@incollection{albert_understanding_2014,
	series = {Political {Power} and {Social} {Theory}},
	title = {Understanding {Change} in {Academic} {Knowledge} {Production} in a {Neoliberal} {Era}☆{Authorship} in alphabetical order; this paper has been authored equally.},
	volume = {27},
	isbn = {978-1-78350-668-2 978-1-78350-667-5},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present and apply a new framework – the Poles of Production for Producers/Poles of Production for Users (PFP/PFU) model – to empirically study how one particular group of academic scientists has responded to neoliberal changes in science policy and funding in Canada. The data we use are from a qualitative case study of 20 basic health scientists affiliated with a research-intensive university in a large Canadian city. We use the PFP/PFU model to explore the symbolic strategies (the vision of scientific quality) and practical strategies (the acquisition of funding and production of knowledge outputs) scientists adopt to maintain or advance their own position of power in the scientific field. We also compare similarities and differences among scientists trained before and after the rise of neoliberal policy. The PFP/PFU model allows us to see how these individual strategies cumulatively contribute to the construction of dominant and alternate modes of knowledge production. We argue that the alignments and misalignments between quality vision and practice that scientists in this study experienced reflect the symbolic struggles that are occurring among scientists, and between the scientific and political field, over two competing logics and reward systems (PFP/PFU).},
	urldate = {2022-11-22},
	booktitle = {Fields of {Knowledge}: {Science}, {Politics} and {Publics} in the {Neoliberal} {Age}},
	publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
	author = {Albert, Mathieu and McGuire, Wendy},
	month = jan,
	year = {2014},
	doi = {10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009},
	pages = {33--57},
}

{"_id":"SixBYWnt2tMW6MYGd","bibbaseid":"albert-mcguire-understandingchangeinacademicknowledgeproductioninaneoliberaleraauthorshipinalphabeticalorderthispaperhasbeenauthoredequally-2014","author_short":["Albert, M.","McGuire, W."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","series":"Political Power and Social Theory","title":"Understanding Change in Academic Knowledge Production in a Neoliberal Era☆Authorship in alphabetical order; this paper has been authored equally.","volume":"27","isbn":"978-1-78350-668-2 978-1-78350-667-5","url":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009","abstract":"In this paper, we present and apply a new framework – the Poles of Production for Producers/Poles of Production for Users (PFP/PFU) model – to empirically study how one particular group of academic scientists has responded to neoliberal changes in science policy and funding in Canada. The data we use are from a qualitative case study of 20 basic health scientists affiliated with a research-intensive university in a large Canadian city. We use the PFP/PFU model to explore the symbolic strategies (the vision of scientific quality) and practical strategies (the acquisition of funding and production of knowledge outputs) scientists adopt to maintain or advance their own position of power in the scientific field. We also compare similarities and differences among scientists trained before and after the rise of neoliberal policy. The PFP/PFU model allows us to see how these individual strategies cumulatively contribute to the construction of dominant and alternate modes of knowledge production. We argue that the alignments and misalignments between quality vision and practice that scientists in this study experienced reflect the symbolic struggles that are occurring among scientists, and between the scientific and political field, over two competing logics and reward systems (PFP/PFU).","urldate":"2022-11-22","booktitle":"Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age","publisher":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Albert"],"firstnames":["Mathieu"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["McGuire"],"firstnames":["Wendy"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2014","doi":"10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009","pages":"33–57","bibtex":"@incollection{albert_understanding_2014,\n\tseries = {Political {Power} and {Social} {Theory}},\n\ttitle = {Understanding {Change} in {Academic} {Knowledge} {Production} in a {Neoliberal} {Era}☆{Authorship} in alphabetical order; this paper has been authored equally.},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tisbn = {978-1-78350-668-2 978-1-78350-667-5},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009},\n\tabstract = {In this paper, we present and apply a new framework – the Poles of Production for Producers/Poles of Production for Users (PFP/PFU) model – to empirically study how one particular group of academic scientists has responded to neoliberal changes in science policy and funding in Canada. The data we use are from a qualitative case study of 20 basic health scientists affiliated with a research-intensive university in a large Canadian city. We use the PFP/PFU model to explore the symbolic strategies (the vision of scientific quality) and practical strategies (the acquisition of funding and production of knowledge outputs) scientists adopt to maintain or advance their own position of power in the scientific field. We also compare similarities and differences among scientists trained before and after the rise of neoliberal policy. The PFP/PFU model allows us to see how these individual strategies cumulatively contribute to the construction of dominant and alternate modes of knowledge production. We argue that the alignments and misalignments between quality vision and practice that scientists in this study experienced reflect the symbolic struggles that are occurring among scientists, and between the scientific and political field, over two competing logics and reward systems (PFP/PFU).},\n\turldate = {2022-11-22},\n\tbooktitle = {Fields of {Knowledge}: {Science}, {Politics} and {Publics} in the {Neoliberal} {Age}},\n\tpublisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},\n\tauthor = {Albert, Mathieu and McGuire, Wendy},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009},\n\tpages = {33--57},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Albert, M.","McGuire, W."],"key":"albert_understanding_2014","id":"albert_understanding_2014","bibbaseid":"albert-mcguire-understandingchangeinacademicknowledgeproductioninaneoliberaleraauthorshipinalphabeticalorderthispaperhasbeenauthoredequally-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920140000027009"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/9820733/collections/G7JYFHFY/items?key=EW32OBYNdaOueHqISHxFeFWe&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["9FDpjNm6eBguXNQsY"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["understanding","change","academic","knowledge","production","neoliberal","era","authorship","alphabetical","order","paper","authored","equally","albert","mcguire"],"title":"Understanding Change in Academic Knowledge Production in a Neoliberal Era☆Authorship in alphabetical order; this paper has been authored equally.","year":2014}