Deontic contexts and the interpretation of disjunction in legal discourse. Aher, M. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique, 58(1):13–42, 2013.
Paper doi abstract bibtex This study investigates the interpretation of or in legal texts, focusing on two puzzles: ``inclusive/exclusive'' or and ``free choice permission''. The study first examines various examples of or in American court cases described by Solan and the ``and/or'' rule that he describes. It then turns to occurrences of or in a different legal domain, that of the World Trade Organization, giving a brief introduction to the WTO dispute mechanism and its principles of interpretation before examining these occurrences of or. The study then introduces the inquisitive semantics framework as a way to account for these occurrences, offering an analysis of the inclusive/exclusive or and free choice or puzzles and of the interaction of or with obligation, permission, and negation more generally.
@article{Aher:13,
abstract = {This study investigates the interpretation of or in legal texts, focusing on two puzzles: ``inclusive/exclusive'' or and ``free choice permission''. The study first examines various examples of or in American court cases described by Solan and the ``and/or'' rule that he describes. It then turns to occurrences of or in a different legal domain, that of the World Trade Organization, giving a brief introduction to the WTO dispute mechanism and its principles of interpretation before examining these occurrences of or. The study then introduces the inquisitive semantics framework as a way to account for these occurrences, offering an analysis of the inclusive/exclusive or and free choice or puzzles and of the interaction of or with obligation, permission, and negation more generally.},
author = {Aher, Martin},
date-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
date-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},
doi = {10.1017/S0008413100002504},
journal = {The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique},
number = {1},
pages = {13--42},
title = {Deontic contexts and the interpretation of disjunction in legal discourse},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2},
volume = {58},
year = {2013},
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2},
Bdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100002504}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"wSieLGGhLSfu4G2aF","bibbaseid":"aher-deonticcontextsandtheinterpretationofdisjunctioninlegaldiscourse-2013","author_short":["Aher, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"This study investigates the interpretation of or in legal texts, focusing on two puzzles: ``inclusive/exclusive'' or and ``free choice permission''. The study first examines various examples of or in American court cases described by Solan and the ``and/or'' rule that he describes. It then turns to occurrences of or in a different legal domain, that of the World Trade Organization, giving a brief introduction to the WTO dispute mechanism and its principles of interpretation before examining these occurrences of or. The study then introduces the inquisitive semantics framework as a way to account for these occurrences, offering an analysis of the inclusive/exclusive or and free choice or puzzles and of the interaction of or with obligation, permission, and negation more generally.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Aher"],"firstnames":["Martin"],"suffixes":[]}],"date-added":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","date-modified":"2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000","doi":"10.1017/S0008413100002504","journal":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique","number":"1","pages":"13–42","title":"Deontic contexts and the interpretation of disjunction in legal discourse","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2","volume":"58","year":"2013","bdsk-url-1":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2","bdsk-url-2":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100002504","bibtex":"@article{Aher:13,\n\tabstract = {This study investigates the interpretation of or in legal texts, focusing on two puzzles: ``inclusive/exclusive'' or and ``free choice permission''. The study first examines various examples of or in American court cases described by Solan and the ``and/or'' rule that he describes. It then turns to occurrences of or in a different legal domain, that of the World Trade Organization, giving a brief introduction to the WTO dispute mechanism and its principles of interpretation before examining these occurrences of or. The study then introduces the inquisitive semantics framework as a way to account for these occurrences, offering an analysis of the inclusive/exclusive or and free choice or puzzles and of the interaction of or with obligation, permission, and negation more generally.},\n\tauthor = {Aher, Martin},\n\tdate-added = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tdate-modified = {2021-08-17 00:00:00 +0000},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0008413100002504},\n\tjournal = {The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tpages = {13--42},\n\ttitle = {Deontic contexts and the interpretation of disjunction in legal discourse},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2},\n\tvolume = {58},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2},\n\tBdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100002504}}\n\n","author_short":["Aher, M."],"key":"Aher:13","id":"Aher:13","bibbaseid":"aher-deonticcontextsandtheinterpretationofdisjunctioninlegaldiscourse-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-linguistics-revue-canadienne-de-linguistique/article/abs/deontic-contexts-and-the-interpretation-of-disjunction-in-legal-discourse/BD235B19275EB4EFF3AF079B72750DD2"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://projects.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics/assets/files/papers.bib","dataSources":["x2Aox4ZP7RsyuDjWX","LaLDs2mrYhQpgH6Lk"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["deontic","contexts","interpretation","disjunction","legal","discourse","aher"],"title":"Deontic contexts and the interpretation of disjunction in legal discourse","year":2013}