@incollection{betti_bolzano_2019,
	address = {Pittsburgh},
	title = {Bolzano in {Ones} and {Zeros} [provisory title] [commissioned for volume under contract]},
	booktitle = {The {Dynamics} of {Science}: {Computational} {Frontiers} in {History} and {Philosophy} of {Science}},
	publisher = {Pittsburgh University Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van Wierst, Pauline and Bellomo, Anna and Oortwijn, Yvette and Bloem, Jelke and van den Berg, Hein},
	editor = {Ramsey, Grant and de Block, Andreas},
	year = {2019}
}

@incollection{betti_note_2019,
	address = {Amsterdam/New York, NY},
	series = {Poznań {Studies} in the {Philosophy} of the {Sciences} and the {Humanities}},
	title = {A {Note} on {Early} {Polish} {Semantics}, {Bolzano} and the {Woleński} {Thesis} [in proofs since 2005; revised proofs submitted on {Aug} 12, 2016]},
	url = {https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=8E8B912431DFEA03!13083&authkey=!AGOu6udBMKPtxXs&ithint=file%2cpdf},
	booktitle = {Essays for {Jan} {Woleński}},
	publisher = {Brill/Rodopi},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Werner, Konrad},
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {Bolzano}
}

@article{castermans_solarview:_2018,
	title = {{SolarView}: {Low} {Distortion} {Radial} {Embeddings} with a {Focus} [accepted on {Aug} 1, 2018]},
	author = {Castermans, Thom and Verbeek, Kevin and Koopman, Rob and Speckmann, Bettina and Westenberg, Michel A. and Wang, Shenghui and van den Berg, Hein and Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2018}
}

@incollection{betti_history_2018,
	address = {London},
	series = {Advances in {Experimental} {Philosophy}},
	title = {History of {Philosophy} in {Ones} and {Zeros} [accepted; edited copy approved by authors on {Jun} 30, 2018]},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOiPQPfvyIMWp368QySA},
	abstract = {How can we best reconstruct the origin of a notion, its development, and possible spread to multiple fields? We present a pilot study on the spread of the notion of conceptual scheme. Though the notion is philosophically important, its origin, development, and spread are unclear. Several purely qualitative and competing historical hypotheses have been offered, which rely on disconnected disciplinary traditions, and have never been tested all at once in a single comprehensive investigation fitting the scope of its subject matter. As a step toward such an investigation, we trace the use of the bigram “conceptual scheme” in about 42,000 US journal articles in social sciences from 1888-1959 by using a novel method combining a quantitative procedure aided by basic computational techniques with qualitative elements informed by Betti and van den Berg (2014)’s ‘model approach to the history of ideas’.},
	booktitle = {Methodological {Advances} in {Experimental} {Philosophy}},
	publisher = {Bloomsbury},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein and Oortwijn, Yvette and Treijtel, Caspar},
	editor = {Curtis, Mark and Fischer, Eugen},
	year = {2018}
}

How can we best reconstruct the origin of a notion, its development, and possible spread to multiple fields? We present a pilot study on the spread of the notion of conceptual scheme. Though the notion is philosophically important, its origin, development, and spread are unclear. Several purely qualitative and competing historical hypotheses have been offered, which rely on disconnected disciplinary traditions, and have never been tested all at once in a single comprehensive investigation fitting the scope of its subject matter. As a step toward such an investigation, we trace the use of the bigram “conceptual scheme” in about 42,000 US journal articles in social sciences from 1888-1959 by using a novel method combining a quantitative procedure aided by basic computational techniques with qualitative elements informed by Betti and van den Berg (2014)’s ‘model approach to the history of ideas’.

@inproceedings{van_den_berg_ground_2018,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {Ground {Truth} and {Provability} in {Visualisation} {Research} [submitted {July} 10, 2018]},
	author = {van den Berg, Hein and Betti, Arianna and Castermans, Thom and Koopman, Rob and Speckmann, Bettina and Verbeek, Kevin and Wang, Shenghui and van der Werf, Titia and Westenberg, Michel},
	year = {2018}
}

@inproceedings{pauline_van_wierst_bolvis:_2018,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {{BolVis}: {Visualization} for {Text}-based {Research} in {Philosophy} [submitted {July} 10, 2018]},
	author = {{Pauline van Wierst} and Betti, Arianna and Hofstede, Steven and Castermans, Thom and Westenberg, Michel and Oortwijn, Yvette and Wang, Shenghui and Koopman, Rob},
	year = {2018}
}

@techreport{bellomo_bolzanos_2018,
	title = {Bolzano’s semantic space: {Philosophical} investigations using an information retrieval tool [{Abstract}]},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOiO9KUaYXHj-UDy1idw},
	language = {en},
	author = {Bellomo, Anna and van den Berg, Hein and Betti, Arianna and Bloem, Jelke and Koopman, Rob and Oortwijn, Yvette and Wang, Shenghui and van Wierst, Pauline},
	month = apr,
	year = {2018}
}

@inproceedings{zamborlini_toward_2017,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Toward a {Core} {Conceptual} {Model} for ({Im})material {Cultural} {Heritage} in the {Golden} {Agents} project - {Storyfying} data},
	isbn = {1613-0073},
	url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2063/events-paper1.pdf},
	abstract = {This paper reports on the initial idea of a core conceptual model
for the Golden Agents Project, which aims to integrate several heterogeneous
datasets about cultural heritage of the Dutch Golden
Age. We hypothesize that the combination of event and storytelling
modeling would provide us a common infrastructure to represent
and retrieve some core information regardless to its specific nature:
painting, book, notary act or theatre performance. The proposed
model was developed based on (i) several discussions conducted
with humanities experts and (ii) foundational ontology for grounding
the modeling decisions. It is assessed through a case study
about Vermeer, the painting ‘Girl with a Pearl Earring’ and a novel
written about the production of the painting. We conclude that
the model satisfactorily addresses the case study, and we discuss
some next steps to further assess and extend the model, as well as
implementing and testing it in practice.},
	booktitle = {{SEMANTiCS} 2017 workshop proceedings - {Joint} {Proceedings} of {SEMANTiCS} 2017 {Workshops}  co-located with the 13th {International} {Conference} on {Semantic} {Systems} ({SEMANTiCS} 2017)},
	author = {Zamborlini, Veruska and Betti, Arianna and van den Heuvel, Charles},
	editor = {Fensel, Anna and Daniele, Laura and Aroyo, Lora and de Boer, Victor and Inel, Oana and Kuys, Gerard and Petram, Lodewijk},
	year = {2017}
}

This paper reports on the initial idea of a core conceptual model for the Golden Agents Project, which aims to integrate several heterogeneous datasets about cultural heritage of the Dutch Golden Age. We hypothesize that the combination of event and storytelling modeling would provide us a common infrastructure to represent and retrieve some core information regardless to its specific nature: painting, book, notary act or theatre performance. The proposed model was developed based on (i) several discussions conducted with humanities experts and (ii) foundational ontology for grounding the modeling decisions. It is assessed through a case study about Vermeer, the painting ‘Girl with a Pearl Earring’ and a novel written about the production of the painting. We conclude that the model satisfactorily addresses the case study, and we discuss some next steps to further assess and extend the model, as well as implementing and testing it in practice.

@incollection{betti_philostei:_2017,
	address = {London},
	title = {@{PhilosTEI}: {Building} {Corpora} for {Philosophers}},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bbi.32},
	abstract = {The step to e-research in philosophy depends on the availability of high quality, easily and freely accessible corpora in a sustainable format composed from multi-language, multi-script books from different historical periods. Corpora matching these needs are at the moment virtually non-existing. Within @PhilosTei, we have addressed this corpus building problem by developing an open source, web-based, user-friendly workflow from textual images to TEI, based on state-of-the-art open source OCR software, to wit Tesseract, and a multi-language version of TICCL, a powerful OCR post-correction tool. We have demonstrated the utility of the tool by applying it to a multilingual, multi-script corpus of important eighteenth to twentieth-century European philosophical texts.},
	booktitle = {{CLARIN} in the {Low} {Countries}},
	publisher = {Ubiquity Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Reynaert, Martin and van den Berg, Hein},
	editor = {Odijk, Jan and van Hessen, Arjan},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {371--384}
}

The step to e-research in philosophy depends on the availability of high quality, easily and freely accessible corpora in a sustainable format composed from multi-language, multi-script books from different historical periods. Corpora matching these needs are at the moment virtually non-existing. Within @PhilosTei, we have addressed this corpus building problem by developing an open source, web-based, user-friendly workflow from textual images to TEI, based on state-of-the-art open source OCR software, to wit Tesseract, and a multi-language version of TICCL, a powerful OCR post-correction tool. We have demonstrated the utility of the tool by applying it to a multilingual, multi-script corpus of important eighteenth to twentieth-century European philosophical texts.

@incollection{betti_brentano_2017,
	address = {London},
	title = {Brentano and the {Lvov}-{Warsaw} {School}},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOgZJyRogFR4bkdEm9qw},
	booktitle = {The {Routledge} {Handbook} of {Franz} {Brentano} and the {Brentano} {School}},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Kriegel, Uriah},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {334--340}
}

@incollection{betti_brentano_2017-1,
	address = {London},
	title = {Brentano and {Twardowski}},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOgZJ0T7aOhOoo0qCFuw},
	booktitle = {The {Routledge} {Handbook} of {Franz} {Brentano} and the {Brentano} {School}},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Kriegel, Uriah},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {305--311}
}

@inproceedings{betti_towards_2016,
	address = {Aachen},
	title = {Towards a {Computational} {History} of {Ideas}},
	volume = {1681},
	url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1681/Betti_van_den_Berg_computational_history_of_ideas.pdf},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the {Third} {Conference} on {Digital} {Humanities} in {Luxembourg} with a {Special} {Focus} on {Reading} {Historical} {Sources} in the {Digital} {Age}. {CEUR} {Workshop} {Proceedings}, {CEUR}-{WS}.org},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	editor = {Wieneke, Lars and Jones, Catherine and Düring, Marten and Armaselu, Florentina and Leboutte, René},
	year = {2016}
}

@inproceedings{castermans_glammap:_2016,
	address = {Baltimore},
	title = {{GlamMap}: {Geovisualization} for e-humanities},
	url = {http://vis4dh.com/papers/GlamMap%20Geovisualization%20for%20e-Humanities.pdf},
	abstract = {Abstract—This paper presents GlamMap, a visualization tool for large, multi-variate georeferenced humanities data sets. Our approach visualizes the data as glyphs on a zoomable geographic map, and performs clustering and data aggregation at each zoom level to avoid clutter and to prevent overlap of symbols. GlamMap was developed for the Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums (GLAM) domain in cooperation with researchers in philosophy. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach by a case study on history of logic, which involves navigation and exploration of 7100 bibliographic records, and scalability on a data set of sixty million book records.},
	booktitle = {2016 {Workshop} on {Visualization} for the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	author = {Castermans, Thom and Speckmann, Bettina and Verbeek, Kevin and Westenberg, Michel and Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	year = {2016},
	note = {bibtex: castermans\_glammap:\_2016}
}

Abstract—This paper presents GlamMap, a visualization tool for large, multi-variate georeferenced humanities data sets. Our approach visualizes the data as glyphs on a zoomable geographic map, and performs clustering and data aggregation at each zoom level to avoid clutter and to prevent overlap of symbols. GlamMap was developed for the Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums (GLAM) domain in cooperation with researchers in philosophy. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach by a case study on history of logic, which involves navigation and exploration of 7100 bibliographic records, and scalability on a data set of sixty million book records.

@inproceedings{betti_glammapping_2016,
	address = {Melbourne},
	title = {{GlamMapping} {Trove}},
	url = {http://www.vala.org.au/direct-download/vala2016-proceedings/vala2016-papers/590-vala2016-session-8-betti-paper/file},
	abstract = {This paper presents the current state of development of GlamMap, a visualisation tool that displays library metadata on an interactive, computer-generated geographic map. The focus in the paper is on the most crucial improvement achieved in the development of the tool: GlamMapping Trove. The visualisation of Trove’s sixty-million book records is possible thanks to an improved database structure, more efficient data retrieval, and more scalable visualisation algorithms. The paper analyses problems encountered in visualising massive datasets, describes remaining challenges for the tool, and presents a use case demonstrating GlamMap’s ability to serve researchers in the history of ideas.},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of {VALA} 2016},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Castermans, Thom and Speckmann, Bettina and van den Berg, Hein and Verbeek, Kevin},
	year = {2016}
}

This paper presents the current state of development of GlamMap, a visualisation tool that displays library metadata on an interactive, computer-generated geographic map. The focus in the paper is on the most crucial improvement achieved in the development of the tool: GlamMapping Trove. The visualisation of Trove’s sixty-million book records is possible thanks to an improved database structure, more efficient data retrieval, and more scalable visualisation algorithms. The paper analyses problems encountered in visualising massive datasets, describes remaining challenges for the tool, and presents a use case demonstrating GlamMap’s ability to serve researchers in the history of ideas.

@inproceedings{van_wierst_philscale:_2016,
	address = {Aachen},
	title = {Phil@{Scale}: {Computational} {Methods} within {Philosophy}},
	volume = {1681},
	url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1681/Wierst_et_al_Philo_at_scale.pdf},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the {Third} {Conference} on {Digital} {Humanities} in {Luxembourg} with a {Special} {Focus} on {Reading} {Historical} {Sources} in the {Digital} {Age}. {CEUR} {Workshop} {Proceedings}, {CEUR}-{WS}.org},
	author = {van Wierst, Pauline and Vrijenhoek, Sanne and Schlobach, Stefan and Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Wieneke, Lars and Jones, Catherine and Düring, Marten and Armaselu, Florentina and Leboutte, René},
	year = {2016}
}

@incollection{betti_einleitung_2016,
	address = {Berlin/New York},
	title = {Einleitung zur {Logik} 1894/5},
	booktitle = {Kazimierz {Twardowski} - {Logik}: {Wiener} {Logikkolleg}},
	publisher = {de Gruyter},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Raspa, Venanzio},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {vii--xxxviii}
}

@article{betti_kazimierz_2016,
	title = {Kazimierz {Twardowski} (substantial revision, {May} 17, 2016)},
	url = {http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/twardowski/},
	number = {Winter},
	journal = {Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2016}
}

@book{betti_kazimierz_2016-1,
	address = {Berlin, New York},
	title = {Kazimierz {Twardowski} - {Logik}: {Wiener} {Logikkolleg}},
	publisher = {de Gruyter},
	editor = {Betti, Arianna and Raspa, Venanzio},
	year = {2016}
}

@book{betti_against_2015,
	address = {Cambridge, MA},
	title = {Against facts},
	isbn = {978-0-262-02921-6},
	publisher = {MIT Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2015}
}

@article{betti_modelling_2014,
	title = {Modelling the {History} of {Ideas}},
	volume = {22},
	url = {w},
	abstract = {We propose a new method for the history of ideas that has none of the shortcomings so often ascribed to this approach. We call this method the model approach to the history of ideas. We argue that any adequately developed and implementable method to trace (dis)continuities in the history of human thought, or concept drift, will require that historians use explicit interpretive conceptual frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We argue that models enhance the comprehensibility of historical texts, and provide historians of ideas with a method that, unlike existing approaches, is susceptible neither to common holistic criticisms nor to Skinner’s objections that the history of ideas yields arbitrary and biased reconstructions. To illustrate our proposal, we discuss the so-called Classical Model of Science and draw upon work in computer science and cognitive psychology.},
	number = {4},
	journal = {British Journal for the History of Philosophy},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {812--835}
}

We propose a new method for the history of ideas that has none of the shortcomings so often ascribed to this approach. We call this method the model approach to the history of ideas. We argue that any adequately developed and implementable method to trace (dis)continuities in the history of human thought, or concept drift, will require that historians use explicit interpretive conceptual frameworks. We call these frameworks models. We argue that models enhance the comprehensibility of historical texts, and provide historians of ideas with a method that, unlike existing approaches, is susceptible neither to common holistic criticisms nor to Skinner’s objections that the history of ideas yields arbitrary and biased reconstructions. To illustrate our proposal, we discuss the so-called Classical Model of Science and draw upon work in computer science and cognitive psychology.

@article{betti_haslangers_2014,
	title = {On {Haslanger}’s {Focal} {Analysis} of {Race} and {Gender} in {Resisting} {Reality} as an {Interpretive} {Model}},
	volume = {1},
	url = {http://krisis.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/krisis-2014-1-03-betti.pdf},
	journal = {Krisis},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {13--18}
}

@techreport{betti_philostei:_2014,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {@{PhilosTEI}: {Final} user evaluation report},
	url = {http://1drv.ms/20NhO3n},
	abstract = {This deliverable reports on the evaluation of the workflow developed in TiCCLing Philosophy: a TEI corpus building workflow towards a new computational methodology for philosophy (@PhilosTEI). Within @PhilosTEI, a demonstrator tool providing a web-based workflow from textual images to TEI has been created and evaluated. In this document, we present the evaluation of this workflow based on the user testing conducted within the project.},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	month = nov,
	year = {2014},
	pages = {15}
}

This deliverable reports on the evaluation of the workflow developed in TiCCLing Philosophy: a TEI corpus building workflow towards a new computational methodology for philosophy (@PhilosTEI). Within @PhilosTEI, a demonstrator tool providing a web-based workflow from textual images to TEI has been created and evaluated. In this document, we present the evaluation of this workflow based on the user testing conducted within the project.

@techreport{betti_philostei:_2014-1,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {@{PhilosTEI}: user scenario},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van den Berg, Hein},
	month = nov,
	year = {2014},
	pages = {1}
}

@incollection{betti_naming_2014,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {The {Naming} of {Facts} and the {Methodology} of {Language}-{Based} {Metaphysics}},
	url = {http://www.philosophie.ch/kevin/festschrift/Betti-paper},
	abstract = {According to Mulligan \& Correia 2008, "any philosophy of facts owes us an account of the form of such expressions as "the fact that Sam is sad". They also suggest that expressions of the form "the fact that p" have the form of definite descriptions, and that one possible account of such expressions as definite descriptions is the one given by Hochberg 2001. According to Hochberg, 'the fact that p' is analysed as 'the fact that contains a as a term and F as an attribute and that is of the form ϕx exists'. Why should we ask that any philosophy of facts be equipped with names for facts (or, more neutrally, with ways to refer to facts)? A descriptive metaphysician accepting facts might care about the naming of facts; but I do not see why a revisionary metaphysician should: I do not see whether a revisionary metaphysician accepting facts should care even as to whether it is at all possible to name them. A fortiori, for a revisionary metaphysician there does not seem to be any need for the expression 'the fact that p' to come out as a definite description. So it seems that the only philosophers for whom Hochberg's analysis is relevant are those who think that linguistic analyses of that kind can be used in support of a philosophy of facts independently of theoretical considerations. But this, I argue, is misguided: since it presupposes a specific philosophy of facts from the start, Hochberg's analysis can't be used in support of that very philosophy or of any other philosophy of facts. Hochberg, H. 2001. The Positivist and the Ontologist. Bergmann, Carnap and Logical Realism, Amsterdam: Rodopi. Mulligan, Kevin and Correia, Fabrice, "Facts", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = {\textless}http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/facts/{\textgreater}.},
	booktitle = {{MIND}, {VALUES} {AND} {METAPHYSICS}: {PHILOSOPHICAL} {PAPERS} {DEDICATED} {TO} {KEVIN} {MULLIGAN}},
	publisher = {Springer},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Reboul, Anne},
	year = {2014}
}

According to Mulligan & Correia 2008, "any philosophy of facts owes us an account of the form of such expressions as "the fact that Sam is sad". They also suggest that expressions of the form "the fact that p" have the form of definite descriptions, and that one possible account of such expressions as definite descriptions is the one given by Hochberg 2001. According to Hochberg, 'the fact that p' is analysed as 'the fact that contains a as a term and F as an attribute and that is of the form ϕx exists'. Why should we ask that any philosophy of facts be equipped with names for facts (or, more neutrally, with ways to refer to facts)? A descriptive metaphysician accepting facts might care about the naming of facts; but I do not see why a revisionary metaphysician should: I do not see whether a revisionary metaphysician accepting facts should care even as to whether it is at all possible to name them. A fortiori, for a revisionary metaphysician there does not seem to be any need for the expression 'the fact that p' to come out as a definite description. So it seems that the only philosophers for whom Hochberg's analysis is relevant are those who think that linguistic analyses of that kind can be used in support of a philosophy of facts independently of theoretical considerations. But this, I argue, is misguided: since it presupposes a specific philosophy of facts from the start, Hochberg's analysis can't be used in support of that very philosophy or of any other philosophy of facts. Hochberg, H. 2001. The Positivist and the Ontologist. Bergmann, Carnap and Logical Realism, Amsterdam: Rodopi. Mulligan, Kevin and Correia, Fabrice, "Facts", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = \textlesshttp://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/facts/\textgreater.

@inproceedings{betti_glammap:_2014,
	address = {Melbourne},
	title = {{GlamMap}: visualizing library metadata},
	url = {http://bit.ly/1oWsPcj},
	abstract = {Libraries provide access to large amounts of library metadata. Unfortunately, many libraries only offer textual interfaces for searching and browsing their holdings. Visualizations provide simpler, faster, and more efficient ways to navigate, search and study large quantities of metadata. This paper presents GlamMap, a visualization tool that displays library metadata on an interactive, computer-generated geographic map. We provide detailed discussion of how GlamMap benefits the work of librarians and researchers. We show how geographic representations help librarians to perform tasks such as collection assessment and how geographic information helps researchers to identify important scientific resources.},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of {VALA} 2014 – {Libraries}, {Technologies}, and the {Future}},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Gerrits, Dirk H. P. and Speckmann, Bettina and van den Berg, Hein},
	year = {2014}
}

Libraries provide access to large amounts of library metadata. Unfortunately, many libraries only offer textual interfaces for searching and browsing their holdings. Visualizations provide simpler, faster, and more efficient ways to navigate, search and study large quantities of metadata. This paper presents GlamMap, a visualization tool that displays library metadata on an interactive, computer-generated geographic map. We provide detailed discussion of how GlamMap benefits the work of librarians and researchers. We show how geographic representations help librarians to perform tasks such as collection assessment and how geographic information helps researchers to identify important scientific resources.

@incollection{betti_sniewski_2013,
	address = {Basingstoke},
	title = {Leśniewski, {Tarski} and the {Axioms} of {Mereology}},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOgaIw6WWbbwffw1VYxQ},
	booktitle = {Studies in the {History} and {Philosophy} of {Polish} {Logic}. {Essays} in {Honour} of {Jan} {Woleński}},
	publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Kijania-Placek, Katarzyna and Mulligan, Kevin and Placek, Tomasz},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {242--258}
}

@incollection{betti_we_2013,
	address = {Basingstoke},
	title = {We owe it to {Sigwart}! {A} new look at the content/object distinction in early phenomenological theories of judgment from {Brentano} to {Twardowski}},
	url = {https://www.dropbox.com/s/cie2ocxapsbqx7r/BettiTextorJudgementVolume.pdf?dl=0},
	booktitle = {Judgement and {Truth} in {Early} {Analytic} {Philosophy} and {Phenomenology}},
	publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Textor, Mark},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {74--96}
}

@incollection{betti_bolzanos_2012,
	address = {Oxford},
	title = {Bolzano’s {Universe}: {Truth}, {Logic} and {Metaphysics}},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOsFrbsytkO6dh2jGO},
	booktitle = {Categories of {Being}: {Essays} on {Metaphysics} and {Logic}},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Haaparanta, Leila and Koskinen, Heikki J.},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {167--190}
}

@article{betti_tarskis_2012,
	title = {On {Tarski}’s {Foundations} of the {Geometry} of {Solids}},
	volume = {18},
	url = {https://www.dropbox.com/s/lk9oj5bd6eo482f/Betti%2C%20Loeb%20-%202012%20-%20On%20Tarski%E2%80%99s%20Foundations%20of%20the%20Geometry%20of%20Solids%282%29.pdf?dl=0},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Bulletin of Symbolic Logic},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Loeb, Iris},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {230--260}
}

@article{betti_contro_2012,
	title = {Contro i fatti},
	volume = {49},
	abstract = {This paper argues that the hypothesis that there are facts is ungrounded. I first introduce a series of important theoretical distinctions to say what facts are not – and avoid misunderstandings as to what I take to be facts, states of affairs and relations. Then I present the so-called problem of the glue, which is linked to Bradley's regress. Finally, I propose a stronger version of the problem of the glue, which I call the problem of directional glue, to the aim of giving additional evidence that the problem of the glue is not solvable by the theories of facts which fall prey of it.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Rivista di estetica},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {55--72}
}

This paper argues that the hypothesis that there are facts is ungrounded. I first introduce a series of important theoretical distinctions to say what facts are not – and avoid misunderstandings as to what I take to be facts, states of affairs and relations. Then I present the so-called problem of the glue, which is linked to Bradley's regress. Finally, I propose a stronger version of the problem of the glue, which I call the problem of directional glue, to the aim of giving additional evidence that the problem of the glue is not solvable by the theories of facts which fall prey of it.

@article{betti_classical_2011,
	title = {The {Classical} {Model} of {Science} {II} – {The} {Axiomatic} {Method}, the {Order} of {Concepts} and the {Hierarchy} of {Science}: {An} {Introduction}},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/m40715u7752q7512/ http://axiom.vu.nl/cmsone/index2.htm},
	doi = {10.1007/s11229-009-9671-0},
	journal = {Synthese},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and de Jong, Willem R and Martijn, Marije},
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {Bolzano}
}

@article{betti_explanation_2010,
	title = {Explanation in metaphysics and {Bolzano}’s theory of ground and consequence},
	volume = {211},
	url = {http://virthost.vub.ac.be/lnaweb/ojs/index.php/LogiqueEtAnalyse/article/view/1755},
	journal = {Logique et analyse},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {Bolzano, Classical Model of Science},
	pages = {281--316}
}

@article{de_jong_classical_2010,
	title = {The {Classical} {Model} of {Science} {I} – {A} {Millennia}-{Old} {Model} of {Scientific} {Rationality}},
	volume = {174},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/0039-7857/174/2/ https://www.surfgroepen.nl/sites/cmsone/cmsoneweb/index.html},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Synthese},
	author = {de Jong, Willem R and Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {Classical, Model, Science, of}
}

@article{betti_introduction_2010,
	title = {Introduction},
	volume = {174},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/04821q71p1306231 http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl//handle/1871/19644},
	doi = {10.1007/s11229-008-9416-5},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Synthese},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and de Jong, Willem R},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {Classical, Model, Science, of},
	pages = {181--3}
}

@article{betti_sniewskis_2010,
	title = {Leśniewski’s characteristica universalis},
	volume = {174},
	issn = {00397857},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11229-008-9423-6 http://hdl.handle.net/1871/19645},
	doi = {10.1007/s11229-008-9423-6},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Synthese},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {Classical Model of Science, axiomatics, characteristica universalis, classical model science, logic, s systems, sniewski},
	pages = {295--314}
}

@article{betti_kazimierz_2010,
	title = {Kazimierz {Twardowski}},
	url = {http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/twardowski/},
	number = {Fall},
	journal = {Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2010}
}

@incollection{betti_sniewskis_2009,
	address = {Berlin},
	title = {Leśniewski’s {Systems} and the {Aristotelian} {Model} of {Science}},
	url = {https://1drv.ms/b/s!AgPq3zEkkYuOgtxqb2ci6qXPb7YHDA},
	booktitle = {The {Golden} {Age} of {Polish} {Philosophy} - {Kazimierz} {Twardowski}’s philosophical legacy},
	publisher = {Springer Verlag},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Lapointe, Sandra and Marion, Mathieu and Miśkiewicz, Wioletta and Woleński, Jan},
	year = {2009},
	note = {10.1007/978-90-481-2401-5\_7},
	pages = {93--111}
}

@article{betti_review_2009,
	title = {Review of {Nadine} {Gessler}, {Leśniewski}, lecteur de {Frege}. {Neuchâtel}: 2007.},
	volume = {30},
	url = {http://hdl.handle.net/1871/19643},
	number = {2},
	journal = {History and Philosophy of Logic},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {200--201}
}

@incollection{betti_polish_2008,
	title = {Polish {Axiomatics} and its {Truth} : {On} {Tarski}'s {Lesniewskian} {Background} and the {Ajdukiewicz} {Connection}},
	booktitle = {New {Essays} on {Tarski} and {Philosophy}},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Patterson, Douglas},
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {Classical, Model, Science, of},
	pages = {44--72}
}

@article{wieland_relata-specific_2008,
	title = {Relata-{Specific} {Relations}: {A} {Response} to {Vallicella}},
	volume = {62},
	issn = {1746-8361},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01167.x},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01167.x},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Dialectica},
	author = {Wieland, Jan Willem and Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2008},
	note = {bibtex: DLTC:DLTC1167},
	pages = {509--524}
}

@incollection{betti_against_2006,
	address = {Warsaw},
	title = {Against facts [{Przeciwko} faktom]},
	booktitle = {Myśli o jȩzyku, nauce i wartościach. {Ksiȩga} ofiarowana {Profesorowi} {Jackowi} {Juliuszowi} {Jadackiemu} w sześćdziesiata rocznicȩ urodzin},
	publisher = {Semper},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Strawiński, Witold and Brożek, Anna and Grygianiec, Mariusz},
	year = {2006},
	note = {published in Polish as ‘Przeciwko Faktom’. English original to be found here URL = {\textless} http://www.surfgroepen.nl/personal/ariannabetti/shared\%20documents/betti2006.pdf {\textgreater}},
	pages = {235--249}
}

@incollection{betti_sempiternal_2006,
	address = {Amsterdam and New York},
	series = {Poznan {Studies} in the {Philosophy} of the {Sciences} and the {Humanities}},
	title = {Sempiternal {Truth}. {The} {Bolzano}-{Leśniewski}-{Twardowski} {Axis}},
	url = {http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/10868/3_SempiternalTruth.pdf?sequence=1},
	number = {89},
	booktitle = {Lvov-{Warsaw} {School}: {The} {New} {Generation}},
	publisher = {Rodopi},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Jadacki, Jacek Juliusz and Pasniczek, J.},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {371--399}
}

@incollection{betti_strange_2006,
	address = {Frankfurt am Main},
	title = {The {Strange} {Case} of {Savonarola} and the {Painted} {Fish}. {On} the {Bolzanization} of {Polish} {Thought}},
	url = {http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/13144},
	booktitle = {Actions, {Products} and {Things}. {Brentano} and {Polish} {Philosophy}},
	publisher = {Ontos Verlag},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Chrudzimski, A. and Łukasiewicz, D.},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {55--81}
}

@incollection{betti_contre_2006,
	address = {Paris},
	title = {Contre les faits},
	booktitle = {Propositions et états de choses – {Entre} être et sens},
	publisher = {Vrin},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Benoist, Jocelyn},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {231--50}
}

@article{betti_propositions_2005,
	title = {Propositions et états de choses chez {Twardowski}},
	volume = {XLIV},
	url = {http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/10870},
	journal = {Dialogue},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {469--492}
}

@article{betti_argomenti_2005,
	title = {Argomenti ontologici genuini e oggetti intenzionali. {Commento} a {Alberto} {Voltolini}},
	volume = {30},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Rivista di estetica},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {86--90}
}

@article{betti_road_2004,
	title = {The {Road} from {Vienna} to {Lvov} {Twardowski}'s {Theory} of {Judgement} between 1894 and 1897},
	volume = {67},
	url = {http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/10869/4_RoadViennaLvov.pdf?sequence=1},
	abstract = {In several manuscripts, written between 1894 and 1897, Twardowski developed a new theory of judgment with two types of judgment: existential and relational judgments. In Zur Lehre he tried to stay within a Brentanian framework, although he introduced the distinction between content and object in the theory of judgment. The introduction of this distinction forced Twardowski to revise further Brentano's theory. His changes concerned judgments about relations and about nonpresent objects. The latter are considered special cases of relational judgments. The existential judgments are analyzed in a Brentanian way. (edited)},
	journal = {Grazer Philosophische Studien},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and van der Schaar, Maria},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {brentano, epistemology, judgment, k, relation, twardowski},
	pages = {1--20}
}

In several manuscripts, written between 1894 and 1897, Twardowski developed a new theory of judgment with two types of judgment: existential and relational judgments. In Zur Lehre he tried to stay within a Brentanian framework, although he introduced the distinction between content and object in the theory of judgment. The introduction of this distinction forced Twardowski to revise further Brentano's theory. His changes concerned judgments about relations and about nonpresent objects. The latter are considered special cases of relational judgments. The existential judgments are analyzed in a Brentanian way. (edited)

@article{betti_lukasiewicz_2004,
	title = {Lukasiewicz and {Leśniewski} on {Contradiction}},
	volume = {22},
	journal = {Reports in Philosophy},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {247--271}
}

@article{betti_lesniewskis_2004,
	title = {Lesniewski's {Early} {Liar}, {Tarski} and {Natural} {Language}},
	volume = {127},
	url = {http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/10871},
	abstract = {This paper shows that it was not Tarski, but Lesniewski who first avowed the impossibility of giving a satisfactory theory of truth for ordinary language, and the necessity of sanitation of the latter for scientific purposes. In an early article (1913) Lesniewski gave an interesting solution to the liar paradox, which, although different from Tarski's in detail, is nevertheless important to Tarski's semantic background. To illustrate this I give an analysis of Lesniewski's solution and of some related aspects of Lesniewski's later thought. (edited)},
	number = {1-3},
	journal = {Annals of Pure and Applied Logic},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {lesniewski, liar s paradox, logic, metalanguage, s, semantics, tarski, truth},
	pages = {267--287}
}

This paper shows that it was not Tarski, but Lesniewski who first avowed the impossibility of giving a satisfactory theory of truth for ordinary language, and the necessity of sanitation of the latter for scientific purposes. In an early article (1913) Lesniewski gave an interesting solution to the liar paradox, which, although different from Tarski's in detail, is nevertheless important to Tarski's semantic background. To illustrate this I give an analysis of Lesniewski's solution and of some related aspects of Lesniewski's later thought. (edited)

@article{betti_egel_2004,
	title = {De egel en de vos: {Over} logica, taal en waarheid bij {Lesniewski} en {Tarski}},
	volume = {96},
	abstract = {In this programmatic paper, I propose to examine Tarski's work on truth in its historical context, in particular by comparing Tarski's ideas with those of his teacher, Stanislaw Lesniewski. Building on recent findings, I argue that Tarski's ideas on semantics are significantly different from Lesniewski's, and that this difference squares with the opposition sketched in the dichotomies logic as language vs. logic as calculus and language as universal medium vs. language as calculus. I also suggest that a comparison of Lesniewski's and Tarski's position based on this opposition can help us understand and critically assess present-day practices in logic, as well as contribute to the (rather dormant) debate on issues like: can a purely syntactic construction be made meaningful by means of a model-theoretical mapping? If not, what should a logic with a proper semantics look like? (edited)},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {language, lesniewski, logic, s, tarski, truth},
	pages = {208--216}
}

In this programmatic paper, I propose to examine Tarski's work on truth in its historical context, in particular by comparing Tarski's ideas with those of his teacher, Stanislaw Lesniewski. Building on recent findings, I argue that Tarski's ideas on semantics are significantly different from Lesniewski's, and that this difference squares with the opposition sketched in the dichotomies logic as language vs. logic as calculus and language as universal medium vs. language as calculus. I also suggest that a comparison of Lesniewski's and Tarski's position based on this opposition can help us understand and critically assess present-day practices in logic, as well as contribute to the (rather dormant) debate on issues like: can a purely syntactic construction be made meaningful by means of a model-theoretical mapping? If not, what should a logic with a proper semantics look like? (edited)

@incollection{betti_incomplete_2002,
	title = {The {Incomplete} {Story} of {Lukasiewicz} and {Bivalence}},
	url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.554.1591&rep=rep1&type=pdf},
	booktitle = {The {Logica} {Yearbook} 1999},
	publisher = {Filosofia},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {2002},
	keywords = {Probability, bivalence, jan, lukasiewicz, many valued logics},
	pages = {21--36}
}

@incollection{betti_porohy_2001,
	title = {Porohy sul {Dniepr}. {Radici} lesniewskiane della semantica tarskiana},
	booktitle = {Prospettive della logica e della filosofia della scienza},
	publisher = {Rubbettino},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Fano, V. and Tarozzi, G. and Stanzione, M.},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {98--118}
}

@incollection{betti_donne_2000,
	address = {Genova},
	title = {Le donne nella filosofia analitica austriaca},
	booktitle = {Donne e {Filosofia}},
	publisher = {Erga},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Marsonet, M.},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {98--118}
}

@incollection{betti_porohy_1999,
	title = {The {Porohy} on {Dnepr}},
	booktitle = {The {Logica} {Yearbook} 1998},
	publisher = {Filosofia},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Childers, Timothy},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {99--109}
}

@article{betti_o_1998,
	title = {O prawdzie odwiecznej. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Leśniewski} ({On} {Sempiternal} {Truth}. {Bolzano}-{Twardowski}-{Leśniewski} - in {Polish})},
	volume = {22},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Filozofia Nauki VI},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {51--75}
}

@incollection{betti_veritate:_1998,
	address = {Dordrecht},
	title = {De {Veritate}: {Another} {Chapter}. {The} {Bolzano}-{Leśniewski} {Connection}},
	abstract = {115-137},
	booktitle = {The {Lvov}-{Warsaw} {School} and {Contemporary} {Philosophy}},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers (Synthese series)},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Woleński, K. Kijania-Placek \& J.},
	year = {1998}
}

115-137

@article{betti_il_1998,
	title = {Il {Rasoio} di {Leśniewski}},
	volume = {LXXIX},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Rivista di filosofia},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {89--117}
}

@incollection{betti_semantics_nodate,
	address = {Oxford},
	title = {Semantics and {Axiomatics} from {Bolzano} to {Tarski} [commissioned for the online version]},
	booktitle = {The {Oxford} {Handbook} of {The} {History} of {Analytic} {Philosophy} [online version only, not for the printed version]},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	editor = {Beaney, Michael}
}

@book{betti_making_nodate,
	title = {Making {True} - {On} the {History} of {Facts} and the {Correspondence} {Theory} of {Truth} from {Aristotle} to {Armstrong} [draft, ms.] [in preparation]},
	author = {Betti, Arianna},
	keywords = {Bolzano}
}

@unpublished{betti_wissenschaftslehre_nodate,
	title = {Wissenschaftslehre {Wiki} {Project} [in preparation]},
	author = {Betti, Arianna and Blok, Johan and Huijgen, Paul and Loeb, Iris and Roski, Stefan and Sikkel, Constantijn and Koleva, Mariya and van den Berg, Hein},
	keywords = {Bolzano}
}