A Low-Complexity, Low-Cycle-Slip-Probability, Format-Independent Carrier Estimator with Adaptive Filter Length. Adaickalavan Meiyappan, Hoon Kim, & Pooi-Yuen Kam Journal of Lightwave Technology, 31(23):3806–3812, December, 2013. Paper abstract bibtex We present a low-complexity carrier estimator with an effective filter length that automatically adapts according to the signal-to-noise ratio, laser-linewidth-symbol-duration product, nonlinear phase noise, and modulation format. Laser-linewidth and frequency-offset tolerances are studied. The filter length of a carrier estimator is shown to affect the cycle slip probability besides the bit-error rate (BER) performance. Considering that forward-error-correction codes are not robust to burst errors and phase slips, we demonstrate that filter-length optimization is necessary to avoid spectral-efficiency reduction in pilot assisted systems and potential system failures in differential encoding systems. Our estimator achieves a lower cycle slip probability and a greater nonlinear phase noise tolerance than DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and complex-weighted decision-aided maximum-likelihood (CW-DA-ML) estimator. DiffFE-MPE and DiffFE-BPS refer to the differential frequency estimator (DiffFE) followed by block \$M\{th\}\$ power phase estimator (MPE) and blind phase search (BPS), respectively. For a 4100 km quaternary phase-shift keying transmission at a BER of \$\{2.5\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 2\}\$ , our estimator achieves a cycle slip probability of \$\{2.9\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 7\}\$ compared to \$\{5.6\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 6\}, \{5.3\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 6\} \$ , and \$\{3.2\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 7\} \$ for DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and CW-DA-ML, respectively.
@article{adaickalavan_meiyappan_low-complexity_2013,
title = {A {Low}-{Complexity}, {Low}-{Cycle}-{Slip}-{Probability}, {Format}-{Independent} {Carrier} {Estimator} with {Adaptive} {Filter} {Length}},
volume = {31},
copyright = {\&\#169; 2013 IEEE},
url = {https://www.osapublishing.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?uri=jlt-31-23-3806},
abstract = {We present a low-complexity carrier estimator with an effective filter length that automatically adapts according to the signal-to-noise ratio, laser-linewidth-symbol-duration product, nonlinear phase noise, and modulation format. Laser-linewidth and frequency-offset tolerances are studied. The filter length of a carrier estimator is shown to affect the cycle slip probability besides the bit-error rate (BER) performance. Considering that forward-error-correction codes are not robust to burst errors and phase slips, we demonstrate that filter-length optimization is necessary to avoid spectral-efficiency reduction in pilot assisted systems and potential system failures in differential encoding systems. Our estimator achieves a lower cycle slip probability and a greater nonlinear phase noise tolerance than DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and complex-weighted decision-aided maximum-likelihood (CW-DA-ML) estimator. DiffFE-MPE and DiffFE-BPS refer to the differential frequency estimator (DiffFE) followed by block \$M\{th\}\$ power phase estimator (MPE) and blind phase search (BPS), respectively. For a 4100 km quaternary phase-shift keying transmission at a BER of \$\{2.5\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 2\}\$ , our estimator achieves a cycle slip probability of \$\{2.9\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 7\}\$ compared to \$\{5.6\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 6\}, \{5.3\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 6\} \$ , and \$\{3.2\} {\textbackslash}times \{10\}{\textasciicircum}\{ - 7\} \$ for DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and CW-DA-ML, respectively.},
language = {EN},
number = {23},
urldate = {2018-10-26TZ},
journal = {Journal of Lightwave Technology},
author = {{Adaickalavan Meiyappan} and {Hoon Kim} and {Pooi-Yuen Kam}},
month = dec,
year = {2013},
keywords = {Bit error rate, Phase noise, Quadrature phase shift keying},
pages = {3806--3812}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"SX5dMYcF6x35XsieJ","bibbaseid":"adaickalavanmeiyappan-hoonkim-pooiyuenkam-alowcomplexitylowcycleslipprobabilityformatindependentcarrierestimatorwithadaptivefilterlength-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-17T02:48:47.014Z","title":"A Low-Complexity, Low-Cycle-Slip-Probability, Format-Independent Carrier Estimator with Adaptive Filter Length","author_short":["Adaickalavan Meiyappan","Hoon Kim","Pooi-Yuen Kam"],"year":2013,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/5271339/collections/JT8EIMUS/items?key=1c03z2j6lpjrlmoQkhbcUwVB&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A Low-Complexity, Low-Cycle-Slip-Probability, Format-Independent Carrier Estimator with Adaptive Filter Length","volume":"31","copyright":"© 2013 IEEE","url":"https://www.osapublishing.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?uri=jlt-31-23-3806","abstract":"We present a low-complexity carrier estimator with an effective filter length that automatically adapts according to the signal-to-noise ratio, laser-linewidth-symbol-duration product, nonlinear phase noise, and modulation format. Laser-linewidth and frequency-offset tolerances are studied. The filter length of a carrier estimator is shown to affect the cycle slip probability besides the bit-error rate (BER) performance. Considering that forward-error-correction codes are not robust to burst errors and phase slips, we demonstrate that filter-length optimization is necessary to avoid spectral-efficiency reduction in pilot assisted systems and potential system failures in differential encoding systems. Our estimator achieves a lower cycle slip probability and a greater nonlinear phase noise tolerance than DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and complex-weighted decision-aided maximum-likelihood (CW-DA-ML) estimator. DiffFE-MPE and DiffFE-BPS refer to the differential frequency estimator (DiffFE) followed by block \\$M\\{th\\}\\$ power phase estimator (MPE) and blind phase search (BPS), respectively. For a 4100 km quaternary phase-shift keying transmission at a BER of \\$\\{2.5\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 2\\}\\$ , our estimator achieves a cycle slip probability of \\$\\{2.9\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 7\\}\\$ compared to \\$\\{5.6\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 6\\}, \\{5.3\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 6\\} \\$ , and \\$\\{3.2\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 7\\} \\$ for DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and CW-DA-ML, respectively.","language":"EN","number":"23","urldate":"2018-10-26TZ","journal":"Journal of Lightwave Technology","author":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Adaickalavan Meiyappan"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hoon Kim"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pooi-Yuen Kam"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2013","keywords":"Bit error rate, Phase noise, Quadrature phase shift keying","pages":"3806–3812","bibtex":"@article{adaickalavan_meiyappan_low-complexity_2013,\n\ttitle = {A {Low}-{Complexity}, {Low}-{Cycle}-{Slip}-{Probability}, {Format}-{Independent} {Carrier} {Estimator} with {Adaptive} {Filter} {Length}},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tcopyright = {\\&\\#169; 2013 IEEE},\n\turl = {https://www.osapublishing.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?uri=jlt-31-23-3806},\n\tabstract = {We present a low-complexity carrier estimator with an effective filter length that automatically adapts according to the signal-to-noise ratio, laser-linewidth-symbol-duration product, nonlinear phase noise, and modulation format. Laser-linewidth and frequency-offset tolerances are studied. The filter length of a carrier estimator is shown to affect the cycle slip probability besides the bit-error rate (BER) performance. Considering that forward-error-correction codes are not robust to burst errors and phase slips, we demonstrate that filter-length optimization is necessary to avoid spectral-efficiency reduction in pilot assisted systems and potential system failures in differential encoding systems. Our estimator achieves a lower cycle slip probability and a greater nonlinear phase noise tolerance than DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and complex-weighted decision-aided maximum-likelihood (CW-DA-ML) estimator. DiffFE-MPE and DiffFE-BPS refer to the differential frequency estimator (DiffFE) followed by block \\$M\\{th\\}\\$ power phase estimator (MPE) and blind phase search (BPS), respectively. For a 4100 km quaternary phase-shift keying transmission at a BER of \\$\\{2.5\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 2\\}\\$ , our estimator achieves a cycle slip probability of \\$\\{2.9\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 7\\}\\$ compared to \\$\\{5.6\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 6\\}, \\{5.3\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 6\\} \\$ , and \\$\\{3.2\\} {\\textbackslash}times \\{10\\}{\\textasciicircum}\\{ - 7\\} \\$ for DiffFE-MPE, DiffFE-BPS, and CW-DA-ML, respectively.},\n\tlanguage = {EN},\n\tnumber = {23},\n\turldate = {2018-10-26TZ},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Lightwave Technology},\n\tauthor = {{Adaickalavan Meiyappan} and {Hoon Kim} and {Pooi-Yuen Kam}},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Bit error rate, Phase noise, Quadrature phase shift keying},\n\tpages = {3806--3812}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Adaickalavan Meiyappan","Hoon Kim","Pooi-Yuen Kam"],"key":"adaickalavan_meiyappan_low-complexity_2013","id":"adaickalavan_meiyappan_low-complexity_2013","bibbaseid":"adaickalavanmeiyappan-hoonkim-pooiyuenkam-alowcomplexitylowcycleslipprobabilityformatindependentcarrierestimatorwithadaptivefilterlength-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.osapublishing.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?uri=jlt-31-23-3806"},"keyword":["Bit error rate","Phase noise","Quadrature phase shift keying"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["low","complexity","low","cycle","slip","probability","format","independent","carrier","estimator","adaptive","filter","length","adaickalavan meiyappan","hoon kim","pooi-yuen kam"],"keywords":["bit error rate","phase noise","quadrature phase shift keying"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["kbNXHY9LnR4FTB2ae"]}