Elite Tweets: Analyzing the Twitter Communication Patterns of Labour Party Peers in the House of Lords. Adi, A., Erickson, K., & Lilleker, D. G. Policy & Internet, 6(1):1–27, March, 2014. Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
doi  abstract   bibtex   
The microblogging platform Twitter has gained notoriety for its status as both a communication channel between private individuals and as a public forum monitored by journalists, the public, and the state. Its potential application for political communication has not gone unnoticed; politicians have used Twitter to attract voters, interact with constituencies and advance issue-based campaigns. This article reports findings from the research team's work with 21 peers sitting on the Labour frontbench. The researchers monitored and archived the peers' activity on Twitter for a period of 3 months between June and September 2012. Using a sample of 4,363 tweets and a mixed methodology combining semantic analysis, social network analysis, and quantitative analysis, this article explores the peers' patterns of usage and communication on Twitter. Key findings are that as a tweeting community their behavior is consistent with other communities. However, there is evidence that a coherent strategy is lacking in their coordinated use of the platform. Labour peers tend to work in small, clustered networks of self-interest as opposed to collectively to promote party policy. © 2014 Policy Studies Organization.
@article{adi_elite_2014,
	title = {Elite {Tweets}: {Analyzing} the {Twitter} {Communication} {Patterns} of {Labour} {Party} {Peers} in the {House} of {Lords}},
	volume = {6},
	issn = {19442866},
	doi = {10.1002/1944-2866.POI350},
	abstract = {The microblogging platform Twitter has gained notoriety for its status as both a communication channel between private individuals and as a public forum monitored by journalists, the public, and the state. Its potential application for political communication has not gone unnoticed; politicians have used Twitter to attract voters, interact with constituencies and advance issue-based campaigns. This article reports findings from the research team's work with 21 peers sitting on the Labour frontbench. The researchers monitored and archived the peers' activity on Twitter for a period of 3 months between June and September 2012. Using a sample of 4,363 tweets and a mixed methodology combining semantic analysis, social network analysis, and quantitative analysis, this article explores the peers' patterns of usage and communication on Twitter. Key findings are that as a tweeting community their behavior is consistent with other communities. However, there is evidence that a coherent strategy is lacking in their coordinated use of the platform. Labour peers tend to work in small, clustered networks of self-interest as opposed to collectively to promote party policy. © 2014 Policy Studies Organization.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2020-06-04},
	journal = {Policy \& Internet},
	author = {Adi, Ana and Erickson, Kristofer and Lilleker, Darren G.},
	month = mar,
	year = {2014},
	note = {Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd},
	keywords = {House of Lords, Twitter, U.K. Labour Party, elite groups, semantic analysis, social network analysis},
	pages = {1--27},
}

Downloads: 0