Updating RDFS ABoxes and TBoxes in SPARQL. Ahmeti, A., Calvanese, D., & Polleres, A. In Proceedings of the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014), of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), October, 2014. Springer. Paper abstract bibtex Updates in RDF stores have recently been standardised in the SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. However, computing answers entailed by ontologies in triple stores is usually treated orthogonal to updates. Even the W3C's recent SPARQL 1.1 Update language and SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes specifications explicitly exclude a standard behaviour how SPARQL endpoints should treat entailment regimes other than simple entailment in the context of updates. In this paper, we outline different routes to close this gap. We define a fragment of SPARQL basic graph patterns corresponding to (the RDFS fragment of) DL-Lite and the corresponding SPARQL update language, dealing with updates both of ABox and of TBox statements. We discuss possible semantics along with potential strategies for implementing them. We treat both, (i) materialised RDF stores, which store all entailed triples explicitly, and (ii) reduced RDF Stores, that is, redundancy-free RDF stores that do not store any RDF triples (corresponding to DL-Lite ABox statements) entailed by others already.
@inproceedings{ahme-etal-2014iswc,
title = {Updating {RDFS} {ABoxes} and {TBoxes} in {SPARQL}},
abstract = {Updates in RDF stores have recently been standardised in the SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. However, computing answers entailed by ontologies in triple stores is usually treated orthogonal to updates. Even the W3C's recent SPARQL 1.1 Update language and SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes specifications explicitly exclude a standard behaviour how SPARQL endpoints should treat entailment regimes other than simple entailment in the context of updates. In this paper, we outline different routes to close this gap. We define a fragment of SPARQL basic graph patterns corresponding to (the RDFS fragment of) DL-Lite and the corresponding SPARQL update language, dealing with updates both of ABox and of TBox statements. We discuss possible semantics along with potential strategies for implementing them. We treat both, (i) materialised RDF stores, which store all entailed triples explicitly, and (ii) reduced RDF Stores, that is, redundancy-free RDF stores that do not store any RDF triples (corresponding to DL-Lite ABox statements) entailed by others already.},
author = {Albin Ahmeti and Diego Calvanese and Axel Polleres},
Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014)},
Day = {19--23},
Month = oct,
Publisher = {Springer},
Series = LNCS,
Type = CONF,
url = {http://www.polleres.net/publications/ahme-etal-2014iswc.pdf},
Year = 2014,
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"qkKpat8dKQQRkoe4W","bibbaseid":"ahmeti-calvanese-polleres-updatingrdfsaboxesandtboxesinsparql-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-12-08T08:58:02.563Z","title":"Updating RDFS ABoxes and TBoxes in SPARQL","author_short":["Ahmeti, A.","Calvanese, D.","Polleres, A."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"www.polleres.net/mypublications.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"Conference paper","title":"Updating RDFS ABoxes and TBoxes in SPARQL","abstract":"Updates in RDF stores have recently been standardised in the SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. However, computing answers entailed by ontologies in triple stores is usually treated orthogonal to updates. Even the W3C's recent SPARQL 1.1 Update language and SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes specifications explicitly exclude a standard behaviour how SPARQL endpoints should treat entailment regimes other than simple entailment in the context of updates. In this paper, we outline different routes to close this gap. We define a fragment of SPARQL basic graph patterns corresponding to (the RDFS fragment of) DL-Lite and the corresponding SPARQL update language, dealing with updates both of ABox and of TBox statements. We discuss possible semantics along with potential strategies for implementing them. We treat both, (i) materialised RDF stores, which store all entailed triples explicitly, and (ii) reduced RDF Stores, that is, redundancy-free RDF stores that do not store any RDF triples (corresponding to DL-Lite ABox statements) entailed by others already.","author":[{"firstnames":["Albin"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ahmeti"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Diego"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Calvanese"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Axel"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Polleres"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Proceedings of the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014)","day":"19–23","month":"October","publisher":"Springer","series":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)","url":"http://www.polleres.net/publications/ahme-etal-2014iswc.pdf","year":"2014","bibtex":"@inproceedings{ahme-etal-2014iswc,\n\ttitle = {Updating {RDFS} {ABoxes} and {TBoxes} in {SPARQL}},\n abstract = {Updates in RDF stores have recently been standardised in the SPARQL 1.1 Update specification. However, computing answers entailed by ontologies in triple stores is usually treated orthogonal to updates. Even the W3C's recent SPARQL 1.1 Update language and SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes specifications explicitly exclude a standard behaviour how SPARQL endpoints should treat entailment regimes other than simple entailment in the context of updates. In this paper, we outline different routes to close this gap. We define a fragment of SPARQL basic graph patterns corresponding to (the RDFS fragment of) DL-Lite and the corresponding SPARQL update language, dealing with updates both of ABox and of TBox statements. We discuss possible semantics along with potential strategies for implementing them. We treat both, (i) materialised RDF stores, which store all entailed triples explicitly, and (ii) reduced RDF Stores, that is, redundancy-free RDF stores that do not store any RDF triples (corresponding to DL-Lite ABox statements) entailed by others already.},\n author = {Albin Ahmeti and Diego Calvanese and Axel Polleres},\n Booktitle = {Proceedings of the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014)},\n\tDay = {19--23},\n\tMonth = oct,\n\tPublisher = {Springer},\n\tSeries = LNCS,\n\tType = CONF,\n url = {http://www.polleres.net/publications/ahme-etal-2014iswc.pdf},\n\tYear = 2014,\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ahmeti, A.","Calvanese, D.","Polleres, A."],"key":"ahme-etal-2014iswc","id":"ahme-etal-2014iswc","bibbaseid":"ahmeti-calvanese-polleres-updatingrdfsaboxesandtboxesinsparql-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.polleres.net/publications/ahme-etal-2014iswc.pdf"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"polleres, a":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=www.polleres.net/mypublications.bib"}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["updating","rdfs","aboxes","tboxes","sparql","ahmeti","calvanese","polleres"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":["545720922abc8e9f370000ae","5PFMiHGwfvbGBZwWF","5de7280d97054edf010000c3","5e02b1a419da8edf01000028","5e048450db7916df010000b1","5e06d565a0810cde0100009b","5e10e27445c12cde01000062","5e123345c196d3de01000074","5e14ba61e55ed8de01000072","5e189b4e779abfdf0100013f","5e216f7e5a651cdf010000eb","5e25b9fdf299d4de01000001","5e2d64605e7586df01000083","5e36e5e9b26a0fde0100005e","5e37d23b56571fde010000de","5e4ded1052c311f20100018e","5e51a3102793ecde010000e0","5e59a6b5ad6c7fde01000114","5e5d588ead47bcde01000072","5e60e857839e59df010000f1","A5AFuDAiNR4HEYiFD","BtzwZ6TFPsASbdqvo","DLdeXAmrbA4niYQzH","FyLDFGg993nDS2Spf","NCjPvWahWRjdP3ghB","XcyP3jptz7zE4ZLws","aiXjXMLP63k5WCt84","fTDcT5K3oSTcdxSBj","fbKNfWffDzdzubrER","haaAs2rQaQA7EaZva","nQX2P8WzFeKwcpLqd","nuWuyLnGu7YzMrn4d","pfENTBFWo85mRy3ik","rX6EShFR2rMFmQL2C","w6wHZukTjqqera7BR","woa42kCD35yCmdQTj","yPgvarsL7KAT9yfZd","yzkCNJMYNL8B3bni2","zDG3tj87ZfYXo7u9c"],"dataSources":["cBfwyqsLFQQMc4Fss","QfLT6siHZuHw9MqvK","gixxkiKt6rtWGoKSh"]}