BibBase https://api.zotero.org/users/4976940/collections/IFDGH43L/items?key=HB5ooAZGCiqh7e2wvqkMNOn0&format=bibtex&limit=100

Freeman, J. (1)

Jason Freeman. Syntactic analysis of the "so don't I" construction. In Miguel Rodríguez-Mondoñedo; and M. Emma Ticio., editor(s), Cranberry linguistics 2, of University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, pages 25–38. Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 2004.
link bibtex

@incollection{freeman_syntactic_2004,
	address = {Storrs, CT},
	series = {University of {Connecticut} {Working} {Papers} in {Linguistics}},
	title = {Syntactic analysis of the "so don't {I}" construction},
	language = {English},
	number = {12},
	booktitle = {Cranberry linguistics 2},
	publisher = {Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut},
	author = {Freeman, Jason},
	editor = {Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel and Ticio, M. Emma},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {So don't I},
	pages = {25--38},
}

Horn, L. (3)

Laurence R. Horn. Multiple negation in English and other languages. In Laurence Horn., editor(s), The expression of negation, pages 111–148. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague, 2010.
link bibtex

@incollection{horn_multiple_2010,
	address = {The Hague},
	title = {Multiple negation in {English} and other languages},
	booktitle = {The expression of negation},
	publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter},
	author = {Horn, Laurence R.},
	editor = {Horn, Laurence},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {So don't I},
	pages = {111--148},
}

Laurence R. Horn. Some aspects of negation. In Joseph H. Greenberg; Charles A. Ferguson; and Edith A. Moravcsik., editor(s), Universals of human language, volume 4 (Syntax), pages 127–210. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1978.
link bibtex

@incollection{horn_aspects_1978,
	address = {Stanford, CA},
	title = {Some aspects of negation},
	volume = {4 (Syntax)},
	booktitle = {Universals of human language},
	publisher = {Stanford University Press},
	author = {Horn, Laurence R.},
	editor = {Greenberg, Joseph H. and Ferguson, Charles A. and Moravcsik, Edith A.},
	year = {1978},
	keywords = {Language and languages, Linguistics, Positive anymore, So don't I},
	pages = {127--210},
}

Laurence R. Horn. Hypernegation, hyponegation: Gluts, gaps, and parole violations. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), 35(1): 403–423. 2009.
link bibtex

@article{horn_hypernegation_2009,
	title = {Hypernegation, hyponegation: {Gluts}, gaps, and parole violations},
	volume = {35},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS)},
	author = {Horn, Laurence R.},
	year = {2009},
	keywords = {Positive anymore, So don't I},
	pages = {403--423},
}

Labov, W. (1)

William Labov. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language, 48(4): 773–818. 1972.
doi link bibtex abstract 17 downloads

@article{labov_negative_1972,
	title = {Negative attraction and negative concord in {English} grammar},
	volume = {48},
	issn = {0097-8507},
	doi = {10.2307/411989},
	abstract = {The attraction of the negative to subject any is an invariant rule for all dialects of English, and appears to respond to the distributive and hypothetical features of this indeterminate. Negative concord, on the other hand, is a variable rule which distributes the negative rightward in response to affective factors. It is progressively extended from one dialect to another in an implicational series which initiates negation in new positions as the rule approaches obligatory status in the original environments.},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Language},
	author = {Labov, William},
	year = {1972},
	keywords = {Negative concord, Negative inversion, So don't I},
	pages = {773--818},
}

Lawler, J. (1)

John M. Lawler. Ample negatives. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 10: 357 – 377. January 1974.
link bibtex abstract

@article{lawler_ample_1974,
	title = {Ample negatives},
	volume = {10},
	issn = {0577-7240},
	abstract = {An analysis accounting for sentences possessing an abnormal number of negatives in their surface structure is offered. Several types of sentences are represented in this class. The ways in which these sentences are abnormal is discussed 1st. The question of why such sentences occur at all is examined, \& it is established that it is very important to communicate negation. Phenomena like polarity items \& 'non-standard' multiple negation exist, among other reasons, to increase redundance \& insure that the negative message gets communicated. One further way is to impose a constraint on surface structures that allows negatives to be retained in surface structure when they would ordinarily be deleted. The constraint is that if the negative that would ordinarily command the element is moved out, another must be provided in the proper relationship. J. Schwarz},
	language = {English},
	journal = {Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS)},
	author = {Lawler, John M.},
	month = jan,
	year = {1974},
	keywords = {Deep Structure and Surface Structure (de3), Negative Statement (ne1), Semantics (se9), So don't I, Syntax (sy3), analysis of sentences with abnormal number of negatives, article},
	pages = {357 -- 377},
}

Pappas, D. (1)

Dino Angelo Pappas. A sociolinguistic and historical investigation of "so don't I". In Miguel Rodríguez-Mondoñedo; and M. Emma Ticio., editor(s), Cranberry linguistics 2, of University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics, pages 53–62. Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 2004.
link bibtex

@incollection{pappas_sociolinguistic_2004,
	address = {Storrs, CT},
	series = {University of {Connecticut} {Working} {Papers} in {Linguistics}},
	title = {A sociolinguistic and historical investigation of "so don't {I}"},
	language = {English},
	number = {12},
	booktitle = {Cranberry linguistics 2},
	publisher = {Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut},
	author = {Pappas, Dino Angelo},
	editor = {Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel and Ticio, M. Emma},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {So don't I},
	pages = {53--62},
}

Peterson, B. (1)

Britt Peterson. ‘So don’t I,’ from Shakespeare to modern New England. The Boston Globe. 2015.

‘So don’t I,’ from Shakespeare to modern New England [link]

Paper link bibtex

@article{peterson_so_2015,
	title = {‘{So} don’t {I},’ from {Shakespeare} to modern {New} {England}},
	url = {https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2015/08/01/don-from-shakespeare-modern-new-england/9k4zBPffWurbwdmThCaNrK/story.html},
	journal = {The Boston Globe},
	author = {Peterson, Britt},
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {So don't I},
}

Wood, J. (2)

Jim Wood. So-inversion as polarity focus. In Michael Grosvald; and Dianne Soares., editor(s), Proceedings of the thirty-eighth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2008), volume 19, pages 304–317. California State University, Fresno, 2008.
link bibtex

@incollection{wood_so-inversion_2008,
	address = {Fresno},
	title = {So-inversion as polarity focus},
	volume = {19},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the thirty-eighth {Western} {Conference} on {Linguistics} ({WECOL} 2008)},
	publisher = {California State University},
	author = {Wood, Jim},
	editor = {Grosvald, Michael and Soares, Dianne},
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {So don't I},
	pages = {304--317},
}

Jim Wood. Affirmative semantics with negative morphosyntax: Negative exclamatives and the New England So AUXn't NP/DP construction. In Raffaella Zanuttini; and Laurence R. Horn., editor(s), Micro-syntactic variation in North American English, of Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages 71–114. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.
link bibtex

@incollection{wood_affirmative_2014,
	address = {Oxford},
	series = {Oxford {Studies} in {Comparative} {Syntax}},
	title = {Affirmative semantics with negative morphosyntax: {Negative} exclamatives and the {New} {England} {So} {AUXn}'t {NP}/{DP} construction},
	booktitle = {Micro-syntactic variation in {North} {American} {English}},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	author = {Wood, Jim},
	editor = {Zanuttini, Raffaella and Horn, Laurence R.},
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {English language, So don't I, Syntax, Variation},
	pages = {71--114},
}