieben beziehungsweise getestet. Beispiele sind der Wikidata Integrator, SPAQRL und Quickstatements. Die Tests wurden durchgeführt, indem einzelne Datensätze auf unterschiedliche Weise durch die Tools gelaufen wurden. Die Tools mit den größten Erfolgsaussichten waren Wikidata-integrator und Quickstatements. Beide ermöglichen das Hochladen von Daten per Skript. Wobei Quickstatements auch eine manuelle Eingabe der Daten ermöglicht, sofern sie als Quickstatements strukturiert sind. Das Ziel der Arbeit war, es die Autor:innen Metadatei „Affiliation“ auf Wikidata zu integrieren. Dies ist schlussendlich aus verschiedenen Gründen nicht gelungen. Diese werden ausführlich in den Problemen und Ergebnissen beschrieben. Als alternative wurde der RoR-Datensatz verwendet, um die Organisationsmetadaten „established“ auf Wikidata gepusht.},
	language = {deu},
	urldate = {2023-10-26},
	school = {Institut für Informationswissenschaft der Technische Hochschule Köln},
	author = {Hardtke, Markus},
	year = {2023},
}

Wikidata ist eine frei zugängliche Plattform, die von Menschen und Maschinen bearbeitet werden kann. Um zu verstehen, wie die Plattform funktioniert und wie die Daten miteinander verknüpft sind, beschäftigt sich diese Bachelorarbeit mit dem Import von Orcid-autor:innen- und The Research Organization Registry (RoR)-Organisationsdaten in Wikidata und den Möglichkeiten, diesen Prozess zu automatisieren. Um dies herauszufinden, wurden verschiedene Ansätze untersucht, beschrieben beziehungsweise getestet. Beispiele sind der Wikidata Integrator, SPAQRL und Quickstatements. Die Tests wurden durchgeführt, indem einzelne Datensätze auf unterschiedliche Weise durch die Tools gelaufen wurden. Die Tools mit den größten Erfolgsaussichten waren Wikidata-integrator und Quickstatements. Beide ermöglichen das Hochladen von Daten per Skript. Wobei Quickstatements auch eine manuelle Eingabe der Daten ermöglicht, sofern sie als Quickstatements strukturiert sind. Das Ziel der Arbeit war, es die Autor:innen Metadatei „Affiliation“ auf Wikidata zu integrieren. Dies ist schlussendlich aus verschiedenen Gründen nicht gelungen. Diese werden ausführlich in den Problemen und Ergebnissen beschrieben. Als alternative wurde der RoR-Datensatz verwendet, um die Organisationsmetadaten „established“ auf Wikidata gepusht.

@article{primo-pena_identificadores_2023,
	title = {Identificadores persistentes de revista, de autor, de objeto digital o de {Institución} ({ISSN}, {ORCID}, {DOI}, {ISNI}, {ROR}, etc.)},
	url = {https://repisalud.isciii.es/handle/20.500.12105/16723},
	urldate = {2024-06-20},
	author = {Primo-Peña, Elena},
	year = {2023},
}

@phdthesis{smolka_trajni_2023,
	type = {{PhD} {Thesis}},
	title = {Trajni identifikatori},
	url = {https://repozitorij.unios.hr/islandora/object/ffos:6618},
	urldate = {2024-06-20},
	school = {Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Faculty of Humanities and …},
	author = {Smolka, Lucija},
	year = {2023},
}

@misc{barsky_doisrors_2023,
	title = {{DOIs}/{RORs} at the {University} of {British} {Columbia}},
	url = {https://doi.library.ubc.ca/10.14288/1.0436877},
	doi = {10.14288/1.0436877},
	abstract = {[Presentation for the DataCite Annual Community Conference 2023]},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-04-01},
	author = {Barsky, Eugene},
	collaborator = {{University Of British Columbia}},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Publisher: [object Object]
Version Number: 1},
}

[Presentation for the DataCite Annual Community Conference 2023]

@article{trtovac_enaukacris_nodate,
	title = {{eNauka}–{CRIS} in {Serbia}},
	url = {https://infoteka.bg.ac.rs/ojs/index.php/Infoteka/article/view/2023.23.2.5_en},
	urldate = {2024-05-21},
	author = {Trtovac, Aleksandra and Marković, Svetozar and Stanković, Ranka},
}