Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Alderete, J. D. Phonology, 18(2):201–253, August, 2001. ![Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex This paper presents a theory of morphophonology based on a development in the theory of faithfulness in Optimality Theory. A new constraint type, anti-faithfulness, is proposed that evaluates a pair of related words and requires an alternation in the shared stem. This constraint type is motivated initially by a set of problems, e.g. morphological deletions, segmental exchanges and non-structure preserving processes, which show that morphophonology must encompass more than markedness–faithfulness interactions. The anti-faithfulness thesis is then applied to accentual processes in which affixes idiosyncratically cause deletion of accent in a neighbouring morpheme. It is argued that anti-faithfulness both motivates the observed deletion and accounts for its properties with principles that are generally available in phonological theory. Anti-faithfulness is then shown to extend naturally to the analysis of other affix-induced alternations, including accent insertions, shifts, and retractions of stress and tone, a result which distinguishes this theory from plausible alternatives.
@article{alderete_dominance_2001,
title = {Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness},
volume = {18},
issn = {0952-6757, 1469-8188},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0952675701004067/type/journal_article},
doi = {10.1017/S0952675701004067},
abstract = {This paper presents a theory of morphophonology based on a development in the
theory of faithfulness in Optimality Theory. A new constraint type,
anti-faithfulness, is proposed that evaluates a pair of related words and requires an
alternation in the shared stem. This constraint type is motivated initially by a set
of problems, e.g. morphological deletions, segmental exchanges and non-structure
preserving processes, which show that morphophonology must encompass more
than markedness–faithfulness interactions. The anti-faithfulness thesis is then
applied to accentual processes in which affixes idiosyncratically cause deletion of
accent in a neighbouring morpheme. It is argued that anti-faithfulness both
motivates the observed deletion and accounts for its properties with principles
that are generally available in phonological theory. Anti-faithfulness is then
shown to extend naturally to the analysis of other affix-induced alternations,
including accent insertions, shifts, and retractions of stress and tone, a result
which distinguishes this theory from plausible alternatives.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2023-01-02},
journal = {Phonology},
author = {Alderete, John D.},
month = aug,
year = {2001},
pages = {201--253},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"QepoA9r85o7RhrxAr","bibbaseid":"alderete-dominanceeffectsastransderivationalantifaithfulness-2001","author_short":["Alderete, J. D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness","volume":"18","issn":"0952-6757, 1469-8188","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0952675701004067/type/journal_article","doi":"10.1017/S0952675701004067","abstract":"This paper presents a theory of morphophonology based on a development in the theory of faithfulness in Optimality Theory. A new constraint type, anti-faithfulness, is proposed that evaluates a pair of related words and requires an alternation in the shared stem. This constraint type is motivated initially by a set of problems, e.g. morphological deletions, segmental exchanges and non-structure preserving processes, which show that morphophonology must encompass more than markedness–faithfulness interactions. The anti-faithfulness thesis is then applied to accentual processes in which affixes idiosyncratically cause deletion of accent in a neighbouring morpheme. It is argued that anti-faithfulness both motivates the observed deletion and accounts for its properties with principles that are generally available in phonological theory. Anti-faithfulness is then shown to extend naturally to the analysis of other affix-induced alternations, including accent insertions, shifts, and retractions of stress and tone, a result which distinguishes this theory from plausible alternatives.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2023-01-02","journal":"Phonology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Alderete"],"firstnames":["John","D."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"August","year":"2001","pages":"201–253","bibtex":"@article{alderete_dominance_2001,\n\ttitle = {Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness},\n\tvolume = {18},\n\tissn = {0952-6757, 1469-8188},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0952675701004067/type/journal_article},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0952675701004067},\n\tabstract = {This paper presents a theory of morphophonology based on a development in the \ntheory of faithfulness in Optimality Theory. A new constraint type, \nanti-faithfulness, is proposed that evaluates a pair of related words and requires an \nalternation in the shared stem. This constraint type is motivated initially by a set \nof problems, e.g. morphological deletions, segmental exchanges and non-structure \npreserving processes, which show that morphophonology must encompass more \nthan markedness–faithfulness interactions. The anti-faithfulness thesis is then \napplied to accentual processes in which affixes idiosyncratically cause deletion of \naccent in a neighbouring morpheme. It is argued that anti-faithfulness both \nmotivates the observed deletion and accounts for its properties with principles \nthat are generally available in phonological theory. Anti-faithfulness is then \nshown to extend naturally to the analysis of other affix-induced alternations, \nincluding accent insertions, shifts, and retractions of stress and tone, a result \nwhich distinguishes this theory from plausible alternatives.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2023-01-02},\n\tjournal = {Phonology},\n\tauthor = {Alderete, John D.},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2001},\n\tpages = {201--253},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Alderete, J. D."],"key":"alderete_dominance_2001","id":"alderete_dominance_2001","bibbaseid":"alderete-dominanceeffectsastransderivationalantifaithfulness-2001","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0952675701004067/type/journal_article"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/abraver","dataSources":["ZCvfhoPJsvp6TqwWi","9Y3aY84prc5nLGGNn","DGADNcDKaoqbt4RLh"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["dominance","effects","transderivational","anti","faithfulness","alderete"],"title":"Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness","year":2001}