@incollection{costantini_regulating_2022,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Regulating endorobots in the {European} {Union}: {An} overview of the ethical and legal framework},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-0-12-821750-4},
	booktitle = {Endorobotics. {Design}, {R}\&{D} and {Future} {Trends}},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Balducci Romano, Fabio},
	editor = {Manfredi, Luigi},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {297--317},
}

@article{costantini_artificial_2022,
	title = {Artificial {Intelligence} and {Design}: {The} {Case} of “{Request} to {Intervene}” in “{Industry} 4.0”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	doi = {DOI: 10.38023/8af1d00d-a216-4422-a},
	number = {24/2/2022},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Genna, Lorenzo and Parisi, Giuseppe},
	year = {2022},
}

@incollection{costantini_healthcare_2022,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	title = {Healthcare data governance in the {EU}: {Main} challenges in personal data protection},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-0-12-821750-4},
	booktitle = {Endorobotics. {Design}, {R}\&{D} and {Future} {Trends}},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Soncini, Giada},
	editor = {Manfredi, Luigi},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {319--336},
}

@incollection{galvan_qualita_2022,
	address = {Roma},
	series = {Informatica {Giuridica}},
	title = {La “{Qualità} dell’{Informazione}” nella {IoT} forensics: dal modello {IQA} all’ontologia forense},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {9791259946430},
	language = {italian},
	number = {8},
	booktitle = {Nuove questioni di informatica forense},
	publisher = {Aracne},
	author = {Galvan, Fausto and Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise and Battiato, Sebastiano},
	editor = {Raffaella Brighi, Cesare Maioli},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {159--186},
}

@incollection{costantini_artificial_2022-1,
	title = {Artificial {Intelligence} and {Design}: {The} {Case} of “{Request} to {Intervene}” in “{Industry} 4.0”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {24/2/2022},
	booktitle = {Conferenza iris},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Genna, Lorenzo and Parisi, Giuseppe},
	year = {2022},
}

@incollection{costantini_medical_2021,
	address = {Bern},
	series = {Colloquium},
	title = {Medical {Research} {Data} {Governance} in the {Eu}. {Lessons} {Learned} from the {Case} of {Unityfvg}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-96966-452-0},
	number = {30},
	booktitle = {Cybergovernance. {Tagungsband} des 24. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} {IRIS} 2020},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Crisci, Francesco and Soncini, Giada},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Erich and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti and Eder, Stefan and Hanke, Philip},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {319--327},
}

@article{costantini_intelligenza_2021,
	title = {Intelligenza artificiale, design tecnologico e futuro del lavoro nell’{UE}: i presupposti e il contesto},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {8-9},
	journal = {Il lavoro nella giurisprudenza},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {807--816},
}

@incollection{costantini_giustizia_2021,
	address = {Milano},
	title = {Giustizia elettronica e digitalizzazione giudiziale: contesto europeo ed esperienza italiana},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-88-13-37613-0 88-13-37613-8},
	language = {Italian},
	number = {Comp.Lex - Diritto, computazione, complessità},
	booktitle = {Diritto e tecnologie informatiche. {Questioni} di informatica giuridica, prospettive istituzionali e sfide sociali},
	publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Casadei, Thomas and Pietropaoli, Stefano},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {105--117},
}

@article{costantini_intelligenza_2021-1,
	title = {Intelligenza artificiale, design tecnologico e futuro del lavoro nell’{UE}: il caso dei platform workers},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {12},
	journal = {Il lavoro nella giurisprudenza},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {1124--1135},
}

@incollection{costantini_lesperienza_2021,
	address = {Napoli},
	title = {L’esperienza giuridica nella società dell’informazione contemporanea: il problema delle “norme sperimentali”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {Teoria e prassi dell’esperienza giuridica. {In} ricordo di {Francesco} {Gentile}},
	publisher = {Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Scerbo, Alberto},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {165--184},
}

@article{costantini_assessing_2021,
	title = {Assessing “{Information} {Quality}” in {IoT} {Forensics}: {Theoretical} {Framework} and {Model} {Implementation}},
	volume = {8},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {9},
	journal = {Journal of Applied Logics — IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Galvan, Fausto and De Stefani, Marco Alvise and Battiato, Sebastiano},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {2373--2406},
}

@article{costantini_medical_2021-1,
	title = {Medical {Research} {Data} {Governance} in the {Eu}. {Lessons} {Learned} from the {Case} of {Unityfvg}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	doi = {10.38023/dea26655-c3e2-4a53-a8cb-d2b50a97726e},
	number = {25 Februar 2021},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico Crisci},
	year = {2021},
}

@article{costantini_code_2021,
	title = {“{Code} {Is} {Law}” {And} {Smart} {Contracts}. {Embedding} {Ethics} {In} {Decentralized} {Ledger} {Systems}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	doi = {DOI: 10.38023/c4b873df-aee5-4de3-893b-a15be9df5128},
	abstract = {“Smart Contracts” are tools based on distributed ledger technologies deployed in order to
increase the effi ciency of transactions. Their adoption is growing at an exponential scale due
to the undisputable advantages brought by their property of self-executing tasks, yet on the
opposite it raises concerns since it does not require any sort of moral scrutiny. In our paper
we fi rst address how the current ethical discussion can be framed in Decentralized Ledger
Technologies, then we unfold the evolution in legal theory of a decentralized approach – epitomized
by the motto “code is law” – fi nally we focus on “smart contracts” discussing the
application of “engineering ethics” or the implementation of “ethical oracles”. At the end we
conclude with a few remarks and some perspectives for future research.},
	number = {27 May 2021},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico Ferencz},
	year = {2021},
}

“Smart Contracts” are tools based on distributed ledger technologies deployed in order to increase the effi ciency of transactions. Their adoption is growing at an exponential scale due to the undisputable advantages brought by their property of self-executing tasks, yet on the opposite it raises concerns since it does not require any sort of moral scrutiny. In our paper we fi rst address how the current ethical discussion can be framed in Decentralized Ledger Technologies, then we unfold the evolution in legal theory of a decentralized approach – epitomized by the motto “code is law” – fi nally we focus on “smart contracts” discussing the application of “engineering ethics” or the implementation of “ethical oracles”. At the end we conclude with a few remarks and some perspectives for future research.

@incollection{costantini_code_2021-1,
	address = {Bern (CH)},
	title = {“{Code} {Is} {Law}” {And} {Smart} {Contracts}. {Embedding} {Ethics} {In} {Decentralized} {Ledger} {Systems}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-96966-452-0},
	abstract = {“Smart Contracts” are tools based on distributed ledger technologies deployed in order to increase the efficiency of transactions. Their adoption is growing at an exponential scale due to the undisputable advantages brought by their property of self-executing tasks, yet on the opposite it raises concerns since it does not require any sort of moral scrutiny. In our paper we first address how the current ethical discussion can be framed in Decentralized Ledger Technologies, then we unfold the evolution in legal theory of a decentralized approach – epit- omized by the motto “code is law” – finally we focus on “smart contracts” discussing the application of “engineering ethics” or the implementation of “ethical oracles”. At the end we conclude with a few remarks and some perspectives for future research.},
	number = {30},
	booktitle = {Cybergovernance : {Tagungsband} des 24. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} = {Cybergovernance}: proceedings of the 24th {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} ({IRIS} 2021)},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Costantini, Federico Ferencz},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Erich and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti and Eder, Stefan and Hanke, Philip},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {85--91},
}

“Smart Contracts” are tools based on distributed ledger technologies deployed in order to increase the efficiency of transactions. Their adoption is growing at an exponential scale due to the undisputable advantages brought by their property of self-executing tasks, yet on the opposite it raises concerns since it does not require any sort of moral scrutiny. In our paper we first address how the current ethical discussion can be framed in Decentralized Ledger Technologies, then we unfold the evolution in legal theory of a decentralized approach – epit- omized by the motto “code is law” – finally we focus on “smart contracts” discussing the application of “engineering ethics” or the implementation of “ethical oracles”. At the end we conclude with a few remarks and some perspectives for future research.

@article{galvan_forensic_2021,
	title = {Forensic {Data} {Governance} in {Eu}: a {Certification} {Framework} for {IoT} {Devices}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	doi = {10.38023/720cc7aa-b70b-4cfc-b3d6-f67bec4cc767},
	number = {25. Februar 2021},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Galvan, Fausto Costantini},
	year = {2021},
}

@incollection{galvan_forensic_2021-1,
	address = {Bern},
	series = {Colloquium},
	title = {Forensic {Data} {Governance} in {Eu}: a {Certification} {Framework} for {IoT} {Devices}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-96966-452-0},
	number = {30},
	booktitle = {Cybergovernance : {Tagungsband} des 24. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} = {Cybergovernance}: proceedings of the 24th {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} ({IRIS} 2021)},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Galvan, Fausto Costantini},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Erich and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti and Eder, Stefan and Hanke, Philip},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {329--336},
}

@article{costantini_participative_2020,
	title = {Participative {Decision}-{Making} and {Gamification}: {The} {Case} of «{Civic} {Points}»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {28 Februar 2020},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Coppola, Paolo and Franco, Gabriele},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {113--120},
}

@incollection{costantini_autonomous_2020,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	series = {Advances in {Transport} {Policy} and {Planning}},
	title = {Autonomous vehicles in a {GDPR} era: {An} international comparison},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-0-12-820191-6},
	abstract = {Due to the extensive amount of data generated by an autonomous vehicle (AV) and the information flowing among AVs and through surrounding infrastructure, data governance legislation poses as a significant challenge especially in the perspective of their large-scale introduction. Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which is known as GDPR and entered into force in May 2018, has been a tipping point in personal data protection even in countries outside the European Union (EU). Although the majority of EU member States have already adapted their legal systems to its provisions, a few others are still on the process, and institutions and companies are challenged by the need to comply. This chapter conducts a mapping review of existing regulations in seven countries, namely Austria, Brazil, Greece, Italy, New Zealand, Slovakia and Switzerland, to assess policy challenges of AV testing and deployment focusing on the implications in terms of data protection. Potential areas of cooperation are identified, as well as evidence of divergent approaches, which are discussed in order to provide valuable suggestions for policy making at local, European and international level for AV testing and deployment.},
	number = {5},
	booktitle = {Policy {Implications} of {Autonomous} {Vehicles}},
	publisher = {Elsevier Academic Press},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Thomopoulos, Nikolas and Steibel, Fabro and Curl, Angela and Lugano, Giuseppe and Kováčiková, Tatiana},
	editor = {Milakis, Dimitris and Thomopoulos, Nikolas and van Wee, Bert},
	month = apr,
	year = {2020},
	keywords = {AVs trials, Data protection, GDPR, International comparison, Living labs, Regulatory sandboxes},
	pages = {191--213},
}

Due to the extensive amount of data generated by an autonomous vehicle (AV) and the information flowing among AVs and through surrounding infrastructure, data governance legislation poses as a significant challenge especially in the perspective of their large-scale introduction. Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which is known as GDPR and entered into force in May 2018, has been a tipping point in personal data protection even in countries outside the European Union (EU). Although the majority of EU member States have already adapted their legal systems to its provisions, a few others are still on the process, and institutions and companies are challenged by the need to comply. This chapter conducts a mapping review of existing regulations in seven countries, namely Austria, Brazil, Greece, Italy, New Zealand, Slovakia and Switzerland, to assess policy challenges of AV testing and deployment focusing on the implications in terms of data protection. Potential areas of cooperation are identified, as well as evidence of divergent approaches, which are discussed in order to provide valuable suggestions for policy making at local, European and international level for AV testing and deployment.

@incollection{costantini_inaction_2020,
	address = {Milano},
	title = {“{Inaction} is not an option”. {Intelligenza} artificiale, diritto e società nella prospettiva dell’{Unione} {Europea}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-88-6400-097-8 971280119063},
	booktitle = {Diritto e futuro dell’{Europa}. {Contributi} per gli workshop del {XXXI} {Congresso} della {Società} {Italiana} di {Filosofia} del {Diritto} ({Bergamo}, 13-15 settembre 2018)},
	publisher = {Edizioni l’Ornitorinco},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Tincani, Persio},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {302--309},
}

@incollection{costantini_participative_2020-1,
	address = {Berna},
	series = {Colloquium},
	title = {Participative {Decision}-{Making} and {Gamification}: {The} {Case} of «{Civic} {Points}»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-96698-589-5},
	number = {II.28},
	booktitle = {Verantwortungsbewusste {Digitalisierung} / {Responsible} {Digitalization}. {Tagungsband} des 23. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} {IRIS} 2020 / {Proceedings} of the 23rd {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} {IRIS} 2020},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Coppola, Paolo and Franco, Gabriele},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Eric and Hötzendorfer, Walter and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {113--120},
}

@incollection{dogan_ethical_2020,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	series = {Advances in {Transport} {Policy} and {Planning}},
	title = {Ethical issues concerning automated vehicles and their implications for transport},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {The introduction of automated vehicles (AV) in the market progresses before the stakeholders fully understand the capacity and the limitations of this complex technology. While this can be considered as a usual course of deployment of a new technology, future large-scale expansion of AV at the societal level makes public acceptance a key issue. One of the main aspects of public acceptance is the ethical concerns raised by AV. In the current chapter, we will mainly review the research on the ethical issues related to ethics-by-design of AV through its moral agency, application of different ethical theories to the decision making in critical situations, and whether ethics setting should be mandatory or personal. Our review shows that while there are several ethical frameworks proposed for AV, research on public acceptance mostly contrasts utilitarian and deontological ethics. Algorithmic implementation of the proposed frameworks, however, is yet to be done. In the second part, we will address several ethical issues relevant for the implementation of AV in transport system and policy decision making.},
	number = {5},
	booktitle = {Policy {Implications} of {Autonomous} {Vehicles}},
	publisher = {Elsevier Academic Press},
	author = {Dogan, Ebru and Costantini, Federico and Le Boennec, Rémy},
	editor = {Milakis, Dimitris and Thomopoulos, Nikolas and van Wee, Bert},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {215--233},
}

The introduction of automated vehicles (AV) in the market progresses before the stakeholders fully understand the capacity and the limitations of this complex technology. While this can be considered as a usual course of deployment of a new technology, future large-scale expansion of AV at the societal level makes public acceptance a key issue. One of the main aspects of public acceptance is the ethical concerns raised by AV. In the current chapter, we will mainly review the research on the ethical issues related to ethics-by-design of AV through its moral agency, application of different ethical theories to the decision making in critical situations, and whether ethics setting should be mandatory or personal. Our review shows that while there are several ethical frameworks proposed for AV, research on public acceptance mostly contrasts utilitarian and deontological ethics. Algorithmic implementation of the proposed frameworks, however, is yet to be done. In the second part, we will address several ethical issues relevant for the implementation of AV in transport system and policy decision making.

@incollection{galvan_case_2020,
	address = {Bern},
	series = {Colloquium},
	title = {A {Case} {Study} for an “{Accountable}” {IoT} {Forensics}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-96698-589-5},
	number = {II.28},
	booktitle = {Verantwortungsbewusste {Digitalisierung} / {Responsible} {Digitalization}. {Tagungsband} des 23. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} {IRIS} 2020 / {Proceedings} of the 23rd {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} {IRIS} 2020},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Galvan, Fausto and Costantini, Federico and Battiato, Sebastiano},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Eric and Hötzendorfer, Walter and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {533--542},
}

@incollection{costantini_digital_2019,
	address = {Newcastle-upon-Tyne},
	series = {{ADAPT} {Labour} {Studies}},
	title = {The {Digital} {Use} of {Human} {Beings}: {Labour} in the “{Information} {Age}”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-1-5275-3786-6 1-5275-3786-2},
	abstract = {It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.},
	language = {English},
	number = {15},
	booktitle = {Legal {Issues} in the {Digital} {Economy}. {The} {Impact} of {Disruptive} {Technologies} in the {Labour} {Market}},
	publisher = {Cambridge Scholars Publisher},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Filì, Valeria and Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {1--22},
}

It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.

@article{costantini_profilazione_2019,
	title = {Profilazione e “{Automated} {Decision} {Making}” in ambito lavorativo nella giurisprudenza italiana},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {11},
	journal = {Il lavoro nella giurisprudenza},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {984--997},
}

@incollection{costantini_iot_2019,
	address = {Salzburg},
	title = {{IoT}, {Intelligent} {Transport} {Systems} and {MaaS} ({Mobility} as a {Service})},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {IoT (Internet of Things) applications are crucial in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS). MaaS (Mobility as a Service) is an advanced model of ITS in which public institutions, private operators and citizens are deeply connected since means of transport are virtualized in mobility resources and provided to users through the Internet. This contribution, after a short introduction, addresses legal concerns focusing on three aspects: (1) security of technological platforms and infrastructures, (2) protection of user’s personal data, (3) communication among devices and in the IoT ecosystem.},
	number = {II. 26},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 22nd {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} {IRIS} 2019},
	publisher = {Weblaw},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Archetti, Eleonora and Di Ciommo, Floridea and Ferencz, Balint},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Eric and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {245--254},
}

IoT (Internet of Things) applications are crucial in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS). MaaS (Mobility as a Service) is an advanced model of ITS in which public institutions, private operators and citizens are deeply connected since means of transport are virtualized in mobility resources and provided to users through the Internet. This contribution, after a short introduction, addresses legal concerns focusing on three aspects: (1) security of technological platforms and infrastructures, (2) protection of user’s personal data, (3) communication among devices and in the IoT ecosystem.

@article{costantini_iot_2019-1,
	title = {{IoT}, {Intelligent} {Transport} {Systems} and {MaaS} ({Mobility} as a {Service})},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {IoT (Internet of Things) applications are crucial in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS). MaaS (Mobility as a Service) is an advanced model of ITS in which public institutions, private operators and citizens are deeply connected since means of transport are virtualized in mobility resources and provided to users through the Internet. This contribution, after a short introduction, addresses legal concerns focusing on three aspects: (1) security of technological platforms and infrastructures, (2) protection of user’s personal data, (3) communication among devices and in the IoT ecosystem.},
	number = {21 February 2019},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Archetti, Eleonora and Di Ciommo, Floridea and Ferencz, Balint},
	year = {2019},
}

IoT (Internet of Things) applications are crucial in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS). MaaS (Mobility as a Service) is an advanced model of ITS in which public institutions, private operators and citizens are deeply connected since means of transport are virtualized in mobility resources and provided to users through the Internet. This contribution, after a short introduction, addresses legal concerns focusing on three aspects: (1) security of technological platforms and infrastructures, (2) protection of user’s personal data, (3) communication among devices and in the IoT ecosystem.

@book{fili_legal_2019,
	address = {Newcastle-upon-Tyne},
	series = {{ADAPT} {Labour} {Studies}},
	title = {Legal {Issues} in the {Digital} {Economy}. {The} {Impact} of {Disruptive} {Technologies} in the {Labour} {Market}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-1-5275-3786-6 1-5275-3786-2},
	abstract = {It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.},
	language = {English},
	number = {15},
	publisher = {Cambridge Scholars Publisher},
	author = {Filì, Valeria and Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2019},
}

It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.

@article{costantini_quality_2019,
	title = {The «{Quality} of {Information}» {Challenges} in {IoT} {Forensics}: {An} {Introduction}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {IoT technologies pose serious challenges to digital forensics. The acquisition of digital evidence is hindered by the number and extreme variety of IoT items, often lacking of physical interfaces, connected in unprotected networks, feeding data to uncontrolled cloud services. In this paper we introduce the main issues of «information quality» in this field. After a short introduction, we provide an overview on digital forensics approach to preserve the «chain of custody», then we detect relevant IoT features in order to analyse main concerns in digital forensics. At the end, we propose a formula for benchmarking forensics trustworthiness (Information Quality Assessment).},
	number = {21 February 2019},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise and Galvan, Fausto},
	year = {2019},
}

IoT technologies pose serious challenges to digital forensics. The acquisition of digital evidence is hindered by the number and extreme variety of IoT items, often lacking of physical interfaces, connected in unprotected networks, feeding data to uncontrolled cloud services. In this paper we introduce the main issues of «information quality» in this field. After a short introduction, we provide an overview on digital forensics approach to preserve the «chain of custody», then we detect relevant IoT features in order to analyse main concerns in digital forensics. At the end, we propose a formula for benchmarking forensics trustworthiness (Information Quality Assessment).

@article{costantini_decisione_2019,
	title = {Decisione automatizzata, dati personali e pubblica amministrazione in {Europa}: verso un “{Social} credit system”?},
	volume = {XL},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Istituzioni del Federalismo},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Franco, Gabriele},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {715--738},
}

@incollection{fili_introduction_2019,
	address = {Newcastle-upon-Tyne},
	series = {{ADAPT} {Labour} {Studies}},
	title = {Introduction},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-1-5275-3786-6 1-5275-3786-2},
	abstract = {It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.},
	language = {English},
	number = {15},
	booktitle = {Legal {Issues} in the {Digital} {Economy}. {The} {Impact} of {Disruptive} {Technologies} in the {Labour} {Market}},
	publisher = {Cambridge Scholars Publisher},
	author = {Filì, Valeria and Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Filì, Valeria and Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2019},
}

It is a matter of fact that technological innovation is deeply impacting on our culture, society, economy and labour market. The massive and widespread use of Artificial Intelligence and the strengthening of the collaborative economy (also known as 'gig' or 'platform' economy) are blurring the traditional legal categories and creating new requirements for protection for employed and self-employed workers. This book represents a tool to understand where we are and where we are going, focusing on old and new legal categories and labour market policies. The chapters included in this volume cover.

@article{hogan_can_2019,
	title = {Can a {Blockchain}-{Based} {Maas} {Create} {Business} {Value}?},
	volume = {1},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	issn = {2504-3900},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019028001},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Decentralized 2019},
	author = {Hogan, Gabriel and Dolins, Sigma and Senturk, Izzet Fatih and Fyrogenis, Ioannis and Fu, Qian and Murati, Erion and Costantini, Federico and Thomopoulos, Nikolas},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{costantini_il_2018,
	title = {Il {Regolamento} ({UE}) 679/2016 sulla protezione dei dati personali},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {6},
	journal = {Il lavoro nella giurisprudenza},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {545--555},
}

@incollection{costantini_societa_2018,
	address = {Lecce},
	title = {Società dell’{Informazione} e “diritto tecnologico”. {Il} caso delle norme “sperimentali”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-88-6760-581-1},
	booktitle = {Limiti del diritto. {Prospettive} di riflessione e analisi},
	publisher = {Pensa Multimedia},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {De Giorgi, Raffaele},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {617--629},
}

@article{costantini_data_2018,
	title = {Data {Protection}, {Digital} {Forensics} and {Encryption} in {Mobile} {Devices} in {European} {Union}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise},
	year = {2018},
}

@incollection{costantini_data_2018-1,
	address = {Bern (CH)},
	title = {Data {Protection}, {Digital} {Forensics} and {Encryption} in {Mobile} {Devices} in {European} {Union}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {Datenschutz / {LegalTech} - {Tagungsband} des 21. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposions} {IRIS} 2018: {Data} {Protection} / {LegalTech} - {Proceedings} of the 21st {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium} ({Colloquium})},
	publisher = {Editions Weblaw / Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Erich and Kummer, Franz and Saarenpää, Ahti and Schafer, Burkhard},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {537--547},
}

@incollection{costantini_intelligenza_2017,
	address = {Roma},
	title = {Intelligenza artificiale diritto civile. {Verso} una “artificial intelligence forensics”?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {{IISFA} {Memberbook} 2017 {DIGITAL} {FORENSICS}: {Condivisione} della conoscenza tra i membri dell'{IISFA} {ITALIAN} {CHAPTER}},
	publisher = {IISFA},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Costabile, Gerardo and Attanasio, Antonino and Ianulardo, Mario},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {13--35},
}

@article{costantini_collecting_2017,
	title = {Collecting evidence in the «{Information} {Society}»: theoretical background, current issues and future perspectives in «{Cloud} {Forensics}»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {The increased adoption of «cloud computing» – allowing a partial or complete «virtualization» of computing resources – requires a particular method of investigative analysis of data, called «cloud forensics». In this paper we tackle technical and legal issues concerning its theoretical and practical aspects. After a short explanation of «Philosophy of Information» – taken as theoretical model – we introduce the issues pertaining «digital forensics» and then we propose some criteria in order to assess a cloud acquisition. In conclusion we provide an example and offer our final remarks.},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise},
	month = feb,
	year = {2017},
}

The increased adoption of «cloud computing» – allowing a partial or complete «virtualization» of computing resources – requires a particular method of investigative analysis of data, called «cloud forensics». In this paper we tackle technical and legal issues concerning its theoretical and practical aspects. After a short explanation of «Philosophy of Information» – taken as theoretical model – we introduce the issues pertaining «digital forensics» and then we propose some criteria in order to assess a cloud acquisition. In conclusion we provide an example and offer our final remarks.

@incollection{costantini_collecting_2017-1,
	address = {Wien},
	title = {Collecting evidence in the «{Information} {Society}»: theoretical background, current issues and future perspectives in «{Cloud} {Forensics}»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {The increased adoption of «cloud computing» – allowing a partial or complete «virtualization» of computing resources – requires a particular method of investigative analysis of data, called «cloud forensics». In this paper we tackle technical and legal issues concerning its theoretical and practical aspects. After a short explanation of «Philosophy of Information» – taken as theoretical model – we introduce the issues pertaining «digital forensics» and then we propose some criteria in order to assess a cloud acquisition. In conclusion we provide an example and offer our final remarks.},
	number = {326},
	booktitle = {Trends un {Communities} des {Rechtinformatik}. {Tagungsband} des 20. {Internationalen} {Rechstinformatik} {Symposion} / {Trends} and {Communities} if {Legal} {Informatics}. {Proceedings} of the 20th {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium}},
	publisher = {Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Eric and Kummer, Franz and Hötzendorfer, Walter and Sorge, Christoph},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {461--468},
}

The increased adoption of «cloud computing» – allowing a partial or complete «virtualization» of computing resources – requires a particular method of investigative analysis of data, called «cloud forensics». In this paper we tackle technical and legal issues concerning its theoretical and practical aspects. After a short explanation of «Philosophy of Information» – taken as theoretical model – we introduce the issues pertaining «digital forensics» and then we propose some criteria in order to assess a cloud acquisition. In conclusion we provide an example and offer our final remarks.

@incollection{costantini_proposal_2016,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	series = {Frontiers in {Artificial} {Intelligence} and {Applications}},
	title = {Proposal for a {Theoretical} {Framework} in {Digital} {Forensics}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-1-61499-725-2 978-1-61499-726-9},
	abstract = {This short paper aims to introduce a theoretical framework in digital forensics based on “Philosophy of Information”. After a preliminary clarification of its key concepts, some general issues concerning “Information Quality” are
outlined in digital and cloud forensics. At the end, I offer a few remarks on future researches’ perspectives.},
	number = {294},
	booktitle = {{JURIX} 2016. {Proceedings} of the {Twenty}-ninth {Annual} {Conference} on {Legal} {Knowledge} and {Information} {Systems}},
	publisher = {IOS Press},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Bex, Floris and Villata, Serena},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {179--182},
}

This short paper aims to introduce a theoretical framework in digital forensics based on “Philosophy of Information”. After a preliminary clarification of its key concepts, some general issues concerning “Information Quality” are outlined in digital and cloud forensics. At the end, I offer a few remarks on future researches’ perspectives.

@inproceedings{costantini_network_2016,
	address = {Wien},
	title = {Network {Analysis} and «{Predictive} {Policing}»: {Towards} a «{Profiling} {Society}»?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-903035-09-6},
	abstract = {Network analysis is a powerful tool that is increasingly used not only to determine events that occurred in the past, but also to predict what may happen in the future. This paper will discuss the perspective, far from being abstract or remote, that such methods may be adopted in order to anticipate crimes. Taking into account current technologies, present legal science and according to the recent «Onlife Manifesto», here are talked three issues, concerning respectively the epistemological, the legal-philosophical and the anthropological aspect. In the first place, the relevance of the information provided in a crime’s «prediction», since it does not concern an event of the past. Secondly, the nature of responsibility ascribed on these grounds, as neither an «actus reo» nor a «mens rea» can be found in the case. Finally, the kind of punishment could be given to the supposed criminal, because free will should be doubted if his behaviour could be foreseen.},
	booktitle = {Netwerke. {Tagungsband} des 19. {Internationalen} {Rechstinformatik} {Symposion} / {Networks}. {Proceedings} of the 19th {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium}},
	publisher = {Weblaw / Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Eric and Kummer, Franz and Hötzendorfer, Walter and Borges, George},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {93--100},
}

Network analysis is a powerful tool that is increasingly used not only to determine events that occurred in the past, but also to predict what may happen in the future. This paper will discuss the perspective, far from being abstract or remote, that such methods may be adopted in order to anticipate crimes. Taking into account current technologies, present legal science and according to the recent «Onlife Manifesto», here are talked three issues, concerning respectively the epistemological, the legal-philosophical and the anthropological aspect. In the first place, the relevance of the information provided in a crime’s «prediction», since it does not concern an event of the past. Secondly, the nature of responsibility ascribed on these grounds, as neither an «actus reo» nor a «mens rea» can be found in the case. Finally, the kind of punishment could be given to the supposed criminal, because free will should be doubted if his behaviour could be foreseen.

@article{costantini_network_2016-1,
	title = {Network {Analysis} and «{Predictive} {Policing}»: {Towards} a «{Profiling} {Society}»?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	issn = {978-3-903035-09-6},
	abstract = {Network analysis is a powerful tool that is increasingly used not only to determine events that occurred in the past, but also to predict what may happen in the future. This paper will discuss the perspective, far from being abstract or remote, that such methods may be adopted in order to anticipate crimes. Taking into account current technologies, present legal science and according to the recent «Onlife Manifesto», here are talked three issues, concerning respectively the epistemological, the legal-philosophical and the anthropological aspect. In the first place, the relevance of the information provided in a crime’s «prediction», since it does not concern an event of the past. Secondly, the nature of responsibility ascribed on these grounds, as neither an «actus reo» nor a «mens rea» can be found in the case. Finally, the kind of punishment could be given to the supposed criminal, because free will should be doubted if his behaviour could be foreseen.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	month = feb,
	year = {2016},
}

Network analysis is a powerful tool that is increasingly used not only to determine events that occurred in the past, but also to predict what may happen in the future. This paper will discuss the perspective, far from being abstract or remote, that such methods may be adopted in order to anticipate crimes. Taking into account current technologies, present legal science and according to the recent «Onlife Manifesto», here are talked three issues, concerning respectively the epistemological, the legal-philosophical and the anthropological aspect. In the first place, the relevance of the information provided in a crime’s «prediction», since it does not concern an event of the past. Secondly, the nature of responsibility ascribed on these grounds, as neither an «actus reo» nor a «mens rea» can be found in the case. Finally, the kind of punishment could be given to the supposed criminal, because free will should be doubted if his behaviour could be foreseen.

@article{costantini_il_2016,
	title = {Il problema della sicurezza tra informatica e diritto: una prospettiva emergente dalle "{Smart} {Cars}"},
	volume = {XXV},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Informatica e Diritto},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Montessoro, Pier Luca},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {95--114},
}

@incollection{costantini_questioni_2015,
	address = {Roma},
	series = {Informatica {Giuridica}},
	title = {Questioni teoretiche concernenti la prospettiva delle "folksonomie legali"},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-88-548-9016-9},
	number = {2},
	booktitle = {Filosofia del diritto e nuove tecnologie. {Prospettive} di ricerca tra teoria e pratica},
	publisher = {Aracne Editrice},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Brighi, Raffaella and Zullo, Silvia and Palmirani, Monica and Sartor, Giovanni},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {401--415},
}

@article{costantini_folksonomies_2015,
	title = {\#{Folksonomies} and \#{Law}. {Theoretical} issues on «search for meaning» and legal ontologies},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	month = sep,
	year = {2015},
}

@incollection{costantini_peer--peer_2015,
	series = {Lecture {Notes} in {Computer} {Science}},
	title = {The “{Peer}-to-{Peer}” {Economy} and {Social} {Ontology}: {Legal} {Issues} and {Theoretical} {Perspectives}},
	volume = {9341},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-3-319-25638-2},
	language = {English},
	number = {9341},
	booktitle = {The {Semantic} {Web}: {ESWC} 2015 {Satellite} {Events}},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Gandon, Fabien and Guéret, Christophe and Villata, Serena and Breslin, John and Faron-Zucker, Catherine and Zimmermann, Antoine},
	month = jan,
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {Collaborative consumption, Legal issues, Peer-to-peer economy, Philosophy of law, Social ontology},
	pages = {311--322},
}

@article{costantini_il_2015,
	title = {Il “controllo” della prova digitale. {Questioni} teoretiche, organizzative e operative},
	volume = {XXIV},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {Il “controllo” della prova digitale. Questioni teoretiche, organizzative e operative},
	number = {1-2},
	journal = {Informatica e Diritto},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and De Stefani, Marco Alvise},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {105--119},
}

Il “controllo” della prova digitale. Questioni teoretiche, organizzative e operative

@incollection{costantini_folksonomies_2014,
	address = {Salzburg},
	title = {\#{Folksonomies}: the next step forward to transparency?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {In this paper, I offer a theoretical perspective on the application of collective tagging system to the field of legal information management. I discuss the hypothesis that folksonomies could be a useful tool to increase the transparency of the legal system. The essay can be divided in three main parts. In the first section, I introduce the issue of transparency in the context of the legal system through an overview of different opinions outlined by contemporary legal philosophy, thereby confirming the overall formalistic perspective. In the second part, I show how transparency may correspond to the concept of “data sharing” that is achieved in the «many to many» communication through the Internet. In the third, part I analyse the collective tagging system after identifying the key element of Web 2.0 in the sharing of metadata, providing the definition of folksonomies and describing some features of its possible application to legal information management. In conclusion, I suggest that folksonomies could improve legal information management through Internet.},
	language = {English},
	booktitle = {Tagunsgband des 17. {Internationalen} {Rechtsinformatik} {Symposion} / {Proceedings} of the 17th {International} {Legal} {Informatics} {Symposium}},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Schweighofer, Erich and Kummer, Franz and Hötzendorfer, Walter},
	month = feb,
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {Folksonomies, Legal informatics, Philosophy of law, Transparency},
}

In this paper, I offer a theoretical perspective on the application of collective tagging system to the field of legal information management. I discuss the hypothesis that folksonomies could be a useful tool to increase the transparency of the legal system. The essay can be divided in three main parts. In the first section, I introduce the issue of transparency in the context of the legal system through an overview of different opinions outlined by contemporary legal philosophy, thereby confirming the overall formalistic perspective. In the second part, I show how transparency may correspond to the concept of “data sharing” that is achieved in the «many to many» communication through the Internet. In the third, part I analyse the collective tagging system after identifying the key element of Web 2.0 in the sharing of metadata, providing the definition of folksonomies and describing some features of its possible application to legal information management. In conclusion, I suggest that folksonomies could improve legal information management through Internet.

@misc{costantini_folksonomies_2014-1,
	title = {Folksonomies \& {Law} - {Background} issues and theoretical perspectives},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	journal = {VoxPopuLII. New voices in legal information},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2014},
}

@book{costantini_lontologia_2014,
	address = {Napoli},
	title = {L’«ontologia sociale» di {Giovanni} {Ambrosetti}. {Una} visione del diritto naturale classico tra “verità” e “prassi”},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {Il lavoro affronta il tema della socialità nel pensiero di Giovanni Ambrosetti (Verona 1915 - Carpi 1985) il quale, adottando un realismo “critico” di matrice neoscolastica, intese superare il positivismo – nelle due versioni empiristica e razionalistica – e contrapporsi alle posizioni di stampo naturalistico ravvisate nello storicismo assoluto e nell’idealismo. L’“ontologia sociale” dell’Autore, composta di “permanenze” o “verità sociali” – le principali sono la famiglia, la proprietà e lo Stato – si esplica in una fenomenologia – definita “diritto naturale cristiano” – nella quale la Filosofia del diritto si coniuga con la Filosofia della storia ed in cui costume, diritto e morale sono riuniti in una visione complessiva che si propone di stabilire una connessione tra ordine naturale, ordine sociale ed ordine interiore all’insegna di una visione sostanziale della giustizia ed in funzione della perfezione spirituale della persona. Lo studio si propone di inquadrare l’argomento nella discussione sul rapporto tra “verità” e “prassi” presente nella filosofia del diritto italiana del Novecento. Il lavoro intende anzitutto verificare in che termini il tentativo di sintesi tra “metafisica classica” e “filosofia dei valori” si inserisca nel diritto naturale classico e costituisca un’alternativa rispetto al giusnaturalismo moderno; in secondo luogo approfondisce i profili critici di tale prospettiva – il rapporto tra essenza ed esistenza, tra ordine e sistema, tra teologia, filosofia e scienza, tra fondamento e fonte dell’ordinamento giuridico, tra costume, morale e diritto – i quali consentono, per un verso, di affermare la straordinaria attualità della figura di Ambrosetti e, per altro verso, di individuare ulteriori percorsi di ricerca.},
	publisher = {Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2014},
}

Il lavoro affronta il tema della socialità nel pensiero di Giovanni Ambrosetti (Verona 1915 - Carpi 1985) il quale, adottando un realismo “critico” di matrice neoscolastica, intese superare il positivismo – nelle due versioni empiristica e razionalistica – e contrapporsi alle posizioni di stampo naturalistico ravvisate nello storicismo assoluto e nell’idealismo. L’“ontologia sociale” dell’Autore, composta di “permanenze” o “verità sociali” – le principali sono la famiglia, la proprietà e lo Stato – si esplica in una fenomenologia – definita “diritto naturale cristiano” – nella quale la Filosofia del diritto si coniuga con la Filosofia della storia ed in cui costume, diritto e morale sono riuniti in una visione complessiva che si propone di stabilire una connessione tra ordine naturale, ordine sociale ed ordine interiore all’insegna di una visione sostanziale della giustizia ed in funzione della perfezione spirituale della persona. Lo studio si propone di inquadrare l’argomento nella discussione sul rapporto tra “verità” e “prassi” presente nella filosofia del diritto italiana del Novecento. Il lavoro intende anzitutto verificare in che termini il tentativo di sintesi tra “metafisica classica” e “filosofia dei valori” si inserisca nel diritto naturale classico e costituisca un’alternativa rispetto al giusnaturalismo moderno; in secondo luogo approfondisce i profili critici di tale prospettiva – il rapporto tra essenza ed esistenza, tra ordine e sistema, tra teologia, filosofia e scienza, tra fondamento e fonte dell’ordinamento giuridico, tra costume, morale e diritto – i quali consentono, per un verso, di affermare la straordinaria attualità della figura di Ambrosetti e, per altro verso, di individuare ulteriori percorsi di ricerca.

@article{costantini_folksonomies_2014-2,
	title = {\#{Folksonomies}: the next step forward to transparency?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {In this paper, I offer a theoretical perspective on the application of collective tagging system to the field of legal information management. I discuss the hypothesis that folksonomies could be a useful tool to increase the transparency of the legal system. The essay can be divided in three main parts. In the first section, I introduce the issue of transparency in the context of the legal system through an overview of different opinions outlined by contemporary legal philosophy, thereby confirming the overall formalistic perspective. In the second part, I show how transparency may correspond to the concept of “data sharing” that is achieved in the «many to many» communication through the Internet. In the third part, I analyse the collective tagging system after identifying the key element of Web 2.0 in the sharing of metadata, providing the definition of folksonomies and describing some features of its possible application to legal information management. In conclusion, I suggest that folksonomies could improve legal information management through Internet.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Jusletter IT},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	month = feb,
	year = {2014},
}

In this paper, I offer a theoretical perspective on the application of collective tagging system to the field of legal information management. I discuss the hypothesis that folksonomies could be a useful tool to increase the transparency of the legal system. The essay can be divided in three main parts. In the first section, I introduce the issue of transparency in the context of the legal system through an overview of different opinions outlined by contemporary legal philosophy, thereby confirming the overall formalistic perspective. In the second part, I show how transparency may correspond to the concept of “data sharing” that is achieved in the «many to many» communication through the Internet. In the third part, I analyse the collective tagging system after identifying the key element of Web 2.0 in the sharing of metadata, providing the definition of folksonomies and describing some features of its possible application to legal information management. In conclusion, I suggest that folksonomies could improve legal information management through Internet.

@incollection{costantini_folksonomies_2014-3,
	address = {Amsterdam},
	series = {Frontiers in {Artificial} {Intelligence} and {Applications}},
	title = {\#{Folksonomies} \& \#{Law}: from «quid juris?» to «quid jus?» to «cur jus?»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {{JURIX} 2014. {Proceedings} of the {Twenty}-seventh {Annual} {Conference}},
	publisher = {Ios Press},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Hoekstra, Rinke and Breuker, Joost and Guarino, Nicola and Kok, Joost N. and Liu, J. and Lopez de Mantaras, Ramon and Mizoguchi, R. and Musen, M. and Pal, S. K. and Zhong, N.},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {203--204},
}

@incollection{costantini_pretty_2014,
	address = {Fiume (Croazia)},
	title = {Pretty {Good} {Privacy}”. {Smuggling} in the “{Information} {Age}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {Smuggling {Anthologies}},
	publisher = {Rijeka Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Peraica, Ana},
	month = nov,
	year = {2014},
	pages = {303--311},
}

@article{costantini_unfair_2014,
	title = {\#{Unfair} \#{Law}: {Folksonomies} \& {Law} between {Openness} and {Knowledge}},
	volume = {1105},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	issn = {1613-0073},
	abstract = {In this poster I suggest that folksonomies could be fruitfully used in legal information management as a collective process of “codification” carried out by the users of legal documents available on line. In this sense, through the “lattice” topology of collective tagging systems could arise a synthesis between “openness” and “knowledge”, legal information retrieval and legal artificial reasoning.},
	number = {Proceedings of the First JURIX Doctoral Consortium and Poster Sessions in conjunction with the 26th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Bologna, Italy, December 11th-13th, 2013, Edited by Monica Palmirani and Giovanni Sartor},
	journal = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Palmirani, Monica and Sartor, Giovanni},
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {Folksonomies, Folksonomy, Legal artificial reasoning, Legal ontology, Semantic Web},
	pages = {84--86},
}

In this poster I suggest that folksonomies could be fruitfully used in legal information management as a collective process of “codification” carried out by the users of legal documents available on line. In this sense, through the “lattice” topology of collective tagging systems could arise a synthesis between “openness” and “knowledge”, legal information retrieval and legal artificial reasoning.

@article{costantini_recensione_2013,
	title = {Recensione a: {Gabriele} {De} {Anna}, {Azione} e rappresentanza. {Un} problema «metafisico» del liberalismo contemporaneo, {Edizioni} {Scientifiche} {Italiane} («{De} {Re} {Publica}»; 13), {Napoli} 2012},
	volume = {6},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Philosophical News},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {169--175},
}

@article{costantini_gabriele_2013,
	title = {Gabriele {De} {Anna} (a cura di), {Verità} e libertà. {Saggi} sul pensiero di {Cornelio} {Fabro}, {Napoli}, {Edizioni} {Scientifiche} {Italiane}, 2012, pp. 336},
	volume = {89},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1-2},
	journal = {Ce Fastu?},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {178--180},
}

@article{costantini_suggestioni_2012,
	title = {Suggestioni e provocazioni in “{La} democrazia nel {XXI} secolo” di {Vittorio} {Frosini}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {This essay exposes the book “La democrazia nel XXI secolo” (Democracy in the XXI century) by Vittorio Frosini. After a short summary of the chapters, the paper focuses on four main issues: (1) the statute of human being, resulting from the “methodological individualism” adopted by the author; (2) the philosophical meaning of the “technological society” depicted by Frosini as a “societas in interiore homine”; (3) the role of the “mass democracy” in the “Information Society”, provided that both find their grounds in an absolute concept of freedom; (4) the challenges arising from a moral point of view, and the solution found by Frosini in the “situation ethics”.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2012},
}

This essay exposes the book “La democrazia nel XXI secolo” (Democracy in the XXI century) by Vittorio Frosini. After a short summary of the chapters, the paper focuses on four main issues: (1) the statute of human being, resulting from the “methodological individualism” adopted by the author; (2) the philosophical meaning of the “technological society” depicted by Frosini as a “societas in interiore homine”; (3) the role of the “mass democracy” in the “Information Society”, provided that both find their grounds in an absolute concept of freedom; (4) the challenges arising from a moral point of view, and the solution found by Frosini in the “situation ethics”.

@article{costantini_diritto_2012,
	title = {“{Diritto} e {Religione}” {XXVIII} {Congresso} {Società} {Italiana} di {Filosofia} del diritto ({Monte} {Porzio} {Catone}, 20-22 settembre 2012)},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato»,},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2012},
}

@incollection{costantini_donne_2012,
	address = {Udine},
	series = {Donne e società},
	title = {Donne, impresa e {Digital} divide},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {978-88-8420-713-5},
	abstract = {Lo scopo del presente intervento è duplice: da un lato, delineare la ‘Società dell’Informazione’ quale contesto in cui si collocano le questioni attinenti alla condizione delle donne impegnate in una attività lavorativa; dall’altro, offrire alcune indicazioni che possano essere utili come criteri orientativi ‘pratici’ all’interno di un panorama in perenne mutamento. In merito al problema dello svantaggio sociale sofferto dalle donne in relazione all’utilizzo delle tecnologie informatiche, c.d. Digital divide, le pur lodevoli iniziative adottate a diversi livelli (internazionale, comunitario, nazionale e regionale) purtroppo non sono esenti dalle criticità che sono intrinseche ai loro stessi presupposti teoretici. In questa sede si sottolineano in particolare: (1) il carattere ideologico della concezione della ‘Società dell’Informazione’, con cenni di carattere storico-istituzionale ed esempi relativi ai più recenti sviluppi; (2) il razionalismo sottostante al Digital divide, come emergente dalla sua collocazione all’interno della fenomenologia storicistica delle ‘generazioni dei diritti umani’; (3) l’astrattezza della ‘cultura informatica’, che rappresenta non soltanto l’insieme di abilità nell’utilizzo degli strumenti elettronici, ma anche e soprattutto l’adesione ad una forma mentis tecnocratica che pone il problema della sua compatibilità con la naturale condizione femminile.},
	number = {4},
	booktitle = {Donne, politica e istituzioni: le imprese delle donne},
	publisher = {Forum Editrice},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Serafin, Silvana and Brollo, Marina},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {209--250},
}

Lo scopo del presente intervento è duplice: da un lato, delineare la ‘Società dell’Informazione’ quale contesto in cui si collocano le questioni attinenti alla condizione delle donne impegnate in una attività lavorativa; dall’altro, offrire alcune indicazioni che possano essere utili come criteri orientativi ‘pratici’ all’interno di un panorama in perenne mutamento. In merito al problema dello svantaggio sociale sofferto dalle donne in relazione all’utilizzo delle tecnologie informatiche, c.d. Digital divide, le pur lodevoli iniziative adottate a diversi livelli (internazionale, comunitario, nazionale e regionale) purtroppo non sono esenti dalle criticità che sono intrinseche ai loro stessi presupposti teoretici. In questa sede si sottolineano in particolare: (1) il carattere ideologico della concezione della ‘Società dell’Informazione’, con cenni di carattere storico-istituzionale ed esempi relativi ai più recenti sviluppi; (2) il razionalismo sottostante al Digital divide, come emergente dalla sua collocazione all’interno della fenomenologia storicistica delle ‘generazioni dei diritti umani’; (3) l’astrattezza della ‘cultura informatica’, che rappresenta non soltanto l’insieme di abilità nell’utilizzo degli strumenti elettronici, ma anche e soprattutto l’adesione ad una forma mentis tecnocratica che pone il problema della sua compatibilità con la naturale condizione femminile.

@incollection{costantini_il_2011,
	address = {Milano},
	series = {Leggi e lavoro},
	title = {Il trattamento dei dati personali da parte dei soggetti pubblici},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {18},
	booktitle = {Il {Collegato} {Lavoro} 2010. {Commentario} alla legge n. 183/2010},
	publisher = {Ipsoa},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Miscione, Michele and Garofalo, Domenico},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {671--679},
}

@article{costantini_galvao_2011,
	title = {Galvão de {Sousa} e la rappresentanza politica},
	volume = {CCXXXI},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Archivio Giuridico "Filippo Serafini"},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {223--250},
}

@article{costantini_radici_2011,
	title = {Radici e ragioni dell'antipolitica. {A} proposito di {M}. {Truffelli}, {L}'ombra della politica},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {The book L’ombra della politica, by Matteo Truffelli, expounds three thesis: (1) “antipolitics” can be represented as a consistent approach; (2) historically, the rise of “antipolitics” should be placed in the Sixteenth Century; (3) “antipolitics” can be considered as the “dark side” of “politics”, provided that both of them are grown directly from the same root, which is modern political philosophy. This article explores the content of the volume with regards to contemporary experience from a classical perspective of “politics”.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2011},
}

The book L’ombra della politica, by Matteo Truffelli, expounds three thesis: (1) “antipolitics” can be represented as a consistent approach; (2) historically, the rise of “antipolitics” should be placed in the Sixteenth Century; (3) “antipolitics” can be considered as the “dark side” of “politics”, provided that both of them are grown directly from the same root, which is modern political philosophy. This article explores the content of the volume with regards to contemporary experience from a classical perspective of “politics”.

@incollection{costantini_giustizia_2011,
	address = {Napoli},
	title = {La «giustizia elettronica» nell’{Unione} {Europea}: dallo jus commune alla «reciproca fiducia»?},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {Potere esecutivo e giurisdizionale nell'{Europa}},
	publisher = {Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Fracanzani, Marcello Maria and Palermo, Francesco},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {233--250},
}

@article{costantini_rezension_2010,
	title = {Rezension des {Sammelwerks} “{Das} {Asylrecht} in {Europa}: {Probleme} und {Perspektiven}” {Kongressbeiträge} des {Internationalen} {Institutes} "{Rosmini}" (trad. {Sabine} {Trevisani})},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2010},
}

@book{costantini_vittorio_2010,
	address = {Napoli},
	title = {Vittorio {Frosini}. {Genesi} filosofica e struttura giuridica della {Società} dell'{Informazione}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {Nel panorama italiano del pensiero giuridico e politico del Novecento, fra i tentativi di unificare Diritto, Politica ed Etica, quello di Vittorio Frosini (1922\_2001) può essere considerato tino dei più originali. Filosofo e giurista formatosi alla Normale di Pisa e ad Oxford, Frosini concepì un sistema teorico che racchiude una visione «profetica», trasfigurando il razionalismo moderno in un Credo che trova la sua matrice nell’idealismo di Giovanni Gentile e nella cibernetica la sua chiave espressiva. L’ordinamento giuridico e la comunità politica, intesi alla luce della morfologia goethiana come strutture simboliche, si realizzano nella dimensione trascendentale dell’esperienza rispettivamente come «coscienza nomologica» e come «coscienza politica» per incarnarsi nella figura «mitica» dello Stato. Nel celebrare le potenzialita «demiurgiche» dell’individuo, assunto come , homo artifex, l’Autore manifesta apertamente una sorta di «naturalismo» che rimane inconsapevole, implicito o nascosto in molti altri studiosi, soprattutto di Informatica giuridica. Il presente lavoro è il primo tentativo di esposizione organica del sistema frosiniano nel suo complesso e presenta al lettore \_ «filosofo», «giurista» o «informatico» che sia — un’introduzione critica al formalismo scientista e all’approccio cibernetico alle questioni giuridiche. Esso si propone infine di far emergere i pericoli della tecnocrazia confermati dalla somiglianza tra il paradigma dell’attuale Information Society e la societas in interiore homine gentiliana.},
	publisher = {Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2010},
}

Nel panorama italiano del pensiero giuridico e politico del Novecento, fra i tentativi di unificare Diritto, Politica ed Etica, quello di Vittorio Frosini (1922_2001) può essere considerato tino dei più originali. Filosofo e giurista formatosi alla Normale di Pisa e ad Oxford, Frosini concepì un sistema teorico che racchiude una visione «profetica», trasfigurando il razionalismo moderno in un Credo che trova la sua matrice nell’idealismo di Giovanni Gentile e nella cibernetica la sua chiave espressiva. L’ordinamento giuridico e la comunità politica, intesi alla luce della morfologia goethiana come strutture simboliche, si realizzano nella dimensione trascendentale dell’esperienza rispettivamente come «coscienza nomologica» e come «coscienza politica» per incarnarsi nella figura «mitica» dello Stato. Nel celebrare le potenzialita «demiurgiche» dell’individuo, assunto come , homo artifex, l’Autore manifesta apertamente una sorta di «naturalismo» che rimane inconsapevole, implicito o nascosto in molti altri studiosi, soprattutto di Informatica giuridica. Il presente lavoro è il primo tentativo di esposizione organica del sistema frosiniano nel suo complesso e presenta al lettore _ «filosofo», «giurista» o «informatico» che sia — un’introduzione critica al formalismo scientista e all’approccio cibernetico alle questioni giuridiche. Esso si propone infine di far emergere i pericoli della tecnocrazia confermati dalla somiglianza tra il paradigma dell’attuale Information Society e la societas in interiore homine gentiliana.

@article{costantini_il_2009,
	title = {Il contributo dei deputati friulani all'{Assemblea} {Costituente}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {1--8},
}

@article{costantini_il_2009-1,
	title = {Il diritto di asilo in {Europa}: problemi e prospettive},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Diritto e società},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {93--112},
}

@book{costantini_il_2008,
	address = {Udine},
	series = {Etica, {Politica}, {Diritto}. {Il} {Friuli} e la filosofia della prassi. {Testi}},
	title = {Il contributo dei deputati friulani all’{Assemblea} {Costituente}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {Il volume propone la documentazione dell'attività dei deputati friulani eletti all'Assemblea costituente nell'XI Circoscrizione, in altre Circoscrizioni o nel Collegio unico nazionale. Esso documenta non solamente il loro apporto alla discussione del progetto di Costituzione (approvato nel 1947) ma anche l'impegno profuso in sede parlamentare in anni difficili per la neonata Repubblica italiana.},
	publisher = {Forum Editrice},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Castellano, Danilo and Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2008},
}

Il volume propone la documentazione dell'attività dei deputati friulani eletti all'Assemblea costituente nell'XI Circoscrizione, in altre Circoscrizioni o nel Collegio unico nazionale. Esso documenta non solamente il loro apporto alla discussione del progetto di Costituzione (approvato nel 1947) ma anche l'impegno profuso in sede parlamentare in anni difficili per la neonata Repubblica italiana.

@article{costantini_europa_2007,
	title = {«{Europa}: definizioni e confini / {Europa}: {Definitionen} und {Grenzen}»},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {(1) - Premessa; (2) - Europa / Unione Europea; (3) - Europa / Chiesa / Unione Europea; (4) - Europa / Oriente / Occidente: i Balcani; (5) - Unione Europea / Europa unita; (6) - Conclusione},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Archivio Giuridico "Filippo Serafini"},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {143--158},
}

(1) - Premessa; (2) - Europa / Unione Europea; (3) - Europa / Chiesa / Unione Europea; (4) - Europa / Oriente / Occidente: i Balcani; (5) - Unione Europea / Europa unita; (6) - Conclusione

@book{costantini_cornelio_2007,
	address = {Udine},
	series = {Etica, {Politica}, {Diritto}. {Il} {Friuli} e la filosofia della prassi. {Serie} {Saggi}},
	title = {Cornelio {Fabro} e il problema della libertà},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	publisher = {Forum},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2007},
}

@article{costantini_morfogenesi_2007,
	title = {La ‘morfogenesi dell’ordinamento giuridico’ in {Vittorio} {Frosini}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2007},
}

@article{costantini_europa_2005,
	title = {L'{Europa} e la codificazione a 200 anni dal {Codice} {Napoleone}},
	volume = {CCXXV},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Archivio Giuridico "Filippo Serafini"},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {155--164},
}

@article{costantini_il_2005,
	title = {Il problema del metodo del diritto},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2005},
}

@book{costantini_costituzione_2005,
	address = {Napoli},
	series = {De {Re} {Publica}},
	title = {Costituzione europea, diritti umani e libertà religiosa},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {3},
	publisher = {Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane},
	author = {Costantini, Federico and Castellano, Danilo},
	editor = {Castellano, Danilo},
	year = {2005},
}

@incollection{costantini_aspetti_2004,
	address = {Udine},
	title = {Aspetti editoriali e giuridici legati alla pubblicazione degli e-book},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	abstract = {Il «nuovo diritto d’autore», introdotto con i trattati internazionali WIPO, il DMCA in U.S.A., la Dir. 29/2001/CE in Europa, il nostro D.Lgs. 68/2003, estende la tutela giuridica dal contenuto dell’opera alle «misure tecnologiche di protezione» del documento. L’e-book può essere inteso propriamente come vero e proprio ‘supporto digitale’, che permette all'autore di graduare la condivisione dell'opera con l’utente, controllandone la fruizione, e rappresenta, come esemplificato dal «caso Sklyarov» in U.S.A., il paradigma del «nuovo diritto d'autore», nel quale la norma giuridica assume un ruolo strumentale al controllo tecnologico sull’accesso alle risorse e sull’uso delle informazioni. Per quanto riguarda l'ordinamento italiano, si forniscono alcune indicazioni di massima, aggiornate al D.Lgs. 70/2003, sul regime delle figure che interagiscono attraverso l’e-book: autore, editore, content provider, fornitore del supporto, utente. Riguardo a quest’ultimo si sollevano rilevanti problemi riguardanti privacy ed e-commerce, che dimostrano le insuperabili difficoltà di fondo nascoste nella concezione del «diritto come procedura», la quale necessariamente riduce il Diritto a «tecnica di controllo sociale» del Potere, e non, come invece dovrebbe essere, «modo di comunicazione interpersonale».},
	booktitle = {E-learning: strumenti e modelli per la formazione},
	publisher = {Forum editrice},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Tellia, Bruno},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {183--209},
}

Il «nuovo diritto d’autore», introdotto con i trattati internazionali WIPO, il DMCA in U.S.A., la Dir. 29/2001/CE in Europa, il nostro D.Lgs. 68/2003, estende la tutela giuridica dal contenuto dell’opera alle «misure tecnologiche di protezione» del documento. L’e-book può essere inteso propriamente come vero e proprio ‘supporto digitale’, che permette all'autore di graduare la condivisione dell'opera con l’utente, controllandone la fruizione, e rappresenta, come esemplificato dal «caso Sklyarov» in U.S.A., il paradigma del «nuovo diritto d'autore», nel quale la norma giuridica assume un ruolo strumentale al controllo tecnologico sull’accesso alle risorse e sull’uso delle informazioni. Per quanto riguarda l'ordinamento italiano, si forniscono alcune indicazioni di massima, aggiornate al D.Lgs. 70/2003, sul regime delle figure che interagiscono attraverso l’e-book: autore, editore, content provider, fornitore del supporto, utente. Riguardo a quest’ultimo si sollevano rilevanti problemi riguardanti privacy ed e-commerce, che dimostrano le insuperabili difficoltà di fondo nascoste nella concezione del «diritto come procedura», la quale necessariamente riduce il Diritto a «tecnica di controllo sociale» del Potere, e non, come invece dovrebbe essere, «modo di comunicazione interpersonale».

@incollection{costantini_giustizia_2004,
	address = {Padova},
	title = {Giustizia come armonia nell’{Ifigenia} in {Tauride}. {L}’opera italiana di {Goethe}},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	booktitle = {Dike {Polypoinos}. {Archetipi} di giustizia fra tragedia greca e dramma moderno, con introduzione di {Franco} {Todescan}},
	publisher = {Cleup},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	editor = {Bombelli, Giovanni and Mazzei, Alessandra},
	year = {2004},
}

@article{costantini_il_2003,
	title = {Il "commercio elettronico" tra sovranità e sussidiarietà. {Primo} commento al {Decreto} {Legislativo} 70 del 2003},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2003},
}

@article{costantini_sulla_2003,
	title = {Sulla natura "paragiurisdizionale" del {Garante} per la {Protezione} dei {Dati} {Personali}. {Nota} a {Cassazione} {Civile}, sez. {I}, 20 maggio 2002, n. 7341},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {2},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2003},
}

@article{costantini_il_2002,
	title = {Il concetto di "persona" nella legge "sulla privacy"},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	number = {1},
	journal = {L'Ircocervo. Rivista elettronica italiana di metodologia giuridica, teoria generale del diritto e dottrina dello Stato},
	author = {Costantini, Federico},
	year = {2002},
}