{"_id":"haT4yTq2LgM5nYfT6","bibbaseid":"alkharat-rogers-inelasticperformanceofcoldformedsteelstrapbracedwalls-2007","author_short":["Al-Kharat, M.","Rogers, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","language":"English","copyright":"Compendex","title":"Inelastic performance of cold-formed steel strap braced walls","journal":"Journal of Constructional Steel Research","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Al-Kharat"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rogers"],"firstnames":["C.A."],"suffixes":[]}],"volume":"63","number":"4","year":"2007","pages":"460 - 474","issn":"0143974X","abstract":"The inelastic performance of sixteen 2.44 m×2.44 m cold-formed steel strap braced walls was evaluated experimentally. The performance was affected by the holddown detail, which in many cases did not allow the test specimens to reach or maintain a yield capacity and severely diminished the overall system ductility. \"Test-based\" R<inf>d</inf> × R<inf>o</inf> values of 3.65, 2.11 and 1.72 indicate the low ductility levels, which were not adequate to warrant the use of a seismic response modification coefficient of R = 4.0 in design. Capacity design of the SFRS elements must account for the overstrength of the strap material. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","key":"20064810274723","keywords":"Ductility;Earthquake resistance;Walls (structural partitions);Yield stress;","note":"Inelastic;Seismic response;Strap brace;","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.040","bibtex":"@article{20064810274723 ,\nlanguage = {English},\ncopyright = {Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2023 Elsevier Inc.},\ncopyright = {Compendex},\ntitle = {Inelastic performance of cold-formed steel strap braced walls},\njournal = {Journal of Constructional Steel Research},\nauthor = {Al-Kharat, M. and Rogers, C.A.},\nvolume = {63},\nnumber = {4},\nyear = {2007},\npages = {460 - 474},\nissn = {0143974X},\nabstract = {The inelastic performance of sixteen 2.44 m×2.44 m cold-formed steel strap braced walls was evaluated experimentally. The performance was affected by the holddown detail, which in many cases did not allow the test specimens to reach or maintain a yield capacity and severely diminished the overall system ductility. \"Test-based\" R<inf>d</inf> × R<inf>o</inf> values of 3.65, 2.11 and 1.72 indicate the low ductility levels, which were not adequate to warrant the use of a seismic response modification coefficient of R = 4.0 in design. Capacity design of the SFRS elements must account for the overstrength of the strap material. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},\nkey = {Steel structures},\nkeywords = {Ductility;Earthquake resistance;Walls (structural partitions);Yield stress;},\nnote = {Inelastic;Seismic response;Strap brace;},\nURL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.040},\n} \n\n\n","author_short":["Al-Kharat, M.","Rogers, C."],"id":"20064810274723","bibbaseid":"alkharat-rogers-inelasticperformanceofcoldformedsteelstrapbracedwalls-2007","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.040"},"keyword":["Ductility;Earthquake resistance;Walls (structural partitions);Yield stress;"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/m3A3cns49MKmeRzt5","dataSources":["uT2zXYMHTeKLr3NSv","6Aw5QAtT2yLJ3d2JP","qBPxBjrzghRQ4Wzbf","EnwwBMFxopKkypo2f","8uWbXNBCDiEboMj8h"],"keywords":["ductility;earthquake resistance;walls (structural partitions);yield stress;"],"search_terms":["inelastic","performance","cold","formed","steel","strap","braced","walls","al-kharat","rogers"],"title":"Inelastic performance of cold-formed steel strap braced walls","year":2007}