A field evaluation of distance measurement error in auditory avian point count surveys. Alldredge, M. W., Simons, T. R., & Pollock, K. H. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71:2759–2766, 2007. Distance estimation errors for all experiments were substantial, although, training did reduce errors and bias in distance estimates
A field evaluation of distance measurement error in auditory avian point count surveys [link]Paper  bibtex   
@Article{Alldredge2007,
  author       = {Alldredge, M. W. and T. R. Simons and K. H. Pollock},
  title        = {A field evaluation of distance measurement error in auditory avian point count surveys},
  journal      = {Journal of Wildlife Management},
  year         = {2007},
  volume       = {71},
  pages        = {2759--2766},
  note         = {Distance estimation errors for all experiments were substantial, although, training did reduce errors and bias in distance estimates},
  url          = {http://www.wildlifejournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-toc&issn=0022-541X&volume=71&issue=8},
  comment      = {http://www4.ncsu.edu/~simons/Distance%20Estimation%20Error%204-25-06.pdf},
  file         = {Alldredgeetal2007c.pdf:Alldredgeetal2007c.pdf:PDF},
  keywords     = {abundance, auditory detections, bird surveys, distance estimation, measurement error, point count surveys},
  numero       = {5},
  owner        = {Tiago},
  paperprinted = {yes},
  subdatabase  = {distance, measurement error},
  timestamp    = {2006.11.18},
}

Downloads: 0