Measuring asymmetry in facial morphea via 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Abbas, L. F, Joseph, A. K, Day, J., Cole, N. A, Hallac, R., Derderian, C., & Jacobe, H. T Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 88(1):101–108, January, 2023. Place: United States Publisher: Mosby
Measuring asymmetry in facial morphea via 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Background: Objectively determining tissue loss in craniofacial morphea is challenging. However, 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive modality that may be a useful adjunct.; Objective: To prospectively evaluate 3D stereophotogrammetry in the assessment of craniofacial linear morphea.; Methods: Participants underwent clinical, quality-of-life, and 3D-stereophotogrammetry assessments. Traditional photographs and 3D-stereophotogrammetry images were rated as mild, moderate, or severe by 2 experts and 2 nonexperts. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliability (on delayed rescoring) were calculated.; Results: Of 23 patients with craniofacial morphea, 3D stereophotogrammetry detected pathologic asymmetry in 14 (20.6%) patients. Providers rated patients as more severely affected when using 3D stereophotogrammetry versus when using traditional photographs (19% severe on 3D stereophotogrammetry vs 0% severe on traditional photographs, P = .004). Qualitative ratings of both traditional and 3D images showed high inter- and intrarater reliability between experts and nonexperts alike. Physicians' Global Assessment of Damage scores correlated with mouth asymmetry (P = .0021), cheek asymmetry (P = .04), and 3D-stereophotogrammetry ratings (median, mild: 27.5 vs moderate: 46.5 vs severe: 64, P = .0152). Lower face asymmetry correlated with worse quality-of-life scores (P = .013).; Limitations: Small sample size and cross-sectional design.; Conclusion: 3D stereophotogrammetry can reliably detect and quantify asymmetry in craniofacial morphea with greater sensitivity than that observed with traditional assessment alone. 3D stereophotogrammetry may be a useful adjunct to clinical examination.; Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed. (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
@article{abbas_measuring_2023,
	title = {Measuring asymmetry in facial morphea via 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.},
	volume = {88},
	issn = {1097-6787},
	url = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=35643243&site=ehost-live&scope=site},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jaad.2022.05.029},
	abstract = {Background: Objectively determining tissue loss in craniofacial morphea is challenging. However, 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive modality that may be a useful adjunct.; Objective: To prospectively evaluate 3D stereophotogrammetry in the assessment of craniofacial linear morphea.; Methods: Participants underwent clinical, quality-of-life, and 3D-stereophotogrammetry assessments. Traditional photographs and 3D-stereophotogrammetry images were rated as mild, moderate, or severe by 2 experts and 2 nonexperts. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliability (on delayed rescoring) were calculated.; Results: Of 23 patients with craniofacial morphea, 3D stereophotogrammetry detected pathologic asymmetry in 14 (20.6\%) patients. Providers rated patients as more severely affected when using 3D stereophotogrammetry versus when using traditional photographs (19\% severe on 3D stereophotogrammetry vs 0\% severe on traditional photographs, P = .004). Qualitative ratings of both traditional and 3D images showed high inter- and intrarater reliability between experts and nonexperts alike. Physicians' Global Assessment of Damage scores correlated with mouth asymmetry (P = .0021), cheek asymmetry (P = .04), and 3D-stereophotogrammetry ratings (median, mild: 27.5 vs moderate: 46.5 vs severe: 64, P = .0152). Lower face asymmetry correlated with worse quality-of-life scores (P = .013).; Limitations: Small sample size and cross-sectional design.; Conclusion: 3D stereophotogrammetry can reliably detect and quantify asymmetry in craniofacial morphea with greater sensitivity than that observed with traditional assessment alone. 3D stereophotogrammetry may be a useful adjunct to clinical examination.; Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed. (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology},
	author = {Abbas, Laila F and Joseph, Adrienne K and Day, Jennifer and Cole, Naomi A and Hallac, Rami and Derderian, Christopher and Jacobe, Heidi T},
	month = jan,
	year = {2023},
	note = {Place: United States
Publisher: Mosby},
	keywords = {3D-stereophotogrammetry, Cross-Sectional Studies, Face, Humans, Parry Romberg syndrome, Photogrammetry, Reproducibility of Results, Scleroderma, Localized*/complications, Scleroderma, Localized*/diagnostic imaging, craniofacial morphea, imaging, localized scleroderma, morphea, morphea en coup de sabre, rheumatologic dermatology},
	pages = {101--108},
}

Downloads: 0